My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-02-21 TORCHIDLAND
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-02-21 TORCHIDLAND
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:07:31 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:07:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
We would ask that, that is our most important, I think, point, is that we are very much <br />worried about that negative impact, the trash in our community as we try to improve it <br />and pave it. We are also worried about liability, cars by the -, traffic of unlicensed <br />vehicles, and with the drug traffic that's already happening at the existing, part of the <br />project that has been completed; and it's not being addressed. So we have to -. So we do <br />have community concerns that have changed since the project has been started and, <br />therefore, it has changed our feelings. <br />Please let me reiterate, we are not against this project, we are for the project. But we are <br />for it being done with community input and with the developer pa <br />mitigation of the financial impact negative to our community. H <br />months ago, we would have probably been able to iron this out and come before you this <br />morning and say we are for this project. We would like to do so <br />development in our community. It produces jobs, revenues, services for our members, <br />which is what we are charged with doing as a board, and therefore, we -. So please do <br />not take our statements as being anti-development or anti this developer. We're anti this <br />development as it stands now without conditions and safeguards that we see necessary for <br />our community to be put in place. We do understand that there are other permits required <br />to complete this project. But we feel if some of the safeguards are put into the special use <br />permit that it will be much easier for us to appearing before further boards and further <br />commissions, further planning hearings, to say that this has not been met or has been met. <br />That's why we're requesting that it be added as a condition of the permit. We feel that <br />that way we'll protect the interests of our community in the future. <br />As Mr. Okuyama himself has stated, they have made promises to us in the past that were <br />verbal outside of the permit process. They have not been -, the commitments have not <br />been met. And therefore, we are therefore now asking that they put in writing, be <br />codified, so that we have a so-to-speak legal leg to stand on should they not be fulfilled in <br />the future. Thank you, ma'am. <br />KUBOTA:Thank you for your complete answer. I have another quest <br />related to the question that I just posed. It's a legal question. What are the -? We have a <br />permit that we granted under certain conditions. They are coming in for an extension of <br />that particular permit. Now what are the legalities of adding additional conditions on it? <br />I mean, are we allowed to do that? Is it legal to do that? I mean, where do we stand on <br />it? <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen. <br />YUEN:Well, I think it's certainly legal to add conditions that a <br />the passage of time and changed conditions, yeah. <br />KUBOTA:Excuse me, I meant over and beyond that. <br />YUEN:Yeah. <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.