Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PD BACKGROUND REPORT (PL-SMA-2022-012_AmendSMA-07-024_&_PL-REZ-2022-014_AmendREZ-07-075)
BHawaiione l InvestorsLLCREZAmend.crk.3.30.2022 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HAWAII ONE1 INVESTORS,LLC (FORMERLY KONA HEIGHTS,LLC) AMENDMENT TO SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA USE PERMIT (AMEND SMA 07-024) (PL-SMA-2022-000012) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 09 8 (AMEND REZ 07-075) (PL-REZ-2022-000014) HAWAII ONE1 INVESTORS,LLC has submitted the following: ■ Application for a five (5)-year time extension to Condition E (Time to Secure Final Subdivision Approval) and amendment to Condition K (Drainage Improvements) to allow for the option of bonding the drainage improvements or the use of other acceptable forms of surety in lieu of the construction of drainage improvements, prior to the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval, of Ordinance 09 8, which reclassified 11.05 acres of land from an Agricultural 5-acres (A-5a) to a Single-Family Residential-7,500 square feet (RS-7.5) zoned district.; and ■ Application for a five (5)-year time extension to Condition 4 (Time to Secure Final Subdivision Approval) of SMA Use Permit No. 07-024, which was approved to allow the development of a 65-lot, single family residential subdivision and related improvements. The property is located at the south end of Naniloa Street adjacent to the White Sands Beach Estates and Keauhou View Estates Subdivisions, Pahoehoe 1st, Kapala`alaea 2nd, North Kona, Hawaii, TMK: 7-7-008:121. APPLICANT'S REQUEST 1. Applicant's Request: The applicant is requesting the following amendments to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09 8: ■ A five (5)-year time extension to Condition E(Time to Secure Final Subdivision Approval); and ■ An amendment Condition K(Drainage Improvements)to allow for the option of bonding the drainage improvements or the use of other acceptable forms of surety in lieu of the construction of drainage improvements,prior to the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval. The requested amendment language is as follows (new material is underlined): K. A drainage study shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works. The recommended drainage improvements shall be constructed, or secured by a bond or other acceptable forms ofsurety, meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to receipt of Final Subdivision Approval. The drainage study shall include potential impacts from the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway culverts. ■ Finally, the applicant is requesting a five (5)-year time extension to Condition 4 (Time to Secure Final Subdivision Approval) of SMA Use Permit No. 07-024. 2. Reasons for the Request: Since the applicant acquired the property in 2013, they have worked diligently to comply with conditions of approval of both the change of zone ordinance and SMA Use Permit, including securing a Planned Unit Development(PUD) permit in 2016, finalizing and securing approval from the State Historic Preservation Division for Archaeological Data Recovery and Burial Treatment Plans in 2017, securing Tentative Approval for phase one of the subdivision in 2017, working with the Department of Parks and Recreation to locate a suitable site for a three (3) acre neighborhood park and completing an Environmental Assessment(EA) and receiving a Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI) for the park's development and securing approval for subdivision infrastructure construction plans in 2019. Despite this work, the applicant lost its funding to complete the project and could not find an alternative source within a timely manner. Thus,the applicant could not meet the February 9, 2019, deadline to secure Final Subdivision Approval,which necessitates the time extension requests. Furthermore, the applicant would like to secure a bond or other form of surety for all subdivision related infrastructure improvements, including drainage improvements as allowed for by the Subdivision Code. To do this, they are requesting an amendment to Condition K to allow for this flexibility. 3. Proposed Development: The applicant is proposing to develop a 62-lot residential subdivision with lots ranging in size from 3,082 square feet to 6,501 square feet and related improvements consistent with an approved PUD master plan. All proposed structures will be limited to one to two stories in height. According to the PUD permit, the PUD is designed to address the needs and lifestyle of residents who want to live in a planned residential community that is a more compact community with alternate standards versus the current, standard subdivision layout,which in many cases lacks a human scale and walkability. 4. Supportive Information: The applicant has submitted the attached in support of the request(Planning Department Exhibit 1 —Change of Zone and SMA Use Permit amendment requests dated January 6,2022.) 5. Landowner: Hawaii Onel Investors, LLC. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6. June 30,2008: Approval date of Special Management Area(SMA)Use Permit No. 07- 024,which allowed the development of a 65-lot, single-family residential subdivision within the subject property. Pursuant to Condition No. 2, the effective date of the SMA Use Permit is concurrent with the effective date of the associated change of zone for the project(see Exhibit B of Application). 7. February 9,2009: Effective date of Ordinance No. 09 7,which amended the State Land Use Boundary designation of the subject property from Agricultural to Urban and Ordinance 09 8,which rezoned the subject property from A-5a to RS-7.5 (see Exhibit A of Application). 8. August 1, 2013: Date the applicant acquired the property. 9. July 24,2014: Approval date of five (5)-year administrative time extensions to February 9, 2019, by which to complete the proposed subdivision of the property pursuant to Condition E of Ordinance No. 09 8 and Condition 4 of SMA Use Permit No. 07-024. 10. February 25,2016: Approval date of Planned Unit Development(PUD)No. 15-032 to allow for the development of a 62-lot subdivision with exceptions from the Subdivision and Zoning Codes to, "improve the overall quality, aesthetics, and to create a more pedestrian-oriented community that would not otherwise be possible with the current County ofHawai`i Codes and Standard Details for roadway construction."By letter dated August 30, 2020, the Planning Department confirmed that the applicant was still in compliance with the approved PUD (see Exhibit G of Application). 11. September 19,2017: Date that Tentative Approval (TA)was granted for Subdivision No. 17-001732, "La`ipala Makai PUD, Phase 1"for 23 lots and four(4)road lots. 12. July 12,2018: Date of approval of SMA Minor Permit No. 18-000393 to allow for the construction of a new subdivision access road from Alii Drive through TMK: 7-7- 008:001 to the subject property. Development of this roadway shall conform with requirements of an Archaeological Preservation Plan and Archaeological Monitoring Plan accepted by SHPD in August, 2019. 13. September 17,2018: Date of approval of a time extension to September 19, 2020,by which to complete conditions of the TA of Subdivision No. 17-001732. 14. October 25,2018: Date of amended TA for Subdivision No. 17-001732, "La`ipala Makai PUD, Phase 1"to add Access and Utility Easement AU-1 to accommodate access to the subject property from Ali`i Drive through the property to the west(makai) of the subject property. 15. February 13,2019: Date of approval of Construction Plans for infrastructure requirements for"La`ipala Makai PUD, Phase 1." 16. December 12,2019: Date of request to withdraw request for Final Subdivision Approval for Subdivision No. 17-001732 due to the applicant losing their financing for the project. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 17. State Land Use District: Urban. 18. General Plan LUPAG Map Designation: Low Density Urban,which allows residential, with ancillary community and public uses, and neighborhood and convenience-type commercial uses; overall residential density may be up to six units per acre. 19. County Zoning: Single-Family Residential-7,500 square feet. 20. Special Management Area: The project site is located in the County's Special Management Area (SMA). The SMA is a part of the Coastal Zone Management Program regulated by the County. The property is located approximately 800 feet mauka of the shoreline. 21. Kona Community Development Plan(CDP): The Kona CDP,was adopted by Ordinance 08- 131 on September 25,2008 by the Hawaii County Council. The project site is situated within the Kona Urban Area(KUA) and is situated within the outward fringes of the Kahalu`u Neighborhood Transient Oriented Development(TOD)area as shown on the Official Concurrency Map. DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA 22. Subject Property: The subject, 11.054-acre property is roughly rectangular in shape and located mauka of Alii Drive, immediately adjacent to the south of Keauhou View Estates and White Sands Beach subdivisions and bordered to the east(makai)by the proposed Kahului-Keauhou Parkway. 23. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: The White Sands Beach Estates and Keauhou View Estates are zoned RS-7.5 and located adjacent to the north of the project site. These areas are fully developed as residential subdivisions. Lands to the west(makai) of the property are zoned A-5a. The Kahului - Keauhou Parkway borders the property to the east(mauka). Vacant lands south of the project site are zoned RS-7.5 and RM-3.5. 24. Flood Zone: Zone "Y', or an area of minimal flood risk. According to the applicant, A drainage study has been prepared to include a flood study to determine whether the property may be inundated by the design discharge from the proposed culverts crossing Kahului to Keauhou Parkway and incorporated within construction drawings approved by the County. 25. Coastal Hazard: The property is located approximately 800 feet mauka of the shoreline, is not an oceanfront parcel, and will not affect, or be affected by shoreline processes. 26. Recreational Resources: Condition C of the subject change of zone ordinance requires the applicant to provide a minimum 5,000 square foot recreational area at the Naniloa Street end of the proposed subdivision and a minimum three (3)-acre,public neighborhood park sufficient in size and quality to create a playing field for team sports such as baseball, football, and/or soccer on another parcel of land within one-quarter mile of the proposed project,meeting with the approval of the Department of Parks and Recreation. According to the applicant,the preliminary subdivision plat map identifies Lot 22, consisting of 5,000 square feet,to be set aside as a park to be maintained and managed by the homeowners' association. This park will be assigned one 5/8-inch water meter for use by park guests. Additionally, in consultation with the Departments of Planning and Parks and Recreation, the applicant has designed and will construct a three (3)-acre neighborhood park on a County-owned parcel located within Alii Sunset subdivision located to the north of the proposed project. A Final Environmental Assessment, prepared by the applicant, and subsequent Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the development of this park was issued by the Department of Parks and Recreation on June 25, 2018. Plan Approval for the proposed park was issued by the Planning Department on November 1, 2018. The applicant proposes to construct the park project in conjunction with the 3rd Phase of the subject subdivision. 27. Scenic Resources: According to the applicant, there are partial ocean views from the Kahului to Keauhou Parkway. Views from the White Sands Beach Estates and Keauhou View Estates subdivisions to the north and Alii Heights to the northeast have relative unobstructed views south across the site and the undeveloped property to the south. Structures proposed for the project are one or two-story in height. Due to the slope gradient, partial views of the ocean coastline will be visible from the Kahului to Keauhou Parkway, and horizon views should be unobstructed. Some views may be partially obstructed; to the extent practicable, units will be sited to ensure view potentials. The applicant states the overall impact is not anticipated to be significant as the slope of the sight is gentle and views from existing houses in the direction of the project are limited. 28. Archaeological/Historical/Cultural Resources: A survey entitled 'Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK: 7-7-08:121, Land of Kapal`aalaea 2, North Kana District, Island ofHawai`i'; was prepared by Haun and Associates in January 2006. The archaeological inventory survey identified 14 sites assessed as significant for their information content. Three (3) of the historic properties were recommended for no further work,nine (9) sites were recommended for mitigation through data recovery, and two (2) sites (one ceremonial/habitation site complex (SIHP 24534)was recommended for preservation and one burial site (SIHP 24842)was recommended for preservation in the form of a Burial Treatment Plan (BTP). Conditions of the change of zone ordinance required the preceding plans to be developed and approved by the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD). By letter dated May 8, 2017, SHPD accepted the BTP as recommended by the Hawaii Island Burial Council (Planning Department Exhibit 2 — May 8,2017 Letter from SHPD and Final Burial Treatment Plan) and by letter dated October 31, 2017, SHPD confirmed completion of a Data Recovery Plan in 2010 and indicated that the applicant's archaeologists have completed the first five (5) of six (6) historic preservation review procedural steps. Furthermore,the letter outlined the remaining preservation steps to be completed (including short and long-term conservation measures for the sites to be preserved and archeological monitoring during land alteration activities) and concurred with the procedures and schedule of the applicant's archaeologists to complete the final step (verification of completion)per HAR §13-284- 3(b) (Planning Department Exhibit 3—May 27,2010 Letter from SHPD and Final Data Archaeological Recovery Plan). 29. Floral/Faunal Resources: Vegetation at the site is characterized by koa haole scrub land.A Survey of Botanical, Avian and Terrestrial mammalian Species for the proposed Laipala Heights Subdivision, North Kona District, Island ofHawai`i prepared by Rana Productions in 2006 identified 36 plant species of which two were indigenous. No hoary bats were detected during the field survey. The avian survey identified 224 birds of fourteen different non-native species. There were no species of flora or fauna currently listed as endangered, threatened, or proposed for listing under either the State or Federal endangered species programs. 30. Public Access: There is no record of a designated public access to the shoreline or mountain areas that traverses the project area. 31. Civil Defense Sirens: There are two (2) Civil Defense sirens in the immediate area, one located in the White Sands Beach Estates subdivision approximately 1,450 feet to the north from the subject property, and a second siren located approximately 3,100 feet to the south near Kahalu`u Beach Park. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 32. Access: Access to the project site will be from Alii Drive via a new access road (Pi`ilani Street),which will traverse the vacant property to the west(makai) of the subject property and connect to the Naniloa Street stub out at Queen Kalama Avenue. This roadway will be built to County dedicable standards as a local street and will be dedicated to the county upon completion. The alignment and design of these roadways are included in the approved subdivision construction drawings. Conditions of the change of zone ordinance also require roadway stub outs to the property to the south and prohibits roadway connections to adjoining parcels and vehicular access to individual lots from Kahului to Keauhou Parkway. However, a gated vehicular emergency egress to Kahului to Keauhou Parkway may be installed. 33. Traffic: To address concurrency requirements related to traffic, the applicant submitted an updated Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) from SSFM International dated October 2021. The TIAR included updated traffic counts and studied the impact of the proposed project on four(4) intersections (l. Alii Drive at La`aloa Avenue; 2. Route 11 at La`aloa Avenue; 3. Queen Kalama Avenue at Naniloa Drive; and 4.Ali`i Drive at Queen Kalama Avenue). According to the TIAR, all sudied intersections currently operate at Level Of Service (LOS) C or better during both AM and PM peak hours, and are expected to do so until 2031,thus no immidiate mitigation is warranted for existing conditions. The TIAR goes on to analyze future traffic conditions at the same intersections with and without the proposed project. The findings of that analysis are summarized as follows: "...the Laipala Makai project will have little impact to traffic delay at the Ali`i Drive at Queen Kalama Avenue and the Queen Kalama at Naniloa Drive intersections. At the proposed intersection of the project driveway and Ali`i Drive, a single-lane entrance and a single-lane exit will work acceptably. Traffic operations show that the all-way stop-control at Ali`i Drive and La`aloes Avenue will result in movements that operate at LOS E in Future (2041) Without Project and Future (2041) With Project conditions. The 8-Hour (Warrant I Condition B) and 4-Hour (Warrant 2) traffic signal warrants were satisfied and the resulting intersection analysis with a traffic signal with permitted phasing resulted in acceptable LOS for the intersection and movements. The future widening of Route 11 and/or the completion of the Ali`i Highway extension will likely lower the traffic volume at this intersection, resulting in better traffic operation at this intersection. It is recommended that this intersection be monitored, and the installation of a traffic signal be considered if needed. The v/c ratio for the northbound and southbound approaches at Route 11 and La`aloes Avenue will also be approaching LOS F in Future (2041). The north-south capacity will need to be increased through the widening of Route 11 from Henry Street to Kamehameha III Road or the construction of the Ali`i Highway extension, both of which have been planned for many years. 34. Water: According to the applicant and the Department of Water Supply, the applicant has secured a total of fifty (50)water commitments at an average of 400 gallons per day per unit or a total allocation of 20,000 gallons per day. As required by Condition B of the subject change of zone ordinance,Aina Engineers Inc. prepared water usage calculations for the proposed 62-lot subdivision that will follow LEED silver design/certification criteria that defines a baseline use of approximately 320 gallons per day for each residential unit or total allocation of 19,840 gallons. According to the applicant,two (2) additional lots within the proposed subdivision will be set aside as archaeological preserves with one (1) additional lot to be set aside as open space, all of which will not require water service. According to DWS,the applicant made the necessary payments on January 4, 2022 to extend these water commitments to June 30, 2023. Finally, the applicant will be required to construct necessary water system improvements to provide potable water and sufficient fire flow to the project meeting with DWS requirements. 35. Wastewater: The project will connect to the County sewer system. According to the applicant, pursuant to Condition L of the subject change of zone ordinance, Aina Engineers Inc. prepared a sewer study for the project that was approved by the Department of Environmental Management. 36. Solid Waste: Solid waste generated by the proposed project will be collected and disposed at approved County solid waste disposal facilities. 37. Essential Utilities and Services: Electricity and telephone services are available to the site. The Kealakehe Police Station is located about six (6)miles north of the project site, and fire protection is provided by the Keauhou Fire Station located approximately four (4)miles south of the property on Kuakini Highway. The Kona Community Hospital is located in Kealakekua approximately five(5)miles south of the site. AGENCIES' COMMENTS 38. Department of Environmental Management-Wastewater Division (Planning Department Exhibit 4—February 3,2022 memo) 39. Department of Water Supply (Planning Department Exhibit 5—February 28, 2022 memo and February 11,2022 memo) 40. Fire Department(Planning Department Exhibit 6—February 9,2022 email) 41. State Office of Planning and Sustainable Development(Planning Department Exhibit 7—February 17,2022 letter) 42. Department of Land and Natural Resources-Engineering Division (Planning Department Exhibit 8—February 28,2022 Memo) AGENCIES -NO COMMENTS/CONCERNS/OBJECTIONS 43. Department of Public Works-Engineering Division, Police Department, DLNR - Land Division, State Department of Health. AGENCIES -NO RESPONSE 44. Department of Parks and Recreation PUBLIC COMMENTS 45. Douglas Stephens (Planning Department Exhibit 9—February 21,2022 email) 46. Robert Brown (Planning Department Exhibit 10—April 11,2022 email) APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO AGENCY & PUBLIC COMMENTS 47. Applicant's Response to Agency Comments (Planning Department Exhibit 11 —April 7,2022 Letter) 48. Applicant's Response to Public Comments (Planning Department Exhibit 12 —April 7, 2022 Letter) REQUESTS FOR TIME EXTENSION AND AMENDMENT TO ALLOW USE OF A SURETY FOR REQUIRED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 09 8 (REZ 07-000075) SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA USE PERMIT (SMA 07-000024) APPLICANT: HAWAII ONEI INVESTORS, LLC (formerly Kona Heights,LLC) PROJECT: LA`IPALA MAKAI SUBDIVISION KAPALA`ALAEA 2nd, NORTH KONA, HAWAII, TMK: 7-7-008: 121 I. BACKGROUND The original Applicant, Kona Heights, LLC, was successful in rezoning the subject property, consisting of approximately 11 acres, into the Single-Family Residential-7,500 square feet(RS-7.5) zoning district on February 9, 2009 (Exhibit A— Ordinance 09 8)in support of the development of a proposed sixty-two (62)-lot single family residential subdivision. In further support of this 2009 rezoning action and due to the location of the property within the County's Special Management Area(SMA), the Leeward Planning Commission issued SMA 07-000024, also with an effective date of February 9, 2009. (Exhibit B—SMA 07-000024). The original Applicant, Kona Heights, LLC, relinquished the subject property through final foreclosure proceedings on August 29, 2012. The successor and current Applicant, Hawaii Onel Investors, LLC, acquired the subject property from the lender's nominee on August 1, 2013. The Applicant's letter of authorization in support of these amendment requests is found at Exhibit C. In support of both the rezoning and SMA applications, the Planning Director offered its favorable recommendation to the Leeward Planning Commission, which was then adopted as its recommendation on the rezoning application to the County Council. (Exhibit D-Planning Director's Recommendation Report) II. APPLICANT'S REQUESTS Time extensions to Condition E of Ordinance 09 8 and Condition 4 of SMA 07-024 Condition E of the change of zone ordinance and Condition 4 of the SMA Permit both required completion of the proposed subdivision development within five (5)years of its effective date, or February 9, 2014. Although considerable planning, design and other"soft" work was done to address the conditions of approval, actual physical construction of the subdivision did not commence. As such, pursuant to Condition Y and Condition 15 of the change of zone ordinance and SMA permit respectively, an administrative time extension to February 9, 2019 was sought(Exhibit E-Applicant request dated January 30, 2014) and approved by the Planning Director by letter dated July 24, 2014 (Exhibit F—Time Extension Administrative Approval). 1Page Planning Dept. Exhibit 1 Regrettably, in spite of a concerted and diligent effort to meet that deadline, the Applicant was not able to complete the subdivision. As such, and pursuant to Condition Y and Condition 15 of the respective approvals and on behalf of HAWAII ONE INVESTORS, LLC, ("Applicant"), we respectfully request an additional 5-year extension to February 9, 2024 by which to complete construction of the 62-lot single family subdivision as originally set forth in Condition E and Condition 4 (See Exhibits A and B). Amendment to Condition K of Ordinance 09 8 Condition K of Ordinance 09 8 requires the preparation of a drainage study with all recommended drainage improvements to be constructed prior to the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval of the proposed subdivision. As afforded by Ordinance 09 8 to other subdivision-related improvements such as utilities and roadways, the Applicant is requesting that Condition K be amended to allow for the option of bonding the drainage improvements or the use of other acceptable forms of surety in lieu of its actual construction, prior to the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval, as offered by the following suggested amendment to Condition K: K. A drainage study shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works. The recommended drainage improvements shall be constructed or secured by a bond or other acceptable forms of surety, meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to receipt of Final Subdivision Approval. The drainage study shall include potential impacts from the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway culverts. (added material underscored) The Subdivision Code provides landowners with the ability to enter into an agreement with the County for the construction of required subdivision improvements and utilities in lieu of the completion of its construction prior to Final Subdivision Approval. The agreement must be secured by an acceptable form of surety. Below are the specific code sections that provide for this opportunity: Section 23-82. Agreement to provide improvements and utilities. The owner of the subdivision shall submit an agreement to the director who shall refer the document to the corporation counsel for approval as to form and legality. The agreement shall specify that the subdivider shall make, install, and complete all required improvements and utilities to the satisfaction of the director of public works and when appropriate, the department of water supply, and shall also provide that: (1) If the subdivider fails to complete: (A) The required improvements within the time specified; and (B) Any additional conditions imposed for the granting of an extension to complete the required improvements and additional conditions with the extended time period; 2Page (2) If the subdivider fails to timely complete or abandons the subdivision prior to final approval; or (3) If the agreement is terminated for any of the grounds stated in the agreement; the department of public works and when appropriate, the department of water supply may complete the improvements and recover the full cost and expense thereof from the subdivider. Section 23-83. Bond. (a) The agreement as specified in section 23-82 shall be secured by a good and sufficient surety bond (other than personal surety), certified check or other security acceptable to the director and approved by the corporation counsel, in the sum equal to the cost of all the work required to be done by the subdivider as estimated by the director of public works and the manager, if the subdivision is within the scope of the department of water supply requirements. The surety bond shall be payable to the County and when appropriate to the department of water supply. The bond shall be conditioned upon the faithful performance of any and all work required to be done by the subdivider. The reasons for these requests and other associated information are outline in the pages that follow. III. NATURE OF REQUESTS On behalf of the original Applicant, Carlsmith Ball, LLC submitted a letter dated January 30, 2014 (Exhibit E), requesting the administrative time extensions described earlier, it noted the recent acquisition of the subject property by the successor and current Applicant on August 1, 2013. The request explains the prompt actions of the current Applicant to address off-site park requirements by meeting with the Departments of Planning and Parks and Recreation and working to develop a design for the park. It also noted the effort to coordinate with then adjoining landowner to develop a new subdivision access road to Alii Drive as defined as Alternative 1 under Condition H as well as to develop a new subdivision layout for the development. Since the approval of this administrative time extension by the Planning Director in 2014 (Exhibit F), the Applicant has made significant progress to complete the project, as demonstrated by its accomplishment of the following milestones but encountered a severe financial obstacle when it lost its source of funding near the end of 2019: 1. Planned Unit Development Permit No. 15-000032 (PUD 15-000032) The Planning Department issues PUD 15-000032 that approves the Applicant's subdivision design principles in order to promote a more pedestrian-oriented community by allowing for a series of exceptions to the minimum requirements of the Zoning and Subdivision Codes. In a letter, dated August 13, 2020 (Exhibit I), the Planning Director acknowledged that the project is still in compliance with the terms of PUD. 3Page 2. Subdivision Application No. 17-001732 (SUB 17-001732) By letter dated September 19, 2017, the Planning Department issues Tentative Approval for Phase 1 of La`ipala Makai PUD subdivision, consisting of 18 residential lots, 2 archaeological preserve lots, a 5,000 square-foot open recreational area, and roadway parcels. An Amended Tentative Approval (Exhibit J)was issued on October 25, 2018 to accommodate the construction of a new subdivision access road (Pi`ilani Street) on the adjoining makai property in compliance with Condition H- Alternative 1 of Ordinance 09 8. (Figure 3—Subdivision Map for New Access Road) Note that SMA Minor Use Permit(SMM 18-000393)was issued by the Planning Department on July 12, 2018 to allow for the construction of this new subdivision access road. 3. Subdivision infrastructure construction plans The Planning Department, by its letter dated February 13, 2019, approves the subdivision infrastructure construction plans for Phase 1 of La`ipala Makai PUD subdivision, which includes the new subdivision access road (Pi`ilani Street)that will directly connect the subdivision with Alii Drive. The Applicant intends to provide a surety for the construction of the required roadway, drainage and water systems for the entire subdivision, which the existing language within Condition K of Ordinance 09 8 would prohibit. Approval of the Applicant's requested amendment to Condition K would allow for the use of an acceptable surety to ensure completion of the drainage system rather than its completion prior to the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval as drainage systems are an integral part of a subdivision roadway system. 4. Construction of 3-acre neighborhood park adjacent to Laaloa Avenue A Final Environmental Assessment, prepared by the Applicant, and subsequent Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI)for the development of this park was issued by the Department of Parks and Recreation on June 25, 2018. Plan Approval for the proposed park was issued by the Planning Department on November 1, 2018. The Applicant secured a grading permit and was set to begin construction until funding for the balance of the project fell through. Current plans call for its construction upon the hopeful receipt of the required time extensions and in conjunction with the 3rd phase of the project. In spite of the above activities, the Applicant lost its funding to complete the subdivision and could not find alternative source within a timely matter. As such, it informed the Planning Department of this situation in December 2019. Given that situation, the Applicant regrettably asked the Department to withdraw its request for Final Subdivision Approval of Phase 1 as it sought a new funding source and to seek the necessary time extensions to its entitlements. 4Page In recent months, the handful of lenders have expressed an interest, but because of the uncertainty surrounding the entitlements, cannot make such a commitment without first having the extensions in place. In spite of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Applicant believes that with the required extensions, which enhances receipt of the required financing, the project can be developed within the extended period. Upon purchase of the subject property on August 1, 2013, Hawaii One 1 Investors, LLC placed a huge financial commitment and many months of consultation, negotiation, environmental review, design work and regulatory compliance to secure the necessary entitlements that will allow for the development of this project. Much of this upfront work was necessary in order to support construction of Phase 1 of the subdivision, which when completed, will help to support the completion of the remainder of the 62-lot subdivision. As such, the Applicant is requesting a five (5)year time extension from the effective date of the rezoning time extension ordinance to secure the necessary funding and complete construction of the project as required by Condition E of Ordinance 09 8 and Condition 4 of SMA 07-024. And with approval of the requested amendment to Condition K of Ordinance 09 8, the Applicant will have the opportunity to provide an acceptable form of surety to ensure the construction of the subdivision drainage system along with the subdivision's roadway and water systems as a means to secure Final Subdivision Approval, which then affords the Applicant additional opportunities to secure the necessary funding to complete this project. IV. PROJECT LOCATION The subject site consists of 11.05 acres and is identified by TMK: 7-7-008:121. The property is located mauka of Alii Drive, immediately adjacent to the south of Keauhou View Estates and White Sands Beach subdivisions and bordered to the east (mauka) of the proposed Kahului-Keauhou Parkway in Kapala`alaea 2, North Kona, Hawaii (Figure 1-Location Map). V. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Applicant has filed with the County an application for the subdivision of the 11-acre property into 62 single family residential parcels ranging in size from 3,082 to 6,501 square feet(Figure 2-La`ipala Makai Phase 1 Subdivision Plat Map). Three (3) additional parcels will be set aside either as an archaeological preserve, park and open space. In order to develop the subdivision with lot sizes smaller than the minimum 7,500 square feet allowed by the Zoning Code, the Applicant was successful in securing a Planning Unit Development(PUD)Permit(PUD 15-000032) on February 25, 2016 (Exhibit GPUD 15-032 Permit letter only). The purpose of the PUD to allow for smaller lot sizes is to promote a more pedestrian-oriented community that would not be possible with the current subdivision standards for roadway construction, and to combine 5Page smaller lot sizes with common open-space corridors and landscaped streetscapes that facilitate social interaction by its residents. rn C AKOW n Z T �v E CAACO.p'rA; V1UUh4U11ALA �; - Qh� a rn f �Y IR �V .4iUUFi4K Il��v� 5� KEAUHOU VIEW '�ooKAP ESTATES A D ,? x m x v PROJECT SITE G D AGF O v 0 LA M 0 pr Kahalutl Bay q Figure 1 —Location Map 6Page i a Wi Jim ■ kr h~ hal 111E �I F i f ■ s jw - � _s � z I ■ w 'r• ` � n g �J [ �Of'4L.y.Fl14e 7 ye��__® 1 M1� ''�r��� •, s i Y �i h'��. A..' —�rig t ' •"'�` w f -4— 7 £6� tl3t t ` -`•E h S' �'f'or� s� y� L'CCCYCCt7•' yE & e'B .'w .r� '�g _ � S � ��, 2 t [ �•� 333333r3333��� � s3� Iffulf J 311 aka Y h Vi Figure 2 -La`pala Makai —Phase 1 Subdivision Plat Map 7Page g a ° n ! $"M1 �.. c$ �*-21— ry' W � W Qpr.. p P4� � }� 'S ❑ .. L] t� OM to w I a N7 am ;qrr 3f— 5� a � �a �- sw �� g 'Q T �r �•I ! gg� i '�� $gg Q � r r N , a l r w 5 ^ .7 chi rr N fry ! h rr Llq g Ix ec• gS' � �k 6 4- tit 1R,I XR R.P-�i�iP - F:Y• '•� �_k• 7�N'l •J ___� - .• gra+s ,gp�"••-4.. `!•..... a,e°;" y7g•�AO iG ."r `L _ —14 5 195" w Figure 3 —Amended Subdivision Map for New Access Road 8Page VL REZONING and SMA CONDITIONS Rezoning time extensions require compliance with applicable prevailing codes, particularly the concurrency provision of the Zoning Code. Further, project's compliance with the conditions of the rezoning ordinance also needs to be discussed. As such, this section addresses those requirements. For the sake of brevity since conditions of approval associated with SMA 07-000024 are duplicative of conditions within the change of zone ordinance, the following discussion will be limited to conditions within Ordinance 09 08. Change of Zone Ordinance 09 08 (certain conditions are recited in part for brevity) A. The applicant, its successors or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all stated conditions of approval. • The property is owned by the Applicant. As such, it has and intends to continue to assume the responsibility of complying with all pertinent and substantive conditions and any amendments thereto of this rezoning ordinance. B. Prior to the issuance of a water commitment by the Department of Water Supply, the applicant shall submit the anticipated maximum daily water usage calculations as recommended by a registered engineer and a water commitment deposit in accordance with the "Water Commitment Guidelines Policy" to the Department of Water Supply within 180 days from the effective date of this ordinance. • The subject site has secured a total of fifty (5 0)water commitments at an average of 400 gallons per day per unit or a total allocation of 20,000 gallons per day. As required by Condition B, Aina Engineers Inc. has prepared water usage calculations for the proposed 62-lot subdivision that will follow LEED silver design/certification criteria that defines a baseline use of approximately 320 gallons per day for each residential unit or total allocation of 19,840 gallons. Note that two (2) additional lots within the proposed subdivision will be set aside as archaeological preserves with one (1) additional lot to be set aside as open space, all of which will not require water service. On January 4, 2022, the Applicant made the necessary payments to the Department of Water Supply to extend these water commitments to June 30, 2023 (Exhibit M). C. The applicant shall provide a recreational area of at least S,000 square feet at the Naniloa Street end of the proposed subdivision, which shall be maintained by the proposed subdivision's owners'association. Additionally, the applicant shall provide the recreational area with its own water meter and adequate water to serve park visitors, and support grass and landscaping. This recreational area shall not diminish the applicant's commitment to provide additional recreational areas and the requirements under Condition U herein. The applicant shall provide a minimum of a three-acre,public neighborhood park sufficient in size and quality to create a playing 9Page field for team sports such as baseball,football, and/or soccer on another parcel of land within one-quarter mile of this proposed project and all attributes and location of the neighborhood park shall be at the sole discretion of the Department of Parks and Recreation, and an additional two acres of mews on the same parcel as the three- acre,public neighborhood park. The mews may be private park area and shall be owned and maintained by the owner's association. • The preliminary subdivision plat map identifies Lot 22, consisting of 5,000 square feet, to be set aside as a park to be maintained and managed by the homeowners' association. This park will be assigned one 5/8-inch water meter for use by park guests. • The Applicant, in consultation with the Departments of Planning and Parks and Recreation, has designed and will construct a 3-acre neighborhood park on a County-owned parcel located within Alii Sunset subdivision located to the north of the proposed La`ipala Makai subdivision. A Final Environmental Assessment, prepared by the Applicant, and subsequent Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)for the development of this park was issued by the Department of Parks and Recreation on June 25, 2018. Plan Approval for the proposed park was issued by the Planning Department on November 1, 2018. As noted above, although a grading permit was secured for this project, work was postponed due to the loss of financing of the basic project. The Applicant anticipates receipt of the needed financing and thus would be in a position to construct the project in conjunction with the 3rd Phase of this project. D. The applicant shall implement and/or require implementation of water and energy conservation measures in the development of the houses within the proposed subdivision, utilizing measures similar to the LEED Standards of the U.S. Green Building Council, which shall be binding on the owners of the association and owners of all lots in the proposed subdivision. Compliance with this condition shall be verified by a LEED certified architect. • As required by Condition B, Aina Engineers Inc. has prepared water usage calculations for the proposed 62-lot subdivision that will follow LEED silver design/certification criteria that defines a baseline use of approximately 320 gallons per day for each residential unit or total allocation of 19,840 gallons, which does not exceed the average total daily water usage of 20,000 gallons allocated to the project by the Department of Water Supply. E. Final subdivision approval for the first subdivision phase shall be secured within five (5)years from the effective date of this ordinance. The first subdivision phase shall be defined as consisting of up to fifty (5 0) lots. • The following outlines the diligent efforts of the Applicant in its attempt to complete the proposed subdivision by the February 9, 2019 deadline established by Ordinance 09 08: 10 Page o Upon acquiring the subject property in August 2013, Applicant able to secure a five (5)year administrative time extension until February 9, 2019 by which to complete the proposed subdivision (Exhibit F-Time Extension Administrative Approval). o The subdivision application for La`ipala Makai-Phase 1, consisting of 18 single family residential lots, was submitted to the Planning Department on June 7, 2017; o Tentative Approval of the proposed Phase 1 subdivision issued by the Planning Department on September 19, 2017 (Exhibit I-PD Subdivision Tentative Approval); o Amended Tentative Approval issued on October 25, 2018, incorporating a new direct access roadway (Pi`ilani Street)from Alii Drive to the proposed subdivision (Exhibit J-PD Amended Subdivision Tentative Approval); o By letter dated September 17, 2018, the Planning Department grants a time extension until September 19, 2020 by which to comply with all conditions of the Amended Tentative Approval (Exhibit K-PD Time Extension to TA); and o Plans for the construction of the subdivision infrastructure and lot layout was approved by the County on February 13, 2019 (Exhibit L-PD Construction Plan Approval). _. Access to the development shall meet with the approval of the Department of Public Works. Access to the future Kahului-Keauhou Parkway shall not be allowed unless approved the Department of Public Works. Vehicular access to individual lots shall not be permitted from the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway. A gated vehicular emergency egress to the Kahului Keauhou Parkway may be installed if allowed by the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall construct a pedestrian pathway connecting a street within the project to the multipurpose path on the Kahului- Keauhou Parkway. • With the approval of subdivision construction drawings by the County, the Applicant has adhered to and satisfied this condition. G. During the construction of the proposed subdivision, the applicant shall cause vehicular construction traffic to utilize an access route across the property to the west and/or south. • The Applicant will comply with this condition by directing construction-related traffic through the adjoining property to the west that it also owns. 11Page H. The applicant shall provide road and traffic improvements as follows: Alternative I: Construct a new alternate access road from Alii Drive to the project through currently vacant property to the west or south, meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works. The road may be constructed as a minor or local street and may allow direct access from individual lots, and shall be dedicated to the County upon completion. It shall include a dedicated left turn lane at the AN Drive intersection. The road shall connect with a street in the project that provides a further stubout to the adjacent property to the south (TMK: 7-8-010:004). All construction required in Alternative I herein shall be completed or bonded before final subdivision approval for the first phase of the proposed project, or Alternative 2:Provide concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and appropriate drywells for drainage control from the proposed development along the mauka side ofNaniloa Street to Queen Kalama Street and then from Naniloa Street along the south side of Queen Kalama Street to AN Drive. These improvements shall include any necessary pavement widening retaining structures, signs, traffic markings, and streetlights, drainage improvements, and relocation of utilities meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works. All construction required in Alternative 2 herein shall be completed or bonded before final subdivision approval for the first phase of the proposed project. • On lands the Applicant owns adjacent to the project site (TMK: 7-7-008:001), Alternative 1 will be pursued through the construction of a new access roadway that will provide a direct connection with Alii Drive. This new access roadway secured an SMA Minor Use Permit(SMM 18-000393)for its construction from the Planning Department on July 12, 2018 and was subsequently approved on subdivision plans through the issuance of Amended Tentative Approval on October 25, 2018. Construction drawings for Phase 1 and this new access road were approved by the Planning Department on February 13, 2019. 1. Within the project area, the applicant shall provide: (1) A connection to Naniloa Street to the north. (2) One road stubout to the adjoining property to the south (TMK: 7-8-010:004). This stubout shall be sufficiently mauka in the proposed subdivision to avoid the Historical Preserve Area on TMK: 7-8-010:004. This stubout shall eventually connect to a mauka-makai connector road within TMK: 7-8-010:004 that shall intersect with the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway. This stubout shall be completed with the first subdivision phase of the proposed project even if insufficient water commitments are available to complete the entire project. (3) One stubout to the adjoining property to the west(TMK: 7-7-008:001) unless the applicant chooses to build Alternate I under Condition H. (4) Concrete curbs, gutters, appropriate drywells, and sidewalks for all streets within the proposed project which shall meet the County dedicable standards of the Department of Public Works. 12Page (5) Streets and stubouts within the proposed project that shall be constructed to County dedicable standards and shall be dedicated to, and accepted by, the County upon completion; and (6) Crosswalks) as determined by the Department of Public Works. • These roadway design requirements, as amended by Planned Unit Development (PUD)Permit 15-032, were incorporated within subdivision construction drawings approved by the County on February 13, 2019. J. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties. • Construction plans approved on February 13, 2019 reflect appropriate drainage facilities as required by the Department of Public Works. K. A drainage study shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works. The recommended drainage improvements shall be constructed, meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to receipt of Final Subdivision Approval. The drainage study shall include potential impacts from the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway culverts. • A DPW-approved site drainage plan was submitted in conjunction with the review and subsequent approval of the subdivision construction drawings approved by the County on February 13, 2019. All required drainage systems will be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Public Works. • Applicant is requesting that Condition K be amended to allow the option of deferring the construction of the subdivision's drainage system by entering into an agreement with the County, along with an acceptable form of surety that will ensure its construction in the timely manner after the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval. L. The proposed subdivision shall connect to the County sewer system. Any new sewer extension to the public sewer system requires the submittal of a sewer study by the applicant to the County of Hawaii Wastewater Division (COH-WWD). The sewer study is intended to define the wastewater flow contribution from the proposed site, evaluate the impact to the existing sewer system, and propose an appropriate sewer extension alignment based on the results of the sewer study. The sewer study shall be prepared in accordance with the City & County of Honolulu Design Standards. Design plans for construction of a proposed sewer extension shall also be submitted to the COH-WWD for review and approval. Documents shall be prepared in accordance with Hawaii County Code, Chapter 21-Sewers, Hawai`i Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 62—Wastewater Systems, and COH-WWD Sewer Standards. • The Applicant's engineering consultant, Aina Engineering Inc., prepared a sewer study that was approved by the Department of Environmental Management. It should be noted that on February 13, 2019, the County approved the infrastructure construction plans for the proposed subdivision, which included the sewer system. 13Page As such, the system will be constructed in conjunction with the balance of the infrastructure for the proposed subdivision. M. The applicant and its successors in interest shall be responsible for any noise abatement measures for the subject property, which may be required to qualify the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway for Federal funding. Until the completion of the Kahului- Keauhou Parkway through the subject property, covenants in all deeds to subject property, including deeds to individual units and to any lots subdivided from the subject property, and promotional and sales materials given to prospective purchasers, shall inform prospective owners of the following: "Plans for the area involve the construction of the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway within a right-of-way shown on the attached map. The, Kahului-Keauhou Parkway will be a major highway that is expected to carry a high volume of traffic. The County of Hawaii has determined that the construction of this highway is important to the proper development of Kona as a whole. The construction of the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway will create noise, dust, and other impacts. The contractor building the Parkway will be required to follow some regulations to reduce noise and dust, but some impacts will occur. After completion, traffic on the Kahului Keauhou Parkway will cause noise and other effects that must be expected from a busy roadway. A prospective purchaser who cannot accept the future construction of the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway in this area is advised to seek another area to reside. This property was rezoned on condition that if noise abatement measures between the Parkway and adjacent residences in this project must be taken to qualify the KahuluiKeauhou Parkway project for Federal funding, the residential owners would be required to pay for the noise abatement." The sales materials and covenants do not have to follow the exact wording of this condition but shall inform the prospective purchasers of the substance of this condition. • The Applicant acknowledges this condition and understands the obligations associated with potential noise abatement measures associated with the development of the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway and the noise implications associated with its development and use as a major highway. N. Comply with Chapter 11-55, Water Pollution Control, Hawai`i Administrative Rules, Department of Health, which requires an NPDES permit for certain construction activity. • The Applicant will comply with this condition. O. During construction, measures shall be taken to minimize the potential of both fugitive dust and runoff sedimentation. Such measures shall be in compliance with construction industry standards and practices utilized during construction projects of the State of Hawai`i. • This will be complied with by the contractor. 14Page P. Earthwork and grading shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sediment Control of the Hawai`i County Code. • This requirement will be adhered to. Approved construction plans, approved grading permits and construction best management practices will guide and manage construction activities under the inspectional eyes of the DPW. C>. A Data Recovery Plan for the two sites recommended for preservation (Sites 24842 and 24534) shall be submitted to the DLNR HPD for review and approval. A landscaped buffer shall be constructed around the sites. • The data recovery plan for these two archaeological sites was approved by the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD)by letter dated October 31, 2017. R. A Burial Treatment Plan for Site 24842 shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Planning Director in consultation with the DLNR-HPD and Hawaii Island Burial Council. The proposed mitigation treatment for the burial site shall be approved by the Hawaii Island Burial Council before detailed mitigation plans are finalized. A copy of the approved Burial Treatment Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the issuance of any land alteration permits. • The burial treatment plan for Site 24842 was approved by SHPD by letter dated May 8, 2017. S. Should any undiscovered remains of historic sites, such as rock walls, terraces, platforms, marine shell concentrations or human burials be encountered, work in the immediate area shall cease and the Department of Land and Natural Resources- Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-HPD) shall be immediately notified Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearance from the DLNR- HPD when it finds that sufficient mitigation measures have been taken. • The Applicant and its contractors will comply with this condition. T. To ensure that the Goals and Policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan are implemented, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Chapter II, Article 1, Hawaii County Code relating to Affordable Housing Policy. Prior to final subdivision approval, applicant shall have entered into an agreement with the county in a form approved by the Administrator of the Office of Housing and Community Development for satisfaction of its requirement under Chapter 11 and shall have provided security to the county, which security shall be in a form that is acceptable to the county in its sole discretion,for full satisfaction of its affordable housing requirement. • The Applicant began discussions with the Office of Housing and Community Development(OHCD)in the fall of 2018 with the intent to execute an agreement with the County in satisfaction of its affordable housing obligations under Chapter 11, Hawaii County Code, prior to the issuance of Final Subdivision 15Page Approval for Phase 1. Should these amendment requests be approved to allow for additional time by which to complete the project, the Applicant will diligently work towards an affordable housing agreement with OHCD that must be executed in order for Final Subdivision Approval to be issued for any phase of this development. U. The applicant shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation,fire,police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads.....The fair share contribution shall have a maximum combined value of$11,506.13 per single-family residential unit. The total amount shall be determined with the actual number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in this condition.... In lieu of paying the fair share contribution, the applicant may contribute land and/or construct improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation,fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development, subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning Director, upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the County Council. The applicant shall receive a credit against the fair share contribution required for road and traffic improvements outside of the proposed subdivision in the amount of the costs of construction as described in Condition H herein. • The Applicant will comply with this condition commensurate with the completion of individual phases of the subdivision. V Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fee Ordinance...conditions included herein shall be credit towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. • This is not applicable, inasmuch as such an ordinance has not been passed as of this date. W. The applicant shall comply with all applicable County, State and Federal laws, rules, regulations and requirements. • This has and will continue to be complied with by the Applicant and/or its construction consultants and contractors. X. An annual progress report shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the effective date of the ordinance...This condition shall remain in effect until all of the conditions of approval have been satisfied and the Planning Director acknowledges that further reports are not required • Although the condition requires the report be submitted `prior to the effective date of the ordinance," it was understood that the reports are usually required prior to the anniversary date of the effective date of the ordinance. The Applicant has been diligent in providing annual progress reports specific to the change of zone ordinance, but has been remiss in doing same for the SMA Permit. 16Page However, since the SMA conditions are duplicative of conditions within the change of zone ordinance, the Applicant trusts that the information provided in this request can be accepted as the 2020 annual progress reports for both the ordinance and permit. Y. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within this ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence.... 2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. 3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of the change of zone. 4. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Planning Director may initiate rezoning of the property to its original or more appropriate designation. • In this case, the Planning Director in a letter, dated July 24, 2014, granted the initial extensions to both Ordinance 09 08 and SMA 07-000024 to February 9, 2019 (Exhibit F). As additional time is needed, the Applicant is requesting an additional five (5)years to address the requirements of Conditions E and 14 (project completion) of these respective land use approvals. VII. JUSTIFICATION OF REQUEST Condition Y of the Ordinance 09 08 (Exhibit A) and Condition 15 of SMA 07-000024 (Exhibit B) outlined three (3) circumstances under which the Planning Director could consider an initial time extension request. These circumstances presumably also apply to an extension to be considered by the County Council and Leeward Planning Commission, with the recommendations of the Planning Director. As such, these circumstances and their justification follow. A. The non performance is the result of*conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of*the applicant, its successors or assigns, and that are not the result of*their fault or negligence. As noted in the request for the administrative time extension (Exhibit E), upon acquiring the subject property in August 2013, the Applicant took immediate steps to address the various conditions imposed upon the development that included complying with the off-site park requirement by engaging a local architectural design firm to develop park options for presentation to the County, as well as redesigning the subdivision layout. 17Page In the 7 years of its ownership of the property, the Applicant has: • Applied for, and secured the approval of PUD 15-032 that allowed for certain exceptions to the Zoning and Subdivision Codes in order to promote its pedestrian-friendly design for the subdivision; • Applied for and secured Tentative Approval of Phase 1 of La`ipala PUD Subdivision that will create 18 residential lots; • Negotiated with an adjoining landowner to secure the ability to construct a subdivision access road (Pi`ilani Street)that will provide direct access to Alii Drive; • Complete and secured approval of construction plans for the Phase 1 subdivision infrastructure as well as the new subdivision access road to Alii Drive; • Financed and prepared an environmental assessment for the 3-acre neighborhood park off of Laaloa Avenue, securing a Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI); • Designed neighborhood park and secured Final Plan Approval, with final construction drawings currently being prepared for approval by the County; • Completion of archaeological reports and mitigation plans in accordance with State Historic Preservation Division requirements with data recovery ongoing; and • Working to secure new source of financing to support the completion of subdivision infrastructure. The Applicant made such significant progress towards securing Final Subdivision Approval of Phase 1 that it actually made that request of the Planning Department, only to inform the department in December 2019 of the loss of financing, which was unexpected and sudden. The amendment requests will provide the Applicant with an additional 5 years by which to secure a new source of financing for the project, as well as to offer the option of a surety or complete construction of the required subdivision improvements in order to secure Final Subdivision Approval as permitted by the Subdivision Code. B. Granting of*the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. It should be noted that since the site was rezoned in 2009, there have been no significant changes to the land use regulatory structure affecting the subject site. There has been no amendment to the County General Plan. While the Kona Community Development Plan was amended, its outcome resulted in having certain provisions be deemed a"guideline" instead of a"mandate". There was also no significant amendment to the Special Management Area rule that would affect the project. As such, the general reasons for the Leeward Planning Commission's initial favorable recommendation, as outlined in the Planning Director's Recommendation report (Exhibit D) and the Director's administrative time extension approval (Exhibit F) are still applicable. 18Page The reasons (and further expanded herein) and their relationship to the present, included: • Consistency with the General Plan LUPAG map of Low Density Urban. The LUPAG map identifies the subject property and its immediately adjacent area Low Density Urban, which allows "Residential, with ancillary community and public uses, and neighborhood and convenience-type commercial uses; overall residential density maybe up to six units per acre." The proposed 62-lot La`ipala PUD Subdivision, if allowed to proceed, will establish a land use pattern consistent with the low density residential neighborhoods that characterize this part of North Kona along Alii Drive. • Consistency with the General Plan goals, policies, and standards relative to the economic and land use elements. The approved RS zoning, and the continued development of this 62-lot subdivision, would also be consistent with the goals, policies, and standards of the Housing and Land Use Elements of the General Plan. The project increases the overall housing stock adjacent to an established residential community along with neighborhood recreational amenities and appropriate infrastructure. Specifically, the more pertinent goals and policies follow: Housing Goals ➢ Attain a diversity of socio-economic housing mix throughout the different parts of the County. ➢ Maintain a housing supply which allows a variety of choice. ➢ Develop better places to live in Hawaii County by creating viable communities with decent housing and suitable living environments for our people. ➢ Improve and maintain the quality and affordability of the existing housing stock. ➢ Seek sufficient production of new affordable rental and fee-simple housing in the County in a variety of sizes to satisfactorily accommodate the needs and desires of families and individuals. 19Page Policies ➢ Increase rental opportunities and choices in terms of quality, cost, amenity, style and size of housing, especially for low and moderate income households. • Appropriate infrastructure such as water, wastewater, and access are available to support the proposed subdivision. As noted earlier, County water is available for the project; the project will connect to the County's sewer system; and access to the site and adjoining residential communities will actually be enhanced with the construction of a new access road (Pi`ilani Street)that will connect the subdivision and existing Naniloa Street with Alii Drive. • The site does not have any resource issues drainage, botanical, or avifaunal. The site is also within Zone X of the FIRM map. • Although the site has some archaeological features, appropriate mitigation has and/or will be taken prior to and/or during the construction phase of the project. All of the required archaeological protocols have been developed and approved by the SHPD. The required sites have been preserved via an approved Preservation Plan. The burials have also been addressed with an approved Burial Treatment Plan and incorporated into the current and any revised plans; and during the construction phase of the project, the required archaeological monitoring via a SHPD-approved monitoring plan will take place. The Kona Community Development Plan ("CDP")became effective on September 10, 2008 (Ordinance No. 08 116) and was not considered during the course of review of this rezoning action by the Planning Department, Leeward Planning Commission and Hawaii County Council due to the filing of the request in early 2008. Subsequent to these approvals, however, the County Council approved a slate of interim amendments to the CDP on September 18, 2019 that emphasized the CDP as providing a framework of guidance policies towards future development within the North Kona district rather than a series of mandates that actually hindered development in specific locations rather than promoting reasonable approaches to such development that in the end, accomplishes the very intent of what the CDP was attempting to achieve in the first place. Regardless, the Applicant offers the following discussion that demonstrates consistency of its time extension and drainage condition amendment requests with the CDP. 20Page The subject property is situated within the Kona Urban Area("KUA") and partially lies at the outward fringes of the Kahalu`u Neighborhood Transient Oriented Development(TOD) area as shown on the Official Concurrency Map (Figure 3- Portion of Official Transportation Network Map: Kahalu`u Area). Furthermore, the subject property does appear to fall within Concurrency Zones M and the Kahalu`u Makai Village, with two specific concurrency roadway segments situated adjacent to, but not within, the subject property. These two adjoining concurrency roadways include the proposed Kahului-Keauhou Parkway, classified as a secondary arterial, and Connector 9, a proposed minor collector roadway. R g IiLR s� - E` a Legend Proposed Roads,GlamlflcaMon'Propompd Tmn< UrW -COP,Local Trunk —CIJP,collector,major Secv4ary f x SCUP,collector.minor Transh Hub" 7(QLEA GP,allenal —GP.caltectar,major Yrdnsit Stalion' _ =GP,oallector,mirror 101)Type n Pedeatrian.giike Paths IcoPr F Neigtbor409d {' TYPE IE!Regional Cater ( _ Lane =Kona Urban Area Path C-39ural Town TODs y� •Pant-S —FAMitl§RW"y A +�Ped-sw Pad-trail z Shared Shailder Figure 4-Portion of Official Transportation Network Map: Kahalu`u Area Kahalu`u Makai Village TOD Portion of the subject property is situated at the outer fringe of the Kahalu`u Makai Village TOD, separated from the proposed transit station that defines the core of the TOD by the proposed Kahului-Keauhou Parkway and Collector 9, as shown in Figure 4 above. The Kahalu`u Makai Village transit station is sited to support the continued higher density single family residential, multiple family residential, commercial and resort-related development to the south of the subject property at Keauhou. The subject property, its current RS-7.5 zoning, and this request for a time 21Page extension to complete the proposed subdivision that has been underway for the last 11 years, should be functionally classified as"Infill" pursuant to Policy LU-2.8 that provides guidelines for rezoning actions and time extensions for properties outside of a TOD area but within the KUA. The guidelines and their relationship to the subject site/request are: a. Consistency with the LUPAG map. The site's RS-7.5 zoning and its proposed time extension continue to fall within the area designated for Low Density Urban uses. b. Infill. The site is designated Urban on the State Land Use map. The subject property is situated adjacent to the south of established subdivisions of White Sands Beach Estates and Keauhou View Estates subdivisions to the north, and existing single and multiple family residential zoning to the south as part of resort community of Keauhou. As such, this area satisfies the concept of "infill" by linking the established residential communities adjacent to the north of the subject property with the proposed resort-residential community adjacent to the south. The proposed construction of a new subdivision access road (Pi`ilani Street)that will eventually connect both of these residential communities to the north and south of the subject property further justifies the existing RS-7.5 zoning of the subject property, and its continued development through the approval of the requested time extensionsm as "infill". c. Greenfields Rezoning. This is not applicable, as by virtue of the previous RS- 7.5 zoning action prior to the adoption of the Kona CDP as well as the comments noted in"b" above, the subject site should not trigger a need to amend the Kona CDP. Connector 9 Condition F or Ordinance 09 8 specifies that no access from the proposed subdivision be permitted to the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway unless approved by the DPW. The proposed La`ipala Makai PUD subdivision, and associated subdivision construction drawings approved by DPW, does not permit the subdivision access road (Pi`ilani Street) from connecting to the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway, instead terminating in a cul-de-sac. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that Connector 9 will be situated on lands immediately adjoining the subject property to the south, on undeveloped lands currently zoned RS-7.5 and RM-3.5. Objective TRAN-2 Street Network Connectivity. With the proposed construction of the subdivision access road (Pi`ilani Street) through the proposed subdivision and providing a connection between Naniloa Street in the adjoining White Sands subdivision and Alii Drive and the future Connector 9, the proposed subdivision adheres to an objective of the CDP to develop a system of interconnected roads within Kona that will provide alternative transportation routes that will disperse automobile trips and reduce their length, while not compromising 22Page the through functions of arterials and major collectors with excessive intersections. Such interconnections will also serve to: (a) provide safe choices for drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians; (b) promote walking and bicycling; (c) connect neighborhoods to each other and to popular destinations, such as parks, among others; (d) provide opportunities for residents to increase their level of physical activity each day by creating walkable neighborhoods with adequate connections to destinations; (e) reduce vehicle miles traveled and travel time, thus improving air quality and mitigating the effects of auto emissions on the health of residents and the environment; (f) reduce emergency response times; (g) increase effectiveness of municipal service delivery; (h) restores arterial street capacity to better serve regional long-distance travel needs; and (i) provide increased emergency evacuation opportunities. Concurrency Another major component of the CDP is the concept of infrastructure concurrency. This concept is embodied principally in Figure 4-3—Official Concurrency Map of the CDP. As previously mentioned, the subject property appears to be situated within Concurrency Zones M and the Kahalu`u Makai Village, with two specific concurrency roadway segments situated adjacent to, but not within, the subject property. These two adjoining concurrency roadways include the proposed Kahului- Keauhou Parkway, classified as a secondary arterial, and Connector 9, a proposed minor collector roadway. Policy TRAN-6.1 regarding the Official Concurrency Map states that"Concurrency requirements shall be determined by HCC§25-2-46 and be generally consistent with the Official Concurrency Map, and be informed by a TIAR when applicable." Both of these concurrency roads are not identified as "Prioritized Road Improvements" according to Policy TRAN-62. The Applicant has commissioned SSFM International to prepare an updated Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) dated October 2021 for the 62-lot subdivision (see Exhibit N). Of note is that the study concludes that"The Covid-19 pandemic led to a 14-day quarantine of incoming travelers and the closure of non-essential businesses in the State of Hawaii beginning in March 2020. Towards the end of 2020, businesses began reopening, and non-essential employees began going back to work. Tourism slowly started to return as well. Beginning in the 2021 school year, Hawaii public schools reinstated in-person learning. As a result of this, and in comparing 202124- hour counts from along AN Drive, 2021 peak hour counts are assumed to reflect typical traffic volumes on a school day." 23Page The study finds that all studied intersections in the vicinity of the project site currently operate at an acceptable level of service and delays and recommends that no mitigation is needed for the existing conditions and future traffic conditions extending till 2031. However, by 2041, the northbound approach at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue during the AM peak hour and the southbound approach at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue during the PM peak hour are anticipated to operate at LOS E as a result of the increased traffic volume and the all-way stop-control at this intersection. Various mitigation measures for the Future (2041). The volume to capacity ratio (v/c)for the northbound and southbound approaches at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue are 0.99 and 0.98, respectively. When the v/c ratio reaches 1.00, the movements at this intersection will operate at LOS F. This is due to the traffic volume reaching the roadway capacity. Although the traffic analysis shows these movements operating at an acceptable LOS letter grade, this intersection should be monitored and improved if the LOS deteriorates to unacceptable levels. In summary, the updated TIAR concludes that the"...Laipala Makai project will have little impact to traffic delay at the AN Drive at Queen Kalama Avenue and the Queen Kalama at Naniloa Drive intersections. At the proposed intersection of the project driveway and Alii Drive, a single-lane entrance and a single-lane exit will work acceptably. Traffic operations show that the all-way stop-control at AN Drive and Laaloa Avenue will result in movements that operate at LOS E in Future (2041) Without Project and Future (2041) With Project conditions. The 8-Hour (Warrant 1 Condition B) and 4-Hour (Warrant 2) traffic signal warrants were satisfied and the resulting intersection analysis with a traffic signal with permitted phasing resulted in acceptable LOS for the intersection and movements. The future widening of Route 11 and/or the completion of the AN Highway extension will likely lower the traffic volume at this intersection, resulting in better traffic operation at this intersection. It is recommended that this intersection be monitored, and the installation of a traffic signal be considered if needed. The v/c ratio for the northbound and southbound approaches at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue will also be approaching LOS F in Future (2041). The north-south capacity will need to be increased through the widening of Route 11 from Henry Street to Kamehameha III Road or the construction of the AN Highway extension, both of which have been planned for many years." C. Granting of*the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of*the change of zone or the SMA Use Permit. As noted in the discussion in "B" above, the general reasons for the Leeward Planning Commission's initial favorable recommendation still prevail. Its reasons, as expanded further in "B" above, were: • Consistency with the General Plan LUPAG map of Low Density Urban. • Consistency with the General Plan goals, policies, and standards relative to the economic and land use elements. 24Page • Appropriate infrastructure such as water, wastewater, and access are or will be made available. • No irresolvable issues relating to drainage, botanical, or avifaunal. • Having appropriate archaeological/cultural safeguards or completing appropriate mitigation measures. It is thus maintained that the reasons used to support the existing zoning back in 2009 still apply to the requested time extensions. It should be noted, however, that since the RS-7.5 zoning was approved in 2009, there have been two (2) substantive changes to the Zoning Code that relate to project of this nature. One was the adoption of the concurrency provision, Section 25-2-46. That provision requires that all rezoning, including time extension, address traffic, potable water, and civil defense siren concerns. And as discussed below, the project meets these tests. Relative to traffic and in satisfaction of the concurrency provision, an updated TIAR was conducted as earlier explained, concluding that the proposed 62-lot subdivision will have little near-term impact upon traffic movements at intersections located within the immediate vicinity provided that signalization of the Alii Drive-Laaloa Avenue intersection may be warranted by 2041 with or without the project. Likewise, widening of Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway)to accommodate the increase of north and south bound traffic may be necessary and should be monitored for possible installation of traffic signals. Future conditions at these intersections will be influenced by the construction of the Alii Highway and the widening of Route 11, so these intersections should be monitored and improved as deemed necessary. County water for the project is still available, and the applicant has paid its current commitment deposit. The project will also connect to a privately operated wastewater system that services the Keauhou area. Further, there are two (2) civil defense sirens in the immediate area, one located in the White Sands Beach Estates subdivision approximately 1,450 feet to the north from the subject property, and a second siren located approximately 3,100 feet to the south near Kahalu`u Beach Park. Should Civil Defense require an additional siren to be situated within the proposed subdivision, the Applicant will comply. The other provision relates to allowance and management of Short-Term Vacation Rental ("STVR")in certain areas as outlined in Section 25-4-16 of the Zoning Code. The subject property is not situated within an area designated for Resort uses or as a Resort Node. Therefore, STVRs are prohibited within the proposed 62-lot subdivision. Coastal Zone Management/Special Management Area Like the conditions within the change of zone ordinance, the Applicant has demonstrated continued compliance with all conditions of the accompanying SMA Use Permit with the exception of timely completion of the 62-lot subdivision. The Applicant therefore takes the position that granting of the requested time extension 25Page will not have any substantial adverse impacts on the surrounding area, nor will its approval be contrary to the objectives and polices of Chapter 205A, HRS relating to Coastal Zone Management and Rule No. 9 of he Planning Commission relating to the Special Management Area. The proposed action will not create significant adverse impacts upon nearby and immediately adjacent properties. The project site is approximately 11.054-acres in size and located approximately 11 miles south of the Kona International Airport at Keahole and four miles south of Kailua-Kona. The property is overgrown with vegetation, currently vacant and located outside of the Kahaluu Historic District. The White Sands Beach Estates and Keauhou View Estates are zoned RS-7.5 and located adjacent to the north of the project site. Lands to the west(makai) of the property are zoned A-5a and will used as the main subdivision access road ("Pi`ilani Street). The Kahului-Keauhou Parkway (Alii Highway)borders the property to the east(mauka). Lands south of the project site are zoned RS-7.5 and RM-3.5. While the proposed development, with appropriate and required mitigation measures, will not have a direct impact upon coastal recreational resources, review of developments within the Special Management Area must also consider the cumulative impacts of such developments upon these resources. With the Applicant's continued adherence to the conditions of approval of both the rezoning ordinance and SMA permit and implementation of construction best management practices during the course of its development, the project will not substantially affect scenic vistas or viewplanes of nearby residents nor have a significant adverse impact on coastal recreational or visual resources to the shoreline and coastal ecosystems. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives and policies as provided by Chapter 205A, HRS, and Special Management Area guidelines contained in Rule No. 9 of the Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure. County water is available to the project site from an existing 6-inch waterline within Queen Kalama Avenue, approximately 150 feet from the parcel. According to the Applicant, the project is registered with the U.S. Green Building Council as a LEED project and has committed that LEED design criteria will be applied to the project to lower water demands than County requirements, as demonstrated by the submittal of data and calculations prepared by a registered professional engineer to support the LEED design criteria in accordance with the maximum potable water allocation to be provided by the County's water system. The project will connect to the County wastewater system. Any impacts from soil erosion and runoff during site preparation and construction phases can be adequately mitigated through compliance with existing regulations and proper construction practices. Air emissions generated during the construction phase for the proposed project will be mitigated by existing construction regulations. With these precautionary measures in place, the proposed development is not anticipated to have any substantial adverse effects upon nearby coastal resources or the surrounding environment. The Applicant continues to adhere to and implement conditions of 26Page approval for the project that will ensure that impacts on coastal resources are minimized. A survey titled Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK: 7-7-08: 121, Land of Kapalaalaea 2,North Kona District, Island of Hawaii was prepared by Haun and Associates in January, 2006 (Appendix B). The archaeological inventory survey identified 14 sites assessed as significant for their information content. Nine sites were recommended for mitigation through data recovery, and two sites were recommended for preservation. The plans for data recovery will be detailed in a Data Recovery Plan prepared for DLNR-SHPD review and approval. Specific plans for preservation and maintenance of a burial feature have been incorporated with a detailed in a Burial Treatment Plan accepted by the DLNR-SHPD and the Hawaii Island Burial Council. The project will not impact the preservation sites. A protective buffer(fence) will be established around the sites. A study titled Cultural Impact Study/Assessment, Laipala Heights, Kapalaalaea Ahupuaa, District of North Kona, Hawaii Island was prepared by Kaimipono Consulting Services LLC in December 2006. The study concluded that "while evidence of ancient or traditional cultural practices still exists on the project lands, there does not appear to be any evidence of any ongoing traditional cultural practices, except perhaps fishing, which, while not directly impacted by the project, may indirectly impact this resource." Vegetation at the site is characterized by koa haole scrub land. A Survey of Botanical, Avian and Terrestrial mammalian Species for the proposed Laipala Heights Subdivision, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii prepared by Rana Productions in 2006 identified 36 plant species of which two were indigenous. No hoary bats were detected during the field survey. The avian survey identified 224 birds of fourteen different non-native species. There were no species of flora or fauna currently listed as endangered, threatened or proposed for listing under either the State or Federal endangered species programs. The property is located in Zone "X", an area outside of the 500-year flood plain. A drainage study has been prepared to include a flood study to determine whether the property may be inundated by the design discharge from the proposed culverts crossing Kahului to Keauhou Parkway and incorporated within construction drawings approved by the County. According to the applicant, there is no evidence of any traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the site or nearby area, nor existence of any known valued cultural, historical or native resources. The proposed development remains consistent with the County General Plan and the Zoning Code. The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG)Map designates the subject property for Low Density Urban uses, consistent with its current state of development as defined by its approved zoning and PUD and pending subdivision application with approved construction plans. 27Page Access to the project site will be from Alii Drive via the extension of the Naniloa Street stub-out at Queen Kalama Avenue and a new access road (Pi`ilani Street), all of which are shown on the subdivision plans and approved subdivision construction drawings. As required by the Department of Public Works (DPW), roadway connections to adjoining parcels and vehicular access to individual lots shall be prohibited from Kahului to Keauhou Parkway. However, a gated vehicular emergency egress to Kahului to Keauhou Parkway may be installed. In view of the Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" and "Ka Pa'akai 0 Ka 'Aina" decisions, the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights must be addressed. These rights must be addressed in terms of the cultural, historical, and natural resources and the associated traditional and customary practices of the site. Studies prepared in support of the project during the land use entitlement process found no valuable cultural, historical, and natural resources within the subject property. A Data Recovery Plan and a Burial Treatment Plan has been approved by the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) and its recommendations have and will be implemented in a manner meeting with the approval of SHPD. There is no evidence that the flora in the area are particularly desired or used for cultural practices. According to the botanical and archaeological studies submitted by the applicant and with the implementation of approved archaeological mitigation measures, the project will not adversely impact botanical and archaeological resources in the area. The applicant has stated that there is no evidence of any traditional or customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the subject property, nor existence of any known valued cultural, historical or native resources in the area. Thus, it is believed that the project would have no adverse impact relative to the cultural and historical resources of the area. To the extent to which traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights are exercised, the proposed action will not affect traditional Hawaiian rights. Based on the above findings, the Applicant maintains that allowing for the continued development of the proposed subdivision and related improvements will not have any substantial adverse impacts on the surrounding area, nor will its approval be contrary to the objectives and policies of Chapter 205A, HRS, relating to Coastal Zone Management and Rule No.9 of the Planning Commission relating to the Special Management Area. VIII. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS IN JUSTIFICATION OF REQUESTS As extensively outlined within this request, the Applicant finds that it has made a substantial commitment of time and resources to comply with all of the conditions of approval of both Ordinance 09 8 and SMA No. 07-000024 to the extent that it was requesting the issuance of Final Subdivision Approval from the Planning Department as late as December 2019 and ready to proceed with its construction until project financing was lost. The scope of the Applicant's requests is limited to an extension of time of five (5)years for both the rezoning ordinance and the SMA permit to secure Final Subdivision Approval and to amend Condition K of Ordinance 281Page 09 8 to allow for the option of securing subdivision approval through the use of a surety to ensure the timely construction of subdivision-related infrastructural improvements. After the acquisition of the subject property in August 2013, the Applicant has faithfully pursued the development of the 62-lot La`ipala PUD subdivision as approved by the Leeward Planning Commission and the County Council to the extent that the original reasons for granting of both Ordinance 09 8 and SMA 07-000024 are still relevant and appropriate. 291Page Receipt eHawaii.gov Payments Convenient and secure payrr eats for Hawaii state and city&county governments V Payment Confirmed 'I hank yruti for your payment!All email Cpr3fjrmzL1on wlll qe sem to y+: i I aw was your payment experience? }Continue M Receipt Reference ID 3561598 ALathorizatton Code 61152838 Transaction Date}Time 6 Jan 2022 8:18 HST Item Price Property Ta x:77 656 5 NANILCA STREET $12,023.07 Rif 1D.'3-7-7-008-121-0500-000 Soruice Fee $3.50 Ref 0.3-T--7-008-121-0600-000 Tota! $12,026,57 Payment Information Contact Name Arra Murillo Phone Number 805-986-4114 Customer Type Business Accou n t Type Checkicg Email ana" arsgatehorne.torn Account Holder's Full Narne Aldersgate Investment Bank Name Wells Fargo I-)I':-PPCA-6-195690 COUNTY OF HAWAII 2021-2022 REAL PROPERTY TALC BILL COUNTY OF HAWAEI FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2421 TO JUKE 10,2022 REAL PROPERTY TALI DIVISION KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS AUPVNI CENTER IMPORTANT INFORMAT.[QN,QN REVERSE SIDE + 4F 141 PAUAHI STREET SUITE 4 - HILO,HI 98720.422$ GENERAL PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS-* --- TELEPHQNE (9t>8}961-8282 1.MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: 7ELEP ONE,(8MI9 1-3282 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 2.TO MAIL REMITTANCE: ENCLOS E BOTTOM PORT ION AND DEEP UPPER SECTIQf� FOR YQUR RECORDS. 3.70 PAY IN PERSON: "!' .7•pr04$•1Y9.000r7�fk0 BRING ENTIRE NOTICE TO THE COUNTY OF HAWAI1, 1663]�$d•"G50"Hi,ilyi"1135+rr+.+.. [1'JX}ALL FORA1kf3C 931 REAL FROPERTY TAX DIVISION. HAWIUI ONI~1 INVESTORS LIX- 4,THIS BILL IS FOR THE ENTIRE AMOUNT DUE ON THE 300 E ESPLANADE DR STB 1550 PROPERTY AND NOT PRORATED ACWROING TO OXNAM)"910' ,,1291 OWNERSHIP, Illy.Itlll11111„II1,11111d111 loll II1*11+Ily,1-11,-111111111 ATTENTION You may pay your real property tax bill unlFne at: Goaw- rllfss httor:Ilgayments.ellawadi. oylgrop.-r axlhawaii —� ;1 [71111e.� CredIt/debit cards are not accepted at our . H1Io or Kona atrices or over the phone. HATCXP13UD TUC MAP KEYIPARCEL ID PAYMENT PRION CURRENT TOTAL AMOUNT RUE DATE YEARS YEAR DUE NOW 3-7-7-008-121-0000-001) 0812312021 $ .4D $ 20,819.16 $ 2x,818-16 $ '10,409.58 PERIon DESCRIPTION TAX DUE DATE TAX AMOUNT PENALTY INTERFST OTHER TOTAL 2021-1 Real Property Of QX2 021 14,409.58 C0 .0C .04 $10.409„59 2021-2 Real Ptaperty 0212212022 141409,58 t;0 .0C Q0 $10.409,59 TOTAL.AMOUNTS DUE. 20,819.16 -00 .00 .00 $24,819.16 PROPERTY ADDRESS. 77 6&65 HANILOA STREET LESSEE.IF ANY: pWPFRTY DWNFR.HAWAII ON El IWL$TORS LLC 4 0' t .................................................—...........,,.....,.---------—-------------------------------- ......................._.........................................--..,..............,.,.,...--, -..------...----................_..... ... Pla9se Ioid an perfaration BEFORE:tearing PLEASE DF-TACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT ti RF-RPC A-5 COUNTY OF HAWAII � REAL. PROPERTY TAx DIVISION Check here for billing address change (sea reverse) AUPUNI CENTER 101 PAUAHI STREET SUITE 4 HILO,HI 96720-4224 TE LF PHONE; (84B)1161-8282 TAX MAP KEWPARCEL ID PAYMENT PRIOR CURRENT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE DATE YEARS YEAR DUE NOW 3-7-7-000.121-0000-000 0812312021 $ -IJU $ 20,819.16 $ 20,815).16 $ '10,409.58 MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO AMOUNT HAWAII PLA C INVESTORS STE 15 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE RAJA: 30[]E ESPE.,4NA❑5 QR STE 1550 0ANRR0 C+A WOJ6-1281 1 III II I I IIIII II III III I II I I II I I!III IEII IIII 11111 IIII Irlll IIIII IIIII 11111 IN11 Illll I III I1il 377©081E10O0000010010409580020611160Oa08 i COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII BILL NO. 322 (Draft 3) ORDINANCE NO. 09 8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-3 (NORTH KONA ZONE MAP), ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2005 EDITION), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL. - 5 ACRES (A-5a) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- 7,500 SQUARE FEET (RS-7.5) AT KAPALAALAEA 2", NORTH KONA,HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY: 7-7- 008:121- BE -7- 008:121_BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Section 25-8-3, Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005 Edition), is amended to change the district classification of property described hereinafter as follows: i The district classification of the following area situated at Kapalaalaea 2"d, North Kona, Hawaii, shall be Single Family Residential- 7,500 square feet (RS?.5): Beginning at a found '/z" iron rebar, being the-Northwest corner of this herein- described tract of land, being the Southeast corner of Lot No. 2 of White Sands Beach Estates Subdivision (File Plan NG. 1480) and the Southwest terminus point of Nandua Street,the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Surrey Triangulation Station"KAHELO" being 11,680.76 feet South and 5565.64 feet East, and tanning by azimuths clockwise, measured from true South: Thence for the next twenty-three (23)courses following along the middle of stonewall, along Land Commission Award No. 4452, Apana 2 to H. Kalama: 1. 2550 22' 40" 175.85 feet along File Plan No. 1480 to a found "X" in rock; Thence for the next thirteen (13) courses following along Keauhou View Estates Phase I (File Plan No. 2268) and Phase III (Filo Plan No. 2275): 2. 2530 26' 00" 46.03 feet to a fo°ind nail, 3. 2540 53' 00' 50.09 feet to a found nail; 4. 2520 43' 00" 65.74 feet to a found nail; EXHIBIT A 5. 2560 34' 00" 69.20 feet to a.found nail; 6. 2600 02' 00" 42.91 feet to a found nail; 7. 255° 30' 00" 61.67 feet to a found nail; 8. 2520 41' 00" 24.74 feet to a found `/z" iron pipe; 9. 2520 17' 00" 70.94 feet to a found nail; 10. 249° 00' 00" 22.68 feet to a found nail; 11. 2450 53' 00" 36.24 feet to a found nail; 12. 2490 31' 00" 41.22 feet to a found nail; 13. 2460 40' 00" 77.55 feet to a found nail; 14. 253° 11' 00" 60.37 feet to a found nail: Thence for the next nine (9) courses following along Keauhou View Estates Phase VI (File Plan No. 2316): 15. 2530 11' 00" 42.16 feet to a found nail; 16. 2500 48' 00" 71.12 feet to a found nail; t 17, 2410 45' 00" 9.19 feet to a found nail; 18. 2490 05' 00" 11.04 feet to a found nail; 19. 239" 25' 00" 22.98 feet to a found nail; 20, 234° 54' 00" 37.47 feet to a found nail; 21. 237" 03' 00" 34.58 feet to a found nail; 22. 229° 36' 00" 15.00 feet to a found nail; 23. 238° 39' 00" 3.04 feet to a found nail in the West line of Parcel 18, being Kahului-Keauhou Parkway; Thence for the next two (2) courses following along said Parcel 18, being Kahului.- Keauhou Parkway Alii Parkway): 24, 3540 55' 57" 47.45 feet to a found nail: 2 r 25. 3550 15' 00" 496.27 feet io a found 1/2" iron pipe in concrete at the middle of a stone wail; Thence for the next twenty-six (26) courses following along the middle of a stone wall, along Royal Patent No. 6856, Land Commission Award 7713, Apana 6 to V. Kamamalu: 26. 700 06' 21" 35.73 feet to a found nail; 27. 740 25' 57" 48.88 feet to a found nail; 28. 740 55' 25" 48.63 feet to a found nail; 29. 74° 22' 26" 34.12 feet to a found nail; 30. 710 41' 46" 17.54 feet to a found nail; 31. 790 13' 10" 28.28 feet to a found nail; 32. 70° 50' 19" 17.01 feet to a found nail; 33. 710 04' 01" 29.36 feet to a found nail; 34. 70° 11' 49" 42.74 feet to a found nail. 35. 650 24' 10" 16.68 feet to a found nail; 36. 730 04' 27" 39.19 feet to a found nail; 3'7. 74° 15' 41" 40.32 feet to a found nail; 38. 730 52' 16" 85.80 feet to a found nail; 39. 690 55' 37" 36.94 feet to a found nail; 40. 810 19' 54" 20.96 feet to a found nail; 41. 710 59' 42" 13.61 feet to a found nail; 42. 730 26' 45" 32.81 feet to a found nail; 43. 670 05' 11" 93.29 feet to a found nail; 44. 730 03' 53" 24.94 feet to a found nail; 45. 720 48' 22" 39.75 feet to a found nail; 46. 760 08' 18" 17.99 feet to a found nail; 3 a 47. 61c 33' 46" 20.42 feet t, a found nail; 48. 620 19' 19" 36.10 feet to a found nail; 49. 650 46' 32" 13.81 feet to a found nail; .50. 820 14' 49" 19.81 feet to a found nail; 51. 650 04' 39" 14,87 feet to a found nail; (hence for the next three (3) courses following along Lot No. 3-C, being the West line of this herein-described tract: 52. 1500 00' 00" 456.55 feet to a found %2" rebar with cap,- Thence, ap;Thence, following a curve to the right with a radius of 150.00 feet, the chord azimuth and I distance being: { 53. 1600 31' 00" 54.76 feet to a found 1/2" rebar with cap; 54. 1710 02' 00" 15.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing an area of 11.05 acres, more or. less. All as shown on the map attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 25-2-44, Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005 Edition), the County Council finds the following conditions are: I t (1) Necessary to prevent circumstances which may be adverse to the public health, safety and welfare; or (2) Reasonably conceived to fulfill needs directly emanating from the land use proposed with respect to: (A) Protection of the public from the potentially deleterious effects of the proposed use, or (B) Fulfillment of the need for public service demands created by the proposed use. A. The applicant, its successor or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all stated conditions of approval. B. Prior to the issuance of a water commitment by the Department of Water Supply, the applicant shall submit the anticipated maximum daily water usage calculations 4 ' as recommended by a registered engineer and a water commitment deposit in accordance with the "Water Commitment Guidelines Policy" to the Department of Water Supply within 180 days from the effective date of this ordinance. C. The applicant shall provide a recreational area of at least 5,000 square feet at the Naniloa Street end of the proposed subdivision, which shall be maintained by the proposed subdivision's owners' association. Additionally, the applicant shall provide the recreational area with its own water meter and adequate water to serve park visitors, and support grass and landscaping. This recreational area shall not diminish the applicant's commitment to provide additional recreational areas and the requirements under Condition U herein. The applicant shall provide a minimum of a three-acre, public neighborhood park sufficient in size and quality to create a playing field for team sports such as baseball, football, and/or soccer on another parcel of land within one-quarter mile of this proposed project and all attributes and location of the neighborhood park shall be at the sole discretion of the Department of Parks and Recreation, and an additional two acres of mews on the same parcel as the three-acre, public neighborhood park. The mews may be i private park area and shall be owned and maintained by the owner's association. D. The applicant shall implement and/or require implementation of water and energy conservation measures in the development of the houses within the proposed subdivision, utilizing measures similar to the LEED Standards of the U.S. Green Building Council, which shall be binding on the owners of the association and owners of all lots in the proposed subdivision. Compliance with this condition shall be. verified by a LEED certified architect. E. Final subdivision approval for the first subdivision phase shall be secured within five (5) years from the effective date of this ordinance. The first subdivision phase shall be defined as consisting of up to fifty (50) lots. F. Access to the development shall meet with the approval of the Department of Public Works. Access to the future Kahului-Keauhou Parkway shall not be allowed unless approved the Department of Public Works. Vehicular access to individual lots shall not be permitted from the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway. A gated vehicular emergency egress to the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway may be installed if allowed by the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall construct a pedestrian pathway connecting a street within the project to the multipurpose path on the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway. G. During the construction of the proposed subdivision, the applicant shall cause vehicular construction traffic to utilize an access route across the property to the west and/or south. H. The applicant shall provide road and traffic improvements as follows: Alternative 1: Construct a new alternate access road from. Alii Drive to the project through currently vacant property to the west or south, meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works. The road may be constructed as a 5 minor or local street and may allow direct :te:,ess from individual lots; and shall be dedicated to the County upon completion. It shall include a dedicated left turn lane at the Alii Drive intersection. The road shall connect with a street in the project that provides a further stubout to the adjacent property to the south (TMK: 7-8-010:004). All construction required in Alternative 1 herein shall be completed or bonded before final subdivision approval for the first phase of the proposed project, or Alternative 2: Provide concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and appropriate drywells for drainage control from the proposed development along the mauka side of Naniloa Street to Queen Kalama Street and then from Naniloa Street along the south side of Queen Kalama Street to Alii Drive. These improvements shall include any necessary pavement widening retaining structures, signs, traffic markings, and streetlights, drainage improvements, and relocation of utilities meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works. All construction required in Alternative 2 herein shall be completed or bonded before final subdivision approval for the first phase of the proposed project. I. Within the project area, the applicant shall provide: (1) A connection to Naniloa Street to the north. (2) One road stubout to the adjoining property to the south (TMK: 7-8-010:004). This stubout shall be sufficiently mauka in the proposed subdivision to avoid the Historical Preserve Area on TMK: 7-8-010:004. This stubout shall eventually connect to a mauka-makai connector road within TMK: 7-8-010:004 that shall intersect with the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway. This stubout shall be completed with the first subdivision phase of the proposed project even if insufficient water commitments are available to complete the entire project. � p p j i (3) One stubout to the adjoining property to the west (TMK: 7-7-008:001) unless the applicant chooses to build Alternate 1 under Condition H. (4) Concrete curbs, gutters, appropriate drywells, and sidewalks for all streets within the proposed project which shall meet the County dedicable standards of the Department of Public Works. (S) Streets and stubouts within the proposed project that shall be constructed to County dedicable standards and shall be dedicated to, and accepted by, the County upon completion; and (6) Crosswalk(s) as determined by the Department of Public Works, J. