2006-03-09 Tplanning_director - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

that and not even be able to pay this much attention. But I have a few sort of major little things that are kind of hanging over my head that I need to get cleared out before I can feel like going head with it. One of them was just the last thing that Mr. Torigoe said. He said like, you know, if theres preliminary problems in the preliminary, then that can be addressed and handled in the final. But then when I, I dont see anybody else talk about this. But every time I read it, I see on page 12 on the yellow copy down, you know, just in 23-73, the underline says, you know, the last half of the underlined sentence near the end of 23-73, the directors issuance of final subdivision approval shall be valid despite the absence of technical information as required by section 23- 69and 70. So thats not preliminary. Thats final. And 23-69 and 70 have a lot of stuff in it. So that seems to run contrary to what you just said a minute ago. And the other part of my issue, just as long as were on that, is it feels like if in some way were sayingthePlanningDirectormayproceedtoevaluateanapplicationeventhoughsomethingis missing, that feels okay to me. But it feels like some of this wording. which maybe was Commissioner Iwashitas concern about trying to be more finally honed, it sounds like the wording like The directors issuance of final subdivision approval shall be valid, its kind of like inoculating it against court challenge or something. I dont want to inoculate it against court challenge. If the guy didnt hand in this set and the other thing, hes colluding with some director in the future, I dont want to inoculate him against court challenge. But if all Im doing is allowing the Director to proceed with his best efforts cause of something technically missing, Im okay with that. But Im, I dont know -. ALAMEDA:Yeah. Well, Mr. Director? YUEN:It says shall be valid despite the absence of information contained in sections 23-69 and 23-70. Let me go down one by one through that information and tell you, you want to go -? I mean we can do that. GRAHAM:Prior to that? YUEN:Pardon me? GRAHAM:Commissioner Graham, go ahead. GRAHAM:Can I, prior to details, Chris, can I ask is this effectively inoculating from court challenge or is this effectively allowing you to proceed to process the application? ALAMEDA:Mr. Director? YUEN:It inoculates it from court challenge for the lack of the information in 23- 69 or 23-70, for lack of that information, yes. It does not inoculate it from court challenge for all causes, strictly the information in 23-69 and 23-70. ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham, follow-up? GRAHAM:And thats on final subdivision approval, not preliminary, right? 18EXHIBIT D