Laserfiche WebLink
problems which held up my vote last meeting. And we also have commentary or response from <br />the Police Department which says ‚The deletion of the project access at Kekela Street should <br />. <br />mitigate the traffic safety concerns which were posed by the original site plan So from my <br />own perspective, I would like to forward a, I would be in favor of a favorable recommendation <br />here if it stipulated that there would not be access to Kekela Street in conformance with what the <br />applicant is now presenting before us. But other than that I think I couldnt, rather, I dont feel <br />comfortable just waiting on the whole program to see what comes from the Department of <br />Transportation, in the same way myself and a few others didnt feel comfortable the last time. <br />Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:When I came to this meeting I assumed that we were going to eliminate, I <br />think thats Condition F. Condition F was it? Yeah, I think thats Condition F. But based on <br />what the Director indicated, you know, and hes concerned about whether its practical or not, <br />but he also indicated that the Council has the ability to change conditions here except for the <br />actualzoning.So,youknow,ifyoureinagreement,inmyopinion,ifyoureagreementwith <br />the project itself, even if we eliminated it they could add it back in, etc. So Im not certain that <br />we have full control over that or as much control as youd like to have over that. <br />YUEN:Yeah. You know, I dont feel strongly about, you know, if the <br />Commission wants to take out and say theres no access to Kekela Street. Its true that I hadnt <br />really focused on the left-turn out on Kekela Street and its true that having no access to Kekela <br />Street eliminates that as an issue from the project. There are still left turns from, you know, the <br />other commercial areas. But this is actually a larger commercial area than the one that exists <br />. <br />nowSo, it is considerably larger. I dont have a big problem with it. Then if it turns out that <br />the Puainako only access doesnt work, then they have to come in with an amendment to the <br />rezoning ordinance. <br />GRAHAM:Commissioner Watanabe. <br />WATANABE:Yeah. However, rather than, you know, creating a situation where they <br />may have to come back because we were so specific in our conditions, and especially since we <br />dont presently have the TIAR, I think Id feel pretty comfortable going forward this way. And, <br />you know, there already are people making a left turn from Kekela onto Puainako. Yeah, Im <br />sure the residents are. This may increase it somewhat. But, on the other hand, people tend to <br />avoid difficult left-turns. So it is more likely that they will make a right-turn out of Kekela so <br />that they dont have to, you see what Im saying? The Police Department is concerned if <br />someone is absolutely determined to make a left turn, which is very difficult cause it traverses <br />two lanes; but most people are going to make a right turn because they dont want to be in that <br />difficult situation. And so I think that the problem is going to resolve itself. <br />GRAHAM:I might comment I do have a suggestion from Mr. Torigoe here to try to <br />kind of breach the middle of our issue here in regard to No. F. He suggests perhaps we preface it <br />by saying, ‚No project access from Kekela Street shall be allowed unless recommended by <br />Department of Transportation.ƒ And then it continues, ‚Access from Kekela Street, if any, shall <br />conform to Chapter 22,ƒ etc., as Condition F. <br />WATANABE:I feel comfortable with that as a friendly amendment also. <br />14EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />