My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-03-05 TPD CDH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-03-05 TPD CDH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:48:54 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:48:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AU: Can you tell me about, you mentioned you were in it only for a year from 2008 to 2009. <br />And what was your reason to -? <br />YAMANAKA: I resigned from the Vision Keepers because of this ordinance. The Vision <br />Keepers as Eileen mentioned are shepherds. They try not to take a side either way. And as a <br />Vision Keeper I have a definite opinion about this ordinance and I needed to resign to be able to <br />voice that opinion. <br />WOODWARD: All right, very good. Thank you. <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? <br />WOODWARD: Yes. <br />DOMINGO: So you’re saying that the Vision Keepers that come before this Commission with <br />an already established direction where they really want to go in-? <br />YAMANAKA: No, I can’t -. Oh, sorry. <br />DOMINGO: Instead of rather being neutral and just presenting an option for the County to <br />accept or reject? <br />YAMANAKA: I don’t know that they come with a definite direction in mind. I can’t speak to <br />that for the individuals on the Vision Keepers. I think they take whatever they, they take what <br />they have and they put it together. And I think there are a few other Vision Keepers here that <br />could probably speak better to how their process works. I just know that I was not that, as a <br />Vision Keeper I was not able to step out and then -. I’d have to wear separate hats; and I don’t <br />want to wear separate hats. I speak what I speak. And the point of view that I have, and I did <br />not think it would be -. It would do my clients and my families which are owners in Downtown, <br />I think it would do them a disservice to be on the Vision Keepers and to put forth an ordinance <br />that actually hurts us and hurts Downtown Hilo. That’s my opinion. <br />WOODWARD: Fine, thank you. Is that it? Okay. Ms. Mallick, give us your name and address <br />first, and then begin, please. <br />MALLICK: Monika Mallick, 27-250 Maluna Place, Papaikou, 96781. Director, Chairman <br />Woodward and Members of the Windward Planning Commission, thank you for this opportunity <br />to comment on proposed amendments to Hawaii County Code, Chapter 25, Article 7, Division 2. <br /> My name is Monika Mallick and I am an owner of property in the Downtown Hilo area. <br />I am here before you today to express my opposition to the proposed changes introduced by the <br />EnVision Downtown Hilo 2025 group relating to the reduction in building height limit, as well <br />as the designation of Downtown Hilo Commercial Core as an additional “sub-zone” within the <br />CDH. <br />13 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.