My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-03-06 THQHQ
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-03-06 THQHQ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:51:12 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:51:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
make a profit, and make it worthwhile for people to do agriculture, so that they can make a <br />decent living out of it. A certified kitchen is the way to do that. I certainly can’t afford to build <br />a certified kitchen, nor would it be cost-productive for me to do so considering that my <br />tangerines they’re only in season a couple of times a year, a couple of months during the year. <br />And it’s a lot like that with many other crops. However, if you put in a certified kitchen, lots of <br />different growers of different crops can use that throughout the year. <br />WATANABE: I think we get that point. I’ve been pointing to my watch about four times <br />now. Okay, so -? <br />SIRACUSA: Okay. I would like then to also mention that the, what was my other point <br />that I was going to make. Now you’re getting me off the track, Rodney. <br />WATANABE: Well, I’ve had 3 ½ years of experience with you, I know where this can <br />go -. Okay, yeah, three minutes. <br />SIRACUSA: Okay. Basically I will then, you know, close out by saying that what is <br />being promoted here and proposed here is very much in support of local agriculture; and it is <br />also very much in support of the needs that the community has to create some more jobs in our <br />community. It is not against the zoning, it is not against the -. Basically the plan, even though <br />the map is wrong over here -. But if you look at the written part it is very much in line with that. <br /> And therefore I am asking you to allow these additional uses. Thank you. <br />WATANABE: Any questions? <br />IWASHITA: Mr. Chair, I’d just like to thank Ms. Siracusa for coming out and giving <br />her testimony. And it’s nice to see you again. <br />SIRACUSA: And good to see you all again. <br />IWASHITA: And I want to reiterate the Chair’s concern about time because we do need <br />to work within those time parameters. Thank you. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Justice, you already your stated your name so you can proceed. <br />JUSTICE: Okay, thank you. And this will be a test of my oratory skills to only have <br />three minutes to do this; but I will try my best. Okay, it seems to me that the two issues here are <br />the wordings “unusual” and “reasonable.” And I seriously think that there’s no dispute amongst <br />you as to whether this is unusual. So then the issues that you are addressing would be <br />reasonable, which would be Point A, and then Point B which would be not contrary to the <br />effectives and objectives of Chapter 205. As far as the General Plan, and we’ve spent a lot of <br />time on that, I’m not too really concerned with it because, No.1, the words on it are “General” <br />and “Plan.” So, I mean, if it’s a General Plan it’s just general. So we can, you know, it’s <br />general. And I’m glad that I was here to listen to your testimony or your hearing earlier because <br />I see amongst the members that you will weigh the benefits and the uses, so that we need to do <br />10 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.