Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA:Okay, why dont we take a five-minute recess. Any objections to that? <br />No? <br />IWASHITA:No. <br />ALAMEDA:Five-minutes, please. <br />RECESSEDThe Chair called a short recess at 2:17 p.m. <br />RECONVENEDThe meeting reconvened at 2:29 p.m. <br />ALAMEDA:Let us continue our kukakuka, talk story. <br />SALAVEA:Thank you for the interpretation. <br />ALAMEDA:Hawaiian word for today. All right. So we left off with the possibility of <br />revisiting the 23-71. <br />YUEN:Three. <br />ALAMEDA:Seventy three. <br />YUEN:Seventy three. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />YUEN:My specific suggestion would be to put the word, on 23-73, to put the <br />word ‚technicalƒ in the last line so that ‚The directors issuance of final subdivision approval <br />shall be valid despite the absence of technical information required in sections 23-69 and 70.ƒ <br />The difference between the term, ‚technicalƒ I would distinguish from the term ‚substantive.ƒ <br />Substantivewouldmeanaffectingtherightsofotherpeople.Technicalwouldbethingslikethe <br />northpoint. <br />ALAMEDA:Director promises not to use that example again, yeah, Commissioner <br />Graham?Allright. <br />MCCALL:Justnotingthat-. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner McCall. <br />MCCALL:Oh, sorry. Just noting that the title of Section 23-73 is technical review. I <br />mean it supposedly, as opposed to -. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Okay, Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Thank you, Mr. Chair. After reviewing the proposed ordinance amending <br />the Subdivision Code further and taking into account all that weve discussed up till now, I <br />would amend, and then if amended I would support forwarding to the Council, as follows: On <br />26EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />