2004-03-19 timming - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

they have 22 parking spaces. So if you use the same rationale that theyÓre applying to us that there would be at least two cars for every unit, that would mean that they now have ten people parking on the street. Yes, they say they have seven other parking spaces for guests, thatÓs their requirement okay. Our parking requirement, and we meet the CountyÓs requirement for parking on our development for the number of units. The number of units meets the zoning for the parcel also. So if thereÓs any problem down there on on-street parking right now, itÓs created by this adjoining condominium. And I have taken pictures of parking along there and I agree that they have a problem down there. That condominium has a problem. All the other condomini with on-street parking because the County has not seen fit to require, in the past, adequate parking on-site for these condominium projects. But now thereÓs a concern for this last piece of property to be developed in this area that has the zoning, that the number of units meet that zoning, that the parking requirements meet the requirements. And so now thereÓs a traffic problem for us providing the number of parking spaces we have. Had this other condominium development provided the same number that weÓre providing proportionately, they would have had more. In addition, they had a problem with their sewer plant and they had constructed a out, a overflow drain into the street out there and placed a large concrete barrier into the street that prohibits parking of at least one space. So they have restricted the parking on the public street. I have pictures of people in the neighborhood parking on this piece of property that we have proposed to be developed, back in off of the public right-of-way onto the private property. So this question about the on-street, the off-street parking problem is there already. I think we have as much right to that off-street parking with this development as any other condominium development in that area. And I take it, you know, that you would approve, contested, contestment on this on that basis, I canÓt see how you could do that after the testimony that was given about how many parking spaces. There was nobody who questioned about, ÐWell, youÓve got 22 units and youÓ spaces, arenÓt you parking on the street?Ñ They say weÓre going weÓre adding 10 more, theyÓre adding 22 on the street. We have more frontage on the street than they have, if you include Seaview from Kuakini down to Seaview and the Seaview frontage. We could provide more off-street parking than they can on our own frontage. They have room for 5 cars, they have an excess of 22. I think youÓve made a mistake, okay, in allowing this. FUJIKAWA:Mr. Imming, your testimony, this is what youÓll testify with the hearings officer, and being that we have granted -. IMMING:Yes, yes, we will. But what I take amiss is that, you kn this has been granted that requires, that itÓs going to postpone this project for three, four, five, six months, who knows, just on a whim. Thank you. YUEN:Mr. Imming -. 10