My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-03-06 TT-MOBILE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-03-06 TT-MOBILE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:51:21 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:51:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: Yeah, basically all you’re saying is roaming is we switch over the <br />communication and utilize the partner’s, shall we say, equipment technology? <br />TERAZONO: Absolutely, that’s correct. <br />WATANABE: Okay. Mr. Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Chairman, thank you. You answered the technical question. The <br />question that I have, and when we had this issue addressed with this 120-foot monopole that we <br />issued a special permit for in Kohala, they had already planned on putting five or six different <br />cell phone companies on that tower, and you say that technically that’s not a problem. Do you <br />have, do you have any plans now for coordinating this with other cell phone companies? <br />TERAZONO: Okay, let me, probably the answer to that question is when we planned for <br />this site, for example, the structure that we’re going to erect is needed to support “x” amount of <br />operators as far as structural capacity. Whether we have plans to invite other operators in, no, <br />that’s not something that we do. If another operator came and wanted to co-locate on, we’d <br />definitely cooperate with them and work with them in that sense. But there’s currently, as far as <br />I know, no plans for another operator to co-locate. I’m not sure, maybe you guys might know? <br />WOODWARD: Well, maybe, follow-up. There is now a Statute that people that build cell <br />towers have to offer other companies -. <br />TERAZONO: Right, yeah. <br />WOODWARD: The ability to co-locate. <br />TERAZONO: Yes. <br />WOODWARD: It’s not an option for you. <br />TERAZONO: That’s correct, yes. <br />WATANABE: Maybe, maybe I can clarify a little bit more. I think what he’s trying to <br />say is they don’t have any specific co-location agreements as of yet because they don’t know if <br />they’re going to have a tower yet. But when they do have the tower, they definitely, I think <br />economically also, it would be to their benefit to have co-location occur cause then it lowers <br />their cost. You had something to say, sir? <br />KAWABATA: Yes. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. To your answer to that, we do not solicit <br />other carriers up front to do co-locations on the towers on an upfront basis. We do open it up for <br />co-locations to all of the carriers, that we all have agreements between the individual carriers for <br />that co-location type of agreements. I understand the Statute that you are referring to and it, all <br />of our towers are always available for other carriers to co-locate upon. It’s a business decision <br />that each individual carrier will make on their own whether they will be co-locating or applying <br />for co-location or not. <br /> EXHIBIT A 18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.