2006-02-24 TKona_REZ05026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CARR:Ric is saying that theres an area thats 17%. YUEN:Not low down though? Low down-? CARR:Low down were okay its the upper portion. YUEN:Yeah so its as I said the sidewalk portion is only in the RM. CARR:Correct. But again coming back to the-. As far, it was our intent to do a much more rural community with Ag standards 1-acre plus lots on the average. If it is the policy or the amendment now to ask us to say that all of the roadways be dedicable to the extent of meeting all our County standards. You know what my concern is, the impact on the cost and do I want to come in for more units in order to pro rate that cost. You know thats the issue. It alwayscomesbacktookaywhatstheeconomicimpactontheseadditionalimprovementsinthe community. See were trying to keep the cost down in order-. You know one perspective will say to go make more money and the other perspective is to mitigate costs for what were doing in public improvements and public benefits as well. GRAHAM:Can we leave this for now and get public testimony and then when you come back again after public testimony and then Mr. Yuen will have more time to think about it by then? Thank you all very much. EMLER:Commissioner Graham? GRAHAM:Yes. EMLER:While Im up here may I bring a couple of things to your attention? I was going to ask that Condition L have a slight revision. The second sentence, Im sorry third sentence. During, this is the same as the last application, yeah the last application Royal Alii we had this change made. Drainage improvements shall be constructed meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of final subdivision construction approval or. So final subdivision construction approval or is the added amendment and then continue as is. GRAHAM:All right thank you. EMLER:There was one other thing Id like to point out and that is in the application, Figure 10 showing the flood map it depicts what theyre saying is the current flood insurance rate map. That is not how the current flood insurance rate map would look if you included the revisions that had been made using map revision, letters of map revisions over the past few years for Malulani Gardens and the Lowes project. So that map is shown in Figure 10 I think its on page 39, is not, would not be the current map. And as stated in the narrative which is I think on page 37 it does reflect the correct status of the project in that a portion of it does lie within zone A. And its just the map does not. EXHIBIT E 19