Laserfiche WebLink
GALDONES:Just for my information, Jeff, I€m just building upon Commissioner <br />Springer€s earlier comments that if there are other developments later on down the road that may <br />surface and that this venture here somehow gets, seems to be getting in the way, is there a way to <br />reject or revoke that permit that we have already approved? <br />DARROW:It has been brought to my attention that Condition No. 11 would apply to <br />that situation. If I can read it, it states, The applicant shall be responsible for operating the <br />heliport facility in a manner as represented to the Planning Commission, including good faith <br />negotiations with qualified helicopter tour companies, and prescribed under the conditions of <br />approval of this permit. Non-compliance with these representations or conditions of this permit <br />shall cause the Planning Director to schedule a public hearing on the matter before the Planning <br />Commission to determine whether a violation has, in fact, occurred.‚ <br />GALDONES:So Condition 11 is interpreted to apply in that kind of a situation that <br />there€sapossibilityofrevokingthepermit?Ismyunderstandingcorrect? <br />DARROW:Itappearsthatitwouldbebasedonnon-complianceoftheconditions.I <br />don€t know about, maybe the Planning Director could answer this more directly, but we might <br />need to look at a possible additional condition or the possibility of limiting that extension to <br />5 years. <br />GALDONES:One moment. Any further questions, Commissioners? Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:Yeah, I have to say that a, if, say a project came in that was nearby this <br />and it was, say, a residential project very close that was not compatible with the heliport, we <br />could not make, we could not say, well, this is condition applies so the heliport has to shut down. <br />We would have to take the heliport as a given in the operations and deal with that in, in respect <br />to the other application. I believe that the same applicant owns the neighboring property; and <br />that is a factor in our consideration or recommendation of 10 years on this. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:While Condition 11 pertains to violations, Condition 10 seems to take into <br />consideration a listing of all complaints. And I wonder if the Director can explain to us how that <br />list of complaints might be acted upon if the number or nature of complaints become alarming or <br />significant. <br />YUEN:If the complaints were with respect to things that were not violations of <br />the permit or some other kind of actual rule, if it€s, we couldn€t take any enforcement action. <br />There€s a series of conditions of the permit, if we get complaints, we find that the complaint <br />shows that they€re violating the conditions of the permit, then we could revoke the permit. If <br />they show that they€re violating some other rules and regulations, there€s a catch-all, and we <br />could also revoke the permit for that, like they€re flying too low, some place else, that kind of <br />complaint. But if it€s just a, if it€s a complaint of something that people really don€t like but it <br />does not violate any of the specific conditions of the permit, or any other rule or regulation that <br />applies to their operations, then we just take it as noted. And it€s something that could be <br />brought up at a time when the permit is renewed, and that could be taken into account and say, <br />well, people are not happy with this, even though it doesn€t violate any of the conditions. You <br />4 <br /> <br />