2005-02-18 TDEUTSCH - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

State Historic Preservation District indicated that there would be no historic effect on this particular property. The Planning Director is recommending approval of this particular application. At the last meeting which was- we were not able to hear this application, we submitted a revised Condition H as was recommended by the Department of Public Works and you all were- the revised Condition H was circulated to you. Are there any questions at this time? GALDONES:Commissioners? Commissioner Graham. GRAHAM:Norman, just for clarification, I found a couple of inconsistencies between the County background and environmental report as opposed to the report that goes with the recommendation, the one on the yellow. In the County departmental background and environmental report I noticed that it has on Page 2 up near the top, it’s talking about the building envelope it says, “The conditions have included a 60-foot wide ‘forest reserve easement’ along the…public street frontage” but the yellow recommendations call for a 100-foot, which I think it’s what- is what the County is doing. So the 100-foot is correct? HAYASHI:That is correct. The County Environmental, I mean, County’s Background Environmental Report was submitted with the application by the applicant. In cases, it may have been an oversight on the applicant’s part regarding the 100-feet versus the 60-feet. GRAHAM:And the other one was probably a similar thing. On page 12 of that same white paper it says availability of water. It says water is available via 8-inch line on Kaloko Drive and when you look at the yellow pages it says water available from a 4-inch line. Is a 4-inch line is what’s there? HAYASHI:In this particular case, yes, it would be a- one second let me take a look at that. According to the Department of Water Supply they indicated that it is a 4-inch line to this particular property. GRAHAM:All right, thank you. HAYASHI:Also I just wanted to note that as far as the background report, it lists the previous general plan designation for this area. Since the general plan was recently adopted I believe that this particular area is designated as other agricultural land, under the current- the new general plan. GALDONES:Any further questions, Commissioners, of Norman? Norman, there’s going to be two other items on the agenda in reference to any development at that Kaloko subdivision, and there is going to be reference to impact fees regarding the traffic there. Could you give us an update on the status of that- of any improvements that’s planned for that intersection. HAYASHI:I believe one of the applicants- previous applicants- was required to do a traffic impact study for that particular area identifying what the impacts would be. I’m not sure which application it was, and currently we’re checking to see whether such a report was actually submitted. So, at this time, I don’t have any more information. And we don’t know what 2