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties. I K. A drainage study shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works. The recommended drainage improvements shall be constructed, meeting with the approval of the Department of Public 6 Works prior to receipt of Final Subdivisiur. Approval. The drainage study shall include potential impacts froin the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway culverts. I L. The proposed subdivision shall connect to the County sewer system. Any new sewer extension to the public sewer system requires the submittal of a sewer study by the applicant to the County of Hawaii Wastewater Division (COH-WWD). The sewer study is intended to define the wastewater flow contribution from the proposed site, evaluate the impact to the existing sewer system, and propose an appropriate sewer extension alignment based on the results of the sewer study. The sewer study shall be prepared in accordance with the City & County of Honolulu Design Standards. Design plans for construction of a proposed sewer extension shall also be submitted to the COH-WWD for review and approval. Documents shall be prepared in accordance with Hawaii County Code, Chapter 21 — Sewers, Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 62 — Wastewater Systems, and COH-WWD Sewer Standards. M. The applicant and its successors in interest shall be responsible for any noise abatement measures for the subject property, which may be required to qualify the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway for Federal funding. Until the completion of the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway through the subject property, covenants in all deeds to subject property, including deeds to individual units and to any lots subdivided from the subject property, and promotional and sales materials gives: to prospective purchasers, shall inform prospective owners of the following: "Plans for the area involve the construction of the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway within a right-of-way shown on the attached map. ,The,Kahului-Ke auhou Parkway will be a major highway that is expected to carry a high volume of traffic. The County of Hawaii has determined that the construction of this highway is important to the proper development of Kona as a whole. The construction of the Kahului- Keauhou Parkway will create noise, dust, and other impacts. The contractor building the Parkway will be required to follow some regulations to reduce noise and dust., but some impacts will occur. After completion, traffic on the Kahului- Keauhou Parkway will cause noise and otter effects that must be expected from a busy roadway. A prospective purchaser who cannot accept the future construction of the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway in this area is advised to seek another area to reside. This property was rezoned on condition that if noise abatement measures between the Parkway and adjacent residences in this project must be taken to qualify the Kahului-Keauliou Parkway project for Federal funding, the residential owners would be required to pay for the noise abatement." The sales materials and covenants do not have to follow the exact wording of this condition but shall inform the prospective purchasers of the substance of this condition. N. Comply with Chapter 11-55, Water Pollution Control, Hawaii Administrative Rules, Department of Health, which requires an NPDES permit for certain construction activity. O. During construction, measures shall be taken to minimize the potential of both 7 fugitive dust and runoff sedimentation. Such measures shall be in compliance With construction industry standards and practices utilized during construction projects of the State of Hawaii I P. Earthwork and grading wall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sediment Control of the Hawaii County Code. I Q. A Data Recovery Plan for the two sites recommended for preservation (Sites 24842 and 24534) shall be submitted to the DLNR-HPD for review and approval. A landscaped buffer shall be constructed around the sites. i f R. A Burial Treatment Plan for Site 24842 shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Planning Director in consultation with the DLNR-HPD and flawai`i Island Burial Council. The proposed mitigation treatment for the burial site shall be approved by the Hawaii Island Burial Council before detailed mitigation plans are finalized. A copy of the approved Burial Treatment Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the issuance of any land alteration permits. S. Should any undiscovered remains of historic sites, such as rock walls, terraces, platforms, marine shell concentrations or human burials be encountered, work in I the immediate area shall cease and the Department of Land and Natural Resources-Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-HPD) shall be immediately notified. Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearame from the DLNR-HPD when it finds that sufficient mitigation measures have. been taken. i T. To ensure that the Goals and Policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan are implemented, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Chapter I l; Article 1, Hawaii County Code relating to Affordable Housing Policy. Prior to ifinal subdivision approval, applicant shall have entered into an agreement with the county in a form approved by the Administrator of the Office of Housing and ` Community Development for satisfaction of its requirement under Chapter i i and shall have provided security to the county, which security shall be in a form that is i acceptable to the county in its sole discretion, for full satisfaction of its affordable housing requirement. U The applicant shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution shall be initially based on the representations contained within the change of zone application and may be increased or reduced proportionally if the lot counts are adjusted. The fair share contribution shall become due and payable prior to receipt of Final Subdivision Approval or within five years from the effective date of this amended change of zone ordinance, whichever occurs first. The fair share contribution for each lot shall be based on a maximum density for each lot as determined by the zoning resulting from this change of zone. The fair share 8 fi I I contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective i date of the amendment to the ordinance, based on the percentage change in the i Honolulu Consumer Price Index (HOPI). The fair share contribution shall have a maximum combined value of$11,506.13 per single-family residential unit. The i total amount shall be determined with the actual number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in this condition. The fair share contribution per single-family residential unit shall be allocated as follows: • $5,548.46 per single-family residential unit to the County to support park and recreational improvements and facilities; • $267.66 per single-family residential unit to the County to support police facilities; • $528.66 per single-family residential unit to the County to support fire facilities; • $231.45 per single-family residential unit to the County to support solid waste facilities; • $4,929.90 per single-family residential unit to the County to support road and traffic improvements; In lieu of paying the fair share contribution, the applicant may contribute land i and/or construct improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation. fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities and road's' within the region impacted by the h proposed development, subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning Director, upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the i County Council. The applicant shall receive a credit against the fair share contribution required for road and traffic improvements outside of the proposed subdivision in the amount of the costs of construction as described in Condition H herein. V. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. W. The applicant shall comply with all applicable County, State and Federal laws, rules, regulations and requirements. X. An annual progress report shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the effective date of the ordinance. The report shall include, but not be limited to, the status of the development and compliance with the conditions of approval. This condition shall remain in effect until all of the conditions of approval have been satisfied and the Planning Director acknowledges that further reports are not required. E 9 r Y. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within this ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns. and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. 2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. 3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of the change of zone. i 4. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Planning Director may initiate rezoning of the property to its original or more appropriate designation. f I SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other parts of this ordinar+ce. 1 SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. ! INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAII Kona , Hawai`i Dake of Introduction: January 7 , 2009 Date of 1st Reading: January 7, 2009 Date of 2nd Reading: January 23, 2009 Effective Date: February 9, 2009 REFERENCIA Cornet; 62.12 10 • � , =� := ,11,E � �! sAm 'r, ��.r.��ry' �. it/I�11 ■ � - 1� AGRICULTURAL 5 ACRES(A.5a) TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL t r r , I 7,500 SQUAR FEET RS- 11.05 • - - . OR • • • • . • • - r • , / A A A - A A A A A . • - • A A A 11: I � � 1• �• 11 I f 2 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK Dat- ___l—� 011 - County of Hawaii minty counciil Kona, Hawaii f (Draft 2) Introduced By: Donald Ikeda ROLL CALL VOTE Date Introduced: January 7, 2009 AYES NOES ABS EX First Beading: January 7, 2009 Enriques X Published: January 16, 2009 Ford X Greenwell X REMARKS: Hoffmann X Ikeda X Naeole X Onishi X Yagong X Yoshimoto X Second Reading: January 23 , 2009 5 3 1 0 i To Mayor: February 2, 2009 (Draft 3) Returned: February 9 , 2009 ROLL CALL VOTE E Effective: February 9, 2009 AYES NOES ABS EX !` Published: February -19, 2009 Enriques X Ford X REMARKS: Greenwell X Hoffmann X Ikeda X Naeole X Onishi X Yagong X Yoshimoto X 8 1 0 0 I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that theforegoing BILL was adopted by the County Council published as indicated above. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGA ITY: COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON DEPUT C RPORATION CO NSEL < -0 0.000000 COT O HAWA`I ' 417-D J 3 C p 1 COUNTY CLERK Date2OnU 322 (Draft 3) (2006-2008) Bill No.: Approvr ' a proved this ,�day Reference: C-62 . 12/PC-2 Ord No.: 09 8 >=— zoo i MA YOR, COUNTY OF HA WAI'I E •@1••4•�A w0�•P�, 4rff o�•�Paa 1161 PLANNING COMMISSION Aupuni Center a 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 + Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)961-8288 . Fax(808)961-8742 Tune 30 , 2008 Steven S. C. Lim,Esq. Carlsmith Ball LLP 121 Waianuenue Avenue Hilo,HI 96720 Dear Mr. Lim: Special Management Area Use Permit Application (SMA 07-000024) Request: To Allow a 65-Lot Single Family Residential Subdivision Applicant: Kona Heights, LLC Tax Map Key_. 7-7-8:121 The Planning Commission at its duly held public hearing on June 20, 2008, voted to approve the above-referenced request for a Special Management Area (SMA) Use Permit to allow the development of a 65-lot single family residential subdivision and related improvements. The property is located at the south end of Naniloa Street and adjacent to the White Sands Beach Estates and Keauhou View Estates Subdivisions, Kapalaalaea, North Kona, Hawaii. Approval of this request is based on the following: The purpose of Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), and Special Management Area Rules and Regulations of the County of Hawaii, is to preserve,protect, and where possible, to restore the natural resources of the coastal zone areas. Therefore, special controls on development within an area along the shoreline are necessary to avoid permanent loss of valuable resources and the foreclosure of management options. The proposed development, with the proposed conditions, will not have any significant adverse environmental or ecological. effect. The applicant proposes to develop a 65-lot single-family residential subdivision and related improvements. The anticipated product type is that of clustered single-family homes with smaller scale lots approximately 4,500 square feet in size. These small lots will be created through a Planned Unit Development under the proposed RS-7.5 zoning. All structures will be one Haivai`i County is ata Equal Opportunity Provides-acid Employer EXHIBIT B 20� g Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. Page 2 to two stories in height, and affordable housing requirements will be met with on lands owned by the applicant mauka of the site. Two archaeological sites and buffers will be preserved. The applicant requests a concurrent State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban and a Change of Zone from A-5a to RS-7.5 to allow the subdivision. The proposed action will not create significant adverse impacts upon nearby and immediately adjacent propefties. The project site is approximately 11.054-acres in size and located approximately I 1 miles south of the Kona International Airport at Keahole and four miles south of Kailua-Kona. The property is overgrown with vegetation, currently vacant and located outside of the Kahaluu Historic District. The White Sands Beach Estates and Keauhou View Estates are zoned RS-7.5 and located adjacent to the north of the project site. Lands to the west(makai) of the property are zoned A-5a. The Kahului- Keauhou Parkway (Alii Highway)borders the property to the east (mauka). Lands south of the project site are zoned RS-7.5 and RM-3.5. While the proposed development will not have a direct impact upon coastal recreational resources, review of developments within the Special Management Area must also consider the cumulative impacts of such developments upon these resources. With the proposed conditions,the development will not substantially affect scenic vistas or viewplanes of nearby residents nor have a significant adverse impact on coastal recreational or visual resources to the shoreline and coastal ecosystems. According to the applicant,the development may result in some compromise to views from adjacent developments, but due to the slope of the project site, no significant impacts are anticipated. White Sands Beach Estates and Keauhou View Estates subdivisions' property owners to the north and Alii Heights property owners to the north east, have relatively unobstructed views south across the site and the undeveloped KIC property. Air quality in the area is predominantly affected by emissions from natural and vehicular sources. Both short-term air and noise quality impacts associated with the construction of the proposed improvements are expected during construction,especially during grubbing and grading activities. These impacts can be mitigated through the utilization of best management practices. Given the limited nature of the improvements, no significant long-term air and noise duality impacts are anticipated. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives and policies as provided by Chapter 205A, HRS, and Special Management Area guidelines contained in Rule No. 9 of the Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure. County water is available to the project site from an existing 6-inch waterline within Queen Kalama Avenue, approximately 150 feet from the parcel. According to the applicant, the project is Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. Page 3 registered with the U.S. Green Building Council as a LEED project and has indicated that LEED design criteria require lower water demands than County requirements. As such, the DWS requests that the applicant submit data and calculations prepared by a registered professional engineer to support the LEED design criteria. The project will connect to the County wastewater system. Any impacts from soil erosion and runoff during site preparation and construction phases can be adequately mitigated through compliance with existing regulations and proper construction practices. Air emissions generated during the construction phase for the proposed project can be mitigated by existing construction regulations. With these precautionary measures in place, the proposed development is not anticipated to have any substantial adverse effects upon nearby coastal resources or the surrounding environment. Conditions of approval will be included to ensure that impacts on coastal resources are minimized. A survey titled Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMMC., 7-7-08: 121, Land of Kapalaalaea 2, North Kana District, Island of Hawaii was prepared by Haun and Associates in January,2006 (Appendix B). The archaeological inventory survey identified 14 sites assessed as significant for their information content. Nine sites were recommended for mitigation through data recovery, and two sites were recommended for preservation. The plans for data recovery will be detailed in a Data Recovery Plan prepared for DLNR-SHPD review and approval. Specific plans for preservation and maintenance of a burial feature will be detailed in a Burial Treatment Plan prepared for DLNR-SHPD and the Hawaii Island Burial Council's review and approval. The project will not impact the preservation sites. A protective buffer (fence) will be established around the sites. A study titled Cultural Impact Study/Assessment, Laipala Heights, Kapalaalaea Ahupuaa, District of North Kona, Hawaii Island was prepared by Kaimipono Consulting Services LLC in December, 2006 (Appendix Q. The study concluded that "while evidence of ancient or traditional cultural practices still exists on the project lands, there does not appear to be any evidence of any ongoing traditional cultural practices, except perhaps fishing, which,while not directly impacted by the project, may indirectly impact this resource." Vegetation at the site is characterized by koa haole scrub land. A Survey of Botanical, Avian and Terrestrial mammalian Species for the proposed Laipala Heights Subdivision, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii prepared by Rana Productions in 2006 identified 36 plant species of which two were indigenous. No hoary bats were detected during the field survey. The avian survey identified 224 birds of fourteen different non-native species. There were no species of flora or fauna currently listed as endangered, threatened or proposed for listing under either the State or Federal endangered species programs i b t Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. Page 4 The property is located in Zone "X", an area outside of the 500-year flood plain. The DPW recommends that a drainage study be prepared to include a flood study to determine whether the property may be inundated by the design discharge from the proposed culverts crossing Kahului to Keauhou Parkway. A condition will be included to require the applicant to comply with Chapter 27,Flood Control for the development of the project site. According to the applicant, there is no evidence of any traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the site or nearby area, nor existence of any known valued cultural, hist©rical or native resources. The proposed development is consistent with the County General Plan and the Zoning Code. The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the County. The subject area is designated Low Density Urban. The property is zoned Agricultural (A-5a). The applicant is requesting a concurrent change of zone from A-5a to RS-7.5 to allow the development of the 65-lot subdivision.. Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the LUPAG Map designation and the Zoning Code. Access to the project site will be from Alii Drive via the extension of the Naniloa Street stub-out at Queen Kalama Avenue. Naniloa Street has a 20 ft. wide pavement within a 50-ft right-of-way. Queen Kalama Avenue has a 20 ft. wide pavement within a 50-ft. right-of-way. Access from Alii Drive is available from Laatoa Avenue which has a 20 ft. wide pavement within a 60-ft right-of-way. No vehicular access easements are provided from the future Kahului to Keauhou Parkway. The project proposes to connect with the future Kamehameha Investment Corporation's development (TMK: 7-8-10: 2) south of the project site, as well as connections to Alii Drive through the currently vacant parcel (TMK 7-7-8:001) makai and adjacent to the project site. Discussions have been initiated with the adjacent makai landowner. The Department of Public Works (DPW) requires.roadway connections to adjoining parcels and states that vehicular access to individual lots shall be prohibited from Kahului to Keauhou Parkway. However, a gated vehicular emergency egress to Kahului to Keauhou Parkway may be installed. The DPW further requires improvements at the Queen Kalama Avenue - Alii Drive intersection including any necessary pavement widening, the construction of a dedicated southbound left turn lane on Alii Drive and provision of concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk on one side of the street with appropriate drywells for drainage control from the proposed development to Alii Drive. In view of the Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" and "Ka Pa'akai O Ka'Aina" decisions, the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights .must be addressed. These rights crust be addressed in terms of the cultural, historical, and natural resources and the associated traditional and customary practices of the site. Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. Page S Investigation of valued resources: The applicant has submitted the following studies from which the Planning Commission can determine the valued natural, cultural and historical resources in the project area. a A Survey of Botanical, Avian and Terrestrial mammalian Species far the proposed Laipala Heights Subdivision, North Korea District, Island of Hawaii prepared by Rana Productions in 2006 a Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK: 7-7-08: 121, Land of Kapalaalaea 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii prepared by Haun and Associates in January, 2006 a Cultural Impact Study/Assessment, Laipala Heights, Kapalaalaea Ahupuaa, District of North Kona, Hawaii Island prepared by Kaimipono Consulting Services LLC in December, 2006 The valuable cultural historical and natural resources found in the area: Both the floral/fauna and archaeological studies revealed no endangered species or historical sites on the project site. However, a condition will be included to require the applicant to cease work and notify the DLNR-HPD should any remains be discovered on the site,.until given clearance to proceed by the DLNR-HPD. The submittal of a Data Recovery Plan and a Burial Treatment Plan will be required as a condition of approval for the two sites in the project area. Possible„adverse effects or impairment of valued resources: Native vegetation may be destroyed by ground alteration. There is no evidence that the flora in the area are particularly desired or used for cultural practices. According to the botanical and archaeological studies submitted by the applicant, the project will not adversely impact resources in the area. Feasible actions to protect native Hawaiian rights: The applicant has stated that there is no evidence of any traditional or customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the project site, nor existence of any known valued cultural, historical or native resources in the area. Thus, it is believed that the project would have no adverse impact relative to the cultural and historical resources of the area. To the extent to which traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights are exercised, the proposed action will not affect traditional Hawaiian rights. Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. Page 6 Based on the above findings, it is determined that the proposed development and related improvements will not have any substantial adverse impacts on the surrounding area, nor will its approval be contrary to the objectives and policies of Chapter 205A, HRS, relating to Coastal Zone Management and Rule No. 9 of the Planning Commission relating to the Special Management Area. Approval of this request is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant, its successor or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all stated conditions of approval of this permit. 2. The effective date of this Special Management Area Use Permit shall be the effective date of the Change-of Zone for this project (REZ 07-000075). 3. Prior to the issuance of a water commitment by the Department of Water Supply, the applicant shall submit the anticipated maximum daily water usage calculations as recommended by a registered engineer and a water commitment deposit in accordance with the "Water Commitment Guidelines Policy"to the Department of Water Supply within 180 days from the effective date of this permit. 4. Final Subdivision approval shall be secured within five(5) years from the effective date of this permit. 5. Access shall meet with the approval of the Department of Public Works and conform to Chapter 22 (Streets) of the Hawaii County Code. 6. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties. 7. During construction,measures shall be taken to minimize the potential of both fugitive dust and runoff sedimentation. Such measures shall be in compliance with construction industry standards and practices utilized during construction projects in the State of Hawaii. 8. All earthwork and grading shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sediment Control of the Hawaii County Code. 9. The project shall connect to the County sewerline. 10. Comply with Chapter 11-55, Water Pollution Control, Hawaii Administrative Rules, Department of Health, which requires a NPDES permit for certain construction activity. _ J Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. Page 7 11, A Data Recovery Plan for the two sites recommended for preservation (Sites 24842 and 24534) shall be submitted to the DLNR-HPD for review and approval. A landscaped buffer shall be constructed around the sites. 12. A Burial Treatment Plan for Site 24842 shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Planning Director in consultation with the DLNR-HPD and Hawaii Island Burial Council. The proposed mitigation treatment for the burial site shall be approved by the Hawaii Island Burial Council before detailed mitigation plans are finalized. A copy of the approved Burial Treatment Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the issuance of any land alteration permits. 13. Should any undiscovered remains of historic sites, such as rock walls, terraces, platforms, marine shell concentrations or human burials be encountered, work in the immediate area shall cease and the Department of Land and Natural Resources-Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-HPD) shall be immediately notified. Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearance from the DLNR-HPD when it finds that sufficient mitigation measures have been taken. 14. The applicant shall comply with all applicable County, State and Federal laws, rules, regulations and requirements. 15. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within this permit may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: A. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. B. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. C. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of this permit. D. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). 1 E. If the applicant should require an additional extension of time, the Planning Department shall submit the applicant's request to the Planning Commission for appropriate action. Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. Page 8 Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Planning Director may initiate procedures to revolve the permit. This approval does not, however, sanction the specific plans submitted with the application as they may be subject to change given specific code and regulatory requirements of the affected agencies. Should you have any questions, please contact Norman Hayashi of the Planning Department at 961-8288. Sincerely, Rodney Watanabe, Chairman Planning Commission Lkonaheightssma07-000024PC cc: Department of Public Works Department of Water Supply County Real Property Tax Division Planning Department - Kona Department of Land and Natural Resources/HPD DOT-Highways, Honolulu Ms, Alice Kawaha Zoning inspector - Kona Subdivision Section 4 E 3 f TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC (formerly Kona Heights LLC) are the current owners of a property identified by TMK: 7-7-008; 121. As landowner and applicant, I hereby authorize Daryn Arai Land Use Planning Consultant to submit and process a time extension and other related amendments to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09 8 (REZ 07-000075) and Special Management Area Use Permit (SMA 07-000024). (Signature) (Date) Ernest Mansi, Managing Member HAWAII ONE1 INVESTORS LLC 300 E ESPLANDE DR., STE 1550 OXNARD, CA 93036-1281 EXHIBIT C RKonaHei ghrs REZ-05116108 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION KONA HEIGHTS, LLC CHANGE OF TONE APPLICATION(REZ 07-000075) Upon review of the request for a Change of Zone from Agricultural 5-acres(A-5a)to Single-Family Residential 7,500 square feet(RS-7.5) on approximately 11.054 acres of land against the guidelines for granting a change of zone, the Planning Director recommends that a favorable recommendation for a Change of Zone request be forwarded to the County Council. This recommendation does not,however, sanction the specific plans submitted with the application as they may be subject to change given the specific code and regulatory requirements of the affected agencies. Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public testimony, the Director reserves the right to modify and/or alter this recommendation based upon additional information presented at the public hearing. This favorable recommendation is based on the following findings: The applicant requests a Change of Zone from Agricultural 5-acre (A-5a) to Single-Family Residential 7,500 square feet(RS-7.5)to develop a 65-lot single-family residential subdivision and related improvements on approximately 11.054 acres of land. The anticipated product type is that of clustered single-family homes with smaller scale lots approximately 4,500 square feet in size. These small lots will be created through a Planned Unit Development under the proposed RS-7.5 zoning. • All structures will be one to two stories in height. • Affordable housing requirements will be met with on lands owned by the applicant mauka of the site. Two archaeological sites and buffers will be preserved. The applicant is requesting a concurrent processing of a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban, and a Special Management Area Use Permit to allow the proposed project. In order to consider an area for any type of zoning designation,the applicable goals,policies and standards of the General Plan must be adequately addressed. It is only -1- EXHIBIT D through such a comprehensive policy analysis approach that evaluations and decisions can be made to better time and stage developments to achieve growth determined by the • General Plan and related planning documents. The implications of these evaluations and decisions must be also considered as they may have an impact on similar areas in the County. The Change of Zone request from Agricultural(A-5a) to a Single Family Residential(RS-7.5)zoned district will conform to, among others, the Land Use (Single Family Residential) and Housing elements of the General Plan. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide(LUPAG)Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban and non- urban form for areas within the County. The subject area is designated Low Density Urban. The Low Density Urban designation allows "Residential, with ancillary community and public uses, and neighborhood and convenience-type commercial uses." Thus,the proposed residential development would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation. The applicant intends to apply for a Planned Unit Development{PUD}permit after receipt of the accompanying change of zone application and approval of this permit. The Planned Unit Development is intended to encourage comprehensive site planning that adapts the design of the development to the land,by allowing diversification in the relationships of various uses,buildings, structures, open spaces and yards,building heights, and lot sizes in planned building groups, while still insuring that the intent of the Zoning Code is observed. The proposed single family residential development will add to the variety of housing inventory for the district of North Kona, and provide housing in areas that are appropriately located and serviced. Thus, the provision of this type of planned unit development housing development will implement the General Plan's Housing and Land Use Elements. The proposed development will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and result in an intensity of land utilization no higher than as -2- permitted or as otherwise specified for the district in which this proposed development occurs. The White Sands Beach Estates and Keauhou View Estates are zoned RS-7.5 and located adjacent to the north of the project site. Lands to the west (makai)of the property are zoned A-5a. The Kahului -Keauhou Parkway(formerly known as Alii Highway) borders the property to the east(mauka). Lands south of the project site are zoned RS-7.5 and RM-3.5. Therefore, a favorable recommendation of this change of zone request will be consistent with the emerging land use pattern being established within this portion of North Kona. The property is currently not used for any agricultural activities. The Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)designates the property as Zone"X", an area determined to be outside of the 500-year flood plain. The property slopes in a westerly(makai) direction, and elevation varies from approximately 130 feet above mean sea level (MSL) at the eastern boundary to approximately 64 feet MSL along the western boundary. The property is unclassified by the Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH) System. Soils within the property and surrounding area are classified as"E"or"Very Poor" For agricultural productivity by the Land Study Bureau. While the potential for intensive and/or extensive agricultural uses may exist,the soil conditions within the property and surrounding area would preclude such intensive agricultural activities from being conducted. Access to the project site will be from Alii Drive via the extension of the Naniloa Street stub-out at Queen Kalama Avenue. Naniloa Street has a 20 ft. wide pavement within a 50-ft right-of-way. Queen Kalama Avenue has a 20 ft. wide pavement within a 50-ft. right-of-way. Access from Alii Drive is also available from Laaloa Avenue which has a 20 ft. wide pavement within a 60-ft right-of-way. No vehicular access easements are provided from the future Kahului - Keauhou Parkway. The project proposes to connect with the future Kamehameha Investment Corporation's development (TMK: 7-8- 10: 2) south of the project site, as well as connections to Alii Drive through the currently vacant parcel (TMK 7-7-8:001) makai and adjacent to the project site. Discussions have been initiated with the adjacent makai landowner. The Department of Public Works (DPW)requires roadway connections to adjoining parcels and states that vehicular access -3- to individual lots shall be prohibited from Kahului -Keauhou Parkway. However, a gated vehicular emergency egress to Kahului-Keauhou Parkway may be installed. On June 25, 2007, Ordinance No. 07-99, establishing"concurrency" standards for roads and water, in rezonings,took effect. This is Section 25-2-46 of the Zoning Code. This is the first rezoning application in West Hawaii of a sufficient scale to trigger a "concurrency" analysis. Under Ordinance No. 07-99, any rezoning proposing a development that will generate 50 or more trips at the AM or PM peak hour needs to prepare a traffic impact analysis report(`TIAR"} that analyzes the project's effects on local and regional traffic. This project barely exceeds the 50 trip minimum threshold for a TIAR. The Planning Department required a revised TZAR for this project because the TZAR initially submitted did not address regional traffic impacts. Concurrency requirements for roads are based upon the level of service("LOS") of roadways serving the area. If the LOS is"E"or"F", or is projected to become so within five years, the developer,to obtain rezoning,must do something to mitigate the traffic, or wait until improvements have been funded, in order to get occupancy of the development. Ordinance No. 07-99 also has an affordable housing alternative: that the development provide twice the required affordable housing,because having housing closer to job centers reduces commuting and thus helps solve the traffic problem. For this development, although Alii Drive is currently at LOS "C", and is projected to be at LOS "D"in five years,with or without the development, Kuakini Highway is at LOS "E"currently, and is expected to be at LOS "E"in five years,with or without the project. The TIAR does not assume that any major roads will be completed within five years, although it does assume that there will be a left turn on Alii Drive into Laaloa Ave. It is interesting that the TIAR concludes that in 2016, even with the assumed completion of the Mamalahoa Bypass(Keauhou to Napopoo), the Kahului- Keauhou Parkway Phase I (Keauhou to Lako St.) and the La'aloa Ave. extension to Kuakini,that Kuakini will still be at LOS"E"because of the expected overall increase in traffic. Because Kuakini is at LOS "E",the developer must do mitigation, or wait until the completion of a major road improvement, like the Kahalui-Keauhou Parkway, or build additional affordable housing. -4- Mitigation should be commensurate with the impact of the project. In this case, the projected traffic is small: the TIAR expects that during the period when all traffic uses Alii Drive, it would only increase traffic on Alii Drive by about 5%. The concurrency ordinance also provides that the Planning Director shall give options to the council on how concurrency can be achieved. In this situation,there are several possible alternatives: Alternative 1: The draft Kona Community Development Plan proposes a connector road in the vicinity of this property,that would provide a mauka-makai connection between Alii Drive and the Kahalui-Keauhou Parkway. The alignment of the connector is conceptual in the draft CDP, and is shown on the boundary between this property and the KIC property to the south. See Exhibit 18. The eventual connection to the Parkway would be on KIC property. The Parkway plans originally had an intersection at Makolea St., about .b miles to the south, but this had to be eliminated because of the burial issue near this intersection. The result is that unless there is another connection as shown in the CDP,there would be no connection between Alii Drive and the Kahului - Keauhou Parkway between the Keauhou Shopping Center and La'aloa Ave., a distance of about 1.8 miles. The conditions of zoning would allow this to be built as a minor or local street,rather than as a collector,because it would be just one of a network of streets eventually providing access between Alii Drive and the Kahului- Keauhou Parkway. The difficulty for the applicant with Alternative I is that it cannot connect to Alii Drive without access through property it does not currently own. Alternative 2: the applicant could provide improvements to Alii Drive, specifically, a left turn lane at the Queen KalamalAlii Drive intersection. Alternative 3: the applicant could provide twice the affordable housing normally required under Chap. 11. In this case,the applicant would still be required to make some improvements to the Queen KalamalAlii Drive intersection because of safety and traffic flow issues. Alternative 4: the applicant could wait for occupancy until funds have been committed for Phase I of the Kahului -Keauhou Parkway. Although Kuakini might still be at LOS "E", the TIAR projects traffic on the Kahului - Keauhou Parkway to be at LOS "D"in 2015, hence adequate under the concurrency standards. In this case, the applicant -5- would still be required to make some improvements to the Queen Kalama/Alii Drive intersection because of safety and traffic flow issues. The proposed conditions of zoning are written so that the applicant has the option of Alternative 1 or 2. If Alternative 1 is chosen,the applicant would not be expected to make any improvements to the Queen Kalama/Alii Drive intersection,because most of the project traffic would be expected to use the new alternative road. If Alternative 2 is chosen, the applicant would still have to build a road within the project that could be a portion of a mauka-makai connector road,but would not build the portion between their property and Alii Drive. Alternatives 3 and 4 have not been incorporated into the proposed conditions of zoning because it creates such a complex ordinance, but if the applicant wishes, the ordinance could be written to include these alternatives. County water is available to the project site from an existing 6-inch waterline within Queen Kalama Avenue, approximately 150 feet from the parcel. According to the applicant,the project is registered with the U.S. Green Building Council as a LEED project and has indicated that LEED design criteria require lower water demands than County requirements. As such,the DWS requests that the applicant submit data and calculations prepared by a registered professional engineer to support the LEED design criteria. The project will connect to the county wastewater system. All essential utilities are available to the site. The subject request is not contrary to Chapter 205A,Hawaii Revised Statutes, relating to Coastal Zone Management Area. The property is situated within the Special Management Area, mauka of Alii Drive. The site is approximately 800 feet from the coastline and therefore, will not be impacted by coastal hazard and beach erosion. There are no identified recreational resources,public access to the shoreline or mountain areas, scenic and open space preserves, coastal ecosystems,marine resources or other natural and environmental resources in the project area. Thus,the proposed request and use of the property will not adversely impact those resources. The property is overgrown with vegetation,currently vacant and located outside of the Kahaluu Historic District. The White Sands Beach Estates and Keauhou View Estates are zoned RS-7.5 and located adjacent to the north of the project site. Lands to the west(makai) of the -6- property are zoned A-5a. The Kahului - Keauhou Parkway(Alii Highway)borders the property to the east(mauka). Lands south of the project site are zoned RS-7.5 and RM- 3.5. A survey titled Archaeological Inventory Survey, TALK: 7-7-08: 121, Land of Kapalaalaea 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii was prepared by Haun and Associates in January, 2405 (Appendix B). The archaeological inventory survey identified 14 sites assessed as significant for their information content. Nine sites were recommended for mitigation through data recovery, and two sites were recommended for preservation. The plans for data recovery will be detailed in a Data Recovery Plan prepared for DLNR-SHPD review and approval. Specific plans for preservation and maintenance of a burial feature will be detailed in a Burial Treatment Plan prepared for DLNR-SHPD and the Hawaii Island Burial Council's review and approval. The project will not impact the preservation sites. A protective buffer(fence)will he established around the sites. A study titled Cultural Impact StiadylAssessment, Laipala Heights, Kapalaalaea Ahupuaa, District of North Dona, Hawaii Island was prepared by Kaimipono Consulting Services LLC in December, 2005 (Appendix Q. The study concluded that`while evidence of ancient or traditional cultural practices still exists on the project lands, there does not appear to be any evidence of any ongoing traditional cultural practices, except perhaps fishing,which,while not directly impacted by the project, may indirectly impact this resource." Vegetation at the site is characterized by koa haole scrub land. A Survey of Botanical, Avian and Terrestrial mammalian Species for the proposed Laipala Heights Subdivision, North Konya District, Island of Hawaii prepared by Rana Productions in 2045 identified 35 plant species of which two were indigenous. No hoary bats were detected during the field survey. The avian survey identified 224 birds of fourteen different non-native species. There were no species of flora or fauna currently listed as endangered,threatened or proposed for listing under either the State or Federal endangered species programs. In view of the Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" and "Kra Pa'akai Q Kao Aina"decisions,the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights must be addressed. These rights must be addressed in terms of the cultural,historical, -7- and natural resources and the associated traditional and customary practices of the site. Investigation of valued resources: The applicant has submitted the following studies from which the Planning Commission can determine the valued natural, cultural and historical resources in the project area. ■ A Survey of Botanical, Avian and Terrestrial mammalian Species for the proposed Laipala Heights Subdivision, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii prepared by Rana Productions in 2005 0 Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK: 7-7-08: 121, Land of Kapalaalaea 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii prepared by Haun and Associates in January, 2005 ■ Cultural Impact StudylAssessment, Laipala Heights, Kapalaalaea Ahupuaa, District of North Kona, Hawaii Island prepared by Kairnipono Consulting Services LLC in December,2005 The valuable cultural historical and natural resources found in the area: Both the floral/fauna and archaeological studies revealed no endangered species or historical sites on the project site. However, a condition will be included to require the applicant to cease work and notify the DLNR-HPD should any remains be discovered on the site, until given clearance to proceed by the DLNR-HPD. The submittal of a Data Recovery Plan and a Burial Treatment Plan will be required as a condition of approval for the two sites in the project area. Possible adverse effects or impairment of valued resources: Native vegetation may be destroyed by ground alteration. There is no evidence that the flora in the area are particularly desired or used for cultural practices. According to the botanical and archaeological studies submitted by the applicant, the project will not adversely impact resources in the area. Feasible actions to protect native Hawaiian fights: The applicant has stated that there is no evidence of any traditional or customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the project site,nor existence of any known valued cultural,historical or native resources in the area. Thus, it is believed that the project would have no adverse impact relative to the cultural and historical resources of the area. To the extent to which -8- traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights are exercised,the proposed action will not affect traditional Hawaiian rights. Based on the above findings,the approval of the Change of Zone request from an Agricultural (A-59) to a Residential(RS-7.5)zoned district would result in an appropriate land use pattern that will further benefit the public. The accompanying draft bill to amend Section 25-8-3 (North Kona Zone Map)of Chapter 25, Zoning Code, of the Hawaii County Code, is provided for your favorable consideration to the County Council. Please note the proposed conditions of approval attached to the draft bill. -9- CARLSMITH BALL LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE 201`1 ^�a l` 3" 11 1: 14 P.O.Box 686 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAx 808.935.7975 W W W.CARLSMITH.COM SLIM©CARLSMITH.COM January 30, 2014 HAND DELIVERED Duane Kanuha Director Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attn: Daryn Arai Re: Administrative Time Extension Request Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09-08, Condition E (REZ 07-000075) Special Management Area Use Permit No. 07-000024, Condition 4 Development: Laipala Makai Applicant: Kona Heights, LLC Successor Applicant: Hawaii Onel Investors, LLC TMK No. (3) 7-7-008:121 (the "Property") Dear Mr. Kanuha: Our client, Hawaii One 1 Investors, LLC ("Hawaii One"), is the successor applicant under Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09-08 ("Ord. No. 09-08") and Special Management Area Use Permit No. 07-000024 ("SMA 07-24"). The original applicant, Kona Heights, LLC, relinquished the Property through final foreclosure proceedings on August 29, 2012. Hawaii One acquired the Property from the lender's nominee on August 1, 2013. Ord. No. 09-08, effective February 9, 2009, reclassified the Property from Agricultural-5 acres (A-5a) to Single Family Residential-7,500 sq.ft. (RS-7.5). SMA 07-24, also effective February 9, 2009, allowed the development of a 65-lot single family residential subdivision and related improvements. Ord. No. 09-08, Condition E states: "Final Subdivision Approval for the first subdivision phase shall be secured within five (5) years from the effective date of this ordinance. The first subdivision phase shall be defined as consisting of up to fifty (50) lots." HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUI GUAM LOS ANGELES 4843-7222-6326.2.066481-00001 EXHIBIT E 089716 S 97 1 6 January 30, 2014 Page 2 SMA 07-24, Condition 4 states: "Final Subdivision Approval shall be secured within five (5) years from the effective date of this permit." Based on the foregoing conditions, the deadline for Final Subdivision Approval for the first phase subdivision consisting of 50 lots is February 9, 2014. Since acquiring the Property late last year, Hawaii One took immediate steps to develop a plan to address the various entitlement conditions imposed on the development. As you are aware, Hawaii One met with your office and the Department of Parks and Recreation recently to discuss options to address the onerous off-site park requirement under Ord. No. 09-08, Condition C. Hawaii One is currently evaluating the options to satisfy the off-site park requirements and has engaged a local architectural design firm to develop park options for presentation to the County. Hawaii One's architect is also working on developing a new lotting plan for the development. Hawaii One is working with the adjacent land owner to the west (makai) of the Property to develop a mauka/makai spine road to connect the proposed development to AIN Drive. Hawaii One anticipates retaining a local engineering consultant to evaluate the roadway design and infrastructure requirements shortly. Since Hawaii One is still in a preliminary planning phase to implement the development, Hawaii One requires additional time to finalize plans for the development. For the reasons stated above, the non-performance with the subject conditions of approval were the result of conditions that the Hawaii One could not have foreseen and is not the result of their fault or negligence. As such, Hawaii One respectfully requests your approval of a five (5) year administrative time extension of Ord. No. 09-08, Condition E and SMA 07-24, from February 9, 2014 to February 9, 2019. If you have any questions or require any additional information on the subject request, please feel free to contact me or my paralegal Jason Knable at 808-935-6644 at any time. Thank you for your assistance with this matter. Sincerely, en S.C. Lim SSL/jkkl 4843-722-6326.2.066481-00001 wifliam R Kenoi '-�° �':° �.: �,t Duane ttanuha 'i'layor Director Dobby Command .' a ��e Deputy Director Voest Hawaii Once East Hawaii office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy101 Pauahi street,Suite 3 Kailua-Kon,Hawai'i 96740 Countyof aW61_1 ik Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(90 8)323-4770 Phone(808)961-8288 Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPART AMNT Fax(809)961-8742 RECD JUL 2 5 2014 July 24, 2014 Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. Carlsmith Ball, LLP P.O. Box 686 Hilo, HI 96721-0686 Dear Mr. Lim: Change of Zone Ordinance No. 0908 (}FEZ 07-000075) SMA Use Permit No. 07-000024 (SMA-07-000024) Successor Applicant: Hawaii Oncl Investors, LLC (formerly Kona Heights, LLC) Subject: Administrative Time Extension to Condition E of Ordinance No. 09-08 and Condition No. 4 of SMA 07-000024 TMK: 7-7-008:121 Thank you for your letter dated June 25, 2014 regarding the above-referenced matter. In response, we offer the following to your request for a five(5) year time initial administrative time extension pursuant to the above-cited change of zone ordinance and SNLk Use Permit that requires the completion of the proposed 65-lot single family residential subdivision. After considering the circumstances detailed within your letter, we are hereby issuing an administrative time extension unnTH Felbtrupa 9,2019 by which to complete the proposed subdivision as required by Condition E of Ordinance No. 09-08 and Condition No. 4 of SMA 07- 000024 Since the subject permit and ordinance permits me to grant art"initial" time extension for compliance with these referenced conditions, any additional time beyond February 9, 2019 will require submitting a time extension request to the Hawaii County Leeward Planning Commission for proper processing that entails a public meeting(s) and public notice requirements, as applicable. tww.coS P 4ann€nFdepi-eom 14aivai'r County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Er7ployer l�IW1 SE eo.hawl_i Mus EXHIBIT F Steven S. C. Lim, Esga Carlsmith Ball, LLP Page 2 July 24, 2014 We look forward to your next Annual Progress Report due on or before February 9, 2015, that includes a copy of the Department of Water Supply's official written approval, acceptance or waiver of the `submitted detailed water usage calculations as required by Condition B of Ordinance No. 09-08 and Condition No. 3 of SMA-07-000024. Should any matter in this letter need clarification or discussion, please contact Earl Lucero of guy staff at 961-8160. Sincerely, PUANE KANUHA Planning Director- EMUDSA;mad PAwpwin6MARU L.ettetN,�LREZ07-000075Hawane 15h i rn2.doc CC. Planning Department Dona YY es W iIliarn P.Kenai �;r Duane Kanuha Mayor Director Bobby Command Deputy Director West Hawaii Office East FIawai`i Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokatole Hwy ■ • 101 Pauahi Slreet Suite 3 Keilua-Kana,Hawaii 96740 County of Hawaii Hila,Hawaii 46720 Phone(808)323-4770 Phone(808)961-8288 Fax(809)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(908)961-8742 February 25, 2016 Michael J.Rielun, AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects P. O. Box 394747 Kailua-Kona,Iiawai`i 96739 Dear Mr. Riehm: SUBJECT- Application: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PL3D-15-000032) Applicant: RIEHM OWENSBY PLANNERS ARCHITECTS Agent: RIEHM OWENSBY PLANNERS ARCHITECTS Owner: HAWAII ONE1 INVESTORS,LLC Request: PUD: LA`IPALA MAKAI Tax May Key: 7-7-008:121 Upon review of the subject Planned Unit Development application and agency comments, the Planning Director, hereby, approves, in part, the request for a PUD-15-000032, to allow the development of a master-planned community consisting of 62-single family parcels on the subject property, This PUD approval outlines the EXCEPTIONS APPROVED AND EXCEPTIONS DENIED below in accordance with Chapter 25 (Toning) and Chapter 23 (Subdivisions) based upon the following background and findings. BACKGROUND APPLICANT'S REQUEST I. Request. The owners, Hawaii Onel Investors, LLC, are applying for a PUD to develop the subject property, TMK: 7-7-008:121, as a Planned Unit Development consisting of 62-single family residential lots. The applicant is requesting a PUD to allow for multiple exceptions from Chapter 25 (Zoning) and Chapter 23 (Subdivisions) in order to achieve the design principles for the subject development. These exceptions are to improve the overall quality, aesthetics, and to create a www.coliplanningdcpt.cn Hawaii County is an LqualOpportzindyProvtderand Employer nlanaiagrahawahawnri,;fov EXHIBIT G Michael J. Riehm, AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 2 February 25,2016 more pedestrian-oriented community that would not otherwise be possible with the current County of Hawaii Codes and Standard Details for :roadway construction. Approval of the requested exceptions would enable the applicant to create a neighborhood-friendly residential development with 62 lots designed with landscaped common open spaces primarily along the northern property boundary, a streetscape that is pedestrian-oriented and walkable, within a human-scaled neighborhood environment. Some of the characteristics that promote this feeling of a neighborhood-friendly community and create a sense of place are: • Human-scaled and pedestrian friendly with open space and landscaping ■ Compact and identifiable with boundaries that are recognizable + Use of CC&Rs to encourage housing design and energy efficiency Visually coherent—through setback of homes from the streets, use of front porches, architectural style,materials, and details that contribute to a coherent image + Strong degree of spatial hierarchy--open spaces in different sizes,shapes and physical treatments that allow for social interactions ■ Street corridors that are visually bounded, layered for an intimate feeling that enhance the quality of the streetscape—use of street trees, steps,and front porches + Street blocks can be understood as comprising their component neighborhoods —role of the street as a"social channel" for neighborly interaction ■ Promote social interaction among residents by providing a neighborhood friendly streetscape ■ Streetscape that is designed to be both pedestrian friendly and to accommodate traffic 2. Project Description. The property is situated within the District of North Kona, Hawaii approximately 4.5 miles south of Kailua-Kona town. It is east(mauka}of Alii Drive and west (makai) side of Kahului—Keauhou Parkway. The plan is to develop 62 residential lots,which will range in size from 3,082 sq.fr.to 6,501 sq.lit. The project is designed to address the needs and lifestyle of residents who want to live in a planned residential community that is a more compact community with alternate standards versus the current standard subdivision layout, which in many cases lacks a human scale and walkability. See Master Plan (Exhibit A). 3. Project Timeline.The applicant proposes to implement the development in a single phase in accordance with the following preliminary schedule,subject to permit approvals and economic conditions: Michael J. Riehm,AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 3 February 25,2016 A. Permit Appiovals: 1) PUD application submittal and approval,tentative subdivision submittal and approval, final subdivision submittal and approval, 6 months(March 2016 to September 2016). 2) Total site work complete with lots prepared for future house construction and projected sales to be 100% complete (62 lots and homes): 48 months (October 2016 to October 2020), 4. Time Extension.The applicant granted the Planning Director a time extension until March 17, 2016 to issue a decision on the application. EXCEPTIONS REQUESTED AND REASONS: HAWAII COUNTY CODE, CHAPTER 25,ZONING(See EXHIBIT B-Applicant's Exhibit 1-10) 5. Minimum Street Frontage. (Hawai`i County Code §25-4-30). The request is to allow the street frontage of a lot be less than the required 50% of building site average width for lots. With the project's use ofdrivecourts to create a"sense of place",the requirements of Section 25-4-30 become too restrictive for the Project's overall design goals. 6. Minimum Site Area; Minimum Average Width. (Hawai`i County Code §25-4-31). The request for reduced lot sizes below the minimum building site area or minimum average width area. The overall density as allowable by code would still be achieved by designing the project with less units than allowable. Lot sizes will range from approximately 3,082 sq. to 6,501 sq. The goal is to develop a workable amount of lots due to the amount of land area lost to the archaeological sites within the Project. Spatial characteristics of the neighborhood will be defined, with smaller lots, and defined by landscaped open spaces which provides for a visual feeling of a larger lot. The relief from the required minimum average width will help to achieve the Project's desired goal to create a human-scaled and pedestrian friendly community. 7. Redaction of Building Site below Minimum Area. (Hawai`i County Code §254-32). The request is for reduced lot sizes while remaining within the allowable density or intensity of land utilization.The reduction in lot size will accommodate design and still require the project to meet the required density as allowed by the current zoning. 8. General Requirements for Yards and Open Space. (HawaN County Code §25-4-40). The request is for alternate minimum yards and in lieu of the minimum required yards for a zoned district and to waive the requirement for labeling a front or rear yard, The project incorporates the use of landscaped open spaces and other unique street arrangements to provide a"sense of place" for the residents and to create spatial diversity. Through the use of reduced yard designations varying from 6'-S' (for sides)and from 8'-15' for(front and rear)an intimate and Michael J. Riehm,AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 4 February 25,2016 human-scaled environment with a `sense of place" is created. Applicant's Exhibits 1-9 delineate the reduced yard exceptions and relabeling of front and rear yard. 9. Corner Building Sites. (Hawai`i County Code §25.4-42). The request is to allow alternate minimum yard requirements in lieu of the requirement that for corner lots interior lines be side lot lines and all rear yard regulations be inapplicable.Through the use of reduced yard varying from 6' (for sides) and 6' (front and rear) designations an intimate and human scaled environment with a`sense of place" is created. The project incorporates the use of landscaped open spaces and other unique street arrangements to provide a"sense of place"for the residents and to create spatial diversity. 10. Fences and Accessory Structures. (Hawai`i County Code §25-4-43). This request is twofold. A. The request is to allow for retaining walls that exceed 6 feet in height when used to retain the grade be permitted to be on the boundary line and without any front, side, or rear yard requirements. Due to the prevalent slopes on the Island of Hawaii,retaining walls are often required at the property line to manipulate the grade to provide buildable lot pads. These retaining walls should be permitted at the property lines without any front, side or rear yard requirements in order to develop a more useable site area. B. This request is to allow any accessory structure, architectural feature, wall, fence, or any other free standing architectural feature over six feet in height to extend into any required front,side or rear yard. A variety of free standing architectural features may be used to create the desired character and ambiance of the neighborhood. These features may be in the form of walls, gates, arbors and trellises which in some cases may be over six feet in height. Flexibility in location of these items is critical to developing an intimate neighborhood character, The locations of these items will be pre-determined and the CCR's will control any abuse of this exception by the residents of the neighborhood. 11. Permitted Projections into Yards and Open Spaces.(Hawai`i County Code §25-4-44). The applicant requests that Section. 25-4-44(a)(1) for additional exceptions to features that may project into the required yard This exception would cover and allow for trellises, attached or detached to the house to exceed 6 feet in height, be permitted any distance into the required side yards. Michael J. Riehm,AIA Riehm Owenby Planners Architects Page 5 February 25,2016 12. Minimum Building Site Average Width. (Hawai`i County Code§25-5-6). The request is to reduce the minimum average width for the lots to achieve the spatial characteristics of the neighborhood,especially in defining the landscaped open spaces. The requirement of building site areas, building site average widths and yards is arbitrary in lieu of the Project's desired goal to create a human scaled and pedestrian friendly community. 13. Minimum Yards. (Hawai`i County Code§25-5-7) One of the design goals for the community is to develop an intimate and human scale environment that has a distinct"sense of place". In order to achieve this goal, control of the placement of the homes on the lots is mandatory. This request is to waive the minimum yards established in the RS district as established for this section. This would allow flexibility and variation in the side yard setbacks while still maintaining sufficient distance between the buildings. 14. Other Regulations. (Hawai`i County Code §25-5-5). The applicant requests that 25-5-8(d) which requires yard requirements based on area and average width,be waived. Flexibility in the dimensions and yards for the proposed lots will provide the spatial characteristics of the neighborhood,especially in defining the landscaped open spaces.This is need for the achieving the desired goal to create a human scaled and pedestrian friendly environment with a"sense of place". EXCEPTIONS REQUESTED AND REASONS: HAWAII COUNTY CODE, CHAPTER 23, SUBDIVISIONS (See EXHIBIT B- Applicant's Exhibit 11-30) 15. Block Sizes. (HCC §23-29). The petitioner is requesting that block sizes be less than 400 feet in length to encourage pedestrians to walk versus drive to a destination. Studies have shown that pedestrians will walk versus drive when a destination is within a five minute walking distance or 1,350 feet. Therefore,blocks less than 400 feet in length may encourage residents to walk to visit neighbors versus driving. 16. Lot Sizes, Shape, and Setback Line. (HCC §23-32). The request is that standards for lot size, width, shape, orientation and building setback lines to be different from the standards detailed in the Zoning Code. Lots are proposed to range in size from approximately 3,082 sq. ft. to 5,501 sq. ft, in varying shapes with reduced setback lines as depicted in EXHIBIT B- Applicant's Exhibit 1-9. 17. Access to Lot from Street. (HCC §23-34). The request is to allow exceptions to the requirement that access to lots to be from an approved public or approved private street. The project would instead provide accesses in reduced widths via designated drivecourts and access and utility easements, as labeled in the Exhibits. This would be in lieu of a public or private street,to provide both vehicular access and utility service to some of the lots. Michael J. Riehm,AIA Richet Owensby Planners Architects Page 6 February 25,2016 18. Lot Side Lines. (HCC §23-35). The request is to allow exceptions to the requirement that side lines of a lot shall run at right angles to the street or radial to the curve on a curved streets. The project is designed with side lines of the lots that front the curved interior roadway to be parallel to each other to create a sense of consistency with the placement of the homes versus the side lines running at right angles to the curved street. 19. Through Lots; Planting Screen Easement. (HCC §23-36). This section requires through lots shall be avoided to provide separation of development from major traffic arteries or adjacent non-residential activities or to overcome disadvantages of topography or orientation. Planting screen easements are also required. The applicant requests exception by providing a mew/open space where through lots occur. 20. Minimum Right-of-Way and Pavement Widths. (HCG §23-41). The request is to allow alternate street right of way and pavement width requirements as specified by code,in addition to increased pavements widths when sidewalks, curb, and gutter are required. The Project's internal roadway system will incorporate both County dedicable and private streets in order to make for a more neighborhood and pedestrian friendly environment. The applicant proposes to follow street section guidelines in the Kona Community Development Plan Village Guidelines as depicted in EXHIBIT B-Applicant's Exhibit 28-30. 21. Intersection Angles; Corner Radius. (HCG §23-45). The code sets minimum standards for street intersections to be a right angles and minimum corner radius of twenty-five feet. The request is that the minimum requirements for street intersections and corner radius be waived to provide safe pedestrian movement. Large turning radius at street intersections increase the walking distance from curb to curb, requiring the pedestrian to spend more time in the intersection. With this increased distance, the pedestrian must calculate, far in advance, an oncoming vehicle, to determine if they are able to safely cross the street. 22. Cul-de-sacs (HCC §23-48). Cul-de-sacs shall be as short as possible and not more than six hundred feet in length and serve no more than eighteen lots; in addition,have required turn- around. Exceptions to this requirement will provide for increased flexibility in developing a more creative master plan and pedestrian oriented environment than would be possible through the use of a typical subdivision layout and standards. The design of the street and cul-de-sacs is critical to achieving this goal and flexibility is required in the county standards. In the proposed project, where a cul-de-sac is provided, the street right-of-way is planned to be squarer in configuration and designated as a drivecourt. These size and shape of the drivecourt will provide a paving area that is more in scale with the character of the neighborhood versus a large expanse of pavement surface. Michael J. R.iehm,AIA Riehm Owenby Planners Architects Page 7 February 25,2016 23. Grades and Curves. (HCC §23-50). The request is for exceptions to the required minimum standards for grades of a street, including, waiving vertical and horizontal curves for the purpose to have increased design flexibility in developing a more creative master plan and community environment than wouldn't be possible through the use of a typical subdivision layout and standards. Street design is critical to achieving this goal, and as such, design flexibility is required. The street layout is critical to achieving this goal, and as such, design flexibility is required. 24. Sidewalks. (HCC §23-89). The requirement is that sidewalks be constructed in accordance with the specifications of the Department of Public Works.The project proposes sidewalks on one or both sides of the street but design flexibility may vary from the specifications of the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works in order to create the desired neighborhood character. 25. Curb and Gutters. (HCC §23-91). Curb and gutters are required to be constructed in accordance to specification of the Department of Public Works. The request for flexibility in the standard details for curb and gutters increases design flexibility in developing a more creative master plan and community environment. This curbing profile is more in character with a traditional neighborhood setting than the typical curb and gutter details typically found in our modem subdivision. Curb and gutters and/or rolled curbs shall be used if required by the civil engineer of this project. 26. Street Lights. (HCC §23-93). Street lights are required to conform to standard specification of the Department of Public Works and construction be made a part of the contract and installed as part of the required subdivision improvements. The applicant requests that custom street light fixtures be allowed to provide design flexibility to choose a different housing color and decorative style that what is permitted by the county standards. 27. Street Name and Traffic Signs. (HCC §23-94). Street names and traffic signs are required to be erected at each street intersection and shall be approved and the type and location of signs be subject to standard specifications of the Dept. of Public Works. This request is to allow for customizing the street name and traffic sign fixtures to reinforce the desired character of the neighborhood and to achieve design goals. The applicant proposes to meet AASHTD specifications. 28. Right-of-Way Improvement. (HCC §23-95). The request is to waive the requirement to improve entire street right-of-way in conformance with standard specifications of Department of Public Works.The proposed project design requires flexibility in how the right-of-way areas are treated, such as pavers, street trees and landscaping, which will be used to develop the Michael J. Riehm, AIA Riehrn Owensby Planners Architects Page 8 February 25,2016 desired character of the neighborhood. Design flexibility is required to develop an intimate, human scaled pedestrian friendly environment. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 29. Subject Property. The subject property (TMK: 7-7-008:0121), hereinafter, :referred to as "Project area", consists of a total of 11.415 acres and is currently vacant_ The property is situated within the District of North Kona, Hawaii approximately 4.5 miles south of Kailua- Kona town and 11 miles south of the Kona International Airport. It is also located on the east (mauka) side of Alii Drive. Elevations within the Project area range from approximately 68 feet at the lowest point to 140 feet at the highest point providing an elevation range of 72 feet. The Project area is in a lava field in its natural state, overgrown with a variety of grasses and trees with various archaeological remnants. 30. USDA Soff Type. The property is listed as type 373 —Punalu`u extremely rocky peat, which consists of thin organic soils over pahoehoe lava bedrock. 31. Land Study Bureau (LSB) Soil Rating. The property is rated `E"or"Very Poor". 32. ALISH. The property is not rated as Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii. 33. FIRI"rainage. The property is located in Tone'W',which is an area determined by FEMA to be located outside of the 500-year floodplain. The proposed roadway design incorporates curb, gutters, and sidewalks to reduce surface water and sediment runoff. Drainage will be controlled through swales, drywells, and natural drainage ways that promote infiltration over runoff. 34. Flora and Fauna. Vegetation at the site is characterized by koa haole scrub land. There are no species of flora or fauna currently listed as endangered, threatened or proposed for listing under either the State or Federal endangered species programs. 35.Archaeological/CulturallHlstoric Resources. An archaeological inventory survey of the project area (TMK; 7-7-008:121), Land of Kapala`alaea 2, North Kona, District, Island of Hawaii is dated January 2006, and revised on September 2006. The Archaeological Survey was conducted by Alan E Haun, Ph.D. and Dave Henry, B.S., Haun &Associates. The archaeological inventory survey(AIS)identified 14 archaeological sites comprised of 172 component features. Three of the historic properties that were identified (SIHP 50-10-37- 6366, 6368, and 6369) have been recommended for no further work, One ceremonial/ habitation site complex(SIHP 24534)has been recommended for preservation, one burial site Michael J. R.iehm,AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 9 February 25,2016 (SIHP 24842)has been recommended for preservation,one remaining sites have been prepared for the sites recommended for data recovery. Our records indicate that a data recovery plan (Huan and Henry 2010) has been prepared for the sites recommended for data recovery, and accepted by SHPD via. correspondence LOG NO 2010.034, DOC NO 1005MD37. However, SHPD has no record that the data recovery field work has been verified as completed. The Petitioner shall complete all the remaining archaeological plans and shall comply with all the requirements and preservation measures recommended and approved by the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD). The Petitioner will also follow all applicable laws and regulations should any archeological features or remains are found during site work or construction. 36. View Plane/Coastal Resources. The subject property is located mauka of Alii Drive with an approximate slope of 6%. All structures, including dwellings, will be constructed in conformance with the applicant's stated 35' height limit. 37. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses. The property is situated within an area primarily designated for resort and residential uses within the State Land Use Urban District. Immediate surrounding areas are zoned RS-7.5 and RM-3, A-5a. The White Sands Beach Subdivision and the Keauhou View Estates lie to the north and northwest. The property immediate to the south where a construction right-of-way was secured is zoned A-5a. The Property essentially resides within the urban area as defined in the Kona CDP.The Project will establish residential lots that are consistent with permitted density allowable by zoning,and will remain consistent with residential uses that prevail within the surrounding area. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 38. State Land Use District. Urban. 39. County Zoning. Single-Family Residential — 7,504 sq. ft. (RS-7.5). Minimum building site average width is 60' and minimum yards are 15' for front and rear and 8' on sides.The subject property was rezoned from A-5a to RS 7.5,effective February 9,2009 by Ordinance 09-8 and is subject to conditions of approval. (See EXHIBIT C—Ordinance 49-8). 40. General Plan Designation. The area is designated Low Density Urban by the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map. This request would be consistent with the General Plan LUPAG Map designation and will complement the goals,policies, and courses of action of the Economic-North Kona,Natural Beauty, and Land Use- Single-Family Residential and Resort Elements of the General Plan. Michael J. Riehm,AIA Rlehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 10 February 25,2016 41. Kona Community Development Plan. The Kona Community Development Plan (KCDP) was adopted by the County Council on September 25,2008(Ordinance 08-131).The proposed development is located within the KCDP Planning Area and the "Kona Urban Area" or the Urban Core of Kailua-Kona. The Project conforms to the following Kona Community Development Plan(KCDP)"Guiding Principles": A. Guiding Policy 1. Project Kona Natural Resources & Culture. The petition Area, in an already urbanized area, has less impact on our natural resources verses a development in outlying rural areas requiring rezoning and the consumption of more agricultural land and natural landscape. By developing in already urbanized area, suburban sprawl is; mitigated in our undeveloped areas and more of the natural environment can be preserved by this approach. B. Guiding Policy 2.Provide Connectivity&Transportation Choices. The Project provides a number of connection to existing and future streets that will provide alternative transportation routes that will disperse automobile trips and reduce their length, while not compromising the through functions of arterials and major collectors with excessive intersections. C. Guiding Policy 3. Provide Housing Choices. The master plan concept provides a higher quality,residential environment than is normally found in our standard subdivision communities. Through the use of a Planned Unit Development, common area landscaped spaces, and streets designed for pedestrians, a more livable community can be provided than what would be possible if the Project were designed utilizing a typical subdivision layout and County decidable roadway standards. 42. Special Management Area(SMA).The Property is located approximately 800 feet mauka of the shoreline and has an approved SMA 07-040024 effective June 30, 2008 by the Planning Commission. {See EXHIBIT D—SMA} 43. Density. Based on applying the required 6,000 square feet minimum land area per dwelling unit or each separate rentable unit against the total land area of 11.415 acres, a total of 62 dwelling units would be the maximum density that is allowable by zoning. Should the parcel be subdivided into the minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet approximately 66 lots would be allowable. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES 44. Access. Access to the Project area will be provided by one of two roadways as stipulated in Change of Zone Ordinance 09-8. Alternate 1 is to construct a new alternate access road from Michael T. Riehm, AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 11 February 25,2016 Ali'i Drive thru TMK:7-8-008:001.,the vacant property to the west and to include a left turning lane on Ali'i Drive. Alternate 2 would be improving ween Kalama Street and Naniloa Street along the lower northern boundary of the property. According to Ordinance 09-8, should this alternate be chosen - curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements shall be constructed along the mauka side of Naniloa Street and along the south side of Queen Kalama Street to Alii Drive. A dedicated left turn lane shall also be constructed at the Aiii Drive intersection. In addition to Alternate 1 or 2,plans shall also depict a connection to Naniloa Street and future road stub out midway along the south property boundary. The property is subject to Change of Zone Ordinance 09-5 Condition F, G,H &I regarding access improvements. The Project's internal roadway system is considered a minor street and in accordance with Ordinance 09-0, shall be constructed to County dedicable standards and dedicated to the County. The applicant has secured a temporary, non-exclusive construction right of entry from the adjacent property to the west and may pursue making this temporary access a permanent roadway once they decide whether they will commit to the Naniloa Drive access or the Ali'i Drive access as stipulated in the Change of Zone Ordinance. In the PUD request,the applicant proposes both County dedicated and private streets. Streets that provide interconnectivity to adjacent parcels would be designed and built to Kona CDP Village Guidelines street types ST-52-34 or ST-50-32 and dedicated. Dedicable streets would have an approximate right-of-way of 50-52 feet with varying drive lanes of 18-19 feet, and with parking,planters and sidewalks on both sides of the street. The applicant also proposes that streets that do not provide interconnectivity would remain private and built to the guidelines included in the Kona CDP as street types ST-52-34 or ST- 50-32.These are described in the Master Pian as Drivecourts which would also be incorporated with a right-of-way of 34 Beet with 20 foot drive lanes, planters,and sidewalks. Cul-de-sacs with turn-around areas within the internal roadway system shall be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles and will be coordinated with the Hawaii County Fire Department(HFD)through HFD review of the subdivision construction drawings. The applicant proposes that the county maintain all dedicable roadways, curb, gutters and sidewalks street signs and streetlights while the Home Owners Association (HOA) shall maintain the street landscaping, street signs and street lighting fixtures within the private roadways. It should be noted that Kona CDP Village Guideline street types are currently not designed to County dedicable standards. 45. Water.According to Department of Water Supply, 50 units of water were allotted to the entire subdivision providing adequate water from a potable water system. The development will be Michael J. Riehm,AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 12 February 25,2016 subject to covenants to include conservation measures for water usage. The applicant has submitted data and water usage calculations prepared by a registered professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii to support LEER design criteria. 46. Sewer. The County of Hawaii Department of Environmental Management-Wastewater Branch,Kealakehe Sewage Treatment Plant is the treatment plant that will serve the Project. 47. Electricity, Telephone and Cable TV. Power, communication and cable services are accessible to the Property from Alii Drive vial the proposed road connection to the project site or from Naniloa Drive. Power service is provided by Hawaii Electric Light Company, a subsidiary of Hawaiian Electric Company. Telephone service is provided by Hawaiian Telcom, 48. Parks. To comply with the park requirements in Ordinance 09-8, the applicants are required to provide 5,000 sq. feet of recreational area on the Naniloa Street end of the development as depicted on the master plan. Additional requirements will be met by constructing a minimum three-acre public neighborhood park on TMK: 7-7-008:030. (See EXHIBIT E—Memo from Dept. of Park and Recreation dated November 9,2015) 49. Other Services. Fire protection is provided by the County from its Kailua-Kona Fire Station on Palani Road approximately 4 miles from the project site. Police protection is provided by the Hawaii County Police Department operating from Kealakehe located approximately 7 miles north of the project site.Refuse(solid waste)will be collected by private contractors and hauled to the West Hawaii landfill for disposal. Security gate will be installed and a central mailbox kiosk will be located at the entry. AGENCY COMMENTS 50. Police Department(HPD): See attached memorandum dated September 25,2014. (EXHIBIT Fl 51. Fire Department(HFD): See attached memorandum dated March 16,2015. (EXHIBIT G) 52. Department of Public Works(DPW)Engineering Division. See attached memoranda dated April 7, 2415. (EXHIBIT HI) 53. Department of Public Works (DPW) Traffic Division: See attached memorandum dated March 18, 2015. (EXHIBIT A2) 54. Department of Environmental Management(DEMI)—Waste Water Division, See attached memoranda dated March 20, 2015. (EXHIBIT Il) Michael J. R.iehm, AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 13 February 25,2016 55. Department of Environmental Management (DEMI) —Solid Waste Division. See attached memoranda dated March 27, 2015. (EXHIBIT 12) 56.Department of Water Supply (DWS): See attached memorandum dated March 31, 2015. (EXHIBIT J) 57.DLNR—Historic Preservation Division SHPD): See lever dated April 10, 2015. (EXHIBIT K) 58.NA ALA HELE: See attached letter dated May 13, 2016. (EXHIBIT L) PUBLIC COMMENTS 59. Meredith Bolton: Letter dated March 24, 2015 objecting to the FUD citing traffic concerns. (EXHIBIT M) 60. Ronald and Patricia Worrell: E-mails(2)slated March 19,2015 and April 14,2015 objecting to the PUD citing concerns regarding the usage of Naniloa Drive for ingress and egress purposes. (Exhibit N) 61. Henry and Gale Hagemeyer: E-mail sent on March 27, 2015 objecting to the approval of PUD citing traffic. (EXHIBIT O) 62. Applicant's Response to Public Comments:Two letters dated April 10,2015 and letter dated April 20,2015. (EXHIBIT P) FINDINGS- CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF PUD 15-000032 This PUD is granted in part in accordance with the following criteria and findings: 1. The construction of the Project shall begin within a reasonable period of time, from the date of full approval and shall be completed within a reasonable period of time. Once the PUD is approved, the applicant will submit subdivision application. Once Final Subdivision is approved, the applicant anticipates moving forward with, total site work and infrastructural improvements. Dwelling construction would follow with completion of sales for the 62 lots to be within 4 years from issuance of Final Subdivision Approval. 2. The proposed development substantially conforms to the General Plan and any applicable Community Development Plan. The proposed residential units are consistent with the General Plan LUPAG Map designation Michael J. Riehm,AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 14 February 25,2016 for the Property of Low Density Urban(LDU).The Low Density Urban designation allows for residential and related functions (residential up to 35 units per acre). The proposed development will consist of 62 single family residential lots ranging in size from 3,082 sq. ft. to 6,541 sq. ff. The Project,with the approval of this PUD,will be developed at a density less than the allowable density of 66 lots and not will not exceed the overall maximum density permitted by the zoning designation. The Low Density Urban designation allows"residential, with ancillary community and public uses, and neighborhood and convenience-type of commercial uses." The proposed residential development would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation. The project area is located within. the Kona Urban Area in the- KCDP and is consistent with the Guiding Principles of the KCDP. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Code, the land use policies of the General Plan, and the KCDP. 3. The proposed development shall constitute an environment of sustained desirability and stability, shall be in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighborhood, and shall result In an intensity of land utilization no higher than and standards of open space at least as high as permitted or as otherwise specified for the district in which this development occurs. The proposed 62-lot residential subdivision will provide a density that will not exceed the maximum density permitted by zoning, which is calculated at 62 lots for 11.415 acre Project Site. With the approval of this PUD,the Applicant will be able to configure its proposed lots and selected roadways to realize the type of residential use that is generally consistent with uses within this particular area of North Kona. Approval of the requested exceptions would enable the applicant to create a smaller-scaled,neighborhood-friendly residential development with landscaped common open spaces primarily along the northern property boundary, and a streetseape that is pedestrian-oriented and walkable. Some of the characteristics that promote this feeling of a neighborhood-friendly community and create a sense of place require exceptions from County standards and will not compromise existing and potential land uses within the surrounding area being approved. There are three written objections (Ronald and Patricia Worrell, Meredith Bolton and Henry and Gale Hagemeyer); all three cite additional traffic within their subdivision (White Sand Beach Subdivision) as their main concern. It should be noted that moth Queen Kalama Street and Naniloa Street are county-maintained roadways which are allowable accesses for the proposed development in according with Ordinance. 09-8. Should Queen Kalama and Naniloa Streets be used,the owner is required to construct significant roadway improvements that Michael J. Riehm,AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 15 February 25,2016 include curb,gutter,and sidewalk improvements along the east(mauka)side of Naniloa Street and along the west side of Queen Kalarna Street to Alii Drive. Other improvements include: pavement widening, signs, traffic markings, street lights, drainage improvements, and relocation of utilities meeting with approval of Department of Public Works. Further, as an option, the applicant would develop an alternate access road through the adjacent property to the west(TMK: 7-7-:048:011) from Ali'i Drive to the project site. A construction agreement has been secured and consideration is being given to making this a primary access should an agreement be reached. If determined to be a permanent access, this roadway shall meet with the approval of the County of Hawaii — Department of Public Works and built to County dedicable standards. Also,one of the conditions of this PUD,is that the mail kiosk(receptacle) be located off the new access road from Alii Drive. Certain exceptions not consistent with this criteria are DENIED and are listed in the below EXCEPTIONS DENIED section. These exceptions would affect setback standards for accessory structures along the south property boundary and impact the wellbeing of adjacent property owners, who are not a part of this subdivision and are therefore, denied. Minimum Yards or setbacks are required to protect the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the County. Further, standard setback requirements for those properties along the south property boundary shall meet the minimum 15-foot rear yard (setback) requirements consistent with the R5-7.5 zoned district as depicted in the applicant's Master Plan. 4. The development of a harmonious, integrated whole justifies exceptions, if required, to the normal requirements of the Zoning and Subdivision Codes, and that the contemplated arrangements or use, make it desirable to apply regulations and requirements differing from those ordinarily applicable under the district regulations. The project is designed to address the needs and lifestyle of those residents who want to live in a residential community that promotes social interaction,encourages outdoor activities,and is pedestrian oriented. The project consists of 62 single-family residential lots with a streetscape designed to create a sense of place. Emphasis is placed on the design of the streets to provide a safe setting for pedestrians and to mitigate the speed of the automobile. The granting of this PUD will allow for greater flexibility by implementing design guidelines established to enhance lot design and maximize the property's features to be complementary to existing surrounding land uses. The property is located in Zone "V, which is an area determined by FEMA to be located outside of the 500-year floodplain. Alternative roadway design standards will be implemented to encourage lower traffic speeds. Drainage will be contained on site as required the County of Hawaii Standards. A system of drywells and other mitigated measures will be utilized to contain the increased runoff as required by Hawaii County. Michael J. Riehm, AZA. Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 16 February 25,2016 The granting of this PUD will allow for greater flexibility in addressing design and aesthetic issues to allow some of the roadways to be constructed to promote a combination of casual pedestrian movements with traffic using alternate standard requirements. Roadway design exceptions that would be inconsistent with this criteria are DENIED and listed in the EXCEPTIONS DENIED section below. Incorporating reduced and alternate design standards, although desirable, are currently only acceptable for nondedicable roads. Unfortunately, alternate roadway standards as proposed, are not acceptable as a County dedicable roadways. Therefore, until amendments are made to Ordinance 09-8, only the proposed drivecourts and access and utility easements are allowable to be constructed with exceptions. The request for exceptions to construct improvements to Naniloa Street and its extension, the primary spine roads running east to west within the property, and stub outs would not be in conformance with Change of Zone Ordinance 09-8 and County dedicable standards, and are therefore denied.The ordinance requires that roads be constructed to county dedicable standards meeting with requirements of the Department of Public Works. Although the applicant proposes to construct streets to be dedicated in accordance with the Kona CDP Village Design Guidelines ST-50-32 and ST-52-34,these standards are currently not accepted by Dept. of Public Works as dedicable roadway standards. Based on the above criteria and findings, the exceptions are listed below as approved and denied, accordingly: EXCEPTIONS APPROVED—CHAPTER 25 ZONING Based on the above findings,the following exceptions are APPROVED: 1. Minimum Street Frontage. (Hawai`i County Code §25-4-30). The request is approved to allow the street frontage of a lot to be less than the required 50%of building site average width for lots other than flag lots and those at the ends of cul-de-sac. 2. Minimum Building Site Area; Minimum Average Width. (Hawai`i County Code §25-4- 31). This request to allow different shaped lots, their sizes and widths is approved. In reviewing the exhibits of the lot layout,we find that sufficient buildable area and lot shape is being provided. 3. Reduction of Building Site below Minimum Area. (Hawai`i County Code §25-4-32)_ This request is approved to allow for lot sizes ranging from 3,100 square feet to 6,501 square feet in lieu of the minimum 7,500 square feet lot sizes required by its RS-7.5 zoning designation. In reviewing the exhibits of the lot layout, we find that sufficient buildable area is being provided. Michael J. Riehm,AIA Riehm Dwensby Planners Architects Page 17 Febmary 25,2015 4. General Requirements for Yards and Open Space. (Hawai`i County Code§25-4-40).This request is approved in part. Approval is limited to the configurations shown on Exhibits 1 to 9.The request for alternate minimum yards within the zoned district due to smaller lot sizes is approved,however,the renaming or relabeling of yards(front,rear,sides)is denied.Confusion will result if yards are named other than the standard front,rear,side for every lot.This project shall also comply with Building code requirements for yard and setbacks from common property lines which is not a part of this approval. The project incorporates the use of landscaped open spaces and other unique street arrangements to provide a"sense of place"for the residents and to create spatial diversity. 5. Corner Building Sites. (Hawai`i County Code §25-442). The request to allow alternate yard/setbacks is approved as they are inter-developmental in nature and do not infringe on surrounding properties. 6. Fences and Accessory Structures. (Hawai`i County Code§25-4-43). The request is twofold and APPROVED for 6A and DENIED for part 6B_ A. Allow for retaining walls that exceed 6 feet in height when used to retain the grade be permitted to be on the boundary line and without any front, side, or rear yard requirements is approved. Due to the prevalent slopes on the Island of Hawaii,retaining walls are often required at the property line to manipulate the grade to provide buildable lot pads. These retaining walls should be permitted at the property lines without any front,side or rear yard requirements in order to develop a more useable site area. This aspect of the request is approved as a safety issue. The applicant shall comply with applicable requirements of the Dept. of Public Works for wails and Hawaii County Code Section 22-2.2 Intersection Sight Distance. B. This request is also to allow any accessory structure, architectural feature, wall, fence, or any other free standing architectural feature over six feet in height to extend into any required front, side or rear yard is approved in part. These features may be in the form of walls, gates, arbors and trellises which in some cases may be over six feet in height. Freedom in location of these items is critical to developing an intimate neighborhood character. The locations of these items will be pre-determined and the CCR's will control any abuse of this exception by the residents of the neighborhood. This exception is APPROVED for lots that do not abut the adjacent TMK: 7-8-010:004 to the south and also approved for those lots that abut TMK: 7-8-010:004 which construct retaining walls over 6 feet in height. This exception is DENIED for those lots abutting adjacent TMK: 7-8-010:004 that do not construct retaining walls over 6' in height. We agree that a variety of free-standing Michael I. Riehm,AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 18 February 25,2016 architectural features may be used to create the desired character and ambiance of the neighborhood however,it should not negatively impact adjacent property owners who are not covered by this exception. This exception shall be detailed on a master plan submitted to the Planning Department prior to submission of any individual building permit applications. The master plan shall identify the locations and heights of all "architectural features" proposed to extend into required open space areas. 7. Permitted Projections into Yards and Open Spaces. (HawaPi County Code§25-4-44). The applicant requests that Section 25-4-44(a)(1) for additional exception to allow trellises to project into the required yard. This exception would cover and allow for trellises, attached or detached to the house to exceed 6 feet in height, be permitted any distance into the required side yards.These trellises open projections and see through design. Other requests are covered under Fences and Accessory Structures above. 8. Minimum Building Site Average Width. (Hawai`i County Code §25-5-6), This request is approved to allow minimum building site average width to be waived in order to create smaller lots and a more human-scaled community. 9. Minimum Yards. (Hawai`i County Code §25-5-7) This request is approved to allow for varying side yards where one is smaller than the other; while maintaining sufficient distance between the buildings.Applicant shall comply with Building Code requirements for setbacks from common property lines.This section is approved as shown in Applicant's Exhibits 1-9. 10. Other Regulations. (Hawai.