My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-02-24 TInitiator_Planning_Director
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-02-24 TInitiator_Planning_Director
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:14:43 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:14:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
how they were going to build their roads. And then this would be reviewed and then approved. <br />And theres a lot of information that thats supposed to be on a preliminary plat that says it shall <br />be on the plat. In actual practice at least since the 1970s whats submitted in a preliminary plat <br />you will have a road and you will have a general layout of the subdivision and much of the <br />information that would not have the level of detail called for by strict reading of the subdivision <br />code. This goes back, I talked to Sidney Fuke who was a Director in the 70s and this goes back <br />at least to Sidney Fukes time. And it has been a more practical way of doing subdivisions <br />because its actually premature to engineer the roads before you have approval of the basic <br />layout. Sometimes a subdivision comes in, the subdivision map comes in for initial review and <br />sometimes the department will require changes to that. For example to connect the road to a <br />road on an adjacent property or at a different location. So there are often changes on the plat and <br />if you had spent the money to engineer your roads before hand if wouldve been wasted. Also <br />the Department has typically waived some minor deficiencies in the plat. For example, just to <br />give one example it calls, the subdivision code says youre supposed to show zoning on adjacent <br />properties.Wellweknowwhatthezoningisonadjacentpropertiesfrominformationthatwe <br />have in our own office and so rather than be nasty and send the map back to the subdivider or <br />their surveyor we would often accept it and then have, have the information on when their map is <br />finally approved. This sort of things the Supreme Court says we cant do anymore and it creates <br />a problem for a number-. We have several hundred pending subdivisions in the office, which <br />may not comply. And theres also a lingering question about subdivisions that have been <br />approved that dont comply. So what we want to do is amend the subdivision code to fix all <br />these problems. And so in doing so we went through and we found a number of things that have <br />been not been typical practice and so theres a series of amendments here and Im going to try to <br />quickly go through and explain what each one does. I know its been a long day but I do think to <br />be fair to everybody I want to explain this. The first one is at the bottom of page 2 and the top of <br />page 3 of the handout. The subdivision code specifies maximum grades and curves. As we were <br />just discussing these have not been followed over the years. They, they do, there is an out that <br />says that they can be, variations can be permitted to meet unusual conditions. Well, an unusual <br />condition is usually that the ground is really steep and the parcel is kind of narrow. So and that <br />tends to come up all the time. So rather than specify this in the code we simply say that it shall <br />conform to accepted engineering practices determined by the Department of Public Works. And <br />they do have a manual for how they. This doesnt leave it wide open. They have a manual and <br />there are national standards that they can use. The next one is just to cross out the word <br />improvement plans. Those are not typically submitted with the preliminary plat that was the first <br />part of the application. Then the next on page 4 is to make it clear. The way the procedure was <br />because you were supposed to be submitting really complete application then the County was <br />supposed to complete the review in 45 days. But the typical practice has been to defer, to take it <br />in and then to defer final action while it is being reviewed and this, this spells out that this is a <br />permitted practice. It also says there is also an automatic approval clause and it, in the original, <br />in the subdivision code and this basically says that if the County misses the deadlines and its <br />automatically approved that the normal subdivision requirements apply to the plat. So that in <br />other words youre not going to have a substandard subdivision approved by, just because the <br />County didnt get to, you know lost it in a pile or somebody was sick the day it was due or <br />something like that. Page 6 is an important clause and that is-. It says that once the Director has <br />accepted the preliminary plat that any, that we waive any defects in it. We can ask for <br />information to fix it but what, we cant-. Somebody who wants to attack it later cant come back <br />EXHIBIT <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.