Laserfiche WebLink
going to be draining down onto this vacant parcel, which is owned by somebody else. I thought <br />that we couldn€t have -. I thought a standard condition that weusually have regarding water <br />runoff is that it be disposed of on site and not go into neighboring parcels. Am I confusing <br />apples and oranges? <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Director? <br />YUEN:They have to dispose of increases in their water on site, but they€re <br />entitled to pass through water that comes from off-site through their property. But where it <br />leaves a property it has to exit at the same place, the same volume and thesame velocity that it <br />would absent the development that they are doing. So that€s what they are doing, you know, <br />there is a floodway that goes across their property, mauka-makai. We don€t have a flood map up <br />here, but it greatly affects this property that€s makai of them ƒ that€s still zoned Ag 5 acres. It <br />has not been rezoned possibly for that very reason. But to be allowed to put the floodway in a <br />channelontheirproperty,theyhavetojustifytoFEMAandDPWthatwhereitleavestheir <br />property, it is, as I said, the same volume, velocity and location as it was before. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:I wanted to make sure that we couldn€t get sued by that property <br />owner down the line for saying that, oh, our decision increased flooding on his property, you <br />know, and made it unusable or uneconomic for him. <br />YUEN:Well, there is actually a Hawaii Supreme Court case and that says <br />the County is not liable for its review of plans done by a private developer. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa, any follow-up? Any other questions for <br />Ms. Scott? Seeing none, thank you very much, Ms. Scott. You can stay there. Ms. Fox, we also <br />have your letter. If you could not read it, but summarize your concerns. <br />FOX:Well, this is a little different. My name is Lillian Fox, and I reside <br />at 75-6081 Alii Drive. I speak for the -. I€m the president of the Alii Lani Homeowners€ <br />Association and also the disaster preparedness coordinator for the Alii Lani Homeowners€ <br />Association. <br />To date I am not aware of any environmental assessment having taken place regarding <br />SunStone€s proposed development of 289 condos. As this area involves the need to acquire an <br />SMA, HRS 343 requests the preparation of such a statement. And the Planning Commission€s <br />own amended Rules, Rule 9, in minutes of 9/22/06 it states, A Special Management Area Use <br />Permit application is incomplete until such time as the Planning Department has complied with <br />the requirements of Chapter 343, HRS and Title 11, Chapter 200, Hawaii Administrative Rules.‚ <br />Additionally Rule 9-11, B.1.d. commits the Planning Director to ask for an EA and/or an EIS <br />before the SMA Permit is issued. I would be happy to read you Statutes. And I believe the Rule <br />needs to be followed because there will be a significant alteration to the drainage of the property <br />that would redirect flow of possibly millions of gallons of water per hour into a FEMA <br />designated flood channel makai of the property and adjacent to Alii Lani. Because this stream <br />creation and flow modification has a potential of creating a major impact to the environment by <br />9EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />