My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-02-21 TORCHIDLAND
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-02-21 TORCHIDLAND
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:07:31 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:07:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
because of hardship, okay. Now, in the meantime, is it fair for <br />adding things to it, or can they just maintain the original agre <br />TORIGOE:Well, it depends on your judgment as to whether, you kno <br />have been changes in circumstances because of the passage of time that require for the <br />public good and based on the special permit criteria that would, that in your judgment <br />require that there be some additional conditions. I think, and you've had a couple of <br />conditions that have been presented to you and that the Director agrees with, so those are <br />some examples of that. But if in your judgment there are, there's no need for such things, <br />then, you know, you could make the extension without changing th <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen, in Condition No. 3, it speaks of the fine plan approval <br />being secured from the Planning Department within one year. Does the extension of the <br />time retrigger that one year? <br />YUEN:Yes. Well, the, let's see. If you approve the extension of time as <br />we've written it up, let's see here. Did they get a final plan approval? Did they ever get a <br />final plan approval? <br />IMAMURA:Final plan approval was granted for the Wiki Wiki Mart and the <br />gas station. <br />YUEN:Okay. So are we saying -? Are they, did they comply with No. 3? <br />IMAMURA:Not for the whole development. <br />YUEN:Not for the whole development. It doesn't say for the whol <br />development. Well, we are saying that they complied with No. 3 by having a plan <br />approval for the first phase, and so all that's, we don't have a deadline for them -. Under <br />the way this is written now, there is, they would have to get a plan approval for the <br />second phase for the new construction, but we don't have a deadline for that. The only <br />deadline would be that the construction would have to be completed within five years <br />after the date of this amendment. So they could come in for the plan approval for the <br />second phase in four years if that's -? Is that what you're asking? <br />GALDONES:Yes. <br />YUEN:Yeah. Okay. <br />GALDONES:Thank you. Okay. <br />KUBOTA:I have one more question. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Kubota. <br />21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.