2005-03-18 TKIC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

So, as it stands, my preference would be to take it out or Id vote against this. Id like to hear what the other Commissioners think. GALDONES:Question to the department. If condition 12 is accepted and the administration decides that it will not grant the continuance or an extension then the applicant may come before the Planning Commission as it is doing today to ask for that extension is that the process? DARROW:They would have no other choice but to come back before the Commission for a time extension at that point. GALDONES:So theres an appeal process that- it could very well come back to the Planning Commission even if we accept condition number 12. DARROW:Correct. GALDONES:CommissionerGraham. GRAHAM:Imwonderingifmaybetheresa-wereinalittlebitofatime constraint here in the sense of the sequence of events that have led up to today if the applicant applied for a 2 year extension thinking that he would have access to an administrative extension beyond that and then he finds the Planning Comm- Planning Department policy is not to make such a administrative extension available maybe he would prefer to have applied for a 3 year time extension or something like that. And I guess we dont have any background as to whether that would be acceptable or not so Im just sort of wondering if the process is such that if we follow- I tend to agree with Commissioner McCall that if the Planning Department Policy has been a one way in the past we should stick with that and Im just wondering if- if we do stick with that if perhaps the applicant could between now and when this- excuse me I was thinking this was going to go to the Council and that he could maybe adjust his situation but it certainly is not going to go to the Council if its an SMA permit so- LIM:On the applicants behalf if the Planning Commission is leaning towards deleting the time extension for the administrative time extension then if possible we just ask for a 4 year time extension on this date then we would- you know that should- hopefully we get that done by then. I cant promise cause it hasnt happened yet but- but that might be the way to resolve it. I think- just to be clear, the reason- the distinction between the Planning Directors deletion and our request to put it back in is just that in 2 years we would possibly get a time extension from the Planning Director under my scenario and under his we would have to come back to the Planning Commission. So it would- I thought save you folks some time and energy but if thats the Planning Directors current policy then I understand that- you should understand that the- that- thats a change in policy fairly recently. This is the first one that Ive seen where he completely takes out the time extension condition. 8