`i County Code §25-5-8). The dimensions of the lots are developed to provide the spatial characteristics of the neighborhood,especially in defining the landscaped open spaces. The requirement of building site areas,building site average widths and yards is arbitrary in lieu of the Project's desired goal to create a human scaled and pedestrian friendly environment with a"sense of place". The request is approved to support the smaller lot sizes that are proposed. EXCEPTIONS APPROVED—CHAPTER 23 Based on the above findings, the following exceptions are APPROVED: Note that Items #3-13, are only approved for what are specifically described in the Master Plan as drivecourts and access and utility casements,which will be non-dedicable roadways in private ownership. Michael J. Riehm, AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 19 February 25,2015 1. Block Sizes.(HCC §23-29).This request to allow block sizes to be less than 400 feet in length, to encourage pedestrians to walk versus drive to a destination is approved. Studies have shown that pedestrians will walk versus drive when a destination is within a five minute walking distance or 1,350 feet. Therefore,blocks less than 400 feet in length may encourage residents to walk to visit neighbors versus driving. This is approved for non-dedicable roadways. 2. Lot Sizes, Shape, and Setback Line. (HCC §23-32). As part of the application for a PUD, exceptions are requested herein concerning the standards for lot size,width, shape, orientation and building setback lines which are different from the standards detailed in the Zoning Code. In reviewing the exhibits of the lot layout, we find that buildable areas are consistent with the requested design elements, and therefore, this exception is approved for non-dedicable roadways. 3. Access to Lot from Street. (HCC §23-34). An access and utility easement is used in some areas, in lieu of a public street or private street, to provide both vehicular access and utility service to some of the lots. In reviewing the exhibits of the lot layout this is approved for the non-dedicable roadways. 4. Lot Side Lines. (HCC§23-35). The sidelines of the lots that front the curved interior roadway are designed to be parallel to each other to create a sense of consistency with the placement of the homes versus the side lines running at right angles to the curved street. In reviewing the exhibits of the lot layout, this exception is approved for the non-dedicable roadways. 5. Cul-de-sacs. (HCC §23-48). The purpose of requesting a FUD designation for the project is to have increased design flexibility in developing a more creative master plan and pedestrian oriented environment than would be possible through the use of a typical subdivision layout and standards. The design of the street and cul-de-sacs is critical to achieving this goal and flexibility. Also, where a cul-de-sac is provided., the street right-of-way is squarer in configuration and shall be designated as a drivecourt. These size and shape of the drivecourt is used to provide a paving area that is more in scale with the character of the neighborhood versus a large expanse of pavement surface. Turnarounds shall be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles as recommended by the Hawaii County Fire Department as well as delivery activities. This is approved for the drivecourts and access and utility easements as described in the Master Plan. 6. Minimum Right-of-Way and Pavement Widths. (HCC §23-41). The Project's internal roadway system will incorporate both County dedicable and non-dedicable streets in order to snake for a more neighborhood and pedestrian friendly environment. This is approved for non- dedicable streets. Michael J. Riehm, AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 20 February 25,2016 7. Intersection Angles; Corner Radius. (HCC §23-45). One of the major impediments to safe pedestrian movement in a residential community is the large turning radius at street intersections. The large radius increase the walking distance from curb to curb,requiring the pedestrian to spend more time in the intersection.With this increased distance, the pedestrian must calculate, far in advance, an oncoming vehicle, to determine if they are able to safely cross the street. Intersections shall meet with HCC Section 22-2-2 intersection sight Distance. Sight distance easements shall be provided on the final plat map. Curb radii shall also be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles as recommended by the Hawaii County Fixe Department as well as delivery activities. This is approved for non-dedicable streets. 8. Grades and Curves. (HCC §23-50). The purpose of requesting a PUD designation for the project is to have increased design flexibility in developing a more creative master plan and community environment than would typically be possible through the use of a typical subdivision layout and standards. Street design is critical to achieving this goal, and as such, design flexibility is required. The street layout is critical to achieving this goal, and as such, design flexibility is required. This is approved for non-dedicable streets. 9. Sidewalks. (HCC §23-89). The project shall have sidewalks on one or both sides of the street but design flexibility is requested which may vary from the specifications of the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works in order to create the desired neighborhood character. This is approved for non.-dedicable streets. 10. Curb and Gutters. (HCC §23-91). The purpose of requesting a PUD designation for the project is to have increased design flexibility in developing a more creative master plan and community environment. This curbing profile is more in character with a traditional neighborhood setting than the typical curb and gutter details typically found in our modern subdivision. Curb and gutters and/or rolled curbs shall be used if required by the civil engineer of this project. This is approved for non-dedicable streets. 11. Street Lights. (HCC §23-93)_ The use of a custom street light fixture will provide design flexibility to choose a different housing color and decorative style that what is permitted by the county standards. This is approved for non-dedicable streets. 12. Street Name and Traffic Signs. (HCC §23-94). This request is to allow for customizing the street name and traffic signage to reinforce the desired character of the neighborhood and to achieve design goals. The applicant proposes to meet AASHTO specifications. This is approved for non-dedicable streets. 13. Right-of-Way Improvement. (HCC §23-95). The right-of-ways may have a variety of treatments such as pavers, street and landscaping, which will be.used to develop the desired character of the neighborhood. Design flexibility is require in this area to be able to develop Michael J. Riehm, AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 21 February 25,2016 an intimate, human scaled pedestrian friendly environment. This is approved for non- dedicable streets. EXCEPTIONS DENIED —CHAPTER 25 ZONING Based on the above findings,the following exceptions are DENIED: 1. General Requirements for Yards and Open Space. (Hawai`i County Code §25-4-40). Approval is limited to the configurations shown on Exhibits 1 to 9. The request to rename yards other than what is standard practice(front,rear,sides)is DENIED. Confusion will result if yards are named other than the standard front,rear,side for every lot.The reduced yards can be accomplished without renaming the yards. This project shall also comply with Building code requirements for yard and setbacks from common property lines which are not a part of this approval. 2. Fences and Accessory Structures. (Hawai`i County Code §25-4-43). As stated in the above section on Exceptions Approved for Chapter 25 6A, and restated here for consistency. The request is twofold and APPROVED for 6A and DENIED for part 6B below. A. Allow for retaining walls that exceed 6 feet in height when used to retain the grade be permitted to be on the boundary line and without any front,side,or rear yard requirements is approved. Due to the prevalent slopes on the Island of Hawaii,retaining walls are often required at the property line to manipulate the grade to provide buildable lot pads. These retaining walls should be permitted at the property lines without any front,side or rear yard requirements in order to develop a more useable site area. This aspect of the request is APPROVED as a safety issue.The applicant shall comply with applicable requirements of the Dept. of Public Works for walls and Hawaii County Code Section 22-2.2 Intersection Sight Distance. B. This request is also to allow any accessory structure, architectural feature, wall, fence, or any other free standing architectural feature over six feet in height to extend into any required front, side or rear yard is approved in part. These features maybe in the form of walls, gates, arbors and trellises which in some cases may be over six feet in height. Freedom in location of these items is critical to developing an intimate neighborhood character. The locations of these items will be pre-determined and the CCR's will control any abuse of this exception by the residents of the neighborhood, This exception is APPROVED in part for lots that do not abut the adjacent TMK: 7-8- 010:044 to the south and also approved for those lots that abut TMK.: 7-8-010:404 which construct retaining walls over 6 feet in height. Michael J. Riehm,AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 22 February 25,2016 This exception is DENIED for those lots abutting adjacent TMK: 7-8-010:004 that do not construct retaining walls over 5' in height. A variety of free-standing architectural features may be used to create the desired character and ambiance of the neighborhood however,it should not negatively impact adjacent property owners who are not covered by this exception. This exception shall be detailed on a master plan submitted to the Planning Department prior to submission of any individual building permit applications. The master plan shall identify the locations and heights of all "architectural features" proposed to extend into required open space areas. EXCEPTIONS DENIED —CHAPTER 23 (SUBDIVISIONS) The following exceptions are DENIED as related to streets described in Ordinance 09-8, which shall be constructed to County dedicable standards. This denial affects the entire main spine road running east-west within the development, the Naniloa Street extension within the subject property,improvements along Naniloa Street and Queen Kalama Street, the stub out along the southern property boundary,and a proposed roadway(if constructed) through TMK: 7-7-008:401,connecting the subject parcel to Alii Drive. 1. Through Lots; Planting Screen Easement. (HCC §23-35). There are no proposed through lots in the Master Plan and they shall not be permitted. This is not approved for County dedicable roadways, 2. Minimum Right-of-Way and Pavement Widths. (HCC §23-41). The Project's internal roadway system will incorporate both County dedicable and private streets in order to make for a more neighborhood and pedestrian friendly environment. New dedicable streets shall meet the maximum grade allowed under the current design guidelines for compliance to the .American with Disabilities Act to the maximum extent practicable. Pavers and stamped concrete are not approved for those streets to be dedicated to the County of Hawaii. This exception is not approved for County dedicable roadways. 3. Intersection Angles; Corner Radius.(HCC §23-45). One of the major impediments to safe pedestrian movement in a residential community, is the large turning radius at street intersections. The large radius increase the walking distance from curb to curb, requiring the pedestrian to spend more time in the intersection.With this increased distance, the pedestrian must calculate, far in advance, an oncoming vehicle, to determine if they are able to safely cross the street. Intersections shall meet with HCG Section 22-2-2 intersection sight Distance. Sight distance easements shall be provided on the final plat map. Curb radii shall also be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles as recommended by the Hawaii County Fire Michael J. Riehm,AIA Riehm Owensby Planncrs Architects Page 23 February 25,2015 Department as well as delivery activities.This exception is not approved for County dicable roadways. 4. Grades and Curves. (HCC §23-50). The purpose of requesting a PUD designation for the project is to have increased design flexibility in developing a more creative master plan and community environment than would typically be possible through the use of a typical subdivision layout and standards. Street design is critical to achieving this goal and design flexibility is required. The applicant shall be required to design the streets meeting with AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets for an appropriate design speed and with maximum grades in accordance with DPW policy. New dedicable streets shall meet the maximum grade allowed under the current design guidelines for compliance to the American with Disabilities Act to the maximum extent practicable. Construction plans shall undergo review by the Disability and Communications Access Board (DCAB)in accordance with HRS 103-50. This exception is not approved for County dedicable roadways. 5. Sidewalks. (HCC §23-89)_ The project shall have sidewalks on one or both sides of the street but design flexibility is request which may vary from the specifications of the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works in order to create the desired neighborhood character. This exception is not approved for County dedicable roadways. G. Curb and Gutters. (HCC §23-91). The purpose of requesting a FUD designation for the project is to have increased design flexibility in developing a more creative master plan and community environment. This curbing profile is more in character with a traditional neighborhood setting than the typical curb and gutter details typically found in our modern subdivision. Curb and gutters and/or rolled curbs shall be used if required by the civil engineer of this project.This exception is not approved for County dedicable roadways. 7. Street Lights. (HCC §23-93). The use of a custom street light fixture will provide design flexibility to choose a different housing color and decorative style that what is permitted by the county standards. Streetlights for dedicable streets shall meet with approval of Department of Public Works---Traffic Division and Hawaii County Code Article 9 Outdoor Lighting. This exception is not approved for County dedicable roadways. 8. Street Name and Traffic Signs.(HCC §23-94). This request is to allow for customizing the street name and traffic signage to reinforce the desired character of the neighborhood and to achieve design goals. The applicant proposes to meet AASHTO specifications.New dedicable streets shall meet the maximum grade allowed under the current design guidelines for compliance to the American with Disabilities Act to the maximum extent practicable. The Department of Public Works—Traffic Division opposes any variances from signs and marking requirements on County Street. The engineer of record shall be required to specify signs and Michael J.Riehm,AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 24 February 25,2015 markings in accordance with the Manual on Uniform traffic control Devices,meeting with the approval of DPW Traffic Division, for uniformity, This exception is not approved for County dedicable roadways. 9. Right-of-Way Improvement. (HCC §23-95). The right-of-ways may have a variety of treatments such as pavers, street and landscaping, which will be used to develop the desired character of the neighborhood. Design flexibility is require in this area to be able to develop an intimate,human scaled pedestrian friendly environment. New dedicable streets shall meet the maximum grade allowed under the current design guidelines for compliance to the American with Disabilities Act to the maximum extent practicable. Pavers and stamped concrete are not approved for those streets to be dedicated to the County of Hawaii. This exception is not approved for County dedicable roadways_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The Planning Director approves the exceptions specified above for Hawaii i Investors, LLC Planned Unit Development(PUD 15-004032) subject to the following conditions: 1. Permit Runs with the Land.The applicant,its successors, or assigns,shall be responsible for complying with all of the stated conditions of approval. 2. Master Plan and Strut Layout. The proposed Planned Unit Development shall be developed in a manner, substantially, as represented by the applicant within the application for this Planned Unit Development. 3. Historical and Archaeological Considerations. The Archaeological Inventory Survey reviewed by the DLNR-SHPD has determined that no historic properties will be affected by this project. In the event any historic properties are encountered, the project shall be subject to further review by DLNR-SHPD. The Petitioner will complete all the archaeological plans and will comply with all the requirements and preservation measures recommended and approved by the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD)_ The Petitioner shall follow all applicable laws and regulations should any archaeological features or remains be found during any site work or construction. The applicant shall provide SHPD with a preservation pian for SIHP 24534, a burial treatment plan for SIHP 24842. These mitigation plans shall be submitted to SHPD for their review and approval. A copy of the approved mitigation plans shall submitted to the Planning Director prior to the issuance of any land alteration permits. 4. Potable Water System. Potable water shall be provided and extended to all of the buildable lots. Michael J. Riehm,AIA Riehm Owensby Planners Architects Page 25 February 25,2016 5. Roadway Design Guidelines. The exceptions approved from Chapter 23(Subdivisions)only applies to nota-dedicable roadways within the subject property that are identified as drivecourts and access utility easements in the Master Plan Concept. All other streets including the proposed roadway connection to Naniloa Drive,proposed roadway connection to Alii Drive(through TMK: 7-7-008:001), the entire interior spine minor street running east to west within the subject property, stub outs, and crosswalks; shall be improved to County standards and dedicated to the County. All dedicable roadways shall be constructed to follow the guidelines incorporated in the Hawaii Statewide Uniform Design Manual for Streets and Highways or the applicable AASHTO design guide for the appropriate design speed or approved as alternate dedicable standards by the Department of Public Works. The geometric design of the interior subdivision roads should be based on the AASHTO Guidelines for Geometric Design of Low Volume Roads (average daily traffic volume of less than 400 vehicle trips per day) or approved as alternate dedicable standards. 6. Utilities. All utilities shall be made available to all buildable lots. 7. Construction Plan Review by Fire Department. The Applicant shall consult with the HFD to ensure conformance of roads, water, and placement of LP Gas tanks for emergency and firefighting purposes within the Project Site to meet the minimum requirements of the Fire Code. Besides the DPW and DWS,construction plans shall also be submitted to the HFD for review. 8. No Additional Dwellings. The Applicant shall record a declaration affecting all proposed units within the Planned Unit Development which shall give notice that the terms of this Planned Unit Development approval shall prohibit the construction of a second dwelling unit on each lot. The proposed declaration is to be recorded with the Bureau of Conveyances by the applicant at their cost and expense. A copy of the recorded document shall be forwarded to the Planning Department. 9. Compliance with Other Rules and Conditions. The applicant shall comply with all other applicable rules,regulations and requirements.Other applicable conditions set forth under the "Approved Exceptions" section of this letter as well as the requirements of the affected agencies as contained in the"Agencies' Review"section are incorporated herein as conditions of approval. The applicant shall also comply with the requirements of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09-07, (REZ 07-000075), State Land Use Boundary Amendment Ordinance No. 09-08 (SLU 07-000018) and Special Management Area Use Permit(SMA 07-000024). 10. Mail Kiosk. The Mail Kiosk shall be located off of the new access road from A1i`i Drive Michael J.Riehm,AIA Riehm Owenby Planners Architects Page 26 Februaaty 25,2016 and shall not be placed within any county right-of-way to be conveyed to the County of Hawaii. 11. Annual Report. An annual progress report shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the anniversary date of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) permit. The report shall include,but not limited to, the status of the development and to what extent the conditions of approval are being complied with and/or the planning Director acknowledges that further reports are not required. 12. Time Extension. Pursuant to Section 25-2-7 of the Zoning Code, and in accordance with the terms and approvals granted by this PUD approval, compliance with the conditions of this PUD shall commence within two (2) years from the date of this approval. If the applicant should require an extension of time, the applicant may request a time extension pursuant to Section 25-6-14(Time extensions and amendments). Should any of the conditions fail to be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion,the Director shall initiate the nullification of the Planned Unit Development approval. Sincerely. J DUANE KANUHA Planning Director LHN/SG:nci PAAdmin Permits DivisionTUD Feamits12Ot51PUD-15-000032 La'ipala MakaAAPVL.docx Enols: Exhibits xc: Department of Public Works,Engineering(Hilo and Kona) Department of Public Works,Building Division Department of Water Supply Department of Environmental Management Hawaii Fire Department West Hawaii Planning Office H Kim +sr off, �T5' �¢''.•- �. Michael Yee Mayor Director Roy Takemoto April Surprenant Managing Director �.; • , Acting Deputy Director West Hawaii Office East Hawaii Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Kailua-Kana,Hawaii 96740 County of Hawai`i Hilo,Hawaii'i 96720 Phone(80 8)323-4770 Phone(808)961-8288 Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)961-8742 August 13, 2020 Daryn Arai Land Use Planning Consultant P.O. Box 4501 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Mr. Arai: SUBJECT: Application: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD-15-000032) Applicant: RIEHM OWENSBY PLANNERS ARCHITECTS Agent: RIEHM OWENSBY PLANNERS ARCHITECTS Owner: HAWAII ONE1 INVESTORS, LLC Request: PUD: LA11PALA MAKAI Tax Map Kc 3 7-7-008:121 This is in response to your request letter dated lune 19, 2020, We apologize for the length of time it has taken to respond to your request. In response, we offer the following: We acknowledge that the developer is in compliance with approved PUD-15-000032. That being said, the project is required to comply with all conditions of other land use approvals and permits, including obtaining any time extensions necessary to complete the project. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Hans Santiago of this department at hans.santiago@,hawaiicounty.gov. Sincerely, MICHAEL Planning Director HS:jaa I1ccM31planninglpubli6Admin Permits DivisionTUD Permits120151PUD-15-0000321-aipalaTUD-15-032 response COR-20- 133879.doex xc: Michael Riehm, Riehm Owensby Planners Architects SLU-07-400018; REZ-07-000475; SMA-07-000024 www, lannin .hawaiicoun ov Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer WanningAhawaiicouno,, ov EXHIBIT H H Kim ��� �F'"•'!k, Harry gyp.` Michael Yee Mayor Director Daryn Arai M o •� Deputy Director 1f,T` ;F West West Hawaii Office East Hawaii Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 County of Hawaii Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)323-4770 Phone(808)961-8288 Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)961-8742 September 19, 2017 Chrystal Thomas Yamasaki, LPLS Wes Thomas Associates 75-5749 Kalawa Street, Suite 201 Kailua-Kona, HI 96740-1818 Dear Ms.Yamasaki: TENTATIVE APPROVAL SUBDIVIDER: HAWAII ONE1 INVESTORS,LLC "La'ipala Makai PUD,Phase 1" (PUD-15-000032) Proposed Subdivision of Lot 3-13, Being a Portion of Grant 3019, Into Lots 1-23, Inclusive &Lots R-1 to R-4, Inclusive (Road Lots), Kapalaalaea 2nd, North Kona, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii TMK: 7-7-008:121 (SUB-17-001732) Please be informed that Tentative Approval of the revised preliminary plat map dated June 22, 2017,is hereby granted with modifications and conditions. This application is being processed pursuant to approved Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09 008 (REZ-07-000075), Planned Unit Development Permit No. PUD-15-000032 and Special Management Area Major Use Permit No. SMA-07-000024. The subdivider is reminded that compliance with the conditions of those approvals is required. The subdivider is now authorized to prepare detailed drawings of the subdivision plan in accordance with Chapter 23, Subdivision Control Code, County of Hawai'i, as modified. Before final approval can be granted,the following conditions must be met: 1) Archaeological/Cultural/Historic Resources. a) Complete all the remaining archaeological plans and shall comply with all the requirements and preservation measures recommended and approved by the Department of Land and Natural Resources' Historic Preservation Division (DLNR- SHPD). The subdividers shall also follow all applicable laws,rules and regulations should any archeological features or remains are found during site work or construction. www.cohplanningdeot.com Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer planning@hawaiicounty.gov EXHIBIT I Chrystal Thomas Yamasaki, LPLS Wes Thomas Associates Page 2 September 19, 2017 2) Water System a) Provide a water system meeting with the approval of the Department of Water Supply (DWS). b) Submit water system construction plans for approval by affected agencies. c) Pay installation and facilities charges as required by the DWS. 3) Drainage. a) Identify any watercourses or drainage ways and encumber with drainage easements. b) Additional storm runoff due to development shall be disposed within the subdivision and shall not be discharged onto adjacent properties or roadways. For planned drywells, satisfy Department of Health (DOH) drywell requirements, including issuance of an underground injection control (UIC) permit to the subdivider. c) Obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit or letter of determination from the DOH. 4) Access and Roadway Improvements a) All roadways shall be constructed substantially as presented and approved in PUD-15-000032 and as conditioned in Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09 008 (REZ-07-000075) as follows: i) Provide concrete curbs,gutters, sidewalks,and appropriate drywells for drainage control from the proposed development along the mauka side of Naniloa Street to Queen Kalama Street and then from Naniloa Street along the south side of Queen Kalama Street to Alii Drive. These improvements shall include any necessary pavement widening retaining structures, streetlights, traffic control devices, and, drainage improvements, and relocation of utilities meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works. b) For Road Lot R-1, construct 20 foot wide dedicable pavement with concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks within a minimum 50-ft.wide right-of-way conforming to Department of Public Works (DPW) Standard Detail (Std. Det.) R-33. Where grades are 8% or greater,the roadway section shall be paved per DPW Std. Det. R-34. c) All dedicable roadways within the proposed development shall follow the guidelines incorporated in the AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. d) For private Road Lots R-2, R-3 and R-4, construct paved access as detailed in the approved PUD with curbs and gutters and/or rolled curbs as may be required by the civil engineer of this project. e) Submit proposed street names conforming to the adopted street naming policy of the County of Hawaii. f) Install streetlights and traffic control devices as required by the Traffic Division, DPW. g) Submit construction plans and drainage report for review and comment. Chrystal Thomas Yamasaki, LPLS Wes Thomas Associates Page 3 September 19, 2017 5) All easements affecting proposed lots shall be identified for its purpose and to which proposed lot(s) and/or grantee(s) the easement is in favor of. This shall be shown on the final plat map. This will include,but not be limited to, any easement(s) for any archaeological feature buffers and any required for USPS mail delivery equipment. 6) Wastewater Improvements. All wastewater shall be disposed into the Kealakehe Sewage Treatment Plant in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Department of Environmental Management(DEM). 7) Property Tax Certification. Submit written proof that all taxes and assessments on the property are paid to date. 8) Surveyor's Certification. Place property markers in accordance with the final plat map. Surveyor shall submit certification upon completion. 9) Final Plat Map. Submit ten (10) copies of the final plat map prepared in conformity with Chapter 23, Subdivisions,within one year from the date of tentative approval, on or before September 19, 2018. If not,tentative approval to the revised preliminary plat map shall be deemed null and void. Only upon written request from the subdivider and for good cause,the director may grant to the subdivider an extension of time within which the subdivider may file the final plat. As part of final plat map submittal, provide an additional copy of the final plat map as a".dwg" or".dxf' diskette file prepared by CAD software. In the alternate,a digital copy of the final plat map may be e-mailed to the Tax Maps and Records Supervisor at lap nning@hawaiicounty.gov. 10) Time Limit. Subdivider shall complete all requirements specified as conditions for tentative approval of the revised preliminary plat map within three (3) years of said tentative approval, on or before September 19, 2020. An extension of not more than two (2) years may be granted by the director upon timely request of the subdivider. Please be aware that if at any time during the fulfillment of the foregoing conditions, should concerns emerge such as environmental problems or other problems which were earlier overlooked or not anticipated/accounted for in data/reports available to date,this could be sufficient cause to immediately cease and desist from further activities on the proposed subdivision, pending resolution of the problems. The Planning Director shall confer with the listed officers to resolve the problems and notify you accordingly. No final approval for recordation shall be granted until all the above conditions have been met. Chrystal Thomas Yamasaki, LPLS Wes Thomas Associates Page 4 September 19, 2017 Land shall not be offered for sale,lease or rent until final approval for recordation of the subdivision is granted by the Planning Director or the proposed subdivision has been issued a preliminary order of registration by the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (DCCA) in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 484, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS). Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact Jonathan Holmes of this department. Sincerely, EL YEE ning Director JRH:Inm \\C0H33\p1anning\pub1ic\Admin Permits Division\Subdivision\2017\2017-3\SUB-17-001732Hawaii0nelInvestorsTA 09-19-17.doc Enc.: Revised PPM (06-22-17) xc: Manager, DWS Director, DPW District Environmental Health Program Chief, DOH Planning Department-Kona DPW-ENG-KONA DLNR-HPD Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC REZ-07-000075 (Ord 09 008); SMA-07-000024; PUD-15-000032 Harry Kim Y'o`" , Michael Yee y' Mayor Director Daryn Arai Y■w;;ti Deputy Director West Hawaii Office East Hawaii Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy101 Pauahi Street,suite 3 Kai lua-Kona;Hawaii 96740 County of Hawaii Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)323-4770 Phone(808)961-8288 Fax(808}327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)961-8742 October 25, 2018 Chrystal Thomas Yamasaki, LPLS Wes Thomas Associates 75-5749 Kalawa Street,Suite 201 Kailua-Kona, HI 96740-1818 Dear Ms.Yamasaki: 2ND REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT MAP AND AMEND TENTATIVE APPROVAL SUBDIVIDER: HAWAII ONE1 INVESTORS, LLC "La'ipala Makai PUD,Phase 1" [PUD-15-000032] Proposed Subdivision of Lot 3-13, Being a Portion of Grant 3019, Into Lots 1-23, Inclusive&Lots R-1 to R-4, Inclusive (Road Lots), And Access and Utility Easement AU-1, Kapalaalaea 2nd, North Kona, Island of Hawaii, Hawai'i TMK: 7-7-008:121 SUB-17-001732 This second revised preliminary plat map adds Access and Utility Easement AU-1 to accommodate Access Alternate 1 of Condition H of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09 008 [REZ-07-400075] This application is being processed pursuant to approved Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09 008 (REZ-07-000075), Planned Unit Development Permit No. PUD-15-000032 and Special Management Area Major Use Permit No. SMA-07-000024. The subdivider is reminded that compliance with the conditions of those approvals is required. Please be informed that Amended Tentative Approval of the second revised preliminary plat map dated February 7, 2018. This amends Condition 4) a) by adding Sub-condition ii). www.hiplanniny-dgg.com Hawaii County is an Equal OpporAoto ProvWer and Employsr planning�hawaiieounty av EXHIBIT J Chrystal Thomas Yamasaki, LPLS Wes Thomas Associates Page 2 October 25, 2018 4) Access and Roadway Improvements a) All roadways shall be constructed substantially as presented and approved in PUD-15-000032 and as conditioned in Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09 008 (REZ-07-000075) as follows: i) Provide concrete curbs,gutters,sidewalks,and appropriate drywells for drainage control from the proposed development along the mauka side of Naniloa Street to Queen Kalarna Street and then from Naniloa Street along the south side of Queen Kalama Street to Ali'i Drive. These improvements shall include any necessary pavement widening retaining structures, streetlights, traffic control devices,and, drainage improvements, and relocation of utilities meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works; or ii) icor Access and Utility Easement AU-1,construct minimum 20 foot wide dedicable pavement with concrete curbs,gutters and sidewalks within a minimum 50-ft.wide right-of-way conforming to Department of Public Works (DPW) Standard Detail (Std. Det.) R-33. Where grades are S% or greater,the roadway section shall be paved per DPW Std. Det. R-34. All other conditions of TA dated September 19, 2017, remain in full force and effect. Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact Hans Santiago or Jonathan Holmes of this department. Sincerely, MICHAEL YEE Planning Director JRH/HS:tb \\cnh33\planningNpuhlic\Admirn Permits❑1v1sion\S1Ahd1v1s1oii\2018\2018.4\5U8-17-00173MiwailOnellnvestors 2ndREVPPM&AmcndTA 10-25- 18.docx Enc.: Second Revised PPM (02-08-18) Chrystal Thomas Yamasaki, LPLS Wes Thomas Associates Page 3 October 25, 2018 xc: Manager, DWS w/2nd REVPPM Director, DPW w/2nd REVPPM District Environmental Health Program Chief, DOH w/2nd REVPPM Planning Department-Kona w/2nd REVPPM DPW-ENO-KONA w/2"d REVPPM DLNR-HPD w/2nd REVPPM Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC REZ-07-000075 (Ord 09 008); SMA-07-000024; PUD-15-000032 V 00 Harry Kinn ?' = '" Michael Yee Mayor = Director Daryn Arai Deputy Director ••�oi'M►'wr West Hawaii Office East Hawaii office 74-5944 Ane Keohokalole Hwy • • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96744 County of Hawaii Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)3234779 Phone(809)963-8288 Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)961-9742 September 17, 2018 Kerr Van Bergen Trask Commercial Realty, LLC ~•i-i7.x}..11 i"7'UiTiliTl'1�1'izi ISt3itil Kailua Kona Hl 96740 Dear Mr.Van Bergen: GRANT TIME EXTENSION SUBDIVIDER: HAWAII ONE1 INVESTORS, LLC "La`ipala Makai PUD,Phase 1" (PtID-15-000032) Proposed Subdivision of Lot 3-B, Being a Portion of Grant 3019, Into Lots 1-23, Inclusive&Lots R-1 to R-4, Inclusive (Road Lots), Kapalaalaea 2"d, North Kona, Island of Hawai'i, Hawai'i TM K: 7-7- :1 1 SUB-17-00173 This responds to your letter of August 27, 2018. Please be informed that an extension of time of one (1)year until September 19,2019,for submission of the final plat map pursuant to Condition No. 9 of the letter of Tentative Approval dated September 19,2017, is hereby granted. Please be advised that Ordinance No.92-138, adopted by the County Council on December 4, 1992, amended Chapter 23 of the Hawaii County Subdivision Control Code, reads in part,as follows: "The subdivider shall complete all requirements specified as conditions for approval of the preliminary plat(tentative approval) within three years of said approval. An extension of not more than two (2) years may be granted by the director upon timely written request by the subdivider." wwvr.hiplanningdeot.com Hawai'i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer planning[u'hawaiiwunsygnv EXHIBIT K Kerr Van Bergen Trask Commercial Realty, LLC Page 2 September 17, 2018 The ordinance also makes provisions for those pending subdivision applications which were granted tentative approval prior to the adoption of said ordinance,as follows: "This subsection shall be applied to all subdivision applications which have received tentative subdivision approval and which have not completed subdivision improvements,provided the three year period,and extension, if applicable,shall be taken from December 4, 1992 and not From the date of preliminary plat (tentative) approval » Therefore,all conditions of the Tentative Approval dated September 19,2017, must be complied with by September 19,2020. An extension of not more than two (2) years may be granted by the director upon timely written request by the subdivider. Should the conditions of tentative approval not be completed within the time limit,the approval of the preliminary plat shall expire and shall be of no further force or effect,or shall be subject to the technical review of the applicable agencies for compliance with current code and rule requirements. Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact Jonathan Holmes of this department. Sincerely, X' Za �MICHA L YEE Planning Director )RH:tb Z\col}33Nplanning\public\Admin Permits DivisionNSubdivision\20113 2010.3NSUB-17-001732Hawaii0ne11nvestorsGr'rE 09-17- 18.dou xc: Manager, DWS Director, DPW District Environmental Health Program Chief, DDH Planning Department-Kona DPW-ENG-KONA Chrystal Thomas Yamasaki, LPLS,Wes Thomas Associates REZ-07-000075 (Ord 09 008); SMA-07-000024; PUD-15-000032 Y W Harry Kim ��'"••.•,� Michael Yee Mayor Ids Director Wil Qkabe Duane Kanuha Managing Director Deputy,Director West Hawaii Office East Hawai'i Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Kailua-Kona.Hawai'i 96740 County of Hawaii Hila,Hawai'i 96720 Phone(808)323-4770 Phone(808)961.8288 Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)%1-8742 February 13, 2013 Chrystal Thomas Yamasaki, LPLS Wes Thomas Associates 75-5749 Kalawa Street,Suite 201 Kailua-Kona,HI 96740-1818 Dear Ms.Yamasaki: APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION PLAN TITLE SHEET SUBDIVIDER: HAWAII ONE1 INVESTORS,LLC "La`ipala Makai PUD,Phase 1" (PUD-15-000032) Proposed Subdivision of Lot 3-13, Being a Portion of Grant 3019, Into Lots 1-23, Inclusive&Lots R-1 to R-4, Inclusive [Road Lots], Kapalaalaea 2nd, North Kona, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii T K: 7-7-008:001 & 121 (SUB-17-001732) We have reviewed the subject tracing of the construction plan and found that it has met our approval. Accordingly, we have certified the title sheet and have enclosed it with this letter. Please submit appropriate sets of prints of the aforesaid tracing together with specifications to the listed officers for reference and hies. Further action on the subject subdivision request shall be taken when the subdividers meet the remaining conditions of tentative approval and complete all improvements in accordance with the approved construction plans. In lieu of actually completing the improvements to secure final subdivision approval, the subdividers may file with our department a 100% surety bond and agreement to ensure completion of all subdivision improvements. www.hit lanningdeErt.cnm Hawaii Counry is an Equal Dpporrunirp Provider and Employer tannin hawaiieouaiv.gov EXHIBIT L Chrystal Thomas Yamasaki, LPLS Wes Thomas Associates Page 2 February 13, 2019 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Norren Kato of this department. Sincerely, MICHAEL YEE Planning Director NK:tb 11coh331p1anninglpub1ic\Admin Permits Divislon1Subdivision\201912019-11SUB-17-001732 Hawaii One CPA 02-13-19.docx Enc.: Title Sheet xc: Manager, DWS Director, DPW District Environmental Health Program Chief, DDH Planning Department-Kona DPW-ENG-KONA DLNR-HPD Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC REZ-07-000075 [Ord 09 008]; SMA-07-000024; PUD-15-000032 805 988 4114 ALDER 5 G A T E mazs6 sera ttPaldersrtatehome.tQm ' N `' ` : ` `+ � N 300 E.Esplanade Dr.Suite 1550 Oxnard,CA.93036 TO: DWS County Department of Water Supply FROM: Matt Mansi(Aldersgate Investment) RE:Water Commitment Time Extension "La'ipala Makai Development" Change of Zone Application No. REZ-07-000075 Tax Map Key 7-7-008:121 (SUB-17-001732) DATE: 1/4/21 To whom it may concern, Enclosed is the water commitment extension payment for lune 2021, as well as June 2022 totaling$14,700 ($7,250 each). last year's payment was tardy due to the project's uncertainty with COVID protocols and issues. If you have any questions,please call or email the at 805-216-5279,matt@ aldersgatehome.com Sincerely, WELLS FARGO BANK,H.A. 7017 ALaERSGATE INVESTMENT,LLC 300 E ESPLANAOE OR STE 1,%Q 16-2N+ DATE MNARO•CA SX36 Jen 5,2022 805 088.4514 AMOUNT 614,700.00 Fourteen Thousand Seven Hundred and 001100 Dollars PAY TO THE ORDER Matt Mansi OP County 0epartrnentofWater Supply 345 Kekuanaoa Street r Chief Operating Officer 1-1110, 1 96720 Memo: ---- - .+++:r�ve:•::ar.+,u+� ` Aldersgate 805-988-4114 niatt@aIdersgatehon)e.com EXHIBIT M Laipala Makakai PUD TM K (3) 7-7-08:121 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Kahaluu-Keauhou, Island of Hawaii October 2021 Prepared for Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC Prepared by F=M N T E R N A T I O N A L EXHIBIT N Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Table of Contents I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION..........................................................................................................................1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS..........................................................................................................................4 A. Geometric Configuration ..................................................................................................................4 B. Study Intersections...........................................................................................................................4 1. Alii Drive at Laaloa Avenue...........................................................................................................4 2. Route 11 at Laaloa Avenue...........................................................................................................7 3. Queen Kalama Avenue at Naniloa Drive.......................................................................................7 4. Alii Drive at Queen Kalama Avenue..............................................................................................7 C. Vehicle Volumes................................................................................................................................7 1. 24-Hour Volume............................................................................................................................7 2. Intersection Peak Turning Movement Counts..............................................................................9 3. Transit Facilities ............................................................................................................................9 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes...................................................................................................9 D. Existing Level of Service..................................................................................................................11 1. Methodology...............................................................................................................................11 2. Existing Intersections LOS Results...............................................................................................12 3. Mitigation....................................................................................................................................13 III. FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS..........................................................................................14 A. Upcoming Planned Projects............................................................................................................14 1. STIP..............................................................................................................................................14 2. O EQC...........................................................................................................................................14 3. Widening of Route 11 from Henry Street to Kamehameha III Road ..........................................15 4. Lako Street Extension..................................................................................................................15 5. Alii Highway.................................................................................................................................15 6. 201H Development.....................................................................................................................15 B. Volumes..........................................................................................................................................18 1. Background Growth....................................................................................................................18 C. Future Without Project Level of Service.........................................................................................22 1. Future (2026)Without Project Conditions .................................................................................22 2. Future (2031)Without Project Conditions .................................................................................22 3. Future (2041)Without Project Conditions .................................................................................23 i Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International 4. Mitigation Future (2041)Without Project at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue...............................24 5. Mitigation Future (2041)Without Project at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue...............................27 IV. FUTURE WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS.................................................................................................28 A. Future With Project Generated Volumes .......................................................................................28 1. Project Related Volumes.............................................................................................................28 B. Future With Project Level of Service...............................................................................................34 1. Future (2026)With Project Conditions.......................................................................................34 2. Future (2031)With Project Conditions.......................................................................................35 3. Future (2041)With Project Conditions.......................................................................................36 4. Mitigation Future (2041)With Project at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue ....................................37 V. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................38 VI. REFERENCES........................................................................................................................................39 List of Appendices AppendixA—Traffic Count Data Appendix B—Bus Routes and Maps Appendix C—Analysis Report Existing Conditions Appendix D—Analysis Report Future Without Project Conditions Appendix E—Analysis Report Future With Project Conditions ii Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International List of Figures Figure 1: Project Location Map.....................................................................................................................2 Figure2: Project Site Plan.............................................................................................................................3 Figure 3: Existing Lane Configuration ...........................................................................................................5 Figure 4: Existing Multimodal Facilities ........................................................................................................6 Figure 5: 24-Hour Volume Distribution on Alii Drive between Laaloa Ave and Queen Kalama Ave............8 Figure 6: 2021 Peak Hour Volumes.............................................................................................................10 Figure 7: KCDP Future Multimodal Transportation Network—Nani-Kailua Area.......................................16 Figure 8: KCDP Future Multimodal Transportation Network—Kahaluu Area............................................17 Figure 9: Future (2026)Without Project Peak Hour Volumes....................................................................19 Figure 10: Future (2031)Without Project Peak Hour Volumes..................................................................20 Figure 11: Future (2041)Without Project Peak Hour Volumes..................................................................21 Figure 12: Future (2041)Without Project 8-Hour Warrant Volume Thresholds........................................25 Figure 13: Future (2041)Without Project 4-Hour Warrant........................................................................26 Figure 14: Laipala Makai PUD Project Related Trips...................................................................................29 Figure 15: Future (2026)With Project Peak Hour Volumes .......................................................................31 Figure 16: Future (2031)With Project Peak Hour Volumes .......................................................................32 Figure 17: Future (2041)With Project Peak Hour Volumes .......................................................................33 List of Tables Table 1: 24-Hour Volume on Alii Drive between Laaloa Avenue and Queen Kalama Avenue.....................7 Table 2: 24-Hour Volume on Route 11 between Lako Street and Nalani Street..........................................8 Table 3: Peak Hour Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes....................................................................................9 Table 4: LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections...................................................................................11 Table 5: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections.......................................................................................11 Table 6: Existing (2021) LOS........................................................................................................................12 Table 7:Traffic Forecast—Daily Vehicle Trips in North Kona.....................................................................18 Table 8: Future (2026)Without Project LOS...............................................................................................22 Table 9: Future (2031)Without Project LOS...............................................................................................23 Table 10: Future (2041)Without Project LOS.............................................................................................24 Table 11: Future (2041)Volumes at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue.............................................................25 Table 12: Future (2041)Volumes at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue.............................................................26 Table 13: Future (2041)Without Project LOS—Mitigation at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue.....................27 Table 14: Development Trip Generation Rates ..........................................................................................28 Table 15: Project Related Development Phasing and Trips Generated......................................................28 Table 16: Future (2026)With Project LOS..................................................................................................34 Table 17: Future (2031)With Project LOS..................................................................................................35 Table 18: Future (2041)With Project LOS..................................................................................................36 Table 19: Future (2041)Without Project LOS—Mitigation at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue.....................37 iii Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Hawaii One1 Investors LLC is planning to develop a residential subdivision on a vacant 11.054-acre lot (TMK (3) 7-7-08:121) in Kahaluu-Keauhou, on the Island of Hawaii. The project will include the development of 62 single-family residential units and include two roadway access points. One access is proposed off an extension of Naniloa Drive, which connects to Queen Kalama Avenue and Alii Drive.The other access is proposed via a makai (ocean side) easement through an adjacent vacant parcel that has plans for future development and will connect to Alii Drive. A project location map showing the project site and study intersections is shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the proposed site plan and roadway access points. The project proposes the following phased construction schedule: • Phase 1 to be completed in 2023 (19 of 62 units); • Phase 2 to be completed in 2024(19 of 62 units); and • Phase 3 to be completed in 2025 (24 of 62 units). This Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TZAR) is being prepared in support of the design and permitting documents required for the proposed development. The Hawaii County Code Chapter 25, Section 25-2- 46"Concurrency Requirements"indicates that traffic impacts of projects be identified and analyzed within a future 5-year(2026), 10-year(2031), and 20-year(2041)timeline from the existing/current year(2021). This includes anticipated traffic growth and trips resulting from surrounding area development. Future years will be evaluated with and without the forecasted impact of the Laipala Makai development. 1 + ►'z' ■ �i MIND � ssallf.•+�■a 1 ■ ��►`- � I�wC�C�i ~ Will- MMON ���� r���` ` ■ r 1/I ,� '�_=�:is�-��� ■i i I TOO ms•.M•. ,■+i►1 ■��111111';;r �� :�:±��:�*�Ifs ■ � �'■■ �'res-��'�s.'ss ► ' ' t 1 $��r'11►11 �:�N►J -:� �I1►111 `�11 r r r IU 1�1 r 2 ■ �I A,'M moi■ ri • P r M � /r�*'1�ii � err y*j 'r►►� 3 y. I eR� k i all Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International n . 7 4 R K C.r. _ _� 'fit.--G.• r� r,..gtrC`CA 911 a 16. i.S-•'• -.__.._...� = .fit`-'�_�% �� 5 } s is t i;�G7 JFJ r,' I Figure 2: Project Site Plan 3 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed development is located in the North Kona District of Hawaii,just mauka (mountain side)of Alii Drive. Located to the north of the project is residential housing while a few commercial and residential properties exist to the south.The proposed project site is currently undeveloped. A. Geometric Configuration Alii Drive is a County-owned, two-lane roadway extending seven miles from Palani Road in the north to Alii Highway, near Keauhou Shopping Center, in the south. Varying width shoulder bikeways exist along the entirety of the corridor. Paved sidewalks exist in locations north of Kahakai Road and in the vicinity of the intersection with Alii Highway. There are no signed/marked bike lanes along Alii Drive. The posted speed limit is 30 MPH in the study area. Route 11 is a State-owned, two-lane, two-way roadway in the study area. There are paved shoulders of various widths with no designated sidewalks or bike lanes.The posted speed limit is 45 MPH in the study area. Route 11 goes by the various names of Queen Kaahumanu Highway, Kuakini Highway, Mamalahoa Highway, and Hawaii Belt Road. To avoid confusion, the name Route 11 will be used throughout this report. Queen Kalama Avenue is a County-owned, two-lane roadway extending from Alii Drive in the west and ending in a cul-de-sac in the east. Queen Kalama Avenue is lined with single-family homes with no designated sidewalks or bike lanes along the road.The posted speed limit is 25 MPH. Naniloa Drive is a County-owned,two-lane corridor located parallel and mauka of Alii Drive. Naniloa Drive begins at Laaloa Avenue in the north and extends south, past Queen Kalama Avenue. There are no sidewalks, shoulders, or bike lanes along Naniloa Drive. The posted speed limit is 25 MPH. Naniloa Drive is proposed to provide access to this development. Laaloa Avenue is a County-owned, two-lane, undivided roadway providing mauka to makai connectivity between Alii Drive and Route 11. Paved sidewalks and striped bike lanes are provided along Laaloa Avenue.The posted speed limit is 25 MPH. Laaloa Avenue provides the only access to Route 11 in a 3-mile stretch from Royal Poinciana Drive to Kamehameha III Road. B. Study Intersections Four existing study intersections were analyzed.The existing lane configurations are shown in Figure 3 and the existing surrounding area multimodal facilities are shown in Figure 4. 1. Alii Drive at Laaloa Avenue The Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue four-leg intersection is all-way stop-controlled (AWSC). It has a shared through-right and a shared left-through lane in the northbound and southbound approaches,respectively. The westbound Laaloa Avenue approach has dedicated left and right turn lanes. There are marked crosswalks, curb ramps, and sidewalks provided at this intersection. 4 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Alii Dr Route 11 2 1 u La'aIoa Ave S t0 p 0 '! Queen 4 _ Ka I a m a Ave Project Route 11 Location Alii Dr Proposed Ali'i �a mghWay extension — ��4 ni 5r v 4 a• � � 11 N ueen Kalama Ave �- Not to Scale � L i Leclend Analvzed Signalized Unsignalized I Stop Sign Intersection Intersection Ful Intersection Figure 3: Existing Lane Configuration 5 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International 1 Proposed Alii 1 Highway extension - _A Q La-aloa Av L ,ZT� P CL � r `` Queen Kalama AVe 1 _ • Project Location Tl 1 1 - r _ r 1 49 1 ~ akol Not to Scale , Legend Existing Sidewalks Existing Bike Lane ——- Hele-On 111111111111 Existing Bike Route Bus Route Existing Pedestrian Crossing 9 ASignalized Intersection Walua Road Bike and Pedestrian Scenic Route Figure 4: Existing Multimodal Facilities 6 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International 2. Route 11 at Laaloa Avenue Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue is a three-leg signalized intersection. Dedicated turn lanes are provided for each approach. The northbound left turn traffic signal control is protected/permitted. Channelized right turn islands are provided. Marked crosswalks,curb ramps,and sidewalks are provided at this intersection. 3. Queen Kalama Avenue at Naniloa Drive The Naniloa Drive and Queen Kalama Avenue four-leg intersection is two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) with stop signs on Naniloa Street. All approaches have a shared left-through-right lane. There are no marked crosswalks, curb ramps, or sidewalks provided at the intersection. 4. Alii Drive at Queen Kalama Avenue The Alii Drive and Queen Kalama Avenue three-leg intersection is stop-controlled for the Queen Kalama Avenue approach. This intersection has a shared through-right and a shared left-through lane in the northbound and southbound approaches, respectively.The westbound Queen Kalama Avenue approach is a shared left-right turn lane.There are no marked crosswalks, curb ramps, or sidewalks provided at this intersection. C. Vehicle Volumes 1. 24-Hour Volume Historic Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts in the study area on Alii Drive between Laaloa Avenue and Queen Kalama Avenue were available from 2013-2020. 24-hour tube counts were also collected on Thursday,August 19, 2021 at the same location.The historical HDOT and recent 2021 counts are shown in Table 1. The annual growth rate along Alii Drive between 2013 and 2021 was found to be 4.56%. However,this is largely due to the increase in traffic between 2016 and 2017.Volumes from 2013- 2016 and 2017-2021 increased at rates of 2.66% and 1.68%, respectively, which are more in line with anticipated growth.Year 2020 data was not used due to the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic which are discussed in a later section. Appendix A includes the historical HDOT traffic data and the 2021 24-hour hour counts. Table 1:24-Hour Volume on Alii Drive between Laaloa Avenue and Queen Kalama Avenue ADT or 24-hour Year Average 2013 6,100 2014 6,300 2015 5,500 2016 6,600 2017 8,151 2018 n/a 2019 9,353 2020 8,387 2021 8,712 7 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International HDOT counts were also available in the vicinity of the project along Kuakini Highway(Route 11) between Lako Street and Nalani Avenue from 2014-2020 (see Table 2). The annual growth rate along Route 11 between 2014 and 2019 was 1.75%which is in line with the 2017-2021 growth rate along Alii Drive.Similar to Alii Drive, year 2020 data was not used due to the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic which will be discussed later in the report. Appendix A includes the historical HDOT traffic data. Table 2:24-Hour Volume on Route 11 between Lako Street and Nalani Street ADT or 24-hour Year Average 2014 22,900 2015 20,100 2016 21,500 2017 24,611 2018 n/a 2019 24,939 2020 19,938 The 2021 AM commuter peak and PM commuter peak hours along Alii Drive were found to occur between 7:15 AM — 8:15 AM and 3:15 PM — 4:15 PM, respectively. Figure 5 shows the daily 2017-2020 HDOT volumes and the 2021 24-hour volume on Alii Drive between Laaloa Avenue and Queen Kalama Avenue. —2017(H DOT) —2019(H DOT) 900 —2020(H DOT) —2021(SSFM) Boo 700 - - - — C 0 C 3 600 M Q 6 S 'n 500 N W 3 400 a 300 200 100 0 Rl W A c76s �1 Ca tp N W .P Cn OV W [O O > n a a n r n a n q O O O O > ? Figure 5: 24-Hour Volume Distribution on Alii Drive between Laaloa Ave and Queen Kalama Ave 8 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International a) Covid-19 Traffic Impacts The Covid-19 pandemic led to a 14-day quarantine of incoming travelers and the closure of non-essential businesses in the State of Hawaii beginning in March 2020. Towards the end of 2020, businesses began reopening, and non-essential employees began going back to work. Tourism slowly started to return as well. Beginning in the 2021 school year, Hawaii public schools reinstated in-person learning.As a result of this, and in comparing 2021 24-hour counts from along Alii Drive, 2021 peak hour counts are assumed to reflect typical traffic volumes on a school day. 2. Intersection Peak Turning Movement Counts Turning movement counts were taken at the four existing study intersections on Thursday, August 19, 2021 from 7:00-11:00 AM and 1:30-5:30 PM.The AM and PM commuter peak hours occurred between 7:15-8:15 AM and 3:15-4:15 PM, respectively. Figure 6 shows the AM and PM peak hour volumes at the study intersections. Appendix A includes traffic count data at the study intersections. 3. Transit Facilities The Hawaii County transit system (Hele-On Bus) has one bus route in the project area.The bus route#201 is called "Intra Kona". This route runs along Alii Drive, but the there are no designated stops close to the project site. The closest designated stops are 2.3 miles north near Royal Sea Cliff Kona by Outrigger and 1.4 miles south near Keauhou Shopping Center. Appendix B includes the detailed bus route schedule and map for this route. 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes Peak hour intersection pedestrian and bicycle volumes were taken at the existing study intersections on Thursday, August 19, 2021 from 7:00-11:00 AM and 1:30-5:30 PM.The pedestrian volumes are higher in the AM peak hour, especially at the Alii Drive intersections. Bicycle volumes are fairly consistent in the AM and PM peak hours, with higher volume bicycle traffic along Alii Drive. Table 3 shows a summary of the pedestrian and bicycle counts during the vehicular peak hours. Table 3: Peak Hour Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes Pedestrian Bicycle Intersection AM Peam PM Peak AM Peam PM Peak Alii Drive &Laaloa Avenue 39 8 19 12 Route 11& Laaloa Avenue 2 1 0 0 Alii Drive &Queen Kalama Avenue 39 2 17 11 Queen Kalama Avenue &Naniloa Drive 10 3 0 1 9 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Ali` Dr 2 Route 11 m _ `n Ln � M1 N V � 80(76) Ln 38(49) r q� I1J � CU 4 T < 107(81) J 23 (19) N o CO o L n w 0 Alii Dr Route 11 Alii Dr 4 Naniloa ❑r 00 m ko o o 1($} CD m o o t(1} } 12 19} CD E 4(7) rD :33 - ( } w U T Y u a) t1 3 I [ C 1(5} w � 4(15}�� > LD 7i CD C d d(�} o r r S'6 0 0 0 w v v ti v Alifi Dr Naniloa Dr Le seen d Peak Hour Volumes #(#) App(PM} S Signalized � Unsignalized (veh/hr) Intersection Intersection Stop Sign r +�— Proposed Alii Highway extension f ��olarli�� --- -- La'a loa Oe Oilig Not to scale Figure 6: 2021 Peak Hour Volumes 10 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International D. Existing Level of Service 1. Methodology Level of service (LOS) is a rating system used in traffic engineering to measure the effectiveness of roadway operating conditions. There are six LOS ranging from A to F. LOS A is defined as being the least interrupted flow conditions with little or no delays,whereas LOS F is defined as conditions where extreme delays exist. Guidelines state that LOS D or better is appropriate for the study intersections and movements. Intersection LOS and delay was determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro Version 10.0 traffic analysis software. As stated in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCMG) (TRB, 2016), LOS for an all-way stop controlled (AWSC) and a two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersection is determined by the measured control delay (see Table 4). Delay at an AWSC intersection is defined for the intersection as a whole and for each movement. Delay at a TWSC intersection is defined by each minor movement and not for the major movements or intersection as a whole.This is because vehicles traveling along the major,free-flow road, of a TWSC intersection, proceed through with minimal delay. Those vehicles approaching the intersection along the minor movement (side-street) are controlled by a stop sign and thus experience delay attributable to the volume of vehicles passing along the free-flow road and the gaps available. Table 4: LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Average Control Delay(s/veh) LOS by v/c Ratio <=1.0 >1.0 <_ 10.0 A F >10 and <_15 B F >15 and <_25 C F >25 and <_35 D F >35 and <_50 E F >50 F F Source: HCMG(TRB, 2016) The LOS analysis for signalized intersections is determined by average total vehicle delay based on the methodologies of the HCMG(TRB, 2016), shown in Table 5. High numbers of vehicles passing through the intersection, long cycle lengths, inappropriate signal phasing, or poor signal progression can result in long delays, and consequently poor LOS. Table 5: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections Average Control Delay(s/veh) LOS by v/c Ratio <=1.0 >1.0 <_ 10.0 A F >10 and <_20 B F >20 and <_35 C F >35 and <_55 D F >55 and <_80 E F >80 F F Source: HCMG(TRB, 2016) 11 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Another measure of intersection operation is the volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. This is the ratio of the volume of traffic utilizing the intersection compared to the maximum volume of vehicles that can be accommodated by the intersection during a specific period of time. A v/c ratio under 0.85 means the intersection is operating under capacity and excessive delays are not experienced. An intersection is operating near its capacity when v/c ratios range from 0.85 to 0.95. Unstable flows are expected when the v/c ratio is between 0.95 and 1.0. Any v/c ratio greater than or equal to 1.0 indicates that the intersection is operating at or above capacity which results in a LOS F per the HCM (TRB, 2016). A traffic movement can have a poor LOS but low v/c which suggests that the traffic volumes along that movement are low but have to wait a long time to make the movement. This is common for low volume protected turn movements or side streets that have to wait through a long cycle length for their phase to come up. 2. Existing Intersections LOS Results Existing intersection and movement LOS and delay (in seconds per vehicle) was determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software and the results are shown in Table 6. Table 6: Existing(2021) LOS AM Peak PM Peak Intersection and Movement Delay Delay v/c LOS v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 13.4 - B 14.1 - B Alii NBThrough-Right 15.1 0.62 C 13.5 0.54 B Alii SB Left-Through 12.6 0.49 B 15.9 0.63 C Queen Kalama WB Left 10.4 0.10 B 10.7 0.12 B Queen Kalama WB Right 9.6 0.17 A 9.6 0.15 A Route 11& Laaloa Avenue 19.5 - B 21.7 - C Route 11 NB Left 11.8 0.08 B 14.8 0.16 B Route 11NBThrough 12.4 0.66 B 15.9 0.81 B Route 11 SB Through 27.2 0.85 C 28.3 0.89 C Laaloa EB Left 20.0 0.29 C 24.4 0.25 C Alii Drive&Queen Kalama Avenue Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 0.0 0.00 A 8.10.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 15.6 0.06 C 13.8 0.06 B Queen Kalama Avenue& Naniloa Drive Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Queen Kalama EB approach 7.3 0.01 A 7.3 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 0.0 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 A Naniloa NB approach 8.8 0.01 A 0.0 0.00 A Naniloa SB approach 8.4 0.01 A 8.6 0.01 A a) Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue At Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue,the intersection and all movements operate at an LOS C or better during both peak hours. b) Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue At Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue,the intersection and all movements operate at an LOS C or better during both peak hours. 12 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International c) Alii Drive and Queen Kalama Avenue At Alii Drive and Queen Kalama Avenue, all movements operate at an LOS C or better during both peak hours. d) Queen Kalama Avenue and Naniloa Drive At Queen Kalama Avenue and Naniloa Drive, all movements operate at LOS A during both peak hours. 3. Mitigation Mitigation would be analyzed for intersections or movements that operate at LOS E or worse. All existing intersections and movements operate at acceptable LOS and delays and therefore no mitigation is needed for the existing conditions. 13 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International III. FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS Regional traffic growth and future surrounding area development's traffic were added to the roadway network and analyzed for Future Years in 2026, 2031, and 2041. A. Upcoming Planned Projects 1. STIP Research was completed on August 26, 2021 at the Statewide Transportation Improvements Program (STIP) FY 2019-2022 website. The STIP is a four-year forecast that identifies state and county transportation projects to be funded with Federal Highway and Federal Transit funds. There were no roadway construction or improvement projects listed in the STIP (2019-2022) that would impact the project area. 2. OEQC Research was completed on August 26,2021 at the State of Hawaii Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQC) website. The OEQC website provides Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Environmental Assessments (EA) available to the public. As of July 2021, the OEQC was renamed the Environmental Review Program (ERP), but the URL led to the old OEQC website. Projects from the OEQC website in the surrounding area from 2016-2021 were reviewed. a) Laaloa Avenue New Park Development TZAR(SSFM 2017) A TIAR was written for the 2018 Laaloa Avenue New Park Final EA.The proposed park is located north of Laaloa Avenue, next to the future Alii Highway extension. Construction of the new park is part of Hawaii One1's fair share agreement with Hawaii County. Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC is also planning to develop the vacant 8.175-acre lot makai of Laipala Makai PUD, referred to as the 201H development. The last phase of the 201H development is expected to be completed in 2027. The construction of the park is expected to be completed before Phase 1 of the 201H development is completed. Traffic volumes from Laaloa Avenue New Park Development TIAR were added to the background volumes. b) Pualani Mokoi TZAR(The Traffic Management Consultant,2019) The Pualanai Makai development is located makai of Route 11, across of Puapuaanui Street, over two miles north of the Laipala Makai project.This multi-use development consists of multi-family housing and various retail/commercial space. This traffic study did not include traffic volumes south of Lako Street. Traffic from this project will not impact the study intersections of this project and therefore was not added to the background volume.The residual traffic generated from this intersection is assumed to be included in the annual growth rate. The Pualani Makai project calls for more north-south regional traffic capacity through the widening of Route 11 or the construction of Alii Highway. C) Royal Vistas Housing Project TZAR(SSFM,2020) The Royal Vistas Housing Project is located mauka Route 11, between Puapuaanui Street and Lako Street, about two miles north of the Laipala Makai project. This development consists of residential housing. Traffic generated from this project extended to the Route 11 and Kamehameha III Road intersection. Volumes from this TIAR were added as a part of the background volume. In addition, the Royal Vistas Housing Project calls out for more north-south regional traffic capacity through the widening of Route 11. 14 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International 3. Widening of Route 11 from Henry Street to Kamehameha III Road The Federal-Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the District of Hawaii (July 2014) and the County of Hawaii General Plan (February 2005) includes improvements to Route 11 from Henry Street to Kamehameha III Road. It is proposed that Route 11 will be widened by two travel lanes and include bicycle facilities and sidewalks.This project will have a significant impact on traffic operations.There is currently no anticipated start/completion date for this project and therefore it was not included in the analysis of future conditions. The Laipala Makai project is expected to be completed before the widening of Route 11. 4. Lako Street Extension The most recent extension of Lako Street is proposed from the current terminus to a future roundabout at the intersection with Alii Drive. The proposed roadway connection is about 1.2 miles north of the project site. The Lako Street extension would provide another mauka-makai connector road between Laaloa Avenue and Royal Poinciana Drive.The County of Hawaii has had various plans for the Lako Street extension from 2000, with a Final Environmental Assessment(FEA) being completed in 2004.The County of Hawaii General Plan (February 2005) includes a recommendation of the extension of Lako Street to Alii Drive. Construction was planned in 2017 with an expected completion date in 2019, but construction for the project was not completed. There is currently no anticipated start/completion date for this project. The Laipala Makai project is expected to be completed before the construction of the Lako Street extension. S. Alii Highway The County of Hawaii General Plan (February 2005) includes a recommendation for the construction of Kahului-Keauhou Parkway (Alii Highway) from Queen Kaahumanu Highway to Keauhou. The official Transportation Network Maps forthe Nani Kailua Area (see Figure 7) and the Kahaluu Area (see Figure 8) from the Kona Community Development Plan (KCDP) (Wilson Okamoto, 2008) shows future Alii Highway extension running parallel to Route 11, connecting to Route 11 between Hualalai Road and Puapuaanui Street and extending through the project area to the Keauhou Shopping Center. The completion of this project would provide an alternative to Alii Drive and Route 11 in the north-south direction, passing around the northbound Lako Street bottleneck in the PM peak hour. Proposed pedestrian and bike paths are planned along the Alii Highway extension.There is currently no anticipated start/completion date for this project and therefore it was not included in the analysis of future conditions. 6. 201H Development Located just west of Laipala Makai, the 201H development will include 50 single family residential units. The site is currently vacant. The main access to the 201H development will be from Alii Drive, with a secondary access to Queen Kalama Avenue and Naniloa Drive through the Laipala Makai PUD.This project will be completed in three phases. Phase 1 and 2 will consist of 30 single family units and be completed in 2026. Phase 3 will see the completion of the remaining 20 units by 2027. Trips generated by this project were added to the background volumes. The expected traffic from the 201H development was determined using the following four-step methodology: trip generation, trip distribution, modal choice, and route assignment. Project related trips were distributed based on the 2021 turning movements at the study intersections. 15 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International - -tib r ,. + $Y µ ', 1 - r idol'.e _q A. ( 4 by s �' QyuNa ^.� '�'a IilN,LOOP yL � \ x ,,PW.51 rr��lST Logand y 1 propuzod Fwads,Clasj Mltatlndk Proposed Transit Line' f 1 ^ CDP,Lrxal --trunk —CDP,Ok Lcbr,m*F —tAcdndaey CDP,odiamr,minor ' transit Hui' LtkR13 ' - GP.arterlal . GP,cellacar,maj*er ®Transi[Station' I GP,collector.minor TOD Type a �° Pedeatrien Blkr Paths(CO ' TYPE O Nalghhxhaod 'P r„ s Regional CenterLone =Kona Man Af6a' Plath QRwal Tewn TOds- --Path•s —Esgsur4 Roadway —Ped•sw —P2d-fr811 � —Shaved k Shoulder Policy Layer 0 900 1.806 IC0v Feet 1 inch equals 2,000 feet Source: County of Hawaii s The County of Hawaii Planning) Department is the repository of the offlcW wrap, Source: Mapping Kona's Future, Kona Community Development Plan (COH, 2008) Figure 7: KCDP Future Multimodal Transportation Network—Nani-Kailua Area 16 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International YL 5 - Proposed Project Area h� '1 ! Ik LB�9Y3� 7 Proposed Roads.ClasaiGtaUon'Proposed Transit Line' r --CDP.Local --•Trunk —CDP,collector.maJor —Sewridary � E CDP,collector.minor Trarrsd Nub' f,. oLEA r I — ,sxallec�ar,major Trema![Slation' F GP.collecWF,,mirror SOD Type Pedeslden-Mke Paths(CDP)' Neighborhood rr. TYPE =Flegonal Censer Lane ED Kona Urban Ares F Path ©Rural Town TOOs - Path-s —Exlstlng Raadway —Ped-sw Pod-lrad i-., `•. . —Shared I - --Shoulder ` Policy Layer 0 000 1,800 3,600 Feet 1 inch equals 2,000 feet Source; County of Hawaii f The County of Hawaii Pianning Department is the repository of ; the official wrap. { � Source: Mapping Kona's Future, Kona Community Development Plan (COH, 2008) Figure 8: KCDP Future Multimodal Transportation Network—Kahaluu Area 17 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International B. Volumes 1. Background Growth The Federal-Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the District of Hawaii (CH2M Hill, 2014)forecasts a compounded annual increase of 1.48%in North Kona from 2020 to 2035 (see Table 7). Table 7:Traffic Forecast—Daily Vehicle Trips in North Kona Year Daily Vehicle Trips Growth Rate 2020 163,090 1.48% 2035 203,300 Source: Federal-Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the District of Hawaii(CH2M Hill, 2014) Historical traffic volumes along Alii Drive show a steady increase after 2016 with 2017-2021 (excluding year 2020) volumes showing an annual increase of 1.68% along Alii Drive between Laaloa Avenue and Queen Kalama Avenue. Similarly, the 2017-2019 volumes on Route 11 between Lako Street and Naniloa Street increased by 1.75% annually. These annual growth rates of 1.68% and 1.75% are in line with the 1.48%growth projections from the Long-Range Transportation Plan. Therefore, a 1.48% annual growth rate was applied to the through traffic along Alii Drive and Route 11 and added to the trips generated by the Laaloa Avenue Park, Royal Vistas, and 201H development. Other projects not identified in the STIP and OEQC are assumed to be included in the 1.48%annual growth rate. Figures 9 through 11 show the resulting Future Without Project volumes forecast for 2026, 2031, and 2041, respectively. 18 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Ali'i Dr Route 11 m � ❑,� ov ry 81(33} 1 39 i55} v Ln coo y v 1 U W 11b(93} U+ Z 25(23) ~ R w W A f W �O A AN Dr Route 11 Ali'i Dr Naniloa Dr j] +-4(7) T 12(S) 7 7K (�) 7[ U t � W � 4(15) J� m D o r D o(2) C W CD fi7 � �� o f4 W N 61 Ali'i Dr Naniloa Dr AIN Dr 0 N u AA. ��Proposed Alli m - iafA 51 Hyhwdy extension ry`l 6(4) _ N 4 ° 6 aloa Ave 3 { } _ U 4 : r$": m r � � „ 0 ween I(alama Ave Ali'i Dr Lenend #(#) Peak Hour Volumes Signalized ❑ Unsignalized Proposed AM (PM) S Intersection U Intersection Stop Sign = Driveway to (vehlhr) Project Site Figure 9: Future(2026)Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 19 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Ali'i Dr Route 11 Ln rLnv B1(33} 1 39(55; r v o O M1 y 41 U y v fi a 122 (96) LD 03 ° 25(2a) LO N" g IF AN Dr Route 11 Ali'i Dir f� Naniloa Dr Ln p 1 1} p o 1($} � m o (7} CD CD CD v y ED 03 CD CDCD Z - � o CO Ali'i Dr Naniloa Dr AN Dr A. ��rH 51 HgKwO extension 11(7) l.araloa Ave U 4 : T (-4 [6 4 1 O L W V CD w ±= een I(alama Ave Alii Dr Lenend #(#} Peak Hour Volumes Signalized ❑ Unsignalized Proposed AM (PM) S Intersection U Intersection Stop Sign = Driveway to (vehlhr) Project Site Figure 10: Future(2031)Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 20 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Ali'i Dr Route 11 V N Ln 1 39(55} v cc v rm v v + U y vrJ S t ti 172 (96) m 26(24) N � AN Dr Route 11 Ali'i Dr Naniloa Dr minC 0 u u 1 1} A Ln o 1($}CD M m o 4F-4(3) M v y U firms ED � 1( )� u � � cn COD 4( ) aD CD � o(�) o CD A " A 6 Ali'i Dr Naniloa Dr AIN Dr A. Hyhwdy extension m m ( } �• �. 7(5) Ld'aloa Ave s U 4 : T (-400 [6 4 1 to w y rn w ween I(alama Ave A � Ali'i Dr Lenend #(#} Peak Hour Volumes Signalized ❑ Unsignalized Proposed AM (PM) S Intersection U Intersection Stop Sign = Driveway to (vehlhr) Project Site Figure 11: Future(2041)Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 21 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International C. Future Without Project Level of Service 1. Future(2026)Without Project Conditions Future (2026) Without Project intersection and movement LOS and delay (in seconds per vehicle) were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software and are shown in Table 8. The cycle length and phasing at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue was optimized. The future intersection of Alii Drive and the proposed project driveway was analyzed as a two-way stop-controlled intersection with a shared left-right turn exit lane controlled by a stop sign. Table 8: Future(2026)Without Project LOS AM Peak PM Peak Intersection and Movement Delay Delay v/c LOS v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 15.0 - B 16.7 - C Alii NBThrough-Right 17.4 0.68 C 15.6 0.61 C Alii SB Left-Through 13.8 0.53 B 19.8 0.70 C Queen Kalama WB Left 10.7 0.10 B 11.2 0.14 B Queen Kalama WB Right 9.9 0.18 A 10.1 0.17 B Route 11& Laaloa Avenue 19.8 - B 24.1 - C Route 11 NB Left 12.6 0.09 B 17.0 0.20 B Route 11NBThrough 12.4 0.69 B 19.0 0.87 B Route 11 SB Through 26.9 0.86 C 29.9 0.91 C Laaloa EB Left 23.2 0.34 C 27.7 0.30 C Alii Drive&Queen Kalama Avenue Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 0.0 0.00 A 8.2 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 16.6 0.06 C 14.5 0.07 B Queen Kalama Avenue& Naniloa Drive Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Queen Kalama EB approach 7.3 0.01 A 7.3 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 0.0 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 A Naniloa NB approach 9.2 0.03 A 9.4 0.02 A Naniloa SB approach 8.9 0.02 A 9.4 0.06 A Alii Drive&Proposed Driveway Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 8.2 0.01 A 8.10.01 A Proposed Driveway WB exit 12.6 0.02 B 13.2 1 0.02 B All intersections and individual movements were found to operate at an acceptable LOS and therefore mitigation is not needed for the Future (2026)Without Project conditions. 2. Future(2031)Without Project Conditions Future (2031) Without Project intersection and movement LOS and delay (in seconds per vehicle) were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software and are shown in Table 9. The cycle length and phasing at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue was optimized. The future intersection of Alii Drive and the proposed project driveway was analyzed as a two-way stop-controlled intersection with a shared left-right turn exit lane controlled by a stop sign. 22 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Table 9: Future(2031)Without Project LOS AM Peak PM Peak Intersection and Movement Delay Delay v/c LOS v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 17.5 - C 19.2 - C Alii NBThrough-Right 21.4 0.75 C 17.7 0.66 C Alii SB Left-Through 15.1 0.58 B 23.2 0.76 C Queen Kalama WB Left 10.9 0.10 B 11.4 0.14 B Queen Kalama WB Right 10.2 0.18 B 10.3 0.18 B Route 11& Laaloa Avenue 20.5 - C 24.5 - C Route 11 NB Left 13.8 0.11 B 18.9 0.21 B Route 11NBThrough 12.7 0.72 B 21.1 0.90 C Route 11 SB Through 27.5 0.88 C 27.7 0.90 C Laaloa EB Left 26.5 0.39 C 33.7 0.35 C Alii Drive&Queen Kalama Avenue Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 0.0 0.00 A 8.3 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 17.9 0.07 C 15.5 0.08 C Queen Kalama Avenue& Naniloa Drive Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Queen Kalama EB approach 7.3 0.01 A 7.3 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 0.0 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 A Naniloa NB approach 9.3 0.04 A 9.5 0.04 A Naniloa SB approach 9.0 0.02 A 9.6 0.09 A Alii Drive&Proposed Driveway Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 8.3 0.01 A 8.3 0.01 A Proposed Driveway WB exit 13.2 0.04 B 14.0 1 0.03 B All intersections and individual movements were found to operate at an acceptable LOS and therefore mitigation is not needed for the Future (2031)Without Project conditions. 3. Future(2041)Without Project Conditions Future (2041) Without Project intersection and movement LOS and delay (in seconds per vehicle) were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software and are shown in Table 10. The cycle length and phasing at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue was optimized. The future intersection of Alii Drive and the proposed project driveway was analyzed as a two-way stop-controlled intersection with a shared left-right turn exit lane controlled by a stop sign. Movements that operate at LOS E or worse are highlighted in yellow. 23 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Table 10: Future(2041)Without Project LOS AM Peak PM Peak Intersection and Movement Delay Delay v/c LOS v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 24.6 - C 27.8 - D Alii NBThrough-Right 32.5 0.87 D 24.1 0.77 C Alii SB Left-Through 18.5 0.67 C 35.7 0.89 E Queen Kalama WB Left 11.3 0.11 B 11.9 0.15 B Queen Kalama WB Right 10.6 0.19 B 10.8 0.19 B Route 11& Laaloa Avenue 20.1 - C 37.1 - D Route 11 NB Left 15.9 0.12 B 29.3 0.29 C Route 11NBThrough 12.7 0.76 B 36.0 0.99 D Route 11 SB Through 25.0 0.87 C 38.4 0.98 D Laaloa EB Left 36.0 0.46 D 39.8 0.39 D Alii Drive&Queen Kalama Avenue Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 0.0 0.00 A 8.5 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 20.7 0.08 C 17.6 0.09 C Queen Kalama Avenue& Naniloa Drive Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Queen Kalama EB approach 7.3 0.01 A 7.3 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 0.0 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 A Naniloa NB approach 9.3 0.04 A 9.5 0.04 A Naniloa SB approach 9.0 0.02 A 9.6 0.09 A Alii Drive&Proposed Driveway Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 8.6 0.01 A 8.5 0.01 A Proposed Driveway WB exit 14.5 0.05 B 15.6 0.04 C The southbound approach at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue operates at LOS E (v/c of 0.89) during the PM peak hour. The LOS is a result of the increased traffic volume and the all-way stop-control. Various mitigation measures for the Future (2041)Without Project condition were analyzed. The v/c ratio for the northbound and southbound approaches at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue are 0.99 and 0.98, respectively. When the v/c ratio reaches 1.00,the movements will operate at LOS F.This is due to the traffic volume reaching the roadway capacity.Although the traffic analysis shows these movements operating at an acceptable LOS letter grade,this intersection should be monitored. 4. Mitigation Future(2041)Without Project at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue Traffic signal Warrant 1, 8-Hour Warrant, from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (FHWA, 2009),was analyzed for the Future (2041)Without Project conditions. For Warrant 1 to pass, one of the following combinations of conditions must occur: • If Condition A is satisfied then Condition B or a combination of Condition A/Condition B is not needed. • If Condition B is satisfied then Condition A or a combination of Condition A/Condition B is not needed. • If neither Condition A or Condition B is satisfied, then a combination of Condition A/Condition B should be checked. 24 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Figure 12 shows the volume thresholds to satisfy Condition A and Condition B for Warrant 1.The project is located in Kahaluu-Keauhou, a census-designated place (CDP) on Hawaii. According to the 2010 US Census,the population of Kahaluu-Keauhou was 3,459. For communities with lessthan 10,000 population, a 70%factor should be applied to volumes. Table 11 shows the calculations for the traffic volumes used for analysis.The major volume is a sum of the volumes on the Alii Drive approaches.The minor volume is the sum of the makai-bound Laaloa Avenue approach volumes.A 1.48%annual growth rate was added to the 2021 Alii Drive volumes as part of the 2021 major volume calculation.The Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue intersection did not pass Warrant 1 Condition A, but it did pass Warrant 1 Condition B. Therefore, this intersection passes the 8-Hour Warrant. Tolle 4C-1. Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Condltkon A—Minimum Vehicular Volurrre Number W.lane}for moving Vehicles pBr hour on mapor simMBhrcles par hour on h19her-volumo traf is on each approach Molal of bath appraachesi minor-mroei approach[cnr3 dirbotion only] Malar 61reet Mmor Sl eer 'W°6" 84°b° 7t7' Sfi° ° 1 W 80%" 70010` 56%4 1 1 504 404 384 294 150 124 105 B4 2 c-r more I 663 460 IL20 336 150 120 105 E14 2 Cd mora L'or more 50a 484 420 M 2.00 164 144 f 12 1 2 or more 5016 406 354 284 200 16D 140 1 112 Condition B—Intemption of Continuous Traffic Number of lanes for moving Vehicles per hour an maGar slreel Vehio'es PeF hour on F:3her-volume trallic on each approach tiiolal of bw.h approaches) minor-Vreel approach tone direction only) Major 9,rer,1 M.npr 1>1;Pel '(;l`h' $0 r.^ r[i 56-1 1 45r l44 " ?0%, 56'5' 1 1 75D BOB 525 420 75 8D 53 42 2 rsr mora q0;! '01) RM 504 75 430 5:� 42 2 of rrloaa 2 or more 90D 724 til) 504 IDG 84 70 56 T 2 or more 750 600 525 X20 1 M 84 70 56 9aeic minimum hourly volume b Llsad forcambinelicn of OontliMns A ane 6 altar adaquate Irial of other remetlial measures May be used when the rnalcr-street speed exoeeds 4:0 mph or In an isolated oommunity with a r}apulalion of less thark 14,040 "May be used lar combinalian of Condilions A and B after adecluate trial of other remedial measures wnen the majuY atrC '.s;Lie:cl uxuetV_-1C'ur'Clr cl p-7 is :l'C -_'u .riiL:i0..v wrl—ti r:nll-Az I Un Ul Irtss r=1'Y 10.0m Figure 12: Future(2041)Without Project 8-Hour Warrant Volume Thresholds Table 11: Future(2041)Volumes at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue Time 2021 NBT 2041 NBT Alii Drive 2041 Major Minor Pass Pass and SBT and SBT NBR and SBL Volume Volume Condition A? Condition B? 7-00 AM-8:00 AM 532 714 74 788 119 Yes Yes 8:00 AM-9:00 AM 478 641 68 709 107 Yes Yes 9:00 AM-10:00 AM 465 624 90 714 109 Yes Yes 10:00 AM-11:00 AM 522 700 85 785 124 Yes Yes 1:30 PM-2:30 PM 601 806 129 935 129 Yes Yes 2:30 PM-3:30 PM 612 821 116 937 113 Yes Yes 3:30 PM-4:30 PM 632 848 120 968 121 Yes Yes 4:30 P M-5:30 P M 632 1 848 1 141 989 78 No Yes 25 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Traffic signal Warrant 2, 4-Hour Hour Warrant, from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (FHWA, 2009), was also analyzed for the Future (2041) Without Project conditions. Table 12 shows the volumes used for the 4-hour analysis. Figure 4C-4 (70%) Factor was used based on the local population. Figure 13 shows the Future (2041) Without Project 4-Hour Warrant Analysis with the major and minor volumes marked in red dots.Analysis of the Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue intersection resulted in it passing the 4-Hour Warrant. Table 12: Future(2041)Volumes at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue 2021 NBT 2041 NBT Alii Drive 2041 Major Minor Passes 4-Hour Time and SBT and SBT NBRand SBL Volume Volume Warrant? 7-00 AM-8:00 AM 532 714 74 788 119 Yes 8:00 A M-9:00 A M 478 641 68 709 107 Yes 9:00 AM- 10:00 AM 465 624 90 714 109 Yes 10:00 AM- 11:00 AM 522 700 85 785 124 Yes 1:30 PM- 2:30 PM 601 806 129 935 129 Yes 2:30 PM-3:30 PM 612 821 116 937 113 Yes 3:30 PM-4:30 PM 632 848 120 968 121 Yes 4:30 P M-5:30 P M 1 632 1 848 1 141 989 78 Yes Figure 4C-2. Warrant 2, Four=Hour Vehicular Volume(70% Factor) (OOIYIMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 44 MPRs ON MAJOR STREET} dQp OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES 3Dn MINOR 2 OR MORE LANES& 1 LANE STREET HIGHER- 2W 1 LAME&1 LANE VOLUME APPROACH - VPH I 11DO aa• so 20D 300 409 500 600 700 500 990 1000 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) -Note:80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or nwre lanes and 00 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with ons lane. Figure 13: Future(2041)Without Project 4-Hour Warrant The current intersection is all-way stop-controlled. This intersection was also analyzed as signalized intersection with permitted left turns and as a single-lane roundabout. Results are provided in Table 13 and movements that operate at LOS E or worse are highlighted in yellow.The signalized intersection with permitted southbound left turns would operate at LOS B during the AM and PM peak hours. The single- lane roundabout would operate at LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours. However, this intersection may not be able to fit a single-lane roundabout within the available ROW. 26 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Table 13: Future(2041)Without Project LOS-Mitigation at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue AM Peak PM Peak AWSC(Existing Condition) Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 24.6 - C 27.8 - D Alii NBThrough-Right 32.5 0.87 D 24.1 0.77 C Alii SB Left-Through 18.5 0.67 C 35.7 0.89 E Queen Kalama WB Left 11.3 0.11 B 11.9 0.15 B Queen Kalama WB Right 10.6 0.19 B 10.8 0.19 B AM Peak PM Peak Signalized Delay Delay v/c LOS v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 13.0 - B 12.5 - B Alii NBThrough-Right 13.8 0.67 B 10.5 0.52 B Alii SB Left-Through 11.6 0.55 B 13.3 0.65 B Queen Kalama WB Left 13.1 0.09 B 15.8 0.13 B Queen Kalama WB Right 14.2 0.21 B 16.7 0.21 B AM Peak PM Peak Single-Lane Roundabout Delay Delay v/c LOS v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 7.2 - A 7.5 - A Alii NBApproach 8.0 0.49 A 7.3 0.43 A Alii SB Approach 1 6.1 0.36 A 7.9 0.48 A Queen Kalama WB Approach 1 7.3 0.21 A 6.5 0.20 A S. Mitigation Future(2041)Without Project at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue The Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue intersection is projected to operate at an acceptable LOS. However, existing field conditions show that during the PM peak hour, the northbound queue on Route 11 is reaching Laaloa Avenue. The Route 11 and Lako Street intersection bottleneck in the PM peak hour has been recognized by various traffic studies. The north-south regional capacity is currently being serviced by a two-lane Alii Drive and two-lane Route 11.The north-south capacity will need to be increased through the widening of Route 11 from Henry Street to Kamehameha III Road or the construction of the Alii Highway extension. 27 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International IV. FUTURE WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS The project will include the development of 62 single-family residential units.The site is currently vacant. One roadway access is planned from an extension of Naniloa Drive which connects to Queen Kalama Avenue and Alii Drive. Another roadway access is proposed via an easement through an adjacent vacant parcel makai of the Laipala Makai project. The developer is proposing to construct the project on an existing vacant 11.054-acre lot in Kahaluu- Keauhou. The project will include the development of 62 residential units over 3 phases. The project will have the anticipated phased construction schedule: • Phase 1 to be completed in 2023 (19 of 62 units); • Phase 2 to be completed in 2024(19 of 62 units); and • Phase 3 to be completed in 2025 (24 of 62 units). Trips resulting from the buildout of the 62 units were included in the Future (2026), (2031) and (2041) With Project analysis. A. Future With Project Generated Volumes 1. Project Related Volumes The expected traffic from the proposed project was determined using the following four-step methodology:trip generation,trip distribution, modal choice, and route assignment. aJ Trip Generation Trip generation was calculated for the proposed 50 residential unit development using rates from Trip Generation, 10th Edition (ITE, February 2020) which is standard traffic engineering practice. The Single- Family Detached Housing(ITE Code 210)was used for the calculations. Calculated project related trips for the peak hour of the adjacent street are shown in Table 14. Table 14: Development Trip Generation Rates Independent Variable AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Equation In% Out% Equation I In% Out Dwelling Units T=0.71(X) +4.80 25 k 75 Ln(T) =0.96 Ln(X) +0.20 1 63 37 Using the trip generation rates in Table 14, the estimated trips expected from the development were calculated and are shown in Table 15. Table 15: Project Related Development Phasing and Trips Generated Analysis #of AM Peak PM Peak Weekday Total Year Units In I Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 2026 62 12 1 37 1 49 40 24 1 64 335 335 670 bJ Trip Distribution/Assignment At the existing study intersections, project related trips were distributed based on the 2021 turning movements. Figure 14 shows the forecast project related trips at the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours. 28 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Alii Dr Route 11 m � 1 �} y 41 t U y v 1� t ri m 1 15(s) 3 (2) a' Ali`, Dr Route 11 Alii Dr Naniloa Dr 0 o A m m m m + 4-) 7K U RL n > Alii Dr Naniloa Dr AN Dr HgKfty extension m s ° 6 aloa Ave ( } �' U 4 : T [6 4 1 y 00 m � ween I(alama Ave Alii Dr Lenend #(#� Peak Hour Volumes Signalized ❑ Unsignalized Proposed AM (PM) S IntersectionU Intersection Stop Sign = 2 Driveway to (vehlhr) Project Site Figure 14: Laipala Makai PUD Project Related Trips 29 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International cJ Modal Choice To assume the worst-case condition for traffic, all project related external trips were assumed to be by private vehicle only. d) Future With Project Volumes Future With Project conditions were calculated through the following methods: • Future (2026) With Project (see Figure 15) is a sum of the Future (2026) Without Project (Figure 9) and the Laipala Makai PUD Project Generated Traffic (Figure 14). • Future (2031) With Project (see Figure 16) is a sum of the Future (2031) Without Project (Figure 10) and the Laipala Makai PUD Project Generated Traffic (Figure 14). • Future (2041) With Project (see Figure 17) is a sum of the Future (2041) Without Project (Figure 11) and the Laipala Makai PUD Project Generated Traffic (Figure 14). 30 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Ali'i Dr Route 11 m � ry v 81(33} 1 � � 39 i55} y 41 U ° v 131(101} o `+ Z$(2S) UJ w W ti..' W � A AN Dr Route 11 Ali'i Dr Naniloa Dr N j] +-4(7) T 12(S) 7 7K 0(0} 7[ U t B 4( LJ v m D o N D N CCD o(2) o o CD wLn rn Ali'i Dr Naniloa Dr Ali'i Dr 0 N u ,+ ��Proposed Alli ia�5t HgKwO extension 18(12) 6'aloa Ave- s U 4 : T (-4CD [6 4 1 m F. V ±=ween I(alama Ave Ali'i Dr Lenend #(#} Peak Hour Volumes Signalized ❑ Unsignalized Proposed AM (PM) S Intersection U Intersection Stop Sign = Driveway to (vehlhr) Project Site Figure 15: Future(2026)With Project Peak Hour Volumes 31 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Ali'i Dr Route 11 V, o� rev 81(83) nrn 1 39(55} v v �n v v 1 LJ ti 137 (104) o m -P- AN Dr Route 11 Ali'i Dr Naniloa Dr m v n p V� � 1�1} p m o l($) CD m o 4F-4(7} v � y ED A ( ) O W F.. CD CD CD � o Ali'i Dr Naniloa Dr AIN Dr A.W IarH 5t H Kfty extension 22(15) —14(11) 6aloa Ave S$ k U Q _ ' T (-400 [6 4 1 V r CD �,�.� ±��ueen I(alama Ave Alii Dr Lenend #(#} Peak Hour Volumes Signalized ❑ Unsignalized Proposed AM (PM) S Intersection U Intersection Stop Sign = Driveway to (vehlhr) Project Site Figure 16: Future(2031)With Project Peak Hour Volumes 32 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International Ali'i Dr Route 11 V N m (3 3} 1 39(55; r v rn m r y 41 U y v T fi fi 137 (10+1) o LD 29(25) Z NJ CO V o AN Dr Route 11 Ali'i Dr Naniloa Dr m LD p V 1�1} p in o 1($} CD m o �4�3} M v y ED CD CD o{�} own CD � o Ln A Ali'i Dr Naniloa Dr AIN Dr A.