My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-03-05 TMIZUKAMI
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-03-05 TMIZUKAMI
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:48:46 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:48:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Wainaku site belong to the telecom business. Ours is a labor service company with very little <br />storage space needed. <br />The complaint filed with the Planning Department last year came from a neighbor and was <br />related to our storage of derelict equipment on site. The complaint was fully justified, and we <br />corrected the situation immediately. I apologize for not having removed the equipment sooner. <br />They were stored on the property to be removed by a salvage operator. But due to the falling <br />price and scrap market, the scrap dealer did not remove them in a timely manner. I hope you <br />will grant me a long-term permit to remain at this location as the proposed use does not impact <br />the surrounding properties, the County or the State. I think my use of the existing farm building <br />is more to help agriculture than anything else. And the remainder of my property is fully <br />developed for Ag use. Thank you for allowing me the time to present this request. <br />WOODWARD: All right. Thank you, Mr. Mizukami. Let me ask you a question. Have you <br />had chance to review the Department’s recommendation and all the conditions -? <br />MIZUKAMI: Yes, I have. <br />WOODWARD: Including the three-year time limit? <br />MIZUKAMI: Yes. <br />WOODWARD: Are you in agreement with all of those conditions? <br />MIZUKAMI: Well, we -. <br />MELROSE: We -. I’m sorry. <br />MIZUKAMI: Okay, let me -. Can I just follow that conversation for him? <br />WOODWARD: Sure. Mr. Melrose. <br />MELROSE; Yes, what we would, we would like to ask the Commission to extend the three-year <br />term to the kind of five-year standard term that you’ve provided in other special permit <br />circumstances that I’m aware of. That’s one issue. <br />It may be a technicality but also there is a, the time limits, the 7 to 5, given the -. I mean if <br />you’re really going to be a stickler for the immediate timeframe --. Often if he has got to run off <br />to Kona and he picks up a truck at 5 o’clock, I’d hate to have that be an issue, cause it happens <br />intermittently and it’s not something that happens on a regular basis. But, certainly, the bulk of <br />the business would happen within this time frame. I’m just admitting to the fact that the business <br />periodically will come in to pick up a vehicle or drop one off that has to be delivered after five. <br />So it is just a pick- up and drop-off business. It’s not an on-going activity. So that’s a constraint <br />that perhaps more of a detail than anything else -. So, but those are the issues that we’d like to <br />address with you today, is the use of the three-year term. At this point it’s written such that it <br />terminates entirely at the end of three years. There’s no ability to come back and have a <br />6 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.