My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-03-18 TWAIKOLOA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-03-18 TWAIKOLOA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:10:50 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:10:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
hour period of volume is number one. I believe ratio of direct traffic volume is another <br />one. Then I believe delays of any particular movements. So thats at least four of them. <br />Im sure I could name all six if I -. <br />YUEN:Pretty, pretty good. I do know, we did get a TIAR for this <br />intersection done by Castle & Cooke. Did you see that? <br />EMLER:No. <br />YUEN:Okay, we did get one done by Castle & Cooke in the last year. <br />EMLER:I didnt review that. I believe that was done out of the Hilo office. <br />YUEN:Right, right. Anyway, their conclusion was that it wasnt <br />warrantedyetbutitwould,itmightbeasthebuildoutcontinuesonoftheWaikoloa <br />Development, although they felt that their having a second entry at their development <br />would alleviate some of the traffic at the Paniolo intersection, and then you wouldnt <br />need a signal at the Paniolo intersection. I know that many people living in the <br />community say they need a signal right now, as a matter of community here. And so we <br />do have a TIAR that accounts that, you know, thats professionally done. It was done for <br />this sort of project. I dont know that they, you know, what the opinion is of the <br />Department of Public Works on the particular study at this time, but we do have one that <br />was done in the last year or so. <br />EMLER:The zoning for that parcel is already granted though and theres no <br />condition for them to install a signal. However, we have a condition on this particular <br />development. And in our comments we really just wanted to point out the fact that, yes, <br />we have a developer thats required to install a signal here; and it does say it doesnt have <br />to be when they do their development, its when its warranted. And so we decided to <br />make an issue out of it because its an opportunity to have someone do it. However, if <br />its warranted now, you know, I dont know what the study said, but the County could <br />end up having to pick up the tab for the signal. Its just that weve already imposed this <br />requirement on a development, and it seems like we have an opportunity, thats all. <br />YUEN:No, youre absolutely right that the current condition and what we <br />carry over does require the Waikoloa Highlands project to signalize the intersection when <br />the Department of Public Works determines that its necessary. Thats the way its <br />written. And then the only thing were discussing is whether we should have a condition <br />requiring them to make them, requiring them to do a study now. And I just wanted to <br />mention that we did have a study, we do have a study done for another development of <br />this intersection in the last, in the last year or so. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Chair? <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Springer? <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.