My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-03-05 thester
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-03-05 thester
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:48:01 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:47:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Department requires, which is concrete tanks. And, thirdly, as opposed to what the Water <br />Department requires, which is like galvanized ductile iron transmission lines, their intention is to <br />have like PVC pipes. So itÓs like with that understanding that if your condition pretty much like <br />covers that, then we would have no objections. But relative to, you know, the engineering <br />standards in terms of whether you have sufficient pressure and all that stuff, they all would be <br />compliant with whatever the engineer can certify to be consistent with the Water Department <br />standards. <br />FUJIKAWA:Mr. Director. <br />YUEN:ThatÓs the intent of the condition, where it says functionally equivalent. <br />Function is the ability to deliver water to a specific location, at a certain amount, at a certain <br />pressure, rather than the specification like the concrete tank. The steel tank is acceptable. The <br />engineer has to say that itÓs functionally equivalent. <br />FUKE:Right, okay. With that understanding, the applicant would have no <br />objections. <br />FUJIKAWA:Okay, any questions, Commissioners, to the applicantÓs representative? <br />KUBOTA:So, my, Mr. Chair? <br />FUJIKAWA:Kubota. <br />KUBOTA:Mr. Fuke, then my understanding is that you are in agreement with the <br />additional, addition to the condition regarding water that the County is proposing? <br />FUKE:As clarified by the Director, correct, yes. We just want to kind of put it on <br />the record. Because as the Director had indicated, on the previous petition, you know, the st <br />reviews the conditions and then it goes down to the Water Department and the Water <br />Department when they review the subdivision application they say, well, thatÓs not what this <br />conditions states. But now at least we have it on the record, so we can go back to the record and <br />say -. <br />YUEN:Sure. <br />FUKE:This is our understanding. <br />FUJIKAWA:Any other questions, Commissioners, to the applicantÓs representative? <br />Mr. Hessler, you have anything to say? <br />E. HESSLER:No. <br />FUJIKAWA:Go ahead. <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.