2022-05-19 Leeward Exh B (Item 2 Council Bill No 120 PL-CC-2022-000001)

Home

not make mention of any fine schedule. The correct reference should be 291-72. The close quote after the word"Statutes" at the end of the sentence is likely a typo. So this is a note: Section ILB. of Councilmember Kimball's proposed amendments addresses this recommendation. The Director agrees with the proposed amendment and recommends adopting this change. Recommendation 3 from the Director is under Section 3. Definitions, consider changing the term "Networked charger"to match what is in the body of the bill. Reason for this is the term specifically as presented, "Networked charger" is not used anywhere else in the body of the bill. "Networked" is used four times under Section 25-4-54.1(a), and the term "Network-capable" is used in the definition of"Direct current fast charger." The recommendation here is to consider expanding the term "Networked charger"to include those alternative references. So this is another where the Councilmember proposed the change under Section ILC. of her amendments; it was addressed by shortening the term to "Networked,"which is fine, it satisfies the same thought. The Director agrees with the proposed amendment and recommends adopting this change. Recommendation number 4 from the Director under Section 25-4-54.1(a), clarify the size and type of parking spaces required to be considered a dedicated EV parking space under the requirements of this section. The reason for this is the Zoning Code allows for different types of parking stalls for compliance with parking requirements, for example, we allow for compact parking stalls, which may not work for, you know, all types of EV, electric vehicles. So the Director suggested that the Councilmember, or the Council, consider adding the qualifier, "full size," or provide specific minimum dimensions required for a dedicated EV stall. Section I.A. of the Councilmember's proposed amendments addresses this recommendation by adding the qualifier, "standard size," for the type of required parking space. The Director agrees with the proposed amendment and recommends adopting this change. Furthermore, the Director recommends the "standard size" qualifier be added to Councilmember Kimball's proposed amendment under Section LB, which would be as follows. So again, this is the Director's fifth recommendation. Under Section 25-4-54.1(a), clarify that the number of EV designated parking stalls shall correspond to the maximum number of plugs required under the development schedule. There was some confusion; was it number of chargers, and then another was number of plugs, which needed to be addressed. The section was unclear as written that each required plug needs to correspond with the number of dedicated EV parking stalls, for example, after 2029 each increment of 50 parking stalls shall include eight EV-designated parking stalls, because there would be eight plugs. Under Section I.A. of the Councilmember's proposed amendments, it was addressed by a recommendation by adding language indicating that the required number of EV stalls corresponds to the required number of plugs. The Director agrees with this proposed amendment and recommends adopting this change. Recommendation number 6, under Section 25-4-54.1(b), change the term "plan review"to "Plan Approval" and clarify the reference to an additional two years to comply with Subsection (a). The reason for this is there is no such reference to"plan review" found in the Zoning Code; however, Plan Approval is a process through which parking requirements are reviewed by the 5 EXHIBIT B