[�V IarH 5t Highwdy extension m m22{ } 1. �810d Ave S$ k U Q _ ' T (-4 < 4 1 to rn y 6) r ueen I(alama Ave Ali'i Dr Lenend #(#} Peak Hour Volumes Signalized ❑ Unsignalized Proposed AM (PM) S Intersection U Intersection Stop Sign = Driveway to (vehlhr) Project Site Figure 17: Future(2041)With Project Peak Hour Volumes 33 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International B. Future With Project Level of Service 1. Future(2026)With Project Conditions Future (2026) With Project intersection and movement LOS and delay (in seconds per vehicle) was determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software and are shown in Table 16. The cycle length and phasing at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue was optimized. The future intersection of Alii Drive and the proposed project driveway was analyzed as a two-way stop-controlled intersection with a shared left-right turn exit lane controlled by a stop sign. Table 16: Future(2026)With Project LOS AM Peak PM Peak Intersection and Movement Delay Delay v/c LOS v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Queen Kalama Avenue Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 0.0 0.00 A 8.2 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 17.0 0.06 C 14.8 0.07 B Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 15.6 - C 17.6 - C Alii NBThrough-Right 18.3 0.70 C 16.3 0.62 C Alii SB Left-Through 14.1 0.54 B 20.9 0.73 C Queen Kalama WB Left 10.7 0.10 B 11.3 0.14 B Queen Kalama WB Right 10.0 0.18 A 10.1 0.17 B Queen Kalama Avenue& Naniloa Drive Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Queen Kalama EB approach 7.3 0.01 A 7.3 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 0.0 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 A Naniloa NB approach 9.5 0.07 A 9.6 0.07 A Naniloa SB approach 9.1 0.04 A 10.0 0.15 B Route 11& Laaloa Avenue 19.9 - B 24.1 - C Route 11 NB Left 12.7 0.10 B 17.4 0.22 B Route 11NBThrough 12.4 0.69 B 19.0 0.87 B Route 11 SB Through 26.9 0.86 C 29.9 0.91 C Laaloa EB Left 23.9 0.39 C 28.2 0.33 C Alii Drive&Proposed Driveway Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 8.2 0.01 A 8.2 0.02 A Proposed Driveway WB exit 12.9 0.07 B 13.8 1 0.05 B All intersections and individual movements operate at an acceptable LOS and therefore mitigation is not needed for the Future (2026)With Project conditions. 34 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International 2. Future(2031)With Project Conditions Future (2031) With Project intersection and movement LOS and delay (in seconds per vehicle) was determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software and are shown in Table 17. The cycle length and phasing at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue was optimized. The future intersection of Alii Drive and the proposed project driveway was analyzed as a two-way stop-controlled intersection with a shared left-right turn exit lane controlled by a stop sign. Table 17: Future(2031)With Project LOS AM Peak PM Peak Intersection and Movement Delay Delay v/c LOS v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Queen Kalama Avenue Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 0.0 0.00 A 8.3 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 18.1 0.07 C 15.7 0.08 C Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 18.3 - C 20.4 - C Alii NBThrough-Right 22.7 0.76 C 18.5 0.68 C Alii SB Left-Through 15.3 0.59 B 25.0 0.79 C Queen Kalama WB Left 11.0 0.11 B 11.5 0.14 B Queen Kalama WB Right 10.2 0.18 B 10.4 0.18 B Queen Kalama Avenue& Naniloa Drive Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Queen Kalama EB approach 7.3 0.01 A 7.3 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 0.0 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 A Naniloa NB approach 9.6 0.09 A 9.7 0.09 A Naniloa SB approach 9.2 0.04 A 10.2 0.19 B Route 11& Laaloa Avenue 20.6 - C 24.6 - C Route 11 NB Left 13.9 0.11 B 19.4 0.24 B Route 11NBThrough 12.7 0.72 B 21.1 0.90 C Route 11 SB Through 27.5 0.88 C 27.7 0.90 C Laaloa EB Left 27.3 0.43 C 34.3 0.38 C Alii Drive&Proposed Driveway Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 8.3 0.01 A 1 8.=0.02 A Proposed Driveway WB exit 13.7 0.09 B 1 14.8 1 0.07 B All intersections and individual movements operate at an acceptable LOS and therefore mitigation is not needed for the Future (2031)With Project conditions. 35 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International 3. Future(2041)With Project Conditions Future (2041) With Project intersection and movement LOS and delay (in seconds per vehicle) was determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software and are shown in Table 18. The cycle length and phasing at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue was optimized. The future intersection of Alii Drive and the proposed driveway was analyzed as a two-way stop-controlled intersection with a shared left-right turn exit lane controlled by a stop sign. Movements that operate at LOS E or worse are highlighted in yellow. Table 18: Future(2041)With Project LOS AM Peak PM Peak Intersection and Movement Delay Delay v/c LOS v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Queen Kalama Avenue Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 0.0 0.00 A 8.5 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 21.1 0.08 C 18.0 0.09 C Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 26.6 - D 30.2 - D Alii NBThrough-Right 35.8 0.89 E 25.5 0.79 D Alii SB Left-Through 19.1 0.68 C 39.3 0.91 E Queen Kalama WB Left 11.4 0.11 B 11.9 0.15 B Queen Kalama WB Right 10.7 0.19 B 10.9 0.19 B Queen Kalama Avenue& Naniloa Drive Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Queen Kalama EB approach 7.3 0.01 A 7.3 0.01 A Queen Kalama WB approach 0.0 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 A Naniloa NB approach 9.6 0.09 A 9.7 0.09 A Naniloa SB approach 9.2 0.04 A 10.2 0.19 B Route 11& Laaloa Avenue 20.4 - C 37.2 - D Route 11 NB Left 15.9 0.12 B 30.2 0.33 C Route 11NBThrough 12.7 0.76 B 36.0 0.99 D Route 11 SB Through 25.0 0.87 C 38.4 0.98 D Laaloa EB Left 37.5 0.52 D 40.5 0.43 D Alii Drive&Proposed Driveway Unsignalized(TWSC) Unsignalized(TWSC) Alii SB Left-Through 8.6 0.01 A 8.5 0.02 A Proposed Driveway WB exit 15.2 0.10 B 16.7 0.08 C The northbound approach at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue operates at LOS E (v/c of 0.89) during the AM peak hour.The southbound approach at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue operates at LOS E(v/c of 0.91)during the PM peak hour. The LOS is a result of the increased traffic volume and the all-way stop-control at this intersection. Various mitigation measures for the Future (2041) Without Project condition were be analyzed. The v/c ratio for the northbound and southbound approaches at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue are 0.99 and 0.98, respectively. When the v/c ratio reaches 1.00,the movements will operate at LOS F.This is due to the traffic volume reaching the roadway capacity.Although the traffic analysis shows these movements operating at an acceptable LOS letter grade, this intersection should be monitored and improved if the LOS deteriorates to unacceptable levels. 36 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International 4. Mitigation Future(2041)With Project at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue This intersection was analyzed as a signalized intersection with permitted southbound left turns, and as a single-lane roundabout.The Future(2041)Without Project analysis showed unacceptable LOS for a TWSC and was not done for this condition, shown in Table 19. Movements that operate at LOS E or worse are highlighted in yellow. Table 19: Future(2041)Without Project LOS-Mitigation at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue AM Peak PM Peak AWSC(Existing Condition) Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 26.6 - D 30.2 - D Alii NBThrough-Right 35.8 0.89 E 25.5 0.79 D Alii SB Left-Through 19.1 0.68 C 39.3 0.91 E Queen Kalama WB Left 11.4 0.11 B 11.9 0.15 B Queen Kalama WB Right 10.7 0.19 B 10.9 0.19 B AM Peak PM Peak Signalized Delay Delay v/c LOS v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 13.3 - B 12.8 - B Alii NBThrough-Right 14.2 0.68 B 10.6 0.53 B Alii SB Left-Through 11.9 0.57 B 13.9 0.67 B Queen Kalama WB Left 13.1 0.09 B 15.8 0.13 B Queen Kalama WB Right 14.2 0.21 B 16.7 0.21 B AM Peak PM Peak Single-Lane Roundabout Delay Delay v/c LOS v/c LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Alii Drive&Laaloa Avenue 7.4 - A 7.6 - A Alii NBApproach 8.2 0.50 A 7.4 0.44 A Alii SB Approach 1 6.2 0.36 A 8.1 0.49 A Queen Kalama WB Approach 1 7.4 0.22 A 6.6 0.21 A The signalized intersection with permitted southbound left turns would operate at LOS B during the AM and PM peak hours. The single-lane roundabout would operate at LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours. However, a single-lane roundabout may not be able to fit within the existing ROW. 37 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International V. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Hawaii One1 Investors LLC is planning to develop an existing vacant 11.054-acre lot in Kahaluu-Keauhou, on the Island of Hawaii, on TMK(3) 7-7-08:121 parcel 121.The project will include the development of 62 single-family residential units. One access is planned from a planned extension of Naniloa Drive which connects to Queen Kalama Avenue and Alii Drive. A second is proposed via an easement through an adjacent vacant parcel.The project will have the following anticipated phased construction schedule: • Phase 1 to be completed in 2023 (19 of 62 units); • Phase 2 to be completed in 2024(19 of 62 units); and • Phase 3 to be completed in 2025 (24 of 62 units). The Laipala Makai project will have little impact to traffic delay at the Alii Drive at Queen Kalama Avenue and the Queen Kalama at Naniloa Drive intersections.At the proposed intersection of the project driveway and Alii Drive, a single-lane entrance and a single-lane exit will work acceptably. Traffic operations show that the all-way stop-control at Alii Drive and Laaloa Avenue will result in movements that operate at LOS E in Future (2041) Without Project and Future (2041) With Project conditions. The 8-Hour (Warrant 1 Condition B) and 4-Hour (Warrant 2) traffic signal warrants were satisfied and the resulting intersection analysis with a traffic signal with permitted phasing resulted in acceptable LOS for the intersection and movements. The future widening of Route 11 and/or the completion of the Alii Highway extension will likely lower the traffic volume at this intersection, resulting in better traffic operation at this intersection. It is recommended that this intersection be monitored, and the installation of a traffic signal be considered if needed. The v/c ratio for the northbound and southbound approaches at Route 11 and Laaloa Avenue will also be approaching LOS F in Future (2041). The north-south capacity will need to be increased through the widening of Route 11 from Henry Street to Kamehameha III Road or the construction of the Alii Highway extension, both of which have been planned for many years. 38 Laipala Makai PUD TIAR SSFM International VI. REFERENCES County of Hawaii. General Plan (2005). County of Hawaii. Hawaii Island Hele-On Bus, <http://heleonbus.org>. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation, 10th Edition: An ITE Informational Report, December 2008. Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQC). EA and EIS Online Library, Accessed 2021, <http://oegc.doh.hawaii.gov/default.aspx>. SSFM International, Traffic Impact Analysis Report for Laaloa Avenue County Park (2017). SSFM International, Traffic Impact Analysis Report for Royal Vistas (2019). State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Historical Traffic Station Maps. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Federal-Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the District of Hawaii, July 2014. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Statewide Transportation Improvements Program, <http://hawaii.gov/dot/highways/STIP>. The Traffic Management Consultant, Traffic Impact Analysis Report for Pualani Makai(2019). Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Highway Capacity Manual, Washington, D.C., 2010 Edition. Wilson Okamoto Corporation, Kona Community Development Plan (2005). 39 Appendix A — Traffic Count Data Type of peak hour being reported:User-Defined Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Alii Dr--Queen Kalama Ave QC JOB#: 15515801 CITY/STATE: Kahaluu-Keauhou, HI DATE:Thu,Aug 19 2021 121F370 Peak-Hour:7:15 AM—8:15 AM 4.2 2.4 + * Peak 15-Min:7:30 AM--7:45 AM + 0 61 0 0 . 4 L 0 4. 0 j L 1 #. 13 0 * 0L 0 t 0 70 0 * FBI * 0 0.65 0 t 0 0 w 0 1 r 12 #. 8 0 * 0 Z r 0 .. 0 + o.sz * 1- I �y} � +a: 2.4 273❑377 uaLit ounts 4 2.4 1%6&A THAT EW.WS CaMWONME5 0 7 0 -1 .0 4 . L 16I r •/ �23 00 r 0 i r 1 0 0 9 0 N/A L t ! � i t 1 L N/A w .� * N/A * N/A _ 1 4.N/A 7 M r r .0.. IN ' r N/A + I , N/A r F 15-Min Count All I Dr AIN Dr Queen Kalama Ave Queen Kalama Ave Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right u Totals 7:00 AM 0 64 2 0 1 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 107 7:15 AM 0 94 2 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 154 7:30 AM 0 113 2 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 186 7:45 AM 0 88 3 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 172 619 8:00 AM 0 74 1 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 139 651 8:15 AM 0 65 1 0 1 52 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 124 621 8:30 AM 0 81 0 0 1 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 148 583 8:45 AM 0 77 3 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 145 556 9:00 AM 0 68 1 1 1 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 131 548 9:15 AM 0 89 3 0 2 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 147 571 9:30 AM 0 63 4 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 134 557 9:45 AM 0 75 2 0 1 81 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 164 576 10:00 AM 0 72 5 0 1 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 155 600 10:15 AM 0 62 3 0 1 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 150 603 10:30 AM 0 70 4 0 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 169 638 10:45 AM 0 68 3 1 2 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 155 629 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right u Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 452 8 0 0 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 744 Heavy Trucks 0 12 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 12 12 24 Bicycles 0 32 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 9/1/20211:09 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:System Peal< Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Alii Dr--Queen Kalama Ave QC JOB#: 15515802 CITY/STATE: Kahaluu-Keauhou, HI DATE:Thu,Aug 19 2021 3a6335 Peak-Hour:3:15 PM—4:15 PM 1.6 2.4 I a Oa9 * Peak 15-Min:4:00 PM--4:15 PM 14 + J 0 81 5 J 0 .6 ~ L 0 r 0 d ; 8 } 17 0 f 0 > t 37.5 t 17.6 70 0 *. Q90 * 0 EEI 0 t 0 0 .w 0 1 r 9 #. 24 0 w 0 1 r 0 + 4.2 0 327. 9a � _1 * 390❑346 15 1.7087 � � } � � } DATA THAT DRiWS COMMUNME5 0 6 0 v a L. �► 0 > ; 0 0e + 0 0 1 r 0 0 4 1 o F_ 0 4 1 N/A aA b L t > S1 L N/A w . t N/A * N/A _ 1 4.N/A '4 -" r - N ' ���-----�77i r N/A * , N/A r F 15-Min Count All I Dr AIN Dr Queen Kalama Ave Queen Kalama Ave Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 1:30 PM 0 97 3 0 1 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 176 1:45 PM 0 88 3 0 3 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 183 2:00 PM 0 71 1 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 160 2:15 PM 0 90 3 0 1 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 200 719 2:30 PM 0 80 2 0 5 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 176 719 2:45 PM 0 78 2 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 160 696 3:00 PM 0 85 4 0 2 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 716 3:15 PM 0 96 4 0 . 74 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 179 695 3:30 PM 0 67 4 0 1 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 167 686 3:45 PM 0 77 6 0 1 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 196 722 4:00 PM 0 87 5 0 1 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 207 749 4:15 PM 0 86 5 0 2 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 180 750 4:30 PM 0 79 3 0 1 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 189 772 4:45 PM 0 79 6 0 1 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 188 764 5:00 PM 0 74 5 0 1 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 190 747 5:15 PM 0 68 7 0 1 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 182 749 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 348 20 0 4 428 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 16 0 828 Heavy Trucks 0 4 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 16 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 4 4 Bicycles 0 8 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 20 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 8/27/20213:02 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:User-Defined Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Alii Dr-- La'aloa Ave QCJOB#: 15515803 CITY/STATE: Kahaluu-Keauhou, HI DATE:Thu,Aug 19 2021 267 421 Peak-Hour:7:15 AM—8:15 AM 6.7 2.4 I a 0J6 r Peak 15-Min:7:45 AM--8:00 AM I + + J v +1 1 v J v a �9 L 0 } 0 1 t 80 } 118 0 } 0 1 L 13 } 1.7 0 * Fo-ml 4. 0 0.76 0 * 0 0 * 0 i r 38 * 82 0 * 0 Z r 2.6 * 73 2.8 0 341 -1 111 * 41[ (1 *5 6 I } nt � + 6 29101-811377 l� �141�4 5.4 2.7 DATA THAT DRiWS COMPPRJUME5 0 7 0 v a L. �► 0 1 t 2 12 24 0 * + 0 t 0 i r 2 0 8 2 J N/A L aN/A b L + 1 � t + 1L N/A.► f N/A N/A o _ 1 4.N/A 3 r > r -14 1 F 15-Min Count AIM Dr AIN Dr La'aloa Ave La'aloa Ave Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right u Totals 7:00 AM 0 47 3 0 5 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 21 0 124 7:15 AM 0 80 6 0 10 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 24 0 163 7:30 AM 0 97 7 0 13 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 24 0 211 7:45 AM 0 103 13 0 17 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 16 0 227 725 8:00 AM 0 61 10 0 6 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 16 0 161 762 8:15 AM 0 68 8 0 6 41 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 0 21 0 156 755 8:30 AM 0 58 9 0 11 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 16 0 163 707 8:45 AM 0 81 6 0 12 54 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 14 0 175 655 9:00 AM 0 61 7 0 13 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 21 0 158 652 9:15 AM 0 68 19 0 11 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 14 0 176 672 9:30 AM 0 75 9 0 13 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 14 0 167 676 9:45 AM 0 56 12 0 6 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 15 0 163 664 10:00 AM 0 78 7 0 6 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 12 0 192 698 10:15 AM 0 57 11 0 12 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 4 0 169 691 10:30 AM 0 62 11 0 11 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 14 0 190 714 10:45 AM 0 59 9 0 18 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 22 0 180 731 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right u Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 412 52 0 68 284 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 64 0 908 Heavy Trucks 0 24 0 4 16 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 48 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 16 28 44 Bicycles 0 16 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 9/1/20211:09 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:System Peal< Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Alii Dr-- La'aloa Ave QCJOB#: 15515804 CITY/STATE: Kahaluu-Keauhou, HI DATE:Thu,Aug 19 2021 407 379 Peak-Hour:3:15 PM—4:15 PM 1.7 1.6 Peak 15-Min:3:45 PM--4:00 PM I + + Jv a1 ' L J v + + L 0 4. 0 4 ; 76 ♦. 125 0 } 0 L 0 } OB F 0 w Fo98 4. 0 EE 0 } 0 00.- 0 '4 r 49 � 112 0 * 0 Z r 2 * 3.6 0 302 3 � 0 2 8.1 � + + 38 ❑339 1B 2.7a aL } � n} 1%6&A THAT EW.WS CaMWONME5 0 3 2 -1 .0 4 . L �► 0 1 6 L 0 � + 0 0 i r 0 0 6 0 r N/A L +A b L N/A.i 4. N/A N/A o _ 1 4.N/A 01 N r /A + F /A * F 15-Min Count AIM Dr AIN Dr La'aloa Ave La'aloa Ave Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 1:30 PM 0 76 13 0 12 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 21 0 218 1:45 PM 0 82 12 0 18 63 0 1 0 0 0 0 13 0 20 0 209 2:00 PM 0 73 14 0 28 76 0 1 0 0 0 0 18 0 15 0 225 2:15 PM 0 69 10 0 22 83 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 15 0 210 862 2:30 PM 0 79 10 0 16 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 12 0 217 861 2:45 PM 0 68 13 0 20 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 13 0 199 851 3:00 PM 0 67 19 0 14 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 20 0 205 831 3:15 PM 0 91 8 0 16 77 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 fi0 0 18 0 220 841 3:30 PM 0 80 11 0 14 72 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 21 0 209 833 3:45 PM 0 66 Er 0 25 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 22 0 223 857 4:00 PM 0 65 11 0 20 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 15 0 219 871 4:15 PM 0 81 13 0 19 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 14 0 223 874 4:30 PM 0 78 6 0 29 84 0 2 0 0 0 0 9 0 7 0 215 880 4:45 PM 0 60 7 0 19 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 11 0 199 856 5:00 PM 0 75 13 0 28 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 10 0 230 867 5:15 PM 0 55 16 0 1 23 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 10 0 209 853 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 264 28 0 100 348 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 88 0 892 Heavy Trucks 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 8/27/20213:02 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:User-Defined Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Naniloa Dr--Queen Kalama Ave QC JOB#: 15515805 CITY/STATE: Kahaluu-Keauhou, HI DATE:Thu,Aug 19 2021 3 3 Peak-Hour:7:15 AM—8:15 AM 0 0 j 038 r Peak 15-Min:7:15 AM--7:30 AM 4 J j 0 0 0 4 L 7 } 1 j 1 1 4. 5 0 4- 0 t 0 t 0 0.63 4 Q63 t 4 0.42 0 w t 0 5 * 0 i r o w s 0 w 0 1 r 0 w 0 -1*'[;*5 -1 4 0 2 u aLi t o� nts 0 0 1%6&A THAT EWiWS COMMUNME5 0 0 0 -1 .0 4 '. L �► 0 > ; 0 3 1 0 w + 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 N/A L N/A V t ! t + 1 t N/A w t N/A N/A o - 1 A-N/A j N/A * N/A r F 15-Min Count Naniloa Dr Naniloa Dr Queen Kalama Ave Queen Kalama Ave Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right u Totals 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 6 7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 16 8:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 7 16 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 15 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 6 17 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 9:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 16 9:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 15 9:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 10:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 16 10:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 17 10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 22 10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 21 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right u Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 4 0 24 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 9/1/20211:10 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:System Peal< Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Naniloa Dr--Queen Kalama Ave QC JOB#: 15515806 CITY/STATE: Kahaluu-Keauhou, HI DATE:Thu,Aug 19 2021 2 6 Peak-Hour:3:15 PM—4:15 PM 0 0 Peak 15-Min:3:15 PM--3:30 PM + + a 1 0 • L 9 } 5 ! ; 1 8 22.2 r 0 1 L O } 25 0.79 15 F=1t 7 0.67 0 w *28.6 22 * 2 i r 0 r 15 45 50 ,4 r 0 * 0 'o 0 0 a: 0 0 0 * "F_ -14 , F 2 ❑ 0 l� Ll 4 A�ou1�4 50 0 1%6&A THAT EWiWS COMMUNME5 0 0 0 v a 4 �► 0 > ; 0 1 0 1 + 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 N/A aA V L t ! S1 L N/A.4- t N/A N/A o _ 1 4.N/A '4 r > C -1 4 1 F 15-Min Count Naniloa Dr Naniloa Dr Queen Kalama Ave Queen Kalama Ave Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 1:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 1:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 11 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 25 2:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 8 27 2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 18 3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 21 3:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 2 1 0 10 24 3:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 24 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 3 0 0 8 30 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 32 4:15 PM 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 32 4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 8 32 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 32 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 31 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 1 0 0 2 1 0 10 31 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 16 0 4 0 8 4 0 40 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 8/27/20213:02 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:User-Defined Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Route 11--La'aloa Ave QC JOB#: 15515807 CITY/STATE: Kahaluu-Keauhou, HI DATE:Thu,Aug 19 2021 613 797 Peak-Hour:7:15 AM—8:15 AM 5 4.9 a 0'9 * Peak 15-Min:7:30 AM--7:45 AM + d * L. L J + 4 L 628 81 } 107 d t 0 r 0 4.9 }5.6 t 0 r 0 0.74 0 * Fo-%] t 0�0 0 t 0 130* 23 7 r 0 � 0 4.6* 0 Z r 0 0 ;6 690 3.8 8 0 651❑716 I aLi 4 oun`s 4.8 4.7 PA:A TMT EWiWS C: 0 0 0 -1 .0 4 . L �S 1 0 > i 0 2 0 0 + 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 J N/A t 1 +A V L L N/A-0- t N/A h 1 y� N/A w _ 1 4.N/A z ~ ~ r �S > r -14 1 F 15-Min Count Route 11 Route 11 La'aloa Ave La'aloa Ave Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right u Totals 7:00 AM 5 192 0 0 0 138 10 0 20 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 370 7:15 AM 6 158 0 0 0 160 8 0 40 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 376 7:30 AM 6 183 0 0 0 181 9 0 17 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 405 7:45 AM 4 180 0 0 0 152 16 0 22 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 379 1530 8:00 AM 10 169 0 0 0 135 22 0 28 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 369 1529 8:15 AM 12 162 0 0 0 140 15 0 34 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 369 1522 8:30 AM 3 187 0 0 0 140 23 0 17 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 377 1494 8:45 AM 4 168 0 0 0 137 16 0 26 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 354 1469 9:00 AM 9 171 0 0 0 118 18 0 26 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 356 1456 9:15 AM 3 188 0 0 0 148 27 0 29 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 399 1486 9:30 AM 4 170 0 0 0 161 22 0 28 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 390 1499 9:45 AM 8 158 0 0 0 164 20 0 22 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 375 1520 10:00 AM 3 165 0 0 0 158 21 0 21 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 370 1534 10:15 AM 2 156 0 0 0 189 21 0 21 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 395 1530 10:30 AM 5 173 0 0 0 160 33 0 16 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 393 1533 10:45 AM 7 180 0 0 0 164 34 0 29 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 421 1579 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right u Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 24 732 0 0 0 724 36 0 68 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 1620 Heavy Trucks 0 28 0 0 36 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 9/1/20211:10 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:System Peal< Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Route 11--La'aloa Ave QC JOB#: 15515808 CITY/STATE: Kahaluu-Keauhou, HI DATE:Thu,Aug 19 2021 921 Peak-Hour:3:15 PM—4:15 PM 23 3.8 i'E * Peak 15-Min:3:45 PM--4:00 PM I • J 9 J6 +75 O J .1 4 . 2.3 L 136 } 81 1 L 0 t 0 2.2 +3.71 L 0 r 0 0.76 0 Q9a t 0 �0 0 t 0 100 19 i r 0 0 3 * 0 Z i 0 0 '*� * a: F 794F&D uaLl 4Counts 23 3.8 0 0 0 .0 4 . L �S 1 0 > i 0 1 0 0 + 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 N/A 1 N/A d / t ! � L t � 1L N/A.4- * N/A N/A w _ 1 4.N/A i t 4- > C -1 4 F 15-Min Count Route 11 Route 11 La'aloa Ave La'aloa Ave Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 1:30 PM 2 169 0 0 0 201 32 0 28 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 435 1:45 PM 3 206 0 0 0 188 25 0 29 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 458 2:00 PM 6 168 0 0 0 178 21 0 26 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 401 2:15 PM 4 189 0 0 0 218 31 0 29 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 481 1775 2:30 PM 8 179 0 0 0 181 21 0 20 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 411 1751 2:45 PM 5 186 0 0 0 194 30 0 21 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 444 1737 3:00 PM 4 198 0 0 0 189 32 0 21 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 450 1786 3:15 PM 11 241 0 0 0 174 20 0 19 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 471 1776 3:30 PM 11 181 0 0 0 194 21 0 25 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 434 1799 3:45 PM 11 226 0 0 0 206 34 0 9 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 492 1847 4:00 PM 7 192 0 0 0 201 21 0 28 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 454 1851 4:15 PM 4 168 0 0 0 234 11 0 22 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 447 1827 4:30 PM 6 174 0 0 0 203 15 0 22 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 425 1818 4:45 PM 4 148 0 0 0 226 19 0 18 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 417 1743 5:00 PM 7 150 0 0 0 210 29 0 31 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 432 1721 5:15 PM 6 144 0 0 0 215 25 0 17 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 411 1685 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 44 904 0 0 0 824 136 0 36 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 1968 Heavy Trucks 0 32 0 0 16 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 60 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 8/27/20213:02 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of report:Tube Count-Volume Data LOCATION:Ali'i Dr btwn La'aloa Ave and Queen Kalama Ave QC JOB#:15515809 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION:NB,SB CITY/STATE:Kahaluu-Keauhou,HI Aug 19 2021-Aug 19 2021 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Average Week Profile 19 Aug 21 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 28 28 28 0 01:00 AM 13 13 13 0 02:00 AM 11 11 11 0 03:00 AM 12 12 12 0 04:00 AM 22 22 22 0 05:00 AM 70 70 70 0 06:00 AM 276 276 276 0 07:00 AM 616 616 616 08:00 AM 533 533 533 09:00 AM 555 555 555 10:00 AM 598 598 598 11:00 AM 611 611 611 12:00 PM 633 633 633 01:00 PM 679 679 679 02:00 PM 667 667 667 03:00 PM 701 701 701 04:00 PM 725 725 725 05:00 PM 641 641 641 06:00 PM 474 474 474 0 07:00 PM 303 303 303 0 08:00 PM 227 227 227 0 09:00 PM 161 161 161 0 10:00 PM 91 91 91 0 11:00 PM 65 65 65 r] Day Total 8712 8712 8712 Weekday 100% Average Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 616 616 616 PM Peak 4:00 PM 4:00 PM 4:00 PM Volume 725 725 725 Comments: Report generated on 8/26/2021 11:50 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net) Traffic Data Service �\ Traffic Station Sketch N Island:Hawaii Area:Kona Section ID/Station#: B71018600408 Laaloa Avenue D2 4 Alii Drive ------------------------------- ----------------------- D1 10 1 Queen Kalama Avenue Meter# File Name GPS L bw61 D0724035 B71018600408 19.58884,-155.9715 D0724036_B71018600408 Station Description: Alii Drive: Laaloa Avenue to Queen Kalama Avenue Survey Beginning Date/Time: Survey Ending Date/Time: 7/24/13 @ 0000 7/25/13 @ 2400 Survey Method: Road Tube Data Type: Class Survey Crew: LM C1B Sketch Updated: By: SR Remarks: 1346 FACILITY NAME JURI FUNC AREA ROUTE CLASS TYPE NO. MILE Alii Drive 17 0186 D 1=Direction to End D 1:Queen Kalama Avenue/Mamalahoa Bypass D2=Direction to Begin D2:Laaloa Avenue/Kuakini Highway Run Date:2014/05/29 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2013 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 6100 Functional Class:URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 186 Location: Alii Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 07/24/2013 12:00-12:15 4 6 10 06:00-06:15 18 12 30 12:00-12:15 93 77 170 06:00-06:15 49 42 91 12:15-12:30 3 4 7 06:15-06:30 21 18 39 12:15-12:30 79 85 164 06:15-06:30 57 57 114 12:30-12:45 2 3 5 06:30-06:45 21 28 49 12:30-12:45 75 83 158 06:30-06:45 64 52 116 12:45-01:00 2 2 4 06:45-07:00 33 45 78 12:45-01:00 64 89 153 06:45-07:00 39 41 80 01:00-01:15 3 3 6 07:00-07:15 33 38 71 01:00-01:15 99 85 184 07:00-07:15 47 52 99 01:15-01:30 2 1 3 07:15-07:30 48 48 96 01:15-01:30 56 89 145 07:15-07:30 50 45 95 01:30-01:45 0 2 2 07:30-07:45 50 32 82 01:30-01:45 68 81 149 07:30-07:45 43 37 80 01:45-02:00 1 1 2 07:45-08:00 49 44 93 01:45-02:00 76 83 159 07:45-08:00 45 28 73 02:00-02:15 0 3 3 08:00-08:15 41 40 81 02:00-02:15 68 64 132 08:00-08:15 45 15 60 02:15-02:30 0 1 1 08:15-08:30 62 47 109 02:15-02:30 85 67 152 08:15-08:30 38 21 59 02:30-02:45 2 0 2 08:30-08:45 57 47 104 02:30-02:45 98 68 166 08:30-08:45 19 16 35 02:45-03:00 2 1 3 08:45-09:00 74 53 127 02:45-03:00 64 88 152 08:45-09:00 29 20 49 03:00-03:15 3 1 4 09:00-09:15 50 52 102 03:00-03:15 74 60 134 09:00-09:15 33 17 50 03:15-03:30 0 2 2 09:15-09:30 65 52 117 03:15-03:30 83 75 158 09:15-09:30 19 33 52 03:30-03:45 0 1 1 09:30-09:45 52 54 106 03:30-03:45 84 89 173 09:30-09:45 21 28 49 03:45-04:00 0 0 0 09:45-10:00 79 48 127 03:45-04:00 68 92 160 09:45-10:00 19 25 44 04:00-04:15 3 1 4 10:00-10:15 65 64 129 04:00-04:15 74 71 145 10:00-10:15 15 16 31 04:15-04:30 2 2 4 10:15-10:30 59 69 128 04:15-04:30 90 81 171 10:15-10:30 10 16 26 04:30-04:45 1 4 5 10:30-10:45 74 62 136 04:30-04:45 59 61 120 10:30-10:45 10 12 22 04:45-05:00 4 3 7 10:45-11:00 64 87 151 04:45-05:00 74 49 123 10:45-11:00 5 4 9 05:00-05:15 6 10 16 11:00-11:15 75 71 146 05:00-05:15 69 58 127 11:00-11:15 9 8 17 05:15-05:30 6 3 9 11:15-11:30 58 82 140 05:15-05:30 80 60 140 11:15-11:30 7 6 13 05:30-05:45 13 10 23 11:30-11:45 72 74 146 05:30-05:45 66 63 129 11:30-11:45 5 3 8 05:45-06:00 4 13 17 11:45-12:00 63 95 158 05:45-06:00 47 48 95 11:45-12:00 6 4 10 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 234 187 421 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 316 333 649 AM-K FACTOR(%) 5.59 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.62 AM-D(%) 55.58 44.42 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.69 51.31 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 234 187 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 316 333 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM PM-PEAK HR TIME 12:15 PM to 01:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 268 322 590 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 317 342 659 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.84 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.76 AM-D(%) 45.42 54.58 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.10 51.90 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,283 1,262 2,545 PEAK HR TIME 12:15 PM to 01:15 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,346 1,339 2,685 PEAK HR VOLUME 317 342 659 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 1,793 1,766 3,559 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,477 2,364 4,841 PEAK HR TIME 01:45 PM to 02:45 PM 12:30 PM to 01:30 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 3,823 3,703 7,526 PEAK HR VOLUME 327 346 D(%) 50.80 49.20 100.00 Run Date:2014/05/29 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2013 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 6100 Functional Class:URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 186 Location: Alii Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 07/25/2013 12:00-12:15 7 5 12 06:00-06:15 20 15 35 12:00-12:15 83 54 137 06:00-06:15 78 5 83 12:15-12:30 2 7 9 06:15-06:30 24 18 42 12:15-12:30 63 30 93 06:15-06:30 71 11 82 12:30-12:45 0 2 2 06:30-06:45 31 28 59 12:30-12:45 76 20 96 06:30-06:45 72 62 134 12:45-01:00 3 3 6 06:45-07:00 39 34 73 12:45-01:00 59 11 70 06:45-07:00 52 48 100 01:00-01:15 2 2 4 07:00-07:15 38 43 81 01:00-01:15 56 8 64 07:00-07:15 45 51 96 01:15-01:30 0 2 2 07:15-07:30 40 30 70 01:15-01:30 62 13 75 07:15-07:30 58 38 96 01:30-01:45 0 1 1 07:30-07:45 50 37 87 01:30-01:45 65 13 78 07:30-07:45 41 39 80 01:45-02:00 1 0 1 07:45-08:00 62 34 96 01:45-02:00 64 9 73 07:45-08:00 41 29 70 02:00-02:15 1 0 1 08:00-08:15 55 46 101 02:00-02:15 69 11 80 08:00-08:15 34 26 60 02:15-02:30 0 0 0 08:15-08:30 58 53 111 02:15-02:30 69 3 72 08:15-08:30 30 30 60 02:30-02:45 2 3 5 08:30-08:45 45 43 88 02:30-02:45 76 4 80 08:30-08:45 36 26 62 02:45-03:00 0 0 0 08:45-09:00 49 37 86 02:45-03:00 83 13 96 08:45-09:00 36 18 54 03:00-03:15 2 3 5 09:00-09:15 56 34 90 03:00-03:15 65 7 72 09:00-09:15 35 16 51 03:15-03:30 0 1 1 09:15-09:30 56 36 92 03:15-03:30 73 7 80 09:15-09:30 33 35 68 03:30-03:45 1 1 2 09:30-09:45 60 33 93 03:30-03:45 69 7 76 09:30-09:45 19 19 38 03:45-04:00 1 0 1 09:45-10:00 56 18 74 03:45-04:00 84 15 99 09:45-10:00 33 14 47 04:00-04:15 3 2 5 10:00-10:15 56 30 86 04:00-04:15 71 15 86 10:00-10:15 26 1 27 04:15-04:30 2 2 4 10:15-10:30 92 18 110 04:15-04:30 81 14 95 10:15-10:30 16 0 16 04:30-04:45 6 4 10 10:30-10:45 60 19 79 04:30-04:45 85 9 94 10:30-10:45 10 0 10 04:45-05:00 1 2 3 10:45-11:00 52 12 64 04:45-05:00 87 8 95 10:45-11:00 11 3 14 05:00-05:15 3 10 13 11:00-11:15 70 16 86 05:00-05:15 74 6 80 11:00-11:15 8 1 9 05:15-05:30 14 2 16 11:15-11:30 63 16 79 05:15-05:30 71 6 77 11:15-11:30 7 3 10 05:30-05:45 10 16 26 11:30-11:45 72 12 84 05:30-05:45 87 7 94 11:30-11:45 3 0 3 05:45-06:00 12 13 25 11:45-12:00 72 49 121 05:45-06:00 64 11 75 11:45-12:00 7 0 7 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:45 AM to 08:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 06:00 PM to 07:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 220 176 396 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 273 126 399 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.26 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.31 AM-D(%) 55.56 44.44 100.00 PM-D(%) 68.42 31.58 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:15 PM to 05:15 PM 06:00 PM to 07:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 225 179 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 327 126 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:45 AM to 08:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 06:30 PM to 07:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 220 176 396 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 227 199 426 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.26 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.81 AM-D(%) 55.56 44.44 100.00 PM-D(%) 53.29 46.71 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,276 711 1,987 PEAK HR TIME 11:45 AM to 12:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,349 792 2,141 PEAK HR VOLUME 294 153 447 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 1,736 301 2,037 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,538 776 3,314 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 11:45 AM to 12:45 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 3,887 1,568 5,455 PEAK HR VOLUME 297 153 D(%) 71.26 28.74 100.00 Run Date: 2014/05/29 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2013 Site ID: B71018600408 Route No: 186 Date From: 2013/07/24 0:00 Town: Hawaii Direction: +MP Date To: 2013/07/25 23:45 Location: Alii Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave Functional Classification: 17 URBAWCOLLECTOR REPORT TOTALS-48 HOURS RECORDED VOLUME % NUMBER OF AXLES Cycles 308 2.37% 615 PC 3241 24.97% 6482 2A-4T 5599 43.13% 11198 ------------------------ ------------ LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS 9148 70.47% 18295 HEAVY VEHICLES Bus 2530 19.49% 6325 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 1208 9.31% 2416 3A-SU 55 0.42% 165 4A-SU 1 0.01% 4 SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 29 0.22% 116 5A-ST 2 0.02% 10 6A-ST 4 0.03% 24 MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 4 0.03% 20 6A-MT 0 0.00% 0 7A-MT 0 0.00% 0 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 3833 29.53% 9080 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 12981 (A) 100.00% 27375 (B) UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 0 0.00% AXLE ROADTUBE CORRECTION EQUIVALENT(B/2)= 13688 (C) FACTOR(A/C)= 0.948 %TOTAL HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 HOURK-FACTOR VOLUME : 645 HOUR HOUR TRUCK % (PEAK/AADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 2013/07/2412:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT (65A-1) (65A-2) TRUCKS(TYPE 4-7) 221 34.26% 1897 31.10% 10.57% COMBINATION (6513-1) 6100 (6513-2) (TYPE 8-13) 8 1.24% 19 0.31% 10.57% Traffic Data Service �\ Traffic Station Sketch N Island:Hawaii Area:Kona Section ID/Station#: B71018600408 Laaloa Avenue D2 4 Alii Drive ------------------------------- ----------------------- D1 10 1 Queen Kalama Avenue Meter# File Name GPS 1. CH58 D0309007 B71018600408 19.58884,-155.9715 D0309008_B71018600408 Station Description: Alii Drive: Laaloa Avenue to Queen Kalama Avenue Survey Beginning Date/Time: Survey Ending Date/Time: 3/9/14 @ 0000 3/10/14@ 2400 Survey Method: Road Tube Data Type: Class Survey Crew: LM C1B Sketch Updated: By: SR Remarks: 1346 FACILITY NAME JURI FUNC AREA ROUTE CLASS TYPE NO. MILE Alii Drive 17 0186 D 1=Direction to End D 1:Queen Kalama Avenue/Mamalahoa Bypass D2=Direction to Begin D2:Laaloa Avenue/Kuakini Highway Run Date:2015/03/16 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2014 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 6300 Functional Class:URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 186 Location: Alii Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 03/10/2014 12:00-12:15 2 7 9 06:00-06:15 14 5 19 12:00-12:15 64 61 125 06:00-06:15 57 60 117 12:15-12:30 3 0 3 06:15-06:30 13 24 37 12:15-12:30 53 69 122 06:15-06:30 57 49 106 12:30-12:45 2 1 3 06:30-06:45 18 33 51 12:30-12:45 55 52 107 06:30-06:45 56 46 102 12:45-01:00 0 1 1 06:45-07:00 34 29 63 12:45-01:00 59 65 124 06:45-07:00 51 52 103 01:00-01:15 3 3 6 07:00-07:15 27 39 66 01:00-01:15 64 54 118 07:00-07:15 39 48 87 01:15-01:30 3 0 3 07:15-07:30 42 38 80 01:15-01:30 63 52 115 07:15-07:30 41 37 78 01:30-01:45 3 1 4 07:30-07:45 74 40 114 01:30-01:45 70 72 142 07:30-07:45 23 35 58 01:45-02:00 3 3 6 07:45-08:00 61 46 107 01:45-02:00 65 80 145 07:45-08:00 29 35 64 02:00-02:15 1 1 2 08:00-08:15 57 44 101 02:00-02:15 77 59 136 08:00-08:15 26 26 52 02:15-02:30 2 1 3 08:15-08:30 38 58 96 02:15-02:30 58 67 125 08:15-08:30 29 33 62 02:30-02:45 2 0 2 08:30-08:45 48 54 102 02:30-02:45 77 59 136 08:30-08:45 35 20 55 02:45-03:00 0 1 1 08:45-09:00 53 44 97 02:45-03:00 66 56 122 08:45-09:00 25 21 46 03:00-03:15 3 1 4 09:00-09:15 45 58 103 03:00-03:15 56 76 132 09:00-09:15 29 16 45 03:15-03:30 2 1 3 09:15-09:30 54 51 105 03:15-03:30 67 70 137 09:15-09:30 22 13 35 03:30-03:45 0 1 1 09:30-09:45 51 46 97 03:30-03:45 65 81 146 09:30-09:45 20 16 36 03:45-04:00 2 1 3 09:45-10:00 55 42 97 03:45-04:00 85 68 153 09:45-10:00 15 14 29 04:00-04:15 1 3 4 10:00-10:15 60 69 129 04:00-04:15 64 65 129 10:00-10:15 19 15 34 04:15-04:30 1 1 2 10:15-10:30 50 76 126 04:15-04:30 69 70 139 10:15-10:30 12 15 27 04:30-04:45 1 2 3 10:30-10:45 61 60 121 04:30-04:45 80 59 139 10:30-10:45 17 8 25 04:45-05:00 5 4 9 10:45-11:00 62 55 117 04:45-05:00 72 64 136 10:45-11:00 5 5 10 05:00-05:15 4 6 10 11:00-11:15 56 58 114 05:00-05:15 71 54 125 11:00-11:15 8 5 13 05:15-05:30 4 4 8 11:15-11:30 57 62 119 05:15-05:30 79 60 139 11:15-11:30 4 7 11 05:30-05:45 6 9 15 11:30-11:45 47 66 113 05:30-05:45 59 61 120 11:30-11:45 2 4 6 05:45-06:00 17 8 25 11:45-12:00 53 58 111 05:45-06:00 77 53 130 11:45-12:00 3 5 8 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 230 188 418 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 273 295 568 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.18 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.39 AM-D(%) 55.02 44.98 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.06 51.94 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM 07:45 AM to 08:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:30 PM to 05:30 PM 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 234 202 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 302 295 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 233 260 493 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 273 295 568 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.29 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.39 AM-D(%) 47.26 52.74 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.06 51.94 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,130 1,155 2,285 PEAK HR TIME 01:30 PM to 02:30 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,200 1,215 2,415 PEAK HR VOLUME 270 278 548 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 1,615 1,527 3,142 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,239 2,112 4,351 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 01:30 PM to 02:30 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 3,439 3,327 6,766 PEAK HR VOLUME 278 278 D(%) 50.83 49.17 100.00 Run Date:2015/03/16 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2014 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 6300 Functional Class:URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 186 Location: Alii Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 03/11/2014 12:00-12:15 7 3 10 06:00-06:15 15 9 24 12:00-12:15 52 55 107 06:00-06:15 51 46 97 12:15-12:30 2 1 3 06:15-06:30 14 24 38 12:15-12:30 44 70 114 06:15-06:30 45 42 87 12:30-12:45 1 1 2 06:30-06:45 20 25 45 12:30-12:45 63 63 126 06:30-06:45 46 50 96 12:45-01:00 4 0 4 06:45-07:00 38 26 64 12:45-01:00 68 70 138 06:45-07:00 47 42 89 01:00-01:15 0 1 1 07:00-07:15 34 39 73 01:00-01:15 55 66 121 07:00-07:15 41 37 78 01:15-01:30 0 1 1 07:15-07:30 46 54 100 01:15-01:30 55 58 113 07:15-07:30 31 35 66 01:30-01:45 4 1 5 07:30-07:45 63 49 112 01:30-01:45 72 82 154 07:30-07:45 38 33 71 01:45-02:00 3 0 3 07:45-08:00 74 45 119 01:45-02:00 58 60 118 07:45-08:00 38 26 64 02:00-02:15 0 0 0 08:00-08:15 53 46 99 02:00-02:15 71 69 140 08:00-08:15 44 18 62 02:15-02:30 2 1 3 08:15-08:30 44 60 104 02:15-02:30 62 65 127 08:15-08:30 32 23 55 02:30-02:45 0 1 1 08:30-08:45 45 46 91 02:30-02:45 69 59 128 08:30-08:45 27 20 47 02:45-03:00 1 0 1 08:45-09:00 50 60 110 02:45-03:00 88 53 141 08:45-09:00 32 26 58 03:00-03:15 1 1 2 09:00-09:15 56 56 112 03:00-03:15 71 49 120 09:00-09:15 23 37 60 03:15-03:30 2 0 2 09:15-09:30 50 52 102 03:15-03:30 67 76 143 09:15-09:30 29 21 50 03:30-03:45 1 0 1 09:30-09:45 61 39 100 03:30-03:45 75 70 145 09:30-09:45 12 16 28 03:45-04:00 1 2 3 09:45-10:00 68 66 134 03:45-04:00 57 73 130 09:45-10:00 13 17 30 04:00-04:15 0 4 4 10:00-10:15 60 66 126 04:00-04:15 62 67 129 10:00-10:15 10 12 22 04:15-04:30 3 0 3 10:15-10:30 59 55 114 04:15-04:30 73 65 138 10:15-10:30 12 11 23 04:30-04:45 4 1 5 10:30-10:45 52 61 113 04:30-04:45 69 84 153 10:30-10:45 12 8 20 04:45-05:00 4 3 7 10:45-11:00 57 51 108 04:45-05:00 78 52 130 10:45-11:00 9 9 18 05:00-05:15 2 8 10 11:00-11:15 65 65 130 05:00-05:15 65 63 128 11:00-11:15 13 5 18 05:15-05:30 4 6 10 11:15-11:30 55 59 114 05:15-05:30 88 63 151 11:15-11:30 5 6 11 05:30-05:45 9 18 27 11:30-11:45 66 52 118 05:30-05:45 79 69 148 11:30-11:45 5 4 9 05:45-06:00 11 3 14 11:45-12:00 68 62 130 05:45-06:00 53 50 103 11:45-12:00 8 2 10 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:30 PM to 05:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 234 200 434 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 300 262 562 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.37 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.25 AM-D(%) 53.92 46.08 100.00 PM-D(%) 53.38 46.62 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 236 212 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 310 289 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:30 PM to 05:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 254 238 492 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 300 262 562 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.22 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.25 AM-D(%) 51.63 48.37 100.00 PM-D(%) 53.38 46.62 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,213 1,167 2,380 PEAK HR TIME 01:30 PM to 02:30 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,279 1,223 2,502 PEAK HR VOLUME 263 276 539 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 1,594 1,551 3,145 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,217 2,097 4,314 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 12:45 PM to 01:45 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 3,496 3,320 6,816 PEAK HR VOLUME 290 276 D(%) 51.29 48.71 100.00 Run Date: 2015/03/20 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2014 Site ID: B71018600408 Route No: 186 Date From: 2014/03/10 0:00 Town: Hawaii Direction: +MP Date To: 2014/03/11 23:45 Location: Alii Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave Functional Classification: 17 URBAWCOLLECTOR REPORT TOTALS-48 HOURS RECORDED VOLUME % NUMBER OF AXLES Cycles 500 3.68% 1000 PC 10490 77.23% 20980 2A-4T 2325 17.12% 4650 ------------------------ ------------ LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS 13315 98.03% 26630 HEAVY VEHICLES Bus 37 0.27% 92 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 87 0.64% 174 3A-SU 57 0.42% 171 4A-SU 19 0.14% 76 SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 33 0.24% 132 5A-ST 12 0.09% 60 6A-ST 0 0.00% 0 MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 1 0.01% 5 6A-MT 12 0.09% 72 7A-MT 9 0.07% 63 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 267 1.97% 845 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 13582(A) 100.00% 27475 (B) UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 0 0.00% AXLE ROADTUBE CORRECTION EQUIVALENT(B/2)= 13738 (C) FACTOR(A/C)= 0.989 %TOTAL HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 HOURK-FACTOR VOLUME : 968 HOUR HOUR TRUCK % (PEAK/AADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 2014/03/1015:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT (65A-1) (65A-2) TRUCKS(TYPE 4-7) 10 1.76% 100 1.59% 9.02% COMBINATION (6513-1) 6300 (6513-2) (TYPE 8-13) 2 0.35% 33 0.52% 9.02% Traffic Data Service �\ Traffic Station Sketch N Island:Hawaii Area:Kona Section ID/Station#: B71018600408 Laaloa Avenue D2 4 Alii Drive ------------------------------- ----------------------- D1 10 1 Queen Kalama Avenue Meter# File Name GPS 1. CH58 D0910025 B71018600408 19.58884,-155.9715 D0910026_B71018600408 Station Description: Alii Drive: Laaloa Avenue to Queen Kalama Avenue Survey Beginning Date/Time: Survey Ending Date/Time: 9/10/15@ 0000 9/11/15@ 2400 Survey Method: Road Tube Data Type: Class Survey Crew: LM C1B Sketch Updated: By: SR Remarks: 1346 FACILITY NAME JURI FUNC AREA ROUTE CLASS TYPE NO. MILE Alii Drive 17 0186 D 1=Direction to End D 1:Queen Kalama Avenue/Mamalahoa Bypass D2=Direction to Begin D2:Laaloa Avenue/Kuakini Highway Run Date:2016/05/18 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2015 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 5500 Functional Class:URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 186 Location: Alii Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 09/10/2015 12:00-12:15 4 7 11 06:00-06:15 11 11 22 12:00-12:15 52 57 109 06:00-06:15 32 42 74 12:15-12:30 5 3 8 06:15-06:30 20 15 35 12:15-12:30 50 46 96 06:15-06:30 32 34 66 12:30-12:45 4 4 8 06:30-06:45 26 27 53 12:30-12:45 42 57 99 06:30-06:45 23 39 62 12:45-01:00 1 1 2 06:45-07:00 29 25 54 12:45-01:00 59 35 94 06:45-07:00 38 34 72 01:00-01:15 1 0 1 07:00-07:15 38 32 70 01:00-01:15 50 66 116 07:00-07:15 36 35 71 01:15-01:30 2 3 5 07:15-07:30 47 64 111 01:15-01:30 50 58 108 07:15-07:30 40 28 68 01:30-01:45 0 3 3 07:30-07:45 50 52 102 01:30-01:45 63 47 110 07:30-07:45 24 17 41 01:45-02:00 1 1 2 07:45-08:00 32 59 91 01:45-02:00 57 48 105 07:45-08:00 23 29 52 02:00-02:15 0 1 1 08:00-08:15 50 40 90 02:00-02:15 57 67 124 08:00-08:15 18 24 42 02:15-02:30 1 0 1 08:15-08:30 38 41 79 02:15-02:30 50 49 99 08:15-08:30 27 25 52 02:30-02:45 0 0 0 08:30-08:45 41 38 79 02:30-02:45 45 52 97 08:30-08:45 18 20 38 02:45-03:00 2 3 5 08:45-09:00 47 52 99 02:45-03:00 56 45 101 08:45-09:00 19 19 38 03:00-03:15 0 2 2 09:00-09:15 41 52 93 03:00-03:15 50 58 108 09:00-09:15 33 14 47 03:15-03:30 0 2 2 09:15-09:30 51 50 101 03:15-03:30 44 81 125 09:15-09:30 6 19 25 03:30-03:45 2 2 4 09:30-09:45 44 40 84 03:30-03:45 64 60 124 09:30-09:45 12 27 39 03:45-04:00 5 0 5 09:45-10:00 41 38 79 03:45-04:00 60 68 128 09:45-10:00 8 13 21 04:00-04:15 1 4 5 10:00-10:15 55 54 109 04:00-04:15 50 69 119 10:00-10:15 11 12 23 04:15-04:30 1 3 4 10:15-10:30 46 41 87 04:15-04:30 49 80 129 10:15-10:30 18 10 28 04:30-04:45 4 1 5 10:30-10:45 54 43 97 04:30-04:45 55 68 123 10:30-10:45 13 11 24 04:45-05:00 2 3 5 10:45-11:00 54 46 100 04:45-05:00 51 66 117 10:45-11:00 5 9 14 05:00-05:15 7 2 9 11:00-11:15 54 40 94 05:00-05:15 46 78 124 11:00-11:15 17 5 22 05:15-05:30 11 5 16 11:15-11:30 52 53 105 05:15-05:30 33 76 109 11:15-11:30 13 11 24 05:30-05:45 8 8 16 11:30-11:45 58 42 100 05:30-05:45 43 46 89 11:30-11:45 7 11 18 05:45-06:00 12 6 18 11:45-12:00 44 36 80 05:45-06:00 59 57 116 11:45-12:00 3 5 8 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 179 215 394 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 223 277 500 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.80 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.64 AM-D(%) 45.43 54.57 100.00 PM-D(%) 44.60 55.40 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15AM 07:15 AM to 08:15AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM 04:15 PM to 05:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 179 215 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 223 292 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 10:45 AM to 11:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 218 181 399 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 223 277 500 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.89 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.64 AM-D(%) 54.64 45.36 100.00 PM-D(%) 44.60 55.40 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,023 991 2,014 PEAK HR TIME 01:15 PM to 02:15 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,097 1,055 2,152 PEAK HR VOLUME 227 220 447 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 1,235 1,434 2,669 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 1,711 1,927 3,638 PEAK HR TIME 01:15 PM to 02:15 PM 01:15 PM to 02:15 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 2,808 2,982 5,790 PEAK HR VOLUME 227 220 D(%) 48.50 51.50 100.00 Run Date:2016/05/18 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2015 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 5500 Functional Class:URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 186 Location: Alii Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 09/11/2015 12:00-12:15 4 3 7 06:00-06:15 12 11 23 12:00-12:15 38 52 90 06:00-06:15 48 59 107 12:15-12:30 6 2 8 06:15-06:30 20 17 37 12:15-12:30 58 45 103 06:15-06:30 31 54 85 12:30-12:45 4 2 6 06:30-06:45 22 18 40 12:30-12:45 52 41 93 06:30-06:45 40 37 77 12:45-01:00 3 2 5 06:45-07:00 29 25 54 12:45-01:00 51 54 105 06:45-07:00 31 41 72 01:00-01:15 4 1 5 07:00-07:15 37 22 59 01:00-01:15 51 46 97 07:00-07:15 24 33 57 01:15-01:30 2 2 4 07:15-07:30 45 38 83 01:15-01:30 58 36 94 07:15-07:30 26 23 49 01:30-01:45 2 2 4 07:30-07:45 54 48 102 01:30-01:45 57 49 106 07:30-07:45 22 29 51 01:45-02:00 1 1 2 07:45-08:00 49 56 105 01:45-02:00 51 48 99 07:45-08:00 22 29 51 02:00-02:15 0 0 0 08:00-08:15 55 31 86 02:00-02:15 47 56 103 08:00-08:15 15 26 41 02:15-02:30 3 0 3 08:15-08:30 45 36 81 02:15-02:30 54 54 108 08:15-08:30 25 24 49 02:30-02:45 1 1 2 08:30-08:45 45 37 82 02:30-02:45 46 58 104 08:30-08:45 29 18 47 02:45-03:00 0 0 0 08:45-09:00 42 36 78 02:45-03:00 42 52 94 08:45-09:00 20 25 45 03:00-03:15 1 2 3 09:00-09:15 46 27 73 03:00-03:15 63 56 119 09:00-09:15 22 21 43 03:15-03:30 0 1 1 09:15-09:30 55 39 94 03:15-03:30 50 61 111 09:15-09:30 22 28 50 03:30-03:45 2 2 4 09:30-09:45 33 43 76 03:30-03:45 67 42 109 09:30-09:45 20 22 42 03:45-04:00 0 1 1 09:45-10:00 57 42 99 03:45-04:00 56 62 118 09:45-10:00 11 17 28 04:00-04:15 0 3 3 10:00-10:15 61 37 98 04:00-04:15 57 56 113 10:00-10:15 11 14 25 04:15-04:30 2 1 3 10:15-10:30 44 40 84 04:15-04:30 61 62 123 10:15-10:30 16 8 24 04:30-04:45 8 0 8 10:30-10:45 59 37 96 04:30-04:45 38 58 96 10:30-10:45 13 13 26 04:45-05:00 4 4 8 10:45-11:00 45 48 93 04:45-05:00 52 68 120 10:45-11:00 13 8 21 05:00-05:15 5 5 10 11:00-11:15 39 39 78 05:00-05:15 51 49 100 11:00-11:15 8 7 15 05:15-05:30 9 9 18 11:15-11:30 53 46 99 05:15-05:30 44 85 129 11:15-11:30 8 14 22 05:30-05:45 6 11 17 11:30-11:45 43 36 79 05:30-05:45 37 60 97 11:30-11:45 6 5 11 05:45-06:00 14 8 22 11:45-12:00 40 51 91 05:45-06:00 31 48 79 11:45-12:00 4 8 12 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 203 173 376 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 241 222 463 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.72 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.28 AM-D(%) 53.99 46.01 100.00 PM-D(%) 52.05 47.95 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15AM 07:15 AM to 08:15AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 203 173 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 241 262 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 09:45 AM to 10:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 221 156 377 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 241 222 463 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.74 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.28 AM-D(%) 58.62 41.38 100.00 PM-D(%) 52.05 47.95 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,030 860 1,890 PEAK HR TIME 01:30 PM to 02:30 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,111 923 2,034 PEAK HR VOLUME 209 207 416 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 1,212 1,298 2,510 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 1,699 1,861 3,560 PEAK HR TIME 09:45 AM to 10:45 AM 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 2,810 2,784 5,594 PEAK HR VOLUME 221 220 D(%) 50.23 49.77 100.00 Run Date: 2016/05/19 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2015 Site ID: B71018600408 Route No: 186 Date From: 2015/09/10 0:00 Town: Hawaii Direction: +MP Date To: 2015/09/11 23:45 Location: Alii Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave Functional Classification: 17 URBAWCOLLECTOR REPORT TOTALS-48 HOURS RECORDED VOLUME % NUMBER OF AXLES Cycles 213 1.87% 426 PC 9633 84.62% 19266 2A-4T 1342 11.79% 2684 ------------------------ ------------ LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS 11188 98.28% 22376 HEAVY VEHICLES Bus 39 0.34% 98 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 75 0.66% 150 3A-SU 39 0.34% 117 4A-SU 12 0.11% 48 SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 15 0.13% 60 5A-ST 0 0.00% 0 6A-ST 2 0.02% 12 MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 1 0.01% 5 6A-MT 9 0.08% 54 7A-MT 4 0.04% 28 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 196 1.72% 572 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 11384(A) 100.00% 22947 (B) UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 0 0.00% AXLE ROADTUBE CORRECTION EQUIVALENT(B/2)= 11474 (C) FACTOR(A/C)= 0.992 %TOTAL HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 HOURK-FACTOR VOLUME : 488 HOUR HOUR TRUCK % (PEAK/AADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 2015/09/1016:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT (65A-1) (65A-2) TRUCKS(TYPE 4-7) 4 0.82% 82 1.49% 8.87% COMBINATION (6513-1) 5500 (6513-2) (TYPE 8-13) 0 0.00% 15 0.27% 8.87% Traffic Data Service �\ Traffic Station Sketch N Island:Hawaii Area:Kona Section ID/Station#: B71018600408 Laaloa Avenue D2 Alii Drive -------------------------------- -------------------------- DI ------------------------------- -------------------------D1 10 1 Queen Kalama Avenue Meter# File Name GPS 1. CH58 D0427037_B71018600408 19.58884,-155.9715 D0427038_B71018600408 Station Description: Alii Drive: Laaloa Avenue to Queen Kalama Avenue Survey Beginning Date/Time: Survey Ending Date/Time: 4/27/16@ 0000 4/28/16@ 2400 Survey Method: Road Tube Data Type: Class Survey Crew: LM C1B Sketch Updated: By: SR Remarks: 1346 FACILITY NAME JURI FDNC AREA ROUTE CLASS TYPE NO. MILE Alii Drive 17 0186 D1=Direction to End Dl:Queen Kalama Avenue/Mamalahoa Bypass D2=Direction to Begin D2:Laaloa Avenue/Kuakini Highway Run Date:2017/08/09 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2016 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 6600 Functional Class:URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 186 Location: AN Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 04/27/2016 12:00-12:15 2 1 3 06:00-06:15 15 16 31 12:00-12:15 71 66 137 06:00-06:15 41 57 98 12:15-12:30 4 2 6 06:15-06:30 18 13 31 12:15-12:30 59 64 123 06:15-06:30 60 47 107 12:30-12:45 1 0 1 06:30-06:45 25 28 53 12:30-12:45 56 67 123 06:30-06:45 41 43 84 12:45-01:00 0 3 3 06:45-07:00 36 32 68 12:45-01:00 69 67 136 06:45-07:00 37 44 81 01:00-01:15 3 0 3 07:00-07:15 47 37 84 01:00-01:15 64 59 123 07:00-07:15 37 34 71 01:15-01:30 2 1 3 07:15-07:30 56 42 98 01:15-01:30 43 64 107 07:15-07:30 46 37 83 01:30-01:45 2 4 6 07:30-07:45 50 70 120 01:30-01:45 63 69 132 07:30-07:45 13 33 46 01:45-02:00 2 1 3 07:45-08:00 47 63 110 01:45-02:00 77 54 131 07:45-08:00 21 33 54 02:00-02:15 0 2 2 08:00-08:15 65 66 131 02:00-02:15 64 68 132 08:00-08:15 26 22 48 02:15-02:30 0 1 1 08:15-08:30 48 48 96 02:15-02:30 75 59 134 08:15-08:30 15 22 37 02:30-02:45 0 1 1 08:30-08:45 67 45 112 02:30-02:45 62 76 138 08:30-08:45 13 33 46 02:45-03:00 2 2 4 08:45-09:00 43 57 100 02:45-03:00 75 73 148 08:45-09:00 22 26 48 03:00-03:15 2 0 2 09:00-09:15 47 42 89 03:00-03:15 64 81 145 09:00-09:15 20 12 32 03:15-03:30 0 1 1 09:15-09:30 49 41 90 03:15-03:30 60 74 134 09:15-09:30 16 18 34 03:30-03:45 1 1 2 09:30-09:45 46 59 105 03:30-03:45 72 71 143 09:30-09:45 21 13 34 03:45-04:00 0 1 1 09:45-10:00 47 62 109 03:45-04:00 76 71 147 09:45-10:00 18 12 30 04:00-04:15 0 1 1 10:00-10:15 64 49 113 04:00-04:15 79 83 162 10:00-10:15 13 14 27 04:15-04:30 1 4 5 10:15-10:30 49 56 105 04:15-04:30 63 79 142 10:15-10:30 10 15 25 04:30-04:45 2 3 5 10:30-10:45 58 65 123 04:30-04:45 58 81 139 10:30-10:45 15 12 27 04:45-05:00 3 4 7 10:45-11:00 58 61 119 04:45-05:00 60 67 127 10:45-11:00 12 8 20 05:00-05:15 3 5 8 11:00-11:15 64 57 121 05:00-05:15 52 69 121 11:00-11:15 9 9 18 05:15-05:30 10 7 17 11:15-11:30 59 58 117 05:15-05:30 57 62 119 11:15-11:30 3 7 10 05:30-05:45 12 15 27 11:30-11:45 66 59 125 05:30-05:45 41 63 104 11:30-11:45 0 4 4 05:45-06:00 14 12 26 11:45-12:00 53 56 109 05:45-06:00 49 53 102 11:45-12:00 4 3 7 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 218 241 459 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 290 304 594 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.83 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.84 AM-D(%) 47.49 52.51 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.82 51.18 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:45 AM to 08:45 AM 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 227 247 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 290 314 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 10:45 AM to 11:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 247 235 482 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 290 304 594 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.18 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.84 AM-D(%) 51.24 48.76 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.82 51.18 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,177 1,182 2,359 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,243 1,254 2,497 PEAK HR VOLUME 276 276 552 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 1,509 1,640 3,149 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,022 2,198 4,220 PEAK HR TIME 01:30 PM to 02:30 PM 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 3,265 3,452 6,717 PEAK HR VOLUME 279 276 D(%) 48.61 51.39 100.00 Run Date:2017/08/09 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2016 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 6600 Functional Class:URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 186 Location: AN Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 04/28/2016 12:00-12:15 4 5 9 06:00-06:15 14 24 38 12:00-12:15 49 54 103 06:00-06:15 49 56 105 12:15-12:30 2 4 6 06:15-06:30 12 21 33 12:15-12:30 67 57 124 06:15-06:30 42 39 81 12:30-12:45 2 3 5 06:30-06:45 26 24 50 12:30-12:45 60 64 124 06:30-06:45 50 41 91 12:45-01:00 4 4 8 06:45-07:00 37 20 57 12:45-01:00 60 54 114 06:45-07:00 39 53 92 01:00-01:15 0 1 1 07:00-07:15 39 36 75 01:00-01:15 58 62 120 07:00-07:15 38 37 75 01:15-01:30 0 2 2 07:15-07:30 64 41 105 01:15-01:30 47 60 107 07:15-07:30 38 26 64 01:30-01:45 1 2 3 07:30-07:45 41 74 115 01:30-01:45 58 57 115 07:30-07:45 50 36 86 01:45-02:00 2 0 2 07:45-08:00 45 57 102 01:45-02:00 62 69 131 07:45-08:00 34 28 62 02:00-02:15 1 2 3 08:00-08:15 52 47 99 02:00-02:15 53 70 123 08:00-08:15 35 32 67 02:15-02:30 3 0 3 08:15-08:30 55 42 97 02:15-02:30 67 53 120 08:15-08:30 19 20 39 02:30-02:45 2 1 3 08:30-08:45 43 51 94 02:30-02:45 69 52 121 08:30-08:45 16 22 38 02:45-03:00 0 0 0 08:45-09:00 40 55 95 02:45-03:00 64 52 116 08:45-09:00 15 32 47 03:00-03:15 1 0 1 09:00-09:15 46 45 91 03:00-03:15 58 64 122 09:00-09:15 18 28 46 03:15-03:30 1 0 1 09:15-09:30 54 55 109 03:15-03:30 62 66 128 09:15-09:30 25 19 44 03:30-03:45 1 1 2 09:30-09:45 43 50 93 03:30-03:45 78 78 156 09:30-09:45 16 24 40 03:45-04:00 0 1 1 09:45-10:00 56 46 102 03:45-04:00 75 75 150 09:45-10:00 31 20 51 04:00-04:15 0 2 2 10:00-10:15 64 52 116 04:00-04:15 52 82 134 10:00-10:15 13 10 23 04:15-04:30 3 4 7 10:15-10:30 58 47 105 04:15-04:30 57 88 145 10:15-10:30 12 18 30 04:30-04:45 0 3 3 10:30-10:45 60 56 116 04:30-04:45 59 87 146 10:30-10:45 9 8 17 04:45-05:00 4 2 6 10:45-11:00 61 40 101 04:45-05:00 68 77 145 10:45-11:00 7 7 14 05:00-05:15 7 7 14 11:00-11:15 48 55 103 05:00-05:15 56 69 125 11:00-11:15 8 9 17 05:15-05:30 7 8 15 11:15-11:30 56 57 113 05:15-05:30 56 83 139 11:15-11:30 8 6 14 05:30-05:45 8 9 17 11:30-11:45 53 63 116 05:30-05:45 49 62 111 11:30-11:45 4 9 13 05:45-06:00 14 14 28 11:45-12:00 57 61 118 05:45-06:00 63 61 124 11:45-12:00 8 1 9 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 202 219 421 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 262 323 585 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.39 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.87 AM-D(%) 47.98 52.02 100.00 PM-D(%) 44.79 55.21 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 202 220 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 273 334 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 214 236 450 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 262 323 585 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.83 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.87 AM-D(%) 47.56 52.44 100.00 PM-D(%) 44.79 55.21 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,124 1,119 2,243 PEAK HR TIME 01:45 PM to 02:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,191 1,194 2,385 PEAK HR VOLUME 251 244 495 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 1,447 1,596 3,043 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,031 2,177 4,208 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 01:15 PM to 02:15 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 3,222 3,371 6,593 PEAK HR VOLUME 253 256 D(%) 48.87 51.13 100.00 Run Date: 2017/08/09 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2016 Site ID: B71018600408 Route No: 186 Date From: 2016/04/27 0:00 Town: Hawaii Direction: +MP Date To: 2016/04/28 23:45 Location: Alii Dr-Laaloa Ave to Queen Kalama Ave Functional Classification: 17 URBAWCOLLECTOR REPORT TOTALS-48 HOURS RECORDED VOLUME % NUMBER OF AXLES Cycles 458 3.44% 916 PC 9995 75.09% 19990 2A-4T 2577 19.36% 5154 ------------------------ ------------ LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS 13030 97.90% 26060 HEAVY VEHICLES Bus 57 0.43% 142 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 138 1.04% 276 3A-SU 40 0.30% 120 4A-SU 11 0.08% 44 SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 21 0.16% 84 5A-ST 7 0.05% 35 6A-ST 0 0.00% 0 MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 2 0.02% 10 6A-MT 4 0.03% 24 7A-MT 0 0.00% 0 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 280 2.10% 735 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 13310(A) 100.00% 26795 (B) UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 0 0.00% AXLE ROADTUBE CORRECTION EQUIVALENT(B/2)= 13398 (C) FACTOR(A/C)= 0.993 %TOTAL HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 HOURK-FACTOR VOLUME : 570 HOUR HOUR TRUCK % (PEAK/AADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 2016/04/2816:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT (65A-1) (65A-2) TRUCKS(TYPE 4-7) 2 0.35% 123 1.86% 8.64% COMBINATION (6513-1) 6600 (6513-2) (TYPE 8-13) 1 0.18% 17 0.26% 8.64% 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 12-AUG-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: 671018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 7600 Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 186 Location: DATE: 07-AUG-17 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 08:00 AM to 09:00 PM-PEAK HR TIME 5:30 PM to 6:30 AM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 218 253 471 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 386 324 710 AM-K FACTOR(%) 5.75 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.67 AM-D(%) 46.28 53.72 100 PM-D(%) 54.37 45.63 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK 08:00 AM to 09:00 08:00 AM to 09:00 5:30 PM to 6:30 4:15 PM to 5:15 AM-PEAK HRTIME AM AM PM-PEAK HR TIME PM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 218 253 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 386 327 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 10:15 AM to 11:15 PM-PEAK HR TIME 5:30 PM to 6:30 AM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 266 266 532 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 386 386 710 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.5 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.67 AM-D(%) 46.28 53.72 100 PM-D(%) 54.37 45.63 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,067 1,257 2,324 PEAK HR TIME 2:00 PM to 3:00 AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,155 1,327 2,482 PM PEAK HR VOLUME 288 303 591 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 1,898 1,799 3,697 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,939 2,769 5,708 PEAK HR TIME 2:00 PM to 3:00 1:30 PM to 2:30 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 4,094 4,096 8,190 PM PM PEAK HR VOLUME 288 305 D% 49.99 50.01 100 TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 8 12 20 - 4 10 14 - 62 71 133 - 95 77 172 12:15 _ 06:15 12:15 06:15 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:RP P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:32939,7 1/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 12:15 06:15 � 12:15 � 1 � � 06:15 I 12 5 17 - 6 6 12 - 75 59 134 - 90 91 181 12:30 06:30 1230 06:30 12:30 06:30 1230 06:30 2 5 7 - 8 15 23 - 71 76 147 - 70 66 136 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 9 3 12 - 5 15 20 - 69 69 138 - 67 60 127 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 4 5 9 - 31 14 45 - 67 66 133 - 68 62 130 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 4 9 13 - 12 41 53 - 66 75 141 - 75 79 154 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 6 3 9 - 24 54 78 - 78 90 168 - 61 57 118 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 4 3 7 - 45 48 93 - 61 65 126 - 53 38 91 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 3 1 4 - 39 61 100 - 70 63 133 - 52 60 112 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:30 5 0 5 08:30- 58 68 126 f - 76 87 163 - 34 64 98 1 � 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 0 3 3 - 61 58 119 - 72 83 155 - 47 38 85 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 0 0 0 - 60 66 126 - 70 70 140 - 29 37 66 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 1 3 4 - 54 72 126 - 82 80 162 - 44 30 74 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 3 1 4 - 60 70 130 - 86 70 156 - 28 29 57 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 3 2 5 - 51 57 108 - 77 69 146 - 30 27 57 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:RP P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:32939,7 2/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 03:45 09:45 I I I 03:45 I I I 09:45 1 0 1 - 60 61 121 - 84 74 158 - 36 31 67 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 2 1 3 - 48 54 102 - 74 76 150 - 31 24 55 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 0 1 1 - 75 65 140 - 84 77 161 - 29 14 43 04:30 10:30 04:30 I 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 1 1 2 - 59 74 133 - 88 88 176 - 32 22 54 04:45 10:45 04:45 I 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 3 0 3 - 67 63 130 - 104 82 186 - 21 23 44 05:00 11:00 05:00 1100 0500 11:00 05:00 11:00 2 2 4 - 65 64 129 - 94 80 174 - 15 12 27 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 6 4 10 - 48 64 112 - 87 73 160 - 13 10 23 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 3 2 5 - 56 78 134 - 100 79 179 - 12 8 20 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 6 4 10 - 71 79 150 - 101 77 178 - 9 11 20 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R P:P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:32939,7 3/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 12-AUG-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: 671018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 7600 Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 186 Location: DATE: 08-AUG-17 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 08:00 AM to 09:00 PM-PEAK HR TIME 4:15 PM to 5:15 AM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 218 249 467 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 331 376 707 AM-K FACTOR(%) 5.76 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.72 AM-D(%) 46.68 53.32 100 PM-D(%) 46.82 53.18 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:45 AM to 08:45 08:00 AM to 09:00 3:15 PM to 4:15 4:15 PM to 5:15 AM-PEAK HRTIME AM AM PM-PEAK HR TIME PM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 219 249 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 359 376 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 10:45 AM to 11:45 PM-PEAK HR TIME 4:15 PM to 5:15 AM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 246 254 531 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 331 364 707 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.55 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.72 AM-D(%) 46.68 53.32 100 PM-D(%) 46.82 53.18 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,087 1,255 2,342 PEAK HR TIME 0:15 PM to 1P� AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,169 1,331 2,500 PEAK HR VOLUME 271 298 569 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 1,864 1,839 3,703 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,913 2,699 5,612 PEAK HR TIME 1:00 PM to 2:00 0:15 PM to 1:15 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 4,082 4,030 8,112 PM PM PEAK HR VOLUME 285 298 D% 50.32 49.68 100 TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 9 6 15 - 6 10 16 - 65 58 123 - 84 71 155 12:15 _ 06:15 12:15 06:15 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:RP P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:32939,8 1/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 12:15 06:15 � 12:15 � 06:15 I 13 6 19 - 9 5 14 - 72 86 158 - 106 71 177 12:30 06:30 1230 06:30 12:30 06:30 1230 06:30 8 5 13 - 11 14 25 - 72 73 145 - 70 81 151 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 5 6 11 - 7 15 22 - 59 68 127 - 76 55 131 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 6 6 12 - 24 30 54 - 68 71 139 - 76 58 134 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 5 2 7 - 21 40 61 - 67 75 142 - 53 59 112 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 2 7 9 - 37 52 89 - 76 65 141 - 51 45 96 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 2 2 4 - 43 43 86 - 74 71 145 - 50 42 92 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 4 1 5 - 44 46 90 - 66 75 141 - 56 48 104 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 0 2 2 - 62 53 115 - 64 70 134 - 42 39 81 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 2 4 6 - 70 75 145 - 68 69 137 - 43 37 80 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 5 1 6 - 42 75 117 - 84 67 151 - 29 31 60 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 3 3 6 - 56 64 120 - 87 61 148 - 36 24 60 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 2 1 3 - 55 76 131 - 101 73 174 - 31 29 60 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 1 2 3 - 64 67 131 - 92 75 167 - 34 20 54 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R P:P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:32939,8 2/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 03:45 09:45 I I I 03:45 I I I 09:45 1 2 3 - 57 55 112 - 76 78 154 - 37 17 54 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 2 0 2 - 59 69 128 - 90 84 174 - 41 19 60 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 1 1 2 - 57 45 102 - 88 86 174 - 40 17 57 04:30 10:30 04:30 I 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 0 3 3 - 52 69 121 - 88 87 175 - 22 14 36 04:45 10:45 04:45 I 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 0 0 0 - 57 79 136 - 77 104 181 - 22 31 53 05:00 11:00 05:00 1100 0500 11:00 05:00 11:00 2 2 4 - 56 65 121 - 78 99 177 - 21 19 40 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 2 2 4 - 57 75 132 - 95 73 168 - 15 11 26 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 4 6 10 - 76 66 142 - 67 96 163 - 6 10 16 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 3 6 9 - 65 67 132 - 90 75 165 - 8 12 20 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R P:P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:32939,8 3/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 12-AUG-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: 671018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 8600 Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 186 Location: DATE: 08-JAN-19 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:30 to 08:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 to 05:00 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 398 251 649 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 385 421 806 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.07 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.78 AM-D(%) 61.33 38.67 100 PM-D(%) 47.77 52.23 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:45 to 08:45 AM 07:00 to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 to 04:00 PM 05:15 to 06:15 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 414 272 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 404 451 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 11:30 to 12:30 PM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 to 05:00 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 367 414 701 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 385 404 806 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.64 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.78 AM-D(%) 61.33 38.67 100 PM-D(%) 47.77 52.23 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,822 1,383 3,205 PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,899 1,459 3,358 PEAK HR VOLUME 391 388 779 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 2,165 2,261 4,426 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,760 3,060 5,820 PEAK HR TIME 01:00 to 02:00 PM 02:45 to 03:45 PM 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 4,659 4,519 9,178 PEAK HR VOLUME 392 388 D% 50.76 49.24 100 TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 1 8 9 - 14 14 28 - 100 79 179 - 68 105 173 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 - 6 7 13 - 28 11 39 - 98 89 187 - 48 91 139 12:30 ` 06:30 I 12:30 1 1 1 06:30 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R PPPP8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:38206,8 1/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 12:30 06:30 12:30 06:30 3 4 7 - 29 15 44 - 73 73 146 - 59 87 146 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 0 3 3 - 42 30 72 - 68 78 146 - 37 58 95 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 3 5 8 - 67 54 121 - 89 99 188 - 48 35 83 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 2 1 3 - 72 67 139 - 98 78 176 - 35 38 73 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 - 2 1 3 - 72 76 148 - 104 69 173 - 45 37 82 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 2 2 4 - 101 75 176 - 101 91 192 - 35 36 71 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 2 2 4 - 93 53 146 - 79 86 165 - 23 38 61 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 0 1 1 - 132 47 179 - 83 91 174 - 27 28 55 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 0230 08:30 1 1 2 - 88 50 138 - 92 96 188 - 16 45 61 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 1 1 2 - 80 66 146 - 94 77 171 - 20 30 50 0300 09:00 03:00 09:00 0300 09:00 03:00 09:00 0 2 2 - 92 53 145 - 99 91 190 - 19 29 48 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 1 0 1 - 65 55 120 - 99 123 222 - 22 27 49 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 1 0 1 - 79 58 137 - 99 97 196 - 18 24 42 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 2 0 2 - 82 53 135 - 107 74 181 - 27 17 44 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:RP P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:38206,8 2/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 2 1 3 - 77 64 141 - 95 109 204 - 10 15 25 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 1 2 3 - 96 66 162 88 98 186 - 14 9 23 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 3 4 7 - 73 65 138 - 105 112 217 - 4 15 19 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 4 5 9 - 90 74 164 - 97 102 199 - 5 7 12 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 10 4 14 - 102 96 198 - 87 103 190 - 8 7 15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 4 4 8 - 79 75 154 - 75 114 189 - 3 12 15 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 10 10 20 - 81 87 168 - 75 119 194 - 2 3 5 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 16 8 24 - 88 79 167 - 60 113 173 - 2 6 8 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R P:P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:38206,8 3/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 12-AUG-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: 671018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 8600 Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 186 Location: DATE: 09-JAN-19 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:30 to 08:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 to 05:00 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 357 263 620 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 403 513 916 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.51 PM-K FACTOR(%) 9.61 AM-D(%) 57.58 42.42 100 PM-D(%) 44 56 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:30 to 08:30 AM 08:45 to 09:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:45 to 04:45 PM 04:00 to 05:00 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 357 269 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 405 513 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 11:30 to 12:30 PM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 to 05:00 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 368 388 725 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 403 413 916 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.61 PM-K FACTOR(%) 9.61 AM-D(%) 57.58 42.42 100 PM-D(%) 44 56 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,841 1,505 3,346 PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,923 1,563 3,486 PEAK HR VOLUME 379 429 808 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 2,214 2,431 4,645 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,843 3,198 6,041 PEAK HR TIME 01:45 to 02:45 PM 02:45 to 03:45 PM 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 4,766 4,761 9,527 PEAK HR VOLUME 413 429 D% 50.03 49.97 100 TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 6 2 8 - 19 12 31 - 87 102 189 - 64 94 158 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 - 6 2 8 - 27 14 41 - 101 76 177 - 64 80 144 12:30 ` 06:30 I 12:30 1 06:30 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R PPPP8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:38206,9 1/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 12:30 06:30 12:30 06:30 3 2 5 - 36 20 56 - 105 85 190 - 57 78 135 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 4 2 6 - 46 25 71 - 87 92 179 - 58 58 116 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 2 2 4 - 71 45 116 - 81 102 183 - 49 55 104 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 1 1 2 - 80 58 138 - 77 87 164 - 35 41 76 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 - 0 4 4 - 100 55 155 - 83 83 166 - 44 32 76 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 3 3 6 - 76 73 149 - 116 79 195 - 34 30 64 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 1 0 1 - 96 66 162 - 101 82 183 - 22 28 50 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 3 3 6 - 85 69 154 - 112 94 206 - 27 37 64 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 0230 08:30 0 4 4 - 88 54 142 - 84 86 170 - 21 27 48 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 1 0 1 - 64 67 131 - 111 97 208 - 26 30 56 0300 09:00 03:00 09:00 0300 09:00 03:00 09:00 1 0 1 - 63 65 128 - 93 110 203 - 18 30 48 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 0 0 0 - 87 72 159 - 93 115 208 - 20 28 48 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 2 2 4 - 73 65 138 - 82 107 189 - 19 16 35 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 1 0 - 81 80 161 - 96 95 191 - —12 22 34 04:00 1000 04:00 I 10:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R P:P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:38206,9 2/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 3 3 6 - 100 79 179 - 114 120 234 - 12 14 26 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 2 1 3 - 124 89 213 92 131 223 - 14 14 28 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 4 3 7 - 82 72 154 - 103 118 221 - 4 11 15 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 6 2 8 - 82 86 168 - 94 144 238 - 9 14 23 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 7 3 10 - 83 83 166 - 110 108 218 - 7 9 16 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 6 4 10 - 98 77 175 - 69 118 187 - 7 6 13 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 9 8 17 - 102 96 198 - 62 105 167 - 2 4 6 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 11 7 18 - 78 83 161 - 61 95 156 - 4 9 13 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R P:P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:38206,9 3/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 12-AUG-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: 671018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 6400 Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 186 Location: DATE: 21-DEC-20 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 08:45 to 09:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:15 to 05:15 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 260 264 524 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 415 325 740 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.3 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.9 AM-D(%) 49.62 50.38 100 PM-D(%) 56.08 43.92 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 08:45 to 09:45 AM 08:45 to 09:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 to 05:00 PM 04:30 to 05:30 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 260 264 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 419 327 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 10:15 to 11:15 AM PM-PEAKHRTIME 04:15 to 05:15 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 317 399 716 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 415 325 740 AM-K FACTOR(%) 8.61 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.9 AM-D(%) 49.62 50.38 100 PM-D(%) 56.08 43.92 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,332 1,603 2,935 PEAK HR TIME 10:15 to 11:15 AM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,386 1,676 3,062 PEAK HR VOLUME 317 399 716 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 2,159 1,895 4,054 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,823 2,434 5,257 PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM 10:15 to 11:15 AM 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 4,209 4,110 8,319 PEAK HR VOLUME 379 399 D% 50.6 49.4 100 TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 2 3 5 - 20 17 37 - 82 81 163 - 90 53 143 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 - 4 3 7 - 16 20 36 - 81 84 165 - 82 76 158 12:30 ` 06:30 I 12:30 1 06:30 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R PPPP8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAYA4705,21 1/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 12:30 06:30 12:30 06:30 5 0 5 - 20 34 54 - 74 69 143 - 53 40 93 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 3 4 7 - 29 39 68 - 91 102 193 - 63 38 101 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 6 1 7 - 38 43 81 - 76 79 155 - 36 38 74 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 3 0 3 - 42 50 92 - 75 77 152 - 24 25 49 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 - 1 5 6 - 41 60 101 - 78 82 160 - 41 40 81 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 1 1 2 - 49 58 107 - 76 79 155 - 26 20 46 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 1 2 3 - 47 67 114 - 86 70 156 - 30 30 60 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 1 0 1 - 48 57 105 - 89 89 178 - 30 17 47 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 0230 08:30 2 3 5 - 44 59 103 - 88 70 158 - 23 21 44 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 1 1 2 - 61 62 123 - 83 86 169 - 16 11 27 0300 09:00 03:00 09:00 0300 09:00 03:00 09:00 0 1 1 - 69 65 134 - 100 72 172 - 17 26 43 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 0 1 1 - 64 63 127 - 92 67 159 - 14 13 27 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 0 1 1 - 66 74 140 - 104 83 187 - 25 13 38 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 2 0 2 - 63 90 153 - 93 82 175 - 18 16 34 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:RP P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:44705,21 2/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 0 1 1 - 57 82 139 - 99 82 181 - 13 10 23 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 1 2 3 - 82 88 170 106 70 176 - 13 5 18 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 2 2 4 - 79 97 176 - 101 91 192 - 9 13 22 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 3 5 8 - 81 124 205 - 113 77 190 - 10 11 21 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 3 5 8 - 75 90 165 - 95 87 182 - 12 9 21 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 2 10 12 - 85 84 169 - 90 72 162 - 7 6 13 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 3 12 15 - 74 97 171 - 106 68 174 - 7 4 11 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 8 10 18 - 82 83 165 - 81 76 157 - 5 4 9 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R P:P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:44705,21 3/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R P:P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:44705,21 4/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 12-AUG-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: 671018600408 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 6400 Functional Class: URBAN:COLLECTOR Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 186 Location: DATE: 22-DEC-20 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 08:45 to 09:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 204 302 506 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 463 349 812 AM-K FACTOR(%) 5.98 PM-K FACTOR(%) 9.6 AM-D(%) 40.32 59.68 100 PM-D(%) 57.02 42.98 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 08:45 to 09:45 AM 08:45 to 09:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:45 to 04:45 PM 03:00 to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 204 302 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 472 379 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 11:00 to 12:00 PM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 334 344 678 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 463 349 812 AM-K FACTOR(%) 8.02 PM-K FACTOR(%) 9.6 AM-D(%) 40.32 59.68 100 PM-D(%) 57.02 42.98 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 1,285 1,534 2,819 PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 1,347 1,603 2,950 PEAK HR VOLUME 360 365 725 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 2,310 1,969 4,279 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 2,988 2,517 5,505 PEAK HR TIME 01:15 to 02:15 PM 02:45 to 03:45 PM 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 4,335 4,120 8,455 PEAK HR VOLUME 381 365 D% 51.27 48.73 100 TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 6 4 10 - 11 24 35 - 71 86 157 - 105 76 181 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 - 3 1 4 - 20 18 38 - 71 86 157 - 65 74 139 12:30 ` 06:30 I 12:30 1 06:30 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R PPPP8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAYA4705,22 1/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 12:30 06:30 12:30 06:30 3 1 4 - 19 44 63 - 86 81 167 - 55 53 108 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 4 3 7 - 39 31 70 - 85 77 162 - 36 37 73 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 1 2 3 - 33 48 81 - 75 91 166 - 40 31 71 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 1 5 6 - 44 61 105 - 111 84 195 - 37 26 63 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 - 1 0 1 - 54 51 105 - 97 65 162 - 36 26 62 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 0 3 3 - 41 60 101 - 84 77 161 - 28 17 45 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 3 2 5 - 47 58 105 - 89 77 166 - 29 14 43 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 1 1 2 - 43 62 105 - 83 75 158 - 25 27 52 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 0230 08:30 1 2 3 - 55 62 117 - 81 80 161 - 26 22 48 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 1 0 1 - 49 60 109 - 71 80 151 - 34 13 47 0300 09:00 03:00 09:00 0300 09:00 03:00 09:00 2 1 3 - 50 68 118 - 103 104 207 - 33 20 53 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 1 1 2 - 46 98 144 - 80 77 157 - 17 16 33 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 1 2 3 - 59 76 135 - 106 104 210 - 19 21 40 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 1 1 2 - 57 85 142 - 119 94 213 - 20 13 33 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:RP P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:44705,22 2/4 8/12/2021 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 4 1 5 - 65 65 130 - 122 77 199 - 17 11 28 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 0 2 2 - 70 73 143 116 74 190 - 10 12 22 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 3 3 6 - 76 79 155 - 115 89 204 - 9 12 21 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 3 1 4 - 73 67 140 - 114 81 195 - 11 11 22 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 1 3 4 - 82 100 182 - 110 84 194 - 5 4 9 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 3 5 8 - 79 80 159 - 108 76 184 - 8 7 15 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 9 13 22 - 78 80 158 - 114 85 199 - 6 2 8 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 9 12 21 - 95 84 179 - 99 65 164 - 7 3 10 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:816404468429::NO:R P:P8_COUNT_N UM BER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:44705,22 3/4 1 Traffic Data Service Traffic Station Sketch N Island:Hawaii Area:Holualoa Section ID/Station#:B71001111842 Nalani St D2 4 Kuakini Hwy ------------------------------- ----------------------- D1 10 1 Lako St Meter# File Name GPS 1. bt29 D0310013 B71001111842 19.61076,-155.9657 D0310014 671001111842 Station Description: Kuakini Hwy: Nalani St to Lako St Survey Beginning Date/Time: Survey Ending Date/Time: 3/10/14 @ 0000 3/11/14 @ 2400 Survey Method: Road Tube Data Type: Class Survey Crew: LM C1B Sketch Updated: By: SR Remarks: FACILITY NAME JURI FUNC AREA ROUTE CLASS TYPE NO. MILE Kuakini Hwy 14 11 D1=Direction to End D1:Lako St/Palani Rd(Rte 190) D2=Direction to Begin D2:Nalani St/Kamehameha Ave(Rte 19) Run Date:2015/03/09 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2014 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 22900 Functional Class:URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 11 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 03/10/2014 12:00-12:15 15 23 38 06:00-06:15 124 58 182 12:00-12:15 194 204 398 06:00-06:15 152 212 364 12:15-12:30 8 13 21 06:15-06:30 171 90 261 12:15-12:30 191 192 383 06:15-06:30 114 195 309 12:30-12:45 4 10 14 06:30-06:45 228 108 336 12:30-12:45 191 186 377 06:30-06:45 134 188 322 12:45-01:00 4 7 11 06:45-07:00 236 112 348 12:45-01:00 207 194 401 06:45-07:00 149 152 301 01:00-01:15 8 7 15 07:00-07:15 249 150 399 01:00-01:15 190 206 396 07:00-07:15 120 170 290 01:15-01:30 6 3 9 07:15-07:30 251 212 463 01:15-01:30 175 235 410 07:15-07:30 92 137 229 01:30-01:45 8 9 17 07:30-07:45 206 245 451 01:30-01:45 202 254 456 07:30-07:45 117 139 256 01:45-02:00 5 5 10 07:45-08:00 224 200 424 01:45-02:00 215 247 462 07:45-08:00 98 130 228 02:00-02:15 4 14 18 08:00-08:15 225 177 402 02:00-02:15 217 215 432 08:00-08:15 74 128 202 02:15-02:30 5 5 10 08:15-08:30 251 183 434 02:15-02:30 198 228 426 08:15-08:30 86 109 195 02:30-02:45 5 2 7 08:30-08:45 257 183 440 02:30-02:45 208 232 440 08:30-08:45 68 114 182 02:45-03:00 7 4 11 08:45-09:00 252 177 429 02:45-03:00 214 239 453 08:45-09:00 71 93 164 03:00-03:15 6 8 14 09:00-09:15 228 161 389 03:00-03:15 215 254 469 09:00-09:15 77 113 190 03:15-03:30 14 5 19 09:15-09:30 226 173 399 03:15-03:30 235 227 462 09:15-09:30 54 101 155 03:30-03:45 17 6 23 09:30-09:45 235 185 420 03:30-03:45 251 254 505 09:30-09:45 59 95 154 03:45-04:00 17 5 22 09:45-10:00 239 177 416 03:45-04:00 258 245 503 09:45-10:00 44 90 134 04:00-04:15 19 7 26 10:00-10:15 236 155 391 04:00-04:15 240 253 493 10:00-10:15 35 73 108 04:15-04:30 31 3 34 10:15-10:30 217 176 393 04:15-04:30 210 253 463 10:15-10:30 37 54 91 04:30-04:45 27 14 41 10:30-10:45 228 191 419 04:30-04:45 222 256 478 10:30-10:45 22 52 74 04:45-05:00 34 15 49 10:45-11:00 238 189 427 04:45-05:00 227 268 495 10:45-11:00 23 52 75 05:00-05:15 48 24 72 11:00-11:15 197 191 388 05:00-05:15 199 240 439 11:00-11:15 19 40 59 05:15-05:30 57 20 77 11:15-11:30 191 176 367 05:15-05:30 174 257 431 11:15-11:30 17 29 46 05:30-05:45 113 28 141 11:30-11:45 202 217 419 05:30-05:45 163 238 401 11:30-11:45 15 24 39 05:45-06:00 109 46 155 11:45-12:00 222 173 395 05:45-06:00 155 252 407 11:45-12:00 9 25 34 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 906 834 1740 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 959 1005 1964 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.95 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.85 AM-D(%) 52.07 47.93 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.83 51.17 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:15 PM to 04:15 PM 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 985 834 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 984 1030 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 906 834 1740 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 959 1005 1964 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.95 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.85 AM-D(%) 52.07 47.93 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.83 51.17 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 5,333 4,059 9,392 PEAK HR TIME 01:30 PM to 02:30 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 5,904 4,342 10,246 PEAK HR VOLUME 832 944 1776 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 4,951 5,629 10,580 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 6,637 8,144 14,781 PEAK HR TIME 09:15 AM to 10:15AM 01:15 PM to 02:15 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 12,541 12,486 25,027 PEAK HR VOLUME 936 951 D(%) 50.11 49.89 100.00 Run Date:2015/03/09 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2014 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 22900 Functional Class:URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 11 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 03/11/2014 12:00-12:15 9 17 26 06:00-06:15 151 56 207 12:00-12:15 189 178 367 06:00-06:15 141 202 343 12:15-12:30 9 12 21 06:15-06:30 184 98 282 12:15-12:30 209 199 408 06:15-06:30 133 226 359 12:30-12:45 1 11 12 06:30-06:45 216 110 326 12:30-12:45 191 169 360 06:30-06:45 126 207 333 12:45-01:00 7 8 15 06:45-07:00 224 114 338 12:45-01:00 206 223 429 06:45-07:00 129 172 301 01:00-01:15 7 7 14 07:00-07:15 264 139 403 01:00-01:15 159 224 383 07:00-07:15 106 169 275 01:15-01:30 5 10 15 07:15-07:30 240 221 461 01:15-01:30 199 211 410 07:15-07:30 103 132 235 01:30-01:45 2 7 9 07:30-07:45 249 237 486 01:30-01:45 208 215 423 07:30-07:45 90 143 233 01:45-02:00 0 6 6 07:45-08:00 205 184 389 01:45-02:00 193 192 385 07:45-08:00 93 139 232 02:00-02:15 7 8 15 08:00-08:15 197 175 372 02:00-02:15 185 237 422 08:00-08:15 70 129 199 02:15-02:30 6 7 13 08:15-08:30 235 188 423 02:15-02:30 194 236 430 08:15-08:30 88 103 191 02:30-02:45 6 2 8 08:30-08:45 250 189 439 02:30-02:45 180 245 425 08:30-08:45 77 113 190 02:45-03:00 7 3 10 08:45-09:00 216 164 380 02:45-03:00 208 233 441 08:45-09:00 86 127 213 03:00-03:15 9 8 17 09:00-09:15 196 167 363 03:00-03:15 247 239 486 09:00-09:15 81 112 193 03:15-03:30 6 2 8 09:15-09:30 248 152 400 03:15-03:30 251 256 507 09:15-09:30 69 121 190 03:30-03:45 14 5 19 09:30-09:45 223 159 382 03:30-03:45 245 198 443 09:30-09:45 55 107 162 03:45-04:00 23 4 27 09:45-10:00 254 165 419 03:45-04:00 248 256 504 09:45-10:00 45 87 132 04:00-04:15 17 8 25 10:00-10:15 224 151 375 04:00-04:15 249 251 500 10:00-10:15 27 84 111 04:15-04:30 27 8 35 10:15-10:30 219 177 396 04:15-04:30 216 238 454 10:15-10:30 25 71 96 04:30-04:45 31 20 51 10:30-10:45 207 147 354 04:30-04:45 229 268 497 10:30-10:45 29 53 82 04:45-05:00 42 16 58 10:45-11:00 226 220 446 04:45-05:00 242 229 471 10:45-11:00 16 56 72 05:00-05:15 71 21 92 11:00-11:15 203 174 377 05:00-05:15 200 270 470 11:00-11:15 14 30 44 05:15-05:30 71 33 104 11:15-11:30 224 174 398 05:15-05:30 199 276 475 11:15-11:30 25 25 50 05:30-05:45 112 39 151 11:30-11:45 209 194 403 05:30-05:45 172 245 417 11:30-11:45 13 24 37 05:45-06:00 119 60 179 11:45-12:00 189 164 353 05:45-06:00 143 225 368 11:45-12:00 6 22 28 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:00 AM to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 958 781 1739 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 942 1013 1955 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.99 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.86 AM-D(%) 55.09 44.91 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.18 51.82 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 06:45 AM to 07:45 AM 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:15 PM to 04:15 PM 04:30 PM to 05:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 977 817 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 993 1043 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:00 AM to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 958 781 1739 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 942 1013 1955 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.99 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.86 AM-D(%) 55.09 44.91 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.18 51.82 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 5,253 3,919 9,172 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 5,861 4,241 10,102 PEAK HR VOLUME 767 951 1718 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 4,962 5,513 10,475 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 6,609 8,167 14,776 PEAK HR TIME 09:15 AM to 10:15AM 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 12,470 12,408 24,878 PEAK HR VOLUME 949 951 D(%) 50.12 49.88 100.00 Run Date: 2015/03/19 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2014 Site ID: B71001111842 Route No: 11 Date From: 2014/03/10 0:00 Town: Hawaii Direction: +MP Date To: 2014/03/11 23:45 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St Functional Classification: 14 URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER