2004-03-19 tumphrey - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EMLER:I did take a look at that, but I didnÓt know if the Applicant had a right to use that road. YUEN:Yeah, weÓve determined that it does appear that they do. EMLER:Oh -. YUEN:Is that better, worse? Because the double left-turn lane is going to be really hard to do. EMLER:I believe St. Paul Road lines up close -. My recollection St. Paul Road lines up closer to the northerly property line. But, yeah, I would be concerned about conflicting roads. IÓd want to take a better look at it. Sorry, I didnÓt really investigate that as well. YUEN:Okay. Thank you. EMLER:Okay. FUJIKAWA:Any questions, Commissioners, to staff or the Director, or even the Applicant? Okay, now, IÓd want hear a motion to close the publi testifiers? Springer? SPRINGER:Mr. Chairman, IÓm sorry I thought there was another testifier. I would like to then inquire of the Applicant, with regard to the Department of Public WorksÓ memo, dated February 5, 2004, do you have a copy of that or are you familiar with that? B. UMPHREY:I believe I read it, but IÓm not, I donÓt have a copy; and maybe you could tell me what youÓre thinking there. SPRINGER:IÓm wondering about your ability to conform to the recommendations that are made in the memo. Perhaps staff can provide for you a copy of it. FUJIKAWA:Okay. SPRINGER:IÓm on the second page of that memo, on the Roadway sec And, in particular, IÓm noting their concerns Ðabout the ApplicantsÓ ability to conform to the minimum sight distance requirement.Ñ Can you make a comment regard to that first concern under Roadways? B. UMPHREY:No, I canÓt really because we really donÓt know what the use is going to be. ItÓs not going to be a high use project; and the traffic is not something that we have control over. All those other commercial zones have the same issue. So we 6