My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-03-02 TGINGER02
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-03-02 TGINGER02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:46:21 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:46:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Street is that if you dont, if the customers cant come in from Kekela Street its true then people <br />are not going to turn left off Puainako Street and go into Kekela Street. You can get people that <br />will make a u-turn, etc. It really depends on how attractive the particular, what is developed on <br />the site. But thats the idea behind it, you know, is that people will come up, that the customers, <br />if you dont have access on Kekela Street you wont turn left across Puainako Street to get to this <br />project. People will just come up Kanoelehua. Otherwise, yeah, they will have the opportunity <br />to turn left and then come into the Kekela Street intersection. A u-turn would not be legal at the <br />Kekela Street-Puainako Street intersection <br />DOMING:I can see the rationale, Mr. Yuen. And I think probably living in there, <br />you know, if Kekela Street is blocked then theyll be hardly any traffic or any increase of traffic <br />within that street going to their subdivision; and I think thats one of the, perhaps, reasons why -. <br />YUEN:I should also mention though that the existing, there is a commercial area <br />acrossthestreet,onKekelaStreet.Andsopeoplegoingtherearegoingtoturnleftacross,you <br />know, as they do now, turn left across Puainako and go in there. And that you could, if you <br />really wanted to get to this new commercial area when you are already heading down makai <br />down Puainako Street, you could turn left on Kekela Street, go into the Firestone and come back <br />out. You know, theres only so far you can go with this. <br />GOMES:Can I -? <br />GRAHAM:Mr. Gomes, go ahead. <br />GOMES:I think the Polices concern was the left turn off of Kekela Street onto <br />Puainako, is that correct? Not left turn off PuainakoStreet onto Kekela? <br />DARROW:It just mentions already, lets see, Congestion at this intersection already <br />make a left turn from Kekela Street onto Puainako both difficult and hazardous. <br />GOMES:Yeah. Cause then youd be crossing two ways of traffic versus coming off <br />Puainako. There are always breaks in that light and a stacking lane there now, which shouldnt <br />impact too much. <br />GRAHAM:Were going kind of free form with the talk here. Itd probably be better <br />to try to go a little more formally so that the recording is more easy. Mr. Domingo, I might just <br />toss in what I remember from the process so youd understand how we came to today. <br />Previously the applicant had recommended those two intersections and the Planning Department <br />had proposed the two intersections, one on Kekela and one on Puainako; and the Planning <br />Department had recommended that we give a favorable recommendation when we send it to the <br />Council, but that there would be a traffic impact analysis report prepared and that would be the <br />basis for working out the traffic issues. And at that time in the January meeting the Commission <br />was not comfortable, was not completely comfortable with having all the major issues worked <br />out later through a Traffic Impact Analysis Report, so we were kind of wanting to know more <br />about the traffic before we passed it on favorably. And then based on that the applicant agreed <br />that, didnt agree, the applicant proposed that he remove the Kekela Street intersection to <br />simplify it. And the Planning Director felt that if the project was changed in that way, rather <br />than us just acting on it, he would recommended that he send up that information to the agencies, <br />5EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.