My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-02-15 twaikoloadevco
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-02-15 twaikoloadevco
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:00:27 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:00:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BAIL: You’re welcome. <br />GRAHAM: I have a number of things to say on this. First, if we took a parallel like <br />global warming, in this case we are out measuring nutrients, so maybe global warming we are <br />out measuring CO2 concentration in the atmosphere like they do at Mauna Loa. You can <br />monitor forever, but the question is when do you take action. And I think that’s what we are <br />finding in our international and national global warming debate. You know, is the science clear <br />or is it not clear? And if it’s clear, then it’s time to take action. <br />And to me that also brings up a very strong feeling on the interpretation we get on this report <br />prepared by the University of Hawaii Marine Science Department versus the interpretation we <br />get from the private consultants. We’ve had – from following ocean quality issues for many <br />years – we’ve had Mr. Dollar and Mr. Brock, and for a short time there was Mr. Ziemann, <br />preparing these ocean water quality reports for just about every development in West Hawaii <br />since certainly in the beginning of the 80s.And they are very qualified individuals, and I <br />certainly take no issue with their integrity of their numbers and what they are presenting. <br />However, when it gets to interpretation, as to what these numbers mean, we never really have <br />independent points of view; we always get what’s presented by the developers through their <br />consultants. And now for the first time we have a strong comprehensive overview of what’s <br />going on and independent interpretation of what’s going on. And so if I just read – these are just <br />some of the excerpts that I read from the Marine Science Review prepared by the UH Hilo <br />people – Page 4, “It is estimated that nutrient concentrations in the archialine ponds in Waikoloa <br />have more than doubled since the resort’s development.”; Page 4 also, “These elevated nutrient <br />concentrations may lead to algal blooms in West Hawaii, which may be comprised of exotic <br />and/or harmful species.” Now if I compared this with Mr. Dollar’s presentation before the Land <br />Use Commission, who says they can just occur in natural ocean water without any attributes <br />from the land, I have to evaluate the sources. In one case I have four disinterested parties <br />working for UH Hilo in the Marine Science Department, and the other I have a party contracted <br />by an applicant for a land use change. So I certainly cannot say these independent people that <br />were contracted by the Planning Department, I should disregard their testimony; I tend to more <br />highly regard their testimony because they are disinterested. <br />And I personally, from reading these things, feel like we need to do action; it’s not like we can <br />wait until we have the situation develop here, which developed on Maui.And the situation is <br />still strong on Maui, and is stronger now than it was a number of years ago. I lived on Maui in <br />the 1970s. This was not going on down at that time even though – to my knowledge it wasn’t <br />and I had read anything about it – even though Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar was sure doing <br />their agricultural operations and Kaanapali was in full bloom back then. So what I’m saying is <br />when I read Mr. Brock’s interpretation of his sampling, it reads so very different from what I <br />read from the Marine Science Department of University of Hawaii at Hilo; and what I read from <br />the Marine Science Department of University of Hawaii at Hilo is that things have reached a <br />crucial situation. As Commissioner Iwashita indicated, conditions may be developing for <br />environmental degradation as what we read in this report. So to me changing monitoring <br />protocols and all is a very – perhaps necessary but – weak response to this. So – I don’t know – <br />I’m very appreciative that the County contracted this that we have a third point of view; I very <br />much like the idea that we have a conference to try to work out what are very different attitudes <br />as far as interpretation of the results. But I personally can certainly not support going forward as <br />if this report never existed that essentially contradicts interpretation what so much of what we’ve <br />EXHIBIT C <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.