2006-02-24 TKona_REZ05026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

C thatmeans that they would have to put the money to provide infrastructure to create that level of service C condition. So you know we have that-. GRAHAM:Well thank you for the impact. I certainly dont want to, I mean for the comments, I certainly dont want to prolong the (inaudible). I just was hoping for more readability in the Traffic Impact Analysis Report because we do try to read all this material thats all. Any further questions? Commissioner Springer? SPRINGER:Im not going to ask about traffic. Thank you. But I am looking at Mr. Normans letter and in his discussion of the Kealakawila he mentions water lines that apparently use the corridor of the, of the alakawila. Will those easements continue on for the cattle ranchers? If not at that location at some other site on the property? WHEELOCK:Those are technically not easements. Clarence Rapoza was ranching cattle onthispropertywhenitwasownedbytheNakaharaEstateformanymanyyears.Hecontinues to be our neighbor to the north. And we dont have any problem working with Mr. Rapoza and his needs. He is still ranching cattle to the south. And we have, as stated earlier were proponents of culturally and historically sensitive development, part of that is the cattle industry. And the Rapoza family themselves are kind of cultural so well support them. SPRINGER:Thank you. GRAHAM:Any further questions? Commissioner Iwashita? IWASHITA:Thank you. I dont know if you were here earlier and I expressed concerns in the prior matter about, in the need to you know provide-. Your look in the long term right? How this area is going to be developed and providing for the transportation needs of the area and how that would impact the particular in this case, this application. So my sense now in terms of where this is and with the, thank you for the additional information about the mauka properties and what exists today. You know theres obviously the present infrastructure such as it is I think in the long term and if you look at you know future development in this area were looking at-. Personally I think its important to look at the interconnectivity and to provide multiple access and just as a matter of good transportation planning. All right? And so, my sense is that that personally I would like to see a commitment to work with that. And in this particular case you know since historically there appears to have been this 2 wall enclosed infrastructure for access that that, and there is interest at least on one mauka landowner about this and-. But I think in the big picture our job is to not look at each individual landowners needs not just that we need to look at the big picture. That I would like to see that perspective given you know, being taken into account. And some connectivity or commitment to connectivity with the mauka parcels and the mauka road. And so that in the end, 20 to 30 years from now whenever it is you know that we have in your community, right, I dont know what you got a consensus but you know a traffic infrastructure set up where you know there is connectivity and youre not you know limited to one way to get out from where you live and so on. So Id like you to readdress that because you know we addressed it earlier. GRAHAM:Mr. Carr do you want to respond? EXHIBIT E 12