My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-02-21 TORCHIDLAND
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-02-21 TORCHIDLAND
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:07:31 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:07:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
through to F. And at this point, I'm guessing, based on what I'm being told, that the <br />current condition of traffic on this intersection does warrant your previous concern and <br />that your request for me to do this study was a valid request. Because the report card <br />at the intersection at this particular time is somewheres in the area of a D or an F, and I <br />think that should be considered. <br />The idea of granting an extension on this permit without addressing this issue would <br />grant the developer the opportunity to start building and to build his development with <br />the current uses as determined in 1990 without actually addressing passage of time. <br />Passage of time has changed the traffic impact, you know, for this development. And <br />as you may be aware, this particular project has never done a traffic study. And <br />because of that, they're in a situation now where they can move forward and build out <br />this center without actually addressing the issues that I've discovered in the last few <br />months in the process of doing this traffic report. Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Thank you. Any questions or comments of Mr. Wood? <br />Mr. Wood, are you aware that in the Background Report, the Department of <br />Transportation did a study dated January 7, 2003, and their report says that the five- <br />year extension is not going to impact the State highway facility? <br />WOOD:I'm sorry, I didn't hear that. <br />GALDONES:The Department of Transportation report that was in the form of <br />a letter dated January 7, 2003, they said that granting the extension is not going to <br />impact the highway facilities. <br />WOOD:I'm glad to hear that. I suspect that my project won't have that <br />much impact either. However, I'm merely relaying the information that my traffic <br />engineer has given me as to the current condition without any development. <br />GALDONES:Okay. Thank you. Any further questions or comments of <br />Mr. Wood? Otherwise, thank you very much, Mr. Wood. <br />Could we have Mr. Howard and Mr. McElvaney come forward. <br />YUEN:You know, I just wanted to make a comment on the Department <br />of Transportation -. They tend to not really look at things very carefully when it's a <br />time extension. So I don't know that we can interpret that as them saying there's no <br />problem at the intersection. They are just saying, oh, it's just a time extension, no big <br />deal. <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Yuen. Mr. Howard, Mr. McElvaney, you have <br />heard the testimony and the discussion that ensued. Do you have any closing <br />statements to make? <br />24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.