2006-03-09 Tplanning_director - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

SIRACUSA:Yes. I receivedtwo copies of the ordinance, one in white, the pink cover sheet, and one in yellow. I only had timeto read the yellow one. Are they the same? YUEN:Theyre practically the same. There are some slight changes in between the two. SIRACUSA:Could you outline those for me, please. YUEN:On Section 23-63(1), thats on page 6 of your yellow, and this is a change from, okay, this actually is a mistake in what we just did. Right now it says, Proposed name of the subdivision which shall not duplicate nor resemble the name of any other subdivision in the County. The proposed name shall be subject to approval by the Director. After we circulated the first set of amendments, we got a comment from one of our staff members that said we often, a lot of subdivisions that we have, say, a two-lot subdivision, they dont have a proposed name. Sowhatwewantedtodowaschangeitsoitdidntrequireaname.Sothisshouldactuallysay Name of the subdivision, if proposed, which shall not duplicate. As far as what the Code currently says, because it calls for a name of the subdivision, if somebody submitted a subdivision that didnt have a name on it, again, thats a technical mistake; and its technically wrong to have approved a subdivision without a name. Thats one change. So we would ask that this be changed so that that language, that if proposed clause comes in so its not mandatory that there be a name of a subdivision. ALAMEDA:Very good. Other changes, if any? YUEN:And in Section 23-65(3) on page 7, Lots, showing approximate dimensions, and weve changed the word minimum to proposed lot size. And the Code now, see, typically the subdivision will show a, say its a residential subdivision and theyll show a lot and theyll say the lot is 10,700 square feet, and the Department will check back to make sure that that conforms with the minimum lot size. For instance, if its an RS-10 zone, thats okay. But if its an RS-15 zone, thats not okay. But we want them to show the actual lot size rather than the minimum lot size because we have that in the zoning information. So thats why we changed that from minimum to proposed. And then we took out proposed lot numbers, we took out block numbers, many subdivisions dont have block numbers, and then put in if any, and thats just to say if any -. Okay? On page 11, its just a, this is a very, the word therefor becomes thereof. Thats a change from the previous draft. Those are the changes between the draft that you saw in Kona and the draft in yellow that you have today. ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa? SIRACUSA:So basically, for clarification -? ALAMEDA:Sure. SIRACUSA:The yellow draft is the more recent one, yes? 3EXHIBIT D