My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-02-21 tkamuela
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-02-21 tkamuela
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:07:39 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:07:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OÓTOOLE:Do you want me to respond now or -? <br />KUBOTA:Yes. <br />OÓTOOLE:Okay. Yeah, the ordinance did provide for incremental rezoning <br />so that the first increment was supposed to have 50 percent agricultural use in the way <br />that it was defined before the second increment should have been approved. WeÓre now <br />at the point where everything was approved and it was subdivided. So I donÓt believe <br />that that has anything to do any more with this particular permit. It was just when you <br />could subdivide the next part of this. <br />KUBOTA:That was when, excuse me. Mr. Chair? <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Kubota? <br />KUBOTA:That was when Mr., whatÓs his name, the original subdivider? <br />OÓTOOLE:Trump, yeah, yeah. <br />KUBOTA:Trump, Mr. Trump. That pertained to his actions when he was <br />initially trying to subdivide this whole Kauakea Subdivision. It was a mass of land. <br />OÓTOOLE:Right. Yes. <br />KUBOTA:Okay. So the first increment was what you said and then <br />and so on. But now weÓre in a different generation where those stipulations that <br />Mr. Figueiroa alluded to do not apply? <br />OÓTOOLE:Right. Now weÓre dealing with, yeah, that was just for <br />subdivision. So we have subdivided and here we are. <br />KUBOTA:Okay. The reason I ask that point is that the half-an-acre, had this <br />project been contiguously within half-an-acre of land, it would have been -. Well, it <br />probably would have been a lot easier to consider. But because this project exceeds <br />half-an-acre, in total, as weÓre led to understand, the County is coming from that position. <br />Is that correct? <br />OÓTOOLE:Yes. <br />KUBOTA:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Any further questions of Ms. OÓToole? If none, Mr. Wilson, are <br />you going to be providing testimony? <br />WILSON:Yes. <br />17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.