Laserfiche WebLink
into creating the EDH 2025 Plan. I’m sure they were all driven by a love of Hilo and a sincere <br />desire to retain and hopefully improve upon the so-called “unique character” of the Downtown <br />area. <br />It’s interesting to note that the website for this EDH Project contains a quote that’s attributed to <br />me, namely: “My dream for the future would be for Hilo to remain the kind of community that it <br />has always been.” Now I was born and raised here, and in making that statement I was really <br />expressing nostalgia for the wonderful life that I have enjoyed as a resident of the city. <br />However, I would not like it to be construed to mean that I am against change. I have seen <br />change in Hilo during my lifespan; some good, perhaps some not too good. But change is <br />inevitable. The greatest physical changes that have come about because of the two very <br />damaging tsunamis that hit the city, the first in 1946, the second in 1960. In retrospect, and <br />ruling out the more tragic human aspects of those events, they are perhaps the best thing that ever <br />happened to enhance our appearance. I can remember what the makai side of Downtown <br />Kamehameha Avenue looked like prior to 1946. It had a great deal of “character”, but it wasn’t <br />necessarily pretty. Similarly, the 1960 wave engendered the redevelopment effort that provided <br />the site for some much better looking buildings that exist today, as well as more extensive and <br />appealing open recreational area than most cities of our size will ever enjoy. This very building <br />is a result of that. All of which leads me to say that I think change is not only inevitable, it’s <br />good and it’s necessary, even though at times it may change the physical character of a place. <br />An example would be the County Building. You know, I spent 3 ½ years working for the <br />County, beginning of 1964 through the middle of 1967. When I started we occupied the old <br />Downtown County Building which was located on the Hamakua side of the Waianuenue and <br />Kilauea Streets intersection. Now there was a very beautiful old building that was very much in <br />the “character” of Downtown Hilo. But the County outgrew it and constructed the present <br />building located right here, the one we’re in, which we moved into during the period that I <br />worked there. The old site became a parking lot, much needed in Downtown Hilo and very <br />much in accordance with the suggested EnVision Hilo standards. So what’s my point? My point <br />is that that was change, and that was change for the better. <br />Truly visionary people are very few and far between. Most of us confuse vision with a wish list <br />for what we we’d like to see. I’m very much afraid that the proposed 2025 Plan offers just that. <br />You know, I read the “Overarching Vision”, and I think that’s best done with a soft violin <br />background, and in my mind it’s really just a wish list. And true vision goes much further out <br />than 15 years, which is the timeframe that EnVision Hilo is using. Believe me, that’s just a bit <br />blip. I speak from experience. Similar to what happened in 1946 and 1960 there will be great <br />changes in the physical appearance of Downtown Hilo due to natural causes in the future . It’s <br />not a question of if there will be another damaging tsunami, it’s a question of when. Perhaps <br />some of the more solid concrete buildings will remain, perhaps they won’t, but most of the old <br />wooden structures will eventually go. Mother Nature also provides termites and rot. <br />Without renovation and/or rebuilding, most of the wooden buildings will eventually fail. And <br />with the regulatory framework that exists and is being considered for even more restrictions, <br />what Mother Nature does not take, simple business economics will. How so? Now let’s look at <br />the notice sent out by the Planning Department to announce this hearing. Within the fourth <br />paragraph it states, “These changes are not intended to act as barriers to development, but rather <br />3 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />