My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-03-16 THUSSEY
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-03-16 THUSSEY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:03:12 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:03:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DOMINGO:In this particular issue, how much impact would it be on the <br />developer of these lands all these parcels thatwere rezoned? <br />YUEN:Well, I dont know the exact financial impact. It is an 8-lot <br />subdivision. The basic requirement is that they earn one affordable housing credit for every 5 <br />lots; its a 20-percent requirement. And you can earn a credit in several ways. You can sell lots; <br />it means selling lots at a I think the affordable price is something like 100,000 but you have <br />to earn double credits when you sell a lot rather than sell a house because you are not creating <br />the house. So in a subdivision like this it is financially difficult to sell lots. The alternatives are <br />they can develop housing off-site, they can also buy credits from developers who have produced <br />more affordable housing than they need to produce and have what we call excess credits <br />under the Ordinance. So there is this market mechanism. There are developers who have excess <br />credits in the area. They are allowed to transfer within a 15-mile radius of their site. So those <br />arebasicalternativesavailabletoadeveloper.Thealternativesarethesameforeverydeveloper. <br />DOMINGO:IfImay.Youknowfor-.Icanlookatthisparticularincidence <br />where perhaps it would be subdivided and sold to others, and that those others would probably <br />come in and build homes. And, well, hes doing this for speculative purposes. But in a case <br />where you have a bona fide farmer who has some fairly large parcel and decides to rezone it and <br />subdivide into smaller parcels for farming purposes, and not with the intent of selling and to <br />make a profit on that sale, but for the sake of perpetuating agriculture in the particular area, <br />would that not be a bit too harsh to be demanding of them to come up with further additional <br />cash, so that they can still maintain the farming endeavor in that particular area? <br />YUEN:Well, first question is how do you know what they are going to do. <br />Second is that there is the ability to build a house with the property; its not strictly being <br />subdivided as simply a farming lot, you know, you can put a house on it. So the question is what <br />is a line to be drawn between a subdivision that looks like its primarily agricultural and should <br />not contribute toward affordable housing, and the decision was basically at this sub 5-acre. We <br />could look at a lot of 3-acre subdivisions, and youre going to see particularly the ones done in <br />the last 20 years or so primarily residential uses rather than primarily agricultural uses. And <br />whether you want to measure by the value of the property or the value of the uses being put on it, <br />I stand by the statement. <br />DOMINGO:You know, I can appreciate this condition. And in view of the fact <br />that many Agricultural lands are being developed for the sake of just building homes and not <br />going into agriculture. And this perhaps would curtail some of those applicants and address the <br />concern. But my primary concern is that our ability to maintain those Agricultural lands in <br />agriculture. Thats my concern. I just needed to say that because in the event in the future if <br />anything like this would come up, then I will again bring it up, and that would indicate my <br />concern. Thank you. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you, Commissioner Domingo. Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. A question for Jeff. The Change of Zone Ordinance was <br />approved in 1990. Since that time, they have come in three times for extensions: A one-year, a <br />3EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.