Laserfiche WebLink
WOODWARD: Is that appropriate? <br />WATANABE: I think so. It seems like we are at the end of the discussion. So you all <br />may be seated. Thank you. And, yeah, we’ll entertain a motion, Mr. Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. I would like to make a motion that in the matter of Special Permit <br />No. 956 that we grant the amendment for a 10-year time extension to Condition No. 5. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. <br />DOMINGO: Second. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. It’s been moved -. <br />SIRACUSA: Excuse me. Is that with the corrections -? <br />WATANABE: I take it that it’s with the corrections to the -. <br />SIRACUSA: To the conditions? <br />WOODWARD: Yes. <br />WATANABE: Putting in No. “12” and also adding in “The applicant shall -.” <br />WOODWARD: Corrections, yes, as -, yeah. <br />WATANABE: Right, to No. 3. <br />SIRACUSA: Thank you. <br />WATANABE: For the record, I’d like to indicate that there’s no one from the public that <br />indicated any desire to testify.Oh, no one from the public is present, actually. Okay. So it’s <br />been moved and seconded. Any further discussion on this matter? <br />ALAMEDA: Sure. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Alameda. <br />ALAMEDA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Originally when I was looking at the application, I <br />thought, wow, 10 years, that’s unusual because you usually go 5 years, yeah? But of course <br />when you look at what the applicant is trying to do and the operation, then it makes total sense. <br />So, I mean, I like the application, the conditions to me are all mitigating factors that can <br />potentially be adverse to the operation. So I think it’s good and I’ll be voting in favor of the <br />motion. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. Any further discussion on the matter? Mr. Darrow. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />5 <br /> <br />