My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-03-17 Leeward Exh C - Bergin
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2011
>
2011-03-17 Leeward Exh C - Bergin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:07:16 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:07:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FUKE: Yes, as long as, you know, there can be reasonable assurance that there would be no <br />standing water or apuddle like that, yes. <br />COTTLE: So we could remove the word “paved” from Condition 2 -. <br />MASUNAGA: But the driveway is going to be paved, though. <br />FUKE: Yeah, the driveway is already paved, yeah. <br />GIFFIN: So “paved” is -. <br />MASUNAGA: Yeah, so that one is correct, actually. <br />GIFFIN: Leave “paved driveway access” -. <br />COTTLE: Leave “paved driveway access,” and gravel or grass parking stalls. <br />FUKE:I guess, well, Madam Chair, I don’t really think that an amendment to the condition is <br />necessary as long as there is a, you know, public understanding that, you know, that’s the intent and <br />this is the way that the project has been approved or– I’m sorry, I don’t want to jump the gun – the <br />project has been considered. <br />MASUNAGA: So actually, the way it’s stated now is fine, but the staff needs to understand that <br />some of the parking stalls – you are not talking about all of them, right? <br />FUKE: We are not talking about all of the parking stalls; we’re talking about some of the parking <br />stalls may, being in the area, may not necessarily be paved. <br />GIFFIN: Maija, are you clear on that? <br />BEAUDET: I’ve got acomment. <br />GIFFIN: I’m sorry. Commissioner Beaudet. <br />BEAUDET: The matter should be given its consideration in the plan approval, because in the plan <br />approval you have a map including infrastructure, buildings and things like that, also with <br />identification for adequate parking. So the matter can be mitigated during the plan approval <br />process; it doesn’t have to be commented on here. And I think that’s what Mr. Fuke is trying to <br />communicate to us as well. <br />MASUNAGA: Unless you prefer -. <br />GIFFIN: That’s what I’m asking. Is this something that the Department is comfortable with? <br />COTTLE: The only reason why we would prefer to put it in writing is because when another <br />planner comes and looks at the conditions when they are looking at the plan approval, they want to <br />be able to look at the condition and not have to interpret it and have it be spelled out pretty clearly. <br />MASUNAGA: Okay, that’s probably better for -. <br />6 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.