Laserfiche WebLink
KOSSOW: Okay. Thank you. Thank you for that. Just for clarity too, would we have to <br /> create a motion if we wanted to work on let's say, Mr. Hustace or Mr. Lopez's map? <br /> Would we have to table the current draft based off of the previous meetings as we voted <br /> on that map? <br /> MELLON-LACEY: Well, I think that it's important to refer to the current—and this is <br /> just my opinion because this is not in the Code, but in order to enable the public to follow <br /> the changes that you're making, I think it's important to refer to the draft that was <br /> presented at the pubic hearings, and then show how the new changes that you want to <br /> make will affect that map. I don't see another way where the public could follow what <br /> you're doing if you went to a completely different map. But that's my opinion. I don't <br /> have something here that really gives us a guideline. But I think it is important that the <br /> public can track the changes you're making. <br /> KOSSOW: Thank you, Ms. Mellon-Lacey. Okay. Mr. Lopez, do you have something? <br /> LOPEZ: I have to agree with that sentiment because there is no further public hearings, <br /> there's no further opportunities for the public to view maps, other than what they might <br /> see on the website. So, to interject something completely different at them now would be <br /> bad. So, I have to agree with that sentiment. Keep what we have that's been viewed and <br /> modify that to fit the needs and particularly demonstrate how we are employing much of <br /> the valid testimony that was given to us. Thank you. <br /> KOSSOW: Thank you for that, Mr. Lopez. Is there any other discussion? (No response.) <br /> Okay, we'll go to the working draft. Excuse me, the draft prior to the yeah, yeah, yeah. <br /> Thank you. <br /> HUSTACE: Okay. So, up on the screen, Chair, I have Working Doc 1-4, which is the <br /> same as the proposed draft plan. Which the public was able to see,just tab between these. <br /> This is the same one, the Redistricting Commission Draft Plan, is the same as Working <br /> Doc 1-4. That was just a progression for the public to follow. So, we went from 1, 1-2, 1- <br /> 3, 1-4, and then 1-4 became the Commission Draft Plan. So, here on the editing software, <br /> I have that map up here. From here, we can make the changes based upon previous <br /> discussion and testimony. Chair, I'll leave it up to you where you want kind of dive in <br /> first. <br /> LOPEZ: Question. <br /> KOSSOW: Mr. Lopez. <br /> LOPEZ: This says read-only. Are we going to be able to work on this and keep it? <br /> HUSTACE: So, Mr. Lopez, I will—as soon as I make any sort of edits, I can retitle it and <br /> save it as new file. <br /> LOPEZ: Okay, it would be a new file. Thank you. <br /> 17 <br />