My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-09 Tplanning_director
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-03-09 Tplanning_director
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 11:57:25 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 11:57:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:I wonder if the Director can answer the comments that Mr. Frankel made <br />regarding those changes on the top of page 6 and the bottom of page 7 regarding public <br />participation -. <br />TORIGOE:In the mike. <br />SPRINGER:Regarding public participation thats referred to in the recommended <br />amendments at the top of page 6 and the bottom of page 7. <br />YUEN:Well, if the public say responds to, sees the notice posted and they want to <br />see what is the subdivision, they will be able to come into the Department and see the <br />preliminary plat. And it will show the layout of the lots, they will have the lot sizes, it will have, <br />it will really have all the information that you can have at that point. What kind of wastewater <br />system is really determined by the Department of Health. And, the information, you know, what <br />youneedtoknowaboutthesubdivisionisthere,itsthereintheplat.Sowhatthissaysisthat <br />once its, once the subdivision has been sent out for -. What happens is that the preliminary plat <br />comes in, its like an application. All right? It is an application, but mostly its a map. There <br />may be pages that are appended to it but mostly its a map. All right? The staff of the Planning <br />Department looks at it and says does this basically conforms and do they have, is it signed by the <br />right people, does it have the right filing fee, and it conformed to-. There are some basic things <br />that are done at the initial stages, if it conforms to the zoning and so forth. Once thats done, its <br />then typically deferred and sent on to the agencies like the Department of Public Works, <br />Department of Water Supply. All that this says is that once its deferred then the application is <br />accepted as complete. And then you cannot, neither the Department nor a member of the public <br />can come back and say oh you should not have sent it on because it did not have the northpoint, <br />or they did not put lot numbers on the application, or something like that, something was missed. <br />And that is the gist of this application. So it can still go through the process and be approved. <br />But as far as the public seeing it, the public can look at it and see, you see everything thats really <br />germane within the application. Its there. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:So nothing in those changes removes public participation? <br />YUEN:No. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:On the motion before us, I think that the Director has gone through at least <br />the high points of Mr. Frankels testimony, and Im not sure what continuing it would <br />accomplish. By his comments here I dont see where there would be further amendment to the <br />Code. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Let me suggest this then. It seems like we have several options - <br />To go ahead and vote on the motion on the table for continuance; if we dont have the majority <br />vote then maybe a second motion could be made either way to approve or to deny, and then we <br />could go forward with that as well. So, how does that sound, Fellow Commissioners? Should <br />15EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.