My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-03-16 THUSSEY
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-03-16 THUSSEY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:03:12 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:03:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FISCHER:Havent considered that, but certainly open to it. In fact, most <br />people that ask about these properties are neighbors right in the area that wantto downsize. <br />They want to sell their present homes and build something smaller. <br />SIRACUSA:Certainly thats a consideration when you get older and it gets <br />harder and harder to clean a big house. Id like to ask the Director, if I may. Since they are <br />talking about not building the homes themselves, which is selling the lot sites, and there is no <br />minimum building size, how would that conflict with the affordable housing requirement if <br />they are not building the homes themselves anyway? <br />YUEN:We have a great deal of lot-only development on the island, you <br />know. Very commonly whether its -. Uniformly an Agricultural lot will be sold without a <br />home, and very often even a residential subdivision is sold without a home. So we have an <br />affordable housing requirement that applies to those as well. You get a half a credit for the <br />affordablelotversustheaffordablehomebecausethensomebodystillhastoputahomeonit. <br />And frankly, yes, the market value of a 3-acre lot in this subdivision is going to be a lot of <br />money. And I dont have a figure for you, but its a lot of money; and from the economic point <br />of view, probably the least economic alternative for the land developers is to sell a 3-acre lot at <br />the affordable lot price. Thats going to be the least economic alternative for them to fulfill the <br />affordable housing requirement, but there are other alternatives including the purchase of credits <br />from I dont believe Surety is going to be within the 15-mile radius; I can tell you that there are <br />credits that accrued to Nansei for development in the Waikoloa area that I believe are within the <br />15-mile radius, and then also Parker Ranch has affordable housing credits. But the affordable <br />housing policy does cover rezonings whether the developer sells lots only or sells houses. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you, Mr. Yuen. Do we have any other questions for the <br />applicants representative? <br />WATANABE:Chair? <br />GRAHAM:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Its not directed towards the applicant, but again Id like <br />clarification from Mr. Yuen as far as how much impact, I mean, how many affordable credits <br />would this project require. You had mentioned something about one in the beginning and she <br />was mentioning its going to cost her between 800,000 to a million, which I guess thats based <br />on selling the most expensive way selling all of the lots for 100,000 dollars, which is I think <br />out of reason. <br />YUEN:The project has to earn its an 8-lot subdivision has to earn two <br />credits. Its rounded up to the nearest whole number. <br />WATANABE:Two credits? <br />YUEN:Two credits. <br />8EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.