Laserfiche WebLink
TSUKAZAKI:Yes. What we did was add some wording to the, what I understand from <br />Mr. Gomes to be a standard condition. And, you know, it may be worthwhile to have <br />Mr. Gomes speak to this. Because when I talked with him just before the hearing, you know, he, <br />I believe, indicated to me that he didn€t, you know, and after reviewing the traffic impact <br />analysis report, he didn€t think it would warrant installation of, you know, traffic control devices <br />and things like that. So if that is the case and he wants to say that for the record, then some of <br />our concerns would be alleviated. So, okay? <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, thank you. <br />TSUKAZAKI:But, again, we€re just trying to reign in the scope of possible <br />improvements to what is said in the traffic impact analysis report and what the Traffic Division <br />of Public Works feels is appropriate. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay.Iwouldliketoattendtothatatthistime.Mr.Gomes? <br />GOMES:Yeah,Ibelieveapplicantsareafraidwhentheyhearthetermtraffic <br />control devices. I think in a case like this what they€re concerned about is traffic light; and what <br />I told Mr. Tsukazaki is that traffic control devices can be, you know, something as little as <br />pavement markings and that sort of thing, yeah. And I think in this case we would not require a <br />traffic light but we may require some pavement markings and that sort of thing, or our Traffic <br />Division will. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Mr. Tsukazaki, that has been noted for the record. Does that <br />suffice or would you like a more formal -? <br />TSUKAZAKI:No, I€m fine. I€m fine with the representations. It€d be better to have it in <br />writing but I, you know, place a lot of credence in what Mr. Gomes is saying; and we just, again, <br />don€t want to create an impression that the applicant is committing to install signals at an <br />intersection or something where it would not be appropriate. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Thank you. We have, I€m sure, a bunch of questions. We€ll start <br />off with Commissioner McCall. <br />MCCALL:Yeah. My question is for the Planning Director. Now on a situation like <br />this where these are conditions for the rezoning of the property, not necessarily conditions, I <br />mean, they are conditions based on what Big Island Candies is proposing to do with it. But our <br />zoning conditions, the conditions are for rezoning of the property which, I mean, market <br />conditions could indicate ten years from now that they want to put up apartment houses here or <br />something else, in which case these zoning conditions need to be somewhat generic for that. Is <br />that correct? Is that an error or am I off-based? <br />YUEN:Right. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Director? <br />YUEN:Right. <br />18EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />