My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-02-24 TKona_REZ05026
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-02-24 TKona_REZ05026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:37:40 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:37:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
public access dedicable roadway coming up in through the entry of our community and <br />terminating, if I may have a moment to illustrate to you. <br />GRAHAM:Yeah go right ahead. So Mr. Carr is going to be pointing out on the map <br />on the left <br />CARR:Commissioner Watanabe, this is our proposed continuation of the existing <br />roadway that will traverse through the community. Its our intent if youll note on one of the <br />conditions from public works in the amendment was to have dedicable roadways. We wanted to <br />clarify that this would be dedicable County standard roadways up until the terminus of this <br />intersection where theres a planned north/south connection and from thereafter going further <br />mauka that it would be private Ag standards for the reason being that it will be serving 57 <br />agricultural lots. We do not have, or have any knowledge as to the intent of the owners above us <br />of their intentions to rezone their property. Im not even quite sure if theyre in the urban <br />boundary.AsstatedbyMr.Hayashithispropertyisintheurbanboundary,StateLandUse <br />Urban, County Ag. We are requesting a change from Ag-5 to Ag-1 (sic) only because the <br />previous developer had intended and had planned to propose to develop about 400 somewhat <br />units there. But in taking a step back and looking what has been built to date with respect to <br />Malulani Gardens across the way here as well as the existing Lowes and other commercial sites <br />surrounding the property along the highway. We felt that we needed to mitigate any future <br />density because of traffic and vehicular access. And for that reason we felt that an <br />Ag-1 (sic)subdivision would be more appropriate but also addressing some of the community <br />needs with respect to the Salvation Army as well as some affordable multi families. <br />WATANABE:Thank you. <br />GRAHAM:Commissioner Springer I think Marissa is ready for a more detailed <br />explanation of your question. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />FURFARO:Okay there are 2 sites marked for preservation. One site falls within the <br />Lowes area site 19039 and that preservation plan has been completed. The second site falls on, <br />on this subject property and its 19056 and its above the scale. If you see the scale at the bottom <br />of the page. And for the location of that site on this preliminary concept its approximately the <br />rd <br />3 <br /> lot down on that southern edge of the property. Now whomever purchases that lot will be <br />made aware of the site and be required to follow the preservation plan. Now the preservation <br />plan is now in the planning stage. The data recovery plan, field work is to commence at the end <br />of March. Do you have any further questions on that topic? <br />SPRINGER:Not at this time thank you. <br />FURFARO:Okay thank you. <br />GRAHAM:Okay.DoyouhaveanyotherquestionsfromCommissioners? <br />Commissioner Iwashita? <br />EXHIBIT E <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.