My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-09 TBigislando
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-03-09 TBigislando
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:55:41 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:55:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SIRACUSA:Well, yeah, very, very similar concerns, you know, and there are a few <br />other concerns I have as well. I would really prefer, and I dont know if this can be done, to see <br />the whole thing go back to the drawing board and resurface again a while down the road when <br />more of these issues are settled and dealt with. <br />ALAMEDA:All right, Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Thank you, Mr. Chair. <br />ALAMEDA:Sure. <br />IWASHITA:Must be something to do with my background, but I really would want to <br />have our Corp. Counsel brief us on the two decisions that was brought up, that were brought up <br />by Mr. Frankel and, cause it sounds to me his recitation of the principles that are applicable <br />mirrormygeneralconcernsabouttheprocessandalsomyoverallviewofhowandwhatthe <br />Planning Commission is supposed to be doing in this process. And I for one definitely, I dont <br />want to come close to the line that apparently has been drawn in the Dalton case and the other <br />case cited by Mr. Frankel. So assuming that both cases are still good law, then I would want to <br />know that, and what the decisions hold, and some of the facts, and if the facts are similar in any <br />way, you know, to the facts before us, and so what weight if any we should put on those cases. <br />ALAMEDA:Point well taken. Thank you, Commissioner Iwashita. Commissioner <br />Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. Bearing this in mind, Im wondering if instead of us working on a <br />motion to either approve or deny the permit we should consider tabling to allow time for Corp. <br />Counsel to come back to us with a legal opinion and possibly the applicant come back to us with <br />some, you know, more, some proposals to address some of the concerns. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Mr. Director? <br />YUEN:Yeah. Let me make a suggestion on the timing aspect of this because we <br />get into another timeframe, which is the applicants ability to move this up to the Council. And <br />what I would suggest, if the Commission is inclined to approve this on the merits of the <br />rezoning, that the Commission send it up to the Council. We will definitely have Corp. Counsel <br />give us a formal opinion as to whether this, or the zoning action should be held at Council until <br />the General Plan Amendment is adopted. And if Corp. Counsel says that, then thats what we <br />follow. And the reason for this is that the application was submitted and I believe that were, the <br />applicant has a right to send this up to the Council after 90 days. And that will run out before our <br />next meeting, is that correct, before our next Hilo meeting, right? Is that correct, Mr. Hayashi? <br />HAYASHI:Well, the application was forwarded to the Commission I believe the first <br />week in January. So 90 days will take it to April. <br />YUEN:When is our April meeting in Hilo? <br />th <br />HAYASHI:Its on April 7. <br />31EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.