REPORT TOTALS-48 HOURS RECORDED VOLUME % NUMBER OF AXLES Cycles 494 0.99% 988 PC 37689 75.52% 75378 2A-4T 10753 21.55% 21506 ------------------------ ------------ LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS 48936 98.06% 97872 HEAVY VEHICLES Bus 174 0.35% 435 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 116 0.23% 232 3A-SU 241 0.48% 723 4A-SU 60 0.12% 240 SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 203 0.41% 812 5A-ST 62 0.12% 310 6A-ST 36 0.07% 216 MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 26 0.05% 130 6A-MT 5 0.01% 30 7A-MT 48 0.10% 336 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 971 1.95% 3464 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 49907(A) 100.00% 101336 (B) UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS -2 -0.00% AXLE ROADTUBE CORRECTION EQUIVALENT(B/2)= 50668 (C) FACTOR(A/C)= 0.985 %TOTAL HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 HOURK-FACTOR VOLUME : 1940 HOUR HOUR TRUCK % (PEAK/AADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 2014/03/1115:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT (65A-1) (65A-2) TRUCKS(TYPE 4-7) 45 2.32% 295 1.29% 8.47% COMBINATION (6513-1) 22900 (6513-2) (TYPE 8-13) 28 1.44% 190 0.83% 8.47% N ISLAND: HAWAII AREA: HOLUALOA TO NALANI STREET D-2 KUAKINI HIGHWAY ROUTE 11 ------- ------------------- D-1 ----- ------------------- D-1 TO LAKO ROAD 725 � CHRYSLER NISSAN CAR DEALERSHIP CAR DEALERSHIP Station No: B71 0011 11842 Station Location: Kuakini Highway between Nalani Street and Lako Street Station Mileage: 118.84 GPS Coord (Latitude): 19.610008 N GPS Coord (Longitude): 155.965294 W Begin Survey (Date/Time): 6-16-14 0000 End Survey (Date/Time): 6-19-14 0000 Survey Method: LOOP HOSE OTHER Survey Type: VOL CLASS SPEED OTHER Survey Crew: FIELD CREW IModule No.: HPMS DATA Segment Description: KUAKINI HIGHWAY - SUNSET DRIVE TO LAKO ROAD Segment Begin LRS 117.13 Segment End LRS 119.13 Length 2.00 Func Area Route D-1 = Direction to End of Route Facility Name Juris Class Type No. Mile D-2 = Direction to Beginning of Route D-1 TO PALANI ROAD KUAKINI HIGHWAY S 2 1 11 118.84 D-2 TO KAMEHAMEHA AVENUE Sketch By: RG Date: 2/6/2014 SLD: 2003 Run Date:2015/07/22 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2014 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT- 22900 Functional Class:URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type:VOLUME Counter Type:Tube Route No: 11 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 06/17/2014 12:00-12:15 18 7 25 06:00-06:15 52 142 194 12:00-12:15 160 183 343 06:00-06:15 176 155 331 12:15-12:30 15 14 29 06:15-06:30 86 178 264 12:15-12:30 208 164 372 06:15-06:30 220 134 354 12:30-12:45 21 6 27 06:30-06:45 100 210 310 12:30-12:45 175 164 339 06:30-06:45 191 116 307 12:45-01:00 8 8 16 06:45-07:00 122 238 360 12:45-01:00 194 174 368 06:45-07:00 162 96 258 01:00-01:15 5 11 16 07:00-07:15 118 213 331 01:00-01:15 200 160 360 07:00-07:15 158 88 246 01:15-01:30 10 4 14 07:15-07:30 162 246 408 01:15-01:30 186 201 387 07:15-07:30 151 104 255 01:30-01:45 4 2 6 07:30-07:45 218 239 457 01:30-01:45 202 189 391 07:30-07:45 120 110 230 01:45-02:00 5 5 10 07:45-08:00 234 247 481 01:45-02:00 202 204 406 07:45-08:00 126 96 222 02:00-02:15 2 8 10 08:00-08:15 176 198 374 02:00-02:15 220 180 400 08:00-08:15 92 82 174 02:15-02:30 3 6 9 08:15-08:30 204 200 404 02:15-02:30 208 179 387 08:15-08:30 132 91 223 02:30-02:45 6 2 8 08:30-08:45 178 198 376 02:30-02:45 198 215 413 08:30-08:45 121 80 201 02:45-03:00 2 5 7 08:45-09:00 162 209 371 02:45-03:00 210 176 386 08:45-09:00 101 59 160 03:00-03:15 7 6 13 09:00-09:15 176 206 382 03:00-03:15 226 182 408 09:00-09:15 101 59 160 03:15-03:30 6 8 14 09:15-09:30 168 217 385 03:15-03:30 241 226 467 09:15-09:30 97 67 164 03:30-03:45 3 5 8 09:30-09:45 157 216 373 03:30-03:45 222 208 430 09:30-09:45 117 60 177 03:45-04:00 8 14 22 09:45-10:00 168 226 394 03:45-04:00 256 209 465 09:45-10:00 100 62 162 04:00-04:15 6 12 18 10:00-10:15 149 191 340 04:00-04:15 254 202 456 10:00-10:15 65 42 107 04:15-04:30 3 34 37 10:15-10:30 150 206 356 04:15-04:30 249 208 457 10:15-10:30 73 42 115 04:30-04:45 10 32 42 10:30-10:45 158 193 351 04:30-04:45 249 191 440 10:30-10:45 70 32 102 04:45-05:00 18 31 49 10:45-11:00 172 212 384 04:45-05:00 266 217 483 10:45-11:00 39 30 69 05:00-05:15 16 52 68 11:00-11:15 153 206 359 05:00-05:15 235 190 425 11:00-11:15 45 24 69 05:15-05:30 39 70 109 11:15-11:30 179 204 383 05:15-05:30 230 166 396 11:15-11:30 43 16 59 05:30-05:45 34 88 122 11:30-11:45 184 198 382 05:30-05:45 234 150 384 11:30-11:45 31 18 49 05:45-06:00 50 112 162 11:45-12:00 190 176 366 05:45-06:00 203 154 357 11:45-12:00 22 6 28 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 790 930 1720 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 1018 818 1836 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.30 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.79 AM-D(%) 45.93 54.07 100.00 PM-D(%) 55.45 44.55 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM 07:00 AM to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 03:15 PM to 04:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 832 945 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 1018 845 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 790 930 1720 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 1018 818 1836 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.30 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.79 AM-D(%) 45.93 54.07 100.00 PM-D(%) 55.45 44.55 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 3,816 4,969 8,785 PEAK HR TIME 01:45 PM to 02:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 4,115 5,511 9,626 PEAK HR VOLUME 828 778 1606 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 5,228 4,492 9,720 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 7,781 6,161 13,942 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 09:00 AM to 10:00AM 24 HOUR PERIOD 11,896 11,672 23,568 PEAK HR VOLUME 836 865 D(%) 50.48 49.52 100.00 Run Date:2015/07/22 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2014 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT- 22900 Functional Class:URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type:VOLUME Counter Type:Tube Route No: 11 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 06/18/2014 12:00-12:15 18 12 30 06:00-06:15 46 129 175 12:00-12:15 192 208 400 06:00-06:15 186 126 312 12:15-12:30 22 6 28 06:15-06:30 95 170 265 12:15-12:30 ISO 192 372 06:15-06:30 192 120 312 12:30-12:45 17 8 25 06:30-06:45 81 230 311 12:30-12:45 184 182 366 06:30-06:45 191 126 317 12:45-01:00 8 7 15 06:45-07:00 118 262 380 12:45-01:00 212 178 390 06:45-07:00 163 97 260 01:00-01:15 6 0 6 07:00-07:15 114 200 314 01:00-01:15 188 162 350 07:00-07:15 142 104 246 01:15-01:30 6 4 10 07:15-07:30 168 226 394 01:15-01:30 181 188 369 07:15-07:30 164 103 267 01:30-01:45 7 3 10 07:30-07:45 191 212 403 01:30-01:45 216 199 415 07:30-07:45 146 98 244 01:45-02:00 3 2 5 07:45-08:00 198 229 427 01:45-02:00 211 189 400 07:45-08:00 127 102 229 02:00-02:15 15 6 21 08:00-08:15 172 208 380 02:00-02:15 217 166 383 08:00-08:15 133 72 205 02:15-02:30 6 6 12 08:15-08:30 160 186 346 02:15-02:30 206 220 426 08:15-08:30 113 62 175 02:30-02:45 4 6 10 08:30-08:45 182 200 382 02:30-02:45 214 230 444 08:30-08:45 119 92 211 02:45-03:00 8 7 15 08:45-09:00 173 230 403 02:45-03:00 214 177 391 08:45-09:00 84 58 142 03:00-03:15 8 8 16 09:00-09:15 144 191 335 03:00-03:15 236 196 432 09:00-09:15 100 64 164 03:15-03:30 6 14 20 09:15-09:30 166 226 392 03:15-03:30 231 216 447 09:15-09:30 110 60 170 03:30-03:45 6 9 15 09:30-09:45 166 226 392 03:30-03:45 253 179 432 09:30-09:45 87 66 153 03:45-04:00 6 18 24 09:45-10:00 172 204 376 03:45-04:00 229 240 469 09:45-10:00 102 63 165 04:00-04:15 4 22 26 10:00-10:15 184 218 402 04:00-04:15 232 225 457 10:00-10:15 84 50 134 04:15-04:30 6 18 24 10:15-10:30 164 204 368 04:15-04:30 248 186 434 10:15-10:30 86 49 135 04:30-04:45 12 27 39 10:30-10:45 193 178 371 04:30-04:45 276 174 450 10:30-10:45 77 22 99 04:45-05:00 14 42 56 10:45-11:00 176 220 396 04:45-05:00 234 232 466 10:45-11:00 58 30 88 05:00-05:15 11 55 66 11:00-11:15 188 173 361 05:00-05:15 244 202 446 11:00-11:15 51 32 83 05:15-05:30 27 62 89 11:15-11:30 206 192 398 05:15-05:30 250 190 440 11:15-11:30 44 18 62 05:30-05:45 42 68 110 11:30-11:45 181 192 373 05:30-05:45 214 132 346 11:30-11:45 27 21 48 05:45-06:00 54 133 187 11:45-12:00 168 170 338 05:45-06:00 204 148 352 11:45-12:00 28 12 40 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 729 875 1604 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 985 825 1810 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.77 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.64 AM-D(%) 45.45 54.55 100.00 PM-D(%) 54.42 45.58 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15AM 06:30 AM to 07:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:30 PM to 05:30 PM 03:15 PM to 04:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 729 918 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 1004 860 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 729 875 1604 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 985 825 1810 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.77 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.64 AM-D(%) 45.45 54.55 100.00 PM-D(%) 54.42 45.58 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 3,806 4,876 8,682 PEAK HR TIME 01:45 PM to 02:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 4,122 5,419 9,541 PEAK HR VOLUME 848 805 1653 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 5,266 4,611 9,877 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 7,880 6,258 14,138 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 09:15 AM to 10:15AM 24 HOUR PERIOD 12,002 11,677 23,679 PEAK HR VOLUME 851 874 D(%) 50.69 49.31 100.00 1 Traffic Data Service Traffic Station Sketch N Island:Hawaii Area:Holualoa Section ID/Station#:B71001111842 Nalani St D2 4 Kuakini Hwy ------------------------------- ----------------------- D1 10 1 Lako St Meter# File Name GPS 1. bt29 D0914039 B71001111842 19.61076,-155.9657 D0914040 671001111842 Station Description: Kuakini Hwy: Nalani St to Lako St Survey Beginning Date/Time: Survey Ending Date/Time: 9/14/15@ 0000 9/15/15@ 2400 Survey Method: Road Tube Data Type: Class Survey Crew: LM C1B Sketch Updated: By: SR Remarks: FACILITY NAME JURI FUNC AREA ROUTE CLASS TYPE NO. MILE Kuakini Hwy 14 11 D1=Direction to End D1:Lako St/Palani Rd(Rte 190) D2=Direction to Begin D2:Nalani St/Kamehameha Ave(Rte 19) Run Date:2016/05/18 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2015 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 20100 Functional Class:URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 11 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 09/14/2015 12:00-12:15 9 15 24 06:00-06:15 153 57 210 12:00-12:15 171 164 335 06:00-06:15 128 174 302 12:15-12:30 7 20 27 06:15-06:30 186 90 276 12:15-12:30 137 163 300 06:15-06:30 114 193 307 12:30-12:45 17 15 32 06:30-06:45 184 97 281 12:30-12:45 150 161 311 06:30-06:45 148 172 320 12:45-01:00 11 20 31 06:45-07:00 235 97 332 12:45-01:00 137 182 319 06:45-07:00 124 171 295 01:00-01:15 6 11 17 07:00-07:15 137 112 249 01:00-01:15 120 174 294 07:00-07:15 97 167 264 01:15-01:30 9 10 19 07:15-07:30 138 152 290 01:15-01:30 173 153 326 07:15-07:30 90 160 250 01:30-01:45 6 5 11 07:30-07:45 155 167 322 01:30-01:45 160 184 344 07:30-07:45 74 150 224 01:45-02:00 15 7 22 07:45-08:00 111 169 280 01:45-02:00 162 170 332 07:45-08:00 79 120 199 02:00-02:15 4 6 10 08:00-08:15 190 140 330 02:00-02:15 170 191 361 08:00-08:15 90 131 221 02:15-02:30 6 8 14 08:15-08:30 167 149 316 02:15-02:30 145 171 316 08:15-08:30 43 105 148 02:30-02:45 5 8 13 08:30-08:45 222 126 348 02:30-02:45 171 183 354 08:30-08:45 89 93 182 02:45-03:00 8 4 12 08:45-09:00 113 140 253 02:45-03:00 178 167 345 08:45-09:00 83 94 177 03:00-03:15 7 4 11 09:00-09:15 113 67 180 03:00-03:15 168 162 330 09:00-09:15 63 97 160 03:15-03:30 8 3 11 09:15-09:30 176 117 293 03:15-03:30 143 170 313 09:15-09:30 76 79 155 03:30-03:45 10 8 18 09:30-09:45 142 141 283 03:30-03:45 87 151 238 09:30-09:45 48 107 155 03:45-04:00 23 5 28 09:45-10:00 172 121 293 03:45-04:00 173 183 356 09:45-10:00 42 79 121 04:00-04:15 21 6 27 10:00-10:15 182 107 289 04:00-04:15 155 187 342 10:00-10:15 46 75 121 04:15-04:30 23 11 34 10:15-10:30 175 132 307 04:15-04:30 130 157 287 10:15-10:30 55 82 137 04:30-04:45 43 12 55 10:30-10:45 196 131 327 04:30-04:45 157 149 306 10:30-10:45 46 75 121 04:45-05:00 57 18 75 10:45-11:00 166 142 308 04:45-05:00 179 166 345 10:45-11:00 33 78 111 05:00-05:15 58 18 76 11:00-11:15 134 157 291 05:00-05:15 136 195 331 11:00-11:15 27 54 81 05:15-05:30 85 20 105 11:15-11:30 166 182 348 05:15-05:30 137 210 347 11:15-11:30 29 45 74 05:30-05:45 108 38 146 11:30-11:45 178 163 341 05:30-05:45 139 170 309 11:30-11:45 20 40 60 05:45-06:00 125 55 180 11:45-12:00 94 152 246 05:45-06:00 145 176 321 11:45-12:00 16 31 47 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:45 AM to 08:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 690 584 1274 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 591 741 1332 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.37 PM-K FACTOR(%) 6.66 AM-D(%) 54.16 45.84 100.00 PM-D(%) 44.37 55.63 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 06:00 AM to 07:00 AM 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM 05:00 PM to 06:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 758 628 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 621 751 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 10:45 AM to 11:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 644 644 1288 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 664 712 1376 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.44 PM-K FACTOR(%) 6.89 AM-D(%) 50.00 50.00 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.26 51.74 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 3,885 3,108 6,993 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 4,556 3,435 7,991 PEAK HR VOLUME 664 712 1376 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 3,623 4,139 7,762 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 5,283 6,711 11,994 PEAK HR TIME 09:45 AM to 10:45 AM 01:30 PM to 02:30 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 9,839 10,146 19,985 PEAK HR VOLUME 725 716 D(%) 49.23 50.77 100.00 Run Date:2016/05/18 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2015 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 20100 Functional Class:URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 11 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 09/15/2015 12:00-12:15 9 13 22 06:00-06:15 129 63 192 12:00-12:15 156 155 311 06:00-06:15 115 216 331 12:15-12:30 8 10 18 06:15-06:30 160 74 234 12:15-12:30 135 154 289 06:15-06:30 115 185 300 12:30-12:45 10 13 23 06:30-06:45 176 81 257 12:30-12:45 150 171 321 06:30-06:45 123 159 282 12:45-01:00 2 8 10 06:45-07:00 186 82 268 12:45-01:00 153 166 319 06:45-07:00 114 160 274 01:00-01:15 4 9 13 07:00-07:15 177 94 271 01:00-01:15 147 187 334 07:00-07:15 109 167 276 01:15-01:30 6 2 8 07:15-07:30 134 167 301 01:15-01:30 153 186 339 07:15-07:30 103 153 256 01:30-01:45 0 3 3 07:30-07:45 138 100 238 01:30-01:45 172 168 340 07:30-07:45 70 139 209 01:45-02:00 3 1 4 07:45-08:00 114 128 242 01:45-02:00 165 190 355 07:45-08:00 96 123 219 02:00-02:15 8 7 15 08:00-08:15 127 90 217 02:00-02:15 148 208 356 08:00-08:15 51 123 174 02:15-02:30 4 5 9 08:15-08:30 193 142 335 02:15-02:30 181 169 350 08:15-08:30 78 130 208 02:30-02:45 2 1 3 08:30-08:45 168 110 278 02:30-02:45 151 203 354 08:30-08:45 73 109 182 02:45-03:00 7 5 12 08:45-09:00 136 127 263 02:45-03:00 156 177 333 08:45-09:00 78 114 192 03:00-03:15 5 13 18 09:00-09:15 117 120 237 03:00-03:15 165 182 347 09:00-09:15 70 104 174 03:15-03:30 10 5 15 09:15-09:30 96 121 217 03:15-03:30 197 170 367 09:15-09:30 52 97 149 03:30-03:45 22 9 31 09:30-09:45 179 132 311 03:30-03:45 171 171 342 09:30-09:45 70 69 139 03:45-04:00 17 3 20 09:45-10:00 203 136 339 03:45-04:00 134 191 325 09:45-10:00 38 81 119 04:00-04:15 19 4 23 10:00-10:15 164 152 316 04:00-04:15 90 146 236 10:00-10:15 48 76 124 04:15-04:30 24 6 30 10:15-10:30 178 134 312 04:15-04:30 144 151 295 10:15-10:30 49 66 115 04:30-04:45 42 15 57 10:30-10:45 156 162 318 04:30-04:45 122 162 284 10:30-10:45 40 50 90 04:45-05:00 59 14 73 10:45-11:00 122 162 284 04:45-05:00 150 163 313 10:45-11:00 21 51 72 05:00-05:15 57 14 71 11:00-11:15 182 137 319 05:00-05:15 91 187 278 11:00-11:15 46 34 80 05:15-05:30 79 17 96 11:15-11:30 162 164 326 05:15-05:30 125 214 339 11:15-11:30 33 34 67 05:30-05:45 138 27 165 11:30-11:45 157 161 318 05:30-05:45 126 215 341 11:30-11:45 30 27 57 05:45-06:00 137 35 172 11:45-12:00 154 144 298 05:45-06:00 114 192 306 11:45-12:00 23 31 54 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 06:30 AM to 07:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 673 424 1097 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 667 714 1381 AM-K FACTOR(%) 5.62 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.08 AM-D(%) 61.35 38.65 100.00 PM-D(%) 48.30 51.70 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 06:15 AM to 07:15 AM 07:00 AM to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 PM to 04:00 PM 05:15 PM to 06:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 699 489 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 667 837 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 09:45 AM to 10:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 01:45 PM to 02:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 701 584 1285 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 645 770 1415 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.58 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.25 AM-D(%) 54.55 45.45 100.00 PM-D(%) 45.58 54.42 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 3,708 2,983 6,691 PEAK HR TIME 01:45 PM to 02:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 4,380 3,222 7,602 PEAK HR VOLUME 645 770 1415 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 3,496 4,278 7,774 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 5,141 6,776 11,917 PEAK HR TIME 09:30 AM to 10:30 AM 01:45 PM to 02:45 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 9,521 9,998 19,519 PEAK HR VOLUME 724 770 D(%) 48.78 51.22 100.00 Run Date: 2016/05/19 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2015 Site ID: B71001111842 Route No: 11 Date From: 2015/09/14 0:00 Town: Hawaii Direction: +MP Date To: 2015/09/15 23:45 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St Functional Classification: 14 URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER REPORT TOTALS-48 HOURS RECORDED VOLUME % NUMBER OF AXLES Cycles 478 1.21% 956 PC 32987 83.50% 65974 2A-4T 5274 13.35% 10548 ------------------------ ------------ LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS 38739 98.06% 77478 HEAVY VEHICLES Bus 97 0.25% 242 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 187 0.47% 374 3A-SU 271 0.69% 813 4A-SU 31 0.08% 124 SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 105 0.27% 420 5A-ST 73 0.18% 365 6A-ST 0 0.00% 0 MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 0 0.00% 0 6A-MT 0 0.00% 0 7A-MT 0 0.00% 0 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 764 1.93% 2338 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 39503(A) 100.00% 79816 (B) UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 1 0.00% AXLE ROADTUBE CORRECTION EQUIVALENT(B/2)= 39908 (C) FACTOR(A/C)= 0.990 %TOTAL HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 HOURK-FACTOR VOLUME : 1393 HOUR HOUR TRUCK % (PEAK/AADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 2015/09/1514:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT (65A-1) (65A-2) TRUCKS(TYPE 4-7) 24 1.72% 293 1.46% 6.93% COMBINATION (6913-1) 20100 (6513-2) (TYPE 8-13) 11 0.79% 88 0.44% 6.93% 1 Traffic Data Service Traffic Station Sketch N Island:Hawaii Area:Holualoa Section ID/Station#: B71 001 1 1 1 842 Nalani St D2 4 Kuakini Hwy -------------------------------- -------------------------- DI ------------------------------- -------------------------D1 10 1 Lako St Meter# File Name GPS 1. bt29 D0427039_B71001111842 19.61001,-155.9657 D0427040_B71001111842 Station Description: Kuakini Hwy: Nalani St to Lako St Survey Beginning Date/Time: Survey Ending Date/Time: 4/27/16@ 0000 4/28/16@ 2400 Survey Method: Road Tube Data Type: Class Survey Crew: LM C1B Sketch Updated: By: SR Remarks: FACILITY NAME JURI FDNC AREA ROUTE CLASS TYPE NO. MILE Kuakini Hwy 14 11 D1=Direction to End D 1:Lako St/Palani Rd(Rte 190) D2=Direction to Beein D2:NaIanl St/Kamehameha Ave(Rte 19) Run Date:2017/08/09 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2016 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 21500 Functional Class:URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 11 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 04/27/2016 12:00-12:15 3 29 32 06:00-06:15 172 87 259 12:00-12:15 186 193 379 06:00-06:15 140 202 342 12:15-12:30 7 15 22 06:15-06:30 256 126 382 12:15-12:30 196 179 375 06:15-06:30 137 193 330 12:30-12:45 9 16 25 06:30-06:45 234 98 332 12:30-12:45 197 205 402 06:30-06:45 137 187 324 12:45-01:00 6 9 15 06:45-07:00 251 141 392 12:45-01:00 189 209 398 06:45-07:00 116 173 289 01:00-01:15 4 8 12 07:00-07:15 249 153 402 01:00-01:15 195 228 423 07:00-07:15 109 140 249 01:15-01:30 5 5 10 07:15-07:30 211 186 397 01:15-01:30 194 200 394 07:15-07:30 96 138 234 01:30-01:45 8 3 11 07:30-07:45 222 244 466 01:30-01:45 211 212 423 07:30-07:45 85 142 227 01:45-02:00 6 11 17 07:45-08:00 224 177 401 01:45-02:00 219 200 419 07:45-08:00 79 137 216 02:00-02:15 6 9 15 08:00-08:15 238 177 415 02:00-02:15 223 207 430 08:00-08:15 61 132 193 02:15-02:30 9 6 15 08:15-08:30 244 167 411 02:15-02:30 213 236 449 08:15-08:30 62 129 191 02:30-02:45 5 3 8 08:30-08:45 220 176 396 02:30-02:45 227 224 451 08:30-08:45 71 138 209 02:45-03:00 1 6 7 08:45-09:00 204 165 369 02:45-03:00 225 230 455 08:45-09:00 81 126 207 03:00-03:15 4 6 10 09:00-09:15 229 158 387 03:00-03:15 201 235 436 09:00-09:15 53 80 133 03:15-03:30 9 6 15 09:15-09:30 217 163 380 03:15-03:30 192 234 426 09:15-09:30 69 85 154 03:30-03:45 17 13 30 09:30-09:45 248 161 409 03:30-03:45 219 254 473 09:30-09:45 38 87 125 03:45-04:00 13 6 19 09:45-10:00 228 185 413 03:45-04:00 241 237 478 09:45-10:00 42 71 113 04:00-04:15 22 8 30 10:00-10:15 213 158 371 04:00-04:15 211 250 461 10:00-10:15 44 72 116 04:15-04:30 30 11 41 10:15-10:30 193 175 368 04:15-04:30 237 242 479 10:15-10:30 44 62 106 04:30-04:45 42 7 49 10:30-10:45 189 159 348 04:30-04:45 235 243 478 10:30-10:45 46 67 113 04:45-05:00 61 23 84 10:45-11:00 218 196 414 04:45-05:00 232 251 483 10:45-11:00 29 46 75 05:00-05:15 54 18 72 11:00-11:15 207 152 359 05:00-05:15 204 265 469 11:00-11:15 19 52 71 05:15-05:30 94 30 124 11:15-11:30 186 198 384 05:15-05:30 186 230 416 11:15-11:30 15 34 49 05:30-05:45 118 52 170 11:30-11:45 196 165 361 05:30-05:45 153 258 411 11:30-11:45 3 34 37 05:45-06:00 160 60 220 11:45-12:00 189 214 403 05:45-06:00 171 230 401 11:45-12:00 9 17 26 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:15 PM to 05:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 928 765 1693 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 908 1001 1909 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.82 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.69 AM-D(%) 54.81 45.19 100.00 PM-D(%) 47.56 52.44 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 06:15 AM to 07:15 AM 07:15 AM to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:45 PM to 04:45 PM 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 990 784 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 924 1004 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:15 PM to 05:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 928 765 1693 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 908 1001 1909 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.82 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.69 AM-D(%) 54.81 45.19 100.00 PM-D(%) 47.56 52.44 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 5,238 3,981 9,219 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 5,931 4,341 10,272 PEAK HR VOLUME 888 897 1785 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 4,957 5,452 10,409 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 6,542 7,996 14,538 PEAK HR TIME 09:00 AM to 10:00 AM 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 12,473 12,337 24,810 PEAK HR VOLUME 922 897 D(%) 50.27 49.73 100.00 Run Date:2017/08/09 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2016 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 21500 Functional Class:URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 11 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 04/28/2016 12:00-12:15 10 13 23 06:00-06:15 178 84 262 12:00-12:15 156 164 320 06:00-06:15 153 192 345 12:15-12:30 12 18 30 06:15-06:30 241 94 335 12:15-12:30 186 211 397 06:15-06:30 148 195 343 12:30-12:45 9 13 22 06:30-06:45 255 117 372 12:30-12:45 180 196 376 06:30-06:45 129 207 336 12:45-01:00 4 12 16 06:45-07:00 248 114 362 12:45-01:00 195 182 377 06:45-07:00 124 190 314 01:00-01:15 4 4 8 07:00-07:15 221 162 383 01:00-01:15 202 203 405 07:00-07:15 96 148 244 01:15-01:30 2 7 9 07:15-07:30 241 187 428 01:15-01:30 179 240 419 07:15-07:30 100 165 265 01:30-01:45 8 3 11 07:30-07:45 224 216 440 01:30-01:45 191 234 425 07:30-07:45 87 145 232 01:45-02:00 10 5 15 07:45-08:00 216 201 417 01:45-02:00 204 205 409 07:45-08:00 86 122 208 02:00-02:15 9 9 18 08:00-08:15 225 147 372 02:00-02:15 189 216 405 08:00-08:15 84 146 230 02:15-02:30 8 6 14 08:15-08:30 231 167 398 02:15-02:30 188 214 402 08:15-08:30 81 143 224 02:30-02:45 3 6 9 08:30-08:45 252 138 390 02:30-02:45 209 225 434 08:30-08:45 74 124 198 02:45-03:00 3 8 11 08:45-09:00 239 159 398 02:45-03:00 232 230 462 08:45-09:00 53 152 205 03:00-03:15 6 4 10 09:00-09:15 234 169 403 03:00-03:15 216 234 450 09:00-09:15 73 114 187 03:15-03:30 13 5 18 09:15-09:30 208 193 401 03:15-03:30 235 192 427 09:15-09:30 75 113 188 03:30-03:45 12 11 23 09:30-09:45 227 164 391 03:30-03:45 244 241 485 09:30-09:45 73 90 163 03:45-04:00 17 10 27 09:45-10:00 236 180 416 03:45-04:00 222 230 452 09:45-10:00 53 100 153 04:00-04:15 23 10 33 10:00-10:15 220 148 368 04:00-04:15 237 236 473 10:00-10:15 35 83 118 04:15-04:30 28 10 38 10:15-10:30 218 193 411 04:15-04:30 233 243 476 10:15-10:30 42 71 113 04:30-04:45 38 14 52 10:30-10:45 186 163 349 04:30-04:45 219 253 472 10:30-10:45 40 58 98 04:45-05:00 54 17 71 10:45-11:00 195 174 369 04:45-05:00 222 241 463 10:45-11:00 24 60 84 05:00-05:15 52 22 74 11:00-11:15 200 186 386 05:00-05:15 201 254 455 11:00-11:15 20 43 63 05:15-05:30 90 27 117 11:15-11:30 212 188 400 05:15-05:30 168 250 418 11:15-11:30 22 49 71 05:30-05:45 111 45 156 11:30-11:45 210 196 406 05:30-05:45 182 258 440 11:30-11:45 14 36 50 05:45-06:00 141 50 191 11:45-12:00 210 182 392 05:45-06:00 195 215 410 11:45-12:00 13 28 41 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:00 AM to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 902 766 1668 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 936 950 1886 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.68 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.55 AM-D(%) 54.08 45.92 100.00 PM-D(%) 49.63 50.37 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 06:15 AM to 07:15 AM 07:00 AM to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:15 PM to 04:15 PM 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 965 766 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 938 1003 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:00 AM to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 902 766 1668 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 936 950 1886 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.68 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.55 AM-D(%) 54.08 45.92 100.00 PM-D(%) 49.63 50.37 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 5,327 3,922 9,249 PEAK HR TIME 02:00 PM to 03:00 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 5,994 4,251 10,245 PEAK HR VOLUME 818 885 1703 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 4,885 5,367 10,252 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 6,584 8,141 14,725 PEAK HR TIME 09:00 AM to 10:00 AM 01:15 PM to 02:15 PM 24 HOUR PERIOD 12,578 12,392 24,970 PEAK HR VOLUME 905 895 D(%) 50.37 49.63 100.00 Run Date: 2017/08/09 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2016 Site ID: B71001111842 Route No: 11 Date From: 2016/04/27 0:00 Town: Hawaii Direction: +MP Date To: 2016/04/28 23:45 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St Functional Classification: 14 URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER REPORT TOTALS-48 HOURS RECORDED VOLUME % NUMBER OF AXLES Cycles 363 0.73% 727 PC 34298 6890% 68596 2A-4T 14210 28.55% 28420 ------------------------ ------------ LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS 48871 98.17% 97743 HEAVY VEHICLES Bus 228 0.46% 570 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 214 0.43% 428 3A-SU 119 0.24% 357 4A-SU 28 0.06% 112 SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 189 0.38% 756 5A-ST 63 0.13% 315 6A-ST 18 0.04% 108 MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 10 0.02% 50 6A-MT 4 0.01% 24 7A-MT 37 0.07% 259 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 910 1.83% 2979 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 49781 (A) 100.00% 100722 (B) UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS -1 -0.00% AXLE ROADTUBE CORRECTION EQUIVALENT(B/2)= 50361 (C) FACTOR(A/C)= 0.988 %TOTAL HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 HOURK-FACTOR VOLUME : 1901 HOUR HOUR TRUCK % (PEAK/AADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 2016/04/2716:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT (65A-1) (65A-2) TRUCKS(TYPE 4-7) 9 0.47% 294 1.37% 8.84% COMBINATION (6913-1) 21500 (6513-2) (TYPE 8-13) 9 0.47% 160 0.74% 8.84% N ISLAND: HAWAII AREA: HOLUALOA 2084 <- TO SUNSET DRIVE D-2 KUAKINI HIGHWAY ROUTE 11 D-1 ti------------------- /�/z TO LAKO ROAD CHRYSLER NISSAN CAR DEALERSHIP CAR DEALERSHIP Station No: B71 0011 11842 Station Location: Kuakini Highway between Nalani Street and Lako Road Station Mileage: 118.84 GPS Coord (Latitude): 19.610008 N GPS Coord (Longitude): 155.965294 W Begin Survey (Date/Time): 5-24-16 0000 End Survey (Date/Time): 5-27-16 0000 Survey Method: LOOP HOSE OTHER Survey Type: VOL CLASS SPEED OTHER Survey Crew: FIELD CREW IModule No.: HPMS DATA Segment Description: KUAKINI HIGHWAY - SUNSET DRIVE TO LAKO ROAD Segment Begin LRSj 118.42 Segment End LRS 118.85 Length 0.43 Func Area Route D-1 = Direction to End of Route Facility Name Juris Class Type Yp No. Mile D-2 = Direction to Beginning of Route D-1 TO PALANI ROAD KUAKINI HIGHWAY S 2 1 11 118.84 D-2 TO KAMEHAMEHA AVENUE Sketch By: RG Date: 3/15/2016 SLD: 2003 Run Date:2017/07/06 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2016 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT: 21500 Functional Class:URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 11 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 05/25/2016 12:00-12:15 24 17 41 06:00-06:15 63 170 233 12:00-12:15 160 150 310 06:00-06:15 202 107 309 12:15-12:30 24 8 32 06:15-06:30 91 177 268 12:15-12:30 136 158 294 06:15-06:30 176 96 272 12:30-12:45 16 8 24 06:30-06:45 72 216 288 12:30-12:45 152 150 302 06:30-06:45 186 108 294 12:45-01:00 11 6 17 06:45-07:00 74 220 294 12:45-01:00 147 134 281 06:45-07:00 138 82 220 01:00-01:15 14 2 16 07:00-07:15 107 202 309 01:00-01:15 144 156 300 07:00-07:15 132 95 227 01:15-01:30 7 5 12 07:15-07:30 128 158 286 01:15-01:30 164 148 312 07:15-07:30 123 102 225 01:30-01:45 5 5 10 07:30-07:45 172 96 268 01:30-01:45 145 145 290 07:30-07:45 125 91 216 01:45-02:00 9 12 21 07:45-08:00 147 109 256 01:45-02:00 169 119 288 07:45-08:00 120 86 206 02:00-02:15 7 3 10 08:00-08:15 116 123 239 02:00-02:15 192 114 306 08:00-08:15 115 73 188 02:15-02:30 7 5 12 08:15-08:30 134 182 316 02:15-02:30 161 153 314 08:15-08:30 153 67 220 02:30-02:45 2 5 7 08:30-08:45 114 194 308 02:30-02:45 132 153 285 08:30-08:45 118 70 188 02:45-03:00 1 10 11 08:45-09:00 130 152 282 02:45-03:00 173 165 338 08:45-09:00 114 49 163 03:00-03:15 5 5 10 09:00-09:15 88 188 276 03:00-03:15 168 124 292 09:00-09:15 109 45 154 03:15-03:30 7 4 11 09:15-09:30 116 166 282 03:15-03:30 145 182 327 09:15-09:30 97 43 140 03:30-03:45 5 9 14 09:30-09:45 145 143 288 03:30-03:45 158 156 314 09:30-09:45 88 48 136 03:45-04:00 14 16 30 09:45-10:00 136 186 322 03:45-04:00 121 160 281 09:45-10:00 111 32 143 04:00-04:15 6 19 25 10:00-10:15 129 128 257 04:00-04:15 157 133 290 10:00-10:15 69 46 115 04:15-04:30 8 22 30 10:15-10:30 116 159 275 04:15-04:30 151 160 311 10:15-10:30 77 29 106 04:30-04:45 12 36 48 10:30-10:45 143 163 306 04:30-04:45 171 146 317 10:30-10:45 66 34 100 04:45-05:00 27 50 77 10:45-11:00 90 173 263 04:45-05:00 198 114 312 10:45-11:00 46 29 75 05:00-05:15 12 62 74 11:00-11:15 161 136 297 05:00-05:15 167 161 328 11:00-11:15 43 25 68 05:15-05:30 38 77 115 11:15-11:30 140 169 309 05:15-05:30 202 110 312 11:15-11:30 48 18 66 05:30-05:45 41 105 146 11:30-11:45 114 180 294 05:30-05:45 237 111 348 11:30-11:45 34 15 49 05:45-06:00 45 141 186 11:45-12:00 156 174 330 05:45-06:00 190 125 315 11:45-12:00 26 4 30 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 06:30 AM to 07:30 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 05:00 PM to 06:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 381 796 1177 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 796 507 1303 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.16 PM-K FACTOR(%) 6.82 AM-D(%) 32.37 67.63 100.00 PM-D(%) 61.09 38.91 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:30 AM to 08:30 AM 06:15 AM to 07:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 05:15 PM to 06:15 PM 03:15 PM to 04:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 569 815 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 831 631 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM PM-PEAK HR TIME 05:00 PM to 06:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 571 659 1230 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 796 507 1303 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.44 PM-K FACTOR(%) 6.82 AM-D(%) 46.42 53.58 100.00 PM-D(%) 61.09 38.91 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 2,882 3,964 6,846 PEAK HR TIME 11:15 AM to 12:15 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 3,229 4,596 7,825 PEAK HR VOLUME 570 673 1243 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 3,940 3,427 7,367 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 6,456 4,821 11,277 PEAK HR TIME 01:15 PM to 02:15 PM 09:00 AM to 10:00AM 24 HOUR PERIOD 9,685 9,417 19,102 PEAK HR VOLUME 670 683 D(%) 50.70 49.30 100.00 Run Date:2017/07/06 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 2016 Program Count-Summary Site ID:B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR 1:+MP DIR 2:-MP Final AADT- 21500 Functional Class:URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type:CLASS Counter Type:Tube Route No: 11 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-AM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-PM DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL DATE: 05/26/2016 12:00-12:15 19 11 30 06:00-06:15 58 158 216 12:00-12:15 144 153 297 06:00-06:15 170 133 303 12:15-12:30 16 4 20 06:15-06:30 71 195 266 12:15-12:30 135 139 274 06:15-06:30 137 112 249 12:30-12:45 10 6 16 06:30-06:45 82 220 302 12:30-12:45 169 125 294 06:30-06:45 169 91 260 12:45-01:00 11 10 21 06:45-07:00 108 200 308 12:45-01:00 198 105 303 06:45-07:00 171 88 259 01:00-01:15 12 3 15 07:00-07:15 87 212 299 01:00-01:15 163 152 315 07:00-07:15 139 95 234 01:15-01:30 10 10 20 07:15-07:30 177 89 266 01:15-01:30 172 146 318 07:15-07:30 116 110 226 01:30-01:45 3 4 7 07:30-07:45 179 119 298 01:30-01:45 188 131 319 07:30-07:45 113 79 192 01:45-02:00 7 4 11 07:45-08:00 142 136 278 01:45-02:00 146 146 292 07:45-08:00 137 63 200 02:00-02:15 6 8 14 08:00-08:15 140 166 306 02:00-02:15 129 153 282 08:00-08:15 118 77 195 02:15-02:30 12 5 17 08:15-08:30 112 196 308 02:15-02:30 126 192 318 08:15-08:30 121 57 178 02:30-02:45 4 6 10 08:30-08:45 127 174 301 02:30-02:45 146 155 301 08:30-08:45 136 51 187 02:45-03:00 3 8 11 08:45-09:00 128 161 289 02:45-03:00 152 159 311 08:45-09:00 106 72 178 03:00-03:15 3 3 6 09:00-09:15 139 137 276 03:00-03:15 172 136 308 09:00-09:15 104 59 163 03:15-03:30 5 8 13 09:15-09:30 102 171 273 03:15-03:30 173 135 308 09:15-09:30 97 58 155 03:30-03:45 7 10 17 09:30-09:45 109 188 297 03:30-03:45 124 201 325 09:30-09:45 102 67 169 03:45-04:00 5 13 18 09:45-10:00 134 178 312 03:45-04:00 177 141 318 09:45-10:00 75 57 132 04:00-04:15 3 18 21 10:00-10:15 107 186 293 04:00-04:15 172 156 328 10:00-10:15 86 35 121 04:15-04:30 15 26 41 10:15-10:30 129 176 305 04:15-04:30 157 182 339 10:15-10:30 63 37 100 04:30-04:45 11 40 51 10:30-10:45 127 178 305 04:30-04:45 182 164 346 10:30-10:45 54 20 74 04:45-05:00 22 56 78 10:45-11:00 84 192 276 04:45-05:00 211 122 333 10:45-11:00 43 19 62 05:00-05:15 17 65 82 11:00-11:15 123 155 278 05:00-05:15 156 154 310 11:00-11:15 47 27 74 05:15-05:30 28 72 100 11:15-11:30 141 172 313 05:15-05:30 169 168 337 11:15-11:30 38 23 61 05:30-05:45 38 109 147 11:30-11:45 145 170 315 05:30-05:45 203 127 330 11:30-11:45 34 17 51 05:45-06:00 49 129 178 11:45-12:00 134 145 279 05:45-06:00 161 150 311 11:45-12:00 37 10 47 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00-09:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00-19:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 08:00 AM to 09:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 507 697 1204 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 722 624 1346 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.24 PM-K FACTOR(%) 6.98 AM-D(%) 42.11 57.89 100.00 PM-D(%) 53.64 46.36 100.00 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 AM to 08:15AM 06:15 AM to 07:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:45 PM to 05:45 PM 03:30 PM to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 638 827 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 739 680 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 09:45 AM to 10:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 PM to 05:00 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 497 718 1215 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 722 624 1346 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.30 PM-K FACTOR(%) 6.98 AM-D(%) 40.91 59.09 100.00 PM-D(%) 53.64 46.36 100.00 NON-COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00-15:00) 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 Total TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 2,885 4,074 6,959 PEAK HR TIME 12:45 PM to 01:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 3,201 4,702 7,903 PEAK HR VOLUME 721 534 1255 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 3,925 3,592 7,517 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 6,338 5,049 11,387 PEAK HR TIME 12:45 PM to 01:45 PM 10:00 AM to 11:00AM 24 HOUR PERIOD 9,539 9,751 19,290 PEAK HR VOLUME 721 732 D(%) 49.45 50.55 100.00 Run Date: 2017/07/06 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2016 Site ID: B71001111842 Route No: 11 Date From: 2016/05/25 0:00 Town: Hawaii Direction: +MP Date To: 2016/05/26 23:45 Location: Kuakini Hwy-Nalani St to Lako St Functional Classification: 14 URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER REPORT TOTALS-48 HOURS RECORDED VOLUME % NUMBER OF AXLES Cycles 572 1.49% 1144 PC 29474 76.77% 58948 2A-4T 3304 8.61% 6608 ------------------------ ------------ LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS 33350 86.87% 66700 HEAVY VEHICLES Bus 3108 8.10% 7770 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A-6T 850 2.21% 1700 3A-SU 128 0.33% 384 4A-SU 3 0.01% 12 SINGLE-TRAILER TRUCKS 4A-ST 723 1.88% 2892 5A-ST 76 0.20% 380 6A-ST 6 0.02% 36 MULTI-TRAILER TRUCKS 5A-MT 124 0.32% 620 6A-MT 7 0.02% 42 7A-MT 16 0.04% 112 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 5041 13.13% 13948 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 38391 (A) 100.00% 80648 (B) UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 1 0.00% AXLE ROADTUBE CORRECTION EQUIVALENT(B/2)= 40324 (C) FACTOR(A/C)= 0.952 %TOTAL HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 HOURK-FACTOR VOLUME : 1346 HOUR HOUR TRUCK % (PEAK/AADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 2016/05/2616:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT (65A-1) (65A-2) TRUCKS(TYPE 4-7) 159 11.81% 2044 9.51% 6.26% COMBINATION (6513-1) 21500 (6513-2) (TYPE 8-13) 41 3.05% 476 2.21% 6.26% 9/28/21,1:03 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out RS State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 28-SEP-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 22900 Functional Class: URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 11 Location: DATE: 07-AUG-17 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:45 AM to 08:45 PM-PEAK HR TIME 3:30 PM to 4:30 AM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 957 688 1,645 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 939 899 1,838 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.65 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.43 AM-D(%) 58.18 41.82 100 PM-D(%) 51.09 48.91 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:45 AM to 08:45 07:45 AM to 08:45 3:45 PM to 4:45 5:00 PM to 6:00 AM-PEAK HRTIME AM AM PM-PEAK HR TIME PM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 957 688 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 954 994 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:45 AM to 08:45 PM-PEAK HR TIME 3:30 PM to 4:30 AM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 957 967 1,645 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 939 954 1,838 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.65 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.43 AM-D(%) 58.18 41.82 100 PM-D(%) 51.09 48.91 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 4,959 3,263 8,222 PEAK HR TIME 1:15 PM to 2P� AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 5,316 3,608 8,924 PEAK HR VOLUME 749 874 1,623 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 4,862 5,237 10,099 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 7,052 8,776 15,828 PEAK HR TIME 09:15 AM to 10:15 1:30 PM to 2:30 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 12,368 12,384 24,752 AM PM PEAK HR VOLUME 967 879 D% 49.97 50.03 100 TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 22 63 85 - 57 19 76 - 216 162 378 - 186 233 419 12:15 _ _ 0615 12:15 06:15 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:32940,7 1/4 9/28/21,1:03 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 12:15 06:15 1 1 1 12:15 �� ' 06:15 - 25 34 59 - 77 21 98 - 187 174 361 - 158 243 401 12:30 06:30 1230 06:30 12:30 06:30 1230 06:30 11 37 48 - 104 38 142 - 206 160 366 - 165 250 415 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 18 25 43 - 157 51 208 - 222 208 430 - 152 255 407 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 7 19 26 - 165 64 229 - 171 187 358 - 160 202 362 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 9 25 34 - 217 116 333 - 193 217 410 - 118 204 322 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 12 19 31 - 226 119 345 - 174 230 404 - 89 213 302 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 10 10 20 - 252 147 399 - 204 222 426 - 112 182 294 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 6 10 16 - 245 155 400 - 178 205 383 - 122 173 295 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 9 6 15 - 229 187 416 - 178 222 400 - 140 168 308 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 2 6 8 - 231 199 430 - 179 214 393 - 102 149 251 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 9 1 10 - 242 146 388 - 186 234 420 - 88 150 238 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 5 5 10 - 229 144 373 - 198 248 446 - 72 130 202 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 4 5 9 - 258 173 431 - 191 228 419 - 74 145 219 03:30 09:3003:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 1 3 4 - 234 141 375 - 222 228 450 - 64 128 192 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:32940,7 2/4 9/28/21,1:03 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 03:45 09:45 � 03:45 � � � 09:45 9 5 14 - 243 171 414 - 236 229 465 - 65 98 163 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 12 6 18 - 232 140 372 - 250 214 464 - 47 114 161 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 12 5 17 - 246 135 381 - 231 228 459 - 48 99 147 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 13 6 19 - 230 181 411 - 237 205 442 - 49 91 140 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 14 6 20 - 218 168 386 - 217 228 445 - 48 86 134 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 1100 17 3 20 - 211 174 385 - 179 238 417 - 39 58 97 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 22 15 37 - 225 173 398 - 196 249 445 - 40 55 95 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 44 12 56 - 219 181 400 - 217 253 470 - 33 55 88 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 64 19 83 - 212 220 432 - 194 254 448 - 19 58 77 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:32940,7 3/4 9/28/21,1:04 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out RS State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 28-SEP-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 22900 Functional Class: URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 11 Location: DATE: 08-AUG-17 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:45 AM to 08:45 PM-PEAK HR TIME 5:00 PM to 6:00 AM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 966 648 1,614 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 942 881 1,823 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.6 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.45 AM-D(%) 59.85 40.15 100 PM-D(%) 51.67 48.33 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK 07:30 AM to 08:30 08:00 AM to 09:00 5:00 PM to 6:00 6:00 PM to 7:00 AM-PEAK HRTIME AM AM PM-PEAK HR TIME PM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 975 671 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 942 1,009 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 08:15 AM to 09:15 PM-PEAK HR TIME 5:00 PM to 6:00 AM PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 929 975 1,618 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 942 942 1,823 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.61 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.45 AM-D(%) 59.85 40.15 100 PM-D(%) 51.67 48.33 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 4,856 3,209 8,065 PEAK HR TIME 2:00 PM to 3:00 AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 5,215 3,546 8,761 PM PEAK HR VOLUME 752 892 1,644 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 4,910 5,098 10,008 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 7,089 8,619 15,708 PEAK HR TIME 09:00 AM to 10:00 2:00 PM to 3:00 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 12,304 12,165 24,469 AM PM PEAK HR VOLUME 951 892 D% 50.28 49.72 100 TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 26 45 71 - 61 19 80 - 212 200 412 - 224 230 454 12:15 _ _ 0615 12:15 06:15 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:32940,8 1/4 9/28/21,1:04 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 12:15 06:15 � 1 � 12:15 � ' 06:15 I 19 48 67 - 83 29 112 - 177 187 364 - 164 268 432 12:30 06:30 1230 06:30 12:30 06:30 1230 06:30 18 41 59 - 119 36 155 - 196 194 390 - 156 260 416 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 17 26 43 - 142 49 191 - 191 210 401 - 134 251 385 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 13 27 40 - 183 84 267 - 193 194 387 - 163 223 386 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 7 14 21 - 214 106 320 - 192 191 383 - 155 193 348 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 4 17 21 - 240 135 375 - 222 174 396 - 126 182 308 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 7 22 29 - 247 142 389 - 192 187 379 - 106 183 289 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 7 5 12 - 246 143 389 - 171 219 390 - 91 136 227 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 4 5 9 - 242 182 424 - 200 202 402 - 100 169 269 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 6 6 12 - 231 181 412 - 202 228 430 - 93 140 233 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 8 3 11 - 213 165 378 - 179 243 422 - 70 137 207 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 2 5 7 - 243 161 404 - 170 233 403 - 89 123 212 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 5 5 10 - 232 142 374 - 212 226 438 - 66 125 191 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 6 3 9 - 245 175 420 - 165 237 402 - 63 112 175 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:32940,8 2/4 9/28/21,1:04 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out F9 Pr Rs 03:45 09:45 03:45 �� ' 09:45 8 4 12 - 231 166 397 - 241 227 468 - 68 123 191 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 11 6 17 - 201 119 320 - 191 233 424 - 53 130 183 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 12 4 16 - 241 153 394 - 213 209 422 - 48 102 150 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 13 6 19 - 203 164 367 - 220 218 438 - 48 106 154 04:45 10:45 04:45 �l 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 21 2 23 - 223 184 407 - 229 205 434 - 57 76 133 05:00 11:00 05:00 �1 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 14 6 20 - 198 179 377 - 242 224 466 - 29 79 108 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 26 9 35 - 217 146 363 - 216 212 428 - 28 61 89 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 39 9 48 - 197 144 341 - 239 217 456 - 26 58 84 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 66 19 85 - 204 205 409 - 245 228 473 - 22 54 76 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:32940,8 3/4 9/28/21,1:04 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out RS State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 28-SEP-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 24500 Functional Class: URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 11 Location: DATE: 28-OCT-19 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:00 to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 900 751 1,651 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 894 1,001 1,895 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.62 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.6 AM-D(%) 54.51 45.49 100 PM-D(%) 47.18 52.82 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 06:30 to 07:30 AM 07:15 to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 to 04:00 PM 04:30 to 05:30 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 934 756 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 894 1,039 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:00 to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 900 751 1,651 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 903 994 1,897 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.62 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.61 AM-D(%) 54.51 45.49 100 PM-D(%) 47.18 52.82 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 5,196 4,131 9,327 PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 5,891 4,410 10,301 PEAK HR VOLUME 903 994 1,897 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 4,807 5,635 10,442 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 6,446 8,181 14,627 PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM 02:45 to 03:45 PM 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 12,337 12,591 24,928 PEAK HR VOLUME 903 994 D% 49.49 50.51 100 TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 18 18 36 - 169 65 234 - 197 184 381 - 158 236 394 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12 19 31 - 209 100 309 - 185 200 385 - 161 237 398 12:30 1 1 06:30 12:30 1 1 106:30 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RCP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:39787,28 1/4 9/28/21,1:04 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 12:30 06:30 12:30 06:30 - 6 9 15 - 217 127 344 - 210 218 428 - 138 196 334 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 9 14 23 - 244 147 391 - 185 180 365 - 113 176 289 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 6 8 14 - 238 160 398 - 180 201 381 - 129 145 274 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 9 5 14 - 235 187 422 - 206 236 442 - 99 153 252 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 - 7 2 9 - 217 215 432 - 186 234 420 - 100 139 239 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 2 3 5 - 210 189 399 - 218 216 434 - 96 132 228 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 2 7 9 - 211 165 376 - 201 223 424 - 58 136 194 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 4 5 9 - 226 171 397 - 212 230 442 - 68 119 187 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 0230 08:30 3 2 5 - 236 179 415 - 209 238 447 - 79 112 191 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 9 4 13 - 215 196 411 - 224 257 481 - 69 99 168 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 5 5 10 - 213 178391 - 213 246 459 - 54 81 135 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 13 4 17 - 221 176 397 - 236 235 471 - 49 102 151 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 11 4 15 - 224 189 413 - 230 256 486 - 46 71 117 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 32 5 37 - 222 179 401 - 215 264 479 - 40 85 125 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:39787,28 2/4 9/28/21,1:04 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 29 8 37 - 221 171 392 - 177 269 446 - 31 69 100 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 31 8 39 - 224 186 410 216 224 440 - 27 53 80 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 37 10 47 - 216 191 407 - 194 260 454 - 25 42 67 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 56 18 74 - 203 218 421 - 212 269 481 - 30 34 64 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 74 17 91 - 196 158 354 - 187 251 438 - 14 42 56 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 73 17 90 - 196 194 390 - 193 259 452 - 23 37 60 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 105 50 155 - 212 192 404 - 161 227 388 - 17 32 49 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 142 37 179 - 221 198 419 - 160 258 418 - 15 18 33 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:39787,28 3/4 9/28/21,1:04 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out RS State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 28-SEP-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 24500 Functional Class: URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 11 Location: DATE: 29-OCT-19 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:00 to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 to 04:00 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 857 764 1,621 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 890 953 1,843 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.5 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.39 AM-D(%) 52.87 47.13 100 PM-D(%) 48.29 51.71 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 06:15 to 07:15 AM 07:00 to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:00 to 05:00 PM 05:15 to 06:15 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 922 764 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 891 1,006 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:00 to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 02:30 to 03:30 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 857 764 1,621 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 874 978 1,852 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.5 PM-K FACTOR(%) 7.42 AM-D(%) 52.87 47.13 100 PM-D(%) 48.29 51.71 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 5,147 3,983 9,130 PEAK HR TIME 02:30 to 03:30 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 5,868 4,312 10,180 PEAK HR VOLUME 874 978 1,852 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 4,914 5,560 10,474 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 6,543 8,227 14,770 PEAK HR TIME 09:30 to 10:30 AM 02:15 to 03:15 PM 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 12,411 12,539 24,950 PEAK HR VOLUME 894 979 D% 49.74 50.26 100 i TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 17 13 30 - 177 87 264 - 181 193 374 - 118 237 355 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 6 26 32 - 218 92 310 - 192 197 389 - 141 219 360 12:30 ` 06:30 12:30 06:30 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RCP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:39787,29 1/4 9/28/21,1:04 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 12:30 06:30 12:30 06:30 - 9 18 27 - 246 129 375 - 223 214 437 - 144 229 373 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 3 8 11 - 231 151 382 - 195 234 429 - 128 195 323 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 3 9 12 - 227 156 383 - 178 214 392 - 102 163 265 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 3 7 10 - 211 200 411 - 218 209 427 - 103 144 247 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 - 4 7 11 - 212 214 426 - 221 229 450 - 103 125 228 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 2 4 6 - 207 194 401 - 189 227 416 - 101 135 236 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 3 10 13 - 207 140 347 - 214 205 419 - 80 108 188 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 6 3 9 - 220 144 364 - 203 245 448 - 90 143 233 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 0230 08:30 10 2 12 - 236 185 421 - 195 250 445 - 79 108 187 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 6 5 11 - 220 172 392 - 214 235 449 - 59 101 160 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 5 4 9 - 236 154390 - 236 249 485 - 68 97 165 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 9 4 13 - 176 175 351 - 229 244 473 - 59 119 178 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 15 4 19 - 246 187 433 - 205 225 430 - 47 81 128 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 20 6 26 - 221 155 376 - 220 235 455 - 35 81 116 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:39787,29 2/4 9/28/21,1:04 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 25 6 31 - 225 155 380 - 236 227 463 - 33 64 97 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 42 8 50 - 202 181 383 197 241 438 - 21 75 96 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 43 10 53 - 234 187 421 - 224 241 465 - 23 54 77 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 64 20 84 - 205 162 367 - 234 242 476 - 24 44 68 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 76 22 98 - 213 211 424 - 201 235 436 - 19 56 75 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 103 28 131 - 186 177 363 - 180 257 437 - 18 40 58 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 98 53 151 - 205 183 388 - 165 252 417 - 23 26 49 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 149 52 201 - 186 192 378 - 164 260 424 - 11 23 34 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:39787,29 3/4 9/28/21,1:04 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:39787,29 4/4 9/28/21,1:05 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out RS State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 28-SEP-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 18600 Functional Class: URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 11 Location: DATE: 23-JUN-20 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:15 to 08:15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:15 to 04:15 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 819 534 1,353 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 711 931 1,642 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.8 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.25 AM-D(%) 60.53 39.47 100 PM-D(%) 43.3 56.7 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:00 to 08:00 AM 07:45 to 08:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 to 04:00 PM 03:30 to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 826 549 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 726 940 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 11:30 to 12:30 PM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:15 to 04:15 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 731 637 1,368 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 711 931 1,642 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.88 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.25 AM-D(%) 60.53 39.47 100 PM-D(%) 43.3 56.7 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 4,566 3,139 7,705 PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 5,151 3,363 8,514 PEAK HR VOLUME 725 887 1,612 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 3,834 4,746 8,580 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 4,918 6,461 11,379 PEAK HR TIME 09:00 to 10:00 AM 02:45 to 03:45 PM 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 10,069 9,824 19,893 PEAK HR VOLUME 780 887 D% 50.62 49.38 100 TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 8 11 19 - 154 75 229 - 181 168 349 - 82 181 263 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 4 12 16 - 197 92 289 - 181 164 345 - 96 180 276 12:30 1 1 06:30 12:30 1 1 1 06:30 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RCP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:42678,23 1/4 9/28/21,1:05 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out F 9Pr Rs 12:30 06:30 12:30 06:30 - 6 6 12 - 204 96 300 - 185 156 341 - 87 134 221 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 7 8 15 - 194 103 297 - 160 150 310 - 63 121 184 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 6 6 12 - 202 98 300 - 148 179 327 - 65 91 156 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 6 1 7 - 221 122 343 - 151 166 317 - 82 104 186 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 - 6 4 10 - 203 133 336 - 155 173 328 - 71 88 159 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 10 4 14 - 200 144 344 - 178 159 337 - 59 106 165 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 3 6 9 - 195 135 330 - 167 195 362 - 61 71 132 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 2 5 7 - 180 122 302 - 162 190 352 - 65 105 170 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 0230 08:30 4 3 7 - 195 148 343 - 166 201 367 - 50 79 129 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 4 2 6 - 200 143 343 - 180 199 379 - 32 57 89 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 7 2 9 - 209 133 342 - 184 209 393 - 52 59 111 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 8 4 12 - 168 110 278 - 165 235 400 - 33 54 87 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 10 4 14 - 176 151 327 - 196 244 440 - 27 53 80 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 10 2 12 - 227 154 381 - 181 213 394 - 23 40 63 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:42678,23 2/4 9/28/21,1:05 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 12 5 17 - 184 119 303 - 169 239 408 - 26 43 69 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 22 7 29 - 192 135 327 148 244 392 - 26 40 66 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 29 10 39 - 167 158 325 - 157 226 383 - 21 20 41 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 41 12 53 - 185 164 349 - 145 224 369 - 9 21 30 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 57 15 72 - 174 138 312 - 131 224 355 - 17 23 40 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 82 20 102 - 170 161 331 - 127 231 358 - 23 20 43 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 90 33 123 - 189 163 352 - 110 201 311 - 12 11 23 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 151 42 193 - 180 142 322 - 107 156 263 - 2 14 16 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:42678,23 3/4 9/28/21,1:05 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out RS State of Hawaii,Department of Transportation, Run Date: 28-SEP-21 Highways Division 15 Minute Volume Report Site ID: B71001111842 Town: Hawaii DIR1: +MP DIR 2: -MP Final AADT: 18600 Functional Class: URBAN:PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL-OTHER Count Type: CLASS Counter Type: Tube Route No: 11 Location: DATE: 24-JUN-20 AM COMMUTER PERIOD(05:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PERIOD(15:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 09:00) 19:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 07:00 to 08:00 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 872 475 1,347 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 678 944 1,622 AM-K FACTOR(%) 6.74 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.12 AM-D(%) 64.74 35.26 100 PM-D(%) 41.8 58.2 100 DIRECTIONAL PEAK DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 06:30 to 07:30 AM 08:45 to 09:45 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:00 to 04:00 PM 03:30 to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 881 535 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 701 944 AM PERIOD(00:00-12:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(12:00-24:00) DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM-PEAK HR TIME 11:00 to 12:00 PM PM-PEAK HR TIME 03:30 to 04:30 PM AM-PEAK HRVOLUME 768 676 1,444 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 678 944 1,622 AM-K FACTOR(%) 7.23 PM-K FACTOR(%) 8.12 AM-D(%) 64.74 35.26 100 PM-D(%) 41.8 58.2 100 NON COMMUTER PERIOD(09:00- DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 6-HR,12-HR,24-HR PERIODS DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL 15:00) TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK AM 6-HR PERIOD(06:00-12:00) 4,690 3,181 7,871 PEAK HR TIME 02:45 to 03:45 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD(00:00-12:00) 5,250 3,458 8,708 PEAK HR VOLUME 709 841 1,550 PM 6-HR PERIOD(12:00-18:00) 3,751 4,722 8,473 DIRECTIONAL PEAK PM 12-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 4,828 6,447 11,275 PEAK HR TIME 09:30 to 10:30 AM 02:45 to 03:45 PM 24-HR PERIOD(12:00-24:00) 10,078 9,905 19,983 PEAK HR VOLUME 806 841 D% 50.43 49.57 100 TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR TIME DIR -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -AM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DIR1 2 TOTAL -PM DI R1 2 TOTAL 12:00 06:00 12:00 06:00 8 15 23 - 172 71 243 - 164 174 338 - 89 151 240 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 12:15 06:15 10 11 21 - 163 100 263 - 168 167 335 - 84 162 246 12:30 1 1 06:30 12:30 1 1 1 06:30 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RCP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:42678,24 1/4 9/28/21,1:05 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out F 9Pr Rs 12:30 06:30 12:30 06:30 - 2 5 7 - 220 97 317 - 187 166 353 - 62 134 196 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 12:45 06:45 4 4 8 - 235 93 328 - 139 191 330 - 85 121 206 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 01:00 07:00 6 5 11 - 212 111 323 - 160 158 318 - 89 107 196 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 01:15 07:15 5 12 17 - 214 129 343 - 144 186 330 - 76 100 176 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 01:30 07:30 - 9 4 13 - 220 112 332 - 174 191 365 - 58 79 137 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 01:45 07:45 2 7 9 - 226 123 349 - 139 173 312 - 55 88 143 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 02:00 08:00 2 3 5 - 172 127 299 - 165 173 338 - 54 106 160 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 02:15 08:15 4 2 6 - 196 130 326 - 161 197 358 - 47 76 123 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 02:30 08:30 J 02:30 08:30 3 2 5 - 205 131 336 1 - 191 178 369 - 39 68 107 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 02:45 08:45 9 2 11 - 163 122 285 - 167 201 368 - 52 57 109 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 03:00 09:00 8 4 12 - 185 145 330 - 163 211 374 - 46 67 113 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 03:15 09:15 11 2 13 - 174 126 300 - 186 203 389 - 42 66 108 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 03:30 09:30 7 5 12 - 214 142 356 - 193 226 419 - 28 61 89 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 03:45 09:45 11 6 17 - 191 132 323 - 159 233 392 - 28 49 77 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:42678,24 2/4 9/28/21,1:05 PM 15 Minute Report HDOT RIMS Traffic Station Analyzer (v47) Log Out Rs 04:00 10:00 04:00 10:00 14 6 20 - 203 166 369 - 147 243 390 - 31 57 88 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 04:15 10:15 19 11 30 - 198 127 325 179 242 421 - 29 54 83 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 04:30 10:30 39 8 47 - 197 146 343 - 150 190 340 - 25 23 48 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 04:45 10:45 44 13 57 - 162 175 337 - 157 220 377 - 15 24 39 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 05:00 11:00 56 17 73 - 176 181 357 - 144 207 351 - 12 34 46 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 05:15 11:15 64 33 97 - 212 155 367 - 131 228 359 - 18 19 37 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 05:30 11:30 97 48 145 - 187 184 371 - 94 199 293 - 8 6 14 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 05:45 11:45 126 52 178 - 193 156 349 - 89 165 254 - 5 16 21 06:00 12:00 06:00 12:00 hwypdc07:8080/ords/f?p=101:8:7721092368135::NO:RP:P8_COUNT_NUMBER,P8_SU RVEY_DAY:42678,24 3/4 Appendix B — Bus Routes and Maps INTRA-KONA/COMBINED KONA BUS SCHEDULE Effective 05/15/2020 NORTHBOUND m oP o oQ ,F°°� ,F�'° ico .°\mm o�`'3 3°0`'° ,F°m\mmm ,F°\°a' 2"'�?�' 3F°'o ,F°a-T 4'v e<g Om-� 03:30AM P.h.1.SKR 5:OOAM 503A 505A 507A --- 520A --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 5:30AM 540A ---- --- --- --- -- Dally )6 15AM Kona Hilo ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 620A 515A 630A --- ___ ___ __ •6:45AM ___ ____ ___ 550A 555A -- *Mon-Sat 03:35AMHiloSKR Kona ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0#6:35AM ---- 540A ---- --- ---- ---- --- 545A ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -Mon-Sat 06:30AM Kona W aimea Ext ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- A6:45AM ---- ---- ---- ---- 555A ---- **Mon-Fri 05:40AM P.h.1.Kona 710A 712A ]:15AM 720A --- ]:30AM --- 745A 750A --- --- 810A 820A --- --- 8:08AM B:OOAM 8:15AM B:12AM --- --- --- 835A-Mon-Sat Intra Kona 1 --- --- 810A 8:15AM B:20AM 825A 835A B:40AM 8:45 AM 9:OOAM 905A 910A 925A 930A 940A 945A 9:50AM ___ ____ 955A 1000AM 1005AM — -MOn-Sat 08:OOAM P.h.1.SKR 920A 923A 9:25 AM 9:30AM --- 940A 950A 955A 10 OOAM --- 1005A --- --- --- -- 10:10AM 1020A ---- --- --- --- — Mon-Sat Intra Konal 12:OOPM 1205P 12:1OPM 1215P 1225P 12:3OPM 12 35P 12:5OPM 1255P 1:OOPM 115p 125P 1:3OPM 135P 140P 145P 1:5OPM -Mon-Sat 1:35PM Kona W aimea N.K.h.1. __ __ _ __ __ — -- 135P 1:50PM -- -- -- -- -- -- — 2:OOPM — 2:3OPM -- -- -- — *Mon-Fri Intra Kona2 1:40PM 1.45PM 1:5OPM 155P 205P 2:1OPM 215P 2:3OPM 235P 2:SOPM 255P 305P 3:1OPM 315P 320P 325P 3:3OPM -Mon-Sat 2:30PM Kona N.KOM1aIa -- -- — -- -- — -- 2:30PM 240P -- -- -- -- -- -- — 3:10PM ___ ____ 3:OOPM -- -- — -Saturday Intra Kona3 3:20PM 325P 3:3OPM 335P 3:50PM 355P 4:1OPM 415P 420P 435P 440P 4:5OPM 455P 5:OOPM 5:05PM 5:10PM 5:15PM fMon-Fri 4:OOPM Kona Hilo -- -- — -- -- — -- -- 413P -- 4:OOPM -- -- -- -- — 403P ___ ____ _- -- 420P Intra Kona2 5:35PM 540P 545P 5:5OPM 6:OOPM 605P 620P 6:25PM 635p 640P 645P 6:50PM 1655p **Mori-Sa[ Intra Kona3 -- -- 715P 720P 725P 1:3OPM -- 740P 745P 8:OOPM 8:OSPM -- -- -- -- — 8:10PM ___ ____ 815p 820P 8:25PM — -Mon-Fri SOUTHBOUND a 1 r a w . z e'3' �� °2° m`'� F° m P F 4�m F °o ? � ¢m m c r o` s�. r° 0 0 r.P� c°° 0 m l ¢ a ¢ A! 2a'�','cm\k° S 3 c k°� kms'°y°So t9F .°mom m ti Intra Kona l --- 630A -- 535A 640A •6:45AM -- — -- 555A 7:00 AM 7:10AM 712A 717A ]:30AM 735A 745A 750A a):55AM 8:10AM -- -- -Mon-Sat --- -- #6 45A21 -- ]:05AM --- 640A 0#6:35AM --- --- --- --- --- --- -- -- -Mon-Sat 03:35AM Hilo SKR Kona --- --- -- -- -- 08:10AMWaikVillageKonaExt --- --- -- 845A --- -- 9:OOAM --- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -Mon- 07 15AM SKR P.h.1. 830A 840A -- -- --- — 850A --- --- --- --- --- --- B:55AM 9:OOAM 910A --- 925A --- a9:30AM 940A 943A 945A Mon-Sat 06:45AM N.K.h.1. W aim Kona ___ ___ __ --- -- 930A --- --- 940A 950A --- -- --- --- --- --- -- -Mon-Fri Intra Konal -- --- 1005A -- 1010AM 1015AM 1020A 1025A 1040A 1045A 1055A 11 OOAM 1110A 11:12AM 11:17AM 11:30AM 11:35AM 11:45AM 11:50AM a11:55AM 12:OOPM --- -- -Mon-Sat 09:15AM N.K.h.1.Kona -- -- — — -- 11:25AM 1115AM -- — -- -- -- -- -- 11:30AM 11:45AM -- — -- -- -- -- — -Saturday 09:OOAM HiIO Kona -- 1135A — -- -- — 11:45AM -- — -- -- -- -- 11:50AM -- — -- — -- -- -- -- — -Mon-Sat Intra Kona2 --- --- 11:45AM -- 11:50AM 11:55AM 12:00PM 1205P 1220PM 1225P 1240P 1245P 1255P 1257PM 102P 115P — 125P 1:30PM a1.35PM 140P --- -- -Mon-Sat Intra Kona3 1:30PM 135P 140P 145P 2:0OPM 215P 220P 2:3OPM 2:32PM 2:37PM 2:5OPM 2:55PM 3:05PM 3:10PM a3.15PM 320P -Mon-Fri Intra Kona2 3:30PM 3:40PM 345P 3:5OPM 3:55PM 4:1OPM 415P 425P 4:3OPM 440P 4:42PM 4:47PM 5:OOPM 5:05PM 515P 5:20PM a5.25PM 5:3OPM -Mon-Sat 2:3OPM SKR P.h.1. -- 345P -- 3:50PM --- — 355p -- -- -- -- -- -- --- --- 4:1OPM --- 425P --- a4.30PM 440P 4:42PM 4:45PM DAILY 1:10PM Hilo Kona --- 4:15PM -- 420P — 425P -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4:3OPM 445P 4:40PM -- --- --- --- --- -- -Mon-Sat Intra K on . 5:30PM 5:35PM 140P 5:45PM 6:0OPM 601P 611P 6:30PM 6:32PM 6:37PM 6:SOPM ]:OOPM ]:05PM a'71OPM 715P -Mon-Fri 4:35PM Kona P.h.1. 435P 440P 515p 5:05PM 4:5OPM 5:OOPM 5:20PM 5:25PM 540P 555p B.00PM 6:1OPM 615P 620P-MOn-Sat ROUTE KEY BOLD=MORNINGS #6:45AM ri ders requesting to go to the HCC Palama Campust transfer at Keahuolu Courthouse to the 03:35 SKR Konat. a Kealakehe stops:Kamagaki public parking lot&Hwy 11/Konawa Rd bus shelters ---Service Not Available •6:45AM riders requesting to go to the West Hawaii Civic Center m ust transfer Keahuolu Courthouse to the Intra Kona 1 route b Kealakehe stops:Kona Hongwanji&Hwy l l/Konawaena Rd bus shelters "Does not Operate ^6:45AM ride requesting to go to Waim ea Park bus shelter m ust transfer at Keahuolu Courthouse On County Holidays to the Kona to Waimea Extension route cStop is roadside in front of ABC St/King Ka ha ha Hotel) Hele On - • - - #201 Intra Kona Legend n �' �®i �#201 Intra Kona j❑R Timepoint `�� •oHcc r.O j Q Transit Hub Kona Oil �• i uWaoa International o. •••••201•••• selected trips O Medical Facility Airpo L- Kaiminani D ® College/Universityack••����"""'•OMatsuya or J O S Q School201 •OLokahi =_ Hall • Aprs 0 p Key Destination SEE INSET 3 f ow w.heleonbus org schematic map-not to scale • : Kealakeh N • P S Intermediate L • Kealakehe 0 0 10161:1S INSET 4 Elementary 0 R Hin n R �: �• - �' KAILUA-KONA SEE INSET 2 OCostco 0 ° 9 Royal Sea Cliff Kona r •� Keauhou m?;: Sho ping F West v Hawaii O enter .� Ci-'c Q P O a Center a r L OKai r O• KEAUHOU ��• •� ICealakehe R G � SEE INSET 1 v � ONALO P NALIU 9 Sheraton O • m E •, °na Community Hospital Keauhou 05 me Konawaena ka/ei 'D OKMan 0 0� c 0 • ALAKEKUA °papa *:>- O Macy's e CAPTAIN COOK • �o Hall Kona s0 • hrWy laha R C Co O Kealakekua Bay F" walma •, 1 a �OOp O0 Qy 0 0 H�AU Target Place Place 4� � B Ku kini Hwy p J Kee e e 201 O A •O Fujiham Store Appendix C — Analysis Report Existing Conditions HCM 6th TWSC 2021 AM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/02/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 1 369 8 0 261 Future Vol,veh/h 12 1 369 8 0 261 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 23 23 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 82 82 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 2 450 10 0 314 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 792 478 0 0 483 0 Stage 1 478 - - - - - Stage 2 314 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 358 587 1080 Stage 1 624 - - Stage 2 741 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 350 574 1056 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 350 - - Stage 1 610 Stage 2 741 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 15.6 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 361 1056 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 - HCM Control Delay(s) 15.6 0 HCM Lane LOS C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2021 AM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/02/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 13.4 Intersection LOS B Movement WBL WBQmmmm,VBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 38 80 341 36 46 221 Future Vol,veh/h 38 80 341 36 46 221 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 50 105 421 44 61 291 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 9.9 15.1 12.6 HCM LOS A C B Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 17% Vol Thru, % 90% 0% 0% 83% Vol Right, % 10% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 377 38 80 267 LT Vol 0 38 0 46 Through Vol 341 0 0 221 RT Vol 36 0 80 0 Lane Flow Rate 465 50 105 351 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.613 0.097 0.169 0.482 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.738 6.99 5.77 4.944 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 754 516 625 720 Service Time 2.818 4.69 3.47 3.035 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.617 0.097 0.168 0.487 HCM Control Delay 15.1 10.4 9.6 12.6 HCM Lane LOS C B A B HCM 95th-tile Q 4.3 0.3 0.6 2.6 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2021 AM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/02/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 3.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL BL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 Future Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 4 0 2 2 0 4 3 0 1 1 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 42 42 42 50 50 50 38 38 38 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 6 0 0 10 2 0 2 2 0 0 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 16 0 0 8 0 0 30 28 9 28 27 18 Stage 1 - - - - - - 12 12 - 15 15 - Stage 2 - - 18 16 - 13 12 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1602 1612 979 865 1073 981 866 1061 Stage 1 - - 1009 886 - 1005 883 - Stage 2 - - 1001 882 - 1007 886 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1596 1609 966 859 1070 972 860 1054 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 966 859 - 972 860 - Stage 1 1006 883 1000 879 Stage 2 991 878 1001 883 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.5 0 8.8 8.4 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 953 1596 1609 1054 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 0.001 - 0.007 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.8 7.3 0 0 8.4 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 0 0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2021 AM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave I 09/02/2021 t I Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 107 23 26 690 628 55 Future Volume(veh/h) 107 23 26 690 628 55 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 145 0 27 726 698 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.74 0.74 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 493 326 1093 820 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.00 0.08 0.58 0.44 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 145 0 27 726 698 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 4.2 0.0 0.5 17.1 21.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 4.2 0.0 0.5 17.1 21.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 493 326 1093 820 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.08 0.66 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 493 326 1093 820 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 18.5 0.0 11.3 9.2 16.3 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 1.5 0.0 0.5 3.2 10.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.8 0.0 0.2 5.6 9.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.0 0.0 11.8 12.4 27.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C Approach Vol,veh/h 145 A 753 698 A Approach Delay,s/veh 20.0 12.3 27.2 Approach LOS C B C Timer-Assigned Phs 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 42.5 22.5 9.5 33.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 38.0 18.0 5.0 28.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 19.1 6.2 2.5 23.7 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 4.5 0.3 0.0 1.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.5 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2021 PM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/02/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 Movement WB R SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 9 8 327 19 5 381 Future Vol,veh/h 9 8 327 19 5 381 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 61 61 87 87 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 13 376 22 6 428 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 828 388 0 0 399 0 Stage 1 388 - - - - - Stage 2 440 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 341 660 1160 Stage 1 686 - - Stage 2 649 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 338 659 1159 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 338 - - Stage 1 685 Stage 2 644 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 13.8 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 439 1159 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.063 0.005 HCM Control Delay(s) 13.8 8.1 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2021 PM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/02/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 14.1 Intersection LOS B Movement Am "JBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 1� 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 49 76 307 32 76 331 Future Vol,veh/h 49 76 307 32 76 331 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 60 93 357 37 86 376 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 10 13.5 15.9 HCM LOS A B C Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 19% Vol Thru, % 91% 0% 0% 81% Vol Right, % 9% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 339 49 76 407 LT Vol 0 49 0 76 Through Vol 307 0 0 331 RT Vol 32 0 76 0 Lane Flow Rate 394 60 93 462 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.533 0.118 0.151 0.626 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.864 7.09 5.868 4.874 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 733 509 614 731 Service Time 2.959 4.79 3.568 2.966 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.538 0.118 0.151 0.632 HCM Control Delay 13.5 10.7 9.6 15.9 HCM Lane LOS B B A C HCM 95th-tile Q 3.2 0.4 0.5 4.4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2021 PM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/02/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 2.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL NBT NBR- SBF Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Future Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 67 67 67 25 25 25 25 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 19 3 0 10 1 0 0 0 4 0 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor Conflicting Flow All 13 0 0 22 0 0 47 46 21 46 47 14 Stage 1 - - - - - - 33 33 - 13 13 - Stage 2 - - 14 13 - 33 34 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1606 1593 954 846 1056 955 845 1066 Stage 1 - - 983 868 - 1007 885 - Stage 2 - - 1006 885 - 983 867 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1603 1593 946 841 1056 950 840 1063 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 946 841 - 950 840 - Stage 1 979 865 1001 883 Stage 2 1001 883 979 864 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.6 0 0 8.6 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 1603 1593 1003 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.008 HCM Control Delay(s) 0 7.3 0 0 8.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 0 0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2021 PM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave II 09/02/2021 t t Movement EB � "R NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 81 19 40 840 775 96 Future Volume(veh/h) 81 19 40 840 775 96 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 107 0 46 966 852 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 428 283 1197 960 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.00 0.07 0.64 0.51 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 107 0 46 966 852 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 3.6 0.0 0.8 28.8 30.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 3.6 0.0 0.8 28.8 30.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 428 283 1197 960 V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.16 0.81 0.89 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 428 283 1197 960 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 23.0 0.0 13.6 10.1 16.3 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 1.4 0.0 1.2 5.9 12.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.7 0.0 0.4 9.8 13.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 0.0 14.8 15.9 28.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C Approach Vol,veh/h 107 A 1012 852 A Approach Delay,s/veh 24.4 15.9 28.3 Approach LOS C B C Timer-Assigned Phs PEMW 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 52.5 22.5 9.5 43.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 48.0 18.0 5.0 38.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 30.8 5.6 2.8 32.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 6.5 0.2 0.0 2.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.7 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Appendix D — Analysis Report Future Without Project Conditions HCM 6th TWSC 2026 Without Project AM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 1 403 8 0 283 Future Vol,veh/h 12 1 403 8 0 283 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 23 23 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 82 82 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 2 491 10 0 341 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 860 519 0 0 524 0 Stage 1 519 - - - - - Stage 2 341 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 326 557 1043 Stage 1 597 - - Stage 2 720 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 319 545 1020 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 319 - - Stage 1 584 Stage 2 720 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 16.6 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 330 1020 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 - HCM Control Delay(s) 16.6 0 HCM Lane LOS C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2026 Without Project AM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 15 Intersection LOS B Movement WBL WBPmm=,,VBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 39 81 373 37 47 239 Future Vol,veh/h 39 81 373 37 47 239 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 51 107 460 46 62 314 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 10.2 17.4 13.8 HCM LOS B C B Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 16% Vol Thru, % 91% 0% 0% 84% Vol Right, % 9% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 410 39 81 286 LT Vol 0 39 0 47 Through Vol 373 0 0 239 RT Vol 37 0 81 0 Lane Flow Rate 506 51 107 376 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.673 0.102 0.176 0.535 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.895 7.152 5.93 5.114 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 744 503 607 711 Service Time 2.895 4.869 3.646 3.114 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.68 0.101 0.176 0.529 HCM Control Delay 17.4 10.7 9.9 13.8 HCM Lane LOS C B A B HCM 95th-tile Q 5.3 0.3 0.6 3.2 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2026 Without Project AM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 6.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL BL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 11 1 0 3 3 Future Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 11 1 0 3 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 4 0 2 2 0 4 3 0 1 1 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 42 42 42 50 50 50 38 38 38 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 6 0 0 10 2 0 22 2 0 8 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 16 0 0 8 0 0 34 28 9 38 27 18 Stage 1 - - - - - - 12 12 - 15 15 - Stage 2 - - 22 16 - 23 12 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1602 1612 973 865 1073 967 866 1061 Stage 1 - - 1009 886 - 1005 883 - Stage 2 - - 996 882 - 995 886 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1596 1609 954 859 1070 941 860 1054 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 954 859 - 941 860 - Stage 1 1006 883 1000 879 Stage 2 977 878 967 883 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.5 0 9.2 8.9 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 873 1596 1609 947 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 0.001 - 0.017 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.2 7.3 0 0 8.9 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0 0.1 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2026 Without Project AM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave I 09/03/2021 t I Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 116 25 28 751 694 58 Future Volume(veh/h) 116 25 28 751 694 58 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 157 0 29 791 771 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.74 0.74 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 458 309 1149 895 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.00 0.07 0.61 0.48 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 157 0 29 791 771 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 5.0 0.0 0.5 19.8 25.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 5.0 0.0 0.5 19.8 25.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 458 309 1149 895 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.09 0.69 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 458 309 1149 895 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 21.2 0.0 12.0 9.0 16.2 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 2.0 0.0 0.6 3.4 10.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.3 0.0 0.2 6.5 11.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.2 0.0 12.6 12.4 26.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C Approach Vol,veh/h 157 A 820 771 A Approach Delay,s/veh 23.2 12.4 26.9 Approach LOS C B C Timer-Assigned Phs 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 47.5 22.5 9.5 38.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 43.0 18.0 5.0 33.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 21.8 7.0 2.5 27.6 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 5.3 0.3 0.0 2.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.8 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2026 Without Project AM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 Movement BR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 4 6 406 2 2 294 Future Vol,veh/h 4 6 406 2 2 294 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 7 441 2 2 320 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 766 442 0 0 443 0 Stage 1 442 - - - - - Stage 2 324 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 371 615 1117 Stage 1 648 - - Stage 2 733 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 370 615 1117 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 370 - - Stage 1 648 Stage 2 732 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 12.6 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 486 1117 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 0.002 HCM Control Delay(s) 12.6 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2026 Without Project PM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 Movement WB BR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 9 8 356 19 5 416 Future Vol,veh/h 9 8 356 19 5 416 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 61 61 87 87 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 13 409 22 6 467 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 900 421 0 0 432 0 Stage 1 421 - - - - - Stage 2 479 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 309 632 1128 Stage 1 662 - - Stage 2 623 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 307 631 1127 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 307 - - Stage 1 661 Stage 2 619 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 14.5 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 405 1127 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.069 0.005 HCM Control Delay(s) 14.5 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2026 Without Project PM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 16.7 Intersection LOS C Movement WBL WBPmm=,,VBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 55 83 329 41 81 362 Future Vol,veh/h 55 83 329 41 81 362 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 67 101 383 48 92 411 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 10.5 15.6 19.8 HCM LOS B C C Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 18% Vol Thru, % 89% 0% 0% 82% Vol Right, % 11% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 370 55 83 443 LT Vol 0 55 0 81 Through Vol 329 0 0 362 RT Vol 41 0 83 0 Lane Flow Rate 430 67 101 503 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.606 0.136 0.171 0.714 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.074 7.295 6.071 5.106 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 710 492 590 715 Service Time 3.106 5.04 3.815 3.106 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.606 0.136 0.171 0.703 HCM Control Delay 15.6 11.2 10.1 19.8 HCM Lane LOS C B B C HCM 95th-tile Q 4.1 0.5 0.6 6 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2026 Without Project PM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 6.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL NBT NBR- SBF Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 5 0 1 10 1 Future Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 5 0 1 10 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 67 67 67 25 25 25 25 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 19 3 0 10 1 0 20 0 4 40 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor Conflicting Flow All 13 0 0 22 0 0 67 46 21 56 47 14 Stage 1 - - - - - - 33 33 - 13 13 - Stage 2 - - 34 13 - 43 34 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1606 1593 926 846 1056 941 845 1066 Stage 1 - - 983 868 - 1007 885 - Stage 2 - - 982 885 - 971 867 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1603 1593 885 841 1056 919 840 1063 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 885 841 - 919 840 - Stage 1 979 865 1001 883 Stage 2 933 883 945 864 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.6 0 9.4 9.4 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 841 1603 1593 861 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.004 - 0.056 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.4 7.3 0 0 9.4 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0 0.2 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2026 Without Project PM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 93 23 44 934 842 110 Future Volume(veh/h) 93 23 44 934 842 110 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 122 0 51 1074 925 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 401 260 1239 1017 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.00 0.06 0.66 0.54 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 122 0 51 1074 925 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 4.6 0.0 0.9 36.4 35.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 4.6 0.0 0.9 36.4 35.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 401 260 1239 1017 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.20 0.87 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 401 260 1239 1017 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 15.3 10.7 16.5 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 2.0 0.0 1.7 8.3 13.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.1 0.0 0.5 12.8 15.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.7 0.0 17.0 19.0 29.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C Approach Vol,veh/h 122 A 1125 925 A Approach Delay,s/veh 27.7 18.9 29.9 Approach LOS C B C Timer-Assigned Phs 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 57.5 22.5 9.5 48.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 53.0 18.0 5.0 43.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 38.4 6.6 2.9 37.7 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 7.0 0.2 0.0 3.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.1 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2026 Without Project PM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 3 4 372 4 6 420 Future Vol,veh/h 3 4 372 4 6 420 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 4 404 4 7 457 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 877 406 0 0 408 0 Stage 1 406 - - - - - Stage 2 471 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 319 645 1151 Stage 1 673 - - Stage 2 628 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 316 645 1151 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 316 - - Stage 1 673 Stage 2 623 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 13.2 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 446 1151 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 0.006 HCM Control Delay(s) 13.2 8.1 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 Without Project AM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 1 438 8 0 305 Future Vol,veh/h 12 1 438 8 0 305 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 23 23 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 82 82 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 2 534 10 0 367 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 929 562 0 0 567 0 Stage 1 562 - - - - - Stage 2 367 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 297 526 1005 Stage 1 571 - - Stage 2 701 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 290 514 983 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 290 - - Stage 1 558 Stage 2 701 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 17.9 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 300 983 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 - HCM Control Delay(s) 17.9 0 HCM Lane LOS C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2031 Without Project AM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 17.5 Intersection LOS C Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 39 81 406 37 47 259 Future Vol,veh/h 39 81 406 37 47 259 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 51 107 501 46 62 341 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 10.4 21.4 15.1 HCM LOS B C C Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 15% Vol Thru, % 92% 0% 0% 85% Vol Right, % 8% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 443 39 81 306 LT Vol 0 39 0 47 Through Vol 406 0 0 259 RT Vol 37 0 81 0 Lane Flow Rate 547 51 107 403 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.752 0.104 0.18 0.578 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.951 7.315 6.091 5.171 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 733 490 588 697 Service Time 2.951 5.058 3.833 3.199 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.746 0.104 0.182 0.578 HCM Control Delay 21.4 10.9 10.2 15.1 HCM Lane LOS C B B C HCM 95th-tile Q 7 0.3 0.7 3.7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 Without Project AM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL BL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 18 1 0 5 3 Future Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 18 1 0 5 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 4 0 2 2 0 4 3 0 1 1 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 42 42 42 50 50 50 38 38 38 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 6 0 0 10 2 0 36 2 0 13 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 16 0 0 8 0 0 37 28 9 45 27 18 Stage 1 - - - - - - 12 12 - 15 15 - Stage 2 - - 25 16 - 30 12 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1602 1612 968 865 1073 957 866 1061 Stage 1 - - 1009 886 - 1005 883 - Stage 2 - - 993 882 - 987 886 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1596 1609 945 859 1070 920 860 1054 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 945 859 - 920 860 - Stage 1 1006 883 1000 879 Stage 2 968 878 943 883 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.5 0 9.3 9 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 868 1596 1609 924 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 0.001 - 0.023 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.3 7.3 0 0 9 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0 0.1 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2031 Without Project AM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 122 26 29 814 760 60 Future Volume(veh/h) 122 26 29 814 760 60 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 165 0 31 857 844 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.74 0.74 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 428 289 1197 960 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.00 0.07 0.64 0.51 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 165 0 31 857 844 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 5.8 0.0 0.5 22.8 30.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 5.8 0.0 0.5 22.8 30.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 428 289 1197 960 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.11 0.72 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 428 289 1197 960 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 23.9 0.0 13.1 9.0 16.2 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 2.6 0.0 0.7 3.7 11.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.7 0.0 0.2 7.5 13.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.5 0.0 13.8 12.7 27.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C Approach Vol,veh/h 165 A 888 844 A Approach Delay,s/veh 26.5 12.7 27.5 Approach LOS C B C Timer-Assigned Phs 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 52.5 22.5 9.5 43.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 48.0 18.0 5.0 38.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 24.8 7.8 2.5 32.0 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 6.1 0.3 0.0 2.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.5 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 Without Project AM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.3 Movement NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 7 11 437 3 3 316 Future Vol,veh/h 7 11 437 3 3 316 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 12 475 3 3 343 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 826 477 0 0 478 0 Stage 1 477 - - - - - Stage 2 349 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 342 588 1084 Stage 1 624 - - Stage 2 714 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 341 588 1084 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 341 - - Stage 1 624 Stage 2 712 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 13.2 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 459 1084 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.043 0.003 HCM Control Delay(s) 13.2 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 Without Project PM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 Movement WB BR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 9 8 386 19 5 451 Future Vol,veh/h 9 8 386 19 5 451 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 61 61 87 87 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 13 444 22 6 507 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 975 456 0 0 467 0 Stage 1 456 - - - - - Stage 2 519 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 279 604 1094 Stage 1 638 - - Stage 2 597 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 276 603 1093 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 276 - - Stage 1 637 Stage 2 592 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 15.5 0 0.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 371 1093 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.075 0.005 HCM Control Delay(s) 15.5 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2031 Without Project PM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 19.2 Intersection LOS C Movement WBL WBPmm=,,VBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 55 83 357 41 81 393 Future Vol,veh/h 55 83 357 41 81 393 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 67 101 415 48 92 447 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 10.7 17.7 23.2 HCM LOS B C C Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 17% Vol Thru, % 90% 0% 0% 83% Vol Right, % 10% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 398 55 83 474 LT Vol 0 55 0 81 Through Vol 357 0 0 393 RT Vol 41 0 83 0 Lane Flow Rate 463 67 101 539 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.662 0.139 0.175 0.769 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.146 7.46 6.234 5.142 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 703 481 575 706 Service Time 3.177 5.206 3.979 3.171 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.659 0.139 0.176 0.763 HCM Control Delay 17.7 11.4 10.3 23.2 HCM Lane LOS C B B C HCM 95th-tile Q 5 0.5 0.6 7.3 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 Without Project PM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 7.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 8 0 1 17 1 Future Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 8 0 1 17 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 67 67 67 25 25 25 25 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 19 3 0 10 1 0 32 0 4 68 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor Conflicting Flow All 13 0 0 22 0 0 81 46 21 62 47 14 Stage 1 - - - - - - 33 33 - 13 13 - Stage 2 - - 48 13 - 49 34 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1606 1593 907 846 1056 933 845 1066 Stage 1 - - 983 868 - 1007 885 - Stage 2 - - 965 885 - 964 867 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1603 1593 844 841 1056 901 840 1063 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 844 841 - 901 840 - Stage 1 979 865 1001 883 Stage 2 886 883 925 864 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.6 0 9.5 9.6 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 841 1603 1593 852 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 0.004 - 0.089 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.5 7.3 0 0 9.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0 0.3 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2031 Without Project PM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 96 24 46 1026 913 115 Future Volume(veh/h) 96 24 46 1026 913 115 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 126 0 53 1179 1003 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 356 249 1309 1112 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.00 0.06 0.70 0.59 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 126 0 53 1179 1003 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 5.5 0.0 0.9 46.0 42.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 5.5 0.0 0.9 46.0 42.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 356 249 1309 1112 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.21 0.90 0.90 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 356 249 1309 1112 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 31.0 0.0 17.0 11.0 16.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 2.7 0.0 1.9 10.1 11.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.6 0.0 0.6 16.2 17.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.7 0.0 18.9 21.1 27.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B C C Approach Vol,veh/h 126 A 1232 1003 A Approach Delay,s/veh 33.7 21.0 27.7 Approach LOS C C C Timer-Assigned Phs I 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 67.5 22.5 9.5 58.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 63.0 18.0 5.0 53.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 48.0 7.5 2.9 44.2 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 8.2 0.2 0.0 4.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.5 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 Without Project PM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection - Int Delay,s/veh 0.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 7 401 7 10 452 Future Vol,veh/h 5 7 401 7 10 452 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 8 436 8 11 491 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 953 440 0 0 444 0 Stage 1 440 - - - - - Stage 2 513 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 287 617 1116 Stage 1 649 - - Stage 2 601 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 283 617 1116 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 283 - - Stage 1 649 Stage 2 593 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 14 0 0.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 414 1116 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.032 0.01 HCM Control Delay(s) 14 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Roundabout 2041 Without Project AM Roundabout 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 7.2 Intersection LOS A Approach NB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow,veh/h 158 624 455 Demand Flow Rate,veh/h 161 637 464 Vehicles Circulating,veh/h 590 63 52 Vehicles Exiting,veh/h 110 453 699 Ped Vol Crossing Leg,#/h 24 3 0 Ped Cap Adj 0.997 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay,s/veh 7.3 8.0 6.1 Approach LOS A A A Lane IMF— Left Left i Designated Moves LR TR LT Assumed Moves LR TR LT RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway,s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway,s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow,veh/h 161 637 464 Cap Entry Lane,veh/h 756 1294 1309 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.981 0.980 0.981 Flow Entry,veh/h 158 624 455 Cap Entry,veh/h 739 1268 1284 V/C Ratio 0.214 0.492 0.355 Control Delay,s/veh 7.3 8.0 6.1 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue,veh 1 3 2 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2041 Without Project AM Signalized 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t i Movement OT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 1� *' Traffic Volume(veh/h) 39 81 468 37 47 299 Future Volume(veh/h) 39 81 468 37 47 299 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 51 107 578 46 62 393 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.76 0.76 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 583 519 867 69 130 697 Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1702 135 109 1370 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 51 107 0 624 455 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 0 1838 1478 0 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 2.7 0.0 13.9 1.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 2.7 0.0 13.9 15.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 583 519 0 935 827 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.21 0.00 0.67 0.55 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 583 519 0 935 827 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 12.8 13.3 0.0 10.0 8.9 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.3 0.9 0.0 3.8 2.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.4 1.0 0.0 5.3 3.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.1 14.2 0.0 13.8 11.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A B B A Approach Vol,veh/h 158 624 455 Approach Delay,s/veh 13.9 13.8 11.6 Approach LOS B B B Timer-Assigned Phs 2 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 32.5 32.5 22.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 28.0 28.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 15.9 17.4 4.7 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 3.4 2.3 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.0 HCM 6th LOS B Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 Without Project AM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 1 506 8 0 353 Future Vol,veh/h 12 1 506 8 0 353 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 23 23 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 82 82 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 2 617 10 0 425 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1070 645 0 0 650 0 Stage 1 645 - - - - - Stage 2 425 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 245 472 936 Stage 1 522 - - Stage 2 659 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 240 462 915 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 240 - - Stage 1 511 Stage 2 659 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 20.7 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 249 915 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.08 - HCM Control Delay(s) 20.7 0 HCM Lane LOS C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2041 Without Project AM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 24.6 Intersection LOS C Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 39 81 468 37 47 299 Future Vol,veh/h 39 81 468 37 47 299 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 51 107 578 46 62 393 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 10.8 32.5 18.5 HCM LOS B D C Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 14% Vol Thru, % 93% 0% 0% 86% Vol Right, % 7% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 505 39 81 346 LT Vol 0 39 0 47 Through Vol 468 0 0 299 RT Vol 37 0 81 0 Lane Flow Rate 623 51 107 455 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.873 0.109 0.189 0.671 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.042 7.625 6.397 5.305 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 717 470 560 683 Service Time 3.073 5.376 4.147 3.339 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.869 0.109 0.191 0.666 HCM Control Delay 32.5 11.3 10.6 18.5 HCM Lane LOS D I B C HCM 95th-tile Q 10.6 0.4 0.7 5.2 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 Without Project AM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL BL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 18 1 0 5 3 Future Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 18 1 0 5 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 4 0 2 2 0 4 3 0 1 1 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 42 42 42 50 50 50 38 38 38 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 6 0 0 10 2 0 36 2 0 13 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 16 0 0 8 0 0 37 28 9 45 27 18 Stage 1 - - - - - - 12 12 - 15 15 - Stage 2 - - 25 16 - 30 12 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1602 1612 968 865 1073 957 866 1061 Stage 1 - - 1009 886 - 1005 883 - Stage 2 - - 993 882 - 987 886 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1596 1609 945 859 1070 920 860 1054 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 945 859 - 920 860 - Stage 1 1006 883 1000 879 Stage 2 968 878 943 883 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.5 0 9.3 9 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 868 1596 1609 924 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 0.001 - 0.023 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.3 7.3 0 0 9 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0 0.1 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2041 Without Project AM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 122 26 29 941 875 60 Future Volume(veh/h) 122 26 29 941 875 60 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 165 0 31 991 972 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.74 0.74 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 356 269 1309 1112 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.00 0.06 0.70 0.59 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 165 0 31 991 972 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 7.4 0.0 0.5 30.4 39.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 7.4 0.0 0.5 30.4 39.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 356 269 1309 1112 V/C Ratio(X) 0.46 0.12 0.76 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 356 269 1309 1112 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 31.7 0.0 15.0 8.6 15.4 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 4.3 0.0 0.9 4.1 9.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.6 0.0 0.3 9.8 16.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 36.0 0.0 15.9 12.7 25.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B B C Approach Vol,veh/h 165 A 1022 972 A Approach Delay,s/veh 36.0 12.8 25.0 Approach LOS D B C Timer-Assigned Phs 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 67.5 22.5 9.5 58.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 63.0 18.0 5.0 53.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 32.4 9.4 2.5 41.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 8.6 0.3 0.0 5.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.1 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 Without Project AM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.3 Movement NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 1� 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 7 11 506 3 3 366 Future Vol,veh/h 7 11 506 3 3 366 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 12 550 3 3 398 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 956 552 0 0 553 0 Stage 1 552 - - - - - Stage 2 404 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 286 533 1017 Stage 1 577 - - Stage 2 674 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 285 533 1017 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 285 - - Stage 1 577 Stage 2 671 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 14.5 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 398 1017 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.049 0.003 HCM Control Delay(s) 14.5 8.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Roundabout 2041 Without Project PM Roundabout 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 7.5 Intersection LOS A Approach SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow,veh/h 168 527 608 Demand Flow Rate,veh/h 171 538 620 Vehicles Circulating,veh/h 489 94 68 Vehicles Exiting,veh/h 143 594 592 Ped Vol Crossing Leg,#/h 6 1 0 Ped Cap Adj 0.999 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay,s/veh 6.5 7.3 7.9 Approach LOS A A A Lane IMF— Left Left Designated Moves LR TR LT Assumed Moves LR TR LT RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway,s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway,s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow,veh/h 171 538 620 Cap Entry Lane,veh/h 838 1254 1287 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.982 0.980 0.980 Flow Entry,veh/h 168 527 608 Cap Entry,veh/h 823 1229 1262 V/C Ratio 0.204 0.429 0.482 Control Delay,s/veh 6.5 7.3 7.9 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue,veh 1 2 3 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2041 Without Project PM Signalized 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t i Movement WB BRA SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 55 83 412 41 81 454 Future Volume(veh/h) 55 83 412 41 81 454 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 67 101 479 48 92 516 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 534 476 917 92 158 771 Arrive On Green 0.30 0.30 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1667 167 162 1401 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 67 101 0 527 608 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 0 1834 1563 0 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.6 2.9 0.0 10.9 6.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.6 2.9 0.0 10.9 17.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.09 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 534 476 0 1009 929 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.21 0.00 0.52 0.65 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 534 476 0 1009 929 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 15.3 15.7 0.0 8.5 9.7 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.9 3.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 1.1 0.0 3.9 5.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.8 16.7 0.0 10.5 13.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A B B A Approach Vol,veh/h 168 527 608 Approach Delay,s/veh 16.3 10.5 13.3 Approach LOS B B B Timer-Assigned Phs 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 37.5 37.5 22.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 33.0 33.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 12.9 19.7 4.9 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 3.4 3.7 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.5 HCM 6th LOS B Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 Without Project PM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 Movement WB BR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 9 8 446 19 5 521 Future Vol,veh/h 9 8 446 19 5 521 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 61 61 87 87 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 13 513 22 6 585 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1122 525 0 0 536 0 Stage 1 525 - - - - - Stage 2 597 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 228 552 1032 Stage 1 593 - - Stage 2 550 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 226 551 1031 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 226 - - Stage 1 592 Stage 2 545 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 17.6 0 0.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 313 1031 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.089 0.005 HCM Control Delay(s) 17.6 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2041 Without Project PM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 27.8 Intersection LOS D Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 55 83 412 41 81 454 Future Vol,veh/h 55 83 412 41 81 454 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 67 101 479 48 92 516 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 11.2 24.1 35.7 HCM LOS B C E Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 15% Vol Thru, % 91% 0% 0% 85% Vol Right, % 9% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 453 55 83 535 LT Vol 0 55 0 81 Through Vol 412 0 0 454 RT Vol 41 0 83 0 Lane Flow Rate 527 67 101 608 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.774 0.145 0.184 0.889 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.289 7.78 6.55 5.265 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 685 460 547 687 Service Time 3.33 5.541 4.31 3.304 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.769 0.146 0.185 0.885 HCM Control Delay 24.1 11.9 10.8 35.7 HCM Lane LOS M B B E HCM 95th-tile Q 7.4 0.5 0.7 11.1 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 Without Project PM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 7.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 8 0 1 17 1 Future Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 8 0 1 17 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 67 67 67 25 25 25 25 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 19 3 0 10 1 0 32 0 4 68 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor Conflicting Flow All 13 0 0 22 0 0 81 46 21 62 47 14 Stage 1 - - - - - - 33 33 - 13 13 - Stage 2 - - 48 13 - 49 34 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1606 1593 907 846 1056 933 845 1066 Stage 1 - - 983 868 - 1007 885 - Stage 2 - - 965 885 - 964 867 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1603 1593 844 841 1056 901 840 1063 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 844 841 - 901 840 - Stage 1 979 865 1001 883 Stage 2 886 883 925 864 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.6 0 9.5 9.6 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 841 1603 1593 852 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 0.004 - 0.089 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.5 7.3 0 0 9.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0 0.3 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2041 Without Project PM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 96 24 46 1180 1055 115 Future Volume(veh/h) 96 24 46 1180 1055 115 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 126 0 53 1356 1159 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 321 181 1365 1188 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.00 0.05 0.73 0.63 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 126 0 53 1356 1159 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 6.2 0.0 0.9 71.2 59.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 6.2 0.0 0.9 71.2 59.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 321 181 1365 1188 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.29 0.99 0.98 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 321 181 1365 1188 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 36.2 0.0 25.2 13.3 17.5 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 3.6 0.0 4.1 22.8 20.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.0 0.0 1.0 28.0 26.9 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.8 0.0 29.3 36.0 38.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D D Approach Vol,veh/h 126 A 1409 1159 A Approach Delay,s/veh 39.8 35.8 38.4 Approach LOS D D D Timer-Assigned Phs 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 77.5 22.5 9.5 68.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 73.0 18.0 5.0 63.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 73.2 8.2 2.9 61.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 37.1 HCM 6th LOS D Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 Without Project PM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection _ Int Delay,s/veh 0.3 Movement WBL WBR NBT _ SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 7 464 7 10 523 Future Vol,veh/h 5 7 464 7 10 523 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 8 504 8 11 568 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1098 508 0 0 512 0 Stage 1 508 - - - - - Stage 2 590 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 235 565 1053 Stage 1 604 - - Stage 2 554 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 231 565 1053 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 231 - - Stage 1 604 Stage 2 546 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 15.6 0 0.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 353 1053 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 0.01 HCM Control Delay(s) 15.6 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Appendix E — Analysis Report Future With Project Conditions HCM 6th TWSC 2026 With Project AM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 1 415 8 0 286 Future Vol,veh/h 12 1 415 8 0 286 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 23 23 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 82 82 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 2 506 10 0 345 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 879 534 0 0 539 0 Stage 1 534 - - - - - Stage 2 345 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 318 546 1029 Stage 1 588 - - Stage 2 717 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 311 534 1006 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 311 - - Stage 1 575 Stage 2 717 Approach W� NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 17 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 321 1006 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 - HCM Control Delay(s) 17 0 HCM Lane LOS C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2026 With Project AM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 15.6 Intersection LOS C Movement WBL WBQmmmm,VBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 39 81 385 37 47 243 Future Vol,veh/h 39 81 385 37 47 243 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 51 107 475 46 62 320 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 10.2 18.3 14.1 HCM LOS B C B Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 16% Vol Thru, % 91% 0% 0% 84% Vol Right, % 9% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 422 39 81 290 LT Vol 0 39 0 47 Through Vol 385 0 0 243 RT Vol 37 0 81 0 Lane Flow Rate 521 51 107 382 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.695 0.103 0.177 0.545 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.909 7.201 5.978 5.138 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 740 499 602 706 Service Time 2.909 4.919 3.696 3.138 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.704 0.102 0.178 0.541 HCM Control Delay 18.3 10.7 10 14.1 HCM Lane LOS C B A B HCM 95th-tile Q 5.7 0.3 0.6 3.3 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2026 With Project AM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 7.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL BL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 29 1 0 9 3 Future Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 29 1 0 9 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 4 0 2 2 0 4 3 0 1 1 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 42 42 42 50 50 50 38 38 38 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 6 0 0 10 2 0 58 2 0 24 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 16 0 0 8 0 0 42 28 9 56 27 18 Stage 1 - - - - - - 12 12 - 15 15 - Stage 2 - - 30 16 - 41 12 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1602 1612 961 865 1073 941 866 1061 Stage 1 - - 1009 886 - 1005 883 - Stage 2 - - 987 882 - 974 886 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1596 1609 928 859 1070 885 860 1054 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 928 859 - 885 860 - Stage 1 1006 883 1000 879 Stage 2 950 878 907 883 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.5 0 9.5 9.1 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 865 1596 1609 901 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.069 0.001 - 0.035 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.5 7.3 0 0 9.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 0 0.1 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2026 With Project AM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t t Movement EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 131 28 30 751 694 62 Future Volume(veh/h) 131 28 30 751 694 62 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 177 0 32 791 771 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.74 0.74 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 458 309 1149 895 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.00 0.07 0.61 0.48 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 177 0 32 791 771 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 5.7 0.0 0.5 19.8 25.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 5.7 0.0 0.5 19.8 25.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 458 309 1149 895 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.10 0.69 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 458 309 1149 895 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 21.4 0.0 12.0 9.0 16.2 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 2.5 0.0 0.7 3.4 10.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.6 0.0 0.2 6.5 11.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.9 0.0 12.7 12.4 26.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C Approach Vol,veh/h 177 A 823 771 A Approach Delay,s/veh 23.9 12.4 26.9 Approach LOS C B C Timer-Assigned Phs 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 47.5 22.5 9.5 38.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 43.0 18.0 5.0 33.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 21.8 7.7 2.5 27.6 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 5.3 0.3 0.0 2.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.9 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2026 With Project AM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 Movement BR SBL SBT Lane Configurations i 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 11 18 406 5 5 294 Future Vol,veh/h 11 18 406 5 5 294 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 20 441 5 5 320 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 774 444 0 0 446 0 Stage 1 444 - - - - - Stage 2 330 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 367 614 1114 Stage 1 646 - - Stage 2 728 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 365 614 1114 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 365 - - Stage 1 646 Stage 2 724 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 12.9 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 488 1114 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.065 0.005 HCM Control Delay(s) 12.9 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2026 With Project PM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 Movement WB BR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 9 8 364 19 5 428 Future Vol,veh/h 9 8 364 19 5 428 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 61 61 87 87 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 13 418 22 6 481 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 923 430 0 0 441 0 Stage 1 430 - - - - - Stage 2 493 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 299 625 1119 Stage 1 656 - - Stage 2 614 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 297 624 1118 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 297 - - Stage 1 655 Stage 2 610 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 14.8 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 394 1118 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.071 0.005 HCM Control Delay(s) 14.8 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2026 With Project PM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 17.6 Intersection LOS C Movement WBL WBQmmmm,VBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 55 83 338 41 81 374 Future Vol,veh/h 55 83 338 41 81 374 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 67 101 393 48 92 425 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 10.6 16.3 20.9 HCM LOS B C C Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 18% Vol Thru, % 89% 0% 0% 82% Vol Right, % 11% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 379 55 83 455 LT Vol 0 55 0 81 Through Vol 338 0 0 374 RT Vol 41 0 83 0 Lane Flow Rate 441 67 101 517 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.625 0.137 0.172 0.733 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.102 7.353 6.128 5.101 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 710 488 585 708 Service Time 3.13 5.097 3.872 3.128 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.621 0.137 0.173 0.73 HCM Control Delay 16.3 11.3 10.1 20.9 HCM Lane LOS C I B C HCM 95th-tile Q 4.4 0.5 0.6 6.5 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2026 With Project PM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection - Int Delay,s/veh 8.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL NBT NBSBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 15 0 1 30 1 Future Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 15 0 1 30 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 67 67 67 25 25 25 25 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 19 3 0 10 1 0 60 0 4 120 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor Conflicting Flow All 13 0 0 22 0 0 107 46 21 76 47 14 Stage 1 - - - - - - 33 33 - 13 13 - Stage 2 - - 74 13 - 63 34 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1606 1593 872 846 1056 914 845 1066 Stage 1 - - 983 868 - 1007 885 - Stage 2 - - 935 885 - 948 867 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1603 1593 771 841 1056 860 840 1063 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 771 841 - 860 840 - Stage 1 979 865 1001 883 Stage 2 804 883 879 864 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.6 0 9.6 10 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 841 1603 1593 846 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.071 0.004 - 0.151 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.6 7.3 0 0 =10 HCM Lane LOS A A A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2026 With Project PM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave I 09/03/2021 t I Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 101 25 50 934 842 124 Future Volume(veh/h) 101 25 50 934 842 124 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 133 0 57 1074 925 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 401 260 1239 1017 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.00 0.06 0.66 0.54 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 133 0 57 1074 925 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 5.0 0.0 1.0 36.4 35.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 5.0 0.0 1.0 36.4 35.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 401 260 1239 1017 V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.22 0.87 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 401 260 1239 1017 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 26.0 0.0 15.4 10.7 16.5 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 2.2 0.0 1.9 8.3 13.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.3 0.0 0.6 12.8 15.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.2 0.0 17.4 19.0 29.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C Approach Vol,veh/h 133 A 1131 925 A Approach Delay,s/veh 28.2 18.9 29.9 Approach LOS C B C Timer-Assigned Phs 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 57.5 22.5 9.5 48.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 53.0 18.0 5.0 43.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 38.4 7.0 3.0 37.7 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 7.0 0.2 0.0 3.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.1 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2026 With Project PM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 9 12 372 12 18 420 Future Vol,veh/h 9 12 372 12 18 420 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 13 404 13 20 457 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 908 411 0 0 417 0 Stage 1 411 - - - - - Stage 2 497 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 306 641 1142 Stage 1 669 - - Stage 2 611 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 299 641 1142 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 299 - - Stage 1 669 Stage 2 597 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 13.8 0 0.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 430 1142 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.053 0.017 HCM Control Delay(s) 13.8 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 With Project AM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 1 449 8 0 308 Future Vol,veh/h 12 1 449 8 0 308 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 23 23 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 82 82 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 2 548 10 0 371 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 947 576 0 0 581 0 Stage 1 576 - - - - - Stage 2 371 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 290 517 993 Stage 1 562 - - Stage 2 698 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 284 506 971 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 284 - - Stage 1 550 Stage 2 698 Approach WB NB Sm HCM Control Delay,s 18.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 294 971 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.068 - HCM Control Delay(s) 18.1 0 HCM Lane LOS C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2031 With Project AM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 18.3 Intersection LOS C Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 39 81 417 37 47 262 Future Vol,veh/h 39 81 417 37 47 262 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 51 107 515 46 62 345 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 10.5 22.7 15.3 HCM LOS B C C Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 15% Vol Thru, % 92% 0% 0% 85% Vol Right, % 8% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 454 39 81 309 LT Vol 0 39 0 47 Through Vol 417 0 0 262 RT Vol 37 0 81 0 Lane Flow Rate 560 51 107 407 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.773 0.105 0.182 0.586 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.966 7.357 6.132 5.193 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 734 487 584 695 Service Time 2.966 5.103 3.877 3.224 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.763 0.105 0.183 0.586 HCM Control Delay 22.7 11 10.2 15.3 HCM Lane LOS C B B C HCM 95th-tile Q 7.5 0.3 0.7 3.8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 With Project AM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 8.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL BL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 36 1 0 11 3 Future Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 36 1 0 11 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 4 0 2 2 0 4 3 0 1 1 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 42 42 42 50 50 50 38 38 38 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 6 0 0 10 2 0 72 2 0 29 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 16 0 0 8 0 0 45 28 9 63 27 18 Stage 1 - - - - - - 12 12 - 15 15 - Stage 2 - - 33 16 - 48 12 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1602 1612 957 865 1073 932 866 1061 Stage 1 - - 1009 886 - 1005 883 - Stage 2 - - 983 882 - 965 886 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1596 1609 921 859 1070 866 860 1054 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 921 859 - 866 860 - Stage 1 1006 883 1000 879 Stage 2 941 878 883 883 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.5 0 9.6 9.2 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 864 1596 1609 895 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.086 0.001 - 0.041 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.6 7.3 0 0 9.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 0 0.1 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2031 With Project AM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t t Movement EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 137 29 30 814 760 63 Future Volume(veh/h) 137 29 30 814 760 63 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 185 0 32 857 844 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.74 0.74 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 428 289 1197 960 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.00 0.07 0.64 0.51 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 185 0 32 857 844 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 6.6 0.0 0.5 22.8 30.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 6.6 0.0 0.5 22.8 30.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 428 289 1197 960 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.11 0.72 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 428 289 1197 960 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 24.2 0.0 13.1 9.0 16.2 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 3.2 0.0 0.8 3.7 11.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.1 0.0 0.2 7.5 13.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.3 0.0 13.9 12.7 27.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C Approach Vol,veh/h 185 A 889 844 A Approach Delay,s/veh 27.3 12.7 27.5 Approach LOS C B C Timer-Assigned Phs 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 52.5 22.5 9.5 43.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 48.0 18.0 5.0 38.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 24.8 8.6 2.5 32.0 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 6.1 0.3 0.0 2.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.6 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 With Project AM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 14 22 437 6 6 316 Future Vol,veh/h 14 22 437 6 6 316 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 24 475 7 7 343 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 836 479 0 0 482 0 Stage 1 479 - - - - - Stage 2 357 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 337 587 1081 Stage 1 623 - - Stage 2 708 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 334 587 1081 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 334 - - Stage 1 623 Stage 2 702 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 13.7 0 0.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 453 1081 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.086 0.006 HCM Control Delay(s) 13.7 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 With Project PM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 Movement WB BR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 9 8 394 19 5 463 Future Vol,veh/h 9 8 394 19 5 463 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 61 61 87 87 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 13 453 22 6 520 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 997 465 0 0 476 0 Stage 1 465 - - - - - Stage 2 532 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 271 597 1086 Stage 1 632 - - Stage 2 589 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 269 596 1085 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 269 - - Stage 1 631 Stage 2 584 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 15.7 0 0.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 363 1085 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.077 0.005 HCM Control Delay(s) 15.7 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2031 With Project PM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 20.4 Intersection LOS C Movement WBL WBQmmmm,VBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 55 83 365 41 81 405 Future Vol,veh/h 55 83 365 41 81 405 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 67 101 424 48 92 460 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 10.8 18.5 25 HCM LOS B C C Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 17% Vol Thru, % 90% 0% 0% 83% Vol Right, % 10% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 406 55 83 486 LT Vol 0 55 0 81 Through Vol 365 0 0 405 RT Vol 41 0 83 0 Lane Flow Rate 472 67 101 552 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.679 0.14 0.177 0.792 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.174 7.515 6.288 5.162 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 699 477 570 701 Service Time 3.207 5.265 4.038 3.193 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.675 0.14 0.177 0.787 HCM Control Delay 18.5 11.5 10.4 25 HCM Lane LOS C I B C HCM 95th-tile Q 5.3 0.5 0.6 7.9 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 With Project PM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 8.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL NBT NB R- SBF& Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 18 0 1 37 1 Future Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 18 0 1 37 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 67 67 67 25 25 25 25 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 19 3 0 10 1 0 72 0 4 148 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor Conflicting Flow All 13 0 0 22 0 0 121 46 21 82 47 14 Stage 1 - - - - - - 33 33 - 13 13 - Stage 2 - - 88 13 - 69 34 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1606 1593 854 846 1056 905 845 1066 Stage 1 - - 983 868 - 1007 885 - Stage 2 - - 920 885 - 941 867 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1603 1593 733 841 1056 842 840 1063 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 733 841 - 842 840 - Stage 1 979 865 1001 883 Stage 2 762 883 859 864 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.6 0 9.7 10.2 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 841 1603 1593 845 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.086 0.004 - 0.185 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.7 7.3 0 0 10.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 0 0.7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2031 With Project PM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 104 25 52 1026 913 129 Future Volume(veh/h) 104 25 52 1026 913 129 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 137 0 60 1179 1003 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 356 249 1309 1112 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.00 0.06 0.70 0.59 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 137 0 60 1179 1003 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 6.0 0.0 1.0 46.0 42.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 6.0 0.0 1.0 46.0 42.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 356 249 1309 1112 V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.24 0.90 0.90 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 356 249 1309 1112 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 31.2 0.0 17.2 11.0 16.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 3.1 0.0 2.3 10.1 11.8 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.9 0.0 0.7 16.2 17.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.3 0.0 19.4 21.1 27.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS C B C C Approach Vol,veh/h 137 A 1239 1003 A Approach Delay,s/veh 34.3 21.0 27.7 Approach LOS C C C Timer-Assigned Phs I 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 67.5 22.5 9.5 58.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 63.0 18.0 5.0 53.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 48.0 8.0 3.0 44.2 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 8.2 0.2 0.0 4.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.6 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2031 With Project PM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 11 15 401 15 22 452 Future Vol,veh/h 11 15 401 15 22 452 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 16 436 16 24 491 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 983 444 0 0 452 0 Stage 1 444 - - - - - Stage 2 539 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 276 614 1109 Stage 1 646 - - Stage 2 585 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 268 614 1109 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 268 - - Stage 1 646 Stage 2 567 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 14.8 0 0.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 397 1109 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.071 0.022 HCM Control Delay(s) 14.8 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Roundabout 2041 With Project AM Roundabout 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 7.4 Intersection LOS A Approach NB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow,veh/h 158 639 461 Demand Flow Rate,veh/h 161 652 470 Vehicles Circulating,veh/h 605 63 52 Vehicles Exiting,veh/h 110 459 714 Ped Vol Crossing Leg,#/h 24 3 0 Ped Cap Adj 0.997 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay,s/veh 7.4 8.2 6.2 Approach LOS A A A Lane IMF— Left Left Left Designated Moves LR TR LT Assumed Moves LR TR LT RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway,s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway,s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow,veh/h 161 652 470 Cap Entry Lane,veh/h 744 1294 1309 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.981 0.980 0.981 Flow Entry,veh/h 158 639 461 Cap Entry,veh/h 728 1268 1284 V/C Ratio 0.217 0.504 0.359 Control Delay,s/veh 7.4 8.2 6.2 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue,veh 1 3 2 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2041 With Project AM Signalized 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t i Movement NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations *' Traffic Volume(veh/h) 39 81 480 37 47 303 Future Volume(veh/h) 39 81 480 37 47 303 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 51 107 593 46 62 399 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.76 0.76 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 583 519 868 67 127 685 Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1706 132 103 1345 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 51 107 0 639 461 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 0 1838 1449 0 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 2.7 0.0 14.4 1.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 2.7 0.0 14.4 16.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 583 519 0 936 812 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.21 0.00 0.68 0.57 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 583 519 0 936 812 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 12.8 13.3 0.0 10.2 9.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.3 0.9 0.0 4.0 2.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.4 1.0 0.0 5.6 3.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.1 14.2 0.0 14.2 11.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A B B A Approach Vol,veh/h 158 639 461 Approach Delay,s/veh 13.9 14.2 11.9 Approach LOS B B B Timer-Assigned Phs 2 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 32.5 32.5 22.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 28.0 28.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 16.4 18.1 4.7 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 3.4 2.2 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.3 HCM 6th LOS B Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 With Project AM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 1 517 8 0 356 Future Vol,veh/h 12 1 517 8 0 356 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 23 23 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 65 65 82 82 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 2 630 10 0 429 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1087 658 0 0 663 0 Stage 1 658 - - - - - Stage 2 429 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 239 464 926 Stage 1 515 - - Stage 2 657 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 234 454 906 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 234 - - Stage 1 504 Stage 2 657 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 21.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 243 906 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.082 - HCM Control Delay(s) 21.1 0 HCM Lane LOS C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2041 With Project AM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 26.6 Intersection LOS D Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 39 81 480 37 47 303 Future Vol,veh/h 39 81 480 37 47 303 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 51 107 593 46 62 399 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 10.9 35.8 19.1 HCM LOS B E C Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 13% Vol Thru, % 93% 0% 0% 87% Vol Right, % 7% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 517 39 81 350 LT Vol 0 39 0 47 Through Vol 480 0 0 303 RT Vol 37 0 81 0 Lane Flow Rate 638 51 107 461 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.897 0.109 0.191 0.682 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.057 7.673 6.444 5.329 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 715 466 555 677 Service Time 3.089 5.428 4.198 3.366 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.892 0.109 0.193 0.681 HCM Control Delay 35.8 11.4 10.7 19.1 HCM Lane LOS E B B C HCM 95th-tile Q 11.5 0.4 0.7 5.4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 With Project AM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 8.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL BL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 36 1 0 11 3 Future Vol,veh/h 1 4 0 0 4 1 0 36 1 0 11 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 4 0 2 2 0 4 3 0 1 1 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 42 42 42 50 50 50 38 38 38 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 6 0 0 10 2 0 72 2 0 29 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 16 0 0 8 0 0 45 28 9 63 27 18 Stage 1 - - - - - - 12 12 - 15 15 - Stage 2 - - 33 16 - 48 12 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1602 1612 957 865 1073 932 866 1061 Stage 1 - - 1009 886 - 1005 883 - Stage 2 - - 983 882 - 965 886 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1596 1609 921 859 1070 866 860 1054 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 921 859 - 866 860 - Stage 1 1006 883 1000 879 Stage 2 941 878 883 883 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.5 0 9.6 9.2 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 864 1596 1609 895 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.086 0.001 - 0.041 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.6 7.3 0 0 9.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 0 0.1 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2041 With Project AM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t t Movement EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 137 29 30 941 875 63 Future Volume(veh/h) 137 29 30 941 875 63 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 185 0 32 991 972 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.74 0.74 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 356 269 1309 1112 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.00 0.06 0.70 0.59 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 185 0 32 991 972 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 8.3 0.0 0.5 30.4 39.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 8.3 0.0 0.5 30.4 39.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 356 269 1309 1112 V/C Ratio(X) 0.52 0.12 0.76 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 356 269 1309 1112 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 32.1 0.0 15.0 8.6 15.4 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 5.3 0.0 0.9 4.1 9.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 4.1 0.0 0.3 9.8 16.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.5 0.0 15.9 12.7 25.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B B C Approach Vol,veh/h 185 A 1023 972 A Approach Delay,s/veh 37.5 12.8 25.0 Approach LOS D B C Timer-Assigned Phs 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 67.5 22.5 9.5 58.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 63.0 18.0 5.0 53.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 32.4 10.3 2.5 41.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 8.6 0.3 0.0 5.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.4 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 With Project AM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 14 22 506 6 6 366 Future Vol,veh/h 14 22 506 6 6 366 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 24 550 7 7 398 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 966 554 0 0 557 0 Stage 1 554 - - - - - Stage 2 412 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 282 532 1014 Stage 1 575 - - Stage 2 669 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 279 532 1014 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 279 - - Stage 1 575 Stage 2 663 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 15.2 0 0.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 393 1014 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.1 0.006 HCM Control Delay(s) 15.2 8.6 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Roundabout 2041 With Project PM Roundabout 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 7.6 Intersection LOS A Approach Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow,veh/h 168 536 622 Demand Flow Rate,veh/h 171 547 635 Vehicles Circulating,veh/h 498 94 68 Vehicles Exiting,veh/h 143 609 601 Ped Vol Crossing Leg,#/h 6 1 0 Ped Cap Adj 0.999 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay,s/veh 6.6 7.4 8.1 Approach LOS A A A Lane IMF— Left —00-- Left Designated Moves LR TR LT Assumed Moves LR TR LT RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway,s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway,s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow,veh/h 171 547 635 Cap Entry Lane,veh/h 830 1254 1287 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.982 0.980 0.980 Flow Entry,veh/h 168 536 622 Cap Entry,veh/h 815 1229 1262 V/C Ratio 0.206 0.436 0.493 Control Delay,s/veh 6.6 7.4 8.1 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue,veh 1 2 3 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2041 With Project PM Signalized 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t i Movement WB L- NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 1� 4 Traffic Volume(veh/h) 55 83 420 41 81 466 Future Volume(veh/h) 55 83 420 41 81 466 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 67 101 488 48 92 530 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 534 476 919 90 155 767 Arrive On Green 0.30 0.30 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1671 164 157 1395 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 67 101 0 536 622 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 0 1835 1552 0 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.6 2.9 0.0 11.1 7.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.6 2.9 0.0 11.1 18.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.09 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 534 476 0 1009 922 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.21 0.00 0.53 0.67 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 534 476 0 1009 922 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 15.3 15.7 0.0 8.6 9.9 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.5 1.0 0.0 2.0 3.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 1.1 0.0 4.0 5.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.8 16.7 0.0 10.6 13.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A B B A Approach Vol,veh/h 168 536 622 Approach Delay,s/veh 16.3 10.6 13.9 Approach LOS B B B Timer-Assigned Phs 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 37.5 37.5 22.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 33.0 33.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 13.1 20.8 4.9 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 3.5 3.6 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.8 HCM 6th LOS B Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 With Project PM 10: Alii Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 Movement WB BR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 9 8 454 19 5 533 Future Vol,veh/h 9 8 454 19 5 533 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 61 61 87 87 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 13 522 22 6 599 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1145 534 0 0 545 0 Stage 1 534 - - - - - Stage 2 611 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 221 546 1024 Stage 1 588 - - Stage 2 542 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 219 545 1023 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 219 - - Stage 1 587 Stage 2 537 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 18 0 0.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 305 1023 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.091 0.005 HCM Control Delay(s) 18 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th AWSC 2041 With Project PM 20: Alii Dr & La'aloa Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 30.2 Intersection LOS D Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Traffic Vol,veh/h 55 83 420 41 81 466 Future Vol,veh/h 55 83 420 41 81 466 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 67 101 488 48 92 530 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 0 0 1 Approach S Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 2 Conflicting Approach Right SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 0 HCM Control Delay 11.3 25.5 39.3 HCM LOS B D E Lane NBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 15% Vol Thru, % 91% 0% 0% 85% Vol Right, % 9% 0% 100% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 461 55 83 547 LT Vol 0 55 0 81 Through Vol 420 0 0 466 RT Vol 41 0 83 0 Lane Flow Rate 536 67 101 622 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 2 Degree of Util(X) 0.791 0.146 0.186 0.912 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.314 7.834 6.603 5.284 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 681 457 542 684 Service Time 3.359 5.597 4.365 3.326 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.787 0.147 0.186 0.909 HCM Control Delay 25.5 11.9 10.9 39.3 HCM Lane LOS D B B E HCM 95th-tile Q 7.8 0.5 0.7 11.9 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 With Project PM 30: Naniloa Dr & Queen Kalama Ave 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 8.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL NBT NB R- SBF& Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 18 0 1 37 1 Future Vol,veh/h 5 15 2 0 7 1 0 18 0 1 37 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 67 67 67 25 25 25 25 25 25 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 19 3 0 10 1 0 72 0 4 148 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor Conflicting Flow All 13 0 0 22 0 0 121 46 21 82 47 14 Stage 1 - - - - - - 33 33 - 13 13 - Stage 2 - - 88 13 - 69 34 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1606 1593 854 846 1056 905 845 1066 Stage 1 - - 983 868 - 1007 885 - Stage 2 - - 920 885 - 941 867 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1603 1593 733 841 1056 842 840 1063 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 733 841 - 842 840 - Stage 1 979 865 1001 883 Stage 2 762 883 859 864 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.6 0 9.7 10.2 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 841 1603 1593 845 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.086 0.004 - 0.185 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.7 7.3 0 0 10.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 0 0.7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2041 With Project PM 40: Route 11 & Laaloa Ave II 09/03/2021 t t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 104 25 52 1180 1055 129 Future Volume(veh/h) 104 25 52 1180 1055 129 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 137 0 60 1356 1159 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 321 181 1365 1188 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.00 0.05 0.73 0.63 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 137 0 60 1356 1159 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1585 1781 1870 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s),s 6.8 0.0 1.0 71.2 59.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 6.8 0.0 1.0 71.2 59.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 321 181 1365 1188 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.33 0.99 0.98 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 321 181 1365 1188 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 36.4 0.0 25.3 13.3 17.5 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 4.1 0.0 4.9 22.8 20.9 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.4 0.0 1.1 28.0 26.9 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.5 0.0 30.2 36.0 38.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D D Approach Vol,veh/h 137 A 1416 1159 A Approach Delay,s/veh 40.5 35.8 38.4 Approach LOS D D D Timer-Assigned Phs 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),s 77.5 22.5 9.5 68.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 73.0 18.0 5.0 63.5 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 73.2 8.8 3.0 61.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 37.2 HCM 6th LOS D Notes Unsignalized Delay for[EBR, SBR]is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 2041 With Project PM 50: Alii Dr & 201 H Driveway 09/03/2021 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 11 15 464 15 22 523 Future Vol,veh/h 11 15 464 15 22 523 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 16 504 16 24 568 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1128 512 0 0 520 0 Stage 1 512 - - - - - Stage 2 616 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 226 562 1046 Stage 1 602 - - Stage 2 539 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 218 562 1046 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 218 - - Stage 1 602 Stage 2 521 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 16.7 0 0.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 337 1046 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.084 0.023 HCM Control Delay(s) 16.7 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 - Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 "M-47t 1&4 JS-/31/17 OP DAVID Y.ICE M":Pw�p n1:1111W.%T1 11 � �w: SUZANNE D.CASE and CIWR -N R14�k r4 110ARD(11:LAND AND NAWRAL REMIURCM (IMMNSFON ON WATFA W-SOLIRCT,MANAGEMM' KEKOA KALUHIWA FMIA)MITY 0." JE tI`FVT.PFARSGT M. DIA!Irry"DIFAIMR-WATFR AQ11AW RES01IRM BoAnm Atm(,*!F; mcwATION Sate OS Ha'Na" STATE OF HAWAII WIREA1 r DM�W'%NVRNANCP% 1_J)M&JJ5SJ()N ON WATER HILVIURCT,MS DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONSliRVATION AND MASTAL LANDS IV INSF7iYATlf M AND RF-IRAIRfFS ENR)RCatEWr ENGINEERING STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION ;J,RE5=Y AND WILDLWIS ILS IRICE-MRVATION KAKUHIHEWA BUILDING KMI(X;I.AVAMLqLANI)RRF.'-Sl-:RVECCiNiklISSION 601 KAMOKILA BLVD.STE 555STATE LAND PARKS KAPOLE1,HAWAII 96707 May 8, 2017 Mr. Alan Haun Haun & Associates LOG NO: 2017.00649 73-1168 Kahuna Ao Road DOC NO. 1704.KH02 Kailua-Kona HI 96740 Dear Mr. Hammatt: Subject: Draft Burial Treatment Plan for SIHP #50-10-37-2842 & 24534 at Kapala'alaea 2 Ahupua'a, North Kona District,Island of Hawaii,TMK: (3) 7-7-008:121. At its monthly meeting on March 16, 2017, the Hawaii Island Burial Council (HIBC) made the determination that the human skeletal remains at the above location shall be preserved in place. In addition, at its monthly meeting on April 20, 2017,the HIBC recommended that the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) accept the plan. You may proceed with implementing the provision of the plan. Please change the title of this plan to: Burial Site Component of an Archeological Preservation Plan for SIHP#50-10-37-2842 &24534 at Kapala'alaea 2 Ahupua'a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii,TMK: (3) 7-7-008:121. Please submit two hard copies of this plan marked Final together with a copy of this letter. One hard copy (and CD copy) to be sent to SHPD's Kapolei office and the other hard copy is to be sent to SHPD's Hilo Office. Should you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to contact Burial Sites Specialist, Kauanoe Hoomanawanui at(808) 896-0475 or email atMILli Ca him Lli i,go�.. Sincerely, /bz W2 .0—. a./rte -- Mr. Hinano Rodrigues History &Culture Branch Chief Cc: Archeology Branch, Susan Lebo Planning Dept. Exhibit 2 1316-042117 FINAL BURIAL SITE COMPONENT OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION PLAN SITE 50-10-37-24842 AND PORTIONS OF SITE 24534 TMK (3) 7-7-008:121 KAPALXALAEA 2 AHUPUNA NORTH KONA DISTRICT ISLAND OF HAWAII I--IAUN & ASSOCIATES FOLOGICAL, CULTURAL,AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 73-1168 KAHUNA A`O ROAD, KAILUA-KONA HI 96740 PHONE: 808-325-2402 FAx: 808-325-1520 1316-062517 FINAL BURIAL SITE COMPONENT OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION PLAN SITE 50-10-37-24842 AND PORTIONS OF SITE 24534 TMK (3) 7-7-008:121 KAPALNALAEA 2 AHUPUNA NORTH KONA DISTRICT ISLAND OF HAWAII Prepared by: Alan E. Haun, Ph.D. and Dave Henry, B.S. Prepared for: Aldersgate Investment, LLC Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC 300 E. Espanade Dr. Suite 1550 Oxnard CA 93036-1281 April 2017 HAUN & ASSOCIATES ARCHAEOLOGICAL, CULTURAL,AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 7 3-1168 KAHUNA A`O ROAD, KAILUA-KONA HI 96740 PHONE: 808-325-2402 FAx: 808-325-1520 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report No . 1316 - 062517 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This Burial Site Component on an Archaeological Preservation Plan (BSCAPP) provides for the conservation of one site (Site 50-10-37-24842) and a portion of a second site (Site 24534) in a 11.415 acre parcel in Kapala'alaea 2 Ahupua'a, North Kona District, Hawai'i Island (TMK: [3] 7-7-008:121). Human remains were identified at Site 24842 during an Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) of the subject parcel by Haun and Henry (2006), and human remains were identified at Site 24534 during an AIS of the adjacent parcel by Archaeological Consultants of the Pacific, Inc. (ACP; Gregg et al. 2006).The latter study includes burial features that spanned the boundary between both properties.A Burial Treatment Plan was subsequently prepared for Site 24534 by ACP(Kouneski and Kennedy 2007) and accepted by the Department of Land and Natural Resources/State Historic Preservation Division (DLNR- SHPD). The property consists of undeveloped land on the seaward side of the proposed Kahului to Keauhou Parkway at elevations ranging from approximately 50 ft to 122 ft. Project Proponent: Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC Project Description: Preservation protocol for two significant sites prior to the development of a 62 unit residential subdivision Project Location:TMK: (3)7-7-008:121 in Kapala'alaea 2 Ahupua'a, North Kona District, Island of Hawai'i Project Acreage: 11.415 acres Land Jurisdiction: owned in fee simple by Aldersgate Investment, LLC Plan Proposal: Identification of burial preservation sites within the 11.415 acre project area, identification of appropriate forms of preservation, provisions for a consultation process, and identification of short-term and long- term preservation measures including a provision for permanent buffer zones, No build setbacks, and temporary buffer zones. Preservation Sites: Site 24534—Burial/ceremonial/permanent habitation/agricultural complex Site 24842—Burial/permanent habitation complex HAUN &ASSOCIATES 111 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 Contents MANAGEMENT SUMMARY....................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 1 ProjectIdentification ................................................................................................................... 1 Plan Purpose and Identification .................................................................................................. 1 ProjectBackground .................................................................................................................... 1 Documentary Research..............................................................................................................7 ProposedDevelopment..............................................................................................................9 IDENTIFICATION OF BURIAL SITES........................................................................................9 Site24534..................................................................................................................................9 Site24842................................................................................................................................ 16 SEARCH FOR LINEAL AND CULTURAL DESCENDANTS..................................................... 18 Publication of Burial Notices..................................................................................................... 18 Consultation ............................................................................................................................. 18 PROPOSED TREATEMENT OF BURIAL SITES ..................................................................... 19 Forms of Preservation .............................................................................................................. 19 Avoidance and Protection (Conservation)................................................................................. 19 Conservation Measures............................................................................................................ 19 Immediate Conservation....................................................................................................21 Short-Term Conservation ..................................................................................................21 Long-Term Conservation...................................................................................................21 Signage.............................................................................................................................22 Landscaping and Maintenance.................................................................................................22 Access for Lineal and/or Cultural Descendants ........................................................................22 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BURIAL TREATMENT PLAN .....................................................22 INADVERTENT DISCOVERIES...............................................................................................22 TRANSLATION OF HAWAIIAN WORDS..................................................................................24 REFERENCES.........................................................................................................................24 APPENDIX A — NOVEMBER 21, 2006 SHPD AIS ACCEPTANCE LETTER............................26 APPENDIX B — MAY 22, 2006 SHPD AIS ACCEPTANCE LETTER.........................................27 APPENDIX C — HIBC COUNCIL DETERMINATION ................................................................28 APPENDIX D —AFFIDAVITS OF BURIAL NOTICE PUBLICATION.........................................30 HAUN & ASSOCIATES 1111 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 Figures Figure 1. Portion of 1996 USGS 7.5'Kealakekua Quadrangle showing project area....................................................2 Figure 2.Tax Map Key 7-7-008 showing Haun and Henry(2006)and Gregg et al. (2006)project areas..................... 3 Figure 3. Haun and Henry(2006)site location map.....................................................................................................4 Figure 4. Gregg et al. (2006:24)site location map........................................................................................................ 6 Figure 5. Ahupua'a boundaries and Land Commission Awards....................................................................................8 Figure 6. Portion of Emerson's 1880s map of Kailua showing Haun and Henry(2006)project area......................... 10 Figure 7. Portion of 1928 USGS Kailua Quadrangle showing Haun and Henry project area ...................................... 11 Figure 8. Proposed subdivision layout........................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 9. Site 24534, Feature B plan map................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 10. Site 24534, plan map of Features C, F, G and H and profile of TU-18........................................................ 15 Figure 11. Site 24842 plan map and profile of TU-12................................................................................................. 17 Figure 12. Proposed preservation buffers.................................................................................................................. 20 HAUN & ASSOCIATES I lV T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report No . 1316 - 062517 INTRODUCTION Project Identification Haun & Associates prepared this Burial Site Component on an Archaeological Preservation Plan (BSCAPP) at the request of Aldersgate Investment, LLC.The project area is an 11.415 acre parcel in Kapala'alaea 2 Ahupua'a, North Kona District, Island of Hawai'i (TMK: [3] 7-7-008:121; Figure 1 and Figure 2). The project area ranges from approximately 50 ft to 122 ft elevation, and is bordered by the proposed Kahului to Keauhou Parkway to the east, by undeveloped land to the west, and by stone walls to the north and south. The terrain within the parcel slopes gently to the southwest. Plan Purpose and Identification The purpose of this plan is to facilitate the proper treatment of human burial remains identified at two sites in the subject parcel to achieve compliance with the Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-SHPD) Hawai'i Revised Statutes §6E-Historic Preservation subsections 42-43, as amended, and their implementing rules in Hawai'i Administrative Rules (HAR) §13-13-284 Rules Governing Procedures for Historic Preservation Review to Comment on Section 6E-42, HRS (DLNR 2003) and to provide the Hawai'i Island Burial Council (HIBC) with the relevant information called for in HAR 13-13-300-33- Request for Council Determination to Preserve or Relocate Native Hawaiian Burial Sites(DLNR 1996). This BSCAPP provides details on the project background, identifies the burial sites,summarizes the search for lineal and cultural descendants, proposes treatment of the burial sites, and discusses protocols for the implementation of the plan. The proposed forms of preservation are avoidance and protection (conservation) and appropriate cultural use. Project Background The subject parcel was subjected to an Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) in 2005 by Haun & Associates (Haun and Henry 2006).The AIS identified 14 sites with 172 features (Figure 3).The sites consist of four previously identified sites and ten that were newly identified during the inventory survey.The sites consist of a livestock control wall (Site 50-10- 37-63681), a complex of two livestock control walls (Site 6368), two agricultural complexes that contain three features (Site 6369) and 142 features (Site 24846), a complex with five permanent habitation/ceremonial features (Site 24534), a temporary habitation lava blister (Site 24838), two temporary habitation platforms (Site 24839 and 24841), two permanent habitation platforms(Sites 24840 and 24843), a permanent habitation/burial complex with two features(Site 24842), a permanent habitation pavement (Sites 24845), and two permanent habitation complexes that contain two features(Site 24844)and nine features(Site 24846). Haun and Henry(2006:64)assessed all 14 sites in the subject parcel as significant for their information content (Criterion "d" under HAR §13-284-6 [b]).The Site 24534 permanent habitation/ceremonial complex and the Site 24842 permanent habitation/burial complex were additionally assessed as significant for their cultural value (Criterion "e"'). Haun and Henry(ibid.) recommended no further work or preservation for three sites (Sites 6366, 6368, and 6369)where mapping, written descriptions, and photographic documentation adequately documented them. Sites 24534 and 24842 were recommended for preservation. The nine remaining sites (Sites 24838-24841, and 24843-24847) retained the potential to yield information important for understanding prehistoric and early historic land use and were recommended for data 1 All sites listed on the State Inventory of Historic Places(SIHP).Site numbers are 5 digit sequential numbers by island :50= State of Hawai'i,10=Island of Hawai'i, 37=Kealakekua quadrangle HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 • 4 /` w� tom— �S � 4 - T f J � ' Q � � _ r-� _ _'� t to to cr in n N N n � E p cn cn Y _x t O I a O M W a f � Sea a O � a a a a ri Y 3 00 I1 HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 2 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 .Jt J,�n srnp etouw nrx„r 'fib•„H�o ce !ry cr a yy ' Hi6/IN4Y `{� 9 d l i dt , �irN e. ,IAKINI `.'� Q • - xW�"'..r+'.• 7 ytWA s Hq a� AIK - SK 1 a a < x o < tA a s o _ +• nw g x O o y4 N /* e O 0 A Iflf I kl v �• r a tv frl v io V �A� Wor di a ry l0 V. � ra� [ /./ �V' Asa,-.:•; -_ 4 O 1 u T < IhW, !!1 i \•Y. I 33r SSW a rta < if J 4 ti 4 a s d, 3SWI%; u j + 4 r 14, � , IBJ/ z' c S o 3 V Bat fB.B "Gr noH zr cd a 1 oe. d _ co 3 • � c” tA s O CL • ��$ ii L` �. ®motes u'o Pi ��"F.-.+�ki�a��'.s t ..� ,� •. � - ,B a f•;_. 3 VIM , LL HAUN &ASSOCIATES 3 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report No . 1316 - 062517 c x ---- ---- ---- - d -d`--- cl� d ----------- CV ----------a d P°�4 d v' N OQ 0% mbom d o o m° m 0 e da o ox o � m a U ° � o w 0 ��joQ�o° o Q Bpo-Q F U ° z N O °° 3 a Q v° ry o w � ° � M a+ W° W �N N Dc O � W � W Ak o w o 16 0 0 __ l 3 m M a M 00 LL HAUN &ASSOCIATES 4 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 recovery. SHPD concurred with the significance assessments and recommended treatments in a November 21, 2006 letter to Dr. Alan Haun from SHPD Administrator Melanie Chinen (Log No. 2006.3733, Doc. No. 0611MK24; Appendix A). A parcel adjacent to the west side of the present project area was subjected to an AIS by Archaeological Consultants of the Pacific, Inc. (ACP; Gregg et al. 2006). This study identified 11 sites and 54 features (Figure 4). The sites consist of a portion of the Great Wall of Kuakini (Site 6302), three ranch walls (Sites 6366, 24038 and 24039), a complex of three ranch walls (Site 24529), a platform over a burial cave (Site 24530), a burial complex with ten features (Site 24531),a burial/agricultural complex with five features (Site 24532),an agricultural complex with 13 features (Site 24533), a burial/habitation/agricultural complex with 14 features (Site 24534), and agricultural/ranching complex with four features (Site 24535). The Gregg et al. (2006) AIS assigned a new site number (Site 24039) to a wall along the southern project boundary that had been previously assigned a different site number(Site 6368)during the AIS of the proposed Kahului to Keauhou Parkway (Haun et al. 1998). One of the sites (Site 24534) is located along the inland boundary of the Gregg et al. (2006) survey area.This site, discussed in more detail in the following Identification of Burial Sites section of this report, contains eight platforms (Features B-H, and J), three mounds, (Features K, L, and M), two modified outcrops (Features A and N), and a low wall (Feature 1). Subsurface testing at five of these features (Features C-F and J) revealed human remains. Two additional platforms were interpreted as possible burials (Features G and H). It was subsequently determined that small portions of five features(Features B,C, F,G,and H)extend into the current project area. Gregg et al. (2006:63-64)assessed all 11 sites as significant for their information content (Criterion "d"). Sites 6366 and 24039 were additionally assessed as significant as a good site type example (Criterion "c"), and Sites 24530, 24531, 24532,and 24534 were additionally assessed as significant for their cultural value (Criterion "e") due to the presence of human remains.The Site 6302 Kuakini Wall was assessed as significant for its association with an event that made an important contribution to history (Criterion "a"), its association with the life of an important person (Criterion "b") as well as being significant under Criterion "c" and "d". Four of the 11 sites were recommended for no further work (Sites 24038, 24529, 24533, and 24353) and seven were recommended for preservation (Sites 6302, 6366, 24039, 24530, 24531, 24532, and 24534). The latter four preservation sites were also recommended for archaeological monitoring. SHPD concurred with the significance assessments and recommended treatments in a May 22, 2006 letter to Joseph Kennedy from SHPD Administrator Melanie Chinen (Log No. 2006.1598, Doc. No. 0605JT31;Appendix B). A Burial Treatment Plan (BTP) was subsequently prepared by ACP (Kouneski and Kennedy 2007) to guide the preservation of the burials at Sites 24530, 24531, 24532, and 24534.This plan proposed the establishment of a 40 ft temporary buffer zone to protect the sites during construction in the parcel and a 20 ft permanent buffer and a "no build setback"of unspecified width. The Kouneski and Kennedy (2007) BTP was presented to the Hawai'i Island Burial Council (HIBC) on April 19, 2007. HIBC offered four recommendations to be addressed prior to final approval of the BTP in a May 29, 2007 letter (Log No.2007.1644, Doc. No. 0704KL09;Appendix Q.The recommendations are as follows: 1. That the exposed portion of SIHP Site 24530 be sealed to protect the burial(s)within the site. 2. That a 10 ft no build setback be established from the 20 foot permanent buffer and the temporary buffer be increased from 40 to 70 feet. 3. That an archaeological monitor be present during grubbing and grading on the property. 4. That the HIBC be allowed to review subdivision, development, and grading plans once they are finalized and submitted to the County of Hawai'i for review and that the County of Hawai'i be notified of this request. HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 5 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report No . 1316 - 062517 �3 o� a N III � - -------- 1 / .-- 1 op 1 y , I V1 i 4 ra ti c W 1 i f f 1 I • 1 f 1 I f O i n V 1 N f j `•�� 1 � � a 1 � • 1 Q ` 4 t 1 +' Q 1 G U ,D ctrl 3 0 ND v' � a M � ----------------------: 4 0 7. 1 YYY of I !� •`� _ � �I M m I�G7.JI 00 LL HAUN &ASSOCIATES 6 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report No . 1316 - 062517 Documentary Research The project area is located within the ahupua'a of Kapala'alaea 2, in the district of North Kona (Figure 5). Kapala'alaea is literally translated as to paint or stain red (Pukui and Elbert 1986). Early events documented in the Kona regional traditional history are associated with 'Umi-a-Liloa. Hawai'i was first unified under the rule of'Umi- a-Liloa and Kona was selected as a dwelling place of chiefs (Kamakau 1961). The area lies within the realm of the traditional Hawaiian political authority that was centered in the Kailua-Keauhou area from at least the 15th century to the reign of Kamehameha I. Kamakau (1961) indicates that Kapala'alaea was one of Kamehameha's deities: Kamehameha established yearly feasts as a time of rest from labor when men might regain their strength. At the close of the ninth month of each year a tabu was placed on eating the flesh of animals or of coconuts, and at the close of the year a pig was placed on the altar(lele), coconuts were opened, and a feast was held lasting seven days during which time food was prepared for the occasion. It was at this time that the game god was carried around. This god was the god of...all sorts of athletic exercises. Food was supplied by the government out of that collected by the landlords of every district during the working days set aside for the ruling chief, and were given over at once to the people for the festivities. As the god, Kapala-'alaea, and the goddess, Kiha-wahine, were borne along, the side toward the sea was tabu and the side toward the mountain was free. Anyone who broke the tabu by going on the tabu side paid a fine, but if he saw the deity and prostrated himself he save himself from the penalty. (1961:180). Schilt(1984)summarized Kailua's early historic period. In the late 1700s to early 1800s, Kamehameha monopolized foreign commerce including the provisioning of trading and whaling ships and beginning in 1811 the sandalwood trade. The first missionaries arrived in Kailua in 1820, but only stayed a few months. They returned in 1823 and were given land to establish missions and by 1825 schools.The gradual shift from subsistence farming to a market economy began with the introduction of coffee,corn, pumpkins,cotton, pineapple, and Irish potatoes in the 1820s to 1840s. Introduced early historic crops cultivated in the vicinity of Kailua below 500 ft elevation included melons, cabbage, onions, oranges, and tobacco. The introduction of cattle ranching and commercial coffee production in the mid-1800s caused further change to the traditional agricultural system. The Kuakini Wall, which was built to control the movement of livestock, is situated a short distance seaward of the project area.The wall's construction began in the early 1800s. Its completion in the mid-1850s is attributed to Governor Kuakini. In the 1840s, political acts of the Hawaiian Kingdom government would change the land tenure system in Hawai'i. All lands were segregated into one of three categories: "Crown Lands" owned by the occupant of the throne, "Government Lands" controlled by the state, and "Konohiki Lands" controlled by the chiefs; and "were all subject to the rights of native tenants" (Chinen 1958:29, Beamer 2014:143). In 1846, King Kamehameha III appointed a Board of Commissioners commonly known as the Land Commissioners, to "confirm or reject all claims to land arising previously to the 10th day of December, AD 1845." Notices were frequently posted in The Polynesian (Moffat and Kirkpatrick, 1995); however, the legislature did not acknowledge this act until June 7, 1848 (Chinen 1958:16; Moffat and Kirkpatrick 1995:48-49) and the act is known today as The Great Mahele. In 1850, the Kingdom government passed laws allowing foreigners to purchase fee simple lands (Speakman 2001:91). The Kuleana Act of 1850 allowed for fee simple land ownership by commoners. During the Great Mahele, Kapala'alaea 1 was given to Queen Kalama (LCA 4452H). The locations of all awarded parcels are shown in Figure 5.The Waihona 'Aina (2000) Mahele Database;which is a compilation of data from the Indices of Awards (Indices 1929), Native Register (NR n.d.), Native Testimony (NT n.d.), Foreign Register (FR n.d.) and Foreign Testimony(FT n.d.); lists twelve LCA claims for forty-six parcels within Kapala'alaea.Thirteen parcels HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 7 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report No . 1316 - 062517 _ I 0 0 N X } I l � } AU•i Dive I ------- 0 } i,36j2-i I c � I I f I wl I cry I I M� I PSG \�f� I I N I a I I I t Q I a I I I I I I N I 1 I O ISI al I a } C4 -- 1 o / o ! a I � � 1 f } F a 5 0 `n LL HAUN &ASSOCIATES 8 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 were awarded to nine claimants. The awarded kuleana parcels range from 0.15 to 3.64 acres in area with an average of 2.07 acres. All, except two awards, consist of two parcels. The remaining awards consisted of a single awarded parcel. The testimonies refer to at least six ili land divisions: Ililoa (1-3), Kupepeiao, Kamuku, and Moemoku.The awarded parcels are concentrated in two areas. One cluster of six awarded parcels is situated at the coast.The other cluster of four parcels is situated between 850 ft and 1,250 ft elevation. House lots are described in the testimonies for coastal parcels. House lots and cultivation are described for the inland parcels. The majority of claimed land parcels were conveyed to the claimants during the time of Kamehameha I by the claimant's parents. Six claims included house lots with at least 9 houses. Enclosing walls are described for three house lots. The testimonies refer to 52 kihapai, thirteen cultivated sections, and 11 sections. Only one claim testimony mentions specific crops. LCA 6082 mentions one mala of sweet potatoes,gourds,and corn. Emerson's 1880s map of Kailua (Figure 6) shows Kapala'alaea 2 as consisting of at least three grants. The seaward portion is Grant 3019 to Kaaipulu. The inland portion is comprised of two grants: Grant 1756 to Keoki, and Grant 1747 to Kekaukali.The seaward boundary of the inland forest is at approximately 800 ft elevation in Kapala'alaea. Commercial sugar cane cultivation in the Kailua area was attempted in the late 1800s and early 1900s, but was abandoned by the mid-1920s (Kelly 1983). Cattle ranching and coffee cultivation continued during the late 1800s and 1900s. A 1928 USGS quadrangle map (Figure 7) shows a trail or road extending from the coast along the northern side of Kapala'alaea to Kuakini Highway. Two houses are shown on the inland side of the highway and a railroad line. Construction of the railroad began in 1901 by the West Hawai'i Railway Company (Conde and Best 1973).The railroad was constructed to transport sugar cane to the Kailua Sugar Company Mill situated in Waiaha. At least two other houses are shown on the seaward side of the inland road in Kapala'alaea. By the 1970s, the rapidly developing tourism industry began to transform the region's land use from ranching and commercial agriculture,except coffee production,to subdivisions, resorts,and commercial establishments. Proposed Development A 62 unit residential subdivision is planned for the project area.The layout of the proposed subdivision is depicted in Figure 8. IDENTIFICATION OF BURIAL SITES Site 24534 Site 24534 is a complex of 13 features that was previously identified by Gregg et al. (2006) during a survey of Parcel 001 to the west of Parcel 121 (see Figure 2 and Figure 4). The Gregg et al. (2006) report was not available for review during the Haun and Henry (2006) survey, and only a site location map and brief summary table were provided by ACP. The complex contains eight platforms (Features B-H, and J), three mounds, (Features K, L, and M), two modified outcrops (Features A and N), and a low wall (Feature 1). Subsurface testing at five of these features (Features C-F and J) revealed human remains. Two additional platforms were interpreted as possible burials (Features G and H). The remaining features of the site were assigned habitation (Feature B), agriculture (Features A, K, L, M and N), and indeterminate functions (Feature 1). Examination of the site during the AIS project indicates that small portions of five features (Features B, C, F, G, and H) are located partially within or immediately adjacent to the subject project area.These features are described below. HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 9 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report No . 1316 - 062517 $r 4 Lff ( gy24 a !r r���s,� �/�/��P/�Iz�of � ._/1`��. �• r3raa�' L- -�tld � 4r....e /."r _ v �/ � V � ) Y_�/•- �,._�S �,.�,IJaJ�X ''ra'��-�r�. i ,Lq ay :t 3igA lrwS' ato;• �7� �. � _ � ��. �1r.6=� Gri 9P5 `J'..�•-�,.�.�"R �-�- . ilea_ _ "�;o;•�' 'F ! � _ �r !37 _ She�/...�.. -� Na'pu-v✓a�� Au eae�f . �"r� PUA,eS t -' � �_.�, aha _ ga3 •. ._.. pQup{n Emras E%O v.Sc !'wa'cai Ft. -- �Rutr l aToa C>Era� I7� �� c3ra, �r p j,,fr55f� � �, ,.�.�-• - uIr/i � -� �:iao,l;Ma::ect,T1..��F�.•`jr pm. � r� 1CAP4'e ir'1>'h ` . Gra_.—r•. .387 era I ' horn Kondlur PP Krhulor `� l�,f-• er,ggai X.vac ". L G� �' IGH Gf j` Go Kmhrslur Aar l< S a l��fseloI A� � ,,tft] C50,/ - } OA ` Q i .7?1 u p fr.. Cxr 9B8 !Ya 0 la �• �o 1. ts9��'°datH, 0 � V g U rd K ASS f,. ?, Grayn. 0 Py �t a . Koo Naun and Henry(2006) N . project area Figure 6.Portion of Emerson's 1880s map of Kailua showing Haun and Henry(2006)project area HAUN &ASSOCIATES 10 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report No . 1316 - 062517 { 1� l I • Y t J W dip ' y ti. It I Y tl ' { I I �Y 4 ♦R - Figure 7.Portion of 1928 USGS Kailua Quadrangle showing Haun and Henry project area HAUN &ASSOCIATES 11 TVK : ( a ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report No . 1316 - 062517 _ : \ j §s) \ / ( / F \ . , } / n _ . . }¥ �- \ /� c\ . � . f ! ' �l • ' \ - [ � G / - o § P �!;!\ §��\� :(\ � __���- � ■ o CL / //\}\ƒ $ zF \�\ co _ & HAUN &ASSOCITES12 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 Feature B is a roughly rectangular platform located in the northwestern corner of the project area adjacent to the Site 6366 wall to the south.This platform is 6.4 meters in length (northeast by southwest) and from 3.5 meters to 4.6 meters wide (Figure 9).The sides are built of stacked cobbles and small boulders that range in height from 0.2 to 0.8 meters. Portions of the north and south sides are faced, with collapse noted along the southern side. A linear projection, 1.3 meters long, 0.4 to 0.6 meters wide and 0.35 meters high extends to the north-northwest from the platform. The surface of the platform is comprised of a level cobble pavement with no cultural remains present. A flat pahoehoe slab is located on the surface of the feature and a waterworn coral cobble is located adjacent to the structure to the west. A survey marker that delineates the seaward boundary of the project area is located on top of the structure in the eastern portion. Gregg et al. (2006:43) excavated a 6.0 meter by 1.0 meter trench through the Feature B platform revealing a layer of dark brown silty loam over bedrock. Cultural material recovered consisted of midden, coral, charcoal, a basalt flake and brown glass. A sample of the charcoal was submitted for radiometric age determination,yielding an age range of AD 1485-1698 (2006:45). This platform was interpreted as a habitation platform by ACP. Its formal type, substantial construction (faced side, paved surface) and area (29.4 sq meters) indicates that the platform functioned as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure based on Cordy's (1981) model for residential architecture.The feature was recommended for no data recovery or preservation. Feature C is an oval-shaped platform located 12.0 meters south-southeast of Feature B in an area of uneven soil and outcrops.This platform is 3.1 meters long(north-northwest by south-southeast),2.4 meters wide and from 0.4 to 0.5 meters high (Figure 10). The sides of this feature are built of stacked cobbles and small boulders and the surface is comprised of a level cobble pavement. Branch coral was noted on the surface of the platform. This feature is located immediately adjacent to the western project boundary. This feature was interpreted as a ceremonial feature by Haun and Henry (2006) based on its formal type and proximity to the Feature H heiau discussed below; however,a recent review of the Gregg et al. (2006)AIS report indicates that human remains were identified within the feature during testing. This feature, along with Features F, G, and H, were recommended for preservation and included in the Kouneski et al. (2007) Burial Treatment Plan. Feature F is a small platform located adjacent to the south side of Feature C (see Figure 10).The western project area boundary extends across the inland edge of Feature F. This platform is 4.3 meters long(north-south) and 3.0 meters wide, with the sides built of stacked cobbles and small boulders that vary in height from 0.3 to 0.7 meters. The surface is a level cobble pavement with scattered branch coral. This feature was also interpreted as a ceremonial feature based on its formal type and proximity to Feature H; however, as with Feature C, a review of the Gregg et al. (2006)AIS report indicates that human remains were identified during testing. Feature G is an oval-shaped mound located adjacent to the southeast side of Feature F (see Figure 10), located partially within the project area.The platform is 5.6 meters long(northeast by southwest)and 4.0 meters wide and is collapsed on the north and northeastern side. The remaining sides are built of stacked cobbles and small boulders that range in height from 0.35 to 0.4 meters. The western side of the surface slopes to the southwest. The remaining surface is a level cobble pavement. Several fragments of branch coral were noted on the surface. A 1.0 by 1.0 meter test unit (TU-18) was excavated into the center of the platform by Haun and Henry (2006), revealing a stone layer(Layer 1),over a soil deposit(Layer 11),over bedrock(see Figure 10). Layer I consisted of 0.58 to 0.62 meters of tightly packed cobbles, pebbles and small boulders.Cultural remains from Layer I consisted of 13 fragments of waterworn coral and three branch coral fragments (not collected) and five waterworn marine shell fragments (28.7 grams). Layer 11 was comprised of 0.11 to 0.31 meters of a very dark brown (7.5YR 2.5/2) silt with 30-40% cobble and pebble inclusions. Cultural material from this deposit consisted of seven waterworn marine shell fragments(6.7 g). Feature G was interpreted as a probable burial platform by ACP; however the results of HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 13 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 Site 6366 Wall ` 1 Level soil Gregg et al.(2006)project area Haun and Henry(2006)project area (0.2) (0.35 0 0°0°0° O°O°O°000 0000 000°00000° °00000 OOOOOOOOoAo0o0000 (0.8) 0000000000x0000000 0.3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U O°O°o°O°O°O°o°0°O°0°0° (0.55) s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o b o 0 0 0 'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000°00000000000000000°O°o 0000000 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000o0o0Q0o0o000 00000 Q o 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 o Q o 0 O O O U D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O fl O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O Opaw O O O O O O O O O O O O 0-0-0-0-0 0 0 0 Q O Q Q Q Q 0 Q 0 0O Q Q Q Waterworn 0000000000©0©0000000©00000000000000 O coral 0000000000000000000000000000000000� Survey marker 00000000000000000°0000000000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 000000000000000o0 0000°000000Q Q O O O O 0 0 0 Gregg et al.(2006) O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Test trench 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O )) ) (0.6) O O O O O O O O O O 0 O p ]) (0.3) 0 0 0 O o 0 o O 0 0 0 o O ) 0000000000000000 0000000000 � J)) O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 O O O 0 O o O p O Q O O O O 0 �jJJ Q J� O O O O o O O 0 Q O O o 0 0 J 0 O o 0 O O o 0 O O O O J AJ 000000000000000000 O O O O �-)J ) ' 0O0Q0Q0Q0Q0Q0O0O O 0000000c,000Q00O000O j C' � 000000000000000000 000 O 1 00000000000000 000 00000000000 ' (0.55) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vertical slab 00 0 0 0 (0.6) Slope direction Flat slab N J J J JJ ]]) Collapse 3 ® M (0.7) 0 00, Cobble pavement S O O 0 8 fret ^/"%/' Faced side 0 2.5meters (0.3)=Heigbt in meters Figure 9.Site 24534,Feature B plan map HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 14 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 North Face \ 0 1 (0.4) O O 0 O Uneven soil and outcrops O O `(0. 400000 \ 11 p o p 0 C•C O 80cm Bedrock O O O ` 0000 (0.5 °O° ` (0.4) 0 1 00c Feature C O Feature F Layer I-'Tightly packed cobbles,pebbles and small (0,7) 00 O 00 boulders;Cultural remains present 0 C)0 0 °000 O ,��,��,� Layer11-Very dark brown(7.5YR 2.5/2)silt with CL h 30-40%a cobble and ebble inclusions; O°O A°O r�r�n n`l`l P Cultuml remains present (07) O°�po� (0.4) COC0 0 U a a o � ) (0-3) �CC�IC 0°0°)))))) (t C P Cc) 0 C)C� ) Feature G < < O O O C (0.4) 1C.' —�-:�✓ (0.35) �4 � Gregg et al.(2006)project area Haun and Henry(2006)project area • Branch coral -© D O©O O Op000° (0A) Shallow depression C O C O A °O C o C O°O O Ox C) O O O� C) C (0.6) 0°000000\0C O C O 000 0000000`..; Edge of pahoehoe outcrop �� CCC OC 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 O b 0 0 0 0 0 O)0 O-D 0000000 QC DD\b,�4OoD�D�°0600000 O O CCCCCCC o00v�,0°o000000bo0oo 0.25) O o o C o o w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Q O 0 0 Cobbleavement o p q p o P O 0 O O O O p O q O p D D 0 QD�00 00Cc,0Cc,0N DO 0o 000000000 r, O O 00080000 p°00°O°DO°DO°DO (0.$) ° O o ° ° ° ° ° (0.3)=Height in meters0000000 0000000 OC 0000000 C)000p0 O O CF � may, JJJ O O O 0C) 000000 000000 '�✓ ,YJ�� Slope (CC(CC 00000000 00000 P CC�CCCC 000000000 �0y0000 CC CCCCC 00°O°D°OOOS O°O° 0.5) North Wall of Site 24847, (C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t�0 0 0 0 Feature EL Eaclosun: 00000 DO 00 D0,�000 0000O00000O00 0 (0-95) 00p0p0p0p°p 00°O°O°0°O°O° (09) N Feature 0o�000C OC ODO° O O O O 3 m 8 Datum 16.0 feet V (1.0) Faced side (0.8) —4Vestera Project Area Boundary 0 5,0 ureters Figure 10.Site 24534,plan map of Features C,F,G and H and profile of TU-18 HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 15 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 subsurface testing conducted during the present project indicate that no burial is present. Its close proximity to the Feature H ceremonial platform(discussed below)suggests that Feature G is an associated ceremonial structure. Feature H is a large irregularly-shaped platform located to the south of Feature G (see Figure 10), partially within the present project area. The platform is 10.8 meters long (north-south) and from 4.1 to 6.9 meters wide. The north end of the structure is built against a low bedrock outcrop with the remaining sides of the structure comprised of stacked cobbles and small boulders that vary in height from 0.5 to 0.95 meters. A portion of the southern end is faced. The surface of the platform is a level cobble pavement with numerous fragments of waterworn and non-waterworn branch coral. Five shallow depressions are also present on the surface, ranging in length from 0.7 to 1.0 meters, in width from 0.4 to 0.7 meters and in depth from 0.35 to 0.5 meters below the surface of the platform. The northern wall of the Site 24847, Feature EL enclosure originates along the western side of the platform. ACP interpreted this feature as a burial structure apparently due to the presence of the branch coral. Examination of the platform during the present project indicates that the feature possibly is a small heiau or shrine. This is based on the large size of the platform (74. 5 sq m), the presence of the abundant coral offerings,and the depressions,which potentially supported idols. Site 24842 Site 24842 is a complex of two features located in the southwestern portion of the project area at approximately 52 ft elevation, in an area of level soil with scattered cobbles.The features consist of a platform (Feature A) and a low pavement (Feature B) located in an area 9.4 meters long (north-south) by 5.7 meters wide (Figure 11). The Feature A platform is located at the north end of the site. It is roughly oval in shape and is 5.7 meters long (east- northeast by west-southwest) and 4.0 meters wide.The east, south and west sides are stacked cobbles and small boulders that range in height from 0.25 to 0.55 meters in height.The north side has collapsed outward and ranges in height from 0.2 to 0.4 meters.The surface is a level cobble pavement with no cultural remains present. A 1.0 by 1.0 meter test unit (TU-12) was excavated into the surface of the platform in the northwestern portion. This excavation revealed an architectural layer (Layer 1) over a soil deposit (Layer 11; see Figure 11). Layer I consisted of 0.43 to 0.5 meters of tightly packed cobbles and small boulders,with no cultural remains. Layer 11 was comprised of a very dark grayish brown (7.5YR 2.5/2) silt with 30% pebble and gravel inclusions. This deposit was excavated to 0.54 to 0.59 meters below Layer I (or 0.97 meters below the surface of the platform)where a human cranium was encountered. The excavation of TU-12 was terminated on identification of the cranium. The Layer 11 soil was returned to the unit and the architectural layer was carefully reconstructed. Cultural remains noted but not collected from Layer 11 consisted of charcoal and a waterworn coral pebble. The Feature B pavement abuts the Feature A platform to the south.The pavement is irregularly-shaped and is 5.4 meters long(north-northwest by south-southeast) and from 2.0 to 4.3 meters wide.The east end of the pavement is bordered by a bedrock outcrop and the north side abuts the south side of Feature A. The surface of Feature B consists of level cobbles that ranges in height from 0.0 to 0.3 meters above the surrounding ground surface and 0.25 to 0.3 meters below the surface of Feature A. No cultural remains were noted on the surface of Feature B. Site 24842 is interpreted as a permanent habitation site that also was used for burial, probably subsequent to the habitation use. The Feature A platform is interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure, based on its formal type, substantial construction (paved surface) and area (23.2 sq meters). The presence of the human remains also indicates a burial function.The Feature B pavement likely functioned as an associated lanai or work area based on its formal type and spatial relationship with Feature A. No cultural remains were present on the surface of the features or on the surrounding terrain which consists of very shallow soil with numerous cobbles and bedrock outcrops.The site is unaltered and in fair condition.The site was recommended for preservation. HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 16 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report No . 1316 - 062517 Collapse (0.2) 0 8 feet Datum Level soil and scattered cobbles n _jM 0 2.5meters 1 (0.25) C-�rU U U UC'DOQODO C,a U (0.4) rrr 0 0 � ° °0°0°0°0°o°OD0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a (C)C"- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000000000 0000OO0000000 O O 0-0-O O O O O O O O O S TU-12 (�O00 O O&C 0000000000000000 O O O 0O OO OO O© OO 00 O�OO�O©�OO�OO�D 000 00 0000000C (C OOO 0 � � D00000000 Feature OO 000 00000000000O (0.55) l( 000 o O O 0000 OOOOOOOO0000DOCC C D000DODOOOD000000000000000 0000p00000000000 000p00000. 0000000000000000000000 O )000000000000000000000 (0.55) 000000000000000000r'r, -) OOOOOoO O CO) �0. Oo 00.0°000°00000 J o0 0- 00000000 J 0x0((0.25)- ` Op0 0. 0->0000000U 000000000000 Level soil and scattered cobbles 0 0 0 0 0 0 � (0.3)ODo0o0o0o0c(0.15) (0.35) o000°000000000000OOOC/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000°000 0 0°00°00°°o°c Feature ' .r, °°°00000000 ,•• °0°00000000°00000 � (0.25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vl _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D Level soil and scattered cobbles o000000o0o0 000 0o0o°000°0°0 /o 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c ;; (0.25) °000000000000O0O000 000b000C ' 0000000000000000000000000) D00000000000000000000 00C " O0O0Dp00000o 0O000O0DOOOC " 0p000pOp0p0p0p0p0p0p0p0 O 1 North Face O O O a O O O O O O O (0.0) 0 O O O O O 0 0 O O O 000000000000000000000000c- — 0 000000000000000000000000) I -0000000000000000000000000 ��, (0.3) -) ° D O D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 D O O D D O O D D O D O D O O O O O O O O O O C F \0000000000000000000 1000D0000000000000C 00000000 II 00000000000000on °000°°000 r Human cranium O p O n 0 to0cm ,,z Edge of pahoehoe outcrop Unexcavated 0 100cm p o 0 0 0 o D o 0 Cobble pavement Layer I_Tightly packed cobbles and pebbles; O O O 0 0 No cultural remains Layer II-Very dark brown(7.5YR 2.5/2) (0.3)-Height in meters silt with 30%pebble and gravel inclusions;Charcoal and human 1 Slope direction remains present Figure 11.Site 24842 plan map and profile of TU-12 HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 17 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report No . 1316 - 062517 SEARCH FOR LINEAL AND CULTURAL DESCENDANTS Publication of Burial Notices Legal notices were published in newspapers of local and statewide distribution, and the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) newsletter. The notices contained (a) project name and location information, (b) identification of several contact persons, (c) names of families associated with the vicinity, and (d) the landowner/applicant's intent to preserve the burials in place. Copies of each Affidavit of Publication are attached to this plan (Appendix D). Notices were published as follows: West Hawai'i Today - Wednesday (July 24, 2016), Friday (July 27, 2016) and Sunday (July 29, 2016); Honolulu-Star Advertiser-Wednesday(July 24,2016), Friday(July 27,2016)and Sunday(July 29, 2016); Ka Wai Ola—August('Aukake)2016 The notices requested that any person having information concerning the unmarked graves in the project area should contact Alan Haun, Haun &Associates and/or State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) Burial Sites staff. There are no kuleana awardees known for the property. Consultation Draft copies of this Burial Treatment Plan will be distributed to all DLNR-SHPD recognized lineal and cultural descendants. As of January 5,2017,only one descendant has contacted Alan Haun regarding the burials within the project area. This individual was asked to contact SHPD to obtain a decendancy application. If other descendants make contact in the future,their comments and concerns will be considered and incorporated into the Final Burial Treatment Plan for the project. The results of the consultation process, including comments from the Hawai'i Island Burial Council (HIBC)will be documented and summarized for inclusion in the Final Burial Treatment Plan. Community consultation was also undertaken by Kouneski and Kennedy (2007:12) consisting of publishing burial notices in The Honolulu Advertiser/Star Bulletin, West Hawaii Today and Ka Wai Ola in March and April of 2006. ACP was contacted by West Hawai'i resident Mr. Clarence Medeiros who informed them that he is a descendant of the individuals buried on the property.According to Kouneski and Kennedy: In addition, Mr. Keola Lindsey of the Department of land and Natural Resources, Burials Program was consulted to obtain additional information concerning individuals who may have responded to the advertisements as well as to provide concurrence of Mr. Medeiros'status as a descendent. Mr. Lindsey was able to confirm that Mr. Medeiros is indeed a descendent and informed ACP that no other individuals had responded to the advertisements. (2007:12) HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 18 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report No . 1316 - 062517 PROPOSED TREATEMENT OF BURIAL SITES Forms of Preservation Preservation is a mitigation strategy in which a historic property and the qualities that contribute to its significance are preserved. Mitigation consists of specific measures to avoid, limit or minimize adverse effects resulting from development activity. Specific mitigation measures can consist of documentation and archaeological excavation (data recovery) and preservation, among others. DLNR-SHPD rules recognize several forms of preservation (HAR §13-13-277). These consist of avoidance and protection (conservation), stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, reconstruction, interpretation and appropriate cultural use. Avoidance and Protection (Conservation) Site 24842 and Features C, F, G, and H of Site 24534 will be preserved in perpetuity by means of avoidance and protection (conservation). This means that the sites will be avoided during all phases of development and protected by restricting access during and after development. This form of preservation is the most appropriate manner of mitigating the effects of development within the parcel because the sites can be avoided. Penalties are severe for damage to a historic property on state or private land, including the imposition of monetary fines (Hawai'i Revised Statutes§6E-11). Conservation is recommended for Site 24842 and Features C, F, G,and H of Site 24534. Site protection will require an active effort on the part of the landowner to ensure development does not inadvertently cause impacts to the historic properties.This plan formalizes the long-term commitment site preservation will entail.The location of the sites will not be available for public access and no additional forms of preservation are proposed. Conservation Measures Conservation of Site 24842 and Features C, F, G, and H of Site 24534 will require immediate, short-term and long- term protection measures.These measures provide for actions to ensure the sites are protected in perpetuity and that damage does not occur through negligent or unintentional means and can be implemented as soon as feasible. The landowner will be responsible for implementing the preservation measures contained in this plan. The immediate conservation measures include establishing permanent buffers around Site 24842, and around the portions of Features C, F, G and H of Site 24534 within the project area. A permanent buffer of 20 ft is proposed (Figure 12). Site 24842 will be enclosed by the permanent buffer, and the permanent buffer at Site 24534 will stop at the western project area boundary.The buffers will be established by a licensed land surveyor as preservation easements.These easements will be registered as metes and bounds descriptions with the Bureau of Conveyances. Short-term conservation measures include construction of a physical barrier to mark a temporary buffer zone around the perimeter of the sites to control site accessibility during development and removing weedy vegetation from the site area within the permanent buffer zone. Long-term conservation measures include the installation of the permanent buffer zone barriers as described above.The buffer around Site 24842 and Features C, F, G and H of Site 24534 will be defined low by stacked stone walls constructed of local basalt boulders and cobbles. The enclosing walls will have a gate for which both lineal and cultural descendants shall have access to the feature. The permanent buffers are the limit of future land- altering modifications. The landowner will maintain the current site condition with the stipulation that SHPD will be notified immediately if there is any degradation or change condition. HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 19 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 R e p o r t N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 park ll Fea. C •� Fea. F �► Fea. G �. I r Site 24534 / 7 I I + Fea. H 1 ' 50 6 I 5 r r� 4 r I � W4s rn project area boundary 3 I � � k I I � � L r r r Ir r Site 24842 +J I Permanent buffer wall ............. `"""fir, • r 6f 60 r No Build setback . I Temporary buffer I Figure 12.Proposed preservation buffers HAUN &ASSOCIATES 20 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report No . 1316 - 062517 Immediate Conservation Two conservation measures can be implemented as soon as feasible upon approval of this Burial Treatment Plan. A licensed land surveyor is required to establish the metes and bounds description of the permanent buffer zones for Site 24842 and Features C, F, G, and H of Site 24534 as described above. All requirements and restrictions of this plan, including a metes and bounds description of the sites and the permanent buffer zones will be incorporated into the property deed as a restrictive covenant and will be recorded with the Bureau of Conveyances with a copy sent to SHPD. Registration with the Bureau of Conveyances will include a copy of the Burial Treatment Plan. Short-Term Conservation Short-term conservation measures will be implemented both prior to and during all phases of development.These measures include erecting a temporary physical barrier around Site 24842 and Features C, F,G,and H of Site 24534 to provide a visual barrier around the sites while earth-moving machinery is in operation. At Site 24842, the temporary buffer zone barrier will surround the permanent buffer zone at a distance of 50 ft, or 70 ft from the edges of the site (see Figure 12).The temporary buffer zone barrier at Features C, F, G, and H of Site 24534 will be of variable width, ranging from 17.5 ft to 50 ft from the permanent buffer zone,or 37.5 ft to 70 ft from the edge of the preservation features.The variable width is required to allow access into the property from Naniloa Drive. The temporary buffer zone will be delineated by an orange safety fence that is ultraviolet ray resistant high-density polyethylene with diamond or square mesh,with a minimum weight of 20 lbs per 100 ft by 4 ft, held in place with metal posts. Use of such fencing is only a short-term measure and can be removed once all construction activity is complete, or when the permanent buffer zone is installed. Construction personnel will be explicitly notified as to the nature and location of the preservation site (protected site with state-imposed monetary penalties for disturbance), the significance of the buffer zone (no earthmoving equipment inside the fencing), and the meaning of the buffer zone barrier(visual warning for equipment operators). An archaeological monitor will be present during initial grubbing and grading.The monitor will be present to insure the protection of the burial sites and to identify any previously unidentified cultural material that might be revealed by construction activity. Elimination of non-native weedy vegetation within the sites and permanent buffer zones will be undertaken as development progresses. Vegetation clearing within the permanent preservation buffer will be undertaken with hand tools. Hand tools can include clippers, loppers, rakes, shovels, wheelbarrows, line trimmers, handsaws, machetes, and chainsaws. Mature non-native trees with trunks 1-ft in diameter or more will be left in place, if removal will compromise archaeological features or deposits, but otherwise can be removed. Large trees will not be removed at the site without prior approval of a professional archaeologist to avoid inadvertent damage to the features and deposits. Long-Term Conservation Long-term conservation measures include permanently delineating the permanent buffer zones surrounding Site 24842 and Features C, F, G, and H of Site 24534. The buffer zones will be defined by low stacked stone walls constructed of local basalt boulders and cobbles.The walls will be built to resemble traditional Hawaiian structures using local stone. The walls will be 2 ft wide and 3 ft high and have a dry stacked appearance with a concealed concrete core for stability. A narrow opening through the wall will provide access for recognized descendants and maintenance. Additionally, a No Build setback will surround the permanent buffers at a distance of 10 ft (see Figure 12). No vertical buildings will be constructed within the setback, but landscaping, sidewalks, parking and other uses will be permitted. HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 21 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 Site maintenance is the responsibility of the landowner. The primary goal of the maintenance provision is to preserve Site 24842 and Features C, F, G, and H of Site 24534 in their current condition, with negligible human intrusion. If a change in site condition is observed,as a result of natural or human agency,the SHPD will be notified immediately.The covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R)for the subdivision will explicitly inform lot owners of the presence and significance of the preservation sites. Signage It is recommended that a small sign of durable material be placed beside the burial sites to inform subdivision residents about the significance of the sites and penalties for disturbing them.The following text is suggested: Native Hawaiian Cultural Site 50-10-37-XXXXX Please Respect and Protect This Site Damage to the site is punishable under Chapter 6E-11, Hawaii Revised Statutes. One or more interpretative signs will be installed within the subdivision informing residents and guests about the history and significance of the cultural sites in the project area. The signs will be based on the results of data recovery work and consultation with recognized descendants. Landscaping and Maintenance Features C, F, G, and H of Site 24534 are located adjacent to the proposed access road into the development and would be visible from passersby. It is therefore proposed that a hedge of naupaka or similar native Hawaiian species be planted along the inland side of the permanent buffer to serve as a visual screen. Responsibility for maintenance of Site 24842 and Features C, F, G, and H of Site 24534 will lie with the landowner. Long term maintenance of the sites will consist of litter removal,vegetation control,and site condition monitoring. Access for Lineal and/or Cultural Descendants Access to the burial sites for appropriate cultural activities would be permitted to any lineal and/or cultural descendant formally recognized by the Hawai'i Island Burial Council (HIBC) and the DLNR-SHPD in accordance with the administration procedures contained within Section 13-300-35: "Recognition of lineal and cultural descendants" (DLNR 2003). If descendants wish to visit the grave sites they will need to coordinate with the landowners and provide them 24 hour notice. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BURIAL TREATMENT PLAN Preservation measures contained in the BSCAPP would be implemented by the landowners as soon as feasible following receipt by the applicant of DLNR written confirmation of mutual agreement to these measures. All requirements and restrictions of the restrictive covenant including a metes and bounds description of the preservation buffer zones would be incorporated into the property deed and recorded with the Bureau of Conveyances. INADVERTENT DISCOVERIES If human remains are inadvertently discovered during data recovery or development, Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC is committed to care for the iwi with respect and dignity, in a culturally appropriate and sensitive manner, and in compliance with all laws. Work in the area of the discovery will be halted. DLNR-SHPD and the HIBC Kona representative consulted for guidance in accordance with the statutory consultation process in Hawai'i Revised Statutes Chapter 6E-43.Temporary measures to protect the remains during the consultation process will consist of HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 22 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report No . 1316 - 062517 wrapping or covering the remains with kapa at the location where they were discovered. The location will be stabilized if necessary, and secured from any further disturbance. Appropriate measures will be taken to protect the remains from the elements (rain, sun exposure, etc.). Every feasible effort will be made to preserve the remains in place. If a determination were made to relocate the remains by DLNR-SHPD, then Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC would offer a relocation site near Site 24534 in the open space created by reconfiguring Lot 61. HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 23 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report No . 1316 - 062517 TRANSLATION OF HAWAIIAN WORDS' ahupua'a-traditional Hawaiian land unit usually extending from the uplands to the sea heiau-pre-Christian place of worship,shrine `ili-next in importance to ahupua'a and usually a subdivision of an ahupua'a konohiki—headman of an ahupua'a land division under the chief kuleana-small piece of property,as within an ahupua'a Mahele-land division of 1848 '-from wehewehe.org REFERENCES Beamer, Kamanamaikalani 2014 No Makou Ka Mana Liberating a Nation. Kamehameha Publishing. Honolulu. Chinen,Jon J. 1958 The Great Mahele:Hawaii's Land Division of 1848. University of Hawai'i Press. Honolulu. Conde,J.,and G. Best 1973 Sugar Trains:Narrow Gauge Rails of Hawaii. Felton,California:Glenwood Publishers Cordy, R.H. 1981 A Study of Prehistoric Social Change:The Development of Complex Societies in the Hawaiian Islands. Academic Press. New York. DNLR(Department of Land and Natural Resources 1996 Department of Land and Natural Resources, Historic Preservation Division, Rules of Practice and Procedure Relating to Burial Sites and Human Remains. 2003 Hawai'i Administrative Rules, Title 13, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Subtitle 13, State Historic Preservation Division Rules. Gregg, E., M. Elison,J. Moore and J. Kennedy 2006 An Archaeological Survey of a Property located at TMK: 7-7-08:01, 99 & 7-7-10:72 in Kapala'alaea 2nd North Kona District, Island of Hawai'i. Archaeological Consultants of the Pacific report prepared for Mr. Tom Stewart. Haun A. and D. Henry 2006 Archaeological Inventory Survey,TMK: 7-7-08:121, Land of Kapala'alaea 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawai'i. Haun &Associates Report 422 prepared for Clark Realty. Haun,A.,J.D. Henry,J.Jimenez, M. Kirkendall, K. Maly,and T.Wolforth. 1998 Ali'i Highway, Phased Mitigation Program, Phase I—Archaeological Inventory Survey. North Kona District, Island of Hawai'i. PHRI report 1320 prepared for County of Hawai'i. HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 24 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 Report No . 1316 - 062517 Indices 1929 Indices of Awards Made by the Board of Land Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Islands. Territory of Hawai'i, Honolulu. Kamakau,S. 1961 Ruling Chiefs of Hawai'i. Honolulu:The Kamehameha Schools Press. Kelly, M. 1983 Na Mala O Kona:Gardens of Kona.A History of Land Use in Kona, Hawai'i. Departmental Report Series 83- 2. Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for the Department of Transportation,State of Hawai'i. Kouneski, E.,and J. Kennedy 2007 A Burial Treatment Plan for a property located at TMK: 7-7-08:01, 99 & 7-7-10:72 in Kapala'alaea 2nd North Kona District, Island of Hawai'i. Archaeological Consultants of the Pacific report prepared for Mr. Tom Stewart. Moffat, R. M. and G.L. Kirkpatrick 1995 Surveying the Mahele: Mapping the Hawaiian Land Revolution. Palapala'aina. Editions Limited, Honolulu. NR n.d. Native Register of Kuleana Claims Recorded by the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Islands. Manuscript. Hawai'i State Archives. NT n.d. Native Testimony Recorded by the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles in the Hawaiian Islands. Manuscript. Hawai'i State Archives. Pukui, M.,and S. Elbert 1986 Place Names of Hawaii. University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu Schilt,A.R. 1984 Subsistence and Conflict in Kona, Hawai'i.An Archaeological Study of the Kuakini Highway Realignment Corridor.Departmental Report Series 84-1. Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for Department of Transportation,State of Hawai'i. Speakman,C.E.,Jr. 1978 An Informal History of the Hawaiian Island. Pueo Press. San Rafael. Waihona'Aina Corporation 2000 The Mahele Database,waihona.com. Wehewehe.org 2016 Hawai'i Electronic Library -Na Puke Wehewehe 'Olelo Hawaii HAUN &ASSOCIATES 1 25 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 R e p o r t N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 APPENDIX A - NOVEMBER 21, 2006 SHPD AIS ACCEPTANCE LETTER "'0'h FA R .YOYO UNG ivavlolu�oN A'rtRA[sWn¢NANAaeuen[r LINDA LINGLE A~ t45a ly OOVFRN00.0F1GWAQ � §.��, co ROBMTKMA9 A t blPVfY N6tFL R-IwNn � 4 ' ➢6AN NAKANO �'�� �� �TJ� Af� AG7QI60FPlRYO01.CffS.WM1'141 . �•�'-�...-•WJ AVVAS1C11780OitCFB . N eoATwa ANo ocr xrcarwnoN auuAu oe mmn:vANcv CaepOASNIN ON WAl'6R Y`M10.KIIneIAOINvl3' STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NAWRALRESOURCES aea,�a,a VI YABVOLIWELgAIID RP_9FRVe CONYlSSNN. STATE 1nsTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION nA 601 KAMOKILABOULEVARA,ROOM 555 KAMLEI,HAWAN 96707 November 21,2006 Alan Hann,Ph.D. LOG NO:2006,3733 Hann and Associates DOC NO:0611MK24 HCR 1 Box 4730 Archaeology K=u,Hawaii 96749 Dear Dr.Haun: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review— Revised Archaeological Inventory Survey Report for the Land of Kapalaalaca 2 Ahupuna,North Kona District,Island of Hawaii TMK 3 7-7-008:121 Thank you for the opportunity to review this revised report which our staff received on May 4, 2006 (Haun and Henry 2006,Archaeological Inventory Survey TMK- 7-7-08:121, .Land of Kapalaalaea 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii...Haun and Associates ms). We have previously provided comments on the draft report(LOG NO: 2006.1577/DOC NO: 06051T08),and recommended revisions prior to concurrence with significance assessments. Our initial requested revisions have been acceptably addressed in the revised report. We concur that all of the sites are significant under Criterion"D"for their information content.We also agree that SIHP 50-10-37-24534 and-24542 are also significant under Criterion"E",traditional cultural significance.These sites consist of a ceremonial and permanent habitation site complex(SffT 50-10-37- 24534)and a permanent habitation site complex with an associated burial(SIHP 50-10-37-24542). We also agree with the mitigation commitments that no further work is necessary at SIHP 50-10-37-6366, -6368, and -6369, all associated with historic livestock control and agriculture. All of the other sites, which consist of temporary and permanent habitation and agricultural sites and complexes, should be subjected to data recovery as mitigation(SHQ 50-10-37-24838,-24839,-24840,-24841,-24843,-24844, -24845, -24846, and-24847). Alternatively, the property owner may wish to consider preservation for some or all of these historic properties. We find this revised report to be acceptable.We anticipate submittal of a preservation plan for the non- burial features at SIHP 50-50-10-24534 and-24542),and a burial treatment plan for the burial feature at the latter site(-24542).We also await a data recovery plan for those sites for which data recovery rather than preservation is proposed. As always,if you disagree with our comments or have questions,please contact Dr.Melissa Kirkendall at(808)243-5169 as soon as possible to resolve these concerns. Aloha, arse hinen,Administrator S e Historic Preservation Division MK:kf HAUN &ASSOCIATES 26 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 R e p o r t N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 APPENDIX B - MAY 22, 2006 SHPD AIS ACCEPTANCE LETTER P.1 LWbA LV44CCL2 S• til V[TIa T.Young ppy�m{d15G1cAII R� �1910 v b�soo �yua.0� V �mwwra.sacwn Yyt,,�,q,,, NOaz*Tx WL%MDA Jk Q '��RI ruws�wyoa.x�ayniw ✓rR3�li A MrMYAe(y �mPW9IY 6f YnTl��,y,ry,Q�, STATE OF HAWAII "�^"° ""°°••T• cnwav„nw,uoaswam sr„xd fy., DEPARTMF,NT 01,LAND AND NATURAL RESQCJRCES STAnHISTORIC PRESERVATIQNI)1vISIo:V I.ry 601 KAMOKILAHOULEVARD,ROOM 555 KAPOLEI,HAWAII 96707 May 22,2006 Mr, Joseph Kennedy LOG NO:2006.159a Archaeological Consultants of the Pacific DOC NO:0605J'T'31 59-624 Pupukea Road Archaeology Halelwa,Hawaii 96712 Dear Mr.Stewart SUBJECT: Chapter 6E42 Historic Preservation Review-- An Archaeological Inventory Survey Kapala`slaea tad Ahupua`a,North Kona District,Island of Hawaii TMK: 3 7-7-008:601 099&7-7-010:72 Thank you for the opportunity to review the aforementioned revised report by Gregg,Elison&Kennedy (2006) which we received on April 26, 2006. The report summarizes the findings of an archaeological inventory survey of an 8.175 acre parcel that re-identified four historic properties and identified seven previously unidentified sites. Archaeological Consultants of the Pacific (ACP) assessed site-6302 as significant under all criteria, as previously determined by DL1*R- Sf3PD, and recommended preservation. ACP assessed sites -6366 and -24039 as significant under criteria D and C, and recommended preservation. ACP assessed sites -24038, -24529, - 24533, and -24535 as significant under criterion D and recommended no further work. ACP assessed sites -24530, -24531, -24532, and -24534 as significant under criteria D and E, and recommended preservation and monitoring, and the development of a Burial Treatment Plan. We agree with these assessments, and determine these sites to be significant under the criteria listed above. We also agree with the proposed treatments for the sites, and look forward to reviewing a Monitoring Plan and a Burial Treatment Plan_ Please contact Dr. Julie Taomia at 808-327-3691 if you have questions or coucems. Aloha, anie Chinen,Administrator State astoric Preservation Division JT HAUN &ASSOCIATES 27 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 R e p o r t N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 APPENDIX C - HIBC COUNCIL DETERMINATION �41.M A NIICII flIVM Ln'7Gf.S �{�r M� c W68CC N1C,'p,� .yLd Cyd any ..vsr�iv. "=T. o�rrvmeerIA ox- -west y'�s� '.C" Woaa.r--.vor W W9p miv.YAMQI [aoWpel V Alp t1YO110,iYMppllT STATE OF HAWAII, "'•`�'� •�• '�warar�� DEPARTMENT OF LR,IKD AKD NATURAL RESOURCES aw.00uw m.®a�n , rOST oFlrtc E aox 62 r HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 May 29,2007 Tom Stewart Log No:2007.1644 Ka'upulehu Ladd,LLC Doc No:0704KLo9 P.O.Box 617 Kapa'au,Hawai'i 96755 Dear Mr. Stewart: SUBJECT: Hawai'i Island Burial Council Determination S1HP Sites 24530, 24531 Features 8, E, F, G, H, I and J, 24532 Features B and C and.24534 Features C,D,E,F,G,H and J Kapala'ala'ea Ahupua'a,North Kona District,Rawai'i Island TMK(3)7-7-098;101.099 and 7-7-010.072 On April I9,2007 at a duly noticed meeting of the Hawai'i Island Burial Council (HIBC)with a quorum of members present, the HIBC concurred with your request and voted to preserve in place the burials within the above mentioned SIHP Sites which are situated on the subject tax map key parcels. Pursuant to 6E-43(d), Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS), the Department of Land and Natural Resources- State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) has ninety (90) days from the date of the HMC's determination to approve a final preset-vation plan for the subject burial site. At the April 19, 2007 HWC meeting,the HBC recommended the following: 1. That the exposed portion of SW Site 24530 be sealed to protect the burial(s)within the site. 2. That a 10 foot no build setback be established from the 20 foot permanent buffer and the temporary buffer be increased from 40 to 70 feet. 3. That an archaeological monitor be present during grubbing and grading on the property. HAUN &ASSOCIATES 28 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 2 p.3 "Com Stewart Page 2 4. That the HIBC be allowed to review subdivision, development and grading plans once they are finalized and submitted to the County of Hawai'i for review and that the County of Hawai'i be notified of this request. The SHPD is currently reviewing these recommendations and would like to begin discussions with you regarding whether you would be willing to implement them. Mr. Mnano Rodrigues of my office will contact you to discuss your proposed Burial Treatment plan, Sincerely el ' A. Chinen, mi e Historic Preservation Division C Members,Hawai'i Island Burial Council Clarence A.Medeiros,Jr.,descendant Ruby McDonald,descendant County of Hawaii-Planning Department County of Hawai'i-Department of Public Works Hinano Rodrigues, SHPD HAUN &ASSOCIATES 29 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 R e p o r t N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 APPENDIX D - AFFIDAVITS OF BURIAL NOTICE PUBLICATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION IN THE MATTER OF } PUBLIC NOTICE ) f } I } STATE OF HAWAII } )SS. City and County of Honolulu } Doc.Date: JUL 2 9 2016 #Pages: 1 Notary Name:Patricia K.Reese Firet.fudictadCircuit DOC.Description: Affidavit of ,,``ttrrrrrrir�F� Publication :•S��OA K. R�F'��� PiI13lSCN01NE NOTARY A9 paeans M tg tatmauW=Mffag ruenahed J lx •IUB 7�[j PUBLIC, _ �ftn2an��Plead nods TMH:(3)T-T- _ pared m Knpnla'elaqa 2 C W-Ma No. z AlmpsWa,Rod Kona 8lW4 bland of Rtnfl an ry Signature Dale 56467k"SIMM to wind Herbert Poepon,Budd --.•' �� $Ms SMKO,311111MAft Prsavdlon MMSM ,q OF"F" ~` lam),180s1 933-76K eo Welmla SbUt EU III 56720;or Alan Kam,Noun 8 AsodaK 73-188 Barbara Suzuki being duly sworn,deposes and says that she is a cler ddPyr hitithorized �No Rd,on ol Kn 6mt�40y0,,( 325- to execute this affidavit of Oahu Publications,Inc.publisher of 71te Honolulu aamda� bTrartmeeN13s win a w In Star-Advertiser,MidWeeleThe Garden Island,West Hawaii Today,and Hawaii Ands ogee beet eK LLC proposes to plasm the Tribune-Herald,that said newspapers are newspapers of general circulation in the Main In plane In aeoodmroe wth a plan prwsred In anadertlState of Hawaii,and that the attached notice is true notice as was published in the 0°w any ama5 W dem and"� P Kx appioral d tlIE Hawat'i bread ttudn Galore A9 aforementioned newspapers as follows: alter Wallas shone respond*a"'"*139} Honolulu Star-Advertiser 0 times on: W" d�wm&&g descent nNa�aa IFa Pari unul%or cubral-meat from meslors bused 1:k the smta ehoprm'a of OVA Fan*names amodaem r4h Nm praPady eloryue'a Idesllaed Mid Week 0 times on: shroops hhrodml dammed r ="are Karprrd (LrA 2374).HadaISm(WA 73761 Kalama(LCA 4452HI.Kedge 11CA 5M KI,Kabma(M 5875, The Garden Island 0 times on: Kgaha(M 5679),K�'�IICt 58801 Hbo'o (L.SM),Wei(M 513(lb 418M(IrJL 9235131, arrt Pohl(LLA 1 421 (YA0895915 7/24,7/27,T/29/18l Hawaii Tribune-Herald 0 times on- West Hawaii Today 3 times on: 07124,07/27,07/29/2018 Other Publications: 0 times on: And thjQ affiant is not to or in any way interested in the above entitled matter. P��.• Fs Q: NOTARY PUBLIC Bar Suzuki Subscribed W wee befere• this, qday of, AD.20�� ~' A� x 1� 1 Petri a ease,N/ota%i,�ibli /Of, a First Judicial Circuit,State of Hawaii My fission esp Ad# 0000895915 SP-NO.: L.N. HAUN &ASSOCIATES 30 T M K : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 0 0 8 : 1 2 1 R e p o r t N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 AFFUDAVIT OF PUBLICATION IN THE MATTER OF } PUBLIC NOTICE } } } } STATE OF HAWAII } )SS. City and County of Honolulu I Doc.Date: JUL ? 'l 27?G #pages: T Patricia K.Reese Notary Name: Fl�dudiclaiCircuit A9 penia hirling Informmton Donee Nathe Nana9e bn i,data premnt ad8da 7�AIIC(3°m)7W7- Doc.Description• Affidavit of StNr�r++,,+� 008c321, 9 11A-90,PMW to itep4MLIM 2 Publication �� \GSA K Rlc�,`� m N°died P°apau�l �� . Fs Sbs*addK State ffftdc nasamtloa Man 4;•'NOTARY ..,m AlinIIaueItaan �o Ad 73-1189 PUBLIC = Kenum A,e ft.italin Fan 19 98740,(808)315• JUL 2 9 2016 = _ 24 Te d &B blials WM couir lit comm.Pb. actorthrn vph 1IR5,Chapter BE.the aw elt Nn Slgneture Date ••. MA67 Alfie, b Inert,ILC pmpoaea to pmaene the :�ip�,' ....•• yy :� WWI$In PIm In ammdame tdlh a pian mpared In Iona ddionwith airy Id4aw datem ats am with 8m appmrol a<Ne Haaarl Wand aarial CKWL All Barbara Suzuki being duly sworn,deposes and says that she is a cledt,dligtithorizcd I MM slued aarpoad W 3 thUb(30) wiftSR to execute this affidavit of Oahu Puhlirations,Inc.publisher of The Honolulu dei of this of�B I" m � adequatay daeaaum atra8rg deaaenY Coni horn t fie Maitre Star-Advertiser,Midweek,The Garden Island,West Hawaii Today,and Hawaii "Wan ramekin,ar a.1tlrml desnat from enmaaon Tribuna•Herald,that said newspapers are newspapers of general circulation in the bndad In as Sana ah 4wa'a or d x t.mini'ahe asaW-W v9b the fmp rLy Rh;u s boof ed State of Hawaii,and that the attached notice is true notice as was published in the 11=0 hxtodral daament remarch am Muni aforementioned newspapers as follows: (VA 1374L XwAlaihm(ICA MOL mimina tLcA 445TF4.KaaAe9+m(ICA 5835!11,Warm CLCA-T5, Honolulu Star-Advertiser 3 times on: lWaN WA 5679},Wilamoe(LCA NW).Kkua (LCA SM Wal 00 WX%Ilab OM 9139a), 07124,07127,07!29!2011 B and M(LCA IQM)• (SAe95781 T/24,T/27,7/29116) MidWeek 0 times on: The Garden Island 0 times on: Hawaii Tribune-Herald 0 times on: West Hawaii Today 0 times on: Other Publications: 0 times on: An that affiant is noparty to or in any way interested in the above entitled matter. NOTARY m - PU3:.IC BArbara Suzuki - _ 11►r-- Comm.Ma aE� Subscribed to an m before me thi �� y of _A.D.2117 Patrici csc,Notary Pu tc /th =Judicial Circuit,State of Hawaii My c ion expi 07 2 Adis 0000895781 SP-N0,: L.N. HAUN &ASSOCIATES 31 TMK : ( 3 ) 7 - 7 - 008 : 121 Report N o . 1 3 1 6 - 0 6 2 5 1 7 LEO`EULE `aukake2016 25 TRUSTEE MESSSAGES PUBLIC NOTICE requested to contact Herbert Poepoe,Burial Sites Specialist, State Historic Preserva- Continued from page 23 uon Division(SHPD),(808)933-7650,40 Po'okela Street, Hilo, HI 96720; or Alan >t ,. r Haun,Haun&Associates,73-1168 Kahuna A'o Rd.;Kailua Kona,HI 96740,(808)325- 2402.Treatment of the burials will occur in accordance with HRS,Chapter 6E.The apph- w cant,Aldersgate Investment,LLC proposes to preserve the burials in place in accordance with a plan prepared in consultation with any x identified descendants and with the approval .r of the Hawaii Island Burial Council. All interested parties should respond within thirty p (30)days of this notice and provide infor- mation to SHPD adequately demonstrating descent from the Native Hawaiian remains, or cultural descent from ancestors buried in the same ahupua'a or district. Family names associated with the property ahupua'a iden- tified through historical document research �EDUC T!N L are Kanewai(LCA 2374),Keauikalima(LCA 2376), Kalama(LCA 4452H), Kaukalima BU � 1 (LCA 5635M),K Kaiama(LCA 5675,Kipu'u (LCA 5679),Kahiamoe(LCA 5680),Hipu'u 1 (LCA 6082),Na'ai(LCA 6130),Haki(LCA M 9235$),and Puhi(LCA 10642). _ Scientific Consultant Services,Inc.(SCS) is preparing Cultural Impact Assessments for the proposed Welakahao Multi-Family Development [TMK: (2) 3-9-002:14] and for the proposed Welakahao Single-Family Development TMK:(2)3-9-002:116, 150, _ 1511.SCS is seeking information on cultural soEnv-saaA resources and traditional cultural practices previously and currently conducted in the vicinity of these properties located in Kr-hei, All persons having information concerning Keokea Ahupua'a,Wailuku District,Maui unmarked Native Hawaiian burials present Island,Hawaii. Please respond within 30 within TMK:(3)7-7-008:121,a 11.4-acre days to Cathleen Dagher of SCS at(808) parcel in Kapala'alaea 2 Ahupua'a,North 597-1182.■ Kona District,Island of Hawai'i are hereby HAUN &ASSOCIATES 32 cd' 5-I2-1ft-0 LAURA It.THIELEN LUYDALINGLE - �E ��Myh; DUARDOFIAMAMMNATTE LRESOURCFS GOVERNOR OF HAWAII :• e%958 y 1' COAAMIONON WATER RESOURCEMANAOEMEM 9 RUSSELL Y.TSWI and _ FIRST DEPUTY KEN C.KAWAHAIIA ' OEPIlTYOCUS.TOSt•WATER i1 ,•- AQUATIC ..-. .. RFSNRC ES MATING ANDOCEAN EREATION ... . SLIREAUOF CONYANC ES COa°245R3NON WATERRESOIlACEMANAOEA@!T (X*ZER VATION AM)COASTAL LANDS STATE OF HAWAII CONSERVATR,NANDRESOURCES FMORCEMEM s � +� DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES IORESTRYAMA�N RAIDOIAWE°TAMIXESERVECO19MION STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION STATTEE PAW 601 KAMOKILA BOULEVARD,ROOM 555 KAPOLEI,HAWAII 96707 May 27,2010 Alan E.Haun,Ph.D. LOG NO:2010.0034 Haun&Associates DOC NO: 1005MD37 73-1168 Kahuna A'o Road Archaeology Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 Dear Dr. Haun: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review— Archaeological Data Recovery Plan for 25 Sites LapalWalaea 2°a Ahupua°a, North Kona District,Island of Hawaii TMK: (3)7-7-008:105,113,119& 121 This letter reviews the aforementioned plan(Haun and Henry January 2010;Archaeological Data Recovery Plan, Land of Kapalaalaea 2,North Kona District, Island of Hawaii[TMK 3-7-7-08:105, 113, 119, 121];H&A Report 476.4-032107),which we received on January 19,2010.We apologize for the delay in our reply. This plan is for the data recovery and analysis of 25 sites consisting of 16 permanent habitation sites, 7 temporary habitation sites,and two agricultural complexes. Hand excavation of 38.0 sq In at 11 sites and mechanical trenching to collect chronometric data from four agricultural features.AMS dating will be done for 12 carbon samples, and activity analysis of the cultural material previously collected during test excavation of 65.5 sq In at 46 features at the data recovery sites.A burial treatment plan is needed for the burial features which are not part of this plan. We find this plan acceptable and accept it as final pursuant to HAR §13-278. We look forward to reviewing the report and burial treatment plan. Upon receipt of this letter please submit one paper copy of your plan marked "Final" to our Kapolei office along with a CD containing a searchable pdf version of the final report and a copy of this approval letter,marked to the attention of the"Kapolei Library." If you have questions about this letter please contact Morgan Davis at (808) 896-0514 or via email to: mor gan.e.davis@hawaii.ov. Aloha, Nancy McMahon,Deputy SHPO/State Archaeologist and Historic Preservation Manager State Historic Preservation Division Cc:Analu K.Josephides, Cultural Historian,Hawaii Island Section Planning Depi. Exhibit 3 Report 476.4-032107 FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY PLAN LAND OF KAPALA'ALAEA 2 NORTH KONA DISTRICT ISLAND OF HAWAII (TMK 3-7-7-08:105, 113, 119, 121) By: Alan E. Haun,Ph.D. And Dave Henry,B.S. Prepared for: Kona Heights LLC 4221 W National Ave. Burbank,CA 91505 January 2010 Haun & Associates Archaeological,Cultural,and Historical Resource Management Services 73-1168 Kahuna A`o Road,Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 Phone:982-7755 Fax:325-1520 Report 476.4-032107 FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY PLAN LAND OF KAPALA'ALAEA 2 NORTH KONA DISTRICT ISLAND OF HAWAII (TM K 3-7-7-08:105, 113, 119, 121) Haun & Associates Archaeological,Cultural,and Historical Resource Management Services 73-1168 Kahuna A`o Road,Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 Phone:982-7755 Fax:325-1520 CONTENTS Introduction • 1 Site Identification • 5 Sites within TMK:3-7-7-08:121 • 5 Sites within TMK:3-7-7-08:105, 113 and 119 • 24 Research Questions and Methods •48 Research Questions • 48 Methodology • 57 References • 58 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Portion of 1996 Kealakekua Quadrangle Showing Project Area Parcels - 2 Figure 2. Location of Data Recovery Sites within TMK:3-7-7-8:121 • 3 Figure 3. Location of Data Recovery Sites within TMK:3-7-7-8:105, 113 and 119 4 Figure 4. Site 24838 Plan Map and TU-16 Southeast Face Profile • 6 Figure 5. Site 24839 Plan Map and TU-17 North Face Profile • 7 Figure 6. Site 24840 Plan Map and TU-6 Southwest Face Profile • 9 Figure 7. Site 24841 Plan Map and TU-7 North Face Profile • 10 Figure 8. Site 24843 Plan Map and TU-11 South Face Profile 11 Figure 9. Site 24844 Plan Map and Profiles of TUs 2,9 and 10 12 Figure 10. Site 24845 Plan Map and TU-I b East Face Profile • 14 Figure 11. Site 24846,Feature A Plan Map and TU-22 West Face Profile • 15 Figure 12. Site 24846,Feature B Plan Map and TU-3 East Face Profile 16 Figure 13. Site 24846,Feature C Plan Map and TU-19 East Face Profile 17 Figure 14. Site 24846,Feature D Plan Map and TU-4 Northwest Face Profile - 19 Figure 15. Site 24846,Feature E Plan Map and TU-5 South Face Profile • 20 Figure 16. Site 24846,Feature F Plan Map and TU-la South Face Profile - 21 Figure 17. Site 24846,Feature G Plan Map and TU-13 North Face Profile - 22 Figure 18. Site 24846,Plan Map of Features H and I and Profiles of TUs 20 and 21 23 Figure 19. Site 25735 Plan Map and TU-2 West Face Profile 25 Figure 20. Site 25737 Plan Map and TU-3 East Face Profile 27 Figure 21. Site 25738 Plan Map - 28 Figure 22. Site 25739 Plan Map and TU-6 East Face Profile 29 Figure 23. Site 25740 Plan Map and TU-7 Northeast Face Profile • 30 Figure 24. Site 25741 Plan Map and TU-8 North Face Profile • 32 Figure 25. Site 25743 Plan Map 33 Figure 26. Site 25744 Plan Map 34 Figure 27. Site 25745 Plan Map 35 Figure 28. Site 25746 Plan Map 37 Figure 29. Site 25747 Plan Map 38 Figure 30. Site 25748 Plan Map and TU-11 West Face Profile • 39 Figure 31. Site 25750 Plan Map • 42 Figure 32. Site 25752 Plan Map and TU-9 East Face Profile • 43 Figure 33. Site 25753 Plan Map • 45 TABLES Table 1. Proposed Data Recovery and Identification of Previous Testing • 50 INTRODUCTION This data recovery plan was prepared by Haun& Associates at the request of Kona Heights LLC. The objective of this plan is to mitigate impacts to 25 sites located within two parcels in the Land of Kapa- la`alaea 2,North Kona District, Island of Hawaii(TMK 3-7-7-08:105, 113, 119 and 121 —Figure 1). This plan is prepared in accordance with data recovery requirements of the Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-SHPD), as contained within Hawaii Administra- tive Rules,Title 13,DLNR,Subtitle 13,SHPD Rules,Chapter 278(DLNR 2003). The two separate parcels total 37.6-acres and consist of a seaward parcel (TMK 3-7-7-08:121 - 1 1.4-acres) and an inland parcel (TMK 3-7-7-08:105, 113, and 119—26.2-acres). The seaward parcel va- ries from 50 to 122 ft elevation and the inland parcel varies from 180 to 580 ft.The parcels are bordered by stone walls to the north and south,with undeveloped land situated to the west of each parcel. The seaward parcel is bordered by the proposed AIN Highway corridor to the east and the inland parcel is bordered by the Kuakini Highway to the east. Both parcels were inventoried by Haun & Associates. TMK 3-7-7-08:121 (Haun and Henry 2006a) was examined in 2005 and TMK 3-7-7-08:105, 113, and 119 (Haun and Henry 2006b) was sur- veyed in 2006. The latter parcel was also previously inventoried by Hammatt et al. (1987). Fourteen sites composed of 172 features were identified in the lower parcel (TMK 3-7-7-08:121; Haun and Henry 2006a —Figure 2). Seven sites are composed of a single feature and seven are composed of two to 142 features. Features consist of 120 modified outcrops, 15 mounds, 14 platforms, 8 enclosures, 5 terraces, 5 walls, 3 pavements, a lava blister and a walled platform. Functionally, the features were interpreted as agricultural (n=145), permanent habitation (16), permanent habitation/burial (1), ceremonial (4), temporary habitation (3),and livestock control(3). Twenty-eight sites composed of 1,321 features were documented in the upper parcel(TMK 3-7-7- 08:105, 113 and 119; Haun and Henry 2006b — Figure 3). Twenty are single feature sites and eight are composed of multiple features. Features consist of 1,019 modified outcrops, 216 mounds, 32 terraces, 16 enclosures, 9 platforms, 8 kua`iwi, 6 walls,4 lava blisters, 3 lava tubes,2 trails, 2 walled terraces, a filled crack, a foundation, a pavement and a U-shape. Functionally, the features were interpreted as agricultural (n=1,257),permanent habitation(46), livestock control(5),temporary habitation(4),burial/probable burial (4),transportation(2),storage(2)and historic habitation(1). A total of 42 sites and 1,493 features have been documented in both parcels. Two sites consist of historic ranch walls that form the north and south boundaries of the parcels(Sites 6366 and 6388). Feature types consist of 1,139 modified outcrops,231 mounds,37 terraces,24 enclosures,23 platforms, I 1 walls,8 kua`iwi, 5 lava blisters,4 pavements,3 lava tubes,2 trails,2 walled terraces and a walled platform,a foun- dation, a filled crack and a U-shape. Functionally, the features were interpreted as agricultural (n=1,402), permanent habitation (62), permanent habitation/burial (1), livestock control (8), temporary habitation (7), burial/probable burial(4),ceremonial(4),storage(2),transportation(2),and historic habitation(1). All forty-two sites in the parcels were assessed as significant for their information content. These sites have yielded information important for understanding prehistoric and historic land use in the project area.One site is also culturally significant as a place for probable ritual activity(Site 24534)and three sites were assessed as culturally significant because probable pre-contact burials are present(Sites 24842,25734 and 25742). 1 -2171000 - 1 14 o i- r HASM HON OKAA S' WAIMEA Fi�+h,akrn fklu- t . LONAt9iii151ATE HILO MUSTORlCALPARf{ 2i70000 +rPr{ -_ - - _ - - - -- -- - KAIWA 1 , Via`___ I rKEALAKEKUA P OA Lacaflon PAHALA F�I+n•r>Lr 6�ar AALEHU Park ' Park �" •x _._—._�------- _ ..__ 21690011 UA.- -Ji "� / �, •� �LVa3cI ro ect Arra 2168000 -Tack l •Y I�.C�'n� - lk:w.3�E�ttt haluli, J I h #aye. � !xk •:� �.` �CalaauoKalakaii „L - Y��ai �I �� � _•f } J 2I67000'— - - - - :Y J - _------ S r .l it S ;• •� - :� I II "2165000 � - .•:� ' -� Narkuua �m '�1 emmhou Hruufk,u�ry-+ r.Ran+.el fll '- naiaca p ]DQUm [ Kaukalaelae Pr: •y 4f�,, N189190000 191000 Figure 1.Portion of 1996 Kealakekua Quadrangle showing Project Area Parcels 2 120 Ito 100 0 80 90 A 0 EC 120 1.601 6 20 40 go- AT 1,Pnect Area OB Boundary AR AS C D, 70 9) AW AU AP AQ AY q OAO E—1 AX �AV 60 AZ.1 "Ba t AL G, �E OCT cu CR OCQ III) k 0 AK 24840 C10cp BE 6 68 1 9H nihm Dri�e 00 At so Co 'BG BF Bt� 0 cl� AH V OEF JE Ej CV 0 8,cD BN am BL?"K Alz C 24 0 ED -CN H CF A13 CW 0 c) 6 24841 �Cl. 0 0 R Ell cc rA . O.AG -AA Z CM K 0 CB�q 0 DO oBZ liq `-BV 4838 H _, ON' Y 13U EL El CX CY 0 0 DA 0 B)? Oas U EK 0 0 cz Do o CE T S q, 0 E ECD 1 0 24845 D8 DC DEo 0 RX 0 0 0 K BW BEla ODF 0 +4839 DR ' Do oEA 24844 Ds 00DQ Dk, -vu 0 Gz or 0 DK Dp DV ODU Dot,,DM DL 0 Project Arca Boundary 4141PI DN ODZ DWO Site Numbers prefixed by 50-10-37- bDy V--P Stone wag 'o DX oA=Agrimlamd Feature ol'She 24847 Contour interval=IN Figure 2.Location of Data Recovery Sites within TMK:3-7-7-8:121 KOakitri Highway 0 120 240 3608 t 0 40 90 120m 520 @ 560 320 t t t I t 280 48025750 t 1 t nriveway *y t 440 I t 1 24025748 tt 400 5747 t 25746 ' I 0 tt 360 � 200 25743 1xx An ET �YS,,..., ...... 2575A AT t ,75741 ] \ ttt 257404 M� , 75 t , ER tt � tit 25744 25745 o 25739' PX y�}25735 —_ �.rp•�Ar� � — project Area Boundary t A ® AEV ` St-Wall .5th' 25738' AT tt , Terrace tt 737 1 Contour Interval=40 fret .A- j t Site Numbers pref—d by SO.10-37- Fmture Inters=Agdcultursl Feature of Sita 25757 Agricultural Mounds and Modified Outcrops of3ite 25757 not depicted Figure 3.Location of Data Recovery Sites within TMK:3-7-7-8:105, 113 and 119 The mapping, written descriptions, photography, and test excavations at 13 sites adequately do- cumented them and no further work or preservation was recommended. Twenty-five sites were recom- mended for mitigation through data recovery.The three sites with burials were recommended for preserva- tion in accordance with a Burial Treatment Plan prepared for DLNR-SHPD and the Hawaii Island Burial Council(HIBC)review and approval.The ritual site was recommended for preservation in accordance with a Site Preservation Plan to be prepared for DLNR-SHPD review and approval. DLNR-SHPD concurred with these significance assessments and recommended treatments in letters to Dr. Alan Haun from Ms. Melanie Chinen dated November 21, 2006 (Parcel 121; Log No. 2006.3733, Doc. No. 0611MK24), and July 3,2007(Parcels 105& 113;Log No.2007.1804,Doc No:0706MK27). This plan is for the data recovery and analysis of 25 sites consisting of 16 permanent habitation sites, 7 temporary habitation sites and 2 agricultural complexes. The permanent habitation sites consist of six complexes(Sites 24844,24846,25735,25737,25748 and 25753),3 platforms(Sites 24840,24843 and 25745),2 enclosures(Sites 25746 and 25744),2 terraces(Sites 25739 and 25752),a modified outcrop(Site 25741),a pavement(Site 24845)and a walled terrace(Site 25750). The temporary habitation sites consist of 3 lava tubes (Sites 25738, 25746 and 25747), 2 platforms (Sites 24839 and 24841), a lava blister(Site 24838)and a terrace(Site 25740).The two agricultural complexes(Sites 24847 and 25757)contain 1,134 modified outcrops,228 mounds,20 terraces,8 kua`iwi, 5 enclosures,3 walls and a filled crack. This plan describes the data recovery sites,research questions and methodology to guide the data recovery effort,and specific data recovery strategies for each site. The distribution of the 25 data recovery sites is presented in Figures 2 and 3. The plan proposes hand-excavation of 38.0 sq m at eleven sites (24840, 24843, 24845, 24846, 25735, 25738,25743, 25744, 25748, 25750, 25753),mechanical trenching to collect chronometric data from four agricultural features (Sites 24847 and 25757), AMS dating of 12 carbon samples,and activity analysis of the cultural material previously collected during test excavation of 65.5 sq m at 46 features at the data recovery sites. SITE IDENTIFICATION Sites within TM 3-7-7-08:121 Site 24838 Site 24838 is a lava blister located on the crest of a small pahoehoe rise(Figure 4). Access is from a vertical entry 1.3 m above the floor on the west side of the blister. A shallow soil deposit and scattered roof fall debris overlie the blister floor. Plastic garden pots are located on the floor on the northwest side of the entrance, goat bones are scattered on the floor south of the entry,and a piece of waterworn coral is exposed on the floor northeast of the entry. Excavation of a 0.5 by 0.5 m test unit (TU-16)in the soil deposit on the south side of the blister entrance revealed a single deposit overlying bedrock(Hann and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of 6 to 8 cm of very dark brown silt with 10% gravel inclusions. Cultural remains consisted of Cypraea shell and charcoal. Site 24838 was inter- preted as a temporary habitation.The plastic pots indicate the blister has been recently utilized. Site 24839 Site 24839 is a paved oval platform partially constructed on top of a bedrock outcrop and par- tially on the ground surface (Figure 5). No cultural remains were observed on the platform surface. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit (TU-17) revealed an architectural layer (Layer I) overlying a soil deposit(Layer I I)on bedrock(Haan and Henry 2006a).Layer 1 consisted of 25 to 31 cm of loose- ly packed cobbles, pebbles and small boulders with no cultural remains. Layer li consisted of dark brown silt with 30% cobble and pebble inclusions. Cultural remains from Layer II consisted of Cy- praea shell fragments and a kukui nutshell.Site 24839 was interpreted as a temporary habitation struc- ture. 5 a 0 1.5 3.0 4.5ft Modem plastic pot, \\ -0 Datum / V (0.95) t� Vertical entrance (1.3 m deep) ! �y Waterworn coral cobble Goat bones /' / j (0.9) Goat bones TU-16 —Soil and scattered cobbles— (0.5) i (0.7) \� / Interior limits ol7blister ) / (0.95)-Height in meters \� \ Southeast Face 0 I l0LrtL__ Bedrock 0 50cm Layer 1-Very dark brown(7.5YR 2.513)silt with 10%gravel inclusions;Cultural remains present Figure 4. Site 24838 Plan Map and TU-16 Southeast Face Profile 6 0 1.5 3.0 4.511 0 OS 1.0 1.5m —I Ineven soil and outrnips— I // I I (0.35) TL'-17 Datum I - / /5 r/ 1 / / (0.3) i i ` t North Face ---Uneven soil and outcrops— (0.25) 0 I Il 1 /7 Edge of pahaehoe autcroP f'�� Bedrock 0 10Ocm (0.35)=Height in meters j Layer I-Loosely packed cobbles,pebbles and small � boulders;No cultural remains Layer Il-Dark brown(IOYR 3/3)At with 30%cobble and pebble inclusions;Cuhutal remains present Figure 5. Site 24839 Plan Map and TU-17 North Face Profile 7 Site 24844 Site 24840 is a paved rectangular platform. The Site 6366 historic boundary wall abuts the north side of the platform and was built from stones removed from the platform. An agricultural wall, Feature EJ of Site 24847,extends southwest from the southwestern corner of the platform. A bedrock outcrop forms part of the eastern side and boulder rubble is present at the northeast corner. A water- worn coral concentration is located in the platform's northwest corner and a rubble-filled oval depres- sion is located in the center of the southern portion of the platform. The depression is bordered by small boulders,a vertical slab is located on its east side,and a horizontal pahoehoe slab is located ad- jacent to its southeast side(Figure b). Excavation of a 1.5 m by 1.5 m test unit(TU-6)placed over the horizontal slab revealed an architectural layer(Layer I)overlying a soil deposit(Layer 11)on bedrock (Haun and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of 75 to 88 cm of loosely packed cobbles and small bould- ers and contained waterworn coral and a waterworn basalt pebble. Layer 11 consisted of 5 to 7 cm of very dark grayish brown silt containing 70% gravel, pebble and cobble inclusions. Cultural remains consisted of a volcanic glass core, Cypraea shells and waterworn coral pebbles. Site 24840 was inter- preted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. Site 24841 Site 24841 is a paved oval platform constructed adjacent to a bedrock outcrop on the east side and bordered by boulders on the north side and (Figure 7). The remaining sides consist of sloping cobble and small boulder rubble. No cultural remains were present on the surface. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit (TU-7) in the center of the platform revealed two layers over bedrock (Haun and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of 41 to 49 cm of tightly packed pebbles, cobbles and small boulders with a single waterworn basalt pebble. Layer II consisted of 4 to 10 cm of very dark grayish brown silt with 60% pebble and cobble inclusions. Cultural remains from Layer II consisted of Cypraea shells and charcoal.Site 24841 was interpreted as a temporary habitation structure. Site 24843 Site 24843 is a large paved oval platform(Figure 8). A remnant of a bi-faced wall is located along the southern side of the platform and an alignment of vertical slabs forms a portion of the north side. The remaining sides are collapsed. A Iinear alignment of basalt cobbles is located on top of the platform and three waterworn coral cobbles were noted on the platform surface. Excavation of a 1.3 by 1.0 m test unit(TU-11)on the platform surface revealed an architectural layer(Layer 1)overlying a soil deposit(Layer II)on bedrock(Haun and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of 27 to 30 cm of tightly packed cobbles and pebbles,and a waterworn branch coral fragment. Layer 11 was consisted of 7 to 18 cm of very dark brown silt with 30 % pebble and gravel inclusions. Cultural material from Layer 11 consisted of Cypraea shells, waterworn coral and basalt pebbles, kukui nutshells and charcoal. Site 24843 was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. Site 24844 Site 24844 consists of a rectangular enclosure (Feature A) and an adjoining rectangular plat- form(Feature B),encompassing an area 13.6 m long by 11.6 m wide (Figure 9). The enclosure floor is level soil with no cultural remains. An oval-shaped mound constructed of stacked cobbles and a vertical boulder is located in the center of the enclosure.Excavation of a 0.5 by 0.5 m test unit(TU-2) in the northwestern corner of the enclosure revealed a 7 to 28 cm layer of very dark brown silt with 25-35%gravel, pebble and cobble inclusions overlying bedrock. Cultural material from Layer I con- sisted of Cypraea shells,waterworn coral pebbles and charcoal. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit (TU-10) over the oval mound revealed the mound rocks (Layer 1) overlying a soil deposit (Layer II) on bedrock. Layer I varied in depth from 10 to 50 cm and contained no cultural material. Layer II con- sisted of 7 to 18 cm of very dark brown silt with 10%pebble inclusions. Cultural material recovered from Layer I I consisted of Cypraea and Nerita Picea shells, waterworn coral and basalt pebbles, and charcoal. 8 0 3.0 6.0 9.011 0 1.0 2.0 10m 1 Pile of cut trees and brush Sloping boulder rubble 0O flC � O o 0 Site 6366 Wall 000000000c _ - - O Q 0 0 O"a - - 1)00000000000C - - - - - - 0C- -._. ..- -000000000000000 "NO 00C- -- - - - 000000000000 o C = =. 0 0 0 o a o O ' , ., utero O0OUfl�©0O0Od0Od0Od0O0Od0Q0OID .. O O O O C) O O O o 0000 - , (1.3) )d°0°0°O°0°O°0 ° 0 0 0 0 00 ° 0000 )dddddddddddddddddddddd©dd( \ 3d 0d 0d 0d 0d 0d 0d 0d 0d 0d 0d 0d0p0 O0O0O0 0O 0O 0O 0O 0O 0O 0O 0O 0O 000 o Q o ° o O o 0 o Q o 0 0 0 �JO°O°o°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°^°^°'�°O°a " O O 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q O Nertical slab Q O O 'O°UO O°0 O°O O°Q O°O O°a O°a 0°0r0()0 n 0 O O O O° O°O O ° W aterwO G . om —'' coral 011°O°O°O°a°O°a°O°O° d0 d° Od0{ O O O O O a O O O O 0 O O 0.95) concentration 'D O O O O 0 O O fl O () Q o Q °°°O°O°Q°0°0°O°00 °OTU-6 )O fl°O O O O O Q O O O O a O O O C {0.4 O O O O fl O O O C O O fl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a O O O ) ) O O O O a O O O a C ) ? O O O O O O a O O O O ))) )))) 00000000 1 0 O O (1 ) ))�j O �O000O°000 O le C? �d0( Qr d OOOflflflC)\ ) )) ti O d 0 d o Rubble filled depression0 O(lat slab O°0°O°O° ) {0.45 m deep) U 00000000000000000000000Q��� Datum °0°0°000°O°O°O°O°O°C�J JJ O O O Q 0 0 O O O OJ �J� J✓ (0.9) O°O°O°O°O°O°O°0°O° JJ��J� �0 O 0 O O O O 0 �JJJ �)00000000000C 0 ✓✓J ✓ odQ°Qdad°< n � J Smdhwcsfface 0 Q a O 0 0 °O°fl i� (0.5) (0.45)l ((J(((( )) Site 24847,Feature EJ wall CCCs )�) (0.5)a Height in meters 100cai (C`C C C) r Bedrock ((C (C)) )) 1 Slope direction 0 t00 I60cm (t((( ( )) ))) C ( (C j)j ) )) collapse Layer i-Lamely packed cobbles and boulders; C((C(C())) ) ) Cultural remains present (( C C( ) ) Faced side Layer tl-Very dale payish brown(IOYR 312)silt with 70%gravel and cobble inclusions: )J�) Cultural remains preeoi ))) f Rough cobble andOCCboulder pavement p:,-)Ol c oa Figure 6.Site 24840 Plan Map and TU-6 Southwest Face Profile 9 0 1.5 3.0 4.5 ft —Uneven soil and outcrops 0 0.5 1.0 1.5m (0.65) (0.55) (0.3) -- C7 TU-7 0 -0 0 0 C)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , – 0 0 0 0 Ono no 0 Ono 0 C;Z- 0 0 0 0 0 n n 0 �o 0.5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 (�) )_O_O_O_O�O 01 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . ( 1) 0 0 0o0 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 �X-11c) 0 0 () 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 O�r? 0 0 0 0 0 00 0' 0 0 0 0 )0 0 0 O&A 0 0 0 0 °( ( 000000000000 \, k, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0.25)��-� --�-)00000000000 )000000000000< 00C)OOOOC/xx /(f 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) (-) 0 4. ) ()0()0 0 0 0 0 () , () () 0 () < 0() () 0 C�oo 0 0 0 0 OQOUO 0000000< U 000000, 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 cc) 0 0 0 oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 -C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o 0000000 0 0 < 000 0 0 C', 0 00 0000000000 ( 0 Ono0 -0-0-0-0-0"0 0 U, -in-ono 0 0 QL 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 ou- orl 0 OO_ ' 00)ID' OCI 0 0 J JJ T/ —Uneven soil and outcrops (0A) Datum North Face Edge of pabachoe outcrop 0 Cobble pavement II 60cm Bedrock 0 100cm (0.3)=Height in meters Layer I-Tightly packed cobbles and small Slope dstectian boulders;Cultural remains present Layer 11-Very dark grayish brown(I OYR 3/2) silt with 60%pebble and cobble inclusions;Cultural remains present Figure 7. Site 24841 Plan Map and TU-7 North Face Profile 10 '''�,� Edge dpatmenoc mncrop 4;� St pingmbW South Face Em o Uncm-it and unpn— Stps dimen Cobble psunera (03)-Might inmman 60— _f_ 1F3 • we—.coat 0 100 140— Layer 1•Tightly Nc'ked cobbles and pebbles; a ^'•``�'�-� (0.4) Cuhuml remains Present Lay.It.very dark bmnn(7.5YR 2.52) 6 0^ �" 1 ailt with 30-Apehible and gmvd Fin O inclusions:Cuttuml rernains (0.3> `�!"o°o°o°o°o°o t verticalslabs mll ( %-�ooaoo°o°00000 0 p �J o 0 },}}}}' a 00000000000000 p 0 0 0 4 0 } umwn 020- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 'a 0 (ass) 0 0 0 00°O oaoaooaa000aooJ N.3) o a o 0 00 0 —` o ) o°o a °o° o�O000000.0.0.0)o )]✓JJ ,.,,.,... 0°0° °o°a o aoao 0O° s ��OOaO{,c li dmhbla rr JOOUOOOoc"Oo°o 0°0°°° °° a c, 0 0 o a �°0-0oa°O0.00°°0.la0Oo00oO0.a�00°°0OooO00°0 0 0°00 J°0o°o°o°o°o°o O°O°oo o°cc JcUJ0o,�'»JFJ J c. J)JJJj)J'J J>+J 1J'JJ-JJ�Y JJ)JJ)rJj(JJo.JgJ3!JJ JJ 00a0 0 0 O O 0000000o 0o000000 oo00 0 0 0 0, ` OuO O O O ° °o° °Jo°0°°0°°0°°0°°000 ° ° °° °l'o° °° o0 oo° ° �°° ° O0OOoOooO000 ° 0O0O 00000 )OaJJ7 J JjJJJ,JJ.�I JJJjJJJJ;JJJJJJJJJ J))) ) ) ' CCCtC �o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JJ)JJ� o C. CC o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0-(0..2,5) (as"s) a°r"�or,,✓�✓JJ JJ C' CC CCO°O°°°O°O°a°O°O°O°O°O°O°o°a°O ✓ Ji CCL<LLt;LLLLLSLQ`�C,L.L.�sLC;"LIL.�.�CL-LL,L�(.Ll�LLO\°.L�oLL O°°LO�c-yOCO Ov�0 O�0O O°�o0O �0✓O° °O°✓D�O°�0�O.�°"�°"'0y'nJjY`- (0.5) O � Q J�J :✓ ! � 2 0' °co,00°oao 0 O O O 0 OO Wall restraint ,� .�..`�✓`:� L~��L�t�t�..4�y�.s.�`�....`fw.✓icy `y`y..j� ....w.✓ .l'-' 10.331 (C� LL tip. ��"y u✓ ��-f.��.T' CCF:,+-LL`-`-w�v�� ✓-'.J 0 3.0 6.0 4Afl —Uneven wit and wtmups - �CLti LL4� ��W`t;y`U-'�.�✓` 0 1.0 2.0 3.0m (I.1) Figure 8.Site 24843 Plan Map and TU-11 South Face Profile 0 4.5 9.0 13.511 �}) Collapse (0.5)rr ) 0 1.5 3.0 4.5m �r•r ��.^ ��^ ,(0.4) (0.3) Ileight in meters 1 CC C,( (r,r Feature B (0.4) � TU-9— jC f rte �(0.5) Level soil with scattered stones r�C C 1 r Cr(r Cr (rr C ' rrrr r rrr r c i _ rr r (0.3) <C t C << � (• CCC<CC.LL L Datum - TU-2 TU-10 (0.35) �<C C (035) (0.5) Vertiealboulder QkQ t- CCC CC C(CC (0.5) Vertical boulder Feature A C C CCC (0.5) C C �r � (U.5) Vertical boulders T (0'4) (0.e) (0.35) Let et soil with scattered stones _ r (0.4) TU-2 ru-9 TU-10 North Face North Face North Face 0 i0 0 u it eea,oat 140cm 30cm Iredmck b0en 11 U loosen 0 50con 7 F/.-z Layer 1-Scuttrrett swhbles rtnrn motmd; Layer t•Y dark brown 7.5YR 2.512 sill with 100an y cry ( ) � .-_--__. ._--__ ..�� No culturalrt>aairn 25.35%cobble and pebble inclusions; Layer 1-Loosely packed cobbles and mal] Cultural remains}resent boulders;Cultural remains taesceu Layer 11•Very dark brown(?.SYR 252)silt with I W.cobble and pebble inclusions; Layer II-Very dark brown(7-5YR 2.512)silt with Cultural remains present 10-15%cobble and pebble inclusions; Cultural remains present Figure 9. Site 24844 Plan Map and Profiles of'TUs 2,9 and 10 12 The largely collapsed paved platform abuts the north side of the enclosure. It is rectangular in shape and is 6.4 m long and 4.8 to 6.2 m wide. No cultural remains were observed on the platform surface. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit(TU-4) revealed an architectural layer(Layer I)overly- ing a soil deposit(Layer II)on bedrock(Hann and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of 32 to 38 cm of loosely packed cobbles and small boulders containing 31 waterworn coral pebbles and one kukui nut- shell. Bedrock underlies Layer I throughout most of the unit,but a pocket of the Layer 11 soil extended through the center of the excavation. Layer 11 varied in depth from 42 to 46 cm and consisted of very dark brown silt with 10-15% pebble and cobble inclusions. Associated cultural material consisted of Cypraea shells,kukui nutshells and charcoal.Site 24844 was interpreted as a permanent habitation site, with the platform likely used as the foundation for a roofed structure and the enclosure used as an as- sociated yard. Site 24845 Site 24845 is an irregularly-shaped pavement bordered on the southeast side by a low wall (Figure 10).No associated cultural material was noted. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit(TU-1 b) revealed a stone layer (Layer 1) overlying a soil deposit (Layer 11) on bedrock (Hann and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of 17 to 25 cm of cobbles and pebbles that contained a basalt hammerstone. Layer II consisted of 23 to 32 cm of very dark brown silt with 30-40% cobble and pebble inclusions that contained a volcanic glass flake, a Cypraea shell, a waterworn coral pebble, a kukui nutshell and charcoal. Site 24845 was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. Site 24846 Site 24846 consists of a pavement(Feature A),two terraces(Features B and 1),four platforms (Features C, E, F and H), and two enclosures (Features D and G) constructed in an area 58.0 m long (north-south) by 37.0 m wide (See Figure 2). Feature A is an irregularly-shaped pavement (Figure 11). The surface is roughly paved with cobbles and boulders but a small area of well-sorted cobbles and pebbles is located in its center. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit (TU-22) in the well-sorted pavement revealed an architectural layer (Layer 1) overlying a soil deposit (Layer II) over bedrock (Hann and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of 7 to 11 cm of cobbles and pebbles and one waterworn coral pebble. Layer II consisted of 23 to 25 cm of very dark brown silt with 40%gravel and pebble inclusions, waterworn marine shells, a waterworn fire-cracked basalt cobble and waterworn coral. Feature A was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. Feature B is a rectangular terrace located east of Feature A that is 8.7 m in length and 2.6 to 5.2 m wide (Figure 12). The western side of the feature abuts a bedrock outcrop and the north side borders level soil. Low retaining walls extend along the east and south sides with the south wall com- prised of a single course alignment that varies in height from 0.3 to 0.45 m. The east retaining wall is aligned cobbles and boulders,vertical slabs and piled stones that range in height from 0.1 m to 0.65 m. The surface of the terrace consists of a level cobble and pebble pavement with a flat slab located adja- cent to the southern end of the aligned vertical slabs. A concentration of waterworn coral pebbles is located at the south end of the terrace. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit (TU-3) into the terrace surface revealed an architectural layer(Layer 1) overlying a soil deposit(Layer I1)on bedrock (Haun and Henry 2006a). Layer I consists of 17 to 26 cm of cobbles and small boulders with waterworn ma- rine shells and waterworn coral pebbles.Layer II consisted of 24 to 30 cm of very dark brown silt with 40-50% gravel and pebble inclusions and waterworn marine shell fragments, waterworn coral and kukui nutshells. Feature B was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. Feature C is a rectangular paved platform bordered on the northwest by a pahoehoe outcrop within the remaining sides formed by stacked and piled cobble and boulders(Figure 13).Two vertical slabs are incorporated into the southern side and three flat slabs form a portion of the north side. The remaining sides are level with the surrounding ground surface.A low wall is located in the north- 13 0 3.0 6.0 9.OR (0.0) I 0 1 A 2A 3.Om ,°o O a O C -Uneven soil and low outcrops- o°0°0°0° X00 00000 O°O°O°O°O°G J°O°O°O°O°o°O a O O O O a O p O°0°0°O°O°O°O°� ,00° 0° 0° 0° 0° 000°0G (a 1) 000000000 000 ° 0 ° 000006 O. t`}0000000000pp000000000000000 000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ` 000o0o0a0o0o00Oo0ooaaooa °00000000000000 Jo° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° 0 0ooooooooooooo o a o0000ooaaoa0o00000000000o0 ( ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °oaoaaooa000aO000- - 1 0 0„ _� 0a00000000000oo00o0C.1 0 0 ° o © 00o 000000 0000 0 0 00000 0. 0000°° 00°0000 ° 0 °0°0°00000 °0°0°°°0°0°0°0°0°0°°°0°0°0°0°0°°° 0O0000000 ° Oo0a0C 30 o0 a0 o0 00 o0 0 0 0 o 00 00 0o 0a 0o 0c01)°o 00000000000000Oo0000000000 ° 0.7) 00 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 o r 0 )0 o a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000 00000 00000000 C' )00000°0°0°00C 00000 0000000 "30000°0°0000C 00 00 0000000 1000°000 0 00 O O 0 a0r 1°0000°°0000 °0°0°�0(0.2<) Datum o0000 00O 0000000 (0.1)0 00°00000 0 b 0 000000 (0.3) �00,000o agar . 0006 TU-1 0.3) Uneven -Uneven soil and low outcrops- East race 0 1 II 60cBedrock rn 0 IOOcm o 0 0 Level cobble and pebble pavement 0°0°0 Layer I-Tightly packed cobbles and pebbles; Cultural remains present (03)=Iieight in meters Layer IT-Very dark brown(7.5YR 2.512)silt with 3040%cobble and pebble inclusions; Cultural remains present Figure 10.Site 24845 Plan Map and TU-lb East Face Profile 14 popop WOI.,CW,tbbh:=dpcbbl.pm.1 ,0 0 C 0 '__,0 0 00 0000 O O00,0�0,0 (0,7)•Ncig61 in mans —Level soil id mmr — 0 0(-)0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 L j —Level roil Id miumM1—I 00000000000 (0.0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> C> o C> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000008,0 0 0 0 0 0 mo—E) 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0Q0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 00 0 0 0 0 0 '0000 .0, .? 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0'0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 .'0 0 0 7��O 20202"�O�O 0, 0 0 0 " 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .,.,0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d.).0 C.,.0,., .0 90.0.9- -9-9. 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 " ") 0 0 0 0 C) 0 20-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00,0 °°°°°° 0 �'O.'0,5 C 0 0 0 0 I-) C) 0 0 0 0 0 00 ()0,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 �O 0 0 0 0 "0 0 0 0 Q 000,0 0 - U 0 0 0 0 0 0 000,0,000,000��) 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 "Po�"000"Ooo" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r) 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 U W.tF— 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40— Z� (ms) 0 0 C, I" -1 0 0 0 00— 0 0 00 Lq�I-Tightly Packed nibbles-d pbbl.; Piled..bbl...d..Wlbld- 1 (0.5) Cultural mmaimpmmt Durum Layer ll.Very dark brown(7,5YR 2.512)Hilt with 0 3.0 6.0 9.01k 40%gl.dWbbl,i.d.l; C.1—dtam impresent 0 1.0 2.0 3.01n Figure 11.Site 24846,Feature A Plan Map and TU-22 West Face Profile ^J Site 24847,Feature EK Enclosure Wall ^r.^ , ,- r, �.�,^ ,'�."'^ i^ r`�, r..� l; u J'J ✓..]J J J J J�.J l J�J.✓✓J ,J1J 0 / !'•/"!" �^r.,i.C, /• /"` r` ��. �J .i._/ J J J J / �.%J JJ�J.�.....✓J`�J J J J J� i��JJ,.J,J•�':i �� x(0.1) v00<} -Aligned cobbles and Small tKwlJcsn lOUQ,aOQ(�)aoQQ?000°°0 ), 0 l— °a°o°oa° C x (0.3} t 0 3.0 6.0 4.On 0 0 0 0 0o0a0OCO 3 .Om 0 0 1.0 2.0 OOa0 a0Q0Q0Q0a°Q / 000 ° 0 ° ° ° ° ° ° ° 00 00 00 0000 00 0000Oo ' VertiralsUn 0O000 . 0 a 0 4OQO0Q0 0 � � Flarslab 000 0000 ° ° ° ° ° O0OOOa 0Q0�0OO( 4n0 --OutcropO° ° ° ° ° 0 OOO000U ° ° ° ° ° ° ° O0a0000 ". 000oUooaooC>o{ (a.3)0 aoC ° () Q a a a 0UaaU0 0000 ° ° ° ° 000000000 UncscnsoiI andoutetops- 000c�0{ 0V0J°00 )°t U 0 U° `° -00000000o00o00000G` � 00 0 0 ¢ 0 0 00 0 0 0 a 0 a O 0 0 0 0 O°{ t(1 Datum o o a a 00000O° ° ° ° ° ° OOOOOO 0000o O 00 00 0 O O 000 ° 00 0 00 `0 0 0 0Qo00a0 000 U O° aUQ ) 000 1 ar Aligmxl subbky Coral cownion (045) and small booklets f Last Face 0 - `— O° Cubble and pcbblu pawrasa Bedrock OQU�O 60cm 0 10O® ......... Edgc ufuu" Layer 1-Ti&v packed cobbles,pebbles and small €I boulders;Cultural remains present t (0.7)=1lcight in meters Layer 11-Very dark brown(7.5YR 2.512)silt with 40.50% gravel and pebble inclusions;Cultural trmuim;ptesaa Figure 12.Site 24846,Feature B Plan Map and TU-3 East Face Profile 16 000 10-000 Cobble and pebble pavemsetat -,00-,00 II Level soil and omms .......... .......... Edge of-mp 0 3.0 6.0 9.08 0 2.0 3.0m (0.3)-Height in meters 01 C) Flat slabs '000o D00000 0 0 o"', 0,0 0(0,0 0,0 0 '0" '0'0, 0 060608080'0 0 U� -000 00;0.-, 0 0 0 'o, 0,0 '00000000000 0.. oogo2000�oogg. gog.'g.,, Og0000000000 0 00 0,(0.2) 000000000 OC 0 0 00.0.00gog0000go�00�00� .'o'o'o'o'o90000000000000Dgo -00., '0000 000 oogoogg2ogo.-O.�O.O.'o 0'0'0,000, 00000 000 (0.4) 0 0 C,000000000,0((0.4) 0 00000000-c...O ,'O.'O'.020,0,000000,020000000g000 0 0 000�o go�00000000 000000000000000..0., 0'9'000go 00000go.—)00000 "C'..-.',-,'.00.,O,O, 0 0 0 00 0000C,000('00000000000000000 0 0 000.0 000000000000000000000000 0 -0�00900 0 0 0 0 0 0 000O.Og 0 0 0 0 0 0 0"05000000000000000000gog 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 ggggoo , ) 0 0 0 ogogogoto�00000000go�goo� 000,000 o o o o o o 000 0 0 0 C> 0000000go '0�00�,O(�,O000000c00000 00" 00000,0000000 (000,000000V 0 0 000000000000C '000'-9-9-'og.g.g.gogogo 0000gogogogogogoo .00'. 00-00"-O.-,.o go.00.0.ogogc. .00 '000000, 00000 �5 (01s) . . . 0 000r 00000C, 0', 00000 '-'000'-'.0900,0..O,g'o�000-00000O.-Oo. 0-'O'.o 0 G o . Dw— '0,00'.0go"0000000000000 9Z0,09 0 East fi- '0000g0000gog0000g000000 �o 0,0 00000 0 0 0,0 (0.35) 00 9-909-9090,.-Coo, 0 '00,00,00,00oo ,0'000 0 0 0 0 0 0 oo?'. (O-SI TU-19 IT (0.6) 60s. Herknek (0.45) Vertical slabs 0 loom Leelsailand.wesvpq— LoYe,I-Tightly pad d bbl,,and pebbles; Cullueell retttaite;prasettt layer 11-Very dark brown(7.5YR 2.5(3)silt with 20%.9—cland eobbleb,clusi Cultural remains present Figure 13.Site 24846,Feature C Plan Map and TU-19 East Face Profile central portion of the platform.Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit(TU-19)revealed an architectur- al layer(Layer I)over a soil deposit(Layer II)on bedrock(Hann and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of cobbles and pebbles and one waterworn coral pebble to a depth of 25 to 33 cm. Layer II consisted of 13 to 20 cm of very dark brown silt with 20%gravel and cobble inclusions. Cultural remains con- sisted of a basalt adze flake, a coral abrader, marine shells, urchin fragments, waterworn coral and basalt pebbles, a pig tooth and charcoal. Feature C was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. Feature D is a C-shaped enclosure located within the Feature EL enclosure of the Site 24847 complex.The enclosure is open to the west(Figure 14).The interior floor is level soil capped by scat- tered cobbles, with an exposed pahoehoe outcrop present in the eastern portion of the enclosure. Ex- cavation of a 0.5 by 0.5 m test unit(TU4) inside the enclosure revealed a 10 to 16 cm layer of very dark brown silt with 25% gravel inclusions over bedrock (Hann and Henry 2006a). Cultural remains consisted of Cypraea,Nerita picea and waterworn marine shells, waterworn coral pebbles, and char- coal.Feature D was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. Feature E is a paved oval platform constructed adjacent to the southwest side of a bedrock outcrop(Figure IS).The northeast and west side of the feature is bordered by aligned small boulders. The southern side has collapsed.A horizontal pahoehoe slab is present at the north end of the platform surface. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit(TU-5)revealed an architectural layer(Layer I)overly- ing a soil layer(Layer II) on bedrock (Haun and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of 19 to 38 cm of cobbles and pebbles with no cultural remains. Bedrock was encountered below Layer I in the east half of the unit, while Layer II was encountered beneath Layer It in the west half. Layer II consisted of 2 to 5 cm of black silt with 30%cobble and pebble inclusions and a volcanic glass flake,Drupa ricin, Nerita picea and waterworn marine shells,waterworn coral pebbles,a mongoose skull,kukui nutshells and charcoal.Feature E was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. Feature F is a paved rectangular walled platform south of a gap in the Site 6366 wall and the southern end ofNaniloa Drive(Figure 16). Wall remnants extend along the east,west and south sides. The northern end is level with the surrounding ground surface. Excavation of a 2.0 by 2.0 m test unit (TU-la)revealed two layers over bedrock(Haun and Henry(2006a).Layer I consisted of 37 to 48 cm of cobbles and pebbles, basalt groundstone fragments,a fragment of a basalt adze and Cypraea shell. Layer II consisted of 36 to 47 cm of very dark grayish brown silt with 30%gravel and cobble inclu- sions, basalt and volcanic glass flakes, Cypraea, Nerita picea, Isognomon perna and waterworn ma- rine shells, urchin spines and exoskeleton fragments, pig bones,kukui nutshells and charcoal. Feature F was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. Feature G is an oval enclosure (Figure 17). Excavation of a 0.5 by 0.5 m test unit(TU-13) inside the enclosure revealed a soil deposit overlying bedrock to a depth of 29 to 40 cm (Haun and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of very dark brown silt with 30%gravel inclusions,Cypraea, Drupa rubusidaeus and waterworn marine shell fragments, urchin exoskeleton fragments and charcoal. Fea- ture G was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. Feature H is a rectangular paved platform located within the Feature EK enclosure at Site 24847 (Figure 18). A linear pile of cobbles and small boulders extends to the east from the northeast corner of the platform. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit(TU-20) revealed three layers over be- drock(Haun and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of 22 to 44 cm of cobbles and small boulders,a wa- terworn coral cobble,Cypraea and waterworn marine shells. Layer II consisted of 37 to 56 cm of very dark brown silt with 25-35% cobble and pebble inclusions, two coral abraders, marine shells, urchin fragments, waterworn coral pebbles, small mammal bones, kukui nutshells and charcoal. Layer III consisted of 2 to 4 cm of dark brown silt with 20-30% gravel inclusions, waterworn marine shell fragments, urchin fragments,two waterworn coral pebbles and charcoal. Feature H was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. 18 z"', Edge of paboehoe outcrop (0.3)=Height in meters (0.3) (0.4) (0.2) Vertical slabs (0.35) i —Soil with scattcrod cobbles TU-4_0 (0.2) ' (0.45) i. (0.2) (0.4) (0.35) Datum Nortbwest Face 0 3.0 6.0 9.011 0 I 0 1.0 2.0 3.0m 120cmBedrock 0 Soon Layer I-Very dark brown(?_SYR 2.513)silt with 23%gravel inclusions;Cultural remains present Figure 14. Site 24846,Feature D Plan Map and TU-4 Northwest Face Profile 19 01.5 .0 4.5fk 0 ,. _OMAN" 0 0.5 1.0 1.5m (0.3) Flat am z Dat/ urn Aligned small boutdom 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0-3) 0°0°0°0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 () - ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0'Or'NO'O'00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0.35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0°0°O°O°O 0°0°O°O °O 0 0 0 0 0 Aligned small houldcm d0 00 00 O0 0a 0 0 0 OO OO 0 0 OO 0O 0 ad 0 0 00 00 o0 0 0 0 d0 o0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 (0-9) >000000000000 0000000 0 >0 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 �C_�c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-0-0—o 0 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 TU-5 (as) 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 Fucvd.,idc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0,75) G 0 0 0 (0.45) Unc%va soft and.outcrops Collapse South race (0.6) 1 Edge of pahoehoe ouwwp �MBICWdro-ck II U 60cm 0 100cm C Cobble pavement Layer 1-Tigyhtly packed cobbles and pebbles. (0.3)-Height in meten; No cultural remains Layer 11-Black(IOYR 2JI)sflt with 30%cobble Slope direction and pebble inclusions;Cultural remains present Figure 15.Site 24846,Feature F.Plan Map and TU-5 South Face Profile 20 Naniloa Drive Site 6366 Wall 0 3.0 6.0 9.0111 1.0 2-0 3.Orn (0.0) r )OuO-O I (0.25 r:)000000'000 0 ((0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �Qo (000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 Q c r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr ZO 0 0 0 0 0 0 (00000000 0 0 0 0c),W(V( -)0 0 0 0 0 00, )0000000°0o-00000({( )0 000 0'), 0 0 0 0 �. U'O (0.55) 0 000 o-'0oT0000( ( ),0-0- 0 ) 0 0 0 00000- ,( M 0 0 0C 000 o0o0o0o'(0.3)c 90000 0 0 0 0000000000C 035) 10- 0000000000 C C0000000000C Vertical slab (0.15) 00000 0 C (0-45) )N'O-O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C )'VO,)OO 000 0 0 0 T 00C 00 0000 Datum 0 0 4'- 0 C 10 000-0, )0 0 0 0 OU0 0 "0 0 00 00r 0.85) 01(05)010 r (0.55) r r (03) Hast Wall ofstructurt (0.3) South Fats; FO I Collapse Cobble pavement 00000 � 0000 I lWcm L2:=11=cdn,,* ---------too Main Faced side tAya 1-Tightly pwlcd wWcs and!pcbblcz;CuhuW ransinspwart: Luycr H-A'cry dark grayish brown(10YR 3f2)sift with M Vwd (0-3)-ileigbtinmeters and cubblu inulusions;Cultural nmutins pmsaid Figure 16.Site 24846,Feature F Plan Map and TU-la South Face Profile 21 t (0.5)slope direction (0.5)=Height m, masers — (0.65) (0.g) (0.35) I ` CC CCCC((tC —Level soil withscattered cobbles (C C( (Ct(( (( (c <( (0.4) (0.4) ( C ( ( C 4 C CC («`� � TU-l3 ((� (0.35) (0.3) — i (0.35) (0.55) I Aligned small boulders (0.7) (0.6) Damm North Face 0 -- *�r 1 I 0 15 3.0 450 40cm �,, k 0 OS 1.0 15m 0 50® Layer 1-Very dart brown(7.5YR 2 513)sill with 309E gravel mctmiorm Cu[naal rrrnnmu present Figure 17. Site 24846,Feature G Plan Map and TU-13 North Face Profile 22 000�C (0.1) (0.5) p°p o Cobble Pavement O O {0.35) 00000000 (0.3)®Height in metes 00000000 (015) 000°O°O J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --Level soil with scattered cobbles— v O O O O 000000U0000 0 3.0 6.0 9.Otl O O O O O 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 0000000000 (0.2) 00°00000000 0 00 0 0 0 O nl.20 Feature ll M-20-North Face 0°0000 O 0000 0 I 00000000 O Watcrwom ba-At cobble (0.2) II 80un III 24847,FeatureFK Enclosure Wall Bedrock ., IOQm (0.3) Piled mound r� Layer I-Tightly paekod cubbla,pebblm gad small boulders;Cultural tmrai;a prarnt r p 0.3) Laver 11-Very dark brown(7.M 2.52)silt with 0 0 0 25-30%cobble and pebble inclusions; 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 01 Cultural terrains t. , Fcalurc I (0.4) ,0000000000, Layer ll-Dark brown(7.5YR3/3)ailtwith O 0 O O 0 2O.30Ye gru cl inclusiuc, 000°00000° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U Of—{O,Q} Cultural remains PrQan O 0 O O 0000000000. 000 010 C Aligned cobbles 0 0 r p 0 T J-21-South Face 0000000000 (03 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0000000000 U ,00 O 00 O 00 O 00 U 00 0000000000 sed cobbles —Level soil with scattered cobbles ---:)O O°O°O°O° II O O 0 O O 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°p�,Vertical slab I 13ehrxjc j0000000O0OpYY {O.i) tlQxn 100un (0.0) 000000000000, 0 TU-21 �v 0,0°°°O°000°C}0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0000U 0 000 0000000000 �O°0000 0 O 000000000000C(0.0) Lo I-Tidn1y 1 �cobbles lbk swOanall i, 0O 0O0O 0 0 0 OO°O 0 0 oO0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O O O bouldm;Cultural remarts poem 0 000000000000000000 0 0 n O O Layer 11-Very dark brown(73YR 232)ult with (0.3) (0 6) 10.2044 cobble and pebble inchazium; (0.69)Ver'Cal slab Culturalrcnainspl—, Figure 18. Site 24846,Plan Map of Features H and I and Profiles of TUs 20 and 21 23 Feature I is a large, paved L-shaped terrace(see Figure 18).Aligned cobbles border the east side of the feature,with a second alignment extending across the surface of the terrace in an east-west orientation. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit(TU-21) revealed two layers over bedrock (Hann and Henry 2006a). Layer I consisted of 44 to 48 cm of cobbles, pebbles and small boulders with wa- terworn coral pebbles. Layer II consisted of 16 to 26 cm of very dark brown silt with 10-20%cobble and pebble inclusions and a volcanic glass flake, a coral abrader, marine shell fragments, urchin frag- ments and charcoal. Feature I was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation structure. Site 24847 Site 24847 is a complex of 142 agricultural features scattered throughout the project area(see Figure 2). The features consist of 119 modified outcrops, 14 mounds, five enclosures, two walls, one platform and one terrace. The 119 modified outcrops and 14 mounds are interpreted as clearing piles created by consolidating surface stones from adjacent planting areas. Typically these features are comprised of informally constructed piles of basalt cobbles and small boulders,with uneven sides and surfaces and no cultural remains.One modified outcrops(Feature CU)was tested by Haun and Henry (2006a)revealing no cultural remains. The five enclosures of Site 24847(Features EH through EL)are crudely built and were likely used to delineate the boundaries of garden plots. Of the five enclosures, four are irregularly-shaped and one is rectangular(Feature EI).Two walls at Site 24847(Features BD and CW)are linear features probably delineated garden plot boundaries. No cultural remains were found in association with either wall. An oval platform (Feature CE) was partially investigated by excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit (TU-8), which revealed an architectural layer constructed on bedrock (Haan and Henry 2006a). No cultural remains were recovered.The terrace at Site 24847(Feature AB)is a large unpaved feature. Excavation of a 1.5 by 1.0 m test unit(TU-15)revealed two layers overlying bedrock(Haan and Hen- ry 2006a). No cultural remains were present in either deposit. The informal construction of Feature AB and CE and the absence of cultural remains suggested that these features were used for agriculture. Sites within TMK 3-7 7-08:105, 113, 119 Site 25735 Site 25735 consists of an enclosure (Feature A) and a terrace (Feature B) constructed in an area 30.0 m long by 15.0 m wide(Figure 19).The enclosure is built on a low bedrock outcrop.A level soil deposit and an exposed bedrock outcrop form the enclosure floor. Cypraea shell and waterworn coral are scattered inside the enclosure. A coral abrader and a basalt adze fragment were collected from the surface of the site by Hammatt et al. (1987). Three open lava blisters are present on the sur- face of the western wall of the enclosure. The floors of the blisters are bare lava and no cultural re- mains were present. Excavation of a 1.0 by 0.5 m test trench in the enclosure revealed two layers over- lying bedrock. Stratum I consisted of 5 to 7 cm of very dark grayish brown silt loam containing ma- rine shells, coral fragments and charcoal. Stratum 11 consisted of 15 to 20 cm of black silt loam con- taining volcanic glass flakes, marine shells, urchin, and kukui nutshells. The exact location of the trench and the stratigraphic profile were not included in the Hammatt et al. report. The irregularly- shaped paved terrace was tested by Haun and Henry (2006b). Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit (TU-2) revealed two layers overlying bedrock. Layer I consisted of 20 to 29 cm of pebbles, cobbles and boulders, but no cultural remains. Layer II consisted of 4 to 36 cm of dark brown silt with 12% pebble and cobble inclusions,kukui nut shells and charcoal. Site 25735 was interpreted as a permanent habitation complex with Feature B functioning as the foundation for a roofed structure and Feature A serving as a yard. 24 West Face (0.5) � 0 0 3.0 6.0 9.011 (0.6) ' (0.5) 1.aycrl r,� Feature p IA 2.0 3.0m kr 30cm _ TU-2 Laycr 11 edrock ' —Level bedttxk— ', `'�3;�, .Z?;oj5� i 0 50 100an —Sloping soil— Layer 1-Tightly packed pebbles,cobbles and small boulders; � - ";,., (0.35) amm Na cultural remains present � Layer ll-loose dark brown(7.5Y1t32)Or with rr�^^`".•. , 12%pebble and cobble inclusions; Cultural remains present (0.51 : >>l _,,, .. ..... r rrr 3 0.22) � r -P J/ .�,� rrrrry�r .X�� vta.`.`.�t�� 7> Blister opening { .r'r j ��L�t�t m Feature A (0.5 deep) rTC.r C Yj )) i (0.38)/ r rrrrr.::I�'7 J))J,J `t'C llLlii.3)) � F �^'•�l'1�� �.�r rrrr:l,,,,,),j'jJ)J ICt CCtlttt))�)7 r?r�rrr�r,i)h )))Jj/ r�r�i.rr•r.''rrrrr''.r(r{,r;r.Crzrrr)j.,),�),')f;')h)Slope direction . /(1/.�r<r�<rR�< 'J�Ju 38f'5 )0.YYr� ,fr rrr ";'0 Mr42) (0.35)(0.66) Height in meters r� .,r,cr�r�FrF��^„Sr.?�'rrT'r"�r)�)r)J�'�.;f J1 �a=:::::Cti�'•:J>'...r:'t`r.0>'h�))'):)J) —Sloping soil— Blsteropening �6(0.6 deep)rColl e (. ��))) 8 �P Edge ofmt r C rrrrr�c, r�r �3j1 / /ttrF (0.82 r fry ) >h))'' t ... (0 )-ft ".�)��.i r "rJ))) ))J) BliatcroPing Level soil 1 C,Cc4:itt'.c(,,ti,i,i`.�ttlr;tL`�C�,itr�t1rc44ctfcCftt Lrii,C�r)))j)))(0.54doep « ,` r �))� r, '4 r (0.501) /(0.47) .rft.Cobble pavement , J.. "CQ Vertical slab (0.97) Figure 19.Site 25735 Plan Map and TU-2 West face Profile Site 25737 Site 25737 consists of a lava blister(Feature A) and a modified outcrop (Feature B) located on and adjacent to a large irregularly-shaped bedrock outcrop (Figure 20). Two vertical lava blisters are also located on top of the outcrop, one in the central portion and one at the southwest end. The floors of the two vertical blisters are bare lava and no cultural material is associated with either. Areas of piled cobbles and small boulders are located along the western side of the outcrop at the southern end. Vertical access to the Feature A lava blister opens on an irregularly-shaped chamber and the floor in the eastern portion is bare lava capped by scattered roof fall, while the western portion of the floor is capped by a soil deposit containing scattered charcoal. Two small passages extend off the main chamber and the passage floors are bare lava with no cultural remains present. The oval Feature B modified outcrop adjoins a linear pile of cobbles and small boulders.The modified outcrop surface is relatively level but unpaved.No cultural remains were present on the sur- face. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in test unit(TU-3)revealed three layers overlying bedrock(Haun and Henry 2006b). Layer I consisted of 52 to 66 cm of pebbles, cobbles and boulders, but no cultural re- mains. Bedrock was encountered below Layer I in the northern portion of the unit, while Layer Il un- derlies Layer I in the southern portion of the unit.Layer II consisted of 16 to 19 cm of dark brown fine silt with 50% pebble, cobble and boulder inclusions, Thaididae and Cypraea shells, and charcoal. Layer III consisted of 12 to 19 cm of dark yellowish brown fine silt with 40% pebble and cobble in- clusions and four fragments of charcoal. Site 25737 is interpreted as a complex of possible permanent habitation features with Feature B potentially representing a collapsed foundation for a permanent habitation roofed structure and the Feature A lava blister possibly serving as an associated sleeping or storage area. Site 25738 Site 25738 is a lava tube with access from the east side of an oval hole(Figure 21). The en- trance opens onto an irregularly-shaped chamber. Most of the tube's floor is bare lava, but soil and scattered roof fall overlie the floor in the western portion of the tube. A Cypraea shell and a water- worn basalt cobble are associated with the soil deposit. Site 25738 was interpreted as a temporary ha- bitation shelter and was not tested. Site 25739 Site 25739 is a multi-tiered rectangular paved terrace(Figure 22).The east side of the lower tier abuts a bedrock outcrop. The north and west sides of the upper tier are bordered by roughly stacked cobble and small boulder retaining walls. No cultural remains were observed in association with the terrace. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in test unit(TU-6) in the surface of the lower(main) tier revealed two layers overlying bedrock(Hann and Henry 2006b). Layer I consisted of 41 to 54 cm of pebbles, cobbles and boulders with no cultural remains. Bedrock was encountered below Layer I in the northeastern portion of the unit, while Layer 11 underlies Layer I in the other areas of the unit. Layer II consisted of 7 to 29 cm of dark brown silt with 35% gravel, pebble and cobble inclusions, volcanic glass flakes, marine shells,a waterworn coral,a waterworn basalt pebble, kukui nutshells and charcoal. Site 25739 was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation roofed structure. Site 25740 Site 25740 is an oval terrace built against the southwest side of a bedrock outcrop(Figure 23). The northeast and north sides of the terrace abut the edge of the outcrop. A collapsed retaining wall extends along the west, southwest and south sides. The surface is relatively level but unpaved,and no cultural material was observed. Several voids in the surface stones are present along the northeast side of the structure,adjacent to the surface outcrop. Excavation of a 1.8 by 1.0 in test unit(TU-7)revealed an architectural layer (Layer I)sealing the entrance to a small lava blister(Haun and Henry 2006b). Layer I consisted of 14 to 70 cm of cobbles and small boulders and one Cypraea shell.The interior of the lava blister is roughly oval and the floor is covered 26 E.iF— Insel A f° ! slate a lava Interior of Feature A (03) hmm f (0.3)-N6A61 a M=M (p3) _�h(0�35) MIS) 1 L-d it with C�I`hawl Sam lana {0.3) (0.7)"�7 fl L._ F '.104) / t:iiMIlce L,ya n -----_ Odpliac (0.7 m deep) --L.7c,to totuior Hades of (0.4)_, ttma lmn loam ---— 'i%hYIi3 lava bli mr tlodied 0 5o loo- (0-2) LfQ 1-Tyay p kd p:bblb...bbk. d.-0 b-Mm: o kewLN:mmm pcx p 3.0 6.0 0,00 Uya n•L—dd bvaa(7.5YMIsa W p LO 2.0 3.0m 507ipcbhle cabE4 uad bov4kr iklutm; L.ya01 Lease"y n-6hb—(1OYRW)eL.A 40%pd,WeA.Wk—k— �r r-r V;;^ ��, Feature B Cahanl�gncu /-r'�`r'('rT^^^` •"1'l�7 (CC�C<�t-2(�,���>��� (0.42) (0.38) TU-3 v� Level soil j (1.18).._ (0.81) Vertical blister' —Slightly sloping soil— s (1.9 deep) (1.44) Entrance to Feature A 0.93) (see Inset A) (0.5) Datum rt7 ��! •^r Level soil rr^ Slope direction �� `�, �„ Vertical blister (0.7 deep) _ (1.12) (1.1) Height in meters (0.57 (1.36) z 5'r rrr-rr' Collapse 0 6.0 12.0 18.Oft ,,,,,,,,,,,,, Edge of outcrop 0 2.0 4.0 6.0m Figure 20. Site 25737 Plan Map and TU-3 East Face Profile 27 i Slope direction (0.42)=Height in meters , -------- Dripline F1 Area of soil — --Sloping soil / with cobbles and rubble ' / (0.25) C Interior limits of lava tube i / (0,15) / —Bare�lava — r Waterwom r co basalt cobble r Datum Entranceto ��Y lava tubed ti (0.44) -Slopingsoil- 1 (0.8}a (0.84) ' t J i Cypraca sp.shell o (0.43) (0.25) p 3.0 6.0 9.011 0 1.0 2.0 3.Om Figure 21.Site 25738 Plan Map East Face Slope direction 0 (0.81)=Height in meters Layer I r-r( Collapse 50cin —Layer it Faced side 7-� Edge of outcrop 100cm Level pebble and cobble pavement 50 100cm Layer 1-Tightly packed pebbles,cobbles and small boulders; No cultural remains pnwnt Layer 11-Loose dark brown(7.IYR3121 sill with 35%gravel,pebble and cobble inclusions; Cultural remains present Upper tier _(0.81) rr_r- r-r- C Sloping soil (0.9) r (0.43) 0 Main tier r —Level outcrop— TU-6 (1.0 QC Datum���'Lt-�C. � .�• L .J/�:, Q r z 0 3.0 6.0 9.Oft JJ 0 1.0 2.0 3.Om Figure 22. Site 25739 Plan Map and TU-6 East Face Profile 29 Northeast Face 0 T Out Slope direction (0.21)=Height in meters Layers 90sn Blistervoid �, (0.421=Height in meters —� inside the blister Outcrop' ii 1-w it Collapse Bedrock Edge of outcrop 180en 0 90 1 80c Layer 1-Loosely packed cobbles and small boulders; Cultural remains present Layer it- Dark brown(10YR 212)silt with 10°16 cobble $loping soil and pebble inclusions;No cultural remains [0.4] s 4 Interior limits �{ -.,,., of blister i -� { ' (0.21) {tl.y) TU-7 Voids in surface (0.61 Datum (0.5) `. ,.. z ------ Sloping soil 0 3.0 6.0 9.Oft 0 1.0 2.0 3.Om Figure 23. Site 25740 Plan Map and TU-7 Northeast Face Profile 30 by a level soil deposit. Excavation of TU-7 continued into the soil (Layer 11)on the blister floor. This deposit consisted of 12 to 16 cm of dark brown silt with 10% cobble and pebble inclusions, but no cultural remains.Site 25740 was interpreted as a temporary habitation site. Site 25741 Site 25741 is an irregularly-shaped modified outcrop and a lava blister at the southern end of the outcrop (Figure 24). The blister consists of a small oval-shaped chamber and the floor is smooth bare lava. The eastern side of the modified outcrop is roughly paved with cobbles and small boulders and a depression is located adjacent to the west side of the paved area. The depression is a natural low spot in the surface outcrop and bordered by an alignment of small boulders and cobbles. A boulder capping a small recessed space represents a possible cupboard located at the southern end of the paved area.No cultural remains were observed at the site. The western side of the outcrop also contains a cobble and pebble paved area lacking cultural remains. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in test unit (TU-8) in the western paved area revealed two layers overlying bedrock(Haus and Henry 2006b). Layer I consisted of 34 to 49 cm of pebbles, cobbles and small boulders but no cultural remains. Layer It consisted of 3 to 25 cm of dark brown silt with 5% pebble and cobble inclusions and charcoal fragments. Site 25741 was interpreted as the possible foun- dation for a permanent habitation roofed structure. Site 25743 Site 25743 is a compartmentalized oval enclosure (Figure 25). The sides are collapsed and exposed bedrock outcrops are incorporated into the walls along the north and east sides. The eastern portion of the structure is an oval enclosure with no entrance. The western portion contains an oval enclosed area open along the west side. The internal floor of each compartment is level soil and no cultural remains were associated with the feature. Site 25743 was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation roofed structure.No testing was undertaken at the site. Site 25744 Site 25744 is an oval enclosure with collapsed sides that appears to have no apparent entrance into the interior(Figure 26). The interior floor is level soil capped by scattered cobbles and boulders. No cultural remains were present on the surface. Excavation of a 1.0 by 0.5 m test trench inside the enclosure documented two layers over bedrock(Hammatt et al. 1987). Stratum I consisted of 3 to 50 cm of dark grayish brown silt loam, but no cultural remains. Stratum II consisted of 4 to 8 cm of very dark grayish brown silt loam and charcoal. A sample of the charcoal from Stratum II submitted for radiometric age determination yielded a calibrated age range of AD 1645-1950. Site 25744 was inter- preted as the foundation for a permanent habitation roofed structure. Site 25745 Site 25745 is a rectangular, partially paved and partially unpaved platform (Figure 27). No cul- tural remains were present on the surface. Excavation of three 1.0 by 1.0 in test trenches (Hammatt et al. 1987).Two(TI and T2)were excavated over a roughly paved area at the west end of the platform,and one (T3) was excavated over the exposed soil deposit. No profiles for the trenches units were included in the Hamman et al. report. TI and T2 documented 50 cm of platform fill overlying two soil deposits(Strata I and II) on bedrock. Platform fill consisted of boulders and cobbles, four basalt hammerstones, a volcanic glass flake, a basalt adze fragment,a burned shark tooth and sparse marine shell. Stratum I consisted of 10 to 20 cm of very dark grayish brown silt loam and volcanic glass flakes, marine shells and charcoal. Stra- tum II consisted of 2 to 4 cm of loose dark brown silt loam with no cultural remains. Excavation of Trench T3 revealed two soil layers over bedrock. Stratum I consisted of 10 to 20 cm of very dark grayish brown silt loam that contained volcanic glass flakes,volcanic glass cores and sparse marine shells.Stratum 11 con- sisted of I to 2 cm of dark brown silt loam but no cultural remains. Site 25745 was interpreted as the foun- dation for a permanent habitation roofed structure. 31 1 Boulder over t• cupboard t . Bubble%' J J:/. entrance ,Jw ---datum Cobble/pebble paving \,.• . (0.95) -8 (0.31 _ •'J:,`rr,;;:'; I Depression (091) Cobble/pebble paving (0.6) Bedrock outcrop (1.2) Rough pov,ng ' Enllnnce Bubble A , �A North Face 0 i Layer 4ocm Key: - _!—Layer 11 0 5.0 //B«h/ock FEET o so loon„ IOMETERS Layer 1-Tightly packed pebbles,cobbIcs and mail bouldca No cultural r'Rnaita pnl'u (0.91)=Height in meters Layer 11-Loose dark brown(I OY10/3)silt.with 3 pebble and cobble includonK Cultural remains present Figure 24. Site 25741 Plan Map and TU-8 North Face Profile(modified from Hammatt et al. 1987: 84) 32 i j Slope direction �.r (0.67)=Height in meters i Sloping rocky soil and outcrops r-t�� Collapse Exposed outcrop F] Level silty soil (0.59) r�rm 0.67) l (0.49) ( »> L 0.34} } )? Datum (0.55} (0.57 r 0.69) (0.49) (1.0) C� "�� ` •` _ .r �IL.�S'}. (0.88) j Sloping rocky soil and outcrops 0 z 0 4.5 9.0 13.56 0 1.5 3.0 4.5m l Figure 25. Site 25743 Plan Map 33 (0.3) a Q v 0 0 D —collapsed Datumv QAp(GQ�p Q O G400 0 0043 A o p o O00 Colapsed d�i (1.3) Soil with 0.35) scattered boulders d `Collapsed p a (0.6) opQ Q t0.9) i Q `� (1.2) (1.35) I I 1 Key: Basalt bedrock 0 5 FEET METERS Figure 26. Site 25744 Plan Map(modified from Hammatt et al. 1987:24) 34 First course is upright boulders (0.65) f Collapsed (0.35) {0.6} I Polished adze flake r/ - on surface ^, s T3 r.,�', Soil , A O Soil , u.4� Probable entrance (0.3}- "'^ , •,-• S (� 'mss q (0.6} (0.55} , Datum First course is upright boulders Soil of T3 T2 TI A " , Key: — tlasalt bedrock ioos FEET METERS (0.55)=Height in meters Figure 27. Site 25745 Plan Map(modified from Hammatt et al. 1987:26) 35 Site 25746 Site 25746 is a lava tube accessible from an oval vertical hole that opens onto an irregularly- shaped chamber(Figure 28). A level soil deposit is present on the central portion of floor. A water- worn basalt small boulder,three waterworn cobbles, a kukui nutshell and a Cellan shell scraper was associated with the soil deposit.An area of soil with scattered roof fall is on the floor in the northwes- tern portion of the chamber.A linear passage extends to the southeast and south from the main cham- ber. The floor at the northern end of the passage is covered by soil and scattered roof fall, but other- wise,the remaining passage floor is bare lava.No cultural remains were observed in the passage. Ex- cavation of two trenches just inside the entrance to the tube (T1 1.0 by 1.0 m and T2 1.0 by 0.5 m) documented identical soil stratigraphy, consisting of three soil strata overlying bedrock. Stratum I consisted of 3 to 4 cm of dark brown silt loam, a volcanic glass flake and a fragment of cut gourd. Stratum II consisted of 5 to 10 cm of very dark grayish brown silt loam,volcanic glass flakes, a basalt flake and a cut shell fragment. Stratum III consisted of a thin discontinuous deposit of a dark yello- wish brown(IOYR 4.6)silt loam overlying bedrock with no cultural remains present.Midden material from Stratum I and II were not segregated, but recovered midden debris consisted of marine shells, urchin, fish bones, rat bones, kukui nutshells, gourd fragments, coral and charcoal. Trench locations were not mapped and their locations could not be discerned during the Haun&Associates inventory. Site 25746 is interpreted as a temporary habitation shelter. Site 25747 Site 25747 is a lava tube with a linear alignment of cobbles and small boulders located out- side the entrance (Figure 29). Access to the tube is from a rectangular hole in the surface bedrock. The entry opens onto an irregularly-shaped chamber with a soil-covered floor scattered with cobbles. Several fragments of wood are present at the northwest end of this chamber and a Cypraea shell is present to the south.A second Cypraea shell is located in the southwestern portion of this chamber, in an area of surface stones.Three passages extend beyond the main chamber.The floors in the passages are covered by soil. A waterwom basalt cobble and a fragment of waterworn coral are present on the floor of one passage. Hammatt et al.(1987)excavated three test trenches inside the lava tube. Tl con- sisted of a 1.0 by 1.0 m unit excavated adjacent to the tube entrance to the north.T2 and T3 were 0.25 by 0.25 m units excavated in the main chamber of the tube. The test trenches documented identical soil stratigraphy,consisting of three strata over bedrock.Stratum I in all three units consisted of 5 to 7 cm of dark grayish brown(IOYR 4/2)silt loam. Marine shell and charcoal were recovered from Stra- tum I in T1, and sparse charcoal was recovered from 72 and T3. Beyond that, the cultural remains from these units were not segregated by stratum or unit in the Hammatt et al. (1987) report. Midden remains from the trenches consisted of marine shells and charcoal. Stratum ti consisted of 13 to 20 cm of compact dark brown (IOYR 3/3) silt loam. A variety of cultural remains were recovered from TI, but only charcoal was recovered from T2 and T3. Artifacts from Stratum II consisted of a volcanic glass core,a volcanic glass flake and a coral abrader. Stratum III consisted of I to 2 cm of dark yello- wish brown silt loam with no cultural remains. Site 25747 was interpreted as a temporary habitation shelter. Site 25748 Site 25748 consists of three enclosures(Features A, B and D),five terraces(Features C,H,J, K and L), a mound,(Feature E), a platform(Feature F), a wall (Feature G)and a U-shaped enclosure (Feature I)constructed in an area 62.5 m long by 50.0 m wide(Figure 30). Feature A is a rectangular enclosure with a level soil floor and no obvious entrance. Hammatt et al. (1987) excavated a 1.0 by 1.0 m test trench(Trench 1) in the enclosure and documented three layers overlying bedrock. Stratum I was described as loosely consolidated modem A-horizon. Stratum II was described as the cultural layer and contained sparse marine shell.Stratum II was described as culturally sterile subsoil. 36 Slope direction I —Sloping soil— (0.45)=Height in meters Interior of lava tube Rooffall 0.35) Bare lava floor Level soil Level soil with (0.45)- (0.1) scattered roof fall ! Kukui nut (0.72) Cellan sp. Waterworn scraper basalt cobbles Waterwom (0.7) – O basalt boulder (0.83) \ (0 4) (0 6) Entrance to J f \ ' lava tube (0.85 m deep) Datum 1 _ (0.15 I Bare lava floor z —Slop'i g soil— 0 3.0 6.0 9.0ft ! 0 1.0 2.0 3.Om Figure 28. Site 25746 Plan Map 37 , 'Exterior alignmem A Wood V s /1 T' () +� Soil • _ '; O Datum Ni , Cowrie shell ti ' r I I Soil �T3 (0.46) ©d DCowrie shell (0.76) - (0.75) Roof column " p (0.35) (0.3) ,,11 1 Waterwornell basalt cobble " (0.1) Watonvorn coral Lava tube continues (0.63)\\ ` (0.45) A- wood Soil Ai Key- ----- Cove entrance Basalt bedrock (0.8)=Height in meters 0 — 5 FEET METERS 0 t — Figure 29.29. Site 25747 Plan Map(modified from Hammatt et al. 1987:20) 38 Fmmm A µan I— D— (IAS) 0 tW o ! SeJ/b«a mri 1.5) Urcaavnrd tYn zul m .:•- FrnumC OTi 40.. arm Fmmml 64.«i r. • Famml# '' (0.0 rvy Ln)<rU (033 -_''-'� t_ (a.6) "{. (0s5) (035 - •�8e;a ��V"^^'U 0.92). Dcdrcek Damm 4-.' f0b5 Shc Q Capbo"a /E' R0.m r,{ D—. 0.4) a SO t00cm ca>aPwd-+;`•t �: Lay:<iT's�H twekcarc6lks coromesaaa wba,ms: 12 A (IPI tL15) Cukumlrenneaspmara Fmrure2 riu.co r: (033 Layer lF•taau wrydmk gray'sh brpwn(tOYNl11 N0. f wkh 23%1-tbk.cobb1c.Wbwider I hni= " {033) Fmmaa li Cufmvimmmaprramc Dail—F.—D poo ,•fae) I u) (0.9) TUI bwMer P«r�r ` 0.3} y O (0.9 .. ° Oa (03} Fmmm K .; "(0b O 0�.6) Fomm E caeo.dl ( Y C�1ra0 1 s x FI °a f y 0.2) :p. (0.3) A i n Damm FpuprtL (Ob) (Ob 'p`G FamreG O.or«sbn(OAS) ' y $•���' t::t�r "���===JJJ (III Cabb4+oebbb Fc+v+Mm w (os G h e• '�`� Pebble Dwvn lane W&.k Uaoa 0.d) (U63)�Htigbt m nmm w as�aG ap�pOkC EW _ p Qix xo b V FEF1 0 Sai rr*ra« OP..�.�. �rnEtEa3 Fmmra F , Figure 30.Site 25748 Plan Map and TU-11 West Face Profile(modified from Hamman et al. 1987:63) Feature B is an oval enclosure with an entrance at the southwestern corner and a level soil floor. Feature C is a multi-tiered rectangular paved terrace. Hammatt et al. (1987)excavated a 4.0 m long by 1.0 m wide trench (Trench 1) across the northwestern side of the lower tier and a portion of the middle tier, revealing a layer of architectural fill over three soil deposits on bedrock. The architec- tural layer was 25 to 65 cm and contained coral fragments and a basalt adze fragment. Stratum I con- sisted of 2 to 10 cm of loose dark brown silt loam, a Conus shell bead, volcanic glass flakes, marine shells, pig bone, and kukui nutshells. Stratum II consisted of 10 to 30 cm of very dark grayish brown silt loam with cobble inclusions, marine shells and pig bone. Stratum III consisted of 2 to 10 cm of dark brown silt loam. Feature D is a large rectangular enclosure open to the northeast, with a possible prepared entrance along the southwestern side. The northeast side contains a low bedrock outcrop and the southwestern entrance is bordered by two parallel walls that lead to Feature E. A cupboard is incorpo- rated into the eastern corner. Hammatt et al. (1987) indicate that the cupboard was originally capped with two basalt slabs, but these have been removed. The interior of the enclosure consists of slightly sloping soil and exposed bedrock.No cultural remains were observed in association with the enclosure. Feature E is a crude oval mound built on a bedrock outcrop. A rough depression is located along the northwest side of the mound. Feature F is a paved platform, an adjoining terrace and a crude pile of cobbles and small boulders located to the southwest of the feature. A depression was noted in the center of platform. Hammatt et al.(1987)excavated a 2.0 m by 1.0 m test trench(Trench 1)the depression on the platform, revealing architectural fill over three soil deposits. The stone layer was comprised of 50 cm of tightly packed boulders, cobbles and pebbles containing sparse marine shell, coral and a volcanic glass flake.Bedrock was encountered below this layer through most of the unit. Three soil layers were present beneath the depression. Stratum I consisted of 2 to 7 cm of loose dark brown silt loam. Stratum Il consisted of 10 to 35 cm of dark brown silt loam with cobble inclu- sions, sparse marine shells and volcanic glass. Stratum III consisted of 2 to 5 cm of dark brown silt loam but no cultural material. The soil terrace bordering the platform to the northwest is characterized by a retaining wall and bedrock outcrops retaining a soil deposit. Hammatt et al. excavated a 0.5 by 0.5 m test trench (Trench 2) into the terrace surface, revealing three soil layers overlying bedrock. Stratum I consisted of 5 cm of loose dark brown silt loam with no cultural remains. Stratum II con- sisted of 2 cm of loose rocky very dark grayish brown silt loam with sparse charcoal flecks. Stratum III consisted of 5 cm of culturally sterile dark yellowish brown silt loam. Feature G is a curved wall bordering a level soil deposit with no cultural remains present. Feature H is a multi-tiered roughly square terrace located on top of a prominent outcrop. Two tiers are paved and two are unpaved. Hammatt et al.(1987)excavated a 1.0 by 1.0 m test trench(Trench 1) into the surface of a paved portion of the terrace and documented an architectural layer overlying three soil deposits.No profile is available for this unit and no depths of the Stratum I and lI soil deposits are presented in the text.The architectural layer consisted of 55 cm of cobbles and small boulders but no cultural remains. Stratum I consisted of loose dark brown silt loam and no cultural remains. Stratum 11 consisted of very dark grayish brown silt loam. Cultural remains from this deposit consisted of a Cy- praea shell,charcoal flecks and several kukui nutshells. Stratum II consisted of I to 2 cm of dark brown silt loam and no cultural remains. A 1.0 by 1.0 m test trench (Trench 3) was excavated over a cupboard by Hammatt et al. though no profile is presented.Trench 3 revealed a stone layer over a soil deposit overlying bedrock. Excavation indicated that the cupboard was lined with upright slabs with a soil floor.Cultural remains from the architectural layer consisted of land snail shells, rat bones, and kukui nutshells. The soil deposit contained marine shells, urchin fragments,kukui nutshells, charcoal and coral. Hammatt et al.(1987)excavated a 1.0 by 1.0 m test trench (Trench 2) in the soil surface of the unpaved portion of the terrace, adjacent to a rough paved area.This test revealed the same three soil deposits noted in Trench 1,though no profile or 40 depths are provided in the text. Cultural remains were recovered from Stratum 11 consisting of a Cy- praea shell,kukui nutshells and charcoal. Feature I is a U-shaped enclosure that abuts bedrock outcrops on the northwest and south. The enclosure floor is level soil. Feature J is a large L-shaped terrace bordered by a bedrock outcrop and scattered boulders on the northeast side. The southern end well paved cobbles but the rest is less carefully paved. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit(TU-11)over the terrace revealed an architec- tural layer(Layer 1) overlying a soil deposit(Layer Il) on bedrock(Haun and Henry 2006b). Layer I consisted of 51 to 58 cm of pebbles,cobbles and small boulders,a waterworn basalt cobble and char- coal. Layer 11 consisted of 6 to 21 cm of very dark grayish brown silt with 25% pebble, cobbles and boulder inclusions and marine shells,fish and pig bone,kukui nutshells,a waterworn coral pebble,and charcoal. Feature K is an unpaved rectangular terrace constructed partially on the surface of the Fea- ture L terrace. The Feature K terrace is bordered by roughly stacked retaining walls along the north- west and southeast sides and the surface is level soil. The Feature L rectangular terrace is located adjacent to the west side of Feature K and is bordered by aligned cobbles and small boulders to the northwest and by a bedrock outcrop with piled cobbles to the southwest. The surface is a level soil deposit. Site 25748 was interpreted as a complex of permanent habitation features. Features A,C,F,H and J were interpreted as the foundations for roofed structures and the large multi-tiered Feature H terrace potentially served as the foundation for multiple structures.Two enclosures were interpreted as special purpose structures(Features B and 1)and the Feature D enclosure likely served as a yard. The Feature G wall may have partially enclosed a yard associated with the Feature F platform. The Fea- tures K and L terraces were interpreted as activity areas and the Feature E mound may have f inc- tioned as site furniture. Site 25750 Site 25750 is a walled oval terrace built against the southwestern side of a domed pahoehoe knoll (Figure 31). Cobbles and small boulders are located at the eastern end of the outcrop and there is vertical open blister located on the knoll crest. Soil is present on the blister floor but no cultural remains were ob- served.A wall extends across the south side of the terrace and portions of the south side are faced,but dete- riorated. The western side of the ten-ace is generally collapsed though an intact section is present in the center. The terrace surface is level soil. No associated cultural material was documented. Site 25750 was interpreted as the foundation for a permanent habitation roofed structure. Site 25752 Site 25752 is a largely collapsed but originally faced, rectangular terrace built against the south- west side of a bedrock outcrop(Figure 32).An area of level cobble and pebble paving is present along the south side of the terrace.No cultural remains were present on the surface. Excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit (TU-9) into the terrace pavement revealed an architectural layer (Layer 1) overlying a soil deposit (Layer 11) on bedrock(Haan and Henry 2006b). Layer I consisted of 8 to 35 cm of pebbles, cobbles and boulders but no cultural remains. Layer II consisted of 3 to 26 cm of very dark grayish brown silt with 45% gravel,pebble,cobble and boulder inclusions,volcanic glass flakes and Cypraea shells. A level soil deposit is located adjacent to the south end of the terrace and is bordered by a bedrock outcrop to the west.A pile of cobbles and small boulders is present on the northeast.A second pile of cob- bles and small boulders is located on the terrace surface east of the outcrop.No cultural remains were ob- served in association with the terrace. Hammatt et al. (1987) excavated a 0.5 by 0.5 m test trench in the terrace surface and documented four soil layers. Stratum la consisted of 5 cm of dark grayish brown silt loam. Stratum lb was comprised of 3 cm of dark brown silt loam with 10-20%gravel inclusions.Stratum Il consisted of 16 cm of very dark grayish brown silt loam and Layer III consisted of 6 em of dark yellowish. 41 T Slope direction Sloping rocky soil and outcrops (0.46)=Height in meters err Collapse Faced side Edge of outcrop Level soil ♦ Pahoehoc knoll (0.86m deep) <C CCCCC;;,C (0.35)' ' 0C <0CC (0.46} OC.0 C (0.47) ' atum (0.69) Iz Sloping rocky soil and outcrops I I 0 4.5 9.0 13.5R 0 1.5 3.0 4.5m Figure 31. Site 25750 Plan Map 42 East face Slope direction 0 -Laycr1 (0.48)=Height in meters Layer It (t Collapse 50cm a �r O 6Faced side 0 50 100cm Layer I-Tightly packed pebbles,cobbles and small boulders; „ Edge of outcrop No cultural remains present Layer 11-Loose very dark grayish brown(10YR3/2)sift c with 45%gravel,pebble,cobble and boulder inclusions; ( Level pebble and Cultural remains present E _' cobble pavement Outcrop (0.48) 1 —Sloping soil (.. (0.38) <{( r( f cc� (C� >>1 ` {0.6) (0.95 ` _TU_9 Datum r 1.2) �► (L (0.5) �v J 0.81) z / Level soil 0 4.5 9.0 13.5ft —Slopingsoil— p 1.5 3.0 4.5m Figure 32 Site 25752 Plan Map and TU-9 East Face Profile 43 brown silt loam over bedrock.No cultural remains were recovered and the site was interpreted as the foun- dation for a permanent habitation roofed structure. Site 25753 Site 25753 is a complex of 22 features consisting of three terraces(Features A 1, L and N 1), a walled terrace (Feature A2), eight enclosures (Features B, Cl, I, J, K 1, K2, O and P), a pavement (Feature C2), four platforms(Features D, E, F and M),two lava blisters(Features G and N2),a mod- ified outcrop(Feature H)and two mounds(Features Q and R).The site area is 100.0 m long and 65.5 m wide (Figure 33). Feature Al is an unpaved rectangular terrace that abuts a bedrock outcrop. The northeast side of the terrace adjoins the southwest side of the Feature A2 walled terrace. Feature A2 is an oval, unpaved, walled terrace that abuts the Feature A 1 on the west. It is 12.8 m long and 10.1 m wide with a 3.6 m gap at the northern end.The northeast side of the structure abuts the southwestern corner of the large Feature C enclosure. Feature B is an oval enclosure that forms the northwest corner of the Feature C enclosure.The enclosure entrance is located in the center of the western wall.Two vertical basalt slabs and a vertical boulder incorporated into the south side of the enclosure and the vertical boulder was interpreted as a possible "god stone" by Hammatt et al. (1987). The enclosure floor is level soil. Excavation of a 2.0 by 1.0 m test unit (Trench 1) inside the northeast corner of the enclosure revealed two soil layers overlying bedrock (Hammatt et al. 1987). Stratum I consisted of 2 to 5 cm of brown to dark brown silt loam but no cultural remains. Stratum 11 consisted of 17 to 27 cm of dark grayish brown silt loam with a volcanic glass core, waterworn Cy- praea shells and coral fragments. Feature C1 is a large rectangular enclosure bordered by Features A2 and B to the southwest, by Feature H to the south, by Feature D to the north and by Features E and F to the northeast. The Feature C2 pavement and the Feature G lava blister are located within the enclosure. Two entrances provide access to the enclosure interior. One is located along the west end of the north wall and the other is located at the west end of the south wall. The enclosure walls are relatively intact with faced sections present along the interior. The enclosure floor is soil capped by scattered cobbles and low bedrock outcrops.Feature C2 is an oval pavement located within the interior of the Feature C 1 enclo- sure.The pavement is crudely constructed but relatively level with the surrounding ground surface. Feature D is a crudely paved, collapsed platform built against the exterior northern side of the Feature C1 enclosure. The platform shape is irregular and the sides have collapsed outward. The northeastern end of the platform contains a small enclosure. Excavation of a 0.5 by 0.5 m test unit (Trench 2)was excavated adjacent to the northwest of Feature D, revealing three soil deposits identic- al to the stratigraphic profile noted in a test unit in the adjacent Feature E structure (Hammatt et al. 1987).No cultural remains were present in Stratum I or Ill,but a Cypraea shell and a horse tooth were recovered from Stratum 11. Feature E is a paved rectangular platform located adjacent to the exterior northeast side of the Feature CI enclosure and within the Feature K enclosure. Excavation of a 3.0 by 1.0 m test unit (Trench 1) in northern side of the platform revealed an architectural layer and three soil deposits over bedrock(Hammatt et al. 1987). The architectural layer varied from 25 to 45 cm and contained sparse Cypraea shell and coral. Stratum I consisted of loose very dark brown silt loam with abundant organic material of unstated thickness, with abundant midden, including several pig bones. Stratum II con- sisted of loose dark grayish brown silt loam and cobbles of unstated thickness,containing diminished quantities of midden debris. Stratum III consisted of culturally sterile loose dark yellowish brown silt. The cultural remains from this trench were not segregated by stratum but recovered debris includes marine shells, urchin,crustacean,fish,bird,pig and dog bones,kukui nutshells,coral and charcoal. 44 Ftu.R 9 2p da Fc,—.D (03 (0-9) FeatumQ ARE$ Calw.d %0 F--KI —A (0.3 0.65 D.45) (03) F.t—L (0.61) Height i.meter Fa (0.91 (0.5)F (0.9) Fcelaue (0.75) F—C2 1.22) F...Cl Featt.C win ra.ae (0.3) 1.52) to.7) 0.4) F1 Dmnm (C.3) F.— wide (1.25) F._H .4) 17-1—A2 (0.91) (04 0.15) ........... Future N2 (0.6 0 F...M Dmnm 03) 0.3) Friture 1 (0.61 1 (1.22 (0.9) n On (0.91 6 F-0 0,91) D.— Fcamm Al (0-95) (0.6)1 Ol(06) F.ti.NI Figure 33.Site 25753 Plan Map(modified from Hammatt etaL 1987:30) Feature F is a paved rectangular platform located adjacent to the north end of the Feature E platform and within the Feature K enclosure. Hammatt et al. (1987) noted a depression in the sou- theastern portion of the platform and excavated a 3.0 by 1.0 m unit and documented an architectural layer overlying three soil deposits on bedrock. The architectural layer consisted of 55 cm of loosely packed cobbles and boulders, coral and scoria abraders. Stratum 1 consisted of loose dark brown silt loam of unstated thickness,containing marine shells and bird, pig,dog and rat bones. Stratum II con- sisted of very dark grayish brown silt loam of unstated thickness, containing copious marine shells, kukui nutshells, mammal bones,two bird bone picks and a volcanic glass flake. Stratum III consisted of culturally sterile dark yellowish brown soil of unstated thickness. Feature G is an oval lava blister accessible from a modified entrance located within the Fea- ture C 1 enclosure.The entrance faces the southeast and is flanked by piled cobbles and small boulders outside the southeast side of the entrance. A curvilinear alignment of cobbles is located at the north- western end of the chamber. Hammatt et al. (1987) collected a coral abrader from the floor north of the alignment and excavated two trenches. One was located below the dripline(Trench 1)and the oth- er was outside the entrance over the piled cobbles (Trench 2). Trench I consisted of a 1.0 by 1.0 m unit,which documented two soil deposits over bedrock. Stratum 1 consisted of 2 to 5 cm of loose very dark brown silt loam with abundant organic material and sparse midden debris. Stratum II consisted of 20 to 30 cm of compact black silt loam, containing volcanic glass flakes and a core, marine shells, coral, kukui nutshells and charcoal in association with a small subsurface fire-pit. Trench 2 consisted of a 3.0 by 1.0 m unit,which documented 60 cm of soil overlying bedrock,containing several volcan- ic glass flakes, marine shells, kukui nutshells,coral and pig bones. A sample of the charcoal from the subsurface fire-pit was submitted for radiometric age detennination and yielded a calibrated age range of AD 1405-1620. Feature H is an oval modified outcrop built along the southern side of the Feature C 1 enclo- sure and adjacent to Feature G on the southeast. Exposed bedrock is visible in the central portion. Hammatt et al. (1987)excavated two 0.5 by 0.5 m test trenches(Trenches 3 and 4)over the modified outcrop and documented 30 cm of cobbles and pebbles overlying bedrock and sparse midden debris. Feature I is a large rectangular enclosure located adjacent to Feature H. The enclosure inte- rior is shallow patchy soil overlying bedrock. A mound is located in an area of level soil west of the enclosure. Feature J is a rectangular enclosure located adjacent to Feature 1, with which it shares a common wall.The north side of the enclosure is bordered by the Feature C 1 enclosure and by the Fea- ture F platform. The eastern side is defined by a series of low bedrock outcrops and the south side is bordered by a bedrock outcrop and a small boulder wall.The enclosure floor is level soil. Feature Kl is a rectangular enclosure located to the northeast of the Feature E and F plat- forms. It is bordered on the northwest by stone wall, on the northeast by disorganized rubble and on the southeast by the Feature K2 enclosure. A gap in the southwestern corner provides access. The northwest wall is collapsed at the western end but is ramp-like and descends to the southwest. The enclosure interior is level soil capped by scattered cobbles. Feature K2 is a crude oval enclosure located at the southeastern end of the Feature K1 enclo- sure. The enclosure interior is exposed bedrock in the northeastern and level soil elsewhere. Feature L is an unpaved, roughly L-shaped terrace southeast of Feature K2. A crude enclosure is constructed against the western side of the terrace and a gap at the northern end provides access. The interior is dominated by a slight soil filled depression. Feature M is a roughly paved, rectangular,tiered platform located to the south of Feature L. The main surface occupies the eastern portion of the feature, adjoining a lower, narrow tier on the west side. Feature N1 is a rectangular paved terrace located at the southeastern end of the site within the Feature O enclosure. Hammatt et al. (1987) excavated a 3.0 by 1.0 m test trench 46 (Trench 1)through the center of the terrace and documented an architectural layer over three soil de- posits on bedrock.The architectural layer consisted of 60 to 1 10 cm of cobbles and boulders,and con- tained marine shells and urchin fragments. Stratum I consisted of 4 to 10 cm of very dark brown silt loam with copious midden debris, volcanic glass flakes, a volcanic glass core and a coral abrader. Stratum II consisted 15 to 70 cm of dark gray silt loam with 50-60% pebble inclusions and volcanic glass flakes, basalt flakes, an urchin file and midden debris. The Stratum III deposit consisted of a discontinuous band of culturally sterile dark yellowish brown silt loam.The midden recovered was not segregated by unit or by stratum but consisted of marine shells, urchin, crustacean and fish remains, bird, pig and rat bones, kukui nutshells, coral and charcoal. Two charcoal samples recovered from Stratum II were submitted for radiometric analysis and the sample collected from 128 cm bd yielded a calibrated age range of AD 1660-1945, while the sample from 130 cm bd produced an age range of AD 1655-1950. Feature N2 consists of a small oval lava blister located to the northeast of Feature N 1 within the Feature O enclosure. The floor of the blister is covered by level soil. Hammatt et al. (1987)exca- vated a 1.0 m by 0.5 m test trench within the blister below the entrance and documented three soil lay- ers identical to that noted in the Feature NI trench. Stratum I consisted of 5 to 7 cm of very dark brown silt loam and contained sparse midden. Stratum II was 10 to 13 cm of dark gray silt loam with 50-60% pebble inclusions, containing volcanic glass flakes, marine shells, urchin, pig and rat bone, and kukui nutshells. Stratum III deposit consisted of a discontinuous band of culturally sterile dark yellowish brown silt loam. Feature O is a rectangular enclosure that surrounds Features NI and N2. The enclosure is open to the north. A level soil deposit discontinuously overlies exposed bedrock inside the enclosure. Hammatt et al. (1987)excavated three test trenches. Trench 3 consisted of a 1.0 by 1.0 m unit located in the soil area at the northeastern end of the enclosure.Trench 4 consisted of a 0.5 by 0.5 m unit lo- cated inside Feature O to the south of the Feature N2 lava blister.Trench 5 consisted of a 0.5 by 0.5 m unit located outside of the Feature O enclosure to the south and to the west of Feature P. All three trenches documented three soil strata overlying bedrock. Stratum I consisted of 3 to 7 cm of dark brown to very darkish silt loam with abundant organic material,sparse marine shells and coral pebbles. Stratum II consisted of 10 to 30 cm of black or dark gray to dark grayish brown silt loam containing volcanic glass flakes,marine shells, urchin fragments,coral,and kukui nutshells.A human incisor was recovered from Stratum II in Trench 3. Stratum III deposit was comprised of a discontinuous band of culturally sterile dark yellowish brown silt loam of unspecified thickness. Feature P is an irregularly-shaped enclosure located southeast of Feature O. It is open to the south and east. The west side is bordered by a wall and the north side is bordered by a low bedrock outcrop, on top of which is piled cobbles and small boulders. Level soil is exposed inside the enclo- sure. Features Q and R are oval-shaped mounds on a slope in the northeastern portion of the site.The surface of each mound is uneven and irregular. Site 25753 was interpreted as a complex of permanent habitation features. Features Al, B,C2, D, E, F, L, M and N1 were interpreted as foundations for roofed structures. Features A2,C1,1, J, KI, and O are enclosures that probably delineated the yard boundaries. Feature G and N2 lava blisters used as sleeping or storage space with Features H, K2 and P used as associated activity areas. The Feature Q and R mounds could represent simple site furniture, which is inferred from their relation- ship to the other features. Site 25757 Site 25757 is an agricultural complex represented by 1,257 features scattered throughout the project area from 180 to 565 ft elevation, which represent a component of the Kona Field System. Most of the features are mounds or modified outcrops (n=1,228).Nineteen terraces, 8 kua'iwi, a wall and a filled crack were also documented.The distribution of the terraces,kua`iwi, wall and filled crack 47 are depicted in Figure 3. A map depicting the spatial distribution of the mounds and modified out- crops is reproduced in the inventory report(Haun and Henry 2006b: figure 6). The mounds and mod- ified outcrops were interpreted as clearing piles created by consolidating surface stones from adjacent planting areas. The terraces were interpreted as gardens, based on the results of testing at terrace Fea- ture AKX, from which no cultural material was recovered. The kua`iwi and the Feature MV curvili- near wall were interpreted as boundaries of agricultural fields. The Feature ANC filled crack was dis- mantled and based on the absence of associated cultural materials was interpreted as agricultural clear- ing feature of unknown function. RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND METHODS Research Objectives The research objectives for data recovery at the sites are: I. To establish the age of the sites;and 2. To determine the function of the sites and the type and variety of activities conducted at each feature. The data recovery effort will determine the age of the sites. The data requirements for ad- dressing Research Objective 1 include stratigraphic data, charcoal for dating, and chronologically di- agnostic artifacts, faunal remains, and plant remains. These data will be obtained using controlled ex- cavations. Prior studies of sites in the Kona area provide limited functional interpretations of habitation features.These interpretations primarily consist of inferences concerning the duration and permanence of habitation. The interpretations include a simple dichotomy of temporary versus permanent using Cordy's(1981)criteria,which include formal type,structure size,and structural substantiveness. Var- iation in activities in individual dwelling structures is implicit in the model, but the specific types of activity are generally not defined. The proposed data recovery effort will attempt to define specific activities associated with the occupation of the habitation features(Research Objective 2). Haun et al. (2003x, 2003b, 2003c)have done this for a number of sites in North Kona District where the results provided a basis for characte- rizing variation in habitation site occupations. Many activities are evident from structural remains, artifacts, and ecofactual remains. For example, the presence of a hearth indicates the activity of mak- ing fire for cooking, warmth, or light. Precursor activities associated with a hearth include construc- tion of the feature and collection of firewood. While such activities appear obvious,the activities fre- quently are not explicitly enumerated. The goal of the present effort would be to explicitly define the full range of potential activities engaged in by the occupants of the features based on the qualitative range of cultural remains. Quan- titative data will be used to make inferences concerning the scope or intensity of the activities. The resulting constellations of potential activities can then be used to compare and contrast the nature of occupations associated with individual features or structures. It should be stressed that the effort will be limited to defining the range of potential activities based primarily on the qualitative range of cul- tural remains. 48 The relationship between cultural remains and activities is based on an interpretation of the activities associated with the use and production of the remains,which will be treated as site or feature "attributes". Activities can be grouped into craft and construction, subsistence, and other habitation- related or support activities. Craft and construction activities are activities that relate to the procure- ment and use of raw materials and to activities that convert the raw materials into usable items and structures. Subsistence activities relate to the procurement, production, preparation, and consumption of marine and terrestrial food resources. Other habitation, or support, activities include ritual, sleep, mortuary activities,recreation,and the provision of heat and light with fire. Many of these activities can also be broken down into primary and precursor activities, and those that potentially occurred either on-site,off-site,or in an undetermined location. There is always a possibility that some raw materials may have been obtained through trade or exchange; however, with the exception of stone, this usually cannot be demonstrated archaeologically. Remote sources of volcanic glass or basalt can only be identified through petrographic and chemical analyses that are beyond the scope of the research. As mentioned previously, the present study is limited to potential activities in the broadest sense. Data requirements for addressing Research Objective 2 include stratigraphic data,architectur- al features (i.e., hearths, post holes, etc.),and the recovery and analysis of artifacts and food remains. These data will be used to define the range of activities associated with the habitation features. The data recovery efforts at the sites within the two parcels will consist of the excavation of 38.0 sq in of excavation, mechanical excavation of four trenches to bisect four agricultural features and submission of 12 charcoal samples for radiometric age determination. Excavation units are pro- posed for 27 features at 11 of the 25 previously recommended data recovery sites(Table 1). Thirteen data recovery sites where additional hand excavation is not proposed consist of the two large agricul- tural complexes (Sites 24847 and 25757) and twelve sites composed of either one or two features. Four backhoe-excavation trenches are an expedient way to obtain datable samples from kua'iwi and terraces within the two large agricultural complexes. Many of the sites were extensively sampled dur- ing the inventory surveys and at several, little room remains for additional excavation, while at others sufficient data has been recovered to analyze feature function in the context of the project data recov- ery report. Specific data recovery proposals for each site are described below and summarized in Ta- ble 1. Site 24838 No additional excavation is proposed for the temporary habitation lava blister, based on the recovery of sparse marine shell and charcoal recovered in a 0.5 by 0.5 in unit, excavated during the inventory survey.Cultural material recovered during the inventory phase will be used to analyze activ- ities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function(see Figure 4). Site 24839 No additional excavation is proposed for the temporary habitation platform,based on the recovery of sparse marine shell and kukui nutshells recovered in a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit,excavated during the inventory survey.Cultural material recovered during the inventory phase will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function(see Figure 5). Site 24840 A 1.0 by 2.0 in unit will be excavated at this permanent habitation platform where limited quanti- ties of artifacts and midden debris were recovered during the inventory survey. Additional excavation is intended to recover additional cultural material to augment site and feature function interpretations. The unit will be located contiguous to the northwest corner of the previously excavated TU-6 and positioned over the rubble-filled depression and oriented to also sample the center of the platform(see Figure 6). The unit profiles will show the stratigraphic relationship of the boulder-ringed depression to the platform pavement and underlying deposits. 49 Table 1.Proposed Data Recovery and Identification of Previous Testing Site& Proposed Geta Data Recovery FeaNLoi�as Feature Site Previous Excavators Cultural Materia! Location Recovery Units Rationale at TYPa Type Testing TMK 3-7.7-08:121 24838 0s arse cm 1 blister T Nab 0.26 s Haun and Henry006a s marine shall&charcoal 24839 0 arse cm 1 platform T Hab 1.0 agm Halm mut Henry2008a sparse marine shall&kukut 24840 1 x 2 tools&midden 1 platform P Hab 2.25 so m Haun and Henry2008e vol plass,marine shell coral 24841 0 felt too small 1 platform T Hab 1.0 Sam Haun and Henry2006a ww basalt marine shell&charcoal 24843 1 x 2 fame tea 1 platform P Hab 1.3 sqm Haun and Henry2006a ww cors)&basalt•sparse midden 24844 0 sparse an 2 enclosureP Hab enc-1.25 spHaun and Henry(2005e) ww coral&basalt;sparse midden platform latfonn-1.0 s ar 24845 1 x 2 tools&midden 1 pavement P Hab 1.0 Sam Haun and Henry(2006al hammerstone pavement-1.0 sgrn(A) -ww coral omdn terrace-1.0 a"(B) B-ww marine shell&coral;kukui LARGE platform-1.0 sryn(C) C-adze flake,coral abrader,midden B-1 X 2 FEATURES 1 pavement D-sparse midden C-1 X 2 B-testing limited 2 terraces enclosure-0.25 sqm(D) E.vol glass,ww coral;midden 24846 H-1 X2 C-tads&midden 9 4 platforms P Hab platform.1.0 spar(E) Haun and Henry(20(16a) F-basalt&vol glass Hakes;midden I-1 X 2 H-tools platform-4.0 spm(F)s&midden 2 enclosures enclosure-0.25 spm(G} G-sparse midden I.tools&midden platform-1.0 ltgm(H) H-coral abraders;midden terrace-1.0 aqm(1) 1-vol glass flake,coral abrader,midden 119 mod outs 1 TRENCH- 14 mounds mod outacp(CU) 24847 BISECT KUA'IWI Obtain 142 5 enclosures Ag platform-1.0 sqm(CE) Houn and Henry(2006x) No cultural matanal Feature K A CW datable samples 2 walls terrace-1.5 sqm(AS) 1 platform 1terrace TOTAL 14.0 e m TOTAL.22.05 s m TMK 3.7.7-08:105,113 and 119 25735 1 x 2(enclosure) Large Feature 2 enclosure P Heb enclosure-0.5 sqm(A) Herrman at al.(1987), testing:vol glass&sparse midden Tools&midden terrace terrace-1.0 sq m B Haun and Henry2006b surface:coral abrader&adze ftM blister v.small blister 25737 0 unsuitable for 2 mad outcrop P Hab mod otdcrop-1,0 sqm(B) Haun and Henry(2006b) sparse midden work space 25738 1 X 1 no testing data 1 lava tube T Hab 25739 0 sparse an 1 terrace P Hab terrace-1.0 scim Haun and Henry2006b vol glass&sparse midden 26740 0 sparse txn 1 terrace T Hab terrace-1.8 sqm Haun and Henry2006b a midden 25741 0 sparse oar 2 lava tube P Hab mod out-1.0 sq m Haun and Hen mod outcm Henry{2006b} charcoal only 25743 2-1 x 1 no testing data1 erx9osure P Hab 25744 1 x 2 Large Feature 1 enclosure P Heb enc-0.5 sclin Hammett at al. 1987 charcoal only.AD 1645-1950 sufficient 4 heTIMISM oras 25745 0 m testing data 1 platform P Hab platform-3.0 sqm Hematt at al.(1987) adze frag,vol glass flakes&cores, shark tooth some midden 25746 0 sufficient 1 lava tube T Hab tube-1.5 sqm Hammett at al.(1987) vol glass&diverse midden testina data I` Table 1.Proposed Data Recovery and Identification of Previous Testing(cont.) Site& Proposed Data Data Recovery NO. Feature Site Previous Location RecoveryUnits Rationale Features T Excavators Cultural Material at Site Type Tie Testing sufficient lava tube vol glass talks$&care,coral abrader, 25747 0 testin data 2 al ent T Hab tube.1.12 sqm Hammatt et at.(1987) rse midden D•1 X 1 enc-1.0 sqm -sparse marine shell E-1 X1 Ali pressed 4 enclosures terrace-4.0 sqm(C) C-Conus bead,vol glass flakes, 25748 1-1 X 1 features rat 12 P Hab 5 terraces platform-2.5 sqm(F) Hammett at al.(1987), adze freg,midden K-1 X1 previously tested platform terrace-3.0 sqm(H) Haun and Henry(2008b) F-vol glass&sparse midden L•1 X 1 mound terrace-1.0 sqm(J) H-sparse midden J-diverse middan 25750 1 x 2 or -1x1 no testing data 1 terrace P Hab 25/52 0 sutflciem 1 terrace P Hab terrace-1.25 sqm Hammett at al.(1987), vol glass flakes&sparse midden testing data Haun and Henry2006b ass flakes&ca arse A2-1 x1 erre-2.0 sqm(a) midden C1-1 X 1 4 terraces platform-0.25 sgrn(0) 0-marine shall&home tooth C2-1 X 1 8 enclosures platform-3.0 act m(E) E-abundant&r5varse midden I-1 X 1 All proposed pavement platform-3.0 sqm(F) F-vol glass;abundant&diverse midden 25753 features not 22 4 platforms P Hab blister.4.0 sqm(G) Hammett at al.(1987) G-vol glass;csverse midden;AO 1405- L�r J 1 X 1 previously tested 2 bgstera mod out-0.5 sqm(H) 1620;coral abrader from surface of K1-1X1 2mounds terrace.3,O sgm(Nt) blister floor L-I X 1 mod outcrop blister-0.5 sqm(1,12) H.sparse midden M-1 X t enc-2.0 sqm(0) Ni-vol glass basalt flakes,coral abrader&diverse midden: 3 TRENCHES 1228 mod outs 1 KUA9UV1 Obtain 19 terraces 25757 (AMN or AOV) datable samples 1257 8 kuaTM Ag tested terrace(AKX) Hammett at al.(1987) AKX-no sutural material &2 TERRACES 1 wall (AG,EK,JP or YH) 1 filled crack TOTAL 24.0 scion TOTAL 43A2 sqm Site 24841 No additional excavation is proposed for this temporary habitation platform, based on the recovery of sparse midden debris recovered in a 1.0 by 1.0 m unit, excavated during the inventory survey.The feature is too small to easily accommodate additional excavation. Cultural material recov- ered during the inventory phase from TU-7 will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function(see Figure 7). Site 24843 A 1.0 by 2.0 m unit will be excavated at this large permanent habitation platform because only sparse midden debris was recovered during inventory testing from TU-11. Additional excavation is intended to recover additional cultural material to augment site and feature function interpretations. The unit will be located on the east side of the cobble alignment that appears to segregate space within the platform. The long axis of the unit will be oriented north-south, the west wall of the unit will be placed adjacent to the east side of the cobble alignment,and the north wall of the unit will intersect the north side of the platform(see Figure 8).Profiles of the north and west wall will show the stratigraph- ic relationship of the cobble alignment,platform surface,and landform surface. Site 24844 No additional excavation is proposed for this permanent habitation complex composed of a platform and adjoining enclosure, based on the recovery of sparse midden debris recovered in three test units(total 2.25 sq m),excavated during the inventory survey. Cultural material recovered during the inventory phase from TU-2, TU-9 and TU-10 will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function(see Figure 9). Site 24845 A 1.0 by 2.0 m unit will be excavated at this permanent habitation pavement.The unit will be excavated east of TU-lb, from which tools and sparse midden debris were recovered(see Figure 10). The long axis of the unit will be oriented northwest-southeast and the southeast portion of the unit will be placed over the low wall that borders the pavement on the southeast side. Unit profiles will show the stratigraphic relationship of the low wall,cobble pavement and underlying deposits. Site 24846 The data recovery at this permanent habitation complex will be focused on four large features where testing at the inventory level indicated that tools and midden debris are indicative of diverse or specialized activities (Features B, C, H and I). Cultural material previously recovered from the re- maining five features (Features A, D, E, F and G) will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function. Data recovery at the Feature B terrace will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 2.0 in unit, with the long axis of the unit oriented west-east and the east side of the unit placed over the east wall and the horizontal slab on the pavement surface to sample the central portion of the terrace(see Figure 12). The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the wall and terrace pavement to the underlying deposits. Data recovery at the Feature C platform will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 2.0 m unit placed in the west half of the unit to sample potentially segregated space within the platform,which is implied by the presence of a low wall constructed on the paved surface(see Figure 13).The long axis of the unit will be oriented north-south,the south wall will abut the two vertical slabs on the south side of the platform, and the northeast corner of the unit will be adjacent to the southwest edge of the low wall. The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the platform sides,the pavement, the low wall and the underlying deposits. Tools and midden debris recovered from the previously ex- cavated test unit(TU-19)indicated multiple activities were associated with use of the platform. 52 Data recovery at the Feature H platform will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 2.0 in unit to be placed in the approximate center of the feature, with the long axis oriented west-east so that the west edge of the unit is placed over the west edge of the platform (see Figure 18). The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the platform sides, the pavement, and the underlying deposits. Tools and midden debris recovered from previously excavated TU-20 indicate specialized activities were associated with use of the platform. Data recovery at the Feature I terrace will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 2.0 in unit to bisect the center of the cobble alignment, which potentially functioned to segregate space on the ter- race(see Figure 18).The long axis of the unit will be oriented north-south so that a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit is placed on the north side of the alignment and a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit is placed on the south side,each on either side of the alignment. The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the ter- race pavement, the alignment and the underlying deposits. Tools and midden debris recovered from previously excavated TU-21 indicate specialized activities were associated with use of the terrace. Site 24847 Data recovery within this agricultural complex will consist of mechanical excavation to ob- tain a profile across one of two features interpreted as kua`iwi(Feature BD or CW). These consist of linear inland-seaward oriented low walls that vary in length from 35.1 to 51.8 m, in width from 0.7 to 1.2 in and in height from 0.3 to 0.75 in.These features appear to have functioned as garden plot boun- daries.A backhoe will bisect the short axis of one of the two similar features to provide chronometric data relative to the feature's construction. Site 25735 Data recovery excavation at this permanent habitation complex will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 2.0 in unit to be located within the soil surface of the Feature A enclosure(see Figure 19). The long axis of the unit will be oriented north-south and the south edge of the unit will be placed against the south interior wall of the enclosure so that the unit profiles will document the relationship of the enclosure wall, the enclosure floor, and the underlying deposits. Previous testing and surface collections within the enclosure recovered tools and midden debris, implying multiple activities asso- ciated with its use. The Feature B terrace is small and previous testing recovered limited cultural ma- terial. Site 25737 No additional excavation is proposed for this temporary habitation lava blister and modified outcrop, based on the recovery of sparse midden debris recovered in association with the modified outcrop and the small space encompassed by the blister. Cultural material recovered during the inven- tory phase from TU-3 will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function(see Figure 20). Site 25738 A 1.0 by 1.0 in unit will be excavated within the interior of this temporary habitation lava tube because no subsurface testing was undertaken at the site during the inventory survey phase. The unit will be situated to the southeast of the entrance an area where soil deposition appears to be deep- est and/or contamination from the entry appears to be minimized (Figure 21). No previous testing was undertaken at the site. Site 25739 No additional excavation is proposed for this permanent habitation terrace, based on the re- covery of sparse cultural material recovered from excavation of TU-6 during the inventory survey. Cultural material recovered from TU-6 will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function(see Figure 22). 53 Site 25740 No additional excavation is proposed for this temporary habitation terrace, based on the re- covery of sparse cultural material recovered from excavation of TU-7 during the inventory survey. Cultural material recovered from TU-7 will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function(see Figure 23). Site 25741 No additional excavation is proposed for this permanent habitation lava tube and modified outcrop, based on the recovery of sparse cultural material recovered in association with the modified outcrop during the inventory survey. Cultural material recovered during the inventory phase from TU- 8 will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function (see Figure 24). Site 25743 Data recovery at this permanent habitation enclosure will consists of the excavation of two 1.0 by 1.0 in units to be located within the soil area of each compartment of the structure(see Figure 25). No previous testing was undertaken at the site. Units will be placed adjacent to a wall of each compartment to document the stratigraphic relationship of the enclosure walls and the underlying de- posits. Site 25744 Data recovery excavation at this permanent habitation enclosure will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 2.0 in unit, with the short axis placed over the collapsed wall fall and aligned adjacent to the northwest interior wall and oriented along the same axis as the previously excavated Tl to the southeast (see Figure 26). Previous testing within the enclosure recovered only charcoal so the unit size is designed to maximize the potential to recover associated cultural material. The proposed unit layout is designed to document the stratigraphic relationship of the enclosure wall, the collapsed wall fall and the underlying deposits. Site 25745 No additional excavation is proposed for this permanent habitation platform, based on the re- sults of substantial test excavations during the inventory survey that recovered diverse cultural materi- al. Cultural material recovered during the inventory phase from T-1, T-2 and T-3 will be used to ana- lyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function(see Figure 27). Site 25746 No additional excavation is proposed for this temporary habitation lava tube,based on the re- sults of sufficient data acquired from test excavations during the inventory survey that recovered di- verse cultural material. Cultural material recovered during the inventory phase from two test units ex- cavated just inside the entrance will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function (see Figure 28). The exact location of the test units were not plotted on the site map produced by Hammatt et al.(1987). Site 25747 No additional excavation is proposed for this temporary habitation lava tube,based on the re- sults of sufficient data acquired from test excavations during the inventory survey that recovered di- verse cultural material. Cultural material recovered during the inventory phase from three test units excavated just inside the entrance will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function(see Figure 29). Site 25748 Data recovery at this permanent habitation complex will be focused on five features that were not tested during the inventory survey(Features D, E, 1, K,and L).Cultural material previously recov- 54 ered from the tested features(A,C, F, H and J) will be used to analyze activities associated with fea- ture use and to interpret feature function(see Figure 30). Data recovery in the Feature D enclosure will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m unit placed against the interior in the area of potentially deepest soil. The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the wall, the enclosure floor and the underlying deposits. Excavation will focus on determining whether one or more living surfaces are discernible in the stratigraphic profile. Data recovery in the Feature E mound will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m unit placed in the center of the feature to determine whether it marks the location of a sealed lava blister or burial. Data recovery in the Feature I enclosure will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m unit placed in the southeast corner of the feature, partially over the enclosure walls and partially over the unpaved interior floor. The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the two walls, the enclosure floor and the underlying deposits. Excavation will focus on determining whether one or more living surfaces are discernible in the stratigraphic profile. Data recovery in the Feature K terrace will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m unit placed in the northwest corner of the feature, adjacent to the intersection of the retaining walls and over the unpaved terrace surface. The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the retaining walls, the terrace occupation surface and the underlying deposits. Excavation will focus on determining whether one or more living surfaces are discernible in the stratigraphic profile. Data recovery in the Feature L terrace will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 m unit placed in the northeast corner of the feature,adjacent to the intersection of the retaining walls and over the unpaved terrace surface,and immediately west-southwest of the excavation unit in Feature K. The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the retaining walls, the terrace occupation surface and the underlying deposits. Excavation will focus on determining whether one or more living surfaces are discernible in the stratigraphic profile. Site 25750 Data recovery at this permanent habitation walled terrace will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 2.0 m unit. The unit will be placed predominantly over the level soil deposit in the central por- tion of the structure (see Figure 31). The long axis of the unit will be oriented northeast-southwest and the northeast edge of the unit will be placed against the southwest face of the pahoehoe knoll. The southwest portion of the unit will be placed over the terrace wall.The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the terrace wall, the terrace occupation surface and the underlying de- posits. Site 25752 No additional excavation is proposed for this permanent habitation terrace, based on the re- sults of sufficient data acquired from test excavations during the inventory survey that recovered vol- canic glass debitage and sparse midden debris. Cultural material recovered from TU-9 during the in- ventory survey will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function(see Figure 32). Site 25753 The data recovery at this permanent habitation complex will be comprised of excavations at ten of the 22 features(A 1,A2,Cl, C2, I, J, K 1, K2, L and M). The other features at the site were ei- ther previously subjected to subsurface (9 features) examination or exhibit limited potential for data recovery(3 features).Cultural material previously recovered from the tested features(B,D,E,F,G,H, 55 N1, N2, O)will be used to analyze activities associated with feature use and to interpret feature function (see Figure 33). Data recovery in the Feature A 1 terrace will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit placed over the unpaved terrace surface in the southwest interior corner,to the left of the gap in the south retaining wall. The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the west and south retaining walls, the terrace occupation surface and the underlying deposits. Data recovery in the Feature A2 walled terrace will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit placed over the unpaved terrace surface in the southeast interior corner,against the south and east retaining walls. The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the east and south retaining walls, the terrace occupation surface and the underlying deposits. Data recovery in the Feature C1 enclosure will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit placed in the southwest interior corner,to the left of the gap in the south wall.The unit profiles will docu- ment the stratigraphic relationship of the west and south walls, the enclosure occupation surface and the underlying deposits. Data recovery in the Feature C2 pavement will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit placed in the center of the pavement. Data recovery in the Feature I enclosure will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit placed against any interior wall where soil deposition appears to be deepest. The unit profiles will docu- ment the stratigraphic relationship of the enclosure wall,the enclosure occupation surface and the underly- ing deposits. Data recovery in the Feature J enclosure will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit placed against any interior wall where soil deposition appears to be deepest. The unit profiles will docu- ment the stratigraphic relationship of the enclosure wall,the enclosure occupation surface and the underly- ing deposits. Data recovery in the Feature KI enclosure will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit placed against any interior wall where soil deposition appears to be deepest. The unit profiles will docu- ment the stratigraphic relationship of the enclosure wall,the enclosure occupation surface and the underly- ing deposits. Data recovery in the Feature K2 enclosure will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit placed against the interior wall where soil deposition appears to be deepest.The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the enclosure wall, the enclosure occupation surface and the underlying deposits. Data recovery in the Feature L terrace and adjoining enclosure will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit placed in the soil fill depression in the enclosure constructed on the west side of the fea- ture. The unit will be placed against one wall so that the unit profiles can document the stratigraphic rela- tionship of the enclosure wall,the enclosure occupation surface and the underlying deposits. Data recovery in the Feature M platform will consist of the excavation of a 1.0 by 1.0 in unit placed in the approximate center of the feature so that the unit samples both the upper tier and lower tier deposits.The unit profiles will document the stratigraphic relationship of the tiers and the underlying depo- sits. Site 25757 Data recovery efforts at this site will consist of the mechanical excavation of three trenches to bi- sect one kua'iwi and two terraces.The kua'iwi within the site vary from 1.2 to 2.5 in in width and from 0.4 to 1.2 in in height,and are interpreted as garden boundaries. Two of the widest and highest kua'iwi within this complex are Features AMN and AOV that are 2.5 in wide and 1.0 to 1.2 in in height. Backhoe trench- 56 ing will bisect the short axis of either AMN or AOV to obtain carbon samples that would allow construc- tion of the kua`twi to be dated. There are 19 agricultural terraces within the Site 25757 complex. These functioned to retain level or slightly sloping soil for gardening.The terraces vary from 3.1 to 37.2 in in length and from 1.0 to 4.0 in in width.The upslope side of these features range in height from 0.0 to 0.3 in and the downslope sides vary from 0.5 to 1.5 in. The retaining walls are constructed of piled cobbles and small boulders (n=12) or of stacked and piled cobbles and small boulders. The retaining wall of one is constructed of stacked stones and exhibits remnant facing and a roughly paved surface(Feature AKX).The Feature AKX was tested dur- ing the inventory survey, but no cultural material was recovered. Four terrace retaining walls are greater than 1.0 in in height(Features AG, EK, JP and YH).Two of these more substantially constructed terraces will be bisected by backhoe trenches that originate inland of the retaining wall,extend through the retaining wall,and terminate downslope of the retaining wall. Stratigraphic profiles of the backhoe trenches will de- pict the relationship of the retaining walls to the underlying soils and bedrock. All cultural material col- lected from the trench profiles will be plotted on the trench profiles. Methodology Excavation units dug during data recovery will be excavated in arbitrary levels within stratigraphic layers and will be excavated to bedrock. All excavated fill will be passed through 1/8 inch mesh screen. Standardized excavation records will be prepared after the completion of each stratigraphic layer. Portable remains collected will be placed in paper bags labeled with the appropriate provenience information. Re- covered charcoal samples from either the excavations or from the surface of the sites will be deposited in aluminum foil pouches and placed in properly labeled paper bags. Following the excavations,section draw- ings depicting the stratigraphy will be prepared,and post-excavation photographs will be taken. Recovered cultural remains will then be transported to Haim&Associates'office for analysis. The trenches undertaken during the data recovery efforts will be mechanically excavated. The backhoe trench wall stratigraphy will be documented graphically with line-drawn sections,described using standard USDA Soil Survey descriptions and Munsell colors, and photographed. The stratigraphy will be analyzed to identify strata associated with the terraces and pre-terrace deposits. Sample collection will fo- cus on obtaining charcoal for radiocarbon dating from the exposed trench walls, or by screening strata fill. Ideally,samples will be obtained from multiple strata in each trench to permit dating the pre-terrace depo- sits and strata spanning the use of these features. A representative sample of any artifacts or food remains visible in the trench walls will be collected. Laboratory analysis will consist of evaluating charcoal samples for dating and analysis of all re- covered artifacts and food remains. Dating sample selection will emphasize single fragments of charcoal to minimize contamination by fragments of varying ages. Burned kukui nutshell will be selected for dating if available. Otherwise, fragments representing intact sections of small tree and shrub stems will be used to minimize intra-sample variation in wood age.Charcoal samples will be submitted to Beta Analytic,Inc. for radiocarbon dating. Stable isotope ratios(C13/12)will also be determined. A maximum of 12 samples will be submitted for AMS dating. A final report on the data recovery work will be prepared and submitted for DLNR-SHPD review and acceptance.The report will,at a minimum,contain all elements required in DLNR-SHPD Rules Chap- ter 13-2784. The report will be submitted within one year after completion of fieldwork. All recovered materials and records will be temporarily curated at the Haun & Associates office. Following completion and acceptance of the data recovery report,arrangements for permanent curation will be determined in con- sultation with DLNR-SHPD and the landowner. If human remains are encountered during data recovery investigations, then the remains will be treated following the procedures outlined in Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 6E43. Work in the area of the discovery will be halted, the remains stabilized if necessary, and DLNR-SHPD contacted for guidance. 57 REFERENCES Cordy, R. 1981 A Study of Prehistoric Social Change: The Development of Complex Societies in the Ha- waiian Islands.Academic Press,New York. DLNR(Department of Land and Natural Resources) 2003 Hawaii Administrative Rules,Title 13, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Sub- title 13,State Historic Preservation Division Rules. Hammatt,H.,D. Borthwick,and D.Shideler 1987 Archaeological Survey,Testing and Excavations of a 32-acre parcel, Kapalaalaea, Kona, Hawaii Island.Cultural Surveys Hawaii prepared for First Investment Corp.,Ltd. Haun,A.,and D.Henry 2006a Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK: 3-7-7-08:121, Land of Kapala`alaea 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Haun & Associates Report 422-092005 prepared for Clark Realty Corporation. 2006b Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK: 3-7-7-08:105, 113, Land of Kapala`alaea 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Haun & Associates Report 476-112806 prepared for Kona Heights,LLC. Haun,A.E.,D.Henry and D.M.Berrigan 2003a Archaeological Data Recovery, Sites 5748, 5749, 5750, 5753, 5755, 5756, 5761, 5762, 5764,5771,and 5774,Pu'uhonua Subdivision Parcel,Land of Kalaoa 5,North Kona Dis- trict,Island of Hawai'i (TMK:3-7-3-10:Por 27). Haun,A.E.,D.Henry and D.M. Berrigan 2003b Archaeological Data Recovery Sites 22946,22949,22951,22952,and 22955, Lands of Hienaloli 2-5,North Kona District,Island of Hawai'i,TMK:7-5-10:52,65, 66. Prepared by Haun&Associates(Report 110-042503)for Bolton,Inc.,Kailua-Kona. Haun,A.E.,D.Henry and D.M.Berrigan 2003c Archaeological Data Recovery Sites 22764 and 22780 Land of Kahalui 1 &2,North Ko- na District, Island of Hawai'i, TMK: 7-5-16:15, 16, 17, 29. Prepared by Haun & Asso- ciates(Report 109-060703)for Bolton,Inc.,Kailua-Kona. 58 Mitchell D.Roth Mayor . ..... Rarnzi I. Mansour Director Lee E. Lord', Managing Director of iA Brenda D. lokepa-Moses Deputy Director County of Hawaii DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 345 Kekuan5o'a Street,Suite 41 - Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Ph:(808)961-8083 - Fax: (808)961-8086 Email: cohdem@hawaiicounty.gov MEMORANDUM TO: Zendo Kern, Director Planning Department FROM: Ramzi I. Mansour, DirCto 3t1Vh-y%k---Z Department of Environmental Management DATE: February 3, 2022 SUBJECT: Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09-008 (REZ-07-000075) Change of Zone Application(PL-REZ-2022-000014) Applicant: Hawaii Onel Investors, LLC (formerly Kona Heights, LLC) Request: Five (5) Year Time Extension to Condition E (Time to Secure Final Subdivision Approval) and Amendment to Condition K (Allow for Additional Forms of Surety to Secure a Subdivision Agreement) Tax Map Key: (3) 7-7-008:121 The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Solid Waste Division for details): (X ) No comments. Commercial operations, State and Federal agencies, religious entities and non-profit organization may not use transfer stations for disposal. Aggregates and any other construction/demolition waste should be responsibly reused to its fullest extent. Ample and equal room should be provided for rubbish and recycling. Green waste may be transported to the green waste sites located at the West Hawaii Organics Facility and East Hawaii Organics Facility, or other suitable diversion programs. Construction and demolition waste is prohibited at all County Transfer Stations. Submit Solid Waste Management Plan in accordance with attached guidelines. Existing Solid Waste Management Plan is to be followed. Provide-update to the department on current status. Other: Planning Dept. County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer Exhibit 4 Ramzn i. Mansour, Director February 3, 2022 Page 2 The Wastewater Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Wastewater Division for details): No comments. ( ) Require connection of existing and/or proposed structures to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 of the Hawaii County Code. ( ) Require Council Resolution to approve sewer extension in accordance with Section 21- 26.1 of the Hawaii County Code. Complete Sewer Extension Application.. (X) Require extension of the sewer system to service the:proposed subdivision in accordance with Section 23-85 of the Hawaii County Code. ( ) Check or line out as applicable: [ ] 1f required by the Director of the Department of Environmental Management ("Director of DEM"), [ ] applicant shall conduct a sewer study in accordance with the applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. Contact Wastewater Division Chief for details. ( ) Proposed activity may be subject to existing or future federal, state, or county regulation under Title 40 CFR 403.5, prohibiting discharge of certain pollutants into publicly owned treatment works. Contact the Hawaii Department of Health for information regarding pretreatment standards. { ) Applicant shall follow Department of Health regulations due to no County sewer system in area. ( ) Other: RML :pIs 2 w�Trsg Sw ytj 1. DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY • COUNTY OF HAWAII G`a,`� ._.„...• h�� 345 KEKUANAO'ASTREET, SMITE 20 • HILO, HAWAII 96720 TELEPHONE(808)961-8050 • FAX(808)961-8657 February 28, 2022 CpH PLANNING DEPT MAR 12022 PM2:19 RECD HAND DELIVERED TO: Mr. Zendo Kern, Director Planning Department FROM: Kcith K. Okamoto, Manager-Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09-008 (REZ-07-000075) Change of Zone Application (PL-REZ-2022-000014) Applicant: Hawaii Onel Investors, LLC (formerly Kona Heights, LLC) Request: Five (5) Year Time Extension to Condition E (Time to Secure Final Subdivision Approval) and Amendment to Condition K (Allow for Additional Formas of Surety to Secure a Subdivision Agreement) Tax Map Key (3) 7-7-008:121 We have reviewed the subject request and have no objection to a 5-year time extension. Please be informed that the applicant has an existing water commitment in effect as stated in the applicant's documentation. Our conditions stated in our February 11, 2022, letter to the applicant, and copied to your department, stili stand. Construction plans will need to be re-submitted for re-approval. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at (808) 961-8070, extension 256. Sincerely yours, �"/Vwy+ Keith K. Okamoto, P.E. Manager-Chief Engineer RQ:dfg copy — Hawaii One 1 Investors, LLC Mr. Daryn Arai, Land Use Planning Consultant Planning Dept. Water, Our Most lTrecious lZesource. . . Xa Wai_A ane. . . Exhibit 5 The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer. Oq WATER3 4 yi Cp 19 t�9 ` DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY COUNTY OF HAWAII •�` `���w Qr 345 KEKUANAO`A STREET, SUITE 20 HILO, HAWAI'i 96720 TELEPHONE(808)961-8050 - FAX(808)961-8657 February 11, 2022 COH PLANNING DEIN FEB 14 2022 PM2:30 Mr. Matt Mansi ITEC°D HAND DELIVERED Aldersgate investment, LLC 300 East Esplanade Drive, Suite 1550 Oxnard,CA 93036 Dear Mr. Mansi: Subject: Water Commitment Time Extension "La`ipala Makai Development" Change of Zone Application No.REZ-07-000075 Tax Map Key 7-7-008:121 This is to acknowledge receipt of the required $14,700.00 water commitment deposit for the subject application. We are enclosing Receipt No.4913426 for your files. Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Department's Rules and Regulations, a water commitment time extension for the proposed 50-lot development in the amount of 19,600 gallons per day,or 49 additional units of water at an average of 400 gallons per day, per unit, is hereby granted until June 30, 2023, with the following conditions: 1. Construct necessary water system improvements, which shall include, but not be limited to: a, water mains capable of delivering water at adequate pressure and volume under peak-flow and fire-flow conditions; minimum diameter of mains shall be 8-inches, b. service laterals that will accommodate a 518-inch meter to each lot and located to front each lot, c. fire hydrants spaced no more than 600 feet apart and within 300 feet of the driveway or access for each lot. On dead-end streets,the last fire hydrant shall be located at one-half the distance from the last house, or unit, fronting the property line.or to the driveway or access for the property, and d. subject to other agencies' requirements to construct improvements within the road right-of-way fronting the property affected by the proposed development,the applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of the Department's affected water system facilities, should they be necessary. Submit construction plans prepared by a professional engineer, licensed in the State of Hawaii, for review and approval. Planning Dept. Water, Our Most(Precious resource . . . X,a Wai,4 Kine . . . Exhibit.-- 5 The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and amployer. Mr. Matt Mansi Page 2 February 11, 2022 2. Remit the prevailing facilities charge, which is subject to change,as shown below: FACILITIES CHARGE(FC): I` service for the subject parcel $1,319.00 49 additional units 5 095.00/unit $298,655.00 Total FC $299,974,00 WATER COMMITMENT DEPOSIT CREDIT(WCD): 49 additional units a1 150.001unit aid six b times q44 100.04 Total Amount $255,874.00 These are due and payable upon completion of the installation of the required water system improvements and prior to final subdivision approval being granted. For your information, water commitment deposits are credited towards the final facilities requirement for the development. Note that the atnount of water commitment deposit may exceed the prevailing facilities charge amount; for example, when requests for time extensions continue and are approved. Until the development is finally completed,these are separate and unrelated items. In the event that water commitment deposits exceed the facilities charge, no refunds are applicable. 3. Subm it the appropriate documents, properly prepared and executed, to convey the water system improvements and necessary easements to the Water Board of the County of Hawaii prior to final subdivision approval being granted. A registered land surveyor shall stamp and certify the metes and bounds description within the conveyance documents. However, prior to water meter services being granted to the development,or any lots within,the conveyance documents shall be accepted by the Water Board. 4. Comply with all other applicable policies and requirements of the Department's Rules and Regulations. Noncompliance may be cause for voiding this water commitment,at which time availability will be subject to change in accordance with prevailing water system conditions, policies,and Rules and Regulations. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at(808)961-8070,extension 256. Sincerely yours, "/VA Keith K. Okamoto, P.E. Manager-Chief Engineer RQ:dfg Enc. copy— Planning Department Carlsmith Ball LLP Mori, Ashley From: Henderson, Royd Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 9:33 AM To: Planning Internet Mail Cc: Araujo, Jaclyn Subject: SMA Use Permit Amendment Application No. PL-SMA-2022-000012 for Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC on TMK: (3) 7-7-008:121 To whom it may concern, The Fire Department will require the subdivision to design according to the following codes: Fire Department Access and Water Supply shall comply with Chapter 18, Hawaii State Fire Code and Chapter 26, Hawaii county Code. HFD. Thank you for your time and consideration. Royd Royd Henderson Fire Prevention Inspector II Hawaii Fire Department Prevention Bureau (808) 937-7867 Planning Depi. 1 Exhibit. . .... "q~ STATE OF HAWAII y °'���� v", DAVID Y.IGE OFFICE OF PLANNING GOVERNOR MARY ALICE EVANS o° & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR °°•° yah 235 South Beretania Street,6th Floor, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Telephone: (808)587-2846 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2359, Honolulu, Hawaii 96804 Fax: (808)587-2824 Web: https://planning.hawaii.gov/ Coastal Zone DTS 202202021103NA Management Program February 17, 2022 Environmental Review Program Land Use Mr. Zendo Kern, Director Commission Department of Planning County of Hawaii Land Use Division East Hawaii Office Special Plans 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Branch Hilo, Hawaii 96720 State Transit- Oriented Attn: Mr. Christian Kay Development Statewide Geographic Dear Mr. Kern: Information System Subject: Request for Time Extension and Amendment to Allow Use of a Surety Statewide i ff I bdi d S i Rg Chane of Zone or Required Improvements affecting Sustainability Branch fq p g Ordinance No. 098 (REZ 07-000075) and Special Management Area Use Permit(SMA 07-000024), North Kona, Hawaii; Tax Map Key: (3) 7-7-008: 121 Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the subject SMA use request(PL-SMA-2022-000012) for time extension, transmitted via memorandum dated February 1, 2022. According to the application package provided, Hawaii Onel Investors, LLC, is requesting to amend the above-referenced ordinance (REZ 07-000075) and permit(SMA 07-000024)to allow for additional time by which to complete the proposed 62-lot single-family residential subdivision, and to provide flexibility in the type of surety to be used to ensure completion of required subdivision improvements and to secure Final Subdivision Approval. Details in the subject application are as follows: o Both the Change of Zoning Ordinance and SMA Use Permit in support of the proposed subdivision were approved in 2009 o Condition E of the Change of Zone Ordinance and Condition 4 of the SMA Use Permit both required completion of the proposed subdivision development within five years of its effective date, February 9, 2014 Planning Dept. Exhibit 7 Mr. Zendo Kern February 17, 2022 Page 2 o Pursuant to Condition Y of the Change of Zone Ordinance and Condition 15 of the SMA Use Permit respectively, an administrative time extension to February 9, 2019, was approved by the Planning Director by letter dated July 24, 2014 o A Request for an additional 5-year extension to February 9, 2024, by which to complete construction of the 62-lot single family subdivision as originally set forth in Condition E of the Change of Zoning Ordinance and Condition 4 of the SMA Use Permit The OPSD has reviewed the subject SMA Use Permit Application, and has the following comments to offer: 1. The OPSD has no position on a time extension for a SMA use permit, which shall follow the administrative requirements of County SMA rules. Please note that the granting of a time extension shall not be contrary to the Zoning Code, and to the original reasons for granting the subject SMA use permit. 2. The proposed amendment from the request to add"or secured by a bond or other acceptable forms of surety' to Condition K of the Change of Zoning Ordinance No. 098 may set a precedent for looser conditions in the future for other Changes of Zoning Ordinance for completion of all required improvements and utilities by the deadline. If you have any questions regarding this comment letter,please contact Shichao Li of our office at(808) 587-2841, or by email at shichao.li@hawaii.gov. Sincerely, Mary Alice Evans Director DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/Russell Y. Tsuji Ref: Special Management Area Use Permit Application (PL-SMA-2022-000012) (Amend SMA 07-000024)— Request for Five (5)Year Time Extension to Condition 4 (Time to Secure Final Subdivision Approval) Location: North Kona, Island of Hawaii TMK(s): (3) 7-7-008:121 Applicant: County of Hawaii on behalf of Hawaii 0nel Investors,Ll-C (formerly Kona Heights, LLC) COMMENTS The rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44CFR), are in effect when development falls within a Special Flood Hazard Area(high-risk areas). Be advised that 44CFR, Chapter 1, Subchapter B, Part 60 reflects the minimum standards as set forth by the NFIP. Local community flood ordinances may stipulate higher standards that can be more restrictive and would take precedence over the minimum NFIP standards. The owner of the project property and/or their representative is responsible to research the Flood Hazard Zone designation for the project. Flood zones subject to NFIP requirements are identified on FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), The official FIRMS can be accessed through FEMA's Map Service Center(msc.fema.gov). Our Flood Hazard Assessment Tool (FHAT) (http://gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHAT) could also be used to research flood hazard information. If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances,please contact the applicable County NFIP coordinating agency below: a Oahu: City and County of Honolulu, Department of Planning and Permitting (808) 7688098. a Hawaii Island: County of Hawaii,Department of Public Works (808) 961-8327. o Maui/Molokai/Lanai County of Maui, Department of Planning (808) 270-7139. o Kauai: County of Kauai,Department of Public Works (808) 241-4849. Signed: C ARTY S. CHANG, CHIEF ENGINEER Date: Feb 28, 2022 Planning Dept. Exhibit 8 Mori, Ashley From: Douglas Stephens <doug@stephensrealty.biz> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 3:40 PM To: Planning Internet Mail Cc: Carol Stephens Subject: SMA Use Permit 07-000024 Dear West Hawaii Planning Dept. We are in receipt of a copy of a request for extension for the above-captioned project. We own a home located just north of the proposed project. My daughter and her daughter live on Nanaloa Drive. We are very much in opposition to the requested time extension for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has had several years to complete this project; they certainly have had time to obtain "surety" for the project, if they are capable. 2. Our concerns (and those of neighbors) have never been addressed regarding the effect of additional traffic on the adjoining residential streets, especially Nanaloa. 3. Has the fire department approved of the project? Copies of the letter we received are attached. Stephens-Hawaii Properties, by- Douglas Stephens, Managing Partner Should you need to contact me for any reason here is my contact info: Douglas Stephens Email: doug@stephensrealty.biz Phone: 209-581-2772. Planning Dept. 1 Exhibit^ Y Daryn Arai Land Use Planning Consultant Dear Neighbors, Notice of Filing for Amendments to Ordinance 09 8 and SMA Use Permit 07-000024 Applicant: Hawaii Onel Investors, LLC Requests: Five(5)year time extension to secure Final Subdivision Approval of Proposed 62-lot single family residential subdivision and allow flexibility on types of surety to ensure completion of required subdivision improvements Affected Property: TNM-7-7-008:121, Kapala`alaea 2°d,North Kona,Hawaii On behalf of the Applicant and landowner, Hawaii Onel Investors, LLC and in accordance with the requirements of Section 25-2-4 of the Hawaii County Code,this letter will serve notice that on January 7,2022, the Applicant filed requests with the Planning Department seeking a five(5)year time extension by which to complete construction of the proposed 62-lot single family residential subdivision known as La`ipala Makai Subdivision,as required by Condition E of Ordinance No. 09 8 and Condition 4 of SMA Use Permit No. 0-000024. Also being requested is an amendment to Condition K of Ordinance No. 09 8 to provide flexibility in the type of surety to be used to ensure completion of required subdivision improvements and to secure Final Subdivision Approval. The proposed La`ipala Makai Subdivision project site consists of approximately 11.05 acres and identified by TMK: 7-7-008:121. The property is located mauka of Alii Drive, immediately adjacent to the south of Keauhou View Estates and White Sands Beach subdivisions and bordered to the east(mauka) of the proposed Kahului-Keauhou Parkway in Kapala`alaea 2, North Kona, Hawaii (Figure 1-Location Man). Also included is a Phase 1 map showing the proposed subdivision layout(Figure 2-La`ipala Makai Phase I Subdivision Plat Map). As a landowner situated within 300 feet of the project site, another similar notice like this will later be sent to you informing you of the date, time and place of a hearing on this application before the Leeward Planning Commission, where you may wish to provide testimony on this application. Should you be interested, a copy of these requests can be viewed at the Planning Department offices located in both East and West Hawaii. Should you have any questions regarding this application, or wish to submit written testimony to the Planning Director and/or the Leeward Planning Commission in advance of the public hearing,we offer the contact information for the Planning Department as follows: Planning Department(Hilo Office) Planning Department(West Hawaii office) 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway Hilo,HI 96720 Building E, 21d Floor Phone: (808) 961-8288 Kailua-Kona,HI 96740 Email: planning@hawaiicoun1y.gov Phone: (808) 323-4770 P.O.BOX 4501,HILO HAWAII 96720 PHONE(808)895-3218 EMAIL:DARYN.ARAI@OUTLOOK.COM Should you have any questions regarding these amendment requests, also feel free to contact nye by phone at (808) 895-31218 or by email at Dai-yn.A,aai(«?outlook.coni. Sincerely, ZDaryn Arai Land Use Planning Consultant iAKOW 1i ICAtw r 9t 5'? w ; r , .... ,� , � tA liop ESTA r j . P"�ROJ1:� i 7 i Figure l —Location.Map 1 . J PH4SE[ ) $r CD s j r N, N { � r�J f t �! j�_: � ��� .� �• ��.. > —.._ wr uwuurr .��znesum cr ruw.rw wp(S 0�15�>A A-4 RBIm1r(.WN Illl{I ` ' Y .to.�S �^ M9 QISLWlp4p'La91flMS'ID-Y 1D'ID-fi',v.Y1LShL. pf � t-. r� � IAIItQM'6-,4W'II.W C.fdP4'4S-,btP AREA= 11444 ACRES CD ,Dtaacr.roirtxe.m Gulvq w ro4ua a..¢rowaY r, - a m^m4[N'ory 9Y416 'f i aNs f0 n. t-.•. ... ... ' - x •• •t raf r¢5 7.7. " R ' i n SDt tart r ' i n. y y� � e/ � �> �y ��� Kay, Christian From: info golfbykids.org <info@golfbykids.org> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 8:31 AM To: LPCtestimony Cc: info golfbykids.org Subject: TMK -7-7-008:121: Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC (PL-REZ-2022-014 & PL-SMA-2022-012) Regarding meeting per below. Oaryn Arad Lard Liu Plmngnli CamuIt"t March 31.2022 -—� bear Neighbors. Notice of Ife;mng baton,Lceward Planning Commission regarding Amendments to Ordinance 09 8 and SMA Use Permit 07-906029 Applicant: Hawaii Owl investors.LLC Requests:Five(5)year lime extension to secure Final Subdivision Approval of Proposed 62-lot single fami lv residential subdivision and allow flexibility on types of surety to ensure completion of required subdivision improvemcn ffretcd Pmm A [Uy TMK-7-7-008:121:Kanola•elaea 2" North,Kona,fiawai• On behalf of the Applicant and landowner,Hawaii Unel lnveators,LLC and in accordance with clic requimmenis of Section 25-2.4 of the Hawaii County Code,this{ct[er[vi serve notice to you rcgardi ng a meeling to be held on the ahovc-described matters by the La cerd Plafuting Coin mission beginning at 2•30a m on Thu L5day.Aril 21,2022.You ma- look for the agendo at this link: - hoQs:;,'rcQords.haUiJycnPntv.eovirvehlinkl$rovwc,ea�x7dbid=]&stanid=9{10&tr 3 This meeting will he held by interw ivc video con ferencc via Zoom. To provide live orallvideo testimony during this Oil Nne meeting,you mus[register in advance by wmacting Noriko Sauer by email at Noriko.S-t cr n7hawaii [ ov or talk her at(81781 333.4783 av 1 than 4:36pm an Tuesday,April 19,2622. Additionally,the Wcst ffawaii Civic Center,Community Center,Building G.74-! Am 1Ceoboldlole Highway,Kailus-Kona,Hawaii,will be open to the public as the in-per meeting location at the same date and time disclosed above. You may also observe this meeting by vicwi ng a 11 fe stream ou Y—Tube at; h[tp5:Ilwww.youlubc.colnlcllanncl.+tiCAPoRblb3rfWLQMI'd61'AkEGA?view a subscribe_ Written teslillto)'can be submitted via entail at LYClestimony@hawaiicounty.gov o; hardcopy delivered to the Hilo or Kona Planning Departmems no later 4i' pm on Tuesday, April 19,2022. As you may recall,we previously served you with notice that on January 7,2022,the Applicant filed requests with the Planning Department seeking a five(5)year lima extcn3ior which to complete construction of the proposed 62-lot single family residential subdivision known as t.a'ipala Makai Subdivision,as required by Condition E of Ordinance No.09 8 as Condition 4 0l SMA Use Pemril No.0--000024. Also being requested is an arru-ndment to Condition K of Ordinance Nu.09 8 to provide flexibility in the type of surety W be used to ensure completion of required subdivision improvements arab to secure Final Subdivision Approval, 1'<�It:lxaspl,Illl,f)l EV1I'.111 96120 Pllr 1�'1::Iwrsj 89S]?18 I'.1f.i II.t111t7'N.51G11�e;U11'17.L)[1lCf;[]:�I I am a homeowner living at 77-198 Hookaana Street. I bought my existing single family in Mar 2021 and for the past year have been living in Kailua-Kona and observing the traffic patterns. Planning Dept. 1 Exhibit- 10 There is not enough Street capacity to support further development here. Already we have bumper to bumper traffic many times during the day on both roads accessing town. More homes mean more traffic and places pedestrians using the roads in greater danger. Beyond that there are difficult issues around waste disposal, demand for potable water and sewage processing. There has to be a limit to development to preserve the very special place we have here. Developers make their profits and don't care about the consequences on existing residents. I VOTE NO on granting the extension. SINCERELY, ROBERT BROWN 77-198 HOOKAANA STREET 2 Daryn Arai Land Use Planning Consultant April 7, 2022 Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Director Kern: Subj ect: Response to Agencies' comments regarding Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09-008 (REZ-07-000075) Change of Zone Application (PL-REZ-2022-000014) and Special Management Area Use Permit Application (PL-SMA-2022-000012) (Amend SMA-07-000024) Applicant: Hawaii Onel Investors, LLC (formerly Kona Heights, LLC) TMK: 7-7-008:121, Kapala`alaea 2"d, North Kona, Hawaii This letter will respond to comments received from consulting agencies that have reviewed the above-described amendment request. We appreciate these agencies' comments being provided to the Applicant. As the comments between both amendment requests are largely duplicative, we will attempt to consolidate our responses. State Office of Planning& Sustainable Development(letter dated February 17, 2022) The department took no position regarding the 5-year time extension to the SMA Permit by which to complete the proposed subdivision, aside from noting that the granting of the time extension shall not be contrary to the Zoning Code and the original reasons for granting of the SMA Use Permit, which the Applicant has comprehensively addressed as part of its submittal within Section VII- Justification of Request. The Applicant finds that granting of the time extensions to both the change of zone ordinance and the SMA Use Permit will allow for the completion of the proposed subdivision in a manner that the County Council and the Leeward Planning Commission both supported in 2009. Land use policies in the affected area remains the same as it did in 2009 and the Applicant continues to comply with all conditions set forth by both the Planning Commission and the County Council. P.O.BOX 4501,HILO HAWAII 96720 Planning Dept. 808)895-3218 EMAIL:DARYN ARAI@OUTLOOK.COM Exhibit 11 Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director Page 2 of 4 April 7, 2022 Regarding the department's concerns about the Applicant's request to amend Condition K of the rezoning ordinance to allow for other acceptable forms of surety to secure a subdivision agreement"...may set a precedent for looser conditions in the future for other Changes of Zoning Ordinance for completion of all required improvement and utilities by the deadline", the Applicant would like to emphasize that this opportunity to utilize multiple forms of surety already exists under the Subdivision Code as recited below: Section 23-83. Bond. (a) The agreement as specified in section 23-82 shall be secured by a good and sufficient surety bond (other than personal surety), certified check or other security acceptable to the director and approved by the corporation counsel, in the sum equal to the cost of all the work required to be done by the subdivider as estimated by the director of public works and the manager, if the subdivision is within the scope of the department of water supply requirements. The surety bond shall be payable to the County and when appropriate to the department of water supply. The bond shall be conditioned upon the faithful performance of any and all work required to be done by the subdivider. The purpose of the Applicant's request to amend Condition K of the change of zone ordinance is because of the excessively restrictive nature of the existing change of zone ordinance that prevents the use of various acceptable forms of surety to secure a subdivision agreement that is typically afforded to all other subdividers. Department of Health (memo dated February 25, 2022) The Department of Health had no comments to offer on either amendment requests, but did reference a December 13, 2007 letter to the Planning Department which only stated the following: "The submittals for the subject development have been transmitted to our Environmental Management programs for their coordinated review and comments. Upon receipt of their reply, their comments will e forwarded to your office." A review of the entire file did not identify any subsequent comments from the Department of Health. Department of Land and Natural Resources (letter dated February 28, 2022) We note that the Land Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources had no comments regarding either of the amendment requests. Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director Page 3 of 4 April 7, 2022 Department of Land and Natural Resources-Engineering (memo dated February 3, 2022) The department reminds the Applicant to comply with applicable Federal, State and County floodplain requirements. A DPW-approved site drainage plan was submitted in conjunction with the review and subsequent approval of the subdivision construction drawings approved by the County on February 13, 2019. All required drainage systems will be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Public Works and applicable FEMA requirements. Department of Water Supply((letter dated February 28, 2022) The Department of Water Supply (DWS) had no objections to granting of 5-year time extensions to both the change of zone ordinance and the SMA Use Permit in order to allow for the completion the proposed subdivision and to allow for additional forms of surety to secure a subdivision agreement. The Applicant will comply with all of the requirements specified by the DWS letter dated February 11, 2022 as will seek re-approval of the subdivision construction drawings that were initially approved on February 13, 2019. Please note that the Applicant has paid the required water commitment fees to secure the necessary water commitments that will support the proposed subdivision until June 30, 2023, as confirmed by the DWS in its February 11, 2022 letter. Department of Environmental Management(memo dated February 3, 2022) We note that the Solid Waste Division had no comments to offer regarding the requests. As noted by the Wastewater Division, the proposed subdivision will connect to the County's sewer system and will comply with Section 23-85 of the Subdivision Code regarding installation of sewer lines. The Applicant's engineering consultant, Aina Engineering Inc., prepared a sewer study that was approved by the Department of Environmental Management. It should be noted that on February 13, 2019, the County approved the infrastructure construction plans for the proposed subdivision, which included the sewer system. As such, the system will be constructed in conjunction with the balance of the infrastructure for the proposed subdivision. Department of Public Works (memo dated February 15, 2022) We note that the Department of Public Works had no objections to both amendment requests. Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director Page 4 of 4 April 7, 2022 Fire Department(email dated February 9, 2022) Subdivision construction drawings for the proposed subdivision roadways, water system and fire suppression system were approved by the County on February 13, 2019. These plans, along with the actual construction of the subdivision infrastructure systems, will ensure that access and water supply will comply with Chapter 18 of the Hawaii State Fire Code and Chapter 26 of the Hawaii County Code. Police Department memo dated February 10, 2022) The department has no comments regarding the amendments to the SMA Permit or the change of zone ordinance. We hope that we have adequately responded to comments offered by the respective agencies. Please feel free to contact me should there be any questions or need for additional information. Sincerely, DARYN ARAI Land Use Planning Consultant cc via email: Mr. Matt Mansi, Hawaii One Investors, LLC Mr. Sidney Fuke, Planning Consultant Mr. Ken Van Bergen, Consultant Daryn Arai Land Use Planning Consultant April 7, 2022 Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Director Kern: Subj ect: Response to Douglas Stephens' comments regarding Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 09-008 (REZ-07-000075) Change of Zone Application (PL-REZ-2022-000014) and Special Management Area Use Permit Application (PL-SMA-2022-000012) (Amend SMA-07-000024) Applicant: Hawaii Onel Investors, LLC (formerly Kona Heights, LLC) TMK: 7-7-008:121, Kapala`alaea 2"d, North Kona, Hawaii This letter will respond to comments received by email dated February 21, 2022 from Douglas Stephens of Stephens-Hawaii Properties regarding the above-described amendment requests. Thank you for sharing these comments with the Applicant, which we have recited below along with the Applicant's response: 1. The applicant has had several years to complete this project; they certainly have had time to obtain " surety" for the project, if they are capable. Applicant's response: The purpose of the requested time extensions and amendment to Condition K is to allow the Applicant to seek out an alternative source of funding to ensure the completion of the subdivision improvements required by the Planning Department which was lost in late 2019, which is hampered by the deadlines within the change of zone ordinance and SMA Permit to complete the proposed subdivision by February 19, 2019 and language within Condition K of the zoning ordinance that limits the forms of surety that can be used to ensure completion of required drainage improvements. The original applicant, Kona Heights, LLC, relinquished the subject property through final foreclosure proceedings on August 29, 2012 and the current Applicant, Hawaii One Investors, LLC successfully acquired the subject property on August 1, 2013. Since then, the current Applicant has been diligent and committed in accomplishing much of the"soft" work associated with developing the proposed subdivision, such as: P.O.BOX 4501,HILO HAWAII 96720 (808)895-3218 EMAIL:DARYN ARAI@OUTLOOK.COM Planning Daps. Exhibit ___12 Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director Page 2 of 3 April 7, 2022 a. applying for and securing on February 25, 2016 a Planned Unit Development Permit(PUD 15-000032)from the Planning Department to allow for the creation of a more pedestrian-oriented community; b. prepared and secured approval of a Burial Treatment Plan from the State Historic Preservation Division by letter dated May 8, 2017; C. prepared and secured approval of a archaeological data recovery plan from the State Historic Preservation Division by letter dated October 31, 2017 d. upon issuance of the PUD Permit, submitting a subdivision application and secured Tentative Subdivision Approval on September 19, 2017 and Revised Tentative Subdivision Approval on October 25, 2018; e. prepared and submitted the final subdivision plat maps to the Planning Department which was acknowledged by the department on May 23, 2019; f. prepared and secured an environmental assessment and secured a Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI) on July 12, 2018 from the Department of Public Works to allow for the development of a new 3-acre public neighborhood park at Laaloa Avenue; g. designed plans for the construction of a new public neighborhood park at Laaloa Avenue which was issued Final Plan Approval from the Planning Department on November 1, 2018; and h. designed and secured approval of subdivision infrastructure construction drawings for Phase 1 of the proposed subdivision from the County on February 13, 2019; As demonstrated above, the Applicant has demonstrated is capability in developing the proposed 62-lot subdivision. It simply needs more time and flexibility in pursuing a source of surety that will allow them to secure Final Subdivision Approval. The Applicant purchased the property about 4-1/2 years from when the compliance timeclock began back on February 9, 2009 when the original applicant secured the change of zone and SMA Use Permit that supports the proposed project. 2. Our concerns (and those of neighbors) have never been addressed regarding the effect of additional traffic on the adjoining residential streets, especially Nanaloa [sic]. Mr. Zendo Kern, Planning Director Page 3 of 3 April 7, 2022 The Applicant purchased property adjacent to the project site (TMK: 7-7-008:001), that will be utilized to construct a new access roadway that will provide a direct connection with Alii Drive. This new access roadway secured an SMA Minor Use Permit(SMM 18-000393)for its construction from the Planning Department on July 12, 2018 and was subsequently approved on subdivision plans through the issuance of Amended Tentative Approval on October 25, 2018. Construction drawings for Phase I and this new access road were approved by the Planning Department on February 13, 2019. This new access road will distribute the traffic flow anticipated to be generated by the project so that it mitigates the traffic load onto Naniloa Street. With the new access roadway in mind, the Applicant commissioned SSFM International to prepare an updated Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) dated October 2021 that concluded that the proposed 62-lot subdivision will have little near-term impact upon traffic movements at intersections located within the immediate vicinity provided that signalization of the Alii Drive-Laaloa Avenue intersection may be warranted by 2041 with or without the project. Likewise, widening of Route 11 (Mamalahoa Highway)to accommodate the increase of north and south bound traffic may be necessary and should be monitored for possible installation of traffic signals. Future conditions at these intersections will be influenced by the construction of the Alii Highway and the widening of Route 11, so these intersections should be monitored and improved as deemed necessary 3. Has the fire department approved of the project? All roadways and water systems associated with this project must be approved by the County, which will ensure that Fire Department standards relative to fire apparatus access and fire suppression will be adhered to and completed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Please feel free to contact me should there be any questions or need for additional information. Sincerely, DARYN ARAI Land Use Planning Consultant cc via email: Mr. Matt Mansi, Hawaii One Investors, LLC Mr. Sidney Fuke, Planning Consultant Mr. Ken Van Bergen, Consultant