My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-09 TBigislando
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-03-09 TBigislando
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:55:41 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:55:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
There is one other addition, change that I wanted to make,andthis is to be consistent with prior <br />conditions regarding drainage; and that would becurrentCondition I in your orange sheet. And <br />at the very end the condition should read, well, let me read the whole thing. Condition I, All <br />development generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be directed toward any <br />adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared and the recommended drainage system <br />shall be constructed meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works, and were <br />adding that, prior to receipt of a certificate of occupancy. And that is a standard language that <br />were now using for this drainage condition. <br />Okay, there are several changes that are being handed -. Okay, Condition G is also being <br />amended, and it starts off Commercial; and what we want to do is delete the word <br />Commercial and start the condition with Access shall be prohibited from Kekuanaoa Street, <br />and also adding except for access to the two existing homes until they are demolished. <br />And those are the changes that were proposing. Are there any questions at this time? <br />Oh, by the way, we were also handed a set of conditions for changes; and these were prepared by <br />theapplicantsrepresentative,orapplicantandtheirrepresentative.Sotheywouldbediscussing <br />those proposed changes. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />HAYASHI:And that is the white sheet like this. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Fellow Commissioners, we also have the presence of Mr. Kelly <br />Gomes over here, so if you guys have any questions for Public Works as well, hell be happy to <br />answer that. Any questions for our staff? Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:Norman, I can see in the map there where we have mostly Residential and <br />some Neighborhood Commercial, the brown area which is not todays application but its for the <br />existing facility and all in a different zoning category which as you said took place in 98 or <br />something. I also notice when I look at a General Plan map of the area, the General Plan itself <br />has change currently, already changed just for that existing area. So can I assume that the <br />General Plan was changed just in one spot to accommodate this applicant to have that facility in <br />the currently location in the past? <br />HAYASHI:Youre referring to the existing facility? <br />GRAHAM:Yes. <br />HAYASHI:Okay. The General Plan was amended back in 1997; and that was <br />initiated at that time by the then Planning Director for a change from, I believe it was Medium <br />Density to -. <br />GRAHAM:High density. <br />HAYASHI:Oh, Low Density Urban to High Density. <br />4EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.