Laserfiche WebLink
policies, and it provides for means to make the decisions as to where those developments could <br />be. But, and as I understand it, the Community Development Plan is a finer or detailed <br />explanation or expression of what is in the General Plan. And I think one of the best things that <br />is happening now is that it’s going to be adopted by ordinance and therefore making it a law and <br />that’s something that everyone has to adhere to. In the past where you have Community <br />Development Plans, you know, you have the community working very hard on the Plan and then <br />they find out at a later date, you know, what they’ve actually wanted for a certain area is not <br />actually what the community had actually wanted. And it’s only because it’s an advisory <br />document, you know, okay, this will be a, it will be a good place that we locate such and such <br />things in this area, but then by the interpretation of the planners, you know, things have changed, <br />things are changed. So I think the most important aspect is what I’m saying is that it is by law, <br />and that it gives the community a sense of ownership to what the Plan really says, and that their <br />time and the efforts that they put in would be not, would be not for not, you know, it would be <br />something that they know will happen and something that they have ownership in. That’s the <br />bottom line. <br />I think, as far as the time element, as Ms. Siracusa indicated, I think it’s appropriate as presented <br />at this time because, you know, you find a community has worked very hard and put in a lot of <br />effort in the planning, and once it comes up to the Planning Commission review I think they are <br />just waiting, you know, they are just waiting that it will just pass as they presented it; and that <br />they’d like for that Plan to start moving on, so that it will be adopted by ordinance. You give <br />more time, it gives people with other difference of opinion in the community or other parts of the <br />county more time to organize and put up organized effort in trying to defeat the Plan or parts of <br />the Plan. And I think the community has a final decision to that; and to give it more time for <br />review I think would be just in my case inviting more, inviting problems to it through the <br />process. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. Do we have any further comments or questions? Yes, <br />Mr. Alameda. <br />ALAMEDA: One more question. You know with the Plan, is there a specific timeline <br />on when it should be revised? Because my only concern is that communities change over time; <br />and so what might be what the community wanted ten years ago may not be the same community <br />and they might like something different. So if we are going to make this Community Plan <br />become, you know, ordinance, how long does it become ordinance? <br />YUEN: I don’t think, the discussion of the process for a CDP is in the -. Actually <br />it’s in the General Plan; the General Plan calls for them. It doesn’t have a specific renewal date; <br />but because the General Plan itself has a renewal date of ten years to do a comprehensive review, <br />my expectation is that you would run the same cycle in, after doing the General Plan review. <br />ALAMEDA: Okay, thank you. <br />WATANABE: Is that satisfactory? <br />ALAMEDA: It’s good. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />6 <br /> <br />