My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-03-02 TGP AMENDMENT
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-03-02 TGP AMENDMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:46:15 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:46:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
an amendment. So this gives the County Council notice that the comprehensive review has <br />begun; and then the Council can put amendments into the comprehensive review, or propose <br />amendments for the comprehensive review. They would do this by resolution. <br />Then there is some tightening up of timeframes for the Planning Director. The first one is that <br />the Planning Director has whats called a public workshop on the new General Plan, actually <br />well have more than one workshop. But what it says is, and this is the time for the public to <br />weigh in on this before it even gets to the Planning Commission and before it gets to the Council; <br />and this simply says that instead of having a 60-day timeframe after the close of public <br />workshops for the public to submit comments to the Planning Director, theres a 21-day <br />timeframe. Then the next thing that happens is that the amendments that are proposed by the <br />Planning Director and the County Council goes to the Planning Commission. And, again, the <br />timeframe for the Director to do this has been shortened from 60 days to 30 days from the <br />deadline for public comments to submitting it to the Planning Commission. <br />The next real change is in 8; and this actually doesnt significantly change the timeframe for the <br />PlanningCommissiontodealwiththecomprehensivereviewoftheGeneralPlan.Itsstill <br />roughly a 5-month timeframe. But the current ordinance breaks it up into the public hearing <br />portion; and then it says close of public hearing and shall act within -. If you look at the current <br />7 and 8, the current 7 and 8 gives a 90-day time period for the Planning Commission to hold <br />public hearings and then a 60-day time period for the Planning Commission to take a vote and <br />make its recommendation. This close of public hearing thing as people who have been on the <br />Commission a while have noticed is a little bit confusing because of the State Sunshine Law. <br />The Planning Commission continues to hearing public testimony on all agenda items, even <br />though the public hearing has been technically closed. So rather than say the public hearing has <br />closed and then were considering it and then youre still taking public testimony, we just folded <br />the whole timeframe together and said that the Planning Commission will do its review and <br />recommendation in 150 days instead of saying that you have 90 days to do the public hearings <br />and 60 days to make a review and recommendation. So the overall timeframe has not actually <br />changed in this respect. <br />Then theres a change on the next page, on the top of the next page, thats meant to clarify the <br />extent of changes that the County Council can make when these amendments get up to the <br />County Council. And the basic idea here is that the Charter says that all General Plan changes <br />are supposed to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Now what happens at the County <br />Council, clearly the County Council can make wording changes, they could scale back the extent <br />of the map change from, say, covering 100 acres to covering 50 acres, because those are not new <br />amendments or new changes. But we wanted to really give guidance to the scope of changes that <br />can be made at the County Council and make it clear that they cant make a change that has the <br />effect of being a new amendment without sending it back to the Planning Commission for a <br />review. So that covers the changes to -. <br />WOODWARD:Mr. Yuen -. <br />YUEN:Yes? <br />3EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.