2005-03-18 TWAIKOLOA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EMLER:I dont believe we have a more current traffic study. I didnt come, I didnt find one, anyway, when I reviewed the application. I did make a comment to the application that the traffic study should be updated and monitored periodically to determine when the intersection should be signalized, based on warrants of the MUTCD. SPRINGER:Mr. Chairman? GALDONES:Commissioner Springer? SPRINGER:Should that then be reflected in Condition C or somewhere else in the conditions of this? EMLER:Well, that was my recommendation. Its up to the Planning Director to impose the condition. SPRINGER:Mr. Chair? GALDONES:Commissioner Springer. SPRINGER:Could the Director respond to that question that I have about the currencyofthe1989trafficreportandifthereshouldbeamorecurrentanalysisdone. GALDONES:Mr. Yuen? YUEN:I think thats a good suggestion. GALDONES:Mr. Emler, if were requesting a more updated one, how long does that take to acquire something like that? Where Im going with this is if were going to make that as part of the condition, shall we make it part of the condition that they do get that now before we approve it? But I dont know how long its going to take before they can get something like that. Im looking at how its going to impact their application. YUEN:It should be, the timing should be before Final Subdivision Approval because we dont know, theres no sense doing it now if they dont build now. The time to do is, say they build in 2009, they go to subdivision in 2009, thats when we will see that, thats when we will see it done. GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Yuen. Mr. Emler? EMLER:Based on my reading of the ordinances, it would seem that it separates when the warrants are needed. It actually separates when the warrants are needed from the construction of the subdivision. GALDONES:Okay, thank you. Commissioner Springer? 4