My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-09 Tplanning_director
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-03-09 Tplanning_director
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:57:25 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:57:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YUEN:Well, there are subdivisions that are coming ready for final approval all <br />the time, and there are a bunch of, theres a lot of additional work that has to happen because the <br />Code hasnt been fixed. It is an on-going every day workload issue that adds to the workload of <br />the Department, along with this feeling of unease about a lot of tentative approvals that have <br />been given in the past. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />YUEN:I wanted to say one more thing about that. There was a statement made <br />that there is a 30-day window to appeal. What will happen is that if somebody wants to fight a <br />subdivision, they will say they had no notice of it happening. And that is correct because there is <br />not a public notice printed of the tentative approval of a subdivision. So its a very, its quite <br />possible that the 30-day appeal window would not be, the Court would not enforce that for <br />somebodythatdidnthavenoticeofthesubdivision. <br />ALAMEDA:IdliketointerjectrealquickcauseIknowat1:30CommissionerSiracusa <br />will be leaving us. And there was on the table a kind of matter fact working motion, if I could <br />phrase it that way, that kind of got seconded real quick. And I wanted to just ask Mr. Torigoe, <br />cause we didnt really, you know, it was all kind of in the mix, so I wanted to see kind of where <br />we might be at with that and how to proceed. <br />TORIGOE:Well, you had a motion to continue it. <br />ALAMEDA:Correct. Thats correct. <br />TORIGOE:And there was a second? <br />ALAMEDA:Thats correct. <br />TORIGOE:So thats on the floor. And it should be dealt with one way or another. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Now what if the maker of the motion has to leave us? Is that, <br />whats the procedures around that? <br />TORIGOE:I think you can still go ahead and vote on it. <br />ALAMEDA:And their vote would be absent? <br />TORIGOE:If they leave, yeah. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Continue, Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Maybe just first comment on that and then -. I believe on a motion to <br />continue if no motions are made it would be continued to the next meeting anyway. Is that <br />correct? Or would we need a motion to continue? I mean if -? <br />13EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.