My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
06-14-2022 Applicant Statement of Non-Appearance at June 16, 2022 LPC Hearing
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
*Background/Recommendation Reports (June 2020-Sept 2022)
>
2022
>
2022-07-21 Leeward
>
Item #2 Bolton, Inc. (REMAND SPP-16-000188)
>
06-14-2022 Applicant Statement of Non-Appearance at June 16, 2022 LPC Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2022 11:02:20 AM
Creation date
7/15/2022 2:10:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Michael Vitousek <br /> June 14, 2022 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Court did not have jurisdiction to review the decision of the Planning Director that Bolton's <br /> existing activities on the Property did not require a Special Permit. The Planning Commission <br /> has the jurisdiction to grant or deny an application for a Special Permit, Hawaii Revised Statutes <br /> ("HRS") § 205-6, while the Planning Director is more broadly responsible for administering and <br /> enforcing County zoning laws. See County Charter § 6-7.2; HRS § 205-12; Hawaii County <br /> Code ("HCC") § 25-2-1. The Planning Director's decision that Bolton's activities do not require <br /> a Special Permit could only be reviewed by filing an appeal with the Hawaii County Board of <br /> Appeals within thirty days of September 21, 2016. See HCC § 25-2-20. <br /> Finally, if the Leeward Planning Commission decides to allow Petitioners to intervene, <br /> there is no subsequent contested case to be had, as Bolton has withdrawn its application for the <br /> Special Permit which would have been the basis for the contested case hearing. A contested case <br /> is a proceeding to determine the legal rights, duties, or privileges of specific parties. See HRS § <br /> 91-1. If Petitioners are allowed to intervene, there will be no further legal rights, duties, or <br /> privileges for the Leeward Planning Commission to determine due to Bolton having withdrawn <br /> its application. Furthermore, Bolton would not be a party to any contested case as it is no longer <br /> pursuing its application for Special Permit. The Leeward Planning Commission has the authority <br /> to informally dispose of a contested case for a number of reasons that include default. Planning <br /> Commission Rule 4-1. In the present case the Leeward Planning Commission may dispose of <br /> any potential contested case as Bolton is voluntarily no longer a party and will not appear. <br /> For the reasons stated herein, Bolton will not appear at the Leeward Planning <br /> Commission's hearing scheduled for June 16, 2022, and takes no position on Petitioner's petition <br /> to intervene other than stating that Bolton will not participate in any subsequent contested case <br /> regarding Special Permit SPP NO. 16-000188. <br /> Very truly yours, <br /> LAW OFFICES OF YEH & KIM <br /> RONALD N.W. KIM <br /> Cc: Michael J. Matsukawa, Esq. <br /> Jean Campbell, Esq. <br /> Malia A. Kekai, Esq. <br /> Commission and has no power to vote on Commission decisions. See County Charter for the County of Hawaii <br /> ("County Charter") § 6-7.4. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.