My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-03-18 TLOTOWNERS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-03-18 TLOTOWNERS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:12:33 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:12:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HAYASHI:Thank you Mr. Chair and members of the Commission. Good morning. <br />First of all Id like to apologize, I placed a map in the different orientation, I like to have a map <br />thats on the mauka, makai orientation. This particular map shows the general location of the <br />area. This would be Queen Kaahumanu Highway leading towards Kona and this would be in the <br />Kawaihae direction. The Waikoloa development is in- in this general configuration and the <br />Mauna Lani Resort complex is in this configuration. The subject property is indicated by this <br />red dot. It is a subdivision consisting of 48 single family residential lots which is currently zoned <br />multiple residential. There are 4 lots within the subdivision 3 of which are common areas and <br />also the roadway lot. The Mauna Lani Bay Resort is situated at this particular location as you <br />come down Mauna Lani Drive. Basically the intent behind this particular rezoning is to have the <br />zoning reflect the current use of the property which is for single family residential purposes. The <br />covenants of the subdivision is that this shall be- this particular- the lots will be used for <br />residential purposes only. As I indicated there- 46- the background report reflects 46 landowners <br />that are agreeable to- and they responded to having their property rezoned from a multiple <br />residentialtoasinglefamilyresidentialzoneddistrict.Therewere2-accordingtotheapplicants <br />application there were 2 individuals that did not indicate that they wanted to have these- their <br />property rezoned so these 2 particular properties will still retain- be retained within the multiple <br />residential zone district. Basically, this would be the general configuration of the subdivision in <br />the same orientation as this particular map. The 2 properties that are- will be retained in the <br />multiple residential zoned district would be this particular lot here and this lot here. We are <br />recommending approval of this particular request. Are there any questions? <br />GALDONES:Commissioners any questions of Norman. <br />YUEN:Im sorry I was looking away when you showed that- can you show me <br />the 2 lots that are remaining multi-family? <br />HAYASHI:This would be- this particular lot as well as this lot here. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:Norm, I was just going to ask if you had any thoughts of any particular <br />concerns or considerations that we should be aware of as a result of there being 2 lots not a part <br />of it. Does that make any complicating factor that youre aware of that we might not see on the <br />face of it? <br />HAYASHI:I dont believe so. Not to my knowledge. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Norman, is it recorded which lots someplace in the record which lots are <br />the ones that going to still remain as multiple family? If not, shall we enter that into the record if <br />you could do so please. <br />HAYASHI:I could place it on the record. Its in the background report. But these <br />would be parcel 7 and 19. <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.