My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-09 TBigislando
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-03-09 TBigislando
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:55:41 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:55:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
project. As the Commission may have noted that the construction of this production storage <br />warehouse building does not involve the hiring of more employees; and if there would be, it <br />would be, you know, just one, or two, or three employees. So the traffic impact analysis report <br />does not reflect any additional significant traffic impacts on the streets surrounding this project. <br />So, again, we just want to be careful now that were not representing to you that, you know, <br />were going to be putting in traffic control devices, and street lights, and everything that will not <br />be related to the impacts and that, in fact, Public Works itself may not ask us for later on. <br />So I dont know if you would like me to be open to questions on that right now or whether I <br />should just finish the rest of my comments. Mr. Chairman? <br />ALAMEDA:Why dont we hold off on the questions for now; and well come back to <br />that issue. <br />TSUKAZAKI:Thatsfine. <br />ALAMEDA:Youcancontinue. <br />TSUKAZAKI:Allright,thankyou.Youknow,Iwouldlikealsosomeclarificationfrom <br />staff. There was a question from one of the Commission Members relating to the General Plan <br />LUPAG Map designations for this area; and I think what has been described are the amendments <br />that are going to be initiated, that are being initiated at this point. We believe that in the 2005 <br />General Plan Amendments there was an amendment which redesignated a number of the <br />properties, including the properties that are subject for this application, actually changed them <br />Low Density to Medium Density Urban. And I believe those amendments, that redesignation, <br />also covered the church property. Its just to, for the record, be clear that, you know, there have <br />been other gradual General Plan Amendments. And if were wrong on that information, then we <br />would like to be corrected, because I think weve made that representation based on our review <br />of the General Plan, weve made that representation in our application. So if what were saying <br />is true then these properties, including the church properties, you know, are in Medium Density <br />Urban right now. And from what Ive heard from staff earlier they were being proposed for <br />High Density Urban in the current round of amendments being initiated by Mr. Yuen. So -. <br />ALAMEDA:I have that noted. Could you maybe proceed in your -? <br />TSUKAZAKI:Sure. <br />ALAMEDA:And then we can come back to that. <br />TSUKAZAKI:Sure. <br />YUEN:Well, that is correct, that the surrounding area was redesignated from Low <br />Density to Medium Density in the amendments that were passed in 2005, and that we are <br />initiating an amendment to High Density for the Kekuanaoa Street frontage of the block with the <br />current round. <br />TSUKAZAKI:Right, correct. <br />15EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.