My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-03-05 TPD CDH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-03-05 TPD CDH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:48:54 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:48:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
purpose of the CDH zone is to “protect Downtown Hilo’s character, promote its functions as an <br />economic engine, and protect the health and safety of its residents and visitors.” It’s an ideal. <br />It’s not, you know, this is something that should be very definitive. This new definition goes on <br />to turn the current definition of Downtown Hilo on its head. Somehow Downtown Hilo has <br />changed from an area which should be a compact high density area servicing all types of <br />commercial and mixed uses, and is instead now a “Plantation Town”.One would suppose that <br />Downtown Hilo is now, and no disrespect to Honokaa or Pahala, but this is the economic hub <br />and seat of government for our island. And should, you know, this is the urban core of that <br />town. <br />Section 8, Chapter 25, Article 7, Division 2 is amended to add the Designation of Downtown, of <br />a Downtown Hilo Commercial Core. This additional new “zone” is an additional encumbrance <br />upon some of the most heavily restricted property in the CDH. Properties in this proposed zone <br />are already affected by FEMA and SMA regulations. I mean it’s a very restricted area as far as <br />development goes as it is, and creating a new zone only increases that. <br />Section 25-7-23 is the height limit. Many people have spoken about the height limit. Plain and <br />simple this is a “taking.” The current proposal is to reduce the height limit from 120 feet to 80 <br />feet and 60 feet in the proposed DHCC. At best this is roughly a 33% reduction of potential <br />buildable area and 50% at worst. On the other hand the authors of the ordinance will argue that <br />they give a 25% increase in overall residential density with the reduction of the residential <br />requirement from 1000 square feet per unit to 750 square feet per unit. But no matter if you are <br />in the DHCC or not, this is a net total loss to overall potential density, when what we’re trying to <br />do is encourage density. Some may argue that lot sizes do not allow for building to the height <br />limits. But not being taken into consideration is the option of Landowners to Partners with <br />adjoining lot owners, to consolidate or acquire multiple parcels to maximize development <br />potential. Reducing options here reduces the opportunity. <br />WOODWARD: If I could ask you to summarize, please. <br />YAMANAKA: Okay. I had a few more points but -. It is my belief that the intentions of the <br />authors were to craft an ordinance that would help in the process and encourage development in <br />Downtown Hilo, I have no doubt about that. They want to maintain Hilo’s “charm”. I think this <br />ordinance has completely missed the mark. This ordinance further complicates investment in <br />Downtown Hilo by imposing more stringent restrictions on the area and discouraging investment <br />by telling any potential investor (If this ordinance is passed) that Downtown Hilo is not a place <br />you want to invest, because the people do not want anything to happen here. That’s what we’re <br />telling people. In these economic times in which Downtown Hilo is experiencing high vacancy <br />rates and higher instances of crime, we should not create more layers of bureaucracy but rather <br />simplify the process in a clear and concise manner. Thank you. <br />WOODWARD: All right. Thank you, Mr. Yamanaka. Do we have any questions for <br />Mr. Yamanaka? Commissioner Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: Just a note of opinion. I appreciate your comments, yeah, and I’m not angry at you <br />on whatever you said. But, you know, the reference to a plantation town, Hilo being a plantation <br />11 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.