My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-09 TBigislando
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-03-09 TBigislando
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:55:41 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:55:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
consider it with all the ramifications. The big picture, zoning is the big picture. If we say okay <br />we can do this specific use and we approve this, right, then its like the zoning is almost a done- <br />deal. Because if you dont do it then youre contradicting yourself, you know, and all of that is <br />going to come up to us. But the considerations are not all the same. The condition I would put <br />on this would be as long as the Community Development Plan, as amended, allows for this <br />project, fine, do it, right, but do the Community Development Plan first. We have the legal <br />authority to do that; it just needs to be done. And I understand that under present Department <br />resources you really, you know, cant do it. The Department cant do it, but maybe theres other <br />ways to do it. And that is my comment. If the applicant wants to respond to it, Id be happy to <br />hear. <br />ALAMEDA:All right, Mr. Tsukazaki, youre free to respond, or you dont need to <br />respond. Its up to you. <br />TSUKAZAKI:IthinkIunderstandthepointbeingmade.And,youknow,without <br />knowing whether the Community Development Plan will be amended, you know, in the near <br />future, its really difficult for me to say anything. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Thank you. And it also sounds like little bit were going to kind of <br />our discussion, too. So I wanted to ask if theres any other questions for the applicants or Mr. <br />Tsukazaki that we could ask them at this time before we ask him to be seated. We do have a <br />testifier. Seeing none, you may be seated. Thank you. Will David Kimo Frankel please come <br />forward. By the way, good middle name. I like that name. <br />FRANKEL:Good morning. <br />ALAMEDA:Good morning. Let me swear you in. Will you please raise your right <br />hand. <br />FRANKEL:All right. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. This is just protocol. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth now <br />before the Hawaii County Planning Commission? <br />FRANKEL:Sure. <br />ALAMEDA:All right. Could you please state your name and address for the record. <br />FRANKEL:My name is David Frankel. I live on Laukapu Street; but thats the <br />Laukapu Street in Volcano, not the one down here. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />FRANKEL:I dont really have any interest in this particular proposal, although my son <br />would like to see as much Big Island Candy as possible. But I do want to point out something <br />that I think that Ivan needs to look at, and based on comments on both what Chris and Norman <br />made that I dont think accurately reflect the law. And that is there is a Hawaii Supreme Court <br />27EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.