My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-09 TBigislando
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-03-09 TBigislando
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:55:41 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:55:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
conditions. It is always tempting to do that. I, on this one, I would recommend against it; and I <br />would say to the Commission if youre not comfortable with rezoning this to some kind of, to <br />just saying its a Commercial rezoning, dont rezone it. If they didnt have a particular proposal, <br />all right, and it was Medium Density Urban and they just wanted CN zoning, I would favorably <br />recommend it, based on this is the kind of site that this is within the town. It is on, as Ive talked <br />about it, a busy street, its a logical place for a Commercial zone. We would have site specific <br />conditions like the sidewalk, like the access from the side; and we would recommend in favor. <br />So rather than put a condition on thats very site specific, I would not recommend it in this <br />instance; and I would say lets just go ahead with the Commercial zoning. <br />I think that the reality of whats going on here, I mean if I read their own minds for them, they <br />dont have good visibility from Kekuanaoa right now, which is something that a business wants, <br />and that for them to have some relatively open site line from Kekuanaoa is in their interest. But I <br />would not, you know, I would not recommend us putting on a highly site specific condition to try <br />tolimitthemtohavingalandscapedareaonKekuanaoaStreetinthisrezoning. <br />ALAMEDA:CommissionerGraham,follow-up? <br />GRAHAM:Yeah,Ithinkweretalkingaboutthesamethingbutmaybewerestarting <br />from a little bit different place. Im not talking about site specific condition. My understanding <br />is that park part is one specific parcel. So without any conditions is there not a more appropriate <br />zoning designation for that parcel that provides that kind of open space for it, and guarantees that <br />it will remain in something akin to that in the future? No condition, just ask to change the <br />application to a different rezoning designation for that specific parcel. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Director? <br />YUEN:Open. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. <br />YUEN:Yeah, I mean, again Im not recommending it. I dont think that, I <br />wouldnt recommend that as a zone. But just to give you a technical answer, Open, an open <br />landscaped area can be done in an Open zone; and very little else, but, yes, you can do it in an <br />Open zone. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:Then I guess I could pass that on to Mr. Tsukazaki since he has got all this <br />background. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Tsukazaki? <br />TSUKAZAKI:Yes. Again, what the applicant proposed there was to have an aesthetic <br />frontage to its project, okay, and to incorporate landscaping, to continue the landscaping that <br />they have which is aesthetically pleasing in the frontage of the existing operation and to continue <br />the landscaping theme around to Kekuanaoa. I also said and our application does say that its <br />envisioned as a possible, you know, rest area for people who are buying products within the <br />24EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.