My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PD RECOMMENDATION REPORT (PL-SMA-2022-012_Amend SMA-07-024)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
*Background/Recommendation Reports (June 2020-Sept 2022)
>
2022
>
2022-07-21 Leeward
>
Item #6 Hawaii One1 Investors, LLC (formerly Kona Heights, LLC) (PL-SMA-2022-012_Amend SMA-07-024)
>
PD RECOMMENDATION REPORT (PL-SMA-2022-012_Amend SMA-07-024)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2022 12:33:57 PM
Creation date
7/15/2022 2:12:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
paid in full. Furthermore,the applicant has conducted an updated TIAR as required by the <br /> Concurrency section of the Zoning Code and finally, there are two (2) civil <br /> defense sirens in the immediate area, one located in the White Sands Beach Estates <br /> subdivision approximately 1,450 feet to the north from the subject property, and a <br /> second siren located approximately 3,100 feet to the south near Kahalu`u Beach Park. <br /> Based on the preceding,the granting of the requested time extension would not be <br /> contrary to the General Plan, Kona CDP, or the Zoning Code. <br /> The granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original <br /> reasons for the granting of the permit. SMA Permit No. 07-024 was approved by the <br /> Planning Commission with conditions based on the criteria for approving a Special <br /> Management Area Use Permit. Namely, the Planning Commission found that the proposed <br /> project would not create significant adverse impacts upon nearby and immediately <br /> adjacent properties,the project was consistent with the General Plan and the Zoning Code, <br /> the proposed project was consistent with the objective and policies provided by Chapter <br /> 205A, HRS and SMA Guidelines contained in Planning Commission Rule 9, and,with <br /> appropriate mitigation, the proposed project would not have any negative impact on visual <br /> and scenic resources,recreational resources, shoreline and nearshore resources and <br /> archaeological,historical, or cultural resources on the subject parcel. <br /> The scope, design, layout, and phasing of the project approved by the Planning <br /> Commission has not significantly changed since the permit was granted. Granting the time <br /> extension would simply provide the applicant additional time to secure an alternative <br /> funding source and develop the project. Thus, the time extension request is not contrary to <br /> the original reasons for granting the permit. <br /> In view of the Hawai`i State Supreme Court's "PASH" and "Ka Pa`akai O <br /> Ka`Aina"decisions, the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights <br /> must be addressed. These rights must be addressed in terms of the cultural, historical, and <br /> natural resources and the associated traditional and customary practices of the site. <br /> Investigation of valued resources: The applicant has submitted the following <br /> studies from which the Planning Commission can determine the valued natural, cultural, <br /> and historical resources in the project area: <br /> -5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.