My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-03-18 TPARKERSCHOOLTRUST
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-03-18 TPARKERSCHOOLTRUST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:12:29 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:12:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MISSIEN:Thank you. Im interested in this whole process because I am the land <br />owner of the piece of property directly across from the acreage in question. I dont live there <br />now because we havent built there yet, but thats the reason we bought the land and that was our <br />hope. I wrote the letter that I suppose you have in front of you, and Im really nervous. For me <br />at least, theres a number of issues, but Im going to try to keep it brief, something I wasnt really <br />able to do on my letter. And one of them is that I had hoped when I had when- my family and I <br />had hoped, when we first heard this idea that one of the considerations that would be made by <br />both the Trust and the Board once we figured out that they were 2 separate entities, was that they <br />would consider the entrance not coming into the residential community at all, that because this <br />was going to be a campus, possibly also a extended education facility, that the access be from the <br />main road as it is right now for Parker School. Thats what I said in my letter. Other people <br />have presented the same idea, Im not trying to say its only mine. But that is one thing that I <br />think would- I think you use the word mitigate- would certainly go a long way towards lessening <br />the impact on the community. <br />To my mind there are 2 communities under discussion here. Theres the community that actually <br />livesthere,theneighborhood,andtheresthecommunitythatusesthatneighborhood.Istillfall <br />under that one. Ive been walking my sons there since they were babies and I could not have <br />done that living where we lived. I still couldnt do that living where we live because of the <br />traffic. It is primarily because that is a safe walking neighborhood. Shade is nice too. But its <br />the neighborhood being the kind of streets it is that makes it so attractive to people like me and to <br />all the other people who use it every single day. Its certainly the reason that made it attractive to <br />us when we found a parcel that we were able to afford- to think that we might live there. And I <br />think its important to recognize that- that this more than just a quiet neighborhood, that the <br />impact is not simply to the people who live across the street, whether thats me, or somebody <br />else, or whether its someone who lives down the road. Its to everyone who uses, who would <br />use that that the traffic impact would be tremendous. And I think thats one of the main issues <br />here, is that what would happen with that. <br />And then another is that there seem to be 2 ideas going. And Im not sure if theres a partnership <br />in place between the 2 bodies and between their ideas, but I think the potential is there that there <br />could be. In my mind there should be. But if there isnt right now, I think there could be- they <br />have a common goal, it seems to me, of education. And the facility that is already being used <br />now for the 2 purposes - day education for day students and then evening education for extended <br />st <br />- there is a precedent for that in the public schools. They have the 21 Century Federal Program; <br />I dont know if youre familiar with it but thats a national program. It is based on the use of <br />schools, the use of public school facilities during non-school hours. They began at the Waikoloa <br />School. They are becomingisland wide. They are becoming state wide based on national <br />models. Theres a precedence to model from- it does not require separate facilities. In fact, it <br />takes advantage of the fact that there are existing facilities not in use during after school, evening <br />and weekend hours. Its kind of a win-win situation thats- this is, thats why the program has <br />come into existence. And, I think its an excellent model, it actually exists already. And, it <br />could be very good, to me, for all parties concerned, for the Trust, which seems to be looking for <br />a financial venue, for the school which seems to be looking to expand, and for the community <br />whichwould-thecommunity,theneighborhoodcommunity,thecommunityatlargewhich <br />could benefit from both- from both things. Hopefully theyll not by damaging the existing site. I <br />thinkImdone. <br